The Bestial of British Re-Booted: Whites and Blacks Should Not Mix

“Goldfish marries piranha.” That’s how I would summarize the marriage of the dim red-head Prince Harry to the conniving Meghan Markle. Like many others, I do not think the marriage will last. The Guardian and BBC have been very enthusiastic about it, so you can be sure that it’s bad both for the monarchy and for Britain.

A gigantic lie

After all, their enthusiasm is based on a gigantic lie: that the stale pale nation of Britain is immeasurably enriched by diversity and that non-Whites are our moral and spiritual superiors, having acquired deep reserves of wisdom and virtue in the long centuries of their oppression by Whites. As I pointed out in “The Bestial of British,” the truth is exactly the opposite. Britain is harmed by diversity and non-Whites are much more prone to criminality and psychopathy than Whites.

You can see that in Britain’s many meteor-murders, which is what I call a murder that flashes through the British media and then vanishes forever. The Black teenager Stephen Lawrence, who was murdered by Whites back in 1993, has returned again and again to the headlines, because his death can be used to demonize Whites and sanctify Blacks. Compare the White teenager Mary-Ann Leneghan, who was tortured, raped and murdered with extreme savagery by Blacks in 2006. That was a meteor-murder and she was forgotten long ago by the mainstream. So was the White teenager Kriss Donald, who was murdered with extreme savagery by Pakistani Muslims in 2005.

A laughing acid-thrower

The murders of Mary-Ann Leneghan and Kriss Donald provided vital lessons about non-White savagery and malice. That’s precisely why they are long-forgotten by the mainstream. The British media follow the agenda of the hostile elite, demonizing Whites, sanctifying non-Whites, and celebrating the steady and remorseless destruction of Britain’s traditions and culture. And in the same week as the wedding of “Harry and Meghan,” a far more significant story about Black-White relations was in the headlines. If the races and sexes had been reversed in this other story, the victim would have joined Stephen Lawrence as a permanent fixture in Britain’s political firmament. But the victim was a White male and the attacker was a Black female, so this will become yet another meteor-murder:

Woman found guilty of throwing sulphuric acid at former partner

A woman has been found guilty of an acid attack in Bristol that left her former partner with such terrible injuries that he was driven to euthanasia. Berlinah Wallace [a Black South African], 49, threw sulphuric acid over Mark van Dongen [a White Dutchman], 29, in a fit of jealousy and rage after he began a relationship with another woman. Bristol crown court heard that [in September 2015] Wallace, a former fashion student, hurled acid at Van Dongen, an engineer, as he lay in bed, laughing and taunting him: “If I can’t have you, no one else can.”

Van Dongen’s face and much of his body was severely scarred. The acid burned through 25% of his body surface. He was paralysed from the neck down, lost most of his sight and his lower left leg had to be amputated. He spent more than a year in hospital in Bristol before his family and friends hired a private ambulance to move him to Belgium, where he applied for euthanasia. …

Wallace bought the sulphuric acid — legally — online from Amazon for less than £10. [Mark van Dongen’s father] Kees van Dongen vowed to campaign to make sure the laws around the sale of acid are tightened. Amazon has declined to comment. A spate of acid attacks including the one on Van Dongen has led the government to move to reclassify sulphuric acid. Later this year it will only be possible to legally buy the substance over a certain concentration with a licence. The police’s actions before the attack will be scrutinised. It has emerged that Van Dongen was so worried about Wallace after they split that he contacted the police and an officer gave her a harassment warning. … (Woman found guilty of throwing sulphuric acid at former partner, The Guardian, 17th May 2018)

Berlinah Wallace was found “not guilty” of murder in the trial, but although that may have been legally correct, she was morally responsible for Mark van Dongen’s death. She set out to destroy his life and succeeded. And note this phrase at the end of the story: “A spate of acid attacks.” Why are such barbarous crimes happening so often in twenty-first-century Britain? Well, just like electoral corruption, they represent a triumph of liberalism. Anyone who has read the Sherlock Holmes story “The Adventure of the Illustrious Client” will know that acid-attacks were a problem here in the nineteenth century. Similarly, political cartoons by the great cartoonist James Gillray (1756?–1810) show that electoral corruption was a problem here too. But those problems went away as Britain became a more law-abiding and civilized country.

Non-White pathologies

Thanks to mass immigration from the Third World, those two problems we thought gone for ever have returned to blight the twenty-first century. And with them have come pathologies that never existed here, like suicide-bombing, rape-gangs, and female genital mutilation. Liberals import evil and call it enrichment. Acid-attacks are now overwhelmingly carried out by non-Whites in what is still a White-majority nation. But if Mark van Dongen had been the attacker and Berlinah Wallace the victim, can anyone doubt that the case would have held up by the liberal media as proof of White male evil and Black female victimhood? Like Stephen Lawrence, Berlinah Wallace would have become the centre of a permanent martyr-cult.

As it is, absolutely no racial conclusions have been drawn from Wallace’s savagery and van Dongen’s suffering. To the liberal media, Wallace is merely an anomalous individual whose psychopathic psychology owes nothing to her race. The mere suggestion of any link would elicit shrieks of horror and condemnation. But there is a remarkable parallel between what happened to Mark van Dongen in 2015 and what happened to a model called Katie Piper in 2008. In both cases, a naïve White entered a relationship with a jealous and possessive Black who reacted very badly when the White sought to end the relationship:

Kate Elizabeth Piper (born 12 October 1983) is an English philanthropist, television presenter and former model from Andover, Hampshire. Piper had hoped to have a full-time career in the media, but in March 2008 sulphuric acid was thrown in her face. The attack, which blinded Piper in one eye, was arranged by Piper’s [Black] ex-boyfriend Danny Lynch and carried out by an accomplice Stefan Sylvestre [also Black]; both men were arrested and are serving life sentences in prison with the possibility of parole. …

Daniel Lynch, a martial arts enthusiast who had been tracking Piper’s media and modelling career, met her through the online social site Facebook. Unknown to her, Lynch had previously been jailed for throwing boiling water into a man’s face. The two first met in person in Reading, Berkshire, where Piper had been working, and initially Piper was pleased with the relationship.

Two weeks into their relationship, the couple booked into a hotel in Bayswater, following a meal out. In the hotel room, Lynch raped and beat Piper, threatened to cut her with a razor and hang her, and stabbed her several times in the arms. After eight hours at the hotel, they drove back to Piper’s Golders Green flat. Piper was treated for her wounds at Royal Free Hospital, but withheld the nature of the incident from the doctors and police, because she was afraid of Lynch.

Piper received numerous phone calls and apologies from Lynch. On 31 March 2008, two days after the initial attack, Lynch persuaded Piper to go to an internet cafe to read an email he had sent to her Facebook account. Lynch gave her details to Stefan Sylvestre, who identified her on Golders Green Road. Wearing a hoodie to obscure his identity, Sylvestre approached Piper, who thought he was going to ask for money, and then threw sulphuric acid at her face. (Katie Piper at Infogalactic)

In some ways, the Black Stefan Sylvestre is even more psychologically remarkable than the Black Berlinah Wallace. She threw acid out of jealousy and rage; he threw acid as a favour to a friend. Unlike Mark van Dongen, Katie Piper survived the attack and has since become famous in Britain as a “survivor” of male violence (not Black male violence). At the time of the attack, the late great Larry Auster oversaw an interesting discussion of what happened to her. He noted that Piper herself and the liberal British media drew no racial conclusions from the horror inflicted on her. To Piper and the media, Daniel Lynch and Stefan Sylvestre are anomalous individuals who fit no racial pattern and prove nothing about any threat posed by non-Whites to Whites.

The Eloi and the Morlocks

Indeed, Piper’s own autobiography makes no mention of Lynch’s and Sylvestre’s race in its detailed account of the crime. Very foolishly, she doesn’t regard their race as important. Auster was sympathetic to her suffering but despaired at her foolishness, classifying her among what he called the Eloi, after a race of future humans in H.G. Wells’ The Time Machine (1895).  The Eloi are the good-looking, hedonistic and sun-loving prey of a grim underground race called the Morlocks. For Eloi, read “Whites”; for Morlocks, read “Blacks.” Auster added Katie Piper to a long list he compiled of Whites who have been murdered or badly injured by Blacks and other non-Whites. Another British entry in the list is particularly worthy of mention:

Britain + Blacks = Ben Kinsella dead [June, 2009. Photos of Ben Kinsella and the three demi-humans who took his life. “What do I mean by the title of this entry? Do I mean that all blacks, or most blacks, or a large minority of blacks are killers? Of course not. Do I want white people to hate or even dislike blacks in general? Absolutely not. It nevertheless remains a simple fact that blacks are almost an order of magnitude more violent than other races when it comes to such crimes as murder, rape, and armed robbery. To import a black population into a previously all-white country is to consign a large number of whites in that country, year after year, generation after generation, to violent death at the hands of blacks.”] (Black and other nonwhite violence against whites: a grim collection, Larry Auster, first posted 12th August 2008)

Larry Auster was a great man who, despite his liberal Jewish background, saw through the lies of liberalism and fought for the truth. Although he often criticized Kevin MacDonald, at the end of his life he published an article, “Jews — The Archetypal Multiculturalists,” more or less accepting that MacDonald was right. Auster himself was right in what he wrote above: Whites should not hate “Blacks in general,” but we should not live with them either. What happened to Mark van Dongen and Katie Piper is an extreme example of why Whites and Blacks should have separate nations.

The marriage of Prince Harry and Megan Markle, by contrast, was an exercise in lying state propaganda. Here again are Larry Auster’s words: “To import a black population into a previously all-white country is to consign a large number of whites in that country, year after year, generation after generation, to violent death at the hands of blacks.” But it is not simply Blacks who pose that threat, nor is violent death the only harm inflicted on Whites. We also bear the huge costs of rape-gangs, in-breeding, exotic diseases, benefit fraud and political corruption. Britain was once an all-White country; now it has a large and growing non-White population. The consequences for ordinary Whites have been horrific and will not end until Britain becomes an all-White country again. After that, we need to punish the traitors responsible both for importing non-Whites and for lying about the joys of a racially mixed society.

71 replies
  1. William Jones
    William Jones says:

    In addition, to arrange for dark-skin people to inhabit an area in the northern latitudes infringes evolutionary characteristics. The incapacity to create vitamin D from the available levels of sunlight will eventuallly lead to a sickness-prone section of the population

    • Barkingmad
      Barkingmad says:

      I am not defending the relocation of darkskinned people into northern latitudes, but it must be said that there are plenty of white people residing in the same areas who also just don’t get enough Vit. D from the sun and who suffer mightily for it.

      When the sun is direct enough, in the summer, at certain times of day, even then you have to remove a lot of your clothing to get enough exposure. This might not go over well with law enforcement. To add insult to injury, we are strongly encouraged to wear sunscreen on sunny days. Such madness.

      If you go to vitamindcouncil.org, you can get all the gen you need there. There is plenty of proof that so many of our health problems are directly related to Vitamin D deficiency. However, supplementation over time can reverse these problems, or at least some of them.

      While I’m here – I think it might be equally unhealthy for light skinned folks to live near the equator. Let’s all go back to our homelands.

      • Troy
        Troy says:

        This is entirely correct, but it’s not a biological problem – it’s a problem with our ‘civilization’. We just don’t spend enough time outdoors, and it’s simply not always a case of being chained to an office cubicle or slaving under the huge artificially lighting of the giant retail store; there are too many white people who simply don’t have the will to go outdoors, and frankly a lot of that is due to so much of our natural greenlands being cemented over. If one is unlucky enough to live in a modern city or large town and is not in a moderate to high income bracket, then their location is like living under a giant black parasol. It’s a complex problem, and one that won’t be corrected at least until our so-called ‘civilization’ is a smouldering ruin, because the wheels of modern mass industrialism have been turning for such a very long time now that we will simply have to wait until those who ‘oil’ them disappear and the wheels of “the machine” (as William G Simpson called it) begin to rust and eventually fall apart (or are picked apart). We can only hope that when that time comes, and it could be as much as 200 or 300 years into the future, that there will still be a sizeable cadre of high quality pure-bred white people around to plant new seeds into the rotting wasteland.

      • William Jones
        William Jones says:

        “Let’s all go back to our homelands” Quite right. If we live in a zone that evolutionary development did not intend then we will suffer the consequences. For instance: two out of three White Australians, after the age of 50, suffer some form of skin cancer. Blacks living in northern latitudes can only do so by constant medication. However, this artificial treatment risks the inevitability of vitamin D toxicity in later life. (The natural – sunlight – process switches off when sufficient levels of vitamin D is created.)

  2. Edward Brown
    Edward Brown says:

    As regards Lawrence Auster I think people here should read TANSTAAFL’s writing about him at age of treason blog. The funny thing is TAN started off as a liberal and Auster was one of his waystations to the alt right before TAN saw through him as just another jewish gatekeeper

    • Nick Dean
      Nick Dean says:

      Seconded. Auster was no friend of ours and Tanstaafl thoroughly exposed him as a Jew firster and Jew onlyer. It all somehow slips by Langdon …

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      Curmudgeon: I had to stop the video midway because the pain in my chest from laughing was becoming scary.

      I had heard it said that the black preacher was a disgrace, but I never imagined that his carryings-on—even making due allowance for the overdubbing—might be as absurd and distasteful as the video shows they were.

      I pray that the divorce or annulment or whatever comes before those two screwed-up brats have a brood of mongrel kids.

      • Curmudgeon
        Curmudgeon says:

        Friend Pierre,
        This pair having a brood is a scary thought. At 36 and a (((Hollywood starlet))) she has to have been on more “dates” than an Amsterdam hooker, and may well be a walking bio-hazard. God only knows what she’s carrying. Perhaps this is a Spencer revenge on the Windsors/ Battenbergs.
        Are you craving a hot dog yet?

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          Ah, the Earl Spencer. Now there’s a piece of work if ever there was one. I still wonder at times whether I was alone in finding his behavior at Diana’s funeral appalling, quite as appalling as the black preacher’s at Harry’s probably temporary hook-up.

          Now that I think on it, perhaps Spencer’s the one who should have married your “walking bio-hazard.” (A tip of the hat to you, my friend, for that delightful turn of phrase. I fully expect to be repeating it soon without proper source acknowledgment.)

  3. Peter G.
    Peter G. says:

    GOOD TO SEE MENTION OF KRISS DONALD AND BEN KINSELLA. HERE ARE A FEW MORE WHITE TEENAGERS MURDERED BY BLACKS AND ASIANS.
    Alan Cartwright, 15, Islington, N.London, 27 Feb 2015
    Jordan Brennan,17, Gorton, Manchester, 10 Oct 2014.
    Charlie Burns, 19, Hackney, N.London, 21 Aug 2014.
    Kieran Raiswell, 18, Whalley Range, Manchester, 16 Jan 2013. Thomas Overton, 18, Leyton, E.London, 19 Aug 2012. Danny O’Shea, 18, Canning Town, E.London, 2 Dec 2011. Nicholas Pearton, 16, Sydenham, S.E.London, May 2010. Martin Bilaszewski, 19, Finsbury Park station, N.London. 6 May 2010.
    Ben Kinsella, 16, Islington, N.London, 29 June 2008.
    Jimmy Mizen, 16, Lee, S.E.London, May 2008.
    Robert Knox, 18, Sidcup, Kent. May 2008.
    Alex Holroyd, 19, Bradford, Yorks. Jan. 2008
    Jack Large, 14, Grange Hill, Essex. 30 Nov 2007.
    Stuart Lowe, 18, Warrington, Lancs, 17 Oct. 2007.
    Andrew Holland, 16, Farnworth near Bolton, Lancs, 17 Aug 2007. Martin Dinnegan, 14, Holloway, N.London , 26 June 2007. Ben Hitchcock, 16, Beckenham, S.London, 23 June 2007. Kenneth Cole, 13, Burnley, Lancs,14 Feb. 2007. Ian Page, 19, Colindale, N.W.London, 12 Nov. 2006. David Strizegauskas, 13, Upton Park, E.London, 27 Apr 2006. Christopher Davis, 17, Barking, E.London 19 Jan. 2006. Jason Mayze, 16, St Helens, Liverpool, 13 Jan 2006. Ben Bellamy, 17, Swansea, South Wales, Sept. 2005. Kris Donald, 15, Glasgow, Scotland,15 March 2004. Jason Ripley, 17, Huddersfield, Yorks, Feb 2004. Ashley Hedger, 16, Upton Park, London, 16 Jan 2004. Terry Gregory, 19, Woolwich, S.E.London, 28 Dec 2003. Sean Whyte, 17, Colne, Lancs. 29 Sept. 2003. Gavin Hopley, 19, Oldham, Lancs, 16 Feb 2002. Owain Leeson, 17, Sheffield, Yorks, 14 Feb 2002. Ross Parker, 17, Peterborough, Cambs, 23 Sept 2001. Liam Gall, 18, Redditch, Worcs, 26 Sept. 2000. Jonathan Coles, 18, Newport Pagnell, Bucks, 11 June 1999. Jamie Robe, 17, Rotherhithe, E.London, August 1997. Andrew Steventon, 17, Birmingham, June 1996. Danny Westmacott, 16, Edmonton, London, 8 Feb 1996. Michael Dooher, 19, Lichfield, Staffordshire, 2 Sept. 1995. Richard Everitt, 15, Kings Cross, London, August 1994. Philip Gosling, 13, Handsworth, Birmingham, Feb. 1994. Raymond Kelly, 17, Hartley Wintney, Hants. 1 Feb. 1991. Stuart Gough,14, Hagley, Worcs, 17 Jan. 1988. Sean Keynes,15, Lozells, Birmingham, 22 May 1986.
    Robert Vaughan, 17. Southwark, S.London, 4 Feb. 1984.
    Colin Reid, 18, Hitchin, Herts, 8 Oct 1983. Terry May, 19, Thornton Heath, Surrey, 1 June 1981. John Hunt, 18, Middlesborough, Tyne and Wear, 19 Aug. 1961.

    • T.Gilligan
      T.Gilligan says:

      Peter, A great list in memoriam to the prematurely snuffed out lives by the most futile of ‘humans’. Another murder victim for your list. In July 2005, a man Richard Whelan remonstrated with a dislocated Jamaican, Anthony Joseph 23, who had been released from prison that day, for throwing food-chips at his girlfriend. Richard was stabbed 6 times. Jamaican Joseph pleaded guilty to manslaughter and the jury failed to reach a verdict on murder.

      • T.Gilligan
        T.Gilligan says:

        Further to my previous post, Richard Whelan was killed on a number 43 bus via its route along Holloway Road in North London and the resultant trail verdict was for manslaughter.
        I would really love to see a black marble plinth with all the names of the victims embossed in gold to signify the loss ( and much more) to the nation.
        Meanwhile, heard on the radio station this morning: Nick Ferrari discussing cycle lanes in London that there are ‘too many white men in lycra’; casual anti-white racism rears its ugly head at every opportunity.

    • Paul Hausser
      Paul Hausser says:

      Oh my God Peter! This is incredible! I had no idea. I am profoundly saddened. Bless the victims and bless you for keeping them in our heart! Tears in my eyes

  4. The Other George
    The Other George says:

    “A spate of acid attacks.” Why are such barbarous crimes happening so often in twenty-first-century Britain? Well, just like electoral corruption, they represent a triumph of liberalism.”

    A triumph of liberalism? You are over complicating this. These attacks happen for three reason;

    1) The Whites do not have firearms to protect themselves with.

    2) The Blacks and Browns realize that the repercussions for their actions will be minimal.

    3) The Blacks and Browns hate Whites for being everything that they are not: Creative, intelligent, beautiful (especially many of our blonde women). So then, acid is perfect for their intended use. It disfigures, it blinds the victim making it likely that the perpetrator cannot be identified, and the effects are permanent, albeit usually not life threatening.

    • Floda
      Floda says:

      Yes, I’m afraid you’re right, the same thing is happening in Germany. Yesterday a huge demonstration by thousands of protesters at No.10 Downing Street. They were outraged at the arrest of Tommy Robinson whose ‘crime’ was letting people know a secret trial involving Muslims grooming young white English girls was taking place in a London court.

      It seems the Brit Government has made publicizing sex trials involving Muslims a crime. Robinson was sentenced to 13 months, there are fears he will be killed by Muslim gangs in prison. The crowd was incensed by the fact the Government
      issued a ‘D notice’ to the media ordering them to keep the matter of the arrest a secret.

      The Home Secretary, the official responsible for this outrage , is an Indian Waller with the moniker of Sajid Javid. I see the first glimmer of a British ‘Ceausescu moment’ in this. A UKIP House of Lords Peer has warned the Indian Waller he will be charged should Tommy Robinson be murdered in Prison.

      If that happens there will be real trouble.

  5. Caroline Jones
    Caroline Jones says:

    I think that there must be some kind of mental disorder in any white person who enters into an intimate relationship with a negro. In the case of Mark Van Dongen entering into a relationship with a hideous looking negress 20 years older than himself, he was either literally blind or blinded by some kind of sick liberalism or plagued by an extreme form of self-hatred. As for the case of Kate Elizabeth Piper, after the acid attack, she has married another negro. This woman is severely addled in the brain. I have no pity for either Van Dongen or Piper, the evidence is all around them to show what negroes are really like

    • Lou
      Lou says:

      Nookie is nookie. VD was young, too young too die.
      Why didnt he have HER killed? Ask yrself that.

  6. Paul Bustion
    Paul Bustion says:

    It has been stated that the British Royal Family already has Negro African ancestry. I do not know if the statement is true or not, but it has been stated that King George IIIs wife Charlotte Mecklenberg was partly of Negro African ancestry. Wikipedia states: ‘cording to Mario de Valdes y Cocom, Charlotte may have had African ancestry, via descent from Margarita de Castro e Souza, a 15th-century Portuguese noblewoman, who traced her ancestry to King Afonso III of Portugal (1210–1279) and one of his mistresses, Madragana (c. 1230–?).[37]

    In a 2009 episode of the PBS TV series, Frontline, Valdes speculated that Scottish painter Allan Ramsay emphasized the Queen’s alleged “mulatto” appearance in his portrait of her to support the anti-slave trade movement, and noted that Baron Stockmar had described the Queen as having a “mulatto face” in his autobiography and that other contemporary sources made similar observations.’ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charlotte_of_Mecklenburg-Strelitz&type=revision&diff=843423352&oldid=843124147 I suppose if it is true that they have Negro African ancestry it makes it less surprising that one of them would be drawn to an African for his spouse.

    • Franklin Ryckaert
      Franklin Ryckaert says:

      If the British Royal family’s “negro blood” goes back to Portugal’s King Alfonso III (1210-1279) mistress Madragana (c. 1230?), then assuming that she was a full blooded negress but afterward no new negro blood was added to later generations, we are talking about 31 generations of dilution of that negro blood to 1/3,147,483,648th part. I think such a small amount can be safely neglected.

      • Paul Bustion
        Paul Bustion says:

        I suppose thats a fair point. But Ive noticed some of the the British royal family have thick lips and prognathism (projecting lower jaws). Those things would suggest some non-Nordic ancestry. Those features are more common in Africans and in southeastern Europeans, eastern Europeans, Jews and Arabs than in Nordic people. It could point to one or more of the latter rather than to the former as ancestry though. So it doesnt necessarily indicate African ancestry. I saw a thread once on Stormfront suggesting the Russian royal family the Romanovs (who are related to the British royal family) had Jewish ancestry. I dont know enough to conclude if they did or not but they do seem to have some Jewish features to me like thin upper and thick lower lips and frizzy or wooly hair, https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t775746/

          • Paul Bustion
            Paul Bustion says:

            Even David Duke said in an interview with Phil Donahue in 1992 ‘I dont think racial puritys a viable concept’. By which he meant theres been so much interbreeding that no person is completely purely of the ancestry of one race. So every White person has at least one drop, so to speak, of Non-White blood.

        • Lou
          Lou says:

          Obamas media push showed us that. His was 53% afro, or some such…even his mama was mixed.

      • Walraven
        Walraven says:

        Madragana was a Moorish woman, that would indicate a Berber (North Africans are also Caucasian) or Arab background, not a black.

  7. tadzio308
    tadzio308 says:

    The French experience in North Africa is instructive. From the 1840s onward Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia were objects of French migration called the Pieds noir. In the 1920s Europeans as a percentage of the population in Algeria peaked at c. 15.2%. This declined as the benefits of European health policies that lessened the death rates of the natives took hold and the higher birth rates of the Arabs kicked in.

    The presence of the non-Africans was swiftly obliterated in the early 1960s when the Europeans were reduced to a negligible portion.

    The experience of this Pieds Noir demographic can be seen not as a defeat but as a pathway for Europe. Self deportation worked. It can work again in the White homelands. La Valise ou le Cercueil, (the suitcase or the coffin), posters told the story. All that is necessary is for the intruding population be given a convincing argument to leave and they will. Terrorism worked in North Africa and it can in White countries.

    The bloodshed was in fact minimal considering the numbers involved. In the US E-Verify for employment, coupled with harsh treatment of non-compliant employers, would do much to stem the flow from the American nations to the South. In Europe other methods might persuade migrants to turn homeward.

    My favorite fantasy is a Snip-Snip campaign. It would consist of posters promising castration to outsiders. You can stay but you can’t…. (North Africans used to do this to Black slaves to protect the Arab people from miscegenation).
    Once the idea that it would happen spreads no surgery would be required. What part of their anatomy do military age, or any age, do males feel most protective towards? Convince all the young, vibrant, military age, single emigres that they may soon be clucking like hens and they will go, hands frantically clasping their private parts.

    Do not abandon hope. Migration has a long history of being reversed. Consider the fate of the Pieds Noir. We can, and I believe will, do it.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      This is a highly valuable and insightful comment, especially in that it locates useful instruction in an area where one is unlikely to think to seek it. Thank you very much, tadzio.

  8. Philip Smeeton
    Philip Smeeton says:

    I agree entirely whites and blacks or muslims cannot mix. There will be ethnic conflict where this is tried.

  9. Paul Bustion
    Paul Bustion says:

    This marriage is a mistake. Even the Irish Roman Catholics could not be assimilated into British society when Ireland was part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland, the racial, religious and initially linguistic diversity between the Irish Roman Catholics who were Irish speaking until the 1850s and the Anglo-Saxon Protestants made both sides hate each other. The British government did not provide as much help as it could to the Irish Catholic peasantry during the Irish Potato Famine because of this animosity, and the Irish Catholics later developed a ridiculous belief that the Famine had been a conspiracy by the British government to genocide them. There were constant rebellions against British rule by the Irish Catholics, and the Irish nationalist members of the British Parliament constantly obstructed legislation. There would not be the conflicts between Roman Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland if not for the religious diversity there and the historical British colonization of Ireland. None of that would have happened if England and Ireland had always been completely separate countries, then they would both be homogenous countries with homogenous populations without hatred of each other or diversity causing tension. If this is the kind of tension that Ireland being part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and the Irish and British being in each others societies caused, when the Anglo-Saxons and the Irish are both White Europeans, then the amount of tension that Negro Africans who are not even White are going to bring to British society if imported in large numbers can only be imagined. This is especially true when a Negro African marries into the royal family, which brings the issue right into the open and bothers staunch White racialists and while being cheered for by Negroes, Jewish Leftists and others who benefit from multiculturalism and multiracialism. This will tear British society apart. Recently I wanted to get a job at a Mexican restaurant but my parents opposed my working there because they dislike Mexicans. If we had a 100% Caucasian, 100% western values oriented, 100% English speaking America then there would not have been a Mexican where I applied but instead an Anglo-Saxon restaurant that my parents would have supported my working at. This shows the drawbacks of diversity. Diversity reduces social cohesion, it makes people hate each other. It leads to greater unemployment.

    • Charlie
      Charlie says:

      ” the Irish Catholics later developed a ridiculous belief that the Famine had been a conspiracy by the British government to genocide them”

      Facts are not a conspiracy theory

      • Paul Bustion
        Paul Bustion says:

        The British spent millions of pounds on famine relief efforts during the Famine. They set up public work houses to help the Irish. They let Irish immigration to Great Britain itself during the Famine. The parts of Ireland that were most hurt during the Famine were on the western seaboard, the parts least hurt were in northeast in Ulster and on the eastern seaboard, especially Dublin was not hurt. Ive looked at the statistics in a book about the Famine by James Donnelly. The rate of deaths, rate of eviction, rate of emigration and population decrease was highest in the western seaboard and lowest in Ulster and on the eastern seaboard, the only part of Ireland that had a population increase during the Famine was Dublin. This is all evidence against the idea the Famine was a genocide by the British government because the eastern seaboard of Ireland and Ulster were the parts of Ireland most colonized by the British, where the British government had the most actual interaction with the Irish people living there, the western seaboard was the part of Ireland where the British authorities interacted the least with the Irish people and where the Irish people were most isolated from the British. If the Famine were a genocide, then the parts of Ireland most impacted by British rule would have been the parts hurt worst by the Famine, but it was the exact opposite, the parts of Ireland where the Famine was worst were the parts most isolated from the British. Queen Victoria gave 2,000 pounds as charity relief during the Famine, while she should have given more, that is a substantial contribution, is not a ridiculously low contribution like Abraham Lincolns contribution of 10 dollars was. The British did not do enough to help during the Famine, and one of the reasons was Anti-Catholic bigotry, another racism against the Irish, but they were not trying to genocide the Irish. This ridiculous conspiracy theory is largely promoted by Irish nationalists as a means of getting the British to feel sorry for the Irish and make concessions to them on issues for example relating to Northern Ireland. Its also to a lesser extent promoted by Jewish Marxist intellectuals as a means of getting the British to hate themselves and as a means of villifying European colonialism. Even today, the western seaboard of Ireland is generally the poorest part of the island, and the eastern seaboard is generally the wealthiest part of the island. If British rule had been consistently extremely oppressive, it would be the other way around.

        • T
          T says:

          They let Irish immigration to Great Britain itself during the Famine.

          Immigration from Ireland due to the Famine was encouraged, not just to Britain, but to other points of the Empire as well, ie Australia and Canada, but, most of all, to the United States. The Irish during the Famine years of the latter 1840’s lost roughly the same number of people due to mass immigration, one million, as it did to starvation. However, the Irish decidedly did not see this encouraged large scale exodus of their people as ‘a helping hand’, but rather saw it as a genocidal act of enmasse predation, a hand being placed around their throat and squeezed hard. No doubt the Irish were open to legitimate help to alleviate the immediate effects of the Famine, but they didn’t see the encouragement of their people being wage slaves (ie ‘cheap labor’ so called) across the globe, most never to see Ireland ever again, as helping them. As documented in 1847 by The Spectator of London the Irish called this type of supposed help ‘extermination’, and members of the British aristocracy whom at the time were promoting the mass exodus of the Irish as wage slaves to places such as the United States were actively being shot in Ireland for doing so.

          The Irish population to this day hasn’t recovered from the encouraged predation of the 19th and 20th century as ‘immigrants’ (ie wage slaves) to other countries. Perversely, Ireland is now being flooded with ‘immigrants’ (ie ‘cheap laborers’, fraudulent ‘asylum seekers’, ‘refugees’, etc) as Ireland’s population is said to be ‘too low’.

          Such is the conduct which the Irish incendiaries name ‘extermination’.

          Extermination and Vengeance

          The case of Mr. Ormsby Gore is very instructive. The Irish papers, alluding to his estate of Leganommer, had a terrific story of “extermination in Leitrim,” full of direct falsehoods. Setting aside smaller matters, it appears that the tenants on the estate owed rent for several years, in some instances for as many as twelve or fourteen; one year’s rent was demanded, under pain of a twelve month’s notice to quit, not a shilling of rent was offered, and the notice was enforced; but the enforcement was accompanied with a declaration that those who could not retain their holdings would be aided by their landlord to emigrate to America. Such is the conduct which the Irish in- cendiaries name “extermination.”

          http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/20th-november-1847/12/extermination-and-vengeance

          • T
            T says:

            One of the great failures within the Anglosphere countries has been the failure to succesfully separate from their slavery addicted and corrupted elites and hangers on. Whether that slavery was chattel or its monetization, wage slavery ie. ‘cheap labor’ so called, this holds true. The below excerpts were taken from debate on immigration into Ireland in the Seanad Éireann (the Irish Senate) located in Dublin, Ireland, a non-Anglosphere country, on May 11, 2006. The comments can be found two thirds of the way down on the link provided below. The names White and Bradford would appear to be Anglo-Saxon names. Though no doubt what they are saying, or something like it, has been said by members of the British Parliament in London regarding the native English and ‘immigrants’ displacing them there, bad enough, but this is in Dublin in the Irish Senate house where the interest of the Irish people are supposed to be being represented. The entire testimony on ‘migration’ into Ireland on that day is worth the time to read as it is telling.

            It may not be politically correct to say so but it is a major contrast to our [Irish] workers.

            Seanad Éireann – May 11, 2006

            Ms White: ..Immigrants here work in restaurants, hotels, shops, IT customer support companies and on building sites. I find them an inspiration. Their work ethic, dedication and enthusiasm in customer service is outstanding. It may not be politically correct to say so but it is a major contrast to our workers. Last night on the way home I went into a beauty salon in Dundrum at around 8.45 p.m. An advertisement for a new service was displayed and I went in——

            Mr. Bradford: There is no need for the Senator to go there.

            Ms White: I thank Senator Bradford for the courtesy. I went into the salon and there were four Irish girls behind the counter who told me the salon was closed. I said I wanted to make an appointment but they said they had nothing available until next week. This was Wednesday night. We all know that foreign people working in shops, or the service industry generally, cannot wait to pack the bags properly and so on…

            Mrs White continues on in her testimony, again at Irish expense.

            They dote upon their slaves.

            The standard of service has increased greatly because of the work ethic of our immigrants…I asked my daughter where they [the Chinese] got their work ethic and she said that under Mao all they were allowed to do was work.

            Seanad Éireann – May 11, 2006

            Ms White – The Minister for Arts, Sport and Tourism, Deputy O’Donoghue, made a good point recently about the Ryder Cup tournament, to be held in the autumn. He said that he hopes we give good service and value for money to the visitors who will come here for that event and not exploit them. The standard of service has increased greatly because of the work ethic of our immigrants. My image of Chinese people was that, under communist rule, they did what they were told; it was the ultimate in bureaucracy. I asked my daughter where they got their work ethic and she said that under Mao all they were allowed to do was work. These immigrants are the children of people who lived under Mao, who made them work. It was the other extreme with Mao, as we know, but it was an interesting point.

            https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/seanad/2006-05-11/4/

      • Lou
        Lou says:

        Irish Catholics later developed a ridiculous belief that the Famine had been a conspiracy by the British government to genocide them

        –PB is a fool.

        • Paul Bustion
          Paul Bustion says:

          Its really a bit rich that some of the same people who not only doubt the Holocaust happened but consider the proposition that Hitlers government wanted to exterminate European Jewry absurd consider it a reasonable belief to believe that the British government in the 1840s/1850s was trying to exterminate Irish Roman Catholics. Its especially ridiculous given the extreme altruism of the British government of the time. The British government outlawed the slave trade in all British territories in 1807 and outlawed slavery in most British territories in 1833. By 1845 when the Famine started it had outlawed slavery in all British territories. The British government not only did this, but also embarked on a crusade against the slave trade and slavery, using its Royal Navy to stop the slave trade, and leading an international crusade against slavery and the slave trade. Later on one of its main motives in colonizing Africa was to stop slavery/the slave trade there, it chaired international anti-slavery/anti-slave trade conferences and at the Berlin Conference in the 1880s they supported the Belgian King Leopold IIs bid to colonize the Congo because of his stated intent to use the colonization project to help stop slavery and the slave trade in Africa. The British had friction with the Afrikaners in South Africa because in the 1830s they forced the Afrikaners to give up their aboriginal African slaves. And the British later had conflict with the Afrikaners there over the British desire to uphold aboriginal African rights against the colonization of the Afrikaners. The British improved the literacy, nutrition, health care and living standards of all their subject peoples, even the Black African and SouthEast Asian ones. If they were this altruistic towards people who were not even European, then its not reasonable to believe they would have a secret genocide plot against the Irish who were European.

          • T
            T says:

            …consider it a reasonable belief to believe that the British government in the 1840s/1850s was trying to exterminate Irish Roman Catholics.

            Regarding the potato blight, as far as I know I doubt anyone has suggested it was developed in an underground London laboratory to be unleashed upon the unsuspecting Irish farmer, but rather there is a concern with how Ireland and the Irish people had been made vulnerable to such a disaster having been reduced to a state of over reliance upon a single food crop for sustenance (ie the potato) while under British occupation and administration and the response by that administration to the successive crop losses due to the said blight. Regarding the accusation of ‘extermination’ you’d have to speak to the Irish of 1847 as documented by The Spectator whom decidedly did not see the ‘help’ of having their way paid to leave Ireland typically for a period of forever (apparently this was occurring in great number as a quarter million Irish were fleeing Ireland yearly at this time) thus being removed, also forever, out of the land lord’s hair. You’d also have to speak to the editorial writer(s) of the London Times whom at the tail end of the Famine period entirely concurred with the Irish assessment of ‘extermination’ regarding the then still strong encouraged exodus of the Irish from Ireland to places such as the US to be wage slaves there, declaring that this would directly result in the Irish being ‘known no more’ as a people. At the time this editorial linked below was published on September 30, 1851, Ireland and the Irish people, having lost two million of its population in the previous five years from famine or the encouraged immigration from Ireland, looked ‘done for’. Bear in mind, London Times editorials are not just any British journalism as they have long been seen as a mouth piece for official British government thought regarding policy. The editorial described the then US ambassador Abbott Lawrence and his visit to Ireland. Not coincidental in this, Abbott Lawrence was a Massachusetts textile factory magnate whom had just recently constructed his self named industrial town of Lawrence, Mass, officially nick named to this day ‘Immigrant City’. The Irish people were a primary source of wage slaves (ie ‘cheap laborers’ so called) for his textile plants.

            According to the editorial, the indigenous Irish will soon all be gone from Ireland, either having left in the encouraged mass ‘immigration’ and thus ‘mixed’ out of existance or dead from the famine. Where the Irish had once been in Ireland they are to be replaced by the forced upon Ireland immigrants in the north of Ireland and the resulting mixed population there, ie the historic Plantatation population. The Times describes the people in the north as a race of slaves, ie ‘more mixed, more docile’ and ‘which can submit to a master’ much unlike the more purely Celtic population on the rest of the island.

            It [the Irish] will mix with the Anglo-American, and be known no more as a jealous and separate people.

            Its [the Irish people’s] present place [in Ireland] will be occupied by the more mixed, more docile, and more serviceable race, which has long borne the yoke of sturdy industry in this island, which can submit to a master and obey the law…

            The American Minister in Ireland

            pg 290 – 291 as republished on November 15, 1851, in Littell’s Living Age

            ‘The prosperity and happiness he [Lawrence] speaks of may some day reign over that beautiful island. It’s fertile soil, its water-power, its minerals, and other materials for the wants and luxuries of man, may one day be developed; but all apearances are against the belief that this will ever happen in the days of the Celt. That tribe will soon fulfill the great law of Providence which seems to enjoin and reward the union of races. It will mix with the Anglo-American, and be known no more as a jealous and separate people. Its present place will be occupied by the more mixed, more docile, and more serviceable race, which has long borne the yoke of sturdy industry in this island, which can submit to a master and obey the law…’

            And if you can’t get enough of the slaves to come to you, you go directly to where the slaves are, in this instance, British occupied and famine stricken Ireland. As outlined in The Spectator on June 22, 1850 plans have been announced to move US manufacturing plants to Ireland most likely to pay the prostate Irish the 19th century equivelant of the ten cents an hour they pay the prostate Chinese in Red China today.

            …this encouragement of low wages, this British substitute for “slave-labour…

            American Factories in Ireland

            A Protectionist Nemesis is prophesied in the form of the most singular invasion ever threatened to Great Britain—an invasion of American manufacturers, who are to set up factories in the West of Ireland, to compete with the factories of Lancashire, and to se- cure a larger consumption of American cotton…

            …But were it practicable and true, how is it that we find a Protectionist advocating the wholesale invasion of foreign enterprise, this competition with “native industry,” this encouragement of low wages, this British substitute for “slave-labour” ? The oblivion of principles is as striking a part of the dream as any.

            Chattel slavery and it trade was quite literally and simply monetized with the introduction of the wage slavery system to the world in the latter 18th and early 19th century by the slave dealers of the British Empire, ie ‘cheap labor’ so called and its accompanying ‘mass immigration’. By selling people on wage slavery not having certain historical peripheral aspects of chattel slavery, such as being at times race specific with chains and whips, etc, all while the core characteristics remain such as broken and defeated peoples being the primary source of this modern slavery whom now often have the indignity of paying their own way to the former would be slave dealer to transport them God knows where to have their labor systematically stolen, while the former would be slave owners get their ‘hit’ of paying significantly below the real time prevailing local cost of labor, all they had ultimately cared about anyway with chattel slavery, a prevailing local wage that under normal circumstances without slavery they would typically pay to their own people. For whatever period of time, days, weeks, months, years, the ‘immigrant’ is paid significantly below what was or would of been the local real time prevailing cost of labor without the immigrant being present or the immigration taking place, the immigrant is the slave. It might be in time that the ‘immigrant’ wants higher pay and chooses to go elsewhere for work. That’s perfectly okay with such an employer as they just hire another ‘immigrant’ of the hundreds of thousands, if not millions, entering the country legally or illegally, it not being called ‘mass immigration’ for nothing. The general public is royally screwed in every way with this modern manifestation of slavery, much more destructive and virulent than the already ghastly chattel slavery, ie depressed wages, scarcity of jobs, their ultimate displacement culturally, economically, and physically, their genocide. The world got sold ‘a bill of goods’, a decidedly poisonous one at that.

            The British Empire then with its chattel slavery, and now in the form of the Anglosphere with its wage slavery, continues to dominate the global trade in slaves. The multicultural society therefore closely parallels the chattel slave holding society it evolved from. The systematic theft of labor is a primary source of the multicultural societys wealth as well as its political power by the use of those people so exploited in divide and conquer strategies against foreign peoples and against its own within the Anglosphere by the powers that be. The suppression of chattel slavery by the British Empire coinciding with the introduction of wage slavery to the world was reflective of a desire to suppress competition with this new global slavery system. Besides that, chattel and wage slavery had been tried side by side in the pre US Civil War south and had been found not to work (the less educated chattel slaves were found to get rebellious ideas from the better educated wage slaves, ie the ‘cheap laborers’) and was commented upon in southern journals.

            The Big Lie, the lie of the millenium, was the 19th century abolition of slavery.

            The service operated by Nourse Line was a virtual round the world voyage, initially sailing from London for European ports where a general cargo was loaded before heading for Calcutta. After discharging its cargo, a cargo of rice would be back loaded, and her passengers of coolies would embark for the voyage out to the West Indies, Mauritius or Fiji.

            Sadly the term ‘Coolie’ became synonymous with cheap labour and they did in fact replace the African slaves whose use was outlawed in British possessions in 1834.

            Having observed the carriage and possible profits to be gained from the carriage of “Coolies” James Nourse entered into negotiations with the Crown Agents for the Colonies, his proposed service was to be between India and Mauritius, the West Indies and Fiji. Once the contracts were secured James Nourse bought India, an iron barque of 912 tons from Cowie & Company of Liverpool and chartered from T.O. Harrison of London, the Adamant in 1865. By way of explanation, a Coolie was of Indian or Chinese nationality, indentured labourers, who were hired for work in foreign lands, the word Coolie is traceable to a tribe from the West of India known as the Koli. Sadly the term became synonymous with cheap labour and they did in fact replace the African slaves whose use was outlawed in British possessions in 1834. In the main James Nourse’s passengers came from north central and northeastern India though some came from the Tamil and Telugu speaking regions of the south. The terms of contract were that they agreed to work for a defined number of years, five, in one of the colonies and in return they earned return passage but were paid extremely low wages, but, perhaps more importantly, were fed and housed. The Chinese Coolies were employed under exactly the same terms and it should come as no surprise to anyone that this form of indentured labour explains why the Indians and Chinese populate virtually every country in the world.

            https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=chi.55226263;view=1up;seq=302;skin=mobile

            http://archive.spectator.co.uk/article/22nd-june-1850/15/american-factories-in-ireland

            https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/a_virtual_round_the_world_voyage

            http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3708098.stm

          • Paul Bustion
            Paul Bustion says:

            T,
            Even though your post is what many would describe as TLDR/To Long, Didnt Read I read all of it. Your just copy/pasting large amounts of irrelevant quotes that dont in any way prove what you are stating. The British government spent at least thousands of pounds, possibly millions of pounds, on helping the Irish famine relief effort during the famine. Why would the British government do that if they secretly wanted to exterminate the Irish? Even Sir Charles Trevelyan, the most anti-Irish member of the British government and the most opposed to large amounts of help in relief for the Irish, supported the government spending money on providing employment and shelter for Irish Catholic peasants during the Famine. Its true that the British government did not help the Irish during the Famine as much as they would have helped people in England suffering a similar famine, but they did not completely neglect the Irish and they certainly did not have any genocidal intent towards the Irish. Im not trying to justify British rule in Ireland, it was wrong of the British to rule the Irish against their will, just like its wrong of the Israelis to rule the Aboriginal Palestinians against their will, because that violates the right to self determination. But its still not true that the British were trying to exterminate the Irish.

          • T
            T says:

            Its especially ridiculous given the extreme altruism of the British government of the time.

            I keep hearing about this much vaunted ‘altruism’ supposedly in existance amongst European peoples in both their actions toward fellow Europeans and towards non-Europeans. It strikes me as being every bit as much out of reality and extreme as those whom worship at the alter of anyone not European being holy and pure in motive (these non-Europeans often in reality having expansive empires themselves) in the form of a person historically referred to as ‘the noble savage’. If this ‘altruism’ actually exist I wish I saw more evidence of it.

            Between Europeans was it altruism in action when US and British bombers in 1945 deliberately firebombed the largely defenseless German art city of Dresden resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands (if not more) non-combatants. Was it altruism when Napoleon under cover of claiming to spread ‘Republican values’ invaded European Russia in 1812 and, in an unholy act to the Russians, took and occupied Moscow? Towards non-Europeans was it altruism when as described by de Tocqueville the US very Capitalistically repeatedly and rather systematically broke succesive supposedly solemn and sacred treaties with what are sometimes referred to as the ‘Indians’ in North America.

            PB said:…in the 1880s they [the British] supported the Belgian King Leopold IIs bid to colonize the Congo because of his stated intent to use the colonization project to help stop slavery and the slave trade in Africa

            If that is supposed to be a case of ‘altruism’ on the British governments part then its a case of altruism gone bad. Leopold II was monstrous in his treatment of the indigenous in Congo.

            He turned his “Congo Free State” into a massive labour camp, made a fortune for himself from the harvest of its wild rubber, and contributed in a large way to the death of perhaps 10 million innocent people.

            He claimed he was doing it to protect the “natives” from Arab slavers, and to open the heart of Africa to Christian missionaries, and Western capitalists.

            Instead, as the makers of BBC Four documentary White King, Red Rubber, Black Death powerfully argue, the king unleashed new horrors on the African continent.

            He turned his “Congo Free State” into a massive labour camp, made a fortune for himself from the harvest of its wild rubber, and contributed in a large way to the death of perhaps 10 million innocent people.

            …”Legalized robbery enforced by violence”, as Leopold’s reign was described at the time, has remained, more or less, the template by which Congo’s rulers have governed ever since.

            PB said: The British had friction with the Afrikaners in South Africa because in the 1830s they forced the Afrikaners to give up their aboriginal African slaves. And the British later had conflict with the Afrikaners there over the British desire to uphold aboriginal African rights against the colonization of the Afrikaners.

            Or, was that all simply a cynical effort of the British to create moral cover to add further valuable territory (ie the Afrikaner’s land) to its already huge empire?

            Was it altruism at work between Europeans later when the British simply took the Afrikaners land in the Boer War circa 1900, placing the Afrikaners women and children in concentration camps of the most terrible condition?

            The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4,177 women, 22,074 children under sixteen and 1,676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando…

            Boer women, children and men unfit for service were herded together in concentration camps by the British forces during Anglo-Boer War 2 (1899-1902). The first two of these camps (refugee camps) were established to house the families of burghers who had surrendered voluntarily, but very soon, with families of combatant burgers driven forcibly into camps established all over the country, the camps ceased to be refugee camps and became concentration camps. The abhorrent conditions in these camps caused the death of 4,177 women, 22,074 children under sixteen and 1,676 men, mainly those too old to be on commando, notwithstanding the efforts of an English lady, Emily Hobhouse, who tried her best to make the British authorities aware of the plight of especially the women and children in the camps.

            British government outlawed the slave trade in all British territories in 1807 and outlawed slavery in most British territories in 1833.

            Many have thought it seemed a bit incongruous that the ever growing British Empire would have a ‘come to Jesus’ moment regarding the quite lucrative Trans-Atlantic slave trade which it then dominated and freely out of their purity and goodness would give it up. To do so seemed very much against the grain of the times. As I’ve attempted to demonstrate, it seems rather that at best and acting on self deception that the slave dealers of the British Empire instead monetized chattel slavery and its trade via the introduction to the world, (simultaneous with slavery’s supposed ‘abolition’) the institution of wage slavery, the much more accurate historic term for ‘cheap labor’. With wage slavery the core ingredients of slavery and its trade remain in place with much being made about peripheral aspects of chattel slavery such as recently having been often race specific, the use of chains, whips, sometimes poorly clothed, etc, as compared to wage slavery, when the essence of slavery is simply the systematic theft of the value of an individual’s labor, which wage slavery reyains. Due to the sheer volume of the predation regarding wage slavery they are actually stealing far vaster amounts of labor this way than the chattel slavers could ever of dreamed of. There’s no free lunch with slavery, whether it be chattel or wage though, as it tends towards genocide on those preyed upon as a source and positively is so for those people on the receiving end. As the numbers preyed upon in wage slavery are so huge and due to this volume the amount of labor stolen larger than what is stolen with chattel slavery it only stands to reason it is that much more virulently genocidal in its effects compared to the already ghastly chattel slavery. In the US in 1860 it had taken well over two centuries for the Anglo-Saxon population there to reach a minority of 45% of the population as compared to the 55% African slave population. With multi-cultarilism’s wage slavery, accompanied with its flimsy fig leaf of the fraudulent asylum seeker or newly artificially created ‘refugee’ hiding the slavery at the ideology’s core, this process of making a minority population out of the indigenous populations of Europe would only take a mere few decades if allowed to continue on to its conclusion.

            Regarding altruism and Europeans, maybe there is a bit more of this on an inter-personal level between Europeans as compared to other groups, and then again, maybe not. As stated, I’m not sure it’s actually there and it seems that some might be trying too hard in what might ultimately be a counter-productive manner to find moral justification for the various European peoples to live on. Having said that, I’m in no way suggesting non-Europeans have more of this altruism than Europeans do.

            Whether it’s there or not though is in a real sense ultimately immaterial. European peoples have a right to exist and to continue to exist, since they do indeed actually exist. The right to survive and to live, to choose life, is its own very powerful moral cause, and no accompanying or support arguments are necessary.

            http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/3516965.stm

            http://www.sahistory.org.za/topic/women-children-white-concentration-camps-during-anglo-boer-war-1900-1902

  10. Karen T
    Karen T says:

    It is a sad state of affairs that Russia, a fellow White nation rich in soul as well as natural resources, has been forced to ally itself with China, a nation with which it has nothing in common culturally or spiritually, only a border.

    • Paul Bustion
      Paul Bustion says:

      Karen T called Russia ‘Russia, a fellow White nation rich in soul as well as natural resources’ Russia is not a friend to Western Europeans. Russia does not share our traditions of liberty. Theres only been a very brief period where Russia had anything resembling western ideals of liberty and justice, when Alexander Kerensky led a Social Democratic regime in Russia after he overthrew Tsar Nicholas II Romanov in 1917. Otherwise Russia has always been a totalitarian state. The Jewish Bolsheviks were able to create a totalitarian dictatorship largely because they had inherited the state from the autocratic Tsarist/Romanov regime. Hitler said Russians were dangerous to western Europeans and would always be so unless there state was contained behind a line. He stated: ‘ The safety of Europe will not be assured until we have driven Asia back behind the Urals. No organized Russian State must be allowed to exist west of that line. They are brutes, and neither Bolshevism nor Tsarism makes any difference — they are brutes in a State of nature. ‘ https://archive.org/stream/HitlerTableTalk/Hitler%20TableTalk_djvu.txt Hitler was correct about that. William Bullitt, a USA diplomat, observed to President Roosevelt II during World War II: ‘Since the time of Peter the Great the Russians have extended their rule ruthlessly over one people after another….No race on earth, not even the Germans, has shown such burgeoning energy as the Russian during the past hundred years. They have conquered one sixth of the earth’s surface. They are still bursting with expansive energy.’ And in reply to Roosevelts argument that Stalin had ended Jewish Bolshevism and become a Russian nationalist: ‘[e]ven if Stalin had become a mere Russian nationalist—which he has not—that would be no guarantee of pacific behavior; indeed, it would be a guarantee of aggressive imperialism.’ http://www.unc.edu/depts/diplomat/archives_roll/2003_01-03/sempa_bullitt/sempa_bullitt_p2.html The Democrats and the Jewish Lobby are wrong to want a new Cold War with Russia, but it would be equally a mistake to take the hare brained approach of naively viewing Russia as a friend of the West.

      • Curmudgeon
        Curmudgeon says:

        Let’s be clear. When it comes to foreign relations, it is foolish believe that another country is a friend. Friendly relations are different than friendship. Friendship breeds expectations. While at a personal level this may be desirable, it is not desirable at a state level, except in dire circumstances.
        Friendship at a state level is a foreign entanglement, of which Americans were advised to avoid in 1796.

      • Pierre de Craon
        Pierre de Craon says:

        Russia does not share our traditions of liberty.

        Paul Bustion: You are learning nothing in school if you can write the above sentence with neither an apology nor some indication that you are pulling your reader’s leg.

        First and foremost, the United States has no “traditions of liberty.” It has instead a long tradition of talk about liberty, which I regret to have to explain to you is not the same thing as actual liberty.

        In various colonies prior to the American Revolution and then during the period of the Articles of Confederation, the ordinary American enjoyed a far more marked absence of governmental restriction than has been the case since the ratification of the Constitution. Indeed, one of the spurs for the convening of the Philadelphia Convention was the widespread conviction among the Good and the Great that their own influence on matters large and small was rather less pronounced than they believed it ought to be. In their correspondence they were by no means shy in making plain that they desired to see brakes placed upon the options available to their social and educational inferiors. As any who either have read the Constitution or live in the polity to which the document “poses no serious threat” (Joseph Sobran) can attest, they got their wish.

        As for Russia, every man with any sense will endorse every word written above by my friend Curmudgeon, not least because Curmudgeon has here made his thinking congruent with the thinking of George Washington at his most insightful and most virtuous. Furthermore, Curmudgeon is simply too polite a man to tell you forthrightly that you have brought discredit upon yourself with your scandalously cavalier use of the word friend. I am less polite, and so I do tell you. In addition, as literally no more than seventeen or eighteen people in this entire nation are so “harebrained” as to “naively [view] Russia as a friend of the West,” you appear to have succeeded in impressing yourself with your own red herring.*

        The truth is that the governments of the western European states and of their New World spinoffs have no friends worth having, in no small part because they are far too (((corrupt))) to merit friendship or exchange it honestly. I hope at least that there are one or two career bureaucrats or appointees in Washington or London or Rome who have the wits and the morals to see that Putin’s Russia, however grave its failings, is the best hope for peace on the planet at this particular time. Indeed, so long as Russia represents even the outside chance for peace, the world’s Jews will do all they can to destroy it from within and without. That you fail to grasp this is pretty astounding.
        ___________________________
        *Hardly a commendable beginning. But then, the number of genuinely worthwhile books you have actually read on this subject may be rather less than one. The cut-and-paste process, alas, allows virtually everyone to aspire to the persona of Internet scholar, but that title bears the same relation to true scholar that military music bears to music (with apologies to Georges Clemenceau).

        • Paul Bustion
          Paul Bustion says:

          Pierre de Craon, in reply to your statement: ‘First and foremost, the United States has no “traditions of liberty.” It has instead a long tradition of talk about liberty, which I regret to have to explain to you is not the same thing as actual liberty.

          In various colonies prior to the American Revolution and then during the period of the Articles of Confederation, the ordinary American enjoyed a far more marked absence of governmental restriction than has been the case since the ratification of the Constitution. Indeed, one of the spurs for the convening of the Philadelphia Convention was the widespread conviction among the Good and the Great that their own influence on matters large and small was rather less pronounced than they believed it ought to be. In their correspondence they were by no means shy in making plain that they desired to see brakes placed upon the options available to their social and educational inferiors. As any who either have read the Constitution or live in the polity to which the document “poses no serious threat” (Joseph Sobran) can attest, they got their wish.’
          You did not understand what I wrote correctly. When I said ‘Russia does not share our traditions of liberty’ I did not specifically mean USA traditions of liberty, I meant Western European traditions of liberty. Western European countries, particularly England but also in general, have had a tradition of individual freedom, freedom of thought and of expression, limits on the power of the government, and so forth, that eastern European countries, particularly Russia, have not had. The Romanov/Tsarist regime in Russia was obviously less bad than the Bolshevik regime, but they were both very authoritarian and disregarding of freedom and individual rights . You are correct that in what became the USA prior to the American Revolution as the states being British colonies there was more freedom than there was in the USA. My point was a criticism of the idea of Russia being treated as a society similar to western European societies, not a Conservative argument that the USA Constitution is the best thing ever, I agree with you that its at least overrated.
          ‘Indeed, so long as Russia represents even the outside chance for peace, the world’s Jews will do all they can to destroy it from within and without.’ I dont understand how Russia, for example, invading Ukraine, or it helping Syria and Iran when theyre at war with Israel, is helpful for world peace. Obviously the Jewish Lobby has an agenda against Russia, and are trying to use their power to start a new Cold War with Russia, and we should reject a new Cold War with Russia and be skeptical of claims the Jewish Lobby makes against Russia, but that doesnt mean we should be naive about Russia either. I also remember hearing on the news that some of the Ukrainian nationalists who oppose Russian attempts to conquer Ukraine are Anti-Jewish, and if thats true that would argue against the idea that its as simple as Jews vs. Russia.
          Ive read at least three biographies of Stalin, Ive read two biographies of Tsar Nicholas II Romanov, Ive read articles about Lenin and Trotsky. Ive also read lots of stuff about Jewry. So I would say while Im not an expert on this stuff Ive read more about it than you think with your comment ‘But then, the number of genuinely worthwhile books you have actually read on this subject may be rather less than one. ‘ I freely admit that Im not particularly intelligent, my IQ is 98, but I still know more about these matters than most people do.

        • Charles Frey
          Charles Frey says:

          Pierre, since Judaeo-Bolshevism is increasingly criminalized as hate-speech, could we not re-code it as your ” red-herring ” ?

          • Paul Bustion
            Paul Bustion says:

            Charles Frey, in reply to your asking Pierre de Craon ‘ since Judaeo-Bolshevism is increasingly criminalized as hate-speech, could we not re-code it as your ” red-herring”?’ I dont understand. Im not a Bolshevik, I dont necessarily consider myself right-wing, but in the context of American politics I definitely am on the right-wing side of the political spectrum. Im not Jewish by any definition, religious or racial. Im Roman Catholic by religion, and racially I have some Jewish ancestry but not enough to qualify as racially Jewish. So I dont understand why youre accusing me of ‘Judeo Bolshevism’.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            Paul, this obviously failed joke of mine was not at all directed at you and probably will not be my last failure as a stand-up comic. Pierre and I have these occasional exchanges playing on words.

            I meant, that instead of referring to the criminalized, ” Nazi ” term Judaeo-Bolshevism, could we not instead, speak of it as “red-herring”; or “gefilte red fish”, for that matter.

            At least until the red herring or gefilte fish, after having been identified as anti-Semitic code by the ADL, SPLC, State and Mesdames May & Merkel get their own catch-up Sections in their various Criminal Codes. Take care.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            And me again. I disagree with Pierre, that you are not learning anything at school. Merely the wrong bullshit. And the Russian serfs were freed in 1861, without brother killing brother and the loss of a half million, because the European [[[ Money Powers ]]] wanted the US split into independent federations, since, as whole, their system was so conducive to growth, that they would soon be uncontrollable by Rothschild & Co.

            So said Bismarck, with the biggest eyes and ears on the continent.

          • Paul Bustion
            Paul Bustion says:

            ‘And the Russian serfs were freed in 1861’ Maybe thats true, Im not an expert on Russia, but Russia was an autocracy where the Tsar had unlimited political power until 1917 when Kerensky overthrew him, and Russia oppressed various non-Russian races, for example, the Jews, Polish, Ukrainians, Georgians and so forth. And with the example of the Jews Im not saying the Jews in Russia were not doing bad things, obviously Jews made up the vast majority of the Bolshevik Party that overthrew Kerensky and murdered the Romanovs and mass murdered Russians by the millions and also Russian Jewish women were overrepresented among the prostitutes in Russia, and Russian Jewish men and women were overrepresented among the business managers of brothels in Russia. But Tsar Nicholas II and other leaders of Russia encouraged pogroms where Jews property and home were attacked and destroyed and that was still wrong despite the misconduct of much of Russian Jewry, and Jews were not the only group oppressed by the Tsars. The Polish, Ukrainians and Georgians and other groups also were ruled against their will. The Tsars did not allow the freedom of speech and of assembly that western societies do. Part of the reason the Bolsheviks were able to create a totalitarian state in Russia so easily is they inherited a government that had been ruled by the highly authoritarian Tsarist/Romanov regime and a people who had been accustomed to follow such an authoritarian government. I know the Jewish Lobby in the USA has an agenda against Russia and always has except for during the time Lenin and Trotsky were in power there, but I still believe its a mistake to see Russia as being a society like Western European Germanic societies, its not as advanced and doesnt have our traditions of liberty.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            ‘And the Russian serfs were freed in 1861.’ Maybe that’s true, I’m not an expert on Russia …

            In fact, there’s no maybe about it.

            So at the outset of his extended comment, Paul Bustion simply dismisses one of the critical facts of Russian and indeed world history as no big deal. Hey man, it’s only Russia! Who cares, eh? Besides, Kerensky was such a cool guy. (On a less facetious note, I still recall the comic-opera-worthy events that followed upon K’s death here in New York City in 1970. The parallels of that year with 1917 were not lost upon many folks with open eyes and working brains.)

            Like a jockey who’s lost his seat at a trial heat, PB then resumes his mount—in this instance a hobbyhorse—but this time he applies the whip to the hobbyhorse’s flanks from the get-go. That our hero is doing the metaphorical equivalent of what tongue-in-cheek Legal Tradition counsels a barrister to do when he finds both the law and the facts weighing heavily against his client—that is, pound the table—may not be as lost upon other readers as he hopes or intends. (Any who doubt the foregoing need only look at PB’s last sentence above, wherein two egregious red herrings are forthrightly reintroduced—this time with creamed onions on the side.)

            Wait! I feel a new beatitude coming on: Happy the man (or even the schoolboy) who can persist in asserting a fantasy analysis even when a critical support for the analysis has taken a powder. For he shall inherit the classroom.
            ____________
            And Charles, apropos your sentences “I disagree with Pierre, that you are not learning anything at school. Merely the wrong bullshit”: You win; I’m persuaded!

          • Paul Bustion
            Paul Bustion says:

            ‘Besides, Kerensky was such a cool guy.’ I never said Kerensky was a great man. He was obviously better than both the Communist regime and the Tsarist/Romanov regime though. Thats not saying much given how poor a job of ruling Russia both the Communists and the Romanovs did. The only time at least to my knowledge before 1991 that Russia had anything approaching a constitutional liberal (in the classical not the leftist sense) democratic government was under Kerensky.

      • T
        T says:

        PB said: Your just copy/pasting large amounts of irrelevant quotes that dont in any way prove what you are stating.

        Those ‘irrelevant quotes’ are from original source materials from the time period in question and are generally preferred in determining what actually happened regarding the past. They deal very specifically with the question of whether or not the potato blight and the management of the resulting Famine was used as a means by powerful elements of the British establishment in an attempt to destroy the Irish people. The 1847 Spectator editorial quoting the Irish newspapers of the day made it plain the Irish saw the practice of British land lords evicting them from the land and then paying their way to go to the US was destroying them as a people…ie ‘extermination’. According to the editorial the Irish felt so strongly about the matter they were shooting land lords engaging in the practice. The London Times editorial from the same approximate time period (1851) entirely concurs with the Irish assessment on this matter, declaring that the Irish leaving Ireland as they were enmasse to go to the US would directly result in the Irish being ‘known no more’ as a people. The editorial doesn’t protest this result but seems rather content with it. It goes further in describing the historic immigrants in the north of Ireland and the resulting ‘mixed’ population there, ie the ‘Plantation’, as being a race of slaves who in the not distant future are to take the place of the Irish in the remainder of Ireland. As mentioned, London Times editorials have long been seen as a mouthpiece for official British government thought regarding policy, the Times not uncommonly during the mid 19th century being referred to as ‘the government organ’.

        I’m not prepared to say it’s a flat out fact the British establishment as a whole (or elements thereof and hangers on) were attempting to ‘exterminate’ the Irish using the blight as a cover, but in what was a decidedly poisonous relationship that was bad for both Irish and English it doesn’t look good for the British regarding the matter. People all too often engage in self deception and along with ulterior motives they may not be entirely conscious of what they are doing at all times regarding their actions.

        PB said:But its still not true that the British were trying to exterminate the Irish.

        Well, PB, we might have to agree to disagree on that final assesment.

        • T
          T says:

          Addendum to the just previous response to PB regarding ‘extermination’ of the Irish: The point of the articles regarding wage slavery, ie the much more accurate historic term for so called ‘cheap labor’, is that the Irish along with Chinese during the mid 19th century were seen as a major potential source by the British and the US establishments as wage slaves for all sorts of industry. The Chinese were quite often being paid one third of whatever the local prevailing rate of labor was in the US, the Irish I would suspect a bit more perhaps, maybe half what everyone else was getting…’cheap labor’ not being given that special monicor for nothing. Anyhow, slavery, a ‘scourge upon mankind’ whether it be chattel or wage , is genocidal by its very nature due to the unnatural ‘mixing’ it entails, and hence why those articles were included in the response.

      • Curmudgeon
        Curmudgeon says:

        “Some White Russians have somewhat asiatic features.”
        Courtesy of the Mongol invasion.

    • T
      T says:

      In the US in 1860 it had taken well over two centuries for the Anglo-Saxon population of South Carolina to reach a minority of 45% of the population as compared to the 55% African slave population.

      The above now corrected portion of a previous entry had ommitted South Carolina.

  11. Karl Nemmersdorf
    Karl Nemmersdorf says:

    I posted an article about horrific black on white crime over at Counter Currents a week ago. I sent it there because it was really snarky and I wasn’t sure if Dr. MacDonald would want a piece like that. I describe many barbaric crimes sorted into tongue-in-cheek classes. I conclude that the we MUST separate. Read it; you’ll like it–https://www.counter-currents.com/2018/05/racial-mayhem-the-simmering-war/

  12. A Mayer
    A Mayer says:

    This is an excellent, timely article. Always indifferent to royalty, I now see them in a different, abhorrent light. Regarding the Wallace case, the perpetrator’s ethnic identity was largely undisclosed. The Piper case revealed as reported that her family considered her black boyfriend as a ‘nice boy’ on meeting him. Call it racist, but preferring to be among one’s own kind, and inculcating in children the advice not to associate with blacks, leads to a defensive wisdom. In Germany recently it was revealed that a young woman accepted an invitation from two blacks to visit their flat for a coffee. She was raped for three hours, after which she went home and committed suicide. The two blacks were released without punishment, leaving the distraught mother shouting after them as she suffered an injustice. If only her parents had been ‘racist’ she would have been told to avoid such ‘people’.

  13. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    1) IMO, the Harry-Markle sideshow is being put on as part of the UK’s contribution to the global collection of side shows to distract Stupid Working Whites from the military arms build up that will make the one (((they))) invested in during Hitler’s Germany look like a mid morning snack.

    2) When have (((they))) ever poured trillions into armaments manufacturing throughout the West and purchases by (((Arab))) controlled nations and never used them?

    3) IMO, (((their))) time continues to grow short;
    A) Increasingly Whites are waking up to their dispossession by Jews.
    B) Peak-oil has been passed so (((their))) black-gold revenues continue to approach the end of rope ever.
    C) Alternative energy sources increasingly continue to lessen the dependency of Whites’ on oil while oppositional forces in non-(((White))) lands grow in strength and threaten (((their))) Global Hegemony.
    D) (((They))) need to act sooner than later if the “…Blasphemous Beast in Jew…” is to succeed in “…its…” quest for World Defilement and Captivity.

    4) USA Debt ceilings are coming up and looming governmental collapses continue to be averted with increasing frequency. Inflation is also accelerating ever so slowly but steadily.
    How much longer will Whites agree to slave for Jewish War ambitions in return of increasingly worthless (((Federal Reserve))) Notes as oppositional nations (i.e. B.R.I.C.)continue to join the coalition that is dropping the (((Fiat))) currencies as a means of payment for goods?

    5) IMO, Harry shares almost no phenotypical resemblance to any British Royals and even if he is genetically a genuine member of the House of Windsor, Harry is now far enough removed from ever succeeding to the throne that he is worth sacrificing to the Jew World Order of White Genocide via (((blood-mixing))) and brain-washing.
    Is it possible that this wedding farce is part of the UK’s strategic sacrifice in the greater global theatre
    to a play for time while Jews prepare the coming White-Indo-Aryan fratricidal genocide with Iran?

    Israel’s stolen technology used to manufacture 200-400 nuclear warheads and their capacity to deliver them is never mentioned.
    Neither is the fact that the Rothschilds do NOT control the Central Bank of Iran or Iranian oil production ever mentioned.

  14. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    The problem, unfortunately, is our own people. They’ve been told now for almost a century not to do this, not to let this happen, not to vote for this, not to accept it, not to normalize it. They didn’t listen. They wanted to bathe in the golden light of popular feelgoodisms and high handed virtue signalling, forever the center of attention.

    Every word that Mosley and Powell spoke has come to pass, and STILL, they avert their eyes, so terrified of admitting naivete and wrongdoing. So afraid of being cast out of popular circles of self congratulating cosmopolitan toffs. The problem deepens, the foreign numbers multiply exponentially, the natives quietly move away, and move some more until there’s nowhere left to run.

    How many times have I warned these people over my own 41 years of life? And each time, met only with the extreme anger of my own people, insults hurled at me as if I was some feral churl about to soil their fine party dresses. I grow weary of warning fools and their ever predictable responses of ignoring the true dangers in order to make a grand, overly dramatic show of publicly denouncing the messenger.

    At this point, England, Sweden, France, Germany, etc., you know best. You go ahead. You know better than millions of other people trying to warn you, and millions of ancestors who would be appalled at the current conditions of your nations. You know so much better than everyone else. You go for it. Have fun with your disappearing demographic and withering culture. Have fun with burgeoning Islam. Nothing can go wrong with that, eh? Yeah, history never shows anything amiss there. Have fun being a minority in the nations your ancestors built with a hostile, foreign, religiously fanatic majority ruling over you. One need only glance at today’s South Africa to see how that all works out, but hey, what do I know, I’m just a horrible racist.

Comments are closed.