The horseshoe crab is a living fossil. So is the Daily Mirror. It was traditionally the newspaper of the respectable White working-class in Britain. They voted Labour and believed in hard work and education, but they were hostile to Third-World immigration. They were socially conservative too, rejecting the prurience and soft-core pornography peddled by the staunch philo-Semite Rupert Murdoch in newspapers like the Sun and News of the World. Of course, the Mirror was owned by the Jewish mega-fraudster Robert Maxwell (né Ján Hyman Binyamin Hoch). And it supplied the amoral thug Alastair Campbell as chief propagandist for the very philo-Semitic and Murdoch-friendly Tony Blair.
Abandoned by Labour
But the Mirror has retained enough of its old values to do something today that the modern Labour party would never do: stand up for the White working-class against predatory brown-skinned Muslims. In early March 2018, its Sunday edition ran a “special investigation” into the vibrant activities of Pakistani men in the small and obscure Midlands town of Telford:
Britain’s ‘worst ever’ child grooming scandal exposed: Hundreds of young girls raped, beaten, sold for sex and some even KILLED
SPECIAL SUNDAY MIRROR INVESTIGATION: Authorities failed to act over 40 years – despite repeated warnings to social workers – with up to 1,000 girls, some as young as 11, abused in Telford
Up to 1,000 children could have suffered in Britain’s worst known abuse scandal – where sex gangs targeted girls as young as 11. The rape hell of vulnerable young girls in one town – Telford – went on for a shocking 40 years, the Sunday Mirror can reveal. As many as 1,000 children could have suffered at the merciless hands of perverts and torturers in Telford since the 1980s. Girls as young as 11 have been lured from their families to be drugged, beaten and raped in an epidemic that, say victims, is still ongoing. THREE people were murdered and two others died in tragedies linked to the scandal.
The Mirror’s 18-month investigation reveals abuse on unprecedented levels. We found:
- Social workers knew of abuse in the 1990s but police took a decade to launch a probe
- Council staff viewed abused and trafficked children as “prostitutes” instead of victims, according to previously unseen files
- Authorities failed to keep details of abusers from Asian communities for fear of “racism”
- Police failed to investigate one recent case five times until an MP intervened
- One victim said cops tried to stop her finding out why her abusers had not been prosecuted because they feared she would talk to us
The scale of the abuse uncovered in Telford – population 170,000 – is feared to be the most brutal and long-running of all. The Rotherham toll was put at 1,500 – but that was in a community of 260,000. Telford’s Tory MP Lucy Allan has demanded a public inquiry and said our findings were “extremely serious and shocking”. She said: “There must now be an independent inquiry into child sexual exploitation in Telford so that our community can have absolute confidence in the authorities.”
Specialist child abuse solicitor Dino Nocivelli, of Bolt Burdon Kemp, said: “These children were treated as sexual commodities by men who inflicted despicable acts of abuse. The survivors deserve an inquiry. They need to know how abuse took place for so long and why so many perpetrators have never been brought to justice.” Our investigators have spoken to 12 victims, most of them unconnected. They accused more than 70 abusers and claimed that violent rapes were still taking place just months ago. …
Telford timeline of abuse
Early 1980s Vulnerable Telford girls are targeted by groups of mainly Asian men.
1996 A concerned resident claims she tells police about the activities of a key abuser selling underage girls for sex.
Late 1990s Files reveal social workers learn of the problem but do little to help.
2000 Lucy Lowe, 16, is killed alongside her mum and sister in an arson attack by abuser Azhar Ali Mehmood, who made her pregnant at 14.
2002 Abuse victim Becky Watson, 13, is killed in a road accident described as a “prank”.
2009 Becky’s friend Vicky Round dies in a drugs-related incident after enduring nine years of sex hell at the hands of a string of paedophiles.
2010– 2012Police probe dubbed Operation Chalice identifies a potential 200 abusers but only nine are jailed. Two further probes collapse. … (Britain’s ‘worst ever’ child grooming scandal exposed: Hundreds of young girls raped, beaten, sold for sex and some even KILLED, The Sunday Mirror, 11th March 2018)
Mubarek Ali: a vibrant rapist given 22 years but out soon
It’s the by-now classic pattern: organized gang-rape and child prostitution are ignored and even facilitated by a Labour council full of feminists. Why so? Because the victims were White and the gang-rapists and pimps were non-White. But the most important part of the story may be these five simple words: “Britain’s worst-known abuse scandal.” We don’t yet know the full extent of Muslim pathologies in the UK. Telford is even smaller than Rotherham, where exactly the same pattern ran true: a Labour council full of feminists ignored gang-rape and child-prostitution for decades on end.
But I suggest that much bigger scandals remain uncovered in cities like London, Manchester, Birmingham, Sheffield and Bradford. If you have a “Muslim community” and a Labour council, you also have a perfect environment for “rape culture” to flourish. That’s genuine rape culture, not the “rape culture” invented by feminists like Sabrina Rubin Erdely, the Jewish goyophobe responsible for a hate-hoax about gang-rape among “the toned, tanned and overwhelmingly blond students” of the University of Virginia.
Britain’s second Industrial Revolution
And we should note that “Muslim communities” and Labour councils go together very happily. Like Blacks, Hispanics and other non-Whites in the United States, Muslims in the United Kingdom vote overwhelmingly for the pro-minority, anti-White party. In the US, it’s the Democrats; in the UK, it’s Labour. Muslims are so enthusiastic about voting Labour that they’ve even industrialized the process:
Labour trio’s “vote-rig factory”
Three Labour councillors in Birmingham were caught operating a “vote-rigging factory”, an Election Court has heard. Police found the trio handling unsealed postal ballots in a deserted warehouse in the city during a late-night raid in June 2004, the hearing was told. The votes were later counted towards that month’s English local elections. The men, elected to the Aston ward, deny collecting votes fraudulently. The judge presiding has indicated the whole postal voting system is under scrutiny. (Labour trio’s “vote-rig factory,” BBC News, 2nd March 2005)
The judge was wrong. The then-ruling Labour party responded to Muslim abuse of “postal ballots” by making it easier for Muslims to obtain them and abuse them. Like the Democrats in the United States, Labour do not care about the Third-Worlding of Britain, because more non-Whites mean more votes for them. This helps explain the shocking feminist response to the gang-rape scandals occurring up and down the UK. The response is shocking because it’s been almost non-existent. With rare and honourable exceptions like the lesbian activist Julie Bindel and the Labour MPs Ann Cryer and Sarah Champion, feminists have remained silent during what you might call Britain’s second Industrial Revolution. When Muslims were running vote-factories in Birmingham, they were also running rape-factories in nearby Telford:
For the last three years [the television documentary series] Dispatches has been following one of the biggest police investigations of its kind, codenamed Operation Chalice. More than 50 officers at West Mercia Police have worked round the clock to gain the trust of vulnerable girls, some as young as 11 when they were first abused. They’ve heard appalling accounts about men who would ejaculate and then urinate in children’s mouths, violating them in every orifice, as well as gang-rape by queues of men while girls were held hostage for hours, sometimes days – all the while being forced to listen to the screams of girls in other rooms with other men. Inhumane doesn’t get close to describing it; it’s the stuff that parental nightmares are made of. (Britain’s Sex Gangs: Tazeen Ahmad feature, Channel 4 Dispatches, 22nd May 2013)
But the same sort of thing was almost certainly happening in Birmingham too. It was definitely happening in Oxford, as I described in “The Blessings of Diversity.” In fact, it’s happened in all Western nations enriched by non-White immigration. But feminists and other liberals have looked the other way. And even when they address the subject, they do their best to conceal highly relevant facts. The Dispatches story I’ve just quoted from is 1500 words long, but does not make any reference to race or religion. There is no mention of “Muslim,” “Asian,” “Pakistani” or “white.” The rapists are generic “men,” the victims generic “girls” and “women.”
At one point the story mentions a “girl” being “passed around 72 men.” How many “men” were eventually convicted and jailed? Seven. In Oxford, the police knew about “scores of men” involved in the gang-rape and sexual torture of under-aged girls. And how many “men” were eventually convicted and jailed? Again, it was seven. And it was the same in Rochdale: the police knew about far more child-rapists than the nine eventually convicted.
Brave New Britain, Brave New Concepts
I think this is a new concept in jurisprudence. You’ve heard about specimen charges, selected when a criminal has committed too many offences for a court to deal with speedily and efficiently. Now meet specimen defendants, selected when a “community” contains too many criminals for the authorities to charge without embarrassment. To White eyes, the sight of gangs on trial for sex-crimes is shocking and anomalous. Whites will organize in gangs to smuggle drugs or fight at soccer matches, but White sex-criminals typically operate alone and without the knowledge of their relatives and friends. They know how the White “community” responds to sex-criminals: with anger and disgust. The White working-class in particular have a horror of what they call “nonces,” meaning particularly those sex-criminals who target children, like the Muslim rape-gangs, and the elderly, like the Black gerontophile rapist Delroy Easton Grant.
Shocking and anomalous: a gang of sex-criminals
But the trials of non-White rape-gangs from Telford, Rotherham, Newcastle and elsewhere were really anomalous not because so many “men” were in the dock, but because so few were. The trials should have involved dozens or even hundreds of defendants: even when the authorities act, they still seek to conceal the true extent of the pathology. Here is more from the Dispatches story about gang-rape in Telford:
Sarah’s story is so horrific it stops me in my tracks. She was taken to many other towns and cities in the UK to be used for sex. A chart she has made shows how the men were connected through social circles or family. I’m staggered when she absent-mindedly describes a particularly chilling incident as consensual; it involved 10 men in one night. I realise that she has been so convincingly groomed and brainwashed that she knew no other pattern for healthy sexual activity. This way of life seemed normal to her and worse still, she felt complicit. I point out that very few women would describe such a dreadful experience as consensual. She thinks about it only for a moment before nodding in agreement. ‘It was intimidation, it was control, and it was rape,’ she tells me sadly. (Britain’s Sex Gangs: Tazeen Ahmad feature, Channel 4 Dispatches, 22nd May 2013)
To repeat: “the men were connected through social circles or family.” In other words, this is part of Muslim “culture” in the UK. Liberals continually celebrate what they like to call “close-knit communities” of “ethnic heritage.” At the same time, they pretend that these “close-knit communities” aren’t aware of what large numbers of their members are up to. Ansar Ali, a “spokesman for Together Against Grooming” – “grooming” being a euphemism for industrial-scale rape – was interviewed by the BBC about the Mirror’s revelations. He said this about Muslim rape-gangs: “The vast majority of people find their actions reprehensible, including the communities from which they originate.”
Ali was lying. He knows the attitudes prevalent among Muslim men towards women in general and White women in particular. But he also knows that he’s safe to lie. The BBC is packed with feminists from top to bottom. None of them would challenge a non-White male about the “rape culture” that Britain has imported from Third-World nations like Pakistan, Jamaica and Somalia. Instead, feminists and other so-called “progressives” have enthusiastically supported Third-World immigration and demonized all opposition to it as racist and xenophobic.
Black gang-rapists who threw caustic soda on their victim
They’ve also collaborated in the liberal cover-up of non-White rape culture. The cover-up began to slip after the Rotherham scandal, but is now back in place. As Douglas Murray pointed out at the Spectator, the BBC did its best to ignore and then minimize the Mirror’s new revelations about Telford. The Guardian did the same: it had a brief story under the headline “Up to 1,000 children may have been victims in worst UK abuse ring.” There was absolutely no mention of race or religion in the story: generic “children” were the victims of generic “men.”
The Feminist Army fails to fight
And how have the Guardian’s army of feminists responded to the Mirror’s revelations about Telford? With silence. After a multi-national Muslim rape-gang were jailed in Newcastle, the non-White journalist Sonia Sodha, “chief leader writer at the Observer [the Guardian’s Sunday edition],” wrung her hands as follows: “If there’s one question we owe it to the victims of the Newcastle child abuse gang to ask, it’s how on earth this type of organised child sexual abuse is still happening.” Apparently she and other Guardianista feminists don’t feel they owe anything to the victims of the Telford child abuse gangs, because they haven’t written about the Mirror’s revelations. As I pointed out in “Silent Sisterhood Revisited,” Sodha also squirted squid-ink about the causes of the abuse in Newcastle. She claimed that “by endlessly raking over this second-order question — is race or religion a factor? — we never seem to make any progress on the first-order issue: how do we prevent this from happening again?”
Race and religion are not “second-order questions”: they are central to why the abuse happens. Sodha did not mention a highly relevant comment attributed to Badrul Hussain, one of the men convicted at Newcastle: “All white women are only good for one thing. For men like me to fuck and use like trash. That’s all women like you are worth.” A woman alleged in court that Hussain said that, so Sodha and other feminists should automatically believe her. Why did Sodha not make the comment central to her analysis of what happened in Newcastle? Because that would have involved doing something that feminists prefer to avoid at all times: accepting reality and admitting the truth.
Rape is inspired by anti-White racism
The reality of sex-crime in Britain is that non-White Muslims and Blacks are not only far more likely to commit it than White men, they are also committing it in its worst forms, like the gang-rape by Blacks in which caustic soda was thrown on the victim. It’s even possible that non-Whites commit the majority of sex-crimes in Britain, despite still being a minority of the population. Worse still, from the Guardianista point of view, their sex-crimes can be shown to be inspired by “racist stereotypes” and “racial supremacism.” Badrul Hussein’s deeply toxic comment about “white women” is only one example. Here are three more:
Man who raped teenage girl held sharp piece of wood to her throat and said: ‘You cannot be a virgin because you are white’
A rapist held a sharp piece of wood to a teenage girl’s throat and told her “my country would love you” in a horrifying attack. Ahmed Abdoule, 33, of west Hull, told the girl it was impossible she could be a virgin “because she was white”. He also pulled her top over her head so he did not have to look at her while he raped her. Hull Crown Court heard the girl “pleaded” with Abdoule to let her go during the horrifying ordeal. Ahmed Abdoule was jailed for 11 years. The court heard Abdoule, a Somalian national, was known to the woman and took her to his home. …
Judge Mark Bury told Abdoule: “She told you she was a virgin to try and get you to stop. “You said to her, ‘You cannot be, you are white.’ “You told her not to look at you, and pulled her top over her face, telling her you did not want to see her while you were raping her.” After he had raped her, Abdoule told his victim he had “liked it,” and that she was “not the only girl who was going to get punished”. He also said to her: “My country would love you.” … (Man who raped teenage girl held sharp piece of wood to her throat and said: ‘You cannot be a virgin because you are white’, The Hull Daily Mail, 8th February 2018)
Asian father-of-four raped pub worker for three hours after dragging her off the street saying ‘you white women are good at it’
… The woman, who is in her 20s, was walking home from work in Bedford at around 11pm when she was grabbed by Abdul Ghafoor, 33, and forced her into undergrowth, a court heard. Ghafoor had drunk five rum drinks when he came up behind her and bundled her into the bushes where he began sexually assaulting her in an attack that lasted from 11.25pm until 2.45am. …
Prosecutor at Luton Crown Court, Sally Hobson, said Ghafoor’s attack had a racial aspect as he had made comments about the sort of behaviour white women would engage in. ‘He made racially aggravated comments to the effect that this is the sort of behaviour that white women would engage in. If he saw her again she would give him a blow job,’ she said. ‘She was a white woman and he believed it was okay to behave in this way. It was a stranger rape of a young woman going about her business in her home town she she ought to feel safe.’
Judge Richard Foster said the victim had been subjected to a ‘nightmare of unimaginable proportions’. He told Ghafoor he had been on the lookout for a victim that night and subjected the woman to the most appalling sexual abuse for over three hours. ‘You forced her to perform oral sex and you said: “you white girls are good at it.” To some extent the offence was racially aggravated.’ … (Asian father-of-four raped pub worker for three hours after dragging her off the street saying ‘you white women are good at it’, The Daily Mail, 21st December 2014)
Jamaican Gang That Used Rape As Its Initiation
Immigration chiefs faced fury last night for allowing a member of a sordid Jamaican rape gang to make South London his hunting ground. Sheldon Stewart, 26, was said to be part of the Buckles mob – a violent criminal outfit responsible for a spree of vile attacks in the Caribbean. Their hallmark is said to be a sickening initiation ceremony where new recruits are instructed to abduct and rape. Inner London Crown Court heard how Stewart attacked a 15-year-old girl at gunpoint and dragged another woman into his flat in Peak Hill, Sydenham, after calling her a “white bitch”. He and the scar-faced friend threatened to “burst” or shoot the first victim on November 25, 2004, if she didn’t submit to their sordid demands. The girl had been lured into Stewart’s car on the promise of cannabis and a lift. Instead, both men took turns to rape her as a gun was held to her head.
Stewart targeted a second victim on December 30, 2004, first trying to chat her up, then bundling her into a car on the Tulse Hill Estate. He called the 25-year-old a “white bitch” and drove her back to the Sydenham flat, where the accomplice was again waiting to pounce. Stewart held a 7” knife to the sobbing woman’s throat, but she kept calm and fooled the pair into letting her go to the toilet from where she fled. Judge Lindsay Burn described Stewart’s indifference towards his crimes as “extraordinary.” Sentencing the killer to eleven years for the sex attacks and a further year for witness intimidation, the judge added: “It’s evident to me that you thought you could behave towards women in this way and get away with it. There was no remorse whatsoever expressed by you for what you have done.” (icSouthLondon, 18th April 2006)
Those are three stories that I chanced across without specifically looking for examples of this kind of crime. I’m sure many other stories of anti-White sexual violence could be produced not just from Britain but from all ethnically enriched Western nations. For example, in Australia one member of a Lebanese-Muslim rape-gang told his White victim: “You deserve it because you’re an Australian.” He also said: “I’m going to fuck you Leb-style.” In France, four Muslims said they committed a vicious, two-hour rape on a White woman because she was French and because «les Français sont tous des fils de pute» – “the French are all sons of whores.”
This kind of material should be extremely interesting to feminists at the Guardian, BBC and all other progressive organizations. Women are being horrifically abused by men who combine what are, to all correctly thinking feminists, the two most toxic ideologies on earth: patriarchy and racism. But feminists aren’t interested in such stories. Instead, they react like vampires confronted with a garlic-soaked crucifix. They don’t analyse anti-White rapes, they don’t condemn the anti-White rapists, and they do their best to pretend that such things aren’t happening. It’s the wrong kind of patriarchy and the wrong kind of racism, you see: it’s Muslim patriarchy and anti-White racism. Analysing these things and fighting them would help women, but helping women clearly isn’t important to feminists.
Feminists support rape
If it were, feminists would oppose mass immigration from the Third World. Instead, they enthusiastically support such immigration, because Muslims, Blacks and other non-Whites supply guaranteed votes to parties like Labour and the Democrats. These parties fund and employ feminists and collaborate with them on campaigns like #MeToo. That campaign was launched after revelations about the Jewish producer Harvey Weinstein, a Hillary-supporting pro-feminist whose behaviour towards women has been repulsive and who has probably committed a number of genuine rapes. But his crimes have been nothing like as bad as those committed against thousands of women and girls in places like Telford and Rotherham. As far as is known, none of the disproportionately Jewish men involved in the “Pervnado” have turned their victims into heroin addicts, set them to work as prostitutes or murdered them by incineration.
All of that has happened to White working-class girls at the hands of Muslims in the United Kingdom. The sixteen-year-old Lucy Lowe, whom I wrote about “A Tale of Two Nations,” died with her mother and sister in an arson attack committed by Azhar Ali Mehmood, a 26-year-old Muslim who had been raping her since she was thirteen and made her pregnant at fourteen. The murders were a classic example of “murderous male entitlement” and “toxic patriarchal attitudes.” Feminists yawned and looked the other way. They also ignored the murder of Laura Wilson, who was coerced into sex at twelve, then stabbed to death at seventeen by her Muslim rapists, who described her as a “kaffir [= non-Muslim] bitch.” Another classic example of murderous male entitlement and toxic patriarchal attitudes. I’m sure there have been many more victims like that. Some have been murdered, others have committed suicide or died after being turned into alcoholics and drug-abusers by their Muslim pimps. Even more White working-class girls have had their lives wrecked by “men” who see them as fit for nothing but exploitation and abuse.
No rewards for defending White women
Feminists don’t care. There is no reward for feminists in campaigning on behalf of girls like Lucy Lowe and Laura Wilson. Feminists heartily condemn Weinstein because they can call him a “white male” and because their #MeToo campaign will put more wealth and power in feminist hands. There are no such rewards for campaigning against the abuse of White working-class girls in Telford. That’s why feminists are silent – and worse than silent. By supporting mass immigration and “anti-racism,” they have been complicit in a vast number of sex-crimes that would not have taken place without non-White immigration.
British officialdom has been worse than complicit. In Rotherham, the police arrested White fathers who attempted to rescue their daughters from Muslim rapists. During the Telford horrors, the police used the term “consensual” to describe sexual relationships between adult Muslim men and White girls who were sometimes as young as eleven. That’s how the police justified their inaction. Under a feminist analysis, this is absolutely shocking: there was a vast imbalance of power between the men and the girls, just as there was between Harvey Weinstein and the aspiring actresses on whom he preyed. Feminists have already written millions of words about Weinstein and the #MeToo campaign. But there has been no feminist analysis of “power imbalances,” “misogynist abuse” and “police inaction” in Telford, Rotherham, Oxford, Rochdale and many other British towns and cities.
Cressida and the Community
Now compare the police response when the victims of crime belong not to the White working-class but to a sacred minority. As I described in a recent article for the Occidental Observer, the Jewish Community Security Trust (CST) assiduously collects examples of “anti-Semitism” and publishes an annual report setting them before the appalled gaze of parliamentarians and the media. The CST regards graffiti at a bus-stop and bacon being thrown over a synagogue-wall as worthy of inclusion in its report. On the basis of such trivia, the home secretary and shabbos shiksa Amber Rudd used the CST’s Annual Dinner “to pledge £13.4 million towards security measure for British Jews in the coming year .” The Jewish Chronicle noted that the CST Dinner also hosted “Cressida Dick, the Metropolitan Police commissioner,” “the chief constables of police forces from across the country,” and “[l]eading politicians from every major party.”
As I described above, it has been shown in court that anti-White racism is motivating the rape and murder of White women. But there is no officially backed White equivalent of the Community Security Trust collecting data on anti-White racism and producing an annual report. If a White advocacy group approached the home secretary or the Metropolitan Police commissioner and asked for funds to protect Whites against non-White violence, the group might well find itself charged with “incitement to racial hatred.” Meanwhile, the CST and its Muslim ally, Tell MAMA (the acronym stands for “Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks”), get full official backing to protect minorities against much less serious threats. Douglas Murray says that the BBC has minimized the Telford horrors because a drama it broadcast about Muslim abusers in Rochdale partly inspired a mentally ill White male to run down and kill a Muslim in London. After that murder, British liberals decided that it’s better to retreat into silence about Muslim pathologies and let the rapes and murders of White girls continue.
But imagine if Whites had been raping, pimping and murdering non-Whites on the scale seen among non-White Muslims in Telford, Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, Newcastle, and elsewhere. British liberals would be churning out dramas, documentaries and official reports in response. If one of those dramas inspired an enraged Muslim to murder an innocent White, the liberals would shrug and say: “What can you expect?” But Whites aren’t behaving like that to non-Whites. As in the United States, murders, rapes and other crimes are overwhelmingly committed by non-Whites against Whites, despite non-Whites being in the minority.
The Joyim of Boyim
However, there is a recent example of liberals in America minimizing the abuse of under-aged non-Whites by predatory White males, having ignored the abuse for decades. How could this be? James Fulford explains part of it at VDare:
After my recent blog In Met Conductor James Levine Sex Charges, MSM Doesn’t Want To Say Victims Are Teen Boys I got couple of private communications from people familiar with the opera world that suggested that Metropolitan Opera conductor James Levine was (a) involved with Leonard Bernstein in his pursuit of teen boys and (b) specialized in going after black teens. …
Now, the fact that a black was victimized by a white is not something you generally have dig out of an MSM story with internet research – they usually put that in the headline. But in James Levine stories, you have to read to paragraph 9 to find that boys were the victims at all, and that’s because the MSM doesn’t want to stereotype gays as disproportionately attracted to underage boys – which they are, of course. (The youngest of the alleged victims named in the recent NYT story was 16.) … It’s too bad James Levine isn’t a Republican – then we’d be hearing all about his alleged predations on black teenagers. As it is, it’s one of those things the MSM doesn’t want to know. (Did James Levine’s Sexual Predations Target BLACK Teen Boys?, VDare, 13th March 2018)
But Fulford didn’t mention another factor in the media cover-up: the chicken-hawks Levine and Bernstein are Jewish, just like the Labour parliamentary Greville Janner, who was the subject of even worse allegations about paederasty in the United Kingdom.
Britain’s hostile elite
The Crown Prosecution Service has officially admitted that Janner should have gone on trial long before his death in 2015, because the evidence against him was more than sufficient. Thanks to Jewish privilege, he escaped: at various times, Janner was president of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, chair of the Holocaust Educational Trust, and vice-president of the World Jewish Congress. To get to the top in British politics, it’s vital to cultivate Jewish potentates like Janner. One goy who knows this very well is the millionaire ex-banker Sajid Javid, a Tory minister who wants to become Britain’s first Muslim and first non-White prime minister. He is a very active member of Conservative Friends of Israel and is constantly making sycophantic speeches before Jewish audiences.
Sajid Javid at the CST
But he sometimes addresses British goyim too. At the same time as the Telford revelations, he announced that “Britain can rightly claim to be one of the most successful diverse societies in the world.” I’m reminded of that great American one-liner: “Other than that, Mrs Lincoln, how was the play?” Other than suicide-bombing, rape-gangs, political corruption, violent crime, censorship, fraud, welfare dependency, expensive diseases, inbreeding and a surveillance state, diversity has showered Britain with blessings. Funnily enough, nations like Hungary and Japan don’t want diversity and its blessings.
Nor does Sajid Javid’s favoured nation of Israel, which intends to deport Muslim enrichers rather than welcome them in and let them organize suicide-bombings, rape-gangs and child-prostitution rings. Unlike Britain, Israel isn’t run by a hostile elite that wants to swamp and destroy its majority population with outsiders. The Telford horrors are one small example of what the hostile elite has wrought in Britain.