A Tartan Tyranny: Censorship and Silence in the Virtue-Signalling Scottish Police State

Race isn’t a social construct, but here’s something that is: the so-called United Kingdom. In fact, it’s precisely because race exists that the U.K. is a construct rather than a nation. The native Whites of England, Ireland, Scotland and Wales are genetically distinct, which is why those regions are all genuine nations (ultimately from Latin nasci, “to be born”). If I travel from England to Scotland or Wales, I feel as though I’m going to a different country.

Concept vs Reality

That’s because I am going to a different country. And I like the feeling. I fully support the concept of Scottish and Welsh independence. For example, I would be delighted to see an independent Wales where the Welsh language and Welshness were re-born and re-invigorated. An independent Scotland would be more complicated and perhaps there should be two of them, split between the Gaelic-speaking Highlands and the Scots-speaking Lowlands.

But I chose my words carefully: I fully support the concept of Scottish and Welsh independence, but I utterly oppose what would be the modern reality. If Scotland and Wales won independence in the near future, they would be run by traitorous left-wing governments and would open their borders to the Third World. That’s already happened in independent southern Ireland, where the Jewish immigration minister Alan Shatter welcomed in many thousands of Blacks and Muslims. Their low average IQs and high average criminality are now inflicting serious harm on Ireland, as the hate-blogger Irish Savant has often documented.

A Scottish shabbos goy

Alan Shatter will one day, I hope, be put on trial for crimes against the Irish people. But Shatter couldn’t be charged with treason, because he was never Irish in the first place. He was always loyal to his own Jewish race and its interests. However, someone who can be charged with treason is the Scottish shabbos goy Tony Blair, who came to power with Jewish money and diligently served Jewish interests throughout his time as prime minister. Blair’s thuggish and Machiavellian press-secretary Alastair Campbell told the Jewish Chronicle that Blair “was conscious of the need to have very, very good relations” with “the Jewish community.” That “community” is small in numbers but gigantic in power, influence and wealth. In fact, you could define Blair’s New Labour party as an alliance between hostile Jews and renegade Scots against England and English traditions.

One English tradition that Jews like Peter Mandelson and Scots like Tony Blair wanted to destroy was the tradition of free speech. Authoritarianism and collectivism are stronger north of the border, where Christianity took a much sterner and stricter form after the fall of Catholicism. Although the Church of England burnt and beheaded enthusiastically in its early days, it became a mild and tolerant institution known for its fence-sitting and equivocation, not for hell-fire sermons and heresy-hunting. Calvinistic Scottish Protestantism was quite different and it’s unsurprising that Scotland witnessed “the last mass execution for witchcraft in western Europe.”

A curse on the Campbells

Scottish politicians like Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and John Reid brought those authoritarian traditions south to London to meet the authoritarian traditions of Jews like Lord Levy, Peter Mandelson and David Miliband. But the dim and narcissistic Blair was a front-man in New Labour, not a genuine leader. He followed orders from much more intelligent and forceful men like Lord Levy, who funded him, and Alastair Campbell, who oversaw his propaganda and choreographed his acting. Campbell was born in England but is ethnically Scottish and remained true to the clan whose name he bears. Historically, the Campbells are notorious in Scotland for their treachery in the Massacre of Glencoe against the Clan MacDonald. Alastair Campbell became notorious in England for his Machiavellian ways and was central to the lies and deceit that took Britain into the Iraq War.

The Machiavellian Alastair Campbell

Nowadays Campbell is central to the campaign to nullify or reverse Brexit, which Scotland didn’t vote for and which the Scottish “First Minister” Nicola Sturgeon strongly opposes. Sturgeon leads the collectivist and authoritarian Scottish National Party (SNP), but the “independence” planned by the Scots Nats would be a thoroughly Orwellian affair. They want to take Scotland out of the United Kingdom so that it can come more firmly under the rule of the European Union (EU).

“The monstrous regiment of women”

Nicola Sturgeon is not interesting for her intellect, but she is interesting for her biology. The Scottish Calvinist John Knox (1513–72), who condemned the “monstrous regiment [i.e., unnatural rule] of women” under Queen Mary, would have been horrified to see women leading all of Scotland’s major political parties a few years ago. While Sturgeon led the SNP, the Scottish Conservatives were led first by Annabel Goldie, then by the lesbian Ruth Davidson, and Scottish Labour was led first by Wendy Alexander, then later by Johann Lamont.

Scottish fem-pols (clockwise from top left): Nicola Sturgeon, Ruth Davidson, Wendy Alexander, Johann Lamont, Annabel Goldie

These women did not get to the top because of their high intelligence or their libertarianism. On the contrary, they were typical authoritarian female politicians: bullet-headed, short-haired and high-testosterone. Like the high-testosterone Tory fem-pol Priti Patel in England, Ruth Davidson wants to be prime minister of the United Kingdom; like Patel again, Davidson knows whose support she needs to fulfill that ambition. She began cultivating powerful Jews long ago. When the Jewish Chronicle ran an article with the headline “Ruth Davidson: the next Prime Minister?,” she must have known that she was hitting the J-spot. Here are extracts from the article:

Scotland’s political leaders are “united” in their efforts to combat antisemitism in the country, according to Ruth Davidson. The leader of the Scottish Conservatives said the collective approach represented “a different picture north of the border” and highlighted rival Nicola Sturgeon’s work to condemn “disgusting” Jew-hate as proof all parties were taking the problem seriously.

Ms Davidson said, by contrast, the Labour Party’s problems nationally had been “laid at Jeremy Corbyn’s door” in a way that issues with individual politicians in Scotland had not reflected badly on party leaders. In her first major interview on Jewish issues, Ms Davidson explained how her own faith background has affected her relationship with the community and outlined ways she believes Israel can act as a guiding light for Scotland following devolution.

Her words of praise for fellow Scottish politicians who have condemned antisemitism come after a series of incidents involving Scottish National Party representatives. … But Ms Davidson said: “To be fair to my colleagues from other parties, particularly the Labour Party, they have always had strong links to the community, as have we. There have been some issues with some individual members, but I wouldn’t, for example, say that necessarily transfers to the leadership of the party as you might suggest some issues within the UK Labour Party have been laid at Jeremy Corbyn’s door. Nicola Sturgeon, for example, has regularly met the Jewish community and has always spoken supportively of it …”

The tumultuous events in British politics during the past few years have left Ms Davidson looking like the rarest of politicians — successful and popular. The JC understands her invitation to speak at the Board [of Jewish Deputies] dinner was prompted not only by the Scottish Tories’ impressive election results at Holyrood last year and at Westminster in June, but partly by how poorly others had performed, leaving a trail of discredited political leaders. … Despite being regularly spoken of as a future leader of the Conservatives nationally, Ms Davidson will not be the one to stick the knife into Theresa May — at the moment anyway.

She is glad Mrs May intends to stay in Number 10 until 2021. “The Prime Minister is absolutely the right person to lead us through the Brexit process and beyond,” she said. “She’s been a strong friend and supporter of the Jewish community. …” (Ruth Davidson: the next Prime Minister?, The Jewish Chronicle, 8th September 2017 / 17th Elul 5777)

Ruth Davidson cultivates the Community (with the Jewish James Harding of the BBC)

To understand what Davidson is up to, simply ask: Why has Theresa May “been a strong friend and supporter of the Jewish community”? It’s simple. Like David Cameron, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown before her, that’s how she got the funding and friendly media coverage that made her prime minister. The same arrangement exists in Scotland, where Nicola Sturgeon “has regularly met the Jewish community and has always spoken supportively of it.”

Ruth Davidson is following the same path to power. When she was “paying tribute” to the Balfour Declaration of 1917 that helped to create the state of Israel, she said that “Scotland has got a very small Jewish community — less than 6,000 — and it’s very concentrated, but it’s had some great champions from all the parties down the years.” In other words, although Jews are an even smaller minority in Scotland than they are in England, they wield the same power there and Scottish politicians scramble for their support in the same way.

Flooding Scotland with non-Whites

Ruth Davidson has ambitions far beyond Scotland, but Nicola Sturgeon wants to become leader of an “independent” Scotland, so that she can bind it more firmly into the EU. She likes the authoritarianism of the EU just as much as she likes the idea of opening Scotland’s borders to the Third World. She has claimed that Scotland “needs more working age people to help our economic growth, generate the tax revenues and support the public services so many of us rely on.”

Kriss Donald, a victim of hate whom the left ignore

As Migration Watch pointed out in response, she’s arguing for a Ponzi scheme even if only high-IQ White European immigration into Scotland is taken into account. But Sturgeon doesn’t really care about public services and the economy: she wants to flood Scotland with tax-eating, welfare-dependent non-Whites from the Third World. After all, it’s not members of the Scottish elite like her who suffer the consequences of Third-World enrichment. It’s ordinary Scots like the fifteen-year-old schoolboy Kriss Donald, who was abducted at random off the streets of Glasgow by Pakistani-Muslim thugs simply for being White. After being driven hundreds of miles pleading for his life, he was stabbed repeatedly, doused in petrol, and burnt to death.

Some murders don’t matter

That racist murder, like the rape, torture and murder of the English schoolgirl Mary-Ann Leneghan in 2005, was far worse than the racist murder of the Black teenager Stephen Lawrence in 1993. But only Stephen Lawrence is the subject of an official martyr-cult that now has its own annual memorial day. Stephen Lawrence Day has been deliberately placed in the calendar as an attack on White Englishness, because it falls on 22nd April, directly before the day of England’s patron saint St George on 23rd April. And St George’s Day is also the traditional birthday of William Shakespeare. This attack on Englishness was carried out by the shabbos shiksa Theresa May, leader of the so-called “Conservatives,” but Stephen Lawrence Day is firmly in the tradition of cultural Marxism established by Tony Blair and New Labour.

“Dear Haters” — cultural Marxists attack Scottish Whites

Cultural Marxism also insists that the virtuous elite must continually browbeat and admonish the vice-filled ordinary Whites whom the elite rule and seek to swamp with “diversity.” That’s why the so-called Conservatives created Stephen Lawrence Day. It’s also why the SNP has issued a series of vomit-inducing progressive adverts attacking ordinary Scots for their racism, homophobia, transphobia, religious bigotry, and “disablism.” SJWs from England at the National Student approvingly reported that:

Scotland has launched an extraordinary letter campaign directly confronting haters by calling them out on their views and telling them ‘we’ve had enough’. The new ad campaign by One Scotland, the Scottish Government’s equality campaign, features a series of letters written to a variety of different ‘haters’. Billboards featuring the letters began popping up across the country last month [September 2018]. The messages are powerful and make it clear hateful views won’t be tolerated, with each one signed “Yours, Scotland”.

There are letters directed to bigots, racists, disablists, transphobes, homophobes and racists. All with equally provocative and hard hitting messages. The One Scotland campaign explained: “Police Scotland takes hate crime very seriously. In the last year there were over 5,300 charges of hate crime reported to the Procurator Fiscal in Scotland. However, there are many more incidents that go unreported.” This amazing campaign has been well received and highly praised.

(Scotland’s launched an incredible ‘Dear Haters’ letter campaign, The National Student, 2nd October 2018)

The SNP fully accept the Jewish idea that ordinary Whites are all potential Nazis seething with hate, intolerance and violence. SJWs are excited about the “Dear Haters” campaign because it gives them a chance to revel in their own virtue and celebrate their moral superiority over the haters who lurk in every corner of Scotland.

“Dear Ordinary Scottish Whites…”

In other words, the campaign is an updated form of Calvinism, with the same authoritarianism and desire to censor, suppress and control. The sins have changed but the psychology stays the same. The adverts are being run by “One Scotland, the Scottish Government’s equality campaign,” but “equality” is not the true aim of the “Scottish Government.” The name “One Scotland” reminds me of these famous lines from Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings: “One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them, / One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them / In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.” Here is the text of the five virtue-signalling letters issued by “One Scotland”:

Dear Racists,
Do you threaten people because of where they’re from or the colour of their skin? Do you hurl language so vile that it makes people scared to leave their homes? Well, your hate has no home here. We’re making a stand and if we see or hear anything, we’re calling you out and calling the police.
Yours,
Scotland.

Dear Homophobes,
We have a phobia of your behaviour. If you torment people because of who they love, shout words that we are not going to write, or use violence because you don’t like who someone is holding hands with, you should be worried. If we see or hear your abuse, we’re calling the police. That’s because love lives in this country, not hate.
Yours,
Scotland.

Dear Transphobes,
Do you think it’s right to harass people in the street? Right to push transgender people around in clubs? Right to humiliate, intimidate and threaten them online?
Well we don’t.
That’s why if we see you doing harm, we’re reporting you. We believe people should be allowed to be themselves. Except if they’re spreading hate.
Yours,
Scotland.

Dear Disablists,
Did you read about the girl with Down’s syndrome who was pushed to the ground? Or the man with a learning disability who was tormented so much that he was drive to suicide? We did and it makes us sick. From now on, if we see or hear your hate, we’re reporting you. We’re a caring nation, not a hating one. And we’re going to take away your ability to hurt people.
Yours,
Scotland.

Dear Bigots,
Division seems to be what you believe in. We don’t want your religious hate on our buses, on our streets and in our communities. We don’t want you spreading your intolerance. Or making people’s lives a misery because of their religious dress. You may not have faith in respect and love, but we do. That’s why if we see or hear your hate, we’re reporting you. End of sermon.
Yours,
Scotland.

The self-righteous and authoritarian tone of the letters fits perfectly with this boast on One Scotland’s website: “The Scottish Government Equality Unit has been working in partnership with key religious and belief bodies including Interfaith Scotland, the Edinburgh Interfaith Association, Interfaith Glasgow, Just Festival, Faith in Community Scotland, Scottish Council of Jewish Communities (SCoJeC), and Holocaust Memorial Day Trust to promote and support the development of inter faith relations in Scotland.”

“Anti-hate” means “anti-White”

As noted above, the Scottish schoolboy Kriss Donald was murdered in an exceptionally brutal and painful way because of “hate.” Has he featured in One Scotland’s self-righteous campaigns in any way? Of course not, because he was White and his killers were brown-skinned Pakistani Muslims. One Scotland and the Scottish National Party are not interested in promoting “equality” or in fighting “hate.” Instead, they are interested in extending and strengthening their own power to censor and control. They’re not anti-hate: they’re anti-White. Their silence about Kriss Donald is clear evidence of that. So is their silence about Asad Shah, a peaceful, tolerance-promoting Muslim shopkeeper who was stabbed to death in Glasgow in March 2016 by a “hater” who had travelled hundreds of miles from England with no other purpose in mind.

Asad Shah, another victim of hate whom the left ignore

You could call this murder Scotland’s “Stephen Lawrence” moment, except that the death of Asad Shah was worse than the death of Stephen Lawrence by all objective criteria. Stephen Lawrence was stabbed twice in a chance encounter and might easily have survived. Asad Shah was stabbed repeatedly in a premeditated murder by a hate-filled fanatic who wanted to silence Shah’s ideas and intimidate Muslims like Shah. So why did leftists in Scotland not create a martyr-cult for Asad Shah to match the martyr-cult leftists in England have created for Stephen Lawrence? Why did they not hail him as a true Scot who had been brutally slain by a vicious hate-criminal from savage and backward England?

The wrong kind of hate-criminal

The answer is simple. Scotland’s leftist elite threw Asad Shah down the memory hole as soon as possible because he was murdered by the wrong kind of hate-criminal. Shah was a gentle, tolerant, brown-skinned Muslim, loved and respected by all who knew him. So far, so good. If his murderer had been a White, or even better a White Christian, the martyr-cult would have been created immediately. But Asad Shah’s violent, intolerant murderer wasn’t a White. Instead, he was another brown-skinned Muslim called Tanveer Ahmed. Shah belonged to a Muslim sect called the Ahmadis, you see, and Tanveer Ahmed is a Sunni Muslim who, like countless other Sunnis in Britain, regards Ahmadis as heretics and blasphemers.

Those facts don’t fit the leftist narrative whereby Muslims are the saintly victims of White racism and Islamophobia. Authoritarian leftists like Nicola Sturgeon don’t want to mention Asad Shah because his murder proves that the worst “hate” and intolerance are found not among Whites, but among non-Whites.

The supremacism remains the same

Nicola Sturgeon is an undisguised authoritarian who wants to create a Tartan Tyranny north of the border under the guidance of the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities and the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust. If the Scottish lesbian Ruth Davidson becomes British prime minister, she will also be guided by the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust. But the Scottish Council of Jewish Communities will be replaced by the Board of Jewish Deputies.

In other words, the name will change but the Jewish supremacism will stay the same. There would be authoritarian traditions in Britain even if Jews no longer lived here, but those traditions would be weaker and less able to do harm. As it is, Jews do live in Britain and so authoritarianism is flourishing here in everything from laws against thought-crime to the surveillance state. Jews and their allies have to lie, censor and imprison because their ideology opposes reality and denies human biology. As science exposes more and more of the truth, their power will weaken and their lies will become more and more obvious. Here is some wisdom from Robert Burns, Scotland’s greatest poet: “Freedom an’ whisky gang thegither!” After all, whisky is from the Gaelic uisge beatha, “water of life.” You can’t get more Scottish than that.

34 replies
  1. William Gruff
    William Gruff says:

    ‘ … you could define Blair’s New Labour party as an alliance between hostile Jews and renegade Scots against England and English traditions.

    You could indeed and the only way to prevent attacks on us by such groups in future is to establish an English Parliament, with powers at least equal to that of Scotland, and work to reinvigorate the nearly moribund sense of English ethnic consciousness and interests.

    Only an English Parliament can properly represent the interests of the English people.

  2. Frederick Peterson
    Frederick Peterson says:

    As a long-term admirer of Dr. Macdonald’s work and someone who also appreciates Tobias Langdon’s contributions here it’s with some trepidation that I open my commentary innings here with what may seem to many as a heretical observation. Notwithstanding the abundant evidence that the involvement of Jewish activists in western political, cultural and social life has been almost entirely malevolent, especially in the postwar period, I wonder whether we are at risk of taking an overly monocausalist approach to the causes behind the immigration disaster that now afflicts western Europe and the UK in particular. I specifically exclude the United States from this proposition since Dr. Macdonald has documented fully and without question the crucial Jewish involvement in the ‘liberalisation’ of US immigration policy during the 20th century.

    I don’t believe that a similarly compelling case has yet been presented for a decisive Jewish role in Europe’s immigration debacle, especially at the policy level. On the other hand, such a role has been well established in the field of ‘anti-discrimination’ or ‘equalities’ policy, as ably documented by Andrew Joyce in the TOO article linked. Although related, ‘race relations’ and ‘E&D’ are distinctly separate from immigration from a policy perspective and should be treated as such.

    PS could somebody kindly what what, if any, HTML tags are supported in the comments section here. TIA.

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      01 Without immigration, there would be no ‘ race relations ‘ problem. Haaretz recently published a disclosure by the head of the IDF. He asserted, that the Israeli Defense Minister entered Syria to confer with ‘ opposition’ forces. These, in great part mercenary forces, were well remunerated [ by whom ] and cared for by IDF field hospitals on the Israeli side. Of course, ludicrously, this merely fulfilled their obligations under their faith; as they themselves boasted, while, in reality, representing the supply side of our destruction.

      Even at first glance, lateral strands of this artfully woven black-widow spider web are essential to its structure. Unlike you, I am unable to separate them.

      02 From how many countries has ‘ monocausal ‘ Soros been evicted ?

      03 Jewish lobbying in every crevice of the EU is overwhelming.

      04 Yes, it’s not only Jews. Globalists like Friedrich Merz, about to replace Merkel as CDU/CSU party-chief in December, and shortly thereafter probably as Chancellor, also do their part, for their known economic and fiscal reasons.

      Like Merkel, he too favors the creation of an EU Armed Forces; the better to bar a further disintegration of the EU; on the horizon.

      05 Also, on Dec. 10-11, we have the worldwide UN Conference in Marrakech, to sign the already prepared Compact on Immigration.

      The always brilliantly informed and superbly analytical editorial of the Munich ‘ Deutsche National Zeitung ‘, definitively opposing the Compact, saw the greatest danger to lie in the fact that it was not binding. This, they said, would make it more acceptable to the German electorate, since it only issues ‘ guidelines’.

      These guidelines, however, would create a modus operandi, which, ultimately, would lead to sporadic, then comprehensive binding legislation. Yes, that’s how the creeps creep: all slugs leave a slimy trail.

      Then you will have your policy-level immigration determinants.

        • Trenchant
          Trenchant says:

          Thank you. You should consider submitting that excellent post for publication by TOO as an article.

      • Trenchant
        Trenchant says:

        From the Joyce article posted above, at its inception, Third World immigration to Britain was indeed ascribable to Jewish activism alone. Necessary but also sufficient.

        • Frederick Peterson
          Frederick Peterson says:

          I’m familiar with the proposition but would just re-iterate the view that the gold standard in presenting a persuasive and incontrovertible case for a decisive Jewish role in formulating national immigration policy has been provided by Dr. MacDonald in his seminal paper “Jewish Involvement in Shaping American Immigration Policy, 1881-1965: A Historical Review”.

          I have yet to come across a similarly convincing case for a significant and decisive Jewish involvement in UK policy, either here or elsewhere. That’s not to say that such a case could never be made, but rather that it has not been made so far. We need to keep in mind that the plural of anecdote is not ‘data’, especially when the anecdotal stories are unsourced and therefor unverifiable.

  3. Curmudgeon
    Curmudgeon says:

    Ironic that the Scots, who began migration from Ireland to Scotland late in the Roman era, and through the Declaration of Arbroath claimed to be one of the tribes of Israel:
    “Most Holy Father and Lord, we know and from the chronicles and books of the ancients we find that among other famous nations our own, the Scots, has been graced with widespread renown. They journeyed from Greater Scythia by way of the Tyrrhenian Sea and the Pillars of Hercules, and dwelt for a long course of time in Spain among the most savage tribes, but nowhere could they be subdued by any race, however barbarous. Thence they came, twelve hundred years after the people of Israel crossed the Red Sea, to their home in the west where they still live today.”
    would be considered “anti-Semitic” and take their direction from non-Semitic Ashkenazim.

    Mr. Langdon is quite correct in denouncing the SNP in its current form. The handful of SNP type supporters I met 45+ years ago were ethnic nationalists and made no bones about it.

    • Erika
      Erika says:

      When I attended Sunday School (Church of Scotland) around 1960 our minister stated that although Jews had been God’s chosen people, we Scots were now the chosen people. He never provided evidence for either belief, but that is what we were taught.

      • Sandy
        Sandy says:

        He might have been alluding to the British Israel belief in that, for example, the Stone of Scone came from Palestine and turned over three times is now in London. I assume you still abide in the old country so you could try http://www.britishisrael.co.uk/ for further investigation.

  4. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    If memory serves, there are four fallacies in Formal Logic. One is ” the fallacy of sweeping authority “, ie the claim, ” that everyone knows such and such…,”; which doesn’t make it a fact. [ Look at Historiography or current Washington ! ]

    What is the population of Scotland ? What percentage can be attributed to
    your or ” yours, Scotland “, beyond its usual suspect proponents ?

  5. matthew Roberts
    matthew Roberts says:

    There is a country called England too, just in case you forgot. We would also like our independence.

  6. Hatecrime Hotline
    Hatecrime Hotline says:

    One of the most terrifying aspects of the SNP and their psychopathic leadership, is that they genuinely view the Nordic/Scandinavian model – including its current status – as something to be emulated. Since Sturgeon was given the purple cushion to place her deranged carcass onto, the SNP have become without doubt a Feminist party. In employment in particular, the anti-man sexism in the Scottish region is institutionalized and marches on without chide or challenge. And, as you’d expect, the SNP’s support for LGBT privileges is very much of the Swedish variety – that is to say, pathological, which is very ironic to me, being a Burns’ country Scotsman of Swedish paternal heritage.

    Outwardly, the SNP don’t appear to have some kind of conspiratorial plan to eradicate Aryan civilization from the Northern-most part of Britain; to all intents-and-purposes, they appear to truly believe in the nation-wrecking nonsense they preach from their rainbow-coloured pulpit, again, much like what we see and hear in Sweden.

    There are members of the SNP who, in the late 70s and early 80s created an external SNP faction called the ’79 Group’ that were explicitly Marxist, that is to say, internationalist and classist. Sadly, these boomer Marxists did succeed in realigning the direction of the SNP’s political compass from Centre-right, to rigidly Left-wing. One of the founders of the Marxist ’79 Group’ faction, a certain Alex Salmond, went on to rule the SNP from 1990-2014 (excepting 4 short years at the turn of the millenium), and became First Minster
    of Scotland from 2007-2014. Many in the SNP today would refuse the appellation ‘Left’, preferring the less abrasive ‘Centre-left’, but as the learned author of this excellent article points out for us, the SNP are Left to a degree that one would normally associate with authoritarian Socialist regime, and there are for sure admirers of the Chinese state within the SNP’s functional ranks. https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/16147332.snp-is-wildly-irresponsible-on-chinas-confucius-institutes/

    Naturally, the same contradictions are found in the SNP as are found within the Democratic parties of the Nordlands and other parts of the West: they are ‘socialist’, and ‘for the people (especially the down-trodden ̶w̶o̶r̶k̶i̶n̶g̶-̶c̶l̶a̶s̶s̶ minorities), yet they sell of prime assets to predatory private firms abroad, much like their supposed ‘arch-enemy’ the Tories. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-43661529

    Native people here are in a sorry state. There is a monolithic crisis of collective confidence amongst the people. The family unit has taken a real “doing” as we say here, decades of mass unemployment, underemployment and the destruction of local industries and local trades has delivered a permanent black cloud to the Scottish people’s outlook. There is a rampant inferiority complex at the collective level, and it is frightening how often one encounters it amongst people (including middle classes) on a personal level. As you’d expect, such mentalities do not make parenting entirely fruitful, or rewarding for the children, and so the never-ending spiral continues. Like most nations, in Scotland many white people, will, in private admit that they see no sense in the flooding of their host nations with foreign races. But, when the gauntlet is down, they buckle like the rest.

    Personally, in my corner of this land, i’ve found my antagonism towards the LGBT abomination to be the one that gets the least support. There is a definitely a ‘masculinized-effeminacy’ (if i may use that term) at the spearhead of those wishing to write the script for the social future, and so homosexuals and the various other perverts are frequently defended with the same strength and given the same protection as children are. But then again, Scotland is also a TV-binge-watching country, especially the women over 30.

    As far as i can see it, Scotland, from a social, political and even racial point of view, is in exactly the same camp as Sweden, but if anything is more authoritarian. I cannot imagine a Scottish equivalent of the Nordic Resistance Movement being allowed to develop and proselytize here – from conception they’d be pulled out from the roots and burned to dust with Puritanical zeal!

    I can only shrug my shoulders, sigh, and mumble, “they know not what they do.”

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      JM:
      A caveat about that ” honest and thoughtful ” Rabbi ! Partially honest where it costs nothing, but purposefully thoughtful.
      01 He objectively agrees, that we are entitled to retain our civilization. A fact not requiring his approbation.
      02 He states, that secular, assimilated, merely biological Jews were and are active in our disintegration.
      03 He denies our contention, that, in large part, they are doing this as reprisal against wrongs committed by us against them.
      A lust for revenge, prohibited by the Torah; again, only pursued by secular, biological, Jews.
      04 You can’t get more biologically, religiously and racially Jewish than that idiot/savant Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, whom Haaretz termed the ” King maker of Israeli politics “: who was the Chief Rabbi of Israel for the Sephardim. Even the conservative Israeli press was taken aback by most of his severely racial hate remarks, immediately prior to his death in 13, against all non-Jews: calling them donkeys only fit to plow their fields, to harvest them and to feed the Jews, ” WHILE THEY SIT AND EAT LIKE EFFENDI ” .
      [ Direct quote ].
      05 How many of the Haaretz reported ca. 800,000, more than merely biological Jews, at this prolific Halacha writer’s funeral did this video Rabbi consult about their support, or lack thereof, of destroying the goyim ?
      06 Once again, though nicely packaged, we are the problem.
      07 If I may, a position far removed from anything KM has to say on the problem; except for our right to continue to exist, independent of what the Rabbi generously concedes.

      • Trenchant
        Trenchant says:

        In addition, he quoted exclusively from the Torah. No mention of talmudic writings on the status of goyim.

    • John Frum
      John Frum says:

      Music for our ears. Brings water in the Jewish mill. Changes nothing for us. Convinces 0 Jews to stop their mischief, that is genocide against White people.

  7. elizabeth
    elizabeth says:

    Scotland was the one which conquered so many places on the globe. I often remember how the sound and sight of the mighty Scots coming over the hill with their bagpipes rightly stuck fear in the heart of their enemies.

  8. CalgacusUbermensch
    CalgacusUbermensch says:

    The SNP have to play the same “virtue signalling” games as almost every other political party in the UK or West.

    Why should they make their lives even more difficult?

    If you -really- want INDEPENDENCE and you’re not just some rightwing SHILL – the SNP is the ONLY party in Scotland which supports it.

    Independence, first and foremost, ABOVE ALL OTHERS.

    Once independent, you can vote for whoever you want – a Paul McPot or a Jock Duterte – even ADOLF-Fucking-McSporran, if you want.

    That is the point -DEMOCRACY- you will now GET THE GOVT YOU VOTED FOR – it’s really SIMPLE, I shouldn’t have to explain it, I mean, the people at OO are all big-brains, right?

    What makes you think the SNP will be in power forever – or will not change their policies to stay in power? Or new parties emerge?

    When the SNP had an ethno-nationalist component, it did nothing. The adoption of civic nationalism and social democracy proved to be a brilliant strategy. In it to win it, eh?

    Or else we could all be sitting around being pure and ethnic, arguing who are “the real Scots” and who is or isn’t Scottish, while Scotland continues to be RAVAGED by its CATASTROPHICALLY EXPLOITATIVE relationship with a PARASITIC England.

  9. John Frum
    John Frum says:

    You cannot have the cake and eat it too. You want an independent Scotland, under the right leadership. Let’s make do with what we can actually perform, in the best interests of beleaguered whites.
    Scotland and to lesser extent Northern Ireland have taken England and Wales hostage, all the way to extinction. Unfortunately, the English people cannot hold a referendum whether they want Scotland to go. Should there be a referendum, it would be a delight. We must first support Northern Ireland to go either independent, or better still join the Republic. I fully support Scottish independence, not on some folkloristic motives, but as to fracture Jewish power. Let them go to EU or wherever they want. EU is dying anyway. Jews have a field trip with concentrated power.

    • William Gruff
      William Gruff says:

      We English are in the unique position, within the ‘U’K, of being able to give the peoples of the little nations their independence whether they want it or not. Personally, I’m all in favour of doing so.

        • William Gruff
          William Gruff says:

          I’m flattered that you think I have the power to do such things. Had I, Scotland would be begging Norway for money for Buckfast and apologising for stealing the Shetland Islands.

          The point of your comment is not entirely clear (whether you are Scotch seeking the independence your countrymen so often threaten us with but fear to vote for or English wanting rid of an ancient nuisance), however, the people of England comprise about eighty five per cent of the ‘United’ Kingdom total and were we to vote to cut the little nations of the ‘union’ adrift off they’d go, which is why there is no intention of allowing us to. The population of Scotland is very nearly equal to the non existent region of Yorkshire and Humberside, that of Wales to the equally non existent region of the North East of England and that of Northern Ireland not so very much greater than the city of Birmingham. Put together they number about the same as Greater London, which is about half the population of the non existent region of South East England. Were we in England inclined to give the little nations their long whined for independence they’d get it, unless the British government worked as hard to frustrate the English desire for independence from a disadvantageous union as it has to confound Brexit.

  10. JM
    JM says:

    @Charles Frey
    On the issue of the Russian Revolution. It is true that this would not have occurred without activist Jews and that there was a disproportion of Jews in the central bodies of the government. The same for the crimes against the Russian people. But the reality was that the Bolsheviks offered the only alternative to getting the Russian people out of the carnage of the criminal war (one which was eagerly executed by gentile criminals in the major hostile nations) arising in large part from the incompetence of the existing regimes, including the existing ‘revolutionary’ government. It thus had a mass following among the Russian lower classes: the vast bulk of the Russian people. I also believe that a great number of Jews entered into this project, believing what it claimed to be and not just for tribal vengeance or as part of an international conspiracy. That’s why they nationalized, not just the land, but also manufacturing industry, the banks and mass media, the latter two accomplishments, in the right hands, would largely solve the problems of subversion faced by Western nations today, tasks which are very rarely addressed by those who claim to represent the interests of Western nations.
    The rabbi posted was expressing opinions regarding his understanding of the Torah and the obligation of Jews, not giving a description of the practice of most religious leaders. Thus, for the uninitiated, this would be deceptive, but how many of such people would view such a video? If they did, they’d at least learn that many secularized Jews are active in subverting the West (para: ‘because they seek assimilation by degrading the national pride of these nations partly through swamping them with alien people and cultures’.

  11. JM
    JM says:

    @John Frum:
    “I fully support Scottish independence, not on some folkloristic motives, but as to fracture Jewish power.”
    Pure fantasy and maybe worse. As if subversives would oppose the Balkanisation of once united western nations and as if the SNP leadership isn’t fully aware of their treachery. There was a big component of ‘Soros’ money in the Catalan independence movement and likely the same behind the “SNP”.

    http://www.voltairenet.org/article198106.html

    • John Frum
      John Frum says:

      I cannot understand the interest of Soros in the fracturing of Spain, which would bring about the fracturing of EU, which Soros holds dear.

  12. T.Gilligan
    T.Gilligan says:

    Today I picked up a copy of the London Evening Standard, my expectations low and cynicism primed but here on the editorial page,18, is a headline in bold print ‘ Migration has always been an essential part of British life’, penned by Barbara (Batella) Roche. Roche is creating a ‘Migration Museum’, and she states as chair of this soon- to- be exhibition and organisation, ‘Migration is an integral part of who we are’. This is nightmarish: a propaganda genocide. How apt that a group of cockroaches is collectively called an Intrusion.
    March 15th 2004 is the date of Kriss Donald’s demise and I will in some shape of form commorate this date. Wikipedia description of Kriss Donald as a “Scottish white male” and the vermin that killed him as ”A gang of men of Pakistani origin”. In other words Scottish males come in a myriad of colours and his murder has nothing to do with the Scottish Government people replacement policy.

  13. CalgacusUbermensch
    CalgacusUbermensch says:

    This whole article is a case of – “sound bricks, shoddy edifice”.

    If you took it to a Scottish Court you would get a NOT PROVEN.

    The irony from the English right, esp. media is that they say – “the SNP are a bunch of NAZIS who just HATE the ENGLISH” – you cannot win – get shit for being “xenophobic ethnic nationalists” on one hand, then get shit for NOT being ethno-nationalist-enough on t’other.

    Some miscellany –

    Kriss Donald’s murderer – “Baldy” Shahid had a dumb-bell dropped on his head in the prison gym – there is video of it online. He now sits in his cell a “broken man” scared to come out. Gangster wannabe.

    Scotland does not have an overt Jewish problem – what it does have is a FREEMASON problem, which is crypto- “judaism for gentiles” / 2nd rate kikery operation. They are the unionist establishment – its the same for the entire UK.

    Every spook agency has been looking for dirt on the SNP since they first got popular and found nothing /zilch /nada – a couple who won the lottery gave them a large donation – but its their money, innit. If you want “dark money” check the Tories. If Soros money was around, I think they would have found it.

    Scots HAVE fallen for an easy, soft-minded form of multiculturalism, but its only because they like to think of themselves as open and friendly – and have had NO serious dealings with foreigners in great numbers or concentrations. The asians are at 4%, pretty much under control, almost no blacks. The asylum seekers and Roma dumped in Govanhill, Glasgow started to cause real problems and its getting shut down. England has 100s of “govanhills” all coalescing into a single caliphate.

    Fundamentally – how do you get LESS of GLOBOHOMO MULTIKULTI SHOAH-WORSHIP by staying IN the UK? How does that work –

    England gets KIKED in 1700, taken over by 1900
    Niggered in 1970
    Paki-ed in 1980

    England / Britain is the ORIGINAL ZOG – so how is LEAVING it “selling out to the GLOBALISTS”? Despite all that has gone on Scotland remains overwhelmingly “white” and culturally homogeneous – with some asian spice. Staying in the UK -threatens- this. England has ruined itself – not my problem.

    And the big joke about all of this is – English retirees from the Home Counties sell up, move to Scotland, then bore your arse off about how “nice” it is and how “England is not what it was” … but will not explore this further, then vote NO in the independence referendum.

    Interesting point – the UK is formed by treaty, the act of union – the kingdoms of Scotland and England equal signatories, each with the power to dissolve the union should its terms be breached.

    In theory, either party could dissolve it and walk away. Scotland could legally become independent in this manner … but who’s kidding who – realpolitik, “facts on the ground”, and the ultimate “law of force” comes into play. Scotland doesn’t get to walk away like that. It’s the same story with the man in the street – your legal rights and your ability to exercise them are often in stark mismatch.

    – England however, COULD do this. If public petition was high, an English referendum to dissolve the Union could be held and Scots could do nothing about it.

    It is probably a good thing knowledge of history and constitutional law is so meagre among the English. Given the constant propaganda about Scotland’s “subsidy junkie”-status and the myth of exorbitant indulgence to the ungrateful Jocks from the taxes of the English … the ordinary Tommy would probably -enthusiastically- say “good riddance to those whining jocks – we are better off without them!”

    The English elites know different, of course. Scotland is a massive source of wealth to the UK and its true nature hidden by dodgy accounting. 44billion barrels of oil, at last count, and more to come – and that’s just for starters. You could even ignore the oil in this account and the argument still holds.

    Empire is always a looting operation – if colonies cannot pay for themselves and then some, why have them? There is also the more subtle point about what exactly the City does – a strange kind of alchemy that no one understands – it trades in “claims on wealth” which ultimately, need to be backed by “real wealth” – Scotland has most of the real wealth. England knows this, the City knows this, but will never admit it. England doesn’t make anything anymore – all the good jobs went east and what was left were sweet financial gigs or race to the bottom stuff, zero hours contracts, “self employment”, uber and amazon wage slavery. Forex speculators know this fine well.

    The false accounting with regard to Scotland was first, probably, noticed by a civil servant called John Jappy – he prepared the actual numbers, then started to notice his work was being disappeared. The man died some years ago, but his website may still be up. Then there is the infamous McCrone report, suppressed by the Labour govt in the 70s.

    The UK is a perverse, unnatural thing – like a pantomime horse, and Scotland is in the back, getting farted on. Time for us to go, cut the rope, be a normal country again. Being an independent equal member of an imperfect sprawling federation is a MUCH better deal than being the exploited last vassal and colony of a busted empire.

    • William Gruff
      William Gruff says:

      [Moderator note: I’m letting this thru for once, but please note that talking as our enemies would wish us to talk is not wise. That’s assuming you’re not a hasbara.]

      You make the usual Scotch mistake of believing the ‘United’ Kingdom’s share of North Sea oil to be Scotland’s property, it isn’t, nor is the gas. The rest of your puerile Anglophobic drivel is as ill-informed and warped.

  14. Marieinbethpage
    Marieinbethpage says:

    These women did not get to the top because of their high intelligence or libertarianism. On the contrary, they were typical authoritarian politicians: bullet-headed, short- haired and high-testosterone. Fat. You forgot fat. They’re all fat.

Comments are closed.