Justice for Jussie: Hate-Hoaxes and the Ideological Sickness of the Modern West

If you want to understand the hate-hoax perpetrated by the gay “Black-Jewish actor” Jussie Smollett one freezing Chicago night in late January 2019, it helps to go back to a book published twelve years before and thousands of miles away in Britain:

Multiculturalism promotes segregation, stifles free speech and threatens liberal democracy, Britain’s top Jewish official warned in extracts from [a recently published] book … Jonathan Sacks, Britain’s [then] chief rabbi, defined multiculturalism as an attempt to affirm Britain’s diverse communities and make ethnic and religious minorities more appreciated and respected. But in his book, The Home We Build Together: Recreating Society, he said the movement had run its course. “Multiculturalism has led not to integration but to segregation,” Sacks wrote in his book, an extract of which was published in the Times of London.

“Liberal democracy is in danger,” Sacks said, adding later: “The politics of freedom risks descending into the politics of fear.” Sacks said Britain’s politics had been poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment. The process, he said, began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays. He said the effect had been “inexorably divisive. A culture of victimhood sets group against group, each claiming that its pain, injury, oppression, humiliation is greater than that of others,” he said. In an interview with the Times, Sacks said he wanted his book to be “politically incorrect in the highest order.” (Sacks: Multiculturalism threatens democracy, The Jerusalem Post, 20th October 2007)

Let’s have Rabbi Sacks’ hate-think again: “The [poisonous culture of victimhood] began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays.” Jussie Smollett literally embodies three of those groups. He’s the embodiment of an intersectional dream — gay, Black and Jewish. His mother is “African-American” and his father was from a family of Russian and Polish Jews. No wonder Smollett smouldered to be seen as a victim of “pain, injury, oppression, [and] humiliation.” But because no White Trump-supporter was willing to supply him with those valuable commodities for free, he had to manufacture them for himself with the aid of two Nigerian bodybuilders.

The least likely White Supremacists on the planet

But I must admit that the sudden and spectacular collapse of Smollett’s hate-hoax took me by surprise. Like everyone with an even vaguely functional bullshit-detector, I never believed his story. He’s famous among liberals, not among Trump-supporters. What were the odds that two homophobic and racist MAGA-fans, ready-equipped with rope and bleach, would encounter and recognize him as they roamed the streets on the coldest night of the year in one of the most liberal cities in America? No, I didn’t believe a word of it. But I was worried that the Chicago police would never find proof that his story was as false as Chuck Schumer’s smile. Well, the police have found abundant proof, and of the most hilarious kind. The buff Black brothers Olabinjo and Abimbola Osundairo are perhaps the least likely White supremacists on the planet.

B.B. Kings: Buff Blacks Olabinjo and Abimbola Osundairo

The Osundairo brothers are as Black as they come. And so they’re unlike Smollett himself, whose relatively light skin and homosexuality may have helped shape his anti-White and anti-Trump psychology. Identity politics is, in part, uncertainty-about-identity politics, because it’s often driven by the desire of marginal people to prove that they really belong to some sacred racial minority. As Steve Sailer has pointed out, the leaders of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement are disproportionately gay. Large numbers of Blacks reject homosexuality as weak, effeminate and White-acting, so some gay Blacks feel the need to assert their Blackness as unmistakably as possible. What better way than to identify with and campaign for hyper-Black street-thugs like Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown? Accordingly, BLM is at least as much a reaction to genuine Black homophobia as it is to alleged White racism.

“Seeing a Black body terrorized…”

But the liberal media ignore the homophobia of Blacks just as they ignore the homophobia of Muslims. When hate-thinkers expressed doubts about Jussie Smollett’s story, the Black journalist Arielle Gray vigorously defended him at Vice, lamenting the terror and violence inflicted on the “black bodies” of “queer and trans people of color,” or QTPOC for short:

Doubting that a hate crime could happen reflects the general ignorance of the daily violence queer and trans people of color face and endure every day. Nuanced and existing at a myriad of different intersections, the attack on Smollett represents a unique form of racialized queerphobia that impacts QTPOC. Seeing a Black body terrorized because of race and sexual orientation is an all too familiar scene to the QTPOC community, which is why accepting it as reality wasn’t a problem for us when it seemed difficult for those doubters to believe. (Jussie Smollett Reminds Us That Fame Doesn’t Protect Queer and Trans POC, Vice, 14th February 2019)

But who is inflicting that “daily violence” on “queer and trans people of color”? It isn’t Whites or Trump-supporters: it is other “people of color.” The title of Arielle Gray’s article is completely wrong. Fame does protect “Queer and Trans POC,” because it means they can live in wealthier, and therefore Whiter, places and move in Whiter, and therefore less prejudiced, circles. This obvious truth is unacceptable to the cult of minority worship, wherein all vice is assigned to the White majority and all virtue to minorities. When reality contradicts dogma, liberals are in no doubt that reality must give way. And so they will censor key facts in stories about sacred minorities.

Schwirtz’s schmaltz

For example, in September 2013 the New York Times (NYT) ran a schmaltzy story entitled “Embarking on a New Life, Transgender Woman Has It Brutally Taken.” It was written by the possibly Jewish journalist Michael Schwirtz (who was nominated for a Pulitzer with Michael Winerip and Robert Gebeloff for exposing such things as “The Scourge of Racial Bias In New York State’s Prisons”). This 2013 story was about a young Black man called Vaughn Nettles who “had begun to live publicly as transgender.” Having taken this admirable step, Nettles metamorphosed “seemingly overnight … from a shy and insecure youth into a radiantly confident young woman.” In his new persona as a woman called Islan Nettles, he encountered and possibly flirted with “a young man.”

But the “young man” reacted badly to the subsequent discovery that this “radiantly confident young woman” was not in fact a woman after all. Michael Schwirtz described how the “young man” “knocked [Nettles] to the ground after learning she was transgender and struck her with his fists until she was unconscious and battered beyond recognition.” Nettles went into a coma and died “less than a week later.”

Fit to Print for the NYT: Vaughn Nettles’ mother and supporters

And Schwirtz wrote a lot more than that as he ladled schmaltz on an undoubted tragedy. He was also very careful never to “misgender” Vaughn Nettles by referring to him with male pronouns. But Schwirtz failed to provide any more details of the “young man” who had allegedly murdered Nettles. And when a 24-year-old called James Dixon was arrested in 2015 and charged with the murder after a long police investigation, the New York Times did not see fit to supply any photos of Dixon. There and elsewhere it supplied photos of Vaughn Nettles, of his devastated mother and of Blacks grieving his death. But that was it.

Why the cover-up? It’s simple. The Times didn’t want to admit the truth: that James Dixon is Black. And in fact, I have sympathy for him. The Times reported that a few days before his encounter with Vaughn Nettles, Dixon had been “deeply embarrassed when two transgender women approached him while he was doing pull-ups on a scaffolding at 138th Street and Eighth Avenue. Not realizing they were transgender, he flirted with them, he said, and was teased badly by his friends.”

Not Fit to Print for the NYT: James Dixon and his victim Vaughn Nettles

In other words, Black transphobia primed Dixon to react violently when something similar happened: Dixon approached and flirted with Nettles without realizing his true sex. When Dixon discovered the truth, he became angry and beat Nettles into a coma. That was wrong, but completely comprehensible: Black culture is violent and retributive, and Nettles had tried to trick him. As Dixon said: “I don’t care what they [transgender people] do. I just didn’t want to be fooled.” This was in fact a double tragedy for the “black community,” as liberals like to call it. One young Black man, Vaughn Nettles, lost his life and another young Black man, James Dixon, has badly harmed his own life, because he pleaded guilty to “first degree manslaughter” and is now serving twelve years in jail under a plea deal.

No Nuance for the NYT

But the New York Times couldn’t admit such “nuance” in the story. The transgender Nettles was the saintly victim, the transphobic Dixon was the evil victimizer. That’s why the Times did not reveal that James Dixon is Black. His race does not fit the Narrative of minority worship, whereby all vice is assigned to the White majority and all virtue to minorities.

Minority worship also explains why Jussie Smollett perpetrated his hate-hoax in 2019. There are vast rewards for victimhood in modern culture (making it a great career-move for Fauxcahontas to claim victimhood as a Native American). But being the victim of a hate-crime earns one even more stripes, and many enterprising folk therefore set out to manufacture hate-crimes for themselves. Hate-hoaxes have been happening for decades, repeatedly fooling liberals who pride themselves on their razor-sharp scepticism and intellectual sophistication.

They’re deluding themselves, because they’re not sceptical or sophisticated at all. Instead, they’re credulous and superstitious. As Steve Sailer has often pointed out, liberals are very familiar with the concept of hate-crime, but “the concept of a ‘hate hoax’ has been successfully kept out of the mainstream mentality.” At least until now.

The martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence

But even genuine “hate-crimes” can be hate-hoaxes in an important sense. Minority worship also flourishes in England, whose patron saint in 2019 is not St George but St Stephen, the Black teenager murdered by a gang of White racists in London in 1993. The martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence, overseen by the anti-White Jewish liberal Dr Richard Stone, is a hate-hoax in the sense that it advances a vast lie. According to the Lawrence cult, vicious and hate-filled Whites are an ominous and ever-present threat to the lives and well-being of virtuous and love-filled minorities.

This is the opposite of the truth. Minorities like Blacks and Muslims murder, rape and otherwise harm far more Whites than vice versa. Dark-skinned Muslims are still a minority in places like Rotherham, Huddersfield and Oxford, for example, but they have raped thousands of White girls since mass immigration was first imposed on the White British by our corrupt and hostile liberal elite. Meanwhile, liberal newspapers like the Guardian wring their hands over the knife-crime in London that claims so many young Black lives. But who is committing the knife-crime? Other young Blacks. The cult of Stephen Lawrence makes the problem worse, because it accuses the police of “institutional racism” and makes them reluctant to enforce the law against non-Whites. The cult also supplies part of the answer to the Riddle of Rotherham. Why did the police and Labour council ignore the horrific crimes being committed against White girls under their noses? Because the criminals were non-White and therefore sacred. When reality contradicts dogma, liberals are in no doubt that reality must give way.

Jewish double-think: Jews can celebrate Jewish wealth and power, but goyim must never mention them

But liberals too can fall victim to the truth-denying, lie-promoting ideology that rules the modern West. Ilhan Omar is a Somali Muslim woman whose election to Congress in 2018 was greeted with shrieks of joy, not least by the Jews who see Muslims like Omar as “natural allies” in the fight against White Christian culture, history and traditions. But then Omar spoke an inconvenient truth, pointing out that Jewish wealth (“It’s all about the Benjamins, baby!”) brings Jews disproportionate political influence and control. This time she invoked shrieks of outrage, not of joy. Omar is an unintelligent Black grievance-monger, but she has experienced the power of Jewish ideology in the same way as the great White scientist James Watson. In January 2019, Watson was once again condemned and punished for pointing out that Black failure has its roots in Black genetics, not in White racism.

The sickness and the solution

What happened to Omar and Watson proves that America is presently ruled by a very sick political ideology that punishes truth-tellers and rewards liars. Jussie Smollett tried to take advantage of that ideology by presenting himself as a victim of “white hate.” His story was ludicrous from the beginning, but he received the full support of powerful liberals like Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders. They wanted “Justice for Jussie” because his identity as a Black-Jewish homosexual automatically elevated him to sainthood. And how could a non-White saint tell lies about being the victim of White hate?

Very easily, it turned out. But those powerful liberals will not suffer any penalties for their credulity or for their eagerness to believe the worst of Trump-supporters. Indeed, their only regret will be that the truth about Smollett’s hoax has emerged. And they will be more determined than ever to keep America’s borders open and new Democrat voters flooding in. You can find the same liberals and the same love of open borders throughout the West. Liberals know they don’t have reality, sanity or morality on their side, which is why they want to import Third-World foot-soldiers to win their war on the West.

Jussie Smollett’s hate-hoax involved one Black-Jewish homosexual and two Black Nigerians. That makes it a perfect symbol of what is wrong with the West and how the West can be put right. Minority worship needs to end and non-Whites need to return where they belong.

29 replies
  1. John King
    John King says:

    This is a very fascinating article. The Occidental Observer is one of the true leaders in undoing the web of lies and half-truths, of suppressions and unwarranted celebrations, that the mainstream media foists upon us under the guise of “news”. What is more, unlike the NYT, the authors who write for the OO have the intellectual tools to help explain how and why this web of lies cannot deal adequately with the very issues it chooses to focus so much attention on. I salute the author for his fine piece of detective work and his analytical skills in offering a cogent solution to the Mystery of the Disappearing Dixon.

    • Danielle
      Danielle says:

      John King, if your paragraph here is any indication, you have much to contribute in the way of writing for our cause, as well.

  2. HK Wills
    HK Wills says:

    I do not think I am alone in decrying the widespread use of the propagandistic term “homophobic” by numerous writers and commentators including those on the Right. Phobia’s are irrational fears and irrational fears are a form of psychological pathology. But most normal – yes normal – people are not afraid of homosexuals; they find them disgusting and immoral. It was a neat and aggressive trick of the homosexual lobby to ascribe what they suffer from to those who disapprove of them. What term should be used for anti-homosexual bias ? How about anti-degenerate or anti-sodomite ? Even if one could take exception to these terms, in a culture war what is important about a term is not necessarily its accuracy but its efficacy as a weapon.

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      You are quite correct in your assessment of phobias. However, the problem of misuse of terminology goes much deeper. In the case of the murdered Islan Nettles, a lot seems to be difficult to confirm. Assuming that Nettles was truly transgendered, i.e. had his male genitalia removed and a vagina reconstructed, How would Dixon, and the other Black man originally charged, Paris Wilson, have known? The only way would be if Nettles disclosed it. Why would a “radiant” now female, person disclose it when vaginoplasty is the new rage, and he/she could pass off the reconstruction as cosmetic surgery?
      My guess is that Nettles still had his genetalia and was found out, or disclosed it. That means Nettles was not trans anything. He was a cross dresser. That goes for most of those claiming to be “transgender”. The cost of surgery to do the penectomy and orchiectomy with vaginal reconstruction is well beyond the ability of most to pay for it much less a 21 year old previously homeless Black man. That doesn’t include breast implants or hormone treatments to develop breasts and female characteristics.
      We are awash in deceit through the misuse of our language.

    • Tim Folke.
      Tim Folke. says:

      My thoughts exactly as well as those of countless others. Ditto transpohobe, islamaphobe, etceteraphobe, ad nauseam.

    • Red Pill Pharmacy
      Red Pill Pharmacy says:

      Language is critical. Hence the barbarians are systematically scrubbing and distorting it. Example: said perversion went from being stigmatized as “sodomite” to being morally neutralized as “homosexual” to today’s celebratory “gay.” This is a diabolical inversion, one of legions of such inversions flowing from today’s reigning diabolical disorientation. This diabolical disorientation indeed infects most of those on the “right,“ who routinely and unthinkingly use the words “homosexual“ and even “gay“ to describe sodomite perverts. The stigma must be restored.

  3. Danielle
    Danielle says:

    Bravo, Mr. Langdon…this is, indeed, a sickness, and there is nothing wrong, prejudiced, or hateful in calling this minority worship and subsequent elavation to sainthood for exactly what it is, as well as why it is liberals are applying this rationale.

  4. Red Pill Pharmacy
    Red Pill Pharmacy says:

    What the hell kind of name is “Jussie” anyway?!

    At any rate, I sense that more and more white people are awakening to reality. This latest hate hoax has opened wider the Overton Window. Now this vocabulary of “hate hoax” has gone mainstream, whereas before it was only to be found on sites like this and Vdare. It’s crucial to continue propagating such vocabulary as “hate hoax,” “white ethnomasochist,” “suicidal xenophilia,” “pathological altruism,” “traitorous oikophobia,” etc. Without the words and terms to explain such phenomena, consciousness remains dim.


    The Forced Transformation of European Nations

    • Karen Berger
      Karen Berger says:

      The video link doesn’t work. You Tube removed the video because it violated (((their))) ‘hate speech’ policy. Meaning that whenever you expose (((them))) for what they are (((they))) censor you. Nice.
      Just as an aside, no normal grown man would use the moniker ‘Jussie’. Pathetic.
      I am providing a link to a video TOO readers might find edifying. This is what we are up against. Hope it hasn’t been taken down by the thought police.


    • MOB
      MOB says:

      RPP – regarding the forced transformation of . . .
      “This video has been removed for violating YouTube’s policy on hate speech. Learn more about combating hate speech in your country.
      Learn more”

      Every time I discover that a video I’ve put on my website is no longer accessible, I wonder what it would take for a white-controlled YouTube-like site to be created. I wonder the same thing about NPR and it’s 24/7 parade of Jewish hosts, Jewish musicians, conductors, and “arrangers,” and Jewish-flavored jokes, anecdotes, game shows, and news reports. What’s national or public about NPR? Is anyone working on “Building the Ethnostate”?

    • Jett Rucker
      Jett Rucker says:

      I believe it is of Jewish/Yiddish origin (though I admit I’ve never seen/heard of it before, for all my exposure to American-Jewish culture and people). I think it might be derived from “Yussel” which is Hebrew for Joseph.

    • Pat Kittle
      Pat Kittle says:

      Your screen name is an amusing addition to the vocabulary.

      BTW, here’s a meme:

      “First, they came for the Holocau$t deniers…”

  5. Pat Kittle
    Pat Kittle says:

    What’s the immigration status of these Nigerian body-builder dindus who conspired to commit felonies?

    They sure hit the ghetto jackpot, didn’t they — not only did they completely escape justice…

    …the (((anti-White media))) don’t publish their mug shots — instead (((they))) publish that photo of them posing shirtless with big smiles.

    (((They))) never miss an opportunity, do (((they)))?

  6. geo
    geo says:

    “When reality contradicts dogma, liberals are in no doubt that reality must give way.”
    So, put this mentally-ill people – reality deniers – in Hospital for insanity, for ever.
    Liberals, transgenders and their supporters from Universities, mass-media, legislators/lawmakers.
    They contaminated the people’s mind and are pushing the society toward colective suicide.

    • TJ
      TJ says:

      “When reality contradicts dogma, liberals are in no doubt that reality must give way.”

      Study modern “philosophy”- there is no firm, unyielding reality, as Aristotle claimed. Examine American Pragmatism- it teaches that “reality” can be bent. Marxism teaches that contradictions can exist, and not just in mans’ mind.

      Let us study the pragmatic theory of truth:


  7. Bancroft Hall
    Bancroft Hall says:

    Good Old Eddie Murphy the Black comedian from Long Island NY had multiple successful gigs in the 80s and 90s – Beverly Hills Cop (movie), Saturday Night Live (TV series), and LOTS of records and CD’s of his comedy routines. A main staple of Eddie’s humor was enthusiastic belittling of homosexuals. One of his “stand-up” routines compared breakfast cereals “Fruit Loops” and “Lucky Charms” to friend and family homosexuals — eliciting uproarious laughter from his nearly all-Black audience. I wonder if Eddie’s bash-the-homo routines would fly in today’s Hollywood

  8. Mary H
    Mary H says:

    Yet another hate hoax. Makes you wonder how many have taken place without being properly investigated to find out who actually did the crime.

    Jackson, Detroit: Transgender gay rights leader Nikki Joly, is accused of burning down own home where 2 German shepherds and 3 cats perished.

    His attorney said the lack of a motive cast doubt on the case.

    Meanwhile, a police investigative report suggests a possible reason for the fire.

    Two people who worked with Joly at St. Johns United Church of Christ, where the Jackson Pride Center was located, said he had been frustrated the controversy over gay rights had died down with the passage of the nondiscrimination law, according to the report.

  9. RoyAlbrecht
    RoyAlbrecht says:

    How many times have White Advocates been fooled into supporting one “main stream party’s candidate” over another (I.e. Rep. over Dem.) only to discover that they were fooled…, Yet Again…, by their so called “saviors” on either side?

    I understand that Trump has, on balance, moved the political discourse in a direction that has given White Advocates not only a higher profile, but more latitude than possibly any other candidate in the last hundred years aside from Adolf Hitler himself.

    Furthermore, at TOO there seems to be a taboo on openly criticizing President “Drumpf” if for the only reason that it seems there are enough forces arrayed against him as it is, so there is no need to add fuel to that fire.

    Nevertheless, my dealings with Jews spans a lifetime and if there is one thing I have learned it’s this:
    “…When Jews are cornered into facing their own nature as criminal perpetrators in the eyes of the Whites (((they))) are mass-murdering,
    no matter what social convictions they pretend to hold,
    (((they))) end up sticking together and obfuscating loudly in unison to avoid judgment.

    Of course, I see what the author above is saying and would be a fool to try to deny anything he says, but correct me if I am mistaken:
    1) Are not most of President “Drumpf’s”
    (I have to admit, he has to a degree captured my heart as well and I am somewhat proud that he comes from a German background)
    (I.e. cabinet members)
    albeit seemingly less malignant ones?

    If so, instead of jumping on the obvious Drumpf bandwagon, no matter how much my egoistic nature drives me to do it, my more (ir?)rational and suspicious nature makes me want to pull in somewhat on the reins of that bandwagon and offer a possible third option that stimulates discussions on possible fourth, fifth, and sixth options in the political spectrum.

    As is usually the case, when Jews sense that one lie is no longer working on idiot Whites, they reduce its usage and relegate it to mostly subliminal reference (I.e. the Holocaust Lie of organized Jewry).
    These days, unlike in the past, rarely do we hear of direct and open reference to the “…6 million Jews murdered by the Evil Nazis in the Holocaust…”, but instead hear only insinuations like, “…and you know where that will lead?..” or vague references to “…survivors..”, etc…
    Likewise, Trump’s open reference to the “fake news”, the “lying media”, “…criminal Mestizos…”, “…outsourcing…”, and many other “…no brainers…” are things that most people already knew before Trump came along, but just did not openly admit to.
    So in attempting to look for some pattern with respect to Jewish behaviour,
    so as to provide possible clues as to where we might be being lead,
    I’d like to proffer that the present squabbling,
    with respect to everything Trump seems to want to do and what Jews are against,
    framed into a Republican vs. Democrat battle,
    may just be a diversion from keeping Whites from taking the most obvious step of all:
    Namely that Jews are the Master Perpetrators of Sin against ALL life on Planet Earth.

    The above hypothesis is possible because EVERYBODY, from stupid Whites, Left or Right leaning, to Functionally Retarded White Inbreeds and Low Caste Third Worlders all have vague notions of Jewish Criminality…,
    they are just not sure enough,
    due to a lack of comprehension of “…the Whole Picture…” regarding the Race of Criminals (Jews),
    to espouse their suspicions openly.

    The present obvious, by almost any standard, cognitive dissonance exhibited by the so called left, may just be a way of driving the Democratic Party into the ground and thereby giving Trump,
    and his Jewish handlers by proxy,
    a clear majority in all three branches of government come 2020.
    After that…, there is no telling what may be in store for decenters like White Advocates who openly discuss the JQ.

    Is it true that absolute power corrupts absolutely?
    IMO, when Jews are involved…, you can bank on it!

  10. Andrea Ostrov Letania
    Andrea Ostrov Letania says:

    Enoch Powell of UK said mass-immigration will lead to the black man having the whip hand over the white man. But only as the overseer, it seems. The real masters are Jews. All this crazy anti-white hatred wouldn’t have turned so cancerous if not for Jewish power. For one thing, ‘white privilege’ is useful distraction from Jewish supremacist power that really rules America. Even so-called Liberal Jews feel the tribal pull before any ideological principles. And of course, the whole ‘Russia Collusion’ hysteria has really been a ploy to distract us from the real nefarious influence of Jewish deep state and media in US politics.

    But then, whites are partly to blame for Jewish behavior that has grown out of control.


    White conservatives like Ann Coulter and others ask, “We white Americans have done so much to defend Israel. When will Jews support us white people?”

    The problem is in that very assumption. The US is NOT DEFENDING Israel. If anything, Israel has long been the aggressor. Israel came into existence through Nakba pogroms that ethncially cleansed 700,000 Palestinians. Israel is occupying the remaining Palestinian territory in West Bank. Israel sends illegal settlers into West Bank to steal more land and build more Jewish towns. If you think brown caravans moving to US border are bad, just consider the Zionist caravans moving to West Bank. They come with guns and are backed up by the IDF. Worse, the US is totally complicit in this grave crime against Palestinians.

    US doesn’t defend Israel. US indulges the worst behaviors of Zionists. Besides, Israel is not endangered by neighboring nations. Jordan is essentially a US puppet. Egypt is a client state of the US and ally of Israel. Syria has been smashed and is still under Israeli attack. It will take forever for Iraq to get back on its feet. Israel has 300 nukes. Iran has ZERO.

    There is no need to defend Israel, the #1 power in the Middle East. The US has indulged and enabled Jewish supremacism and Zionist imperialism. Jews, having been spoiled and indulged so thoroughly, feel that they should have everything under the sun. “My wish is your command, goy!” Having been indulged and enabled by the West to act as aggressor but play the eternal victim, Jewish Power has come to feel that the world is its oyster. They see every people, every land, and every nation in terms of “Is it good for the Jews?” The sad truth is that the US and EU indulged such obnoxiousness among Jews by unconditionally supporting every foul thing Israel has pulled off in the Middle East. Even after attack on USS Liberty, the US defended Israel and made up lies.

    When a child is spoiled, he just acts worse. He can’t be improved with more appeasement. When an entire people are spoiled, they act like spoiled children except on a much grander scale. When Nazi Germany was allowed to get away with its early aggression, it grew ever bolder and more arrogant. When the world didn’t check Japanese imperial ambition, Japan grew increasingly reckless and unhinged. Same goes for Jews. The US, in having indulged Jews and Israel for so long, are now confronted with Jewish Power that acts like the man-eating plant in LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS. It wants more and more sacrifice.

    When Jews were occupying West Bank and stealing more land, the US didn’t stand up and say NO. To be sure, Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush tried to halt illegal Jewish encroachments into West Bank, but Jewish power did everything to unseat them. Since then, Clinton, Bush II, and Obama have given Jews everything they demanded.
    Even though illegal Jewish settlers are stealing Palestinian land in West Bank, the US position has been, “We stand with Israel”, as if Israel is the poor beleaguered party. Once Jewish power was thus indulged, flattered, and praised, Jews got to thinking that the world if their oyster and they can get away with just about anything. If they want ‘gay marriage’, they get it. If they want Wars for Israel, they get it. If they want more billions for Israel, a nation with 300 illegal nukes, they get it. If they want sanctions on Iran, a nation with no nukes, they get it. It’s long been said that Hitler shouldn’t have been appeased at Munich, but US politics has been about little more than appeasing Jewish Power to the point where it became the new Nazi-like power in the world.

    Once the spoiled, bratty, and vain Jewish Power became high on megalomania, it began to eye the US and EU as the bigger prize. The Jewish Plan for US and EU is the same as for West Bank except on a much larger scale. The only real difference is that W. Bank is to fill up with Jewish invaders whereas US and EU are to fill up with non-white immigrant-invaders. Both outcomes are good for Jewish supremacist power. More Jews in West Bank means Israel can annex it one day. More non-whites in white nations means Jewish elites can play divide-and-rule among the fractured goy masses no longer bound by common race and culture.

    Now, maybe white people thought, “If we support Jews in their endeavors, however nefarious as they may be, then they will support us whites in what we want.” But if Jews were indulged in bad behavior against Palestinians, what made whites think Jews would treat them any better? If you help someone steal something, do you think he will show gratitude toward you and not touch your property? Chances are he will next try to steal your stuff as well.
    White people made a huge mistake in supporting Jewish crimes against Palestinians. White people aided in the Nakba. White people aided in the Occupation. White people looked the other way and aided in the Jewish theft of remaining Palestinian land. From this, Jews got greedy and arrogant. Did Jews feel gratitude toward whites? No, they just saw whites as weak, wussy, easily purchased with shekels and intimidated with moral blackmail about ‘slavery’ and ‘holocaust’.

    If white people wanted Jews to act honorably, they should have supported Jews-acting-good and opposed Jews-acting-bad. But whites indulged Jews when Jews acted most foul against Palestinians. It only emboldened Jews to act in similar ways toward other peoples. Jews didn’t regard whites as honorary fellow Jews thanks to white support of Zionism. Rather, Jews bid their time and targeted whites as the Next Palestinians to tame, humiliate, and control. Since Jews themselves didn’t have the numbers to take over white nations, they chose Diversity as the trick to bring about their dream of World Control. Bring in tons of non-whites into the West, indoctrinate them with PC hatred against ‘white privilege'(not least to distract goyim from the fact of Jewish power & privilege), and also divide the whites by turning them into self-loathing cucks.
    The fact is Jews are no longer focused on survival. They are addicted to globalist supremacism. When Jews complain about ‘antisemitism’ today, they don’t mean someone who is out to harm Jews for no good reason. They mean anyone who stands in the way of Jewish supremacism worldwide. If you oppose Wars for Israel, you are an ‘anti-semite’. If you oppose the Jewish hatred against Russia and Iran, you are an ‘anti-semite’. If you call for end to immigration-invasion & preservation of the West, you are a ‘nazi’ for standing in the way of the Jewish agenda.

    White people need to ask themselves, “Do we have more in common with Jews or with Palestinians?” Jews in Israel can have secure borders. They decide who gets to immigrate to Israel: Mostly Jews. In contrast, Palestinians in West Bank have no border security. Just like the US can’t stop the illegal invasion, Palestinians in West Bank cannot stem the tide of Jewish illegal caravans who come to steal yet more land and water from Palestinians.
    Now, are whites in the US and EU more like Jews or Palestinians? Do they have the power to secure borders and control immigration? Or do whites in US and EU feel like an occupied people idehumanized by anti-white propaganda, invaded by hordes of foreigners, and ‘led’ by worthless cuck politicians who serve some nefarious power than represent the people who elected them to office?

    It seems most white patriots in US and EU feel like more like Palestinians in West Bank than Jews in Israel. Jews feel in command of their own nation. Palestinians feel helpless in West Bank. Now, why do whites in the West feel much like Palestinians in West Bank? Could it be because both groups are under the occupation of the same force: Jewish Globalist Supremacism? Do white people still hope that Jews will regard whites as equal allies or partners? Really? Judging reality by hard evidence than by childlike hope, it seems Jews regard whites as Other Palestinians than Other Jews. A people to control, manipulate, tame, and exploit than a people to embrace as fellow humans of equal worth.

    Consider Trump himself. Most of the anti-Trump vitriol has come from Jews who command the media, academia, and entertainment. And even much of anti-Trump hatred among gentiles was instilled by the Jewish-controlled media that ran endless stories about ‘Trump is literally Hitler’. (If so, does it mean Israel is literally Fascist Italy and Iran is literally Poland?) And yet, Trump is overflowing with cucky schmucky praise for the very people who have done him most harm.

    It’s the rule of power. If you indulge and reward a scoundrel, he will do the same to you. Don’t think that the scoundrel will treat you any better because you helped him do evil.

    All in all, this is how Jews think. “We are superior, Palestinians are inferior. We want lebensraum to take their land, be masters over them who shall serve us. As we are superior, we want permanent supremacy over the West as well. We must suppress any possibility of goy national solidarity. Nationalism is only for us Jews, not for dirty goyim. We shall use mass immigration-invasion to increase diversity in goy nations to ply out trade of divide and rule.”

    It’s about time white people stopped thinking in terms of “We defended Israel, so will Jews help us whites defend the West?” They need to start thinking, “Because we enabled the Jewish supremacist agenda of destroying Palestinian nationhood and people, the arrogant Jews(now filled with megalomania, greed, and confidence) are coming after us to do the same thing to us.” Indeed, what Jews are doing in West Bank is mere dress rehearsal for what they have planned for all the West: Mess up goy power so that Jewish Power shall control all the world. White people need to start asking, “Why did we indulge bad Jewish behavior for so long? What made us think that if we encourage Jewish greed, mendacity, and megalomania, Jews will be so kind, generous, and friendly with us?”

  11. Andrea Ostrov Letania
    Andrea Ostrov Letania says:

    In a way, White Guilt is really a myth. Jared Taylor and Kevin McDonald have opined that white people have his innate goodness and conscience that care about equality and justice, but is it really true? If White Guilt rooted in Conscience were genuine, it would feel equal sympathy for all the world and work for equal justice, would it not? .

    But where do you see white American guilt over 100,000s of Iraqi kids killed by sanctions? Or 100,000s more killed by Iraq War. Or about the misery in Libya due to US war. Or misery in Syria. Most white Americans, conservative or liberal, feel NOTHING. Where do you US politicians call for justice for Palestinians? They very prominent whites who mope about how US must redeem its past have NO PROBLEM backing Israel’s Jim Crowtiz policies in West Bank that is on the brink of being caravaned totally by illegal Jewish settlers.

    Contra Taylor and MacDonald, whites didn’t feel much sympathy for blacks or Americans Indians or victims of Western Imperialism for most of American history. Even most Northern whites tolerated Southern discrimination, and whites all over the world cheered for cowboys to wipe out Indians in Westerns.

    Whites began to feel differently mainly because the media and academia, especially in control by Jews, emphasized certain white evils in emotion-laden ways. Thus, white guilt isn’t something innate or natural but something emotionally devised and manipulated.
    Innately, white people feel NOTHING for anyone UNLESS manipulated into doing so.
    For example, we’ve heard endlessly about how evil South Africa was under apartheid. But in fact, the white ruled government killed far fewer people than Zionists killed the Palestinians. Also, the Afrikaner regime was downright saintly compared to Latin American regimes that were white-ruled & right-wing and, with the full backing of the US, went about using death squads to mow down literally 100,000s of people, mostly browns. And yet, white guilt regards Mandela as a god while sentimentalizing about ROMA’s(the Cuaron movie) brownie servant.
    In the end, it’s about control. When blacks were conditioned and manipulated by White Power to be obedient and loyal, they were so. But it was not about innate black loyalty or submissiveness. It was about control and conditioning. ANY people can be conditioned and controlled. Why does White Guilt care more about blacks in South Africa wronged by relatively mild Apartheid but hardly care at all about the 100,000s of browns killed by US-backed white elites in Latin America and 100,000 of Arabs & Muslims killed by Wars for Israel(pushed by white Jews)?
    White Guilt produces milk only when squeezed, and Jews are expert milkers. They milk white guilt for ‘holy blacks’ and ‘holy Jews’ pails only. After all, Jews would be in trouble IF white guilt was really real and felt for Palestinians and Syrians too(as Tulsi Gabbard does).

  12. Richard B
    Richard B says:

    “Liberals* know they don’t have reality, sanity or morality on their side, which is why they want to import Third-World foot-soldiers to win their war on the West.”

    The most difficult thing for human beings is to be able to distinguish a figure from its ground and to maintain the attributes of the figure so distinguished. In other words, identify the people, places, and things of the world, which includes ourselves. It’s not easy. Categories change, as do our judgments of those categories, the memory fades and the sense of value flickers, comes and goes. To keep it all going on a consistent basis for an individual, let alone a culture, is no small task. It requires extensive training and continuous learning. Not to mention lots of maturity and the ability to take life more seriously than one takes oneself.

    All of the above is what’s better known as living in reality. The European man (including its geographical extensions such as the USA) has done a better job of it than anyone else. And it’s a competency for which he’s left a record. An imposing, even intimidating one.

    I’ve come to the conclusion that this is the #1 reason above all others, and there are certainly others, that motivates anti-White hatred. A hatred, of course, that includes other Whites and always has.

    Human beings don’t much like reality. Hence all of the Utopias and Heavens all over the place, as well as the need for charismatic leaders and gurus of one kind or another who will take us there.
    The reason is not hard to find. Because in those two places the problem of being human is resolved and resolved forever.

    But we don’t live in either heaven or utopia. We live in reality. Some do it better than others. And now we’re back to why the White man is hated so much.

    In any event, woe to anyone who attempts to control the most complex civilization in human history without living in reality.

    As we’re beginning to see all around us today, the consequences are immense.

    *Nice euphemism. What a shame they’ve contaminated one of the Western tradition’s most important words. Given their hatred of that tradition it’s rather odd that they still use that word to define themselves. Especially since it suits us far more than it does them. As well it should, since it comes from us.

  13. seth cohecidence
    seth cohecidence says:

    I did not read the article.

    You good folks know Jussie is a jew, right?
    In that [wiki states] his dad is an east euro Jew.

Comments are closed.