Warring on Whiteness: Stale Pale Males vs Vibrant Varicolored Vixens

Chutzpah is a Yiddish word meaning brazen effrontery or impudence. You could say that someone who displays chutzpah is spitting in the face of morality and logic. Appropriately enough, the very word sounds like an expectoration: the ch is pronounced as in German “Bach,” or Scottish “loch,” and the u as in English “sugar.”

“Pity the Poor Jews”

Chutzpah comes in many forms and has many practitioners. In “Power to the Perverts,” I described Jonathan Yaniv, a “trans-identified” Canadian who sued sixteen women for refusing “to wax his balls.” Now that’s chutzpah. The journalist Mark Steyn is another Canadian and another practitioner of chutzpah. He has just got his violin out for a heart-rending rendition of his old favourite song “Pity the Poor Jews.” According to him, there are “Two-Mile Tailbacks at Jew-Hate Junction”:

As Laura Rosen Cohen likes to say, everyone meets at Jew-Hate Junction: excitable young Mohammedans, secular polytechnic Euro-lefties, anti-globalist conspiracy theorists. … Young Muslims do not like Jews: that is a simple fact, and it’s a waste of everybody’s time denying it. Where Muslims predominate, Jews vanish — as in Molenbeek, across the canal from downtown Brussels. …

Ethnic Continentals, on the other hand, do not like Muslims, and they see where this is headed, and it’s easy to blame Jews. The logic is not difficult: ’Tween-wars Europeans would never have entertained for a moment the construction of mosques in every corner of their countries. But then the Holocaust happened, and “nationalism” got blamed, and mass immigration was instituted as a form of penance, and in one of history’s blacker jests the principal beneficiary of Holocaust guilt was Islam. So, in the newest variant of the oldest hatred, Jews get hated for the Islamization of Europe. (Two-Mile Tailbacks at Jew-Hate Junction, SteynOnline, 6th March 2019)

Steyn goes on to discuss the “Jew hate” of Ilhan Omar, the “savvy Somali” Congresswoman who is a rising star of the Democratic party in America. He condemns the Democratic “House Leadership” for failing to put Omar in her place and defend America’s beleaguered Jews: “Like Corbyn in London, it [the House Leadership] can no longer even insist on its anti-Semitic bona fides without weaseling and equivocating.”

Innocent victims of Islamization

When Mark Steyn condemns someone for “weaseling and equivocating,” you should pay attention. He knows what he’s talking about, because he himself is an expert practitioner of those essential political arts. His article about “Jew hate” is replete with them. Take his assertion that “mass immigration was instituted [in Europe] as a form of penance [for the Holocaust]” — exactly the sort of off-the-cuff explanation that has a certain surface plausibility that will pass scrutiny in the mainstream media but completely fail any serious attempt at getting to the roots of what actually happened. Why did Steyn say “was instituted,” using the passive voice? Well, Steyn himself is “weaseling,” because he wants to avoid the questions of precisely who “instituted” mass immigration as penance for the Holocaust and precisely how Jews reacted to this penance.

The answers to those questions are not at all helpful for Steyn’s portrayal of Jews as innocent victims of the “Islamization of Europe.” For example, why does Britain have so many of Ilhan Omar’s fellow Somalis? It’s thanks to the Jewish Islamophile Barbara Roche, the Labour immigration minister who “entered politics … to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” (See also Andrew Joyce’s “The SS Empire Windrush: The Jewish Origins of Multicultural Britain.”) As part of Roche’s combat, she granted “more than 200,000” Somalis “exceptional leave to remain” in Britain despite the fact that “most were untrained and would be dependent on welfare.”

“Jews and Muslims are natural allies”

Roche wasn’t doing “penance” for the Holocaust but working to atomize Britain for the benefit of Jews. After all, Dr Richard Stone, Jewish high priest in the martyr-cult of Stephen Lawrence, says that “British Jews and Muslims are natural allies.” This is not a “fringe” or minority view among European and American Jews, but absolutely mainstream. In the New York Times, the Jewish journalist Bari Weiss has shaken her head in disappointment over Ilhan Omar’s missteps:

The particular challenge in the case of Ms. Omar is that she is exactly the kind of politician a vast majority of American Jews, who overwhelmingly vote Democratic and who have long aligned themselves with liberal causes, want to celebrate: Here is a refugee, a mother, a Muslim and a woman of color — the first woman of color to represent Minnesota in Congress. It’s no wonder she has already landed on the cover of Time magazine and in front of Annie Leibovitz’s camera. Who wouldn’t want to cheer her on? … It may be more difficult to call out those who ought to be our friends and political allies, but alas for the Jews, not all anti-Semites carry tiki torches. (Ilhan Omar and the Myth of Jewish Hypnosis, The New York Times, 21st January 2019)

As you can see, Jews in America don’t see mass immigration by Muslims as “penance” for the Holocaust, but as a way of recruiting “friends and political allies.” Jews “want to celebrate” Ilhan Omar because she is the antithesis of the stale pale males who founded and shaped America. She is Black, not White; Muslim, not Christian; female, not male.

In short, mass immigration isn’t “penance” by European Whites, but revenge on European Whites. Barbara Roche and Bari Weiss are goyophobes, or haters of White gentiles, in the same way as Sabrina Rubin Erdely, the Jewish journalist who created the hate-hoax about “gang-rape on broken glass” among “the toned, tanned and overwhelmingly blond students” of the University of Virginia.

Snarling in triumph

That gang-rape hate-hoax ran in Rolling Stone, the hipster magazine published and co-founded by the Jewish homosexual Jann Wenner (born 1946). The magazine paid millions in damages to some of those it defamed in the hoax, but its goyophobia is as strong as ever. Rolling Stone didn’t simply “want to celebrate” Ilhan Omar, but actually and unequivocally did so by placing her on its cover for March 2019:

Vibrant varicolored vixens: Ilhan Omar and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Rolling Stone #1323

Omar appeared on the cover with the senior Congresswomen Nancy Pelosi and Jahana Hayes, and with another new and vibrant Congresswoman, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who has claimed “Jewish roots that span back 500 years to the Spanish Inquisition.” It’s interesting to compare the facial expressions of the older and newer generations of female Democrat. Pelosi and Hayes are smiling moderately, but Omar and Ocasio-Cortez are almost snarling in triumph. Their canine teeth are fully exposed and their nostrils are raised. Their message for their older colleagues seems to be: “We’re the future, you’re the past!”

A message for core America

And their message for what Steve Sailer calls “core America”? I’d say it’s this: “We’re coming for you, Whitey!” No wonder Bari Weiss is so disappointed in Ilhan Omar. Why hasn’t this “Muslim” and “woman of color” embraced Jews as her “friends and political allies” against White Christians? You can see the same Jewish belief in Muslims as “friends and political allies” back across the Atlantic in Britain. The Jewish Chronicle has repeatedly run headlines like “Jewish and Muslim women pledge to work together to combat hate” and “Former CST boss will help Muslim group battle Islamophobia.” The CST is the Community Security Trust, which has been called “The Guardian of Israel” that “doesn’t slumber or sleep” and “the gold standard for … responses to all forms of hate crime.”

The former “CST boss” is called Richard Benson and the “Muslim group” he has been helping since 2014 is called Tell MAMA. The organization was very happy to welcome a Jewish expert on “hate crime” into its hierarchy. As Fiyaz Mughal of Tell MAMA put it: “CST has been the trailblazer in recording hate crime for the Jewish community and has set the benchmark. Richard spent 12 years building CST and his governance, leadership and support will take Tell Mama through its founding stages to a much higher level, and build confidence with the public.” In fact, it’s not “the public” that Tell MAMA want to appeal to, but the politically correct leftist elite. Tell MAMA want to present Muslims as victims of White hate, so their propaganda concentrates on Muslim women rather than Muslim men, who have an embarrassing tendency to commit gang-rape, run child-prostitution rings, and blow themselves up at pop-concerts.

Multiple Muslim murderers

Muslim men also regularly commit horrendous crimes against Muslim women, like the double-murder in Birmingham, the double-murder in Wakefield and the rape-murder in London that I discussed in “Murder and Misogyny.” And it was a Muslim man who drove hundreds of miles from the English city of Bradford to murder a liberal Ahmadi in the Scottish city of Glasgow. Tell MAMA don’t want to talk about any of that, because it reveals the truth: Muslims are predators, not victims, and they present a huge and growing threat to Whites, not vice versa. Under the guidance of Richard Benson and the CST, Tell Mama have been careful to deal in propaganda, not reality. Below you can see a summary of the Tell MAMA Annual Report for 2016. Note the use of left-wing sociological jargon like “gendered” and “intersectional”:

Tell MAMA’s annual report (2016) highlights the gendered nature of anti-Muslim prejudice at a street level and the need to fully understand the intersectional nature of anti-Muslim hatred where race, gender and anti-Muslim prejudice intersect within cases.

Given the impact of anti-Muslim hatred on the mobility of Muslim women and on the personal life choices that they make [rather than Islam itself as the root of Muslim women’s limitations], the impacts are also felt within the family and have implications for integration and social cohesion. Tell MAMA re-enforces the need for greater awareness within police forces about the intersectional and gendered nature of anti-Muslim hatred at a street level and the negative perceptions that it can build within victims and their families, around their place and future in communities. …

Commensurate with our 2015 annual report, 56% of victims in in-person or street-based incidents were females. A majority of perpetrators are male 66%, and where identifiable, 69% of perpetrators for such offences are white males. The language of some perpetrators also had misogynistic overtones, meaning that women were abused for their gender and religious identity. (A Constructed Threat: Identity, Intolerance and the Impact of Anti-Muslim Hatred, Tell MAMA Annual Report, 2016)

George Orwell accurately prophesied the modern surveillance state in Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), but the thought-police of Airstrip One worked on behalf of Big Brother, a virile male “with a heavy black moustache.” The aspiring thought-police of twenty-first-century Britain work on behalf of Little Sister, a victimized female in a hijab. The motto of Orwell’s fictional Britain was “Big Brother Is Watching You.” The motto of real Britain in 2019 is “Little Sister Is Reporting You.” Here is a Tell MAMA propaganda poster with a young Muslim victim in a hijab phoning in details of White hate:

Little Sister Is Reporting You: A Tell MAMA propaganda poster

Note the logo used at the bottom of the poster, where the first “A” of Tell MAMA is turned into the weeping face of a Muslima in a hijab:

Tearful Tell — details from the Tell MAMA poster

There’s a blatant appeal to sentimentality and schmaltz, like the loving-mother-hen-and-chick used as a logo for Kids Company, the hugely wasteful and dishonest children’s “charity” run by the megalomaniac narcissist Camila Batmanghelidjh. As I described in “Hearts of Darkness,” Batmanghelidjh received many millions from the liberal elite by exploiting its thirst to virtue-signal about Black children. Tell MAMA exploit another aspect of this “telescopic philanthropy,” the term invented by Charles Dickens for the liberals of his day. Dickens said that liberals ignored their “own natural duties and obligations” and “swept the horizon with a telescope in search of others.”

However, the sentimentality of Tell MAMA belies a very sinister totalitarianism and hostility towards the White British. That’s why the Jewish Community Security Trust are so willing to work with Tell MAMA. As Dr Richard Stone put it, “British Jews and Muslims are natural allies.” They’re natural allies partly because neither group is in fact British. They live here, but they owe no loyalty to Britain’s White Christian culture, history and traditions. Indeed, they despise these things as much as the Bolsheviks despised the White Christian culture, history and traditions of Mother Russia. The Bolsheviks, led by the part-Jewish Lenin and the fully Jewish Trotsky, Zinoviev and Kamenev, overthrew Christianity in Russia and created a mass-murdering police state. Many Western communists, a disproportionate number of them Jewish, watched with envy and admiration, and sought to create revolutions of their own.

New troops for Marxism

But the Leninism that was so successful in backward Tsarist Russia failed to work in advanced industrial democracies like Britain and the United States. That’s why Western Marxists developed new tactics and sought new groups to fight for revolution. In Main Currents of Marxism (1978), the Polish philosopher Leszek Kołakowski (1927–2009) described how his Jewish colleague Herbert Marcuse (1898–1979) developed an “ideology of ‘global revolution’ in which sexual liberation played a prominent part, and in which the working class was rudely displaced … to make way for students, racial minorities, and the lumpenproletariat.”

In modern Britain, students and “racial minorities” are still the powerhouse of the Trotskyist Socialist Workers Party (SWP), which was founded by the Israeli-Jewish Yigael Gluckstein (1917–2000) under his gentile nom de guerre of Tony Cliff. As I described in “Comrades and Cannibals,” the SWP was badly damaged by a rape scandal in 2014, losing large numbers of members and almost all its prestige. It is now trying to worm its way back to favour and influence through front organizations like Stand Up To Racism (SUTR). Like Tell MAMA, the SWP try to exploit victimhood culture by using images of Muslim women in hijabs. Here’s one example on a leaflet announcing a “National Demonstration” in London on 19th March 2019 at which SJWs will “Stand up to Islamophobia & antisemitism,” proclaim “Refugees welcome” and affirm that “Black lives matter”:

Calling for comrades: A Stand Up to Racism leaflet

Many of those who join the “National Demonstration” will not know that it has been organized by the SWP, a totalitarian Trotskyist cult that wants to set up a communist police-state. But there’s a big clue on the leaflet, where the Muslim woman in a hijab is calling out and gesturing in an interesting way. I think her pose is a clear reference to a famous Bolshevik poster by the “constructivist” designer Alexander Rodchenko (1891–1956):

Calls compared: poses on a Bolshevik poster and the SUTR leaflet

The original poster was an advertisement for LenGiz, a communist publishing company in Leningrad. The woman is shouting Книги!, Knigi!, or “Books,” which are available по всем отраслям знания, “in all branches of knowledge.” That hijab-exploiting image on the SWP/SUTR leaflet isn’t schmaltzy like the weeping hijab-wearer used by Tell MAMA, but it’s an expression of the same anti-White and anti-Western intent. Like the rest of the hostile left, the SWP want Muslims to serve as troops in a war on Whiteness. Even as Muslim terrorism justifies the surveillance state, Muslims are presented as victims by Tell MAMA, which demands ever-harsher laws against “hate.”

The antithesis of White Christian America

And even as so-called anti-Jihadists like Mark Steyn try to pretend that Jews are victims of “Islamization,” the Jewish journalist Bari Weiss proclaims in the New York Times that Ilhan Omar is “exactly the kind of politician a vast majority of American Jews … want to celebrate.” This is because Omar is “a refugee, a mother, a Muslim and a woman of color.” In other words, she’s the antithesis of White Christian America. “Who wouldn’t want to cheer her on?” coos Bari Weiss.

Anyone who supports Western civilization, that’s who. Quite clearly that doesn’t include the “vast majority of American Jews.” Or the “vast majority” of Jews in Britain and Europe, who see Jews and Muslims as “natural allies” against Western civilization. But it’s not chutzpah when leftist Jews behave like that. The chutzpah comes from so-called conservatives like Mark Steyn, who pretend that Jews are the innocent victims of “Islamization” rather than its instigators and supporters.

31 replies
  1. joe six pack
    joe six pack says:

    Steve Sailer has a good post on the ‘Coming anti-Aryan campaign’ where he quotes Bari Weiss’ tweet where she says:
    “This shabbat is called the sabbath of remembrance, in which Jews are asked to remember–and to blot out–the nation of Amalek, infamous for murdering the weakest, most defenseless Israelites. Among Amalek’s modern heirs: The terrorists who gunned down innocents in New Zealand.”
    Sounds like YT is next in line for extermination. ‘blot out-the nation of Amalek’

    Mark Steyn is not perfect but if he were to actually pin the tail on the donkey…he would no longer be on TV. So we take what we can get. And he is reliably humorous and willing to mock the other side.The very fact his name is mentioned here probably means his TV appearances will decline 10%.

    • Johnny Rottenborough
      Johnny Rottenborough says:

      joe six pack—*The very fact [Mark Steyn’s] name is mentioned here probably means his TV appearances will decline 10%*

      With any luck, this refreshingly candid Steyn comment will make it 20 per cent:

      ‘Some of us think an Islamic Europe will be easier for America to deal with than the present Europe of cynical, wily, duplicitous pseudo-allies. But getting there is certain to be messy, and violent.’

    • Rob Bottom
      Rob Bottom says:

      Steyn wouldn’t pin the tail on the donkey as that would involve pricking himself. Do you not realize Mark Steyn is himself Jewish? Did the y in his name really throw you off his trail? Please say it ain’t so, Joe! Kosher conservative pundits like him are nothing but a stain on the political landscape, but sadly “humorous” commentators like him are a dime a dozen.

  2. Franklin Ryckaert
    Franklin Ryckaert says:

    Mark Steyn is a so-called “kosher conservative”, i.e. someone who tries to steer conservatism in White countries into a Jew-friendly direction. That means criticizing Islam and Muslims, but never Israel or Jews. Jews are always victims and never guilty of any wrongdoing. Steyn’s background may be an explanation :

    “…Someone asked me on the radio in Australia, two-thirds into a long, long discussion, about how Jewish I was, and I answered that the last Jewish female in my line was one of my paternal great-grandmothers and that both my grandmothers were Catholic. I then filled in a bit of remaining family background for the two or three Aussies who hadn’t yet expired from total boredom…”

    Source : Carolyne Glick : Mark Steyn – Espying the Jew, 08/28/2006


  3. Carolyn Yeager
    Carolyn Yeager says:

    Since Mr. Langdon denies Mark Steyn’s idea that the “Holocaust” was responsible for such a feeling of European guilt that immigration quotas were loosened resulting in a flood from Muslim countries — I would like to ask Mr. Langdon if he believes that said “Holocaust” actually took place.

    It’s odd how so many speak of the Holocaust (without sneer quotes) but don’t say whether its real to them or just a given in the politically correct universe which they don’t want to disturb too much. Will Mr. Langdon indulge my curiosity?

  4. Scott Burns
    Scott Burns says:

    The article is rightly harsh on Mark Steyn, he is clever enough to know better, but isn’t it better that Steyn contribute on prime time to millions by simply avoiding a truth, rather than have him barred from the MSM by stating the truth about Organised Jewey(OJ)?
    Peter Hitchens fills a similar role in the UK. This is the argument i’d guess you’d receive in private from these two, plus they have to eat, keep their kids out of Hellish comp ‘schools’, ect. Isn’t there a space for this type of person? They do good work on all manner of other issues. I personally am not sure what is right, as it puts a heavier burden on those who will speak truth about OJ.

  5. tito perdue
    tito perdue says:

    The AMERICAN FREEDOM PARTY is hosting a conference June 28-30 at Montgomery Bell State Park in Tennessee. Speakers include Richard Spencer, David Duke, Michael Hill, Tom Sunic, Kevin MacDonald, and others who do not hate white people. See: NationalistSolutions.com

  6. Wally
    Wally says:

    ” Well, Steyn is “weaseling,” because he wants to avoid the questions of precisely who “instituted” mass immigration as penance for the Holocaust and precisely how Jews reacted to this penance.”

    Except that the ‘holocaust’ narrative is one of the dumbest, most easily debunked narratives ever contrived. That is why those who question it are arrested and persecuted. That is why violent, racist, & privileged Jewish supremacists demand censorship. Only lies require censorship.

    The ‘6M Jews, 5M others, & gas chambers’ are scientifically impossible frauds.
    See the ‘holocaust’ scam debunked here: http://codoh.com
    No name calling, level playing field debate here: http://forum.codoh.com

  7. Tom
    Tom says:

    I think the best way to re-legitimize white racialism in western public forums is to steer the narrative away from the caricatures constantly introduced by the anti-white racist elites in our midst. That’s why historical comparisons of the greatness of European civilizations relative to other peoples’ civilizations ultimately backfire and only serve to reinforce the Left’s depiction of whites as loathsome supremacists intent solely upon enslaving or degrading the non-whites of the planet. In my opinion, white racialism should be linked publicly to one thing and one thing only – the preservation and further evolution of the unique European genome by means of a natural selection that can only function adequately in genetic isolation from other discrete human groupings.
    I believe that every European of Latin, Celtic, Slavic, Scandinavian, and Teutonic origin is implicitly proud of his genetic make-up, wants to preserve it, and wishes to see it continue indefinitely. However, those same Europeans do not understand how to say “no” in a proper and respectful manner to the hordes of foreign invaders that will literally overwhelm their genome. My opinion is that the wish and the demand for the mere physical preservation of the discreteness of European biological identity is sufficient reason enough to warrant white racial re-legitimization. Otherwise, it seems to me that Europeans might be doomed to be the the new Neanderthals that will be absorbed into the bloodlines of other more self-interested human groupings and exist solely as an insignificant percentage of their genomes.

    • Elizabeth
      Elizabeth says:

      Trying to put rabid anti-whites off with arguments about our wanting to genetically preserve ourselves will only fan the flames. The elimination of white genetics is precisely the end goal. Arguments about the beauty of Western Civilization only stall them briefly on their quest for a perfect world without whites.

  8. Peter
    Peter says:

    Thank you Tobias Langdon and TOO for another fascinating article. It always fascinates me when those posing and praised for their moral and upstanding views, those who we’re told are trying to make the world a better place, are exposed as phonies and liars. Historian David Irving says propaganda and lying are important components of war and I think in some ways WW II ended in 1945, but in some ways it continued, taking on a new character and the fighting continued and is as contentious today as ever, but without open armed conflict since 1945.

    Whether this is an accurate characterization of themselves or not, Germany’s wartime leaders claimed to be fighting in defense of Germany and all of Europe against the violent Jewish Bolsheviks and their “pathological criminal madness” that aimed to destroy the European peoples. It’s obvious that aim is as important as ever to them. I don’t bring this up to smear the article and tinge it with “NAZISM”. It’s just obvious by his words (to me at least) that Josef Goebbels and other Germans saw clearly what the Jews intentions were 80 years ago already and as Europeans (whites) are now within range of being made extinct as a race, professors, doctorates and other intellectuals from the US and Great Britain are now trying to alert the general population to what is going on while those that are leading the genocide against Europeans (whites) smear those fighting against it as “racists” and “anti-semites”. .


    Mark Steyn appears often on Tucker Carlson Tonight. I’m a fan of Tucker and as some have said, he goes as far as he can on his show. It’s interesting to speculate on what he and others in the mainstream media read when they’re home. The other day Tucker mentioned VDARE. It’s a big step from VDARE to TheOccidentalObserver and I don’t expect to see people in the mainstream to be citing TOO yet, but some of these people could be reading it. When Tucker mentions Israel it’s in a positive way (that is why he’s still working) but one wonders what else might be influencing him and is he being “woken” to the Jews, despite having people like Alan Dershowitz on his show often.

    Wikipedia, which is an awful source for history or many things having to do with Jews can be useful if what Wikipedia reports is done in such a way in support of Jews. It’s bio of Mark Steyn says “He was baptized a Catholic and later confirmed in the Anglican Church;.[3] He has stated that “the last Jewish female in my line was one of my paternal great-grandmothers” and that “both my grandmothers were Catholic”.[4] Steyn’s great-aunt was artist Stella Steyn.” Apparently, with only a little Jewish blood running in his veins, he is still close to the tribe.

    I believe National Socialist Germany’s policy after the racial laws were passed characterized anyone 1/4 Jewish or less as “Aryan”, or German. These people and any Jews that served in the German armed forces in WW I were considered loyal to the state unless they had something else in their background making them suspect (like belonging to the communist party). The Nobel Prize winning physicist Gustav Hertz was 1/4 Jewish, was related to the famous German Jewish physicist Heinrich Hertz and he was a WW I veteran. He stayed in Germany after Hitler came to power and worked in Berlin for Siemens during the war. When the war ended the Soviets recruited him and others (perhaps they didn’t have much choice) to work on their atomic bomb project which achieved success in 1948 when the Soviets exploded their first atomic bomb. .

    • Curmudgeon
      Curmudgeon says:

      The real issue for the NSDAP was who was integrated and who was not integrated. As Hitler purportedly said of his mother’s physician, Bloch “is an Edeljude – a noble Jew. If all Jews were like him, there would be no Jewish question.”
      Similarly, his WWI commander Ernest Hess, also Jewish, was exempt, as were, as Bryan Mark Rigg found out when researching “Hitler’s Jewish Soldiers” thousands of Jews up to the ranks of Admiral and Field Marshal.

  9. ValHalla
    ValHalla says:

    Holocaust? So what? Who cares?

    If there was a such thing, which I very much doubt, it would have been only a logical conclusion to the bolshevik revolution, which was masterminded, operated and, indeed, executed, by The nowadays Thriving minority. Let’s say that they indeed maybe found in front of them something that they had left behind in Russia, where tens of millions of people were killed without mercy.

    I would say that if there ever was such a thing as a Sweet Justice, that would have been it. But I doubt it, I believe the killers of the Bolshevik Revolution never had to pay the price and their offspring is right now thriving.

    It should hurt us all that we have to listen this endless whining day after day, week after week, year after year, when so many millions of innocent people killed by the “revolutionaries” never had justice. If there is one thing missing, it is Justice. So, please, stop bending your knee at this endless whining.

    • Sophie Johnson
      Sophie Johnson says:

      ‘Holocaust? So what? Who cares?’

      Ah … this is music of the high-heroic timbre! Well put indeed, ValHalla. Your decisive sweeping of the table clear of mea-culpa cant is life-enhancing.

      As the child of Hungarian parents who were forced into exile as ‘class aliens’ by the bolshie-jew post- WWII terrorists (‘government’!) disgustingly ensconsed in the fair land of their forebears, merely 20 years after the barbaric, talmudically murderous Bela Kun’s post-WWI jew-reign of terror there, I feel that I can breathe again, having read your very welcome words.

      NO: We do not have to tread carefully (having doffed our caps to the holohoax as if that is the least decency requires!) when we contemplate what happened to the jews during WWI!: Germany slapped them down for their hideously hostile, evil bolshie machinations to catch the German nation in their death trap. Well done the Germans.

    • Peter
      Peter says:

      If you have access to The Occidental Quarterly you can read Dr. Andrew Joyce’s brilliant article “Final Solution: The Fate of the Jews, 1933–49” showing Jews central role in the conflict, not just at high levels, bribing people like Winston Churchill to attack Germany (that others have done), but as commissars and partisans, booby trapping cities so when the Germans entered a building they would be blown up. Germans noticed this happened in cities with high Jewish populations. You can also read how elegantly clad Jewish women ate expensive meals and chocolates at establishments in Warsaw, Poland during the war.

      I care. Most of he claims have been exposed as fraudulent exaggerations or outright lies (making soap and lampshades from human fat and skin respectively) and scholars have worked tirelessly to expose the lies only to be imprisoned and have their books banned by governments around the world. How much more proof is needed to show they are covering up their lies? .

      • Carolyn Yeager
        Carolyn Yeager says:

        Hi Peter,
        It did not take any bribery to get “people like Winston Churchill to attack Germany”. Winnie was part of the ‘War Party’ in Britain from well before WWI, whose goal was to destroy Germany for all time. https://carolynyeager.net/brussels-documents-and-heresy-woodrow-wilson

        That he received money from Jews occurred later after he was already an established Anti-German. It’s wrong to blame the Jews for the sins of the British — and it doesn’t work either, have you noticed?

        • Peter
          Peter says:

          Churchill received a huge donation from the Board of [Jewish] Deputies in 1936 and he was given large donations by other individual Jews to bail him out of financial trouble in the same general time period. I accept David Irving’s explanation. The money was simply given to him and I believe it affected Churchill’s decision making.

          • Carolyn Yeager
            Carolyn Yeager says:

            You always accept David Irving. But what I’m saying is that Churchill was already a devoted anti-German in 1911 when “he suggested that the UK should form an alliance with France and Russia and safeguard the independence of Belgium, the Netherlands, and Denmark in the face of *possible* German expansionism.” (Gilbert, 1991)
            In August 1914, “he oversaw a naval blockade of German North Sea ports to prevent them from transporting food by sea” … actually receiving food shipments, which was the Starvation Blockade that was, in my opinion, a war crime. German babies died and children were terribly malnourished.
            Churchill’s hatred of Germans was such that he didn’t need any help from the Jews. But he got it anyway for being such a good friend of theirs.

      • Sophie Johnson
        Sophie Johnson says:

        Peter, I have found Parts 1 and 2 (of 5) of Dr Joyce’s critique of Cesarani’s Final Solution: The Fate of the Jews, 1933–49. Do you know how I might get hold of the other 3? (You are quite right about the brilliance of this critique: Parts 1 and 2 are more than enough evidence of it.)

  10. tito perdue
    tito perdue says:

    Is it not clear by now that America’s Jews are the prime agents of this grotesque effort to turn our 400-year-old majority into a minority? Jews envy and hate and fear our white majority and have successfully gathered control of the organs of propaganda – the print media, television and Hollywood – to clamor for the demotion of white people. They wish for a heterogeneous and allochthonous dispensation that they believe will make them less conspicuous and thus safer. They know that normal people must eventually grow disgusted with their behavior and racial characteristics. Every society into which they have trespassed learns soon enough to loathe them and to take defensive measures. We, too, have only a brief time in which to take actions that might salvage our inherited culture.

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      This is a useless argument. Whites all good and innocent, Jews bad. Until we start dealing with the White Christians who cooperate with and facilitate Jewish power, we accomplish nothing.
      Stop protecting these Whites from scrutiny and necessary accountability by saying it’s Jews alone. Naming just a few at the top is not enough. Theresa May’s Conservative govt. has started arresting people on the flimsiest reasons like wrong use of gender pronouns (!), as would a Democrat govt. in the U.S. and you are still trying to isolate the Jews.

      • Rerevisionist
        Rerevisionist says:

        Most people still have little idea of the historical importance, and endless malice, of Jews. Part 1 is reversing that ignorance.
        But then part 2 is analysing collaborators, which perhaps will turn out to be easier. Jews could have got nowhere without the effects of bribery, in particular – virtually all politicians are funded by Jews. So are most media ‘stars’, academics, and civil servants. And Jews use divide-and-rule tactics, which ought to be examined, perhaps as chess combinations are analysed.
        Both processes are essential, are they not?

      • tito perdue
        tito perdue says:

        “…..and you are still trying to isolate the Jews.”

        No. We have enough white miscreants to fill the Grand Canyon six times over. Whom do I despise more, Bill Kristol or Hillary Clinton? Hillary actually.

    • Sophie Johnson
      Sophie Johnson says:

      ‘Is it not clear by now …’

      tito perdue (I love this nick!), I wonder if it is clear. My feeling is that we are collectively just too slow to appreciate our situation — much slower, in fact, than were the adult generations of Europe in of the 1930s, and of the US of the 1950s. The latter saw that the Jews were hell bent on imposing their communism on us. And they took decisive action.

      In contrast, look at us! We are tolerating, in some quarters abetting, even their efforts to gender-bend our infants in primary school, and their talking of our impressionable, vulnerable post-adolescents into ‘sex-change’ medication and surgical mutilation. The push in this direction is clearly Jewish. But instead of bringing down our fists hard (basta you perverts!) we just look on, Morlock-like. Has the holocaustianity cult turned us into frightened, quiescent fools?

      One has to admit that we have let ourselves become shackled: We cannot turn up at the pub, or in the town square, and declaim against the Jews’ wrong doings. We cannot, because that would be ‘incitement to racial hatred’, etc., and will get us gaoled. A very fine Brit, Jez Turner, was gaoled precisely for having done this; his twelve years of military service did not protect him against a shabbos-goy judges’ shabby behaviour. And the shabbos goy is ubiquitous. Indeed, does anyone survive and prosper in academia or the legal profession who is not one of those?

      Still, you make excellent points. It is we who are too weak to be galvanised by them.

  11. Charlie
    Charlie says:

    I’m posting in protest of TOO’s policies of censorship

    [Mod. comment: Stupid and otherwise objectionable comments will be “censored,” as you put it. If you don’t like this policy, either stop making stupid comments or find another blog to ornament.]

  12. FreddyWammens lover
    FreddyWammens lover says:

    As a millennial, I am horrified that this statement could even be accepted as a cover up: “But then the Holocaust happened, and “nationalism” got blamed, and mass immigration was instituted as a form of penance”. That’s bad enough. Like collective penance for collective guilt is “OK”? My what you boomers have wrought!

Comments are closed.