Confronting the Judeocracy: The Six Stages of Enlightenment

Anyone who has spent even a short time battling against the Judeocracy has surely experienced the frustration of attempting to persuade a trusted friend or colleague of the gravity of the situation—only to fail.  This is undoubtedly one of the most discouraging and troubling aspects of those who take up the mission for truth and justice.  We repeatedly encounter intelligent and well-read individuals who, we believe, surely must share our sense of concern and outrage.  If they do not, it can only be from lack of knowledge; therefore, a short chat or a targeted reading or two, we think, will do the trick.  The facts are indisputable, and hence it is merely a matter of information.  Once our friends have the requisite facts, they will surely—surely—see things our way.  And yet, time after time, they do not.

Why is this?  What are they thinking?  What is their logic?  How is it that they can fail to be fully convinced of the severity of the Jewish Question?  Or even just be sympathetic to our stance?  Why is it that they occasionally even become outright hostile—not to them, but to us?  How can they be in denial of what is, from a rational and objective standpoint, surely one of the major problems facing civilized humanity?  Undoubtedly this could be the topic of a book-length treatment, and I can only outline a few basic ideas here.  But I think there is some merit in examining the basic categories of response and denial by those confronted, perhaps for the first time in a serious manner, with the Jewish Question and with the many problems of living under de facto Jewish rule.

At its most basic level, the situation is one in which the relative novice is confronted with a difficult, troubling, and potentially catastrophic scenario: profound social corruption by wealthy and powerful Jews.  (I stress the ‘relative’ here; everyone, even the functionally illiterate, has heard something negative about the Jews, likely many negative things.)  It is a ‘bad news’ story of the highest magnitude.  And the last thing many people want in their lives these days is another bad news story.  God knows we’ve had enough troubles in recent years:  political upheaval, riots in the streets, a global pandemic, economic gyrations, unrestrained immigration, environmental decline, opioid crises, surging crime, falling lifespans.  Who needs yet one more disaster heaped upon their plates?  The Jews?  Really?  Are you serious?  And I suppose the Holocaust never happened!  (Hint:  it didn’t—not in the way described.)  What are you, some kind of Nazi?  A White supremacist?  On and on.

Despite all this, many of us persevere.  We realize that public education is one of our primary weapons in the Great Struggle, and we are bound and determined to press ahead and inform as many as possible of the nature of the problem.  Therefore, it is of some use to understand more precisely how people typically respond to our overtures, in order to be more effective in our communication.  After all, we are pursuing a noble cause, and we sincerely want people to be well-informed and, ideally, to join us in our mission.  Apart from our opponents, we genuinely want people to like and appreciate us.  You don’t get very far coming off like a fanatic or a jerk.  I’m quite confident that virtually none of us relish making enemies for the sake of making enemies.  We have no driving urge to be antagonistic or rabble-rousing.  Generally speaking, what we have are facts, experiences, and informed opinions on the Jews; these, combined with a general sense of concern for social welfare, justice, and the state of the world, incline us to undertake unusual, unpopular, but highly valuable actions to educate others, and to articulate possible solutions.  It is the prototypical ‘thankless task,’ and yet we do it all the same.

That said, it is helpful to have a model of how people react to the Jewish Question.  The approach I will outline here derives from another famous model describing how people react to a different crisis situation: death.  In the 1950s and 60s, Swiss (later, American) psychiatrist Elisabeth Kübler-Ross developed a well-known scheme that came to be known as “the five stages of grief.”  When confronted with imminent death, she said, people typically progress through five relatively distinct mental phases:  denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance.  Denial:  “No, this isn’t true, it can’t be happening.  There must be some mistake.”  Anger:  “How could this happen to me?  It’s just not fair!  Someone is to blame.  God, how could you let this happen!”  Bargaining:  “Please, God, get me through this and I promise to do x, y, z.  Or, doc, you have to help me; I’ll do whatever it takes.”  Depression:  “There’s no use, nothing will work.  I’m doomed.  What’s the use of even trying?”  And finally, Acceptance:  “Everyone dies, and I guess my time is up.  So be it.  Time to meet my Maker.”  This schema was first described in her initial book, On Death and Dying (1969).

I’ll not debate the merits or demerits of Kübler-Ross’ theory here.  Some have found it helpful, and others dismiss it as largely irrelevant or at least unsubstantiated.  Still, based only on common sense, I think we can see that there is some insight here, and that many people—perhaps some we have known personally—indeed experience such stages in varying degrees.  Obviously not everyone passes through all five stages, and not necessarily in the prescribed order, but nonetheless, these stages do describe some essential aspects of human response to the looming tragedy of one’s own demise.

Inspired by this model, let me then propose something analogous:  The Six Stages of Enlightenment on the Jewish Question.  I claim no real scientific grounding here, and I have done no exhaustive surveys or interviews.  This is based simply on my own personal experience, over several years, of confronting people—students, family, friends, strangers—on the dangers of the Judeocracy.  My six stages are as follows:

1. Denial
2. Irrelevance
3.  Impotence
4.  Misplaced Anger
5.  Acceptance
6.  Righteous Anger and Action

As with Kübler-Ross’s theory, I do not claim that all people experience all of these stages, nor that they necessarily progress through them in order.  But I do think that many people, when confronted with the data, do experience some or most of these stages.  Let me briefly describe each in turn, and then outline some of the relevant facts that make the case for enlightenment.

DENIAL.  Upon first hearing a serious claim that Jews have outsized and detrimental influence in society, or dominate the ranks of the wealthy, or run the media, or control politics, the usual initial response is denial:  “No they don’t.  That’s ridiculous.  There are no more Jews in power than anyone else.  That’s just an anti-Semitic canard.”  This, even from highly-educated people.  Fortunately, this is an empirical question; an overwhelming Jewish presence can be easily proven, given the relevant data.  Below I offer a concise version of this argument.

IRRELEVANCE.  Once it is shown that Jews are massively over-represented in key sectors of society, the standard reply is that this fact does not matter.  “Ok, there are lots of Jews in media, finance, and politics, but this doesn’t really matter.  People are just people.  There are good ones and there are bad ones.  If Jews hold lots of influential positions, that only means that they worked hard and succeeded.  And anyway, they’re just doing their jobs.  If they didn’t do them, someone else would.”

This seems like a common-sense view, but to make such a claim is to hold an extremely naïve and ill-informed view of the world.  It’s true that most decent people, and especially most Whites, tend to view others as individuals; there are likely evolutionary reasons for this, which I won’t elaborate here, but see Kevin MacDonald’s book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition for a good recent account.  If we judge everyone as basically well-intentioned individuals, then of course, it doesn’t really matter if Jews or any other minority dominates society.  If Jews are disproportionate, then it can only mean that they are that much smarter or industrious than others, and thus they deserve their standing. (Nathan Cofnas is doing his best to make this thesis academically respectable—refuted in several places, most recently by Andrew Joyce).  And if some Jews commit crimes or other unethical actions, we have to judge and punish them individually, on a case-by-case basis.  Or so they say.

The Jewish critic must then respond to this stance with a demonstration that it does matter, that Jewish over-representation has a long-standing and deep-rooted grounding in anti-White and even anti-human actions, and that it is remarkably detrimental to social and human well-being.  This is a longer and more difficult argument to make, but it can be done; again, I outline this case below.

IMPOTENCE.  Once we have shown the deleterious effect of Jewish dominance, the next reply is typically something like this:  “Ok, if Jews have so much power and influence, then you can’t possibly win.  They are just too strong.  So why fight them?  It can only hurt yourself and your family.  Better to just ignore the whole situation and live your life as best you can.”

Certainly this is a pragmatic view, and many otherwise well-intentioned critics adopt this line.  But ultimately it means surrender:  a moral capitulation to a malevolent ruling power.  To yield to evil is itself a great evil.  It is to condemn one’s own future, and that of your children and grandchildren, to a life of increasing brutality and coarseness, of deprivation and suffering, of conflict and war.  No truly concerned person can accept this.  We must confront the situation head-on.  To fight against evil, even in the face of likely defeat, is noble; it actually makes life worth living.  Even if victory is a long way off—and ultimate victory for our side is inevitable, once we understand the history—it is still a fight worth pursuing.  Living in a Judeocracy means that every major aspect of society is affected.  If you have any concerns or causes in this world that you think are worth fighting for—the environment, social justice, education, human rights, health, democracy—then you need to engage in the fight against Jewish rule because it has a negative impact on virtually every other social issue.  To paraphrase Spengler, impotence is cowardice.

MISPLACED ANGER.  At this point, your friend is likely to start getting irritated—with you.  As a typical semi-thoughtful but uncritical television viewer, he has likely absorbed and internalized the conventional pro-Jewish mantra:  Jews are a beleaguered and innocent people who have been unjustly attacked over the centuries, most notably during the Holocaust, and thus we owe them vast amends.  Furthermore, being a typically decent person, he thinks that anyone attacking Jews, or any minorities, is a morally-deficient racist or neo-Nazi—and now, this is you!  For God’s sake, everybody hates a racist!  Even Tucker Carlson hates racists!—as he informs us every night, in his unthinking, dim-witted, and duplicitous manner.  Since you clearly hate Jews, you are now officially a ‘hater.’  And everyone hates a hater—don’t they?

Sensing that he has lost the argument, your friend then launches into either subtle or overt ad hominem attacks against you.  Rational discussion is out the window, and emotion rules the day.  You are now simply a ‘bad person’; no further need to debate with you.  Having demonstrated your incivility and cruel-heartedness, you are either pitied or detested.  Critically, the focus has shifted to you; Jews are suddenly nowhere in sight, even though this was the sole issue at hand.  They are suddenly off the hook.  How convenient; the Jews themselves couldn’t have scripted a better outcome.

Sadly, many people remain stuck in this mode for a long time, perhaps for their entire lives.  They never address the real issue, but continue only to think negatively of you and you alone.  This is a relatively good outcome for them; the social problem is not a multitude of wealthy, powerful, and ethnocentric Jews, but little ol’ you, and perhaps a few of your like-minded hater friends.  It’s much easier, and much less threatening, to deal with you and your “ilk,” rather than a potent, dispersed, malevolent force like world Jewry.

Sometimes, though, and often in surprising ways, there is a shift in attitude.  Your friend becomes curious.  He investigates, he reads, he asks questions.  Slowly, slowly, he comes around to your side.  “You know, I’ve been thinking, and I think you’re on to something.  Those Jews are everywhere, once you learn how to spot them.  No one criticizes them.  No one questions the Holocaust.  No one is even willing to simply name the Jews.  They get away with everything…”  Thus we arrive, with luck, at ACCEPTANCE.  Yes, Jews in fact dominate key sectors of society.  Yes, Jews in fact are the major wire-pullers in politics and business.  Yes, Jews couldn’t care less about human well-being, and they would just as soon cause mass suffering and even death, if it profited them in any way.  The denialism has been overcome.

Once at this phase, it is only a short step to the final stage: RIGHTEOUS ANGER—now against the real enemy—and corresponding ACTION.  Anyone with a conscience, with a sense of moral outrage, and with a larger sense of justice, will be utterly appalled at the situation.  They will now become activist, speaking out, writing, informing others.  They will develop the moral backbone to confront Jewish power and its proxies directly.  Being truly knowledgeable and well-informed, they will make a formidable opponent.  The movement will have taken one more small step forward.  And victory will be one day closer.

Constructing the Case

Given that nearly everyone begins at some level of the ‘denial’ stage, it is worthwhile to offer some specific facts that can help build the case against it.  The goal, again, is to show that Jews are massively disproportionate amongst the wealthy and powerful in society.  This is the core truth from which all the rest proceeds.  Fortunately, as I said, this is an entirely empirical matter.  Basic research will reveal the truth.  Of course, the names vary from nation to nation, and they change constantly over time.  A specific case must be made at a given point in time, and in a specific nation of interest.  Since I am an American, and the data here is extensive, let me briefly review the case in the present-day USA.  Even a cursory overview demonstrates the failure of denial.

We can separately examine four sectors of American society:  politics, academia, finance, and media.  In politics, we have a strong Jewish presence in all three branches of government–Congress, the White House, and the Supreme Court.  Regarding the latter, we currently have 2 Jews among the 9 justices:  Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer.  Until the recent death of Ruth Bader-Ginsburg, the figure was 3 of 9, and if President Obama had had his way late in his final term, it would have been an astonishing 4 of 9, with Merrick Garland.  (We can be sure that any future Biden nominee will be Jewish.)

The current US Congress has 38 Jews among its combined 535 members, with 10 in the Senate and 28 in the House.  This constitutes around 7% of the Congressional total, versus an American Jewish population of some 6 million, or just under 2% of the nation.  Hence Jews are over-represented in Congress by a factor of 3.5, and in the Senate by a factor of 5.  The record high for Jewish representation, incidentally, occurred in the aftermath of the 2008 federal election, when fully 48 Jews held seats in Congress (15 Senate, 33 House).

The Biden administration, like that of Trump, Obama, Bush, and Clinton, has an extensive Jewish presence.  Start with the families of Biden and Kamala Harris.  Remarkably, all three of Biden’s adult children married Jews:  daughter Ashley married Howard Krein, son Hunter married “filmmaker” Melissa Cohen, and now-deceased son Beau married Hallie Olivere.  Correspondingly, three of Biden’s six grandchildren are half-Jews.  Biracial VP Kamala Harris married a Jewish lawyer, Doug Emhoff, back in 2014; thankfully, they have no children.

Biden’s sympathies to the Jews extend, of course, to his highest-level administrative positions.  Of 25 cabinet or cabinet-level positions, eight (32%) are held by Jews:  Tony Blinken, Alejandro Mayorkas, Janet Yellen, Merrick Garland (yes, that Merrick Garland), Ron Klain, Avril Haines (half), Isabel Guzman (half), and Eric Lander.  Other high-ranking Biden Jews include John Kerry (half), Rochelle Walensky of the CDC, Jeff Zients, Wendy Sherman, Gary Gensler of the SEC, David Cohen, “Rachel” Levine, Anne Neuberger, Andy Slavitt, Victoria Nuland, and Roberta Jacobson.  And this is not to mention Judeophilic Gentiles like Jake Sullivan, or Gentiles with Jewish spouses, like Samantha Power.  Below I offer some thoughts about why, exactly, this situation came to be.

What about academia?  Here is one remarkable indication:  It was recently noted that of the eight Ivy League schools—Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, Penn, Brown, Cornell, and Dartmouth—fully seven have Jewish presidents.  In other words, 88% of these elite schools are run by Jews.  We can be sure that this Jewish orientation then extends down into provosts and deans who are disproportionately Jewish, into faculty members who are disproportionately Jewish, and into the very curriculum itself, which undoubtedly caters to liberal-left Jewish interests.

Then consider university faculty more broadly.  In an article published in 2006, Schuster and Finkelstein found that “25% of research university faculty are Jewish, compared to 10% of all faculty.”[1]  An older study by Steinberg[2] found that 17.2 percent of faculty at “high ranking” universities were Jewish.  By a different assessment, Harriett Zuckerman[3] examined just the “elite” scientific and research faculty.  She found the following, by major discipline:

Law                 36% Jewish
Sociology         34% Jewish
Economics       28% Jewish
Physics            26% Jewish
Poli Sci             24% Jewish

What about students?  Experience shows that when Jews constitute more than just a few percent of the student body, they begin to dominate campus life.  As it happens, there are nine major American universities with over 20% Jewish undergrads (in descending order: Brandeis, Tulane, CUNY-Brooklyn, Binghamton, Queens College, George Washington University, Columbia, Boston University, and Washington University-St. Louis).  And there are another 23 major schools with more than 10% Jews (Maryland, American University, Brown, University of Miami, Rutgers, University of Florida, Cornell, Penn, Syracuse, Michigan, New York University, Northwestern, University of Hartford, Wisconsin, Yale, Indiana, UC-Santa Barbara, Duke, University at Albany, Harvard, Cal State-Northridge, Florida State, and USC).  Hence we have 32 major American universities, representing the intellectual elite of the nation, with a hugely disproportionate Jewish presence, top to bottom.  Again, this in a nation of scarcely 2% Jews.

Consider, next, the realm of finance and wealth.  When we run down the list of wealthiest Americans, we find a striking fact:  around half of them are Jews.  Among the top ten, we find five Jews:  Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Larry Ellison, and Michael Bloomberg.  Of the top 50 richest men, at least 27 are Jews, including Steve Ballmer, Michael Dell, Carl Icahn, David Newhouse, Micki Arison, and Stephen Ross.[4]  The combined wealth of these 27 individuals comes to roughly $635 billion.  Note: If Jews were proportionately represented among the top 50, there would be one individual; instead, there are 27.

More broadly, we can infer that this “50% rule” holds throughout much of the wealth hierarchy.  In support, we may cite Benjamin Ginsberg, who wrote, “Today, though barely 2% of the [American] nation’s population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews.”[5]  At present, there are something like 615 American billionaires, which implies around 300 Jewish billionaires.

Or perhaps the figures are even worse than we suspect.  A recent study of the most malicious “vulture” capitalists showed a heavy preponderance of Jewish names, far more than half.  And one ranking from a few years ago of the richest hedge fund managers in the US listed 32 individuals by name; of these, at least 24 (75%) are Jews.  It seems that the more we look, the worse it gets.

Even more impressively, consider total private wealth.  In 2018, the total assets of all private households in the US hit $100 trillion for the first time ever.  The 50% rule suggests that the 6 million or so American Jews own or control, in total, some $50 trillion.  This works out to an average of $8 million for every Jewish man, woman, and child—a truly astonishing figure.

So much for Jewish wealth.  More importantly, these various sectors are deeply interconnected.  Jewish wealth is directly related to Jewish political influence.  Take, for example, Joe Biden’s top political donors.  It turns out, unsurprisingly, that the vast majority of Biden’s political donations came from Jewish billionaires.  As Andrew Joyce writes, “of [his] top 22 donors, at least 18 are Jews,” followed by the list of names.  This is perhaps extreme but not surprising, given that Jews overall provide at least 50% of Democratic political funding, and at least 25% of Republican funds.  These are truly disturbing numbers for anyone who cares about political corruption.  Note that there are literally hundreds of lobby groups, all donating to their favored candidates.  And yet one lobby—the Jewish Lobby—provides 25 to 50%, or more, of major candidate funding.  Imagine if, say, half of your income came from one person, and the other half came from a mix of 200 other individuals; who would you listen to?  The answer is obvious.

Finally, take the media.  Hollywood, as we all know, has long been a Jewish domain—reaching back to its origins in the 1910s and 1920s.  It was constructed by the likes of Carl Laemmle (Universal Pictures), Adolph Zukor, Jesse Lasky, Daniel and Charles Frohman, and Samuel Goldwyn (Paramount), William Fox (Fox Films, later 20th Century Fox), and the four “Warner” Brothers—in reality, the Wonskolaser clan:  Jack, Harry, Albert, and Sam.  They were soon followed by Marcus Loew (MGM), William Paley (CBS), and Harry and Jack Cohn (Columbia), establishing nearly complete Jewish control over the film business.

Today the situation is little changed—and is neither disputed nor even controversial.  A notable story published in the LA Times in 2008 openly proclaimed that “Jews totally run Hollywood”.[6]  It investigated every major studio and found nothing but Jewish bosses.  Today the names have changed, but not the ethnicities.  A recent survey of major executives or owners reveals the following:

20th Century Studios  (S. Asbell)
Paramount  (S. Redstone)
Disney Studies  (A. Bergman, A. Horn)
Warner Bros Studios  (T. Emmerich, A. Sarnoff, R. Kavanaugh)
MGM  (M. De Luca)
Sony Pictures  (T. Rothman, S. Panitch, J. Greenstein)
Lionsgate  (M. Rachesky, J. Feltheimer)
Relativity Media  (D. Robbins)
Millennium Media  (A. Lerner)
The Chernin Group  (P. Chernin)
Amblin Partners  (S. Spielberg)
Participant  (J. Skoll, D. Linde)
Sister  (S. Snider, E. Murdoch)
Spyglass  (G. Barber)
Glickmania  (J. Glickman)

As before, all of these individuals are Jews.[7]  With such dominance, we should scarcely be surprised to find pro-Jewish themes repeatedly appear in film:  from the Holocaust and the ‘evil Nazis,’ to the Arab and Muslim ‘terrorists,’ to the ignorant and corrupt Whites, to support for various socially and ethically degrading behavior such as casual sex, homosexuality, interracial couples and families, recreational drug use, crude materialism, and rampant multiculturalism.  All these themes serve Jewish interests.

The overall media situation is even more telling.  The five largest media conglomerates in the US are:  1) Disney, 2) Warner Media, 3) NBC Universal, 4) Viacom CBS, and 5) Fox Corporation.  A look at their owners, largest shareholders, and top officers is revealing:

  • DisneyRobert Iger, executive chairman; Alan Horn, Chair, Disney Studios; Alan Braverman, exec VP; Peter Rice, chair, Content; Dana Walden, chair, ABC; Lowell Singer, senior VP.
  • WarnerJason Kilar, CEO; David Levy, Pres, Turner Broadcasting; Jeff Zucker, Pres, CNN; Ann Sarnoff, CEO, Warner Pictures; Michael Lynton, chair, Warner Music (Parent company:  AT&TJohn Stankey, CEO).
  • NBC Universal:  Jeff Shell, CEO; Robert Greenblatt, Chair, NBC Entertainment; Bonnie Hammer, Chair, Cable Entertainment; Noah Oppenheim, president, NBC News; Mark Lazarus, Chair, Sports; Ron Meyer, Vice Chair, NBCUniversal  (Parent company:  ComcastBrian Roberts, CEO).
  • Viacom CBS:  An unusual situation:  Viacom is a “public” company but voting stock is 100% owned by Shari Redstone and the heirs of Sumner Redstone.  Leading individuals include David Nevins, CCO; Susan Zirinsky, president, CBS News; David Stapf, president, CBS TV.
  • Fox Corporation:  Similar to Viacom, a public company but 39% of voting stock is owned by Rupert Murdoch and Lachlan Murdoch.

All of these individuals are Jewish, with the possible exception of the Murdochs—although it seems certain that they are at least part-Jewish.[8]  And given the difficulty in ascertaining ethnicity, Jewish influence is certainly greater than shown here.  Hence the above is undoubtedly a conservative estimate.  It furthermore says nothing about the many Jewish underlings who implement day-to-day decisions.  Once again, it’s difficult to convey the degree of dominance here.  These five corporations produce the vast majority of all media consumed in the US, which includes all of the major news outlets and most of the major Hollywood studios.  In fact, Jewish leadership or ownership at the top translates all throughout the organization, to middle-managers, staffers, reporters, television personalities, and editors.  It has a very concrete effect on how the media is produced, what is presented, and what is not presented.  It affects who we see, and who we don’t see.

And it’s not only the so-called liberal media outlets.  The conservative venues also are dominated by Jewish interests—typically, via right-wing or neo-conservative Jews.  Fox News, and its parent corporation Fox, owned and operated by the Murdoch family, is every bit as pro-Jewish and pro-Israel as the liberal outlets.  Fox News anchors disagree vehemently with just about every liberal position, and yet, remarkably, they are fully on-board with all Jewish issues.  They struggle to outdo their peers at CNN and MSNBC in their obeisance to Jewish and Israeli interests.[9]  This, again, is no coincidence.  It is evidence of Jewish domination of American media, across the political spectrum and across all venues.

In addition to the above, various other media are also well-represented by American Jews.  Among newspapers, the New York Times has been Jewish-owned and -managed since Adolph Ochs bought the paper in 1896; the current owner, publisher, and chairman is Arthur G. Sulzberger.  US News and World Report is owned by Mort Zuckerman.  Time magazine is owned by Warner Media, and its current chief editor is Edward Felsenthal.  Advance Publications is a mini media conglomerate entirely owned and operated by the Jewish Newhouse family; it manages a wide array of venues including Conde Nast (Vogue, The New Yorker, GQ, Glamour, Architectural Digest, Vanity Fair, Pitchfork, Wired, and Bon Appetit), Discovery Channel, Lycos, and Redditt.  And in broadcast media, we have National Public Radio (NPR), which has long been a Jewish preserve; its on-air staff is unquestionably more than half Jewish.[10]

I think we can put to rest all thoughts of denialism here.

Is Jewish Dominance Irrelevant?

If we then proceed to stage two, Irrelevance, we must counter the view that Jewish dominance is inconsequential.  Again, from the naïve standpoint, Jews predominating in government, academia, finance, and media seems not to matter.  These Jews are largely invisible as Jews, and their Jewishness is rarely displayed explicitly.  As before, the influence is generally manifest in myriad subtle ways—in which voices and views are presented (and which not presented), which individuals are allowed to speak (and which not allowed), which values are projected as good and positive, which causes are worthy of attention, and so on.

The central issues here are (a) that Jews tend to work collectively, in their own best interests, and (b) that they tend to have little regard for all non-Jews, and they tend to hold particular contempt for White Europeans, who have, historically speaking, proven to be their most formidable opponents.  Jews work tribally, as a pack; they assist each other in attacking and undermining all perceived enemies.  Jews in finance and academic Jews can count on media Jews to give them positive coverage and to downplay or bury any negative stories.  Media Jews will slander an enemy even as finance Jews put the squeeze to that person’s employer.  It can be very effective when multiple actors in a trillion-dollar cabal are arrayed against you.

On occasion, these dominant Jews will indeed fight with each other, as when conservative right-wing Jews spar with their liberal leftwing brethren—such as the recent rift between the rightwing Murdoch Jews and the left-wing ADL Jews, especially Jonathan Greenblatt, over comments by Tucker Carlson.  But this is only an internal dispute about the best way to promote Jewish interests, nothing more.  Much of current political confrontation is mere show; Democratic-Republican squabbles are meaningless when both sides are backed by wealthy Jews.  And Jews across the political spectrum love to use Gentile lackeys like Anderson Cooper, Chris Cuomo, Chris Hayes, Sean Hannity, and yes, Tucker Carlson, to cover for them.  This again serves to obscure the real power structure.

But the fact that powerful Jews work with each other, against all others, is a well-established historical fact that has been well-attested, over the centuries, by some of the West’s most brilliant thinkers.  This topic literally requires a book-length treatment—see my book Eternal Strangers: Critical Views of Jews and Judaism through the Ages (2020), which is the first to fully document the historical record.  It dates back over 2,000 years, at least to remarks by Hecateus of Abdera and Theophrastus circa 300 BC, proceeding to the likes of Cicero, Seneca, Tacitus, Porphyry, Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, Voltaire, Rousseau, Fichte, Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Bakunin, Nietzsche, Mark Twain, H. G. Wells, Heidegger, and chess genius (and half-Jew) Bobby Fischer, among many others.  It is an impressive list.

The criticisms are uniformly blunt and damning.  Jews are “misanthropic and hostile to foreigners,” “the very vilest of mankind,” “look upon all other men as their enemies,” “an accursed race,” “the basest of peoples.”  They are profoundly and deeply different—in a bad way—from the rest of humanity.  Medieval theologians condemned the Jews for their usury and their abuse of Christians and Christianity.  Luther called them “a heavy burden, a plague, a pestilence, a sheer misfortune,” adding that “we are at fault in not slaying them.”  For Voltaire, they “display an irreconcilable hatred against all nations”; for Rousseau, the Jewish race was “always a foreigner amongst other men.”  German philosopher Johann Herder called them “a widely diffused republic of cunning usurers.”  Kant saw them as “a nation of deceivers.”  Schopenhauer was especially blunt:  “scum of humanity—but great master of lies.”  Heidegger captured the situation well in just three words: “planetary master criminals”.[11]

This 2,000-year history of hatred and contempt for the rest of humanity is played out in the present day, though with much stealth and deception.  Jews often work in the background, hidden, out of the limelight; they are, as Hitler said, the “wire-pullers” (Drahtzieher) of contemporary society, using money and power to steer events in their favor.  History tells us that Jews will stoop to anything—the most heinous, the most egregious, the most unethical—to promote their ends.  Even war: there is an equally long and damning history of Jewish involvement in wars, from the Jewish-Roman wars in the first and second centuries to the present-day “war on terror”.[12]  This is not speculation; all these facts are well-attested and well-documented.  We need only do a basic bit of reading, from reputable sources.

The bottom line, of course, is that Jewish over-representation in major sectors of society does matter—it matters very much.  Arguably it is the root cause of virtually all our present-day social problems, all of which have been created or exacerbated by powerful Jews.  We can scarcely imagine what life could be like without their manipulating and malevolent presence.

This brief account of pernicious Jewish influence should help lay to rest the “irrelevance” stage.  But impotence need not be the consequence.  Accept the reality, and turn your anger onto the real targets.  And then act.  Bear in mind:  Every Jewish victory in past centuries has been ephemeral, and has instead been transformed into concrete action against the Hebrews—isolation, ghettoization, incarceration, expulsion, or worse.  And so it will be this time.  Either the Jews themselves will recognize that they are on the brink and voluntarily retreat to their “homeland” in Palestine, or else native peoples around the world will, once again, take action.

The path to enlightenment is hard.  And yet it must be pursued, if humanity is to flourish and prosper.

Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and religion, with a special focus on National Socialism in Germany.  His works include a new translation series of Mein Kampf, and the books Eternal Strangers (2020), The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019), and Debating the Holocaust (4th ed, 2020), all available at  For all his writings, see his personal website

[1] J. Schuster and M. Finkelstein, The American Faculty (2006), p. 66.

[2] S. Steinberg, The Academic Melting Pot (1974), p. 103.

[3] H. Zuckerman, Scientific Elite (1977).

[4] Bloomberg Billionaires Index (2018).

[5] The Fatal Embrace (1993), p. 1.

[6] “How Jewish is Hollywood?” (19 Dec 2008).

[7] Until recently, we could have included the Weinstein Company (aka Lantern Entertainment), but the sex scandal surrounding Harvey Weinstein drove the corporation into bankruptcy in early 2018.

[8] Rupert’s mother, Elisabeth Joy Greene, appears to have been Jewish.  See here, here, and here.  We could also cite Rupert Murdoch’s award from the heavily-Jewish group ADL in 2010, and his son James’ $1 million donation to the same group in 2017.  If the Murdochs are not Jewish, they are in very good graces with them.

[9] Sean Hannity is particularly egregious in this respect.

[10] Current and recent individuals include, at a minimum:  N. Adams, H. Berkes, M. Block, D. Brooks, A. Cheuse, A. Codrescu, K. Coleman, O. Eisenberg, D. Elliott, D. Estrin, S. Fatsis, P. Fessler, C. Flintoff, D. Folkenflik, R. Garfield, T. Gjelten, B. Gladstone, I. Glass, T. Goldman, J. Goldstein, J. Goldstein, R. Goldstein, D. Greene, N. Greenfieldboyce, T. Gross, M. Hirsh, S. Inskeep, I. Jaffe, A. Kahn, C. Kahn, M. Kaste, A. Katz, M. Keleman, D. Kestenbaum, N. King, B. Klein, T. Koppel, A. Kuhn, B. Littlefield, N. King, N. Pearl, P. Sagal, M. Schaub, A. Shapiro, J. Shapiro, W. Shortz, R. Siegel, A. Silverman, S. Simon, A. Spiegel, S. Stamberg, R. Stein, L. Sydell, D. Temple-Raston, N. Totenberg, G. Warner, D. Welna, L. Wertheimer, D. Wessel, E. Westervelt, B. Wolf, and D. Zwerdling.

[11] For an enlightening list of some 50 such quotations, see the website of Clemens and Blair, LLC publishing (here).

[12] See my book The Jewish Hand in the World Wars (2019).

69 replies
  1. Crush Limbraw
    Crush Limbraw says:

    Without question, this is the most comprehensive report I have read in some time and fully empathize with the author’s frustration in trying to inform friends and family. It will be archived.
    Furthermore, I would like to connect some dots which might increase our understanding as to what is going on.
    Almost a month ago, I posted this in DaLimbraw Library: “In essence…it always was…and still is…a War on Christ!” – – it’s a long read when you follow all the embedded links, but they clearly point out the empirical evidence from history and the Bible itself.
    A couple of hints:
    1 – Judaism is NOT Old Testament religion – Jesus made that clear.
    2 – Apostle Paul, a converted Jewish Pharisee who wrote much of the NT had one major enemy which he wrote about constantly – who was that enemy?
    Those two revelations were like someone removing blinders from my eyes – talk about connecting dots! Prove it yourself.
    Last but not least, I thank the author for connecting some more dots – truly a work of much labor and inspiration – I’m sure!

      • Crush Limbraw
        Crush Limbraw says:

        Thanks for the link. I read it and it confirms what I have discovered over the last 15 – 20 years: “What I find curious is that the writings of many of the authors I often cite have very insightful observations – and then stop investigating further as if there was nothing further to discover! Why?”
        Dr. Dalton proves much of his case against current Jewish rule by empirical evidence – and then proceeds to evaluate Christianity without considering empirical evidence. What is that mysterious force which closes his eyes to it, as he proceeds to make his case against Christianity from only Jewish sources?
        If you would have taken the time to read all of the sources which I provided in the one link, you might have discovered this yourself.
        We ALL see through the glass DARKLY! Given the subject – some more than others – but few can coherently wrap up all of them. I don’t claim all knowledge, but I can see limitations in both others and myself.
        Discovering truth is a process – not an end state!

        • John Lash
          John Lash says:

          I agree that truth-seeing is a process. One of the best techniques is conversation, rational, open, respectful and evidence-based.
          I don’t get what you mean by “to evaluate christianity without empirical evidence.” Empirical evidence of what? Perhaps you intend something like historical evidence of the great achievements attributed to christianity like the gothic cathedrals, for instance, and certain works of literature. Really I don’t see where you are point there. However I sense this platform may not the right place to discuss that issue. Anyway, I appreciate your response.

          • Crush Limbraw
            Crush Limbraw says:

            Interestingly, your references to empirical evidence are right on target, but barely scratch the surface. Since we both agree that we’re involved in a process and not end state beliefs, what say we continue the process?
            My purpose on the net was never to build my presence as a debater – neither the time nor the interest.
            In the end of things ‘every tub sits on its own bottom’, meaning only we ourselves can decide to learn by research and investigation – and that is what I explain at my website which is separate from DaLimbraw Library – both are interlinked.
            Biblical ignorance is the dominant religion of Western Civilization, both in and out of Churchianity – that is fact. Been there – done that!
            Only a personal pursuit of DaTruth will eventually convince the person himself of the facts of his pursuit – and that never stops.
            I am not trying to convince you or anyone else – only you or anyone else can do that.
            The Bible is clear from Genesis to Revelation as to what happens to any nation who tries to play God.
            Contrary to most Churchians, the end of USA is NOT the end of the world.
            A remnant ALWAYS restores God’s prevailing plan of Dominion and its ascent. It’s not a mystery, except for those who don’t read the Bible or clip out what they don’t like.
            We all see through the glass darkly – but that does not preclude us from seeing if we’re willing.
            Augustine: “Faith comes by hearing, but understanding comes from knowledge and knowledge comes by sight!”
            History is knowledge gained by sight.

        • RockaBoatus
          RockaBoatus says:

          Well said. I too have read Thomas Dalton’s arguments and they are sorely lacking in my opinion. They are persuasive if you know little of the Scriptures nor of liberal historical criticism of the Old and New Testaments.

          Most race realists who are opposed to Christianity use outdated higher-critical arguments against the veracity of the New Testament (e.g., pagan derivation theory, source criticism, alleged contradictions in the gospels, including the Graf-Welhausen theory of the OT, and the list goes on). They are not aware or haven’t bothered to check the careful and assiduous rebuttals of conservative biblical scholars of a past era (Robert Dick Wilson, James G, Machen, Oswald Allis) including those of more recent scholars (Craig Blomberg, Gleason Archer, D.A. Carson, F.F. Bruce). They rightly reject Jews and their subversive ways, but then make the mistake of having total contempt for the Bible, and engage in strange theories of its origins.

          Interestingly, Jesus, the gospel writers, and Paul himself spoke of the Jews in the most damning of ways. They didn’t criticize Jews simply because they were ethnic Jews, but because of their blatant hypocrisy and shameful ways. It was an undeniable historic pattern. It’s no wonder why Talmudic Jews for centuries have declared the New Testament as ‘vitriolic’ and as filled with ‘anti-Semitic hate.’ The New Testament’s correct assessment of the Jews has been one of many reasons why I have remained a Christian, and why I have no ethical conflict with exposing Jewish moral and cultural subversion while still professing a Christian faith.

          Finally, the Old Testament prophets themselves condemned the Jews with the most forceful expressions. Their overt contempt for the sins of their own wayward people might make one assume that it too is ‘anti-Semitic,’ yet this is the type of mindset expressed in the New Testament by Jesus and the apostles. Jews rarely if ever discern this, but it only serves to show how disconnected they are from their own Hebrew Scriptures and how they have been duped by Talmudic Judaism.

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            I agree. There is no stronger ally against the Jews than Christianity, properly understood. Most churches today are apostate, but not all. The people who diss Christianity don’t understand it.

          • Saxon
            Saxon says:

            Until you understand Jews create their enemies to define themselves and justify their actions, you’ll never understand anything. I have no doubt those passages were useful to Jews.

            The “anti-semitism” in a few passages was the impetus for the resulting hatred of all Europeans by Jews. Who suffered the greater losses under Christianity? Europeans, yet the Jewish narrative is they alone were persecuted in Europe by Christians. Christianity literally destroyed the native culture, indigenous beliefs of Europeans and went on a 2K year campaign of murdering Europeans in the name of a “loving and peaceful god.” They destroyed sacred sites, burned woman as witches, went on genocidal rampages to destroy Gnostics and Cathars. Then they have the audacity to claim Europe was better because of Christianity.

            Even today, these garbage religions are wrecking the planet, destroying indigenous people and beliefs. Christianity is the Crook, Islam the Flail and Judaism finances it. Judaism is a crime syndicate masquerading as a religion while making claims of being victims. Nobody on the planet has such a supremacist ideology like the Jewish idea of being chosen by god. They are pious in public, it’s an act to further their goals.

            Jews never show any empathy of remorse for the 80-100 million people who were killed during WW2. They are only concerned with their highly questionable 6 million number. This is likely because they value themselves above all others and only they suffer. They got to the world to view Germans as savages and now all Europeans are being targeted by their machinations. Europeans around the world are the new Germans. Every western institution is being attacked by immigration and diversity.

    • John Lash
      John Lash says:

      Pauline christianity is controlled opposition. See Ben Klassen, The White Mans Bible (1981). Apologetics claiming that the “teachings of Jesus”, Pauline doctrines and “Old Testament religion” (the genuine article) are somehow exemplary of a true and humane message that must be extracted from talmudic judaism are deluded and work insidiously against the struggle to overcome jewish influence.

  2. James Bowery
    James Bowery says:

    Up to “Action”, this is a good ansatz as far as it goes. dealing, as it does, with what might be called the psychopathology of the supremacist theocracy’s pseudomoral zeitgeist. It really is a clinical problem best dealt with by psychiatry; but then we know who sets the bounds on that medical practice.

    As of “Action” we’re in different territory and, indeed, we’ve skipped a critical stage that must come prior to action in what the military calls the OODA Loop:

    Observe, Orient, Decide, Act

    Obviously if you are psychologically damaged, you can’t even Observe what is going on. Perception is cut off. The Emperor Has Clothes. Getting people to even Observe what is going on is accomplished by your first four stages. Observation begins with Acceptance. This then clears the psychophysiology for Orientation which is defined by Boyd as:

    …the repository of our genetic heritage, cultural tradition, and previous experiences—is the most important part of the O-O-D-A loop since it shapes the way we observe, the way we decide, the way we act.

    In other words, your “orientation” is your very identity. Up until Orientation you are best thought of as being Possessed by the supremacist theocracy or, to use a Dawkins term, “an extended phenotype” of what I call Blob — a literal organism that has hijacked your genetic interest.

    Now, here’s something key in understanding the OODA loop:

    The formal theory of universal intelligence has two formal components:

    1) Algorithmic Information Theory (AIT)
    2) Sequential Decision Theory (SDT)

    AIT is about “is”: what we often call “science” in that is value-free observation and modeling of our observations by maximally, and losslessly, compressing those observations as data.

    SDT is about “ought”: what we often call “technology” in that it places values on various predicted outcomes of our actions based on what “is” as informed by AIT.

    In the pure SDT, “Decision” and “Action” are one and the same due to the interiorization of motor control: It is assumed that when you, for example, “decide” to move your arm that your arm moves because both are interior to your being as an individual with integrity (redundant phrase). In organizations, however, Action becomes its own discipline: Interiorizing many components that may not naturally “act as one” so that a decision is carried out with fidelity. That’s military command and control during war including the continuation of war by other means known as “political action”.

    • TJ
      TJ says:

      re: talk show host Ira Fistell [KABC Los Angeles]
      most memorable words:

      The essence of Tribe Mentality. Outright attack on science and objectivity. It seems impossible. Which group is more ludicrous? Remember soupy sales with his words of wisdumb?

      mr. fistell got into an injury accident just before going on the air. he tried to tell the cops that his wife was the real driver. . .lost his job. . .

      • ChilledBee
        ChilledBee says:

        I was absolutely stunned reading the case involving Ira Fistell – and even more stunned to see the outcome. He fled the scene of an accident where a 16-year-old girl died. He did not call the police or the paramedics and instead hopped into a cab to go to his studios. He also had his wife go to the scene in a cab and say she was driving the car, not her husband. This was without a doubt a felonious crime.
        However, Municipal Judge Elva Soper ruled that Fistell, 53, and his wife, Tonda, 54, should be charged with misdemeanors rather than felonies, saying their sentences would probably be the same either way if they are convicted.

        Neither of these wretches did jail time and were given probation. I wonder if Judge Soper knew them.

  3. Tim Folke
    Tim Folke says:

    I hope everyone reads this article slowly and carefully – it is worthwhile! Thank you , Dr. Dalton.

    May I add a couple of observations. First, in talking to others on the subject of the JQ, it is important we give a good impression of ourselves – good grooming, clean yards, clean language, friendly outlook, good sense of humor, etc… People DO judge a book by its cover!

    Secondly, it has been my experience that it is not the thinking liberals (no, that is not an oxymoron) who are the most difficult to cure of socio-historical blindness – it is the Christian Fundamentalists. This group – more than any other – is the single greatest protector of the Jews. Accordingly, unless one is well versed in the Bible as well as the muddy waters of overt Judeophilia embraced by Mainstream Christians, it is best just to leave the Mainstreamers to those who can deal with them with both knowledge and patience.

    Sometimes the best approach is indirect – by voicing opposition to pornography, a corrupt economy, mistreatment of animals, and so on. From there it is but a short walk to the real subject.

  4. SS
    SS says:

    White activism is about to become a criminal offence, Already white activist are hounded, deplatformed, lose their bank accounts and paypal. And the Jews brag about THEIR actions.

  5. Some White Guy
    Some White Guy says:

    Interesting article. I can certainly see myself and others at various points in the stages over time.

    However, something is missing, which is the realization that all these people you are trying to reach are living completely inside the anti-white narrative created by the very influential people you are writing about and which influence you are trying to get them to notice.

    This is why many find Jason Kohne’s method of Going Free so helpful. If one focuses on getting oneself out of the anti-white narrative and into our own story, we are then much more capable of helping others with the same journey. Once outside of the anti-white narrative it is very easy to see who the culprits are who have created and are maintaining the anti-white narrative.

    Join us at and get the tools needed to step out of the anti-white narrative and protect yourself from the psychological war being waged against us.

  6. Archie Hunter
    Archie Hunter says:


    Come on, comparing getting a certain political opinion / facts to get through to people to dying.

    No this does not seem suspicious. Is the kk like 50 % infiltrators now, what would make this “movement” different? Probably lot’sa writers here just lefties / gays / bisexuals / wiggers (lovers of “music” made by subsaharians) / racemixed (part gypsies, part blacks and so on).

    In fact probably a lot of “leaders” in the movement are infiltrators, so entire parts of it exist with the purpose of getting data on as many people as possible opposing the genocide of WHITES.

    Richard Spencer is a kinda commie. The NJP is a version graphically (the logo) of some german party started by the British to get info on German nationalists and racists and the are nazbol aka nationalist socialist commies and the leader looks like he may be a bit jewish. The Base, come on thats the name of a antifa bookstore in Brooklyn. Nazzaro is also a government contractor and anti terrorism expert concentrating on creating false scenarios to catch dissidents and has a company specialised on this. I think he’s Obama’s guy. Harold Covington died the same day he was ging to meet nazzaro, a coincidence or was he taken out. And Harold Covington may have been a hostage of the state in some way that then tried or partially managed to brake free (just a theory based on his own litterature), and thus may have started to be seen as a real threat by the state.

    It’s a mess and has been so most likely since wwII or eaqrlier. The focus in warfare and also secret service things has been to some part psyops, creating things which may benefit the state and also infiltration. This is due in part to the chock of wwII (not just the holocaust, though it does contribute).

    Was the order a set up. I don’t think so. But it did put in effect, the movement, Mr. David Lane behind bars for doing nothing and he may have been seen as a real threat to the state. He was insightful and did get quite a few things, but the information brochyres he put together were not great. And probably alot of his best writings was done behind bars, but it seems he did not have children which seems a great loss to the world. But I guess the order’s actions did make his writings a bit more known, but it’s something that could have been achieved by traditional means of getting info out there also. Certainly a victim of the system and probably murdered in prison.

  7. John Bateman
    John Bateman says:

    A satisfying article. Full of facts that everyone should know. However, by the time l got to the third or fourth paragraph l began to suspect that you had lossed track of the purpose of the article: to make the willfully ignorant aware of the extent of Jewish domination of the western world. And it seems that you can’t resist the urge to lump Tucker Carlson in with Anderson Cooper and the rest of the rogues gallery.
    How is that going to work? My self- satisfied friends may be persuaded to watch Tucker, and that might be a start to reopening free speech. However, if he came out with one of his full throated rants about Jews controlling everything, and we’d be confined to the Don Lemons and my despicable national broadcaster, the CBC.
    I thank you for the definitive facts cited in your article. I do think that this fight should also be about the concept of free speech to try to get the iron curtain to censorship opened up a bit.

  8. Coll Doll
    Coll Doll says:

    I appreciate Mr. Dalton’s focus on elite jews. yes, they are running the show and have eclipsed the WASPs in power. Yet, this 10% elite need their rank and file jews for support. So that is a conversation to be had at some point — why rank and file jews align with elites when their affinity should be with others of their class regardless of background.

  9. Cat McGuire
    Cat McGuire says:

    I very much appreciated all the statistics. Good ammo! Two areas of data were missing however:

    1) The level of Rothschild trillionaire wealth, i.e., the Rothschilds and their brethren were multimillionaires before the first Rockefeller mogul was even born.

    2) That Jews now disproportionately dominate the 1% in terms of influence, power, and control. BlackRock, a company whose entire board and most of its C-level executives are Jewish, manages $7 trillion of its own assets and $20+ trillion of other people’s assets, including entire countries.

    According to economist Ellen Brown, beyond the UN, World Bank or IMF, BlackRock was the only institution in a position to demand countries comply with Covid lockdown policies in order to get loans.

    BlackRock now sits like an operating system over the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury. Early on, in Spring 2020, it began looting the Treasury for all its worth.

    At the Great Reset level of the World Economic Forum (WEF), 20% of the 30 trustees are Jews, including Larry Fink, BlackRock’s CEO. If people only had an inkling of the full extent of Jewish power steering the “pandemic” and the WEF New World Order.

    Instead, using a tried and true M.O., knuckleheads like Bill Gates are encouraged to parade around like Masters of the Universe, clueless that if and when the pitchforks ever come out, they’ll all go after the front-facing white guy, while the Jews continue cryptically commandeering the whole show.

  10. David Westerlund
    David Westerlund says:

    “When push comes to shove”, the less wealthy jews will always stick with their ethnic group. Perhaps a greater problem for Whites is the public education system is being dumbed down almost daily. Then getting into college is not on merit, as only “black lives matter”.

  11. Jacobite
    Jacobite says:

    US Jews took the lessons of their Russian brothers to heart. The Bolsheviks couldn’t exterminate the Russian People because they had a large country to keep running. US Jews began importing a new, non-white population to replace the soon-to-disappear Americans.
    I can go along with the author’s analysis until he gets to the final phase — ACTION. As 2,200 years of European history demonstrates, the only effective actions with regard to the Jewish Question are expulsion or extermination. And the record is replete with stories of emperors and kings expelling Jews, only to have to expel them again 20 years later. Today’s Americans must be the softest, most degenerate population in history. Convince one of everything else the writer describes and you’ll still find almost nobody ready to consider mass executions.
    Tanto bono che no vale niente.

  12. don'tproject
    don'tproject says:

    this is all good, but i wonder if some of these people simply can’t conceive of having enemies – to them the whole world is just “friends they haven’t met yet” – as an example, when i tried to redpill my aunt about covid, she replied “but why would they lie?”

    ps that kubler-ross is jewey as hell – ticks all the boxes

  13. Doug M.
    Doug M. says:

    I lived in Hollywood for 16 years. I know these people really well, inside and out. I don’t think nation states will rise against them and even if they do and wipe them out in large numbers, their COST BENEFIT outweighs the lives they’ve lost. They factored that in centuries ago. In other words, they aquire more generational wealth in relation to lives lost, so they are ALWAYS WINNING. Have this in mind! This is very important to remember and that is, every hundred years or so they crash the system so their bankers repo more assets and grow bigger and since you won’t hear about this in history books they keep repeating it. It’s a worked out routine they go through. Every century or so they go on a massive land-grab that they just pass on to next generations. Once in a while natives massacre them, but as I said earlier their NET BENEFIT and COST BENEFIT outweighs any life lost as “they” destroy/rewrite history in their favor and just repeat and repeat until all the life has been sucked out dry. So no, it may appear stupid what they are doing and self defeating but it’s actually very smart. From the perspective of their own culture/group thinking it’s actually very clever.

  14. Toop
    Toop says:

    Some other facts about Jewish power, who runs social media? Which is how most people use the internet.

    – Facebook / Instagram: Mark Zuckerberg

    – google/youtube/Blogspot – Eric Schmit, Larry Page, Sergey Brin, Susan Wojcicki, Jared Cohen (CEO of jigsaw dedicated to fighting “extremism”)

    – Twitter: Advised by the ADL (see their page on the trust and safety council)

    Reddit – CEO and founder (Steve Huffman) who is a partner of the ADL

    Amazon- CEO is Jewish (Andy jassy)

    Yelp – Jeremy Stoppelman, who are apparently developing a “racist alert” to bully businesses.

    dating apps/sites:
    tinder: made by the jews Mateen and Rad
    bumble: made by whitney herd, who is a prominent partner for ADL
    IAC (and match group): Which run most of other dating sites is extremely Jewish, look at their board of directors

    Most of them rely on Poynter’s “fact-checking” service, which is principally funded by Craig Newmark (Craig of Craigslist), a philanthropist for the ADL.

    • k-meleon
      k-meleon says:

      I’ve also heard that the commenting and chat systems Disqus and Chatango are owned by jews as well

      would be good if people could collaborate on compiling this information, maybe a small wiki

  15. Eric
    Eric says:

    In modern times, only one Western people has come to see the Jews as enough of a problem to try to expel them from positions of influence and from the nation as a whole: I am speaking of Germany from 1918 to 1945. How did that happen? Once we have the answer to that question, we’ll have the answer to getting Americans and other Westerners to see the Jews for what they are — a subversive tribe that does great damage to the host nation and its people.

    What made the German people hostile to the Jews or at least unwilling to defend them? I believe it was what the Jews did in World War I. It was commonly believed (and rightly so) that they had stabbed Germany in the back. In order to get a homeland in Palestine, international Jews agreed to get the United States to join Britain in the war against Germany.

    This was seen as especially outrageous, because up until that point Germany had been more hospitable to the Jews than any other European nation.

    So the Germans felt betrayed. And this was a betrayal that injured the entire nation. It was therefore more significant than, say, the Jewish-led communist revolutions in Berlin and Munich. Many Germans were drawn to communism and socialism, so the Jewish leadership of communism was not a universal affront to the German people. But the “stab in the back” was.

    Time heals all wounds, but I believe, even now, that if Americans knew about the Jewish fingerprints all over 9/11, they might react against Jews the way the Germans did after World War I.

    Apart from that, I’m afraid we will have to wait for some other catastrophic event to open people’s eyes.

    I generally do not recommend trying to enlighten friends and relatives — much less acquaintances — on the JQ. If they were interested in the truth, they would have found out for themselves. At the same time, I don’t like to censor myself. So, in any conversation, I’ll make cryptic remarks or engage on minor points.

    One time a Jew was discoursing on Jewish brilliance and achievement. He was saying something along the lines of Western culture owing its greatness to the Jews.

    I said I would concede that Jews have been unsurpassed in two areas of culture: comedy (when it’s not political) and classical music performance (violin, piano, conducting). It shut him up because he was smart enough to know that the biggest names in Western music (composers), art, literature, philosophy, etc., are not Jewish.

    • David Westerlund
      David Westerlund says:

      To ERIC: Does the jew excel in music? I’m 86, pro-jew for the 1st 40. At 16 I had 3rd chair violin in the West Suburban Symphony Orchestra (Chicago). A jew man in his 20’s, maybe 20th chair challenged me for 3rd. The conductor was also jew. I played a selected tune, he played the same. Orchestra had ~60 people. 22 people voted for me. Conductor said “Sorry Dave, you have to go back to 20th chair.” I had enough sense to stand and say “Wait, how many people vote for “JOE”? Joe raised his hand, pokes friend in front of him, and he raises his hand. TWO VOTES for Joe, right? NO, the conductor said “That’s not how we vote in MY orchestra, you have to go back to 20th chair.” At 16, I did not have the “balls” to argue. I also thought others would follow me as I packed up my violin and left. I was too ashamed to tell my parents why also. Today, the only proof I have of playing the violin is my picture in the Chicago Tribune. I have 5 violins, but a mental block due to the jews. At 40 I was still pro-jew due to school/religion. An ex-German Stalingrad survivor worked for me, quietly told me there was another side to the story. I started reading and at ~45 became a holocaust truther with the help of Ernst Zundel’s 28 minute tapes.

      Hitler saw this same problem in Germany, moved the jew out of management situations (like the jew conductor). Today in the USA, we are too dumbed down by the jew power in the U.S.Congress, U.S. media, Federal Reserve banking system, U.S. industry. It is all jew controlled. There are many small pockets of resistance like “The Occidental Observer”, “Institute for Historical Review”, David Duke, Dalton, Mark Weber, Kaminski, etc. but even if all joined together, chances are slim of another opportunity like we had about 1940 with Hitler.

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        Thanks for telling me your experience. I should not have said the Jews are “unsurpassed” in classical music performance (violin, piano, conducting) because — as you point out — Jews favoring their fellow Jews (even when they don’t deserve it) happens in every occupation.

        One thing I noticed a long time ago: a non-Jewish White American is rarely if ever found conducting a major symphony orchestra (or even a minor one). The conductors have to be foreigners, Jews, nonwhites, or some combination of those.

        In fact, if you look at the arts generally speaking — painting, sculpture, musical composition, literature — non-Jewish White Americans are difficult to find.

        This is even becoming true among actors in Hollywood. Jews always ran Hollywood, but most actors and actresses were gentiles. That’s not true anymore.

        Talented non-Jewish Whites have been excluded from artistic occupations in this country. Not because they’re untalented, but because Jews don’t want them. And Jews have the money to impose their will wherever they choose to do so.

        But notice: As Jews have taken them over, the arts have declined. Few people want to listen to modern classical music. The only reason to go to a modern art museum is to wonder why your kids’ paintings aren’t on the wall instead. And who reads contemporary novels and poetry anymore?

        I hope you won’t let the Jews defeat your love for music. Why not form a trio or quartet and play in a church or community center? I play piano myself. It’s not portable, so I have to deal with whatever PSO (piano-shaped-object) is available in any given place. .

    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      Throughout, I have enjoyed your above-average grasp of real WWs History, and your objectivity. Allow me two questions:

      01 A German historian wrote of ca. 2,000 active Red Army troops, of course in civilian clothes, having been injected into the Weimar Republic to bolster their Bolshevik Revolution, in its constituent States of Saxony and Thuringia: covertly commanded by a full General.

      Said historian was unclear as to how and why this endeavor misfired. Could you fill us in ???

      02 In several of my previous comments, I stated, that the US and the rest of Western Civilization can now consider itself to be living, or rather dying, under its very own MORGENTHAU PLAN.

      Are the general aims of M – 1 and now M -2 sufficient to justify my comparison, even after allowing for some insignificant differences ???

      After all, M – 1 called for the comprehensive cultural/political/economic/administrative genocide of the gene-determined ” uniquely war-mongering ” German Volk: aiming to turn it into innumerable, exclusively agrarian-based statelets. Only the then continued menace of a still powerful SU aborted that MORGENTHAU Jr. program. ” Morning-dew ” indeed !

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        I would be surprised if the historian you mentioned is correct. Red Army troops had plenty to do in Russia (fighting the White Army) without bothering with Germany. The Bolshevik Red Army did not defeat the White Army until 1923.

        I agree that today’s Jewish-led genocide of non-Jewish White people in the U.S., Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Britain, Ireland and Europe is an extension of what the Morgenthau Plan did to the Germans from 1945 to 1947. I’m glad you made that connection.

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          Red Army troops had plenty to do in Russia (fighting the White Army) without bothering with Germany.

          Lenin’s actual priorities were rather different from what you evidently think they were, Eric.

          In an attempt to unite his own revolutionary state with the similar bloody tyrannies that Jewish communists were establishing in Germany—you’ve heard of Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht, surely?—Lenin dispatched an army to subdue, first, Poland and then every other post-Versailles ruined sector of central Europe between Russia/Ukraine and Germany. Neither Lenin nor his formidable army’s commander, General Tukhachevsky, however, counted on hitting a brick wall bearing the name Józef Piłsudski.

          That Piłsudski’s name and the phrase “miracle on the Vistula” are not known to and venerated by every white child in the Western world is a telling indicator of the attention the Jews pay to rewriting history and dictating what and how much we are permitted to know.

          • Charles Frey
            Charles Frey says:

            Lenin and Trotsky were also obliged to fight the British and French Allied Legions. Churchill was engaged at the Murmansk front, which made his later condoned Operation Keelhaul even more traitorous.

            2.5 millions of ca. 5 millions and Vlassov paid for their opposition to the Bolsheviks with their lives, because that bastard couldn’t cover his own liquor bills.

            What is your opinion of equating their growing and accelerating full-spectrum assault with the MORGENTHAU PLAN ?

          • Eric
            Eric says:

            Thanks for that information. Did the Red Army (2,000 troops in civilian clothes) participate in the attempted Red Revolution in Germany?

            I knew about Liebknecht and Luxemburg — also Eisner and Levine in Bavaria, and Kun in Hungary.

            Communism was an international movement going all the way back to Karl Marx. America had its own communists — the two “Emmas” (Goldman and Lazarus, of “give me your wretched refuse” fame).

            Communists (“anarchists”) were active throughout the last half of the nineteenth century and early part of the twentieth. Much of their activity consisted of bombings and assassinations. European royalty were the main target.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:


            As we both know, the Morgenthau Plan was, for its time, an uncharacteristically plainspoken expression of the Jews’ hatred for a sizable segment of the world’s Christians, a hatred that was already then more than nineteen hundred years old. Thus, I think that your choice of that plan as the emblematic basis of today’s even more open, more encompassing attack is extraordinarily apt.

            The Jews are clearly aiming to reduce the entirety of the “legacy populations” of North America, Europe, and Oceania to a position of permanent humiliated servitude, one where even the possibility of resistance or rebellion will have been permanently scotched.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      I would concede that Jews have been unsurpassed in two areas of culture: comedy (when it’s not political) and classical music performance (violin, piano, conducting).

      David Westerlund is right, Eric. Jews are not preeminent in music; they simply monopolize the publicity apparatus.

      This is not to deny the genuine distinction, even greatness, of a number—a proportionate number—of Jewish instrumentalists and conductors from, say, 1875 to 1975, especially among Jewish musicians who were born or were trained in the Austro-German tradition. But for every towering Bruno Walter or Rudolf Serkin or Budapest String Quartet, there were three to five Steinbergs, Leinsdorfs, Maazels, Horensteins, and Lenny Bernsteins: mediocrities promoted by their Tribal cousins as profound interpreters.

      As for comedy, the pantheon certainly enshrines Jack Benny and Carl Reiner and, from Hollywood, maybe, just maybe, Billy Wilder and (Code-era) Ernst Lubitsch. But surely Benny is the sole Jew worthy of comparison with the Christian Stan Freberg when it comes to comedy’s bottom line: getting people to laugh.

      • Al Ross
        Al Ross says:

        PC, Bernstein was a pop composer . His basic melodies surely cannot be compared with those of Classical composers.

        My music doctorate – holding wife met him at a Composers ‘ conference in Sapporo many years ago.

        Prior my wife’s departure for Japan , I’d informed her that ” this guy composed West Side Story ” ,
        “Oh that ? Simple music for simple people “.

        • David Westerlund
          David Westerlund says:

          To Occidental Observer:
          I’m amazed at all the comments you received on this subject and all high quality. For $$, why don’t you hold a conference and invite all these people. Face to face, one on one. What an experience.

          I went to David Duke’s 70th birthday party Jul. 2020, Many good speakers, but mingling with the other 49 people (spamdemic allowed only 50) was great. The host charged $700.oo/per person plus hotel, but certainly worth the $$.

          There were NO protesters at the hotel, which surprised me. It was in a small town just east of the Mississippi. Medford, OR might work for you????

        • Pierre de Craon
          Pierre de Craon says:

          Al: Yes, of course Bernstein was a pop composer, albeit an able one, at least through the composition of West Side Story. But I was referring to him specifically as a conductor, the occupation that made him a star and kept him a star. It was as such that I included him with the other oversold mediocrities of the podium I named.

          I might add that, largely thanks to the fact that I worked at Lincoln Center for more than twenty-five years, I was able to attend a great many performances given by all the people I mentioned, the only exceptions being Horenstein, whose appearances in New York during the time that his life and mine overlapped were very, very few in number, and Bruno Walter, whose last public appearance in New York came several months before I attended my first concert at Carnegie Hall. In other words, my experience of the people I refer to is decidedly first hand.

          • Al Ross
            Al Ross says:

            You are perfectly correct , P de C.

            However , being a renowned conductor interpreting other people’s compositions does not confer the same artistic self – satisfaction as content creation, if you will permit me a blinding flash of the obvious.

          • Pierre de Craon
            Pierre de Craon says:

            Indeed, Al. Putting aside for the moment the matter of LB’s Jewishness and how much he profited from it, it was always plain that his failure to compose music that would endure soured his satisfaction in his success, perhaps even his amour-propre.

            Somewhat off topic, may I add, simply speaking as someone who encountered LB in corridors and hallways more times than can be recollected, that whatever else he was, he was an invariably friendly and sweet-tempered guy, certainly when it came to interacting with “little people”—of whom I was (and remain!) decidedly one. He also was a brilliant psychologist in rehearsals, at least for the purposes of getting the best out of the overwhelmingly neurotic and spoiled-brat segments of the New York Philharmonic—but those are tales for another day.

      • Eric
        Eric says:

        I’ve already conceded that even greater goy talents have probably been lost to us because of Jewish nepotism.

        But music performance and comedy are nevertheless two fields — culture-wise — in which Jews HAVE distinguished themselves (credit where due).

        As Mencken noted, they have not done so well as painters, sculptors, composers, poets, novelists or philosophers. They have only taken the “second prizes” at best.

        Of course, they are a small group. So I don’t put them down for this. But I won’t let their incessant bragging go unanswered.

        It’s one thing to say your people are talented. Quite another to say our entire Western civilization wouldn’t amount to much without Jews.

        That’s almost as ridiculous as blacks saying, “We wuz kangs wen you wat debils wuz livin in caves!”

    • Bernard Mullins
      Bernard Mullins says:

      Loved your previous analysis….disagree with you today. First of all, with your smarts you could easily convince the people close to you regarding the JQ. In fact, my own rule is that I speak truth to friends and family…..but not to co-workers or anyone outside my circle.
      As the author stated in this excellent piece….people go through stages…..I’ve seen it….I have a friend that initially fought back very hard….tried to shut me up…..then as time has gone by he said, “You know, I was working and busy so I didn’t have the time to look into what you said. But now that I have more time, I see that you were right.”
      I say, speak the truth and that’s the best you can do.

  16. crank
    crank says:

    For what its worth, it was (finally) accepting the common ethnicity of the neocon suspects in the 9/11 crimes that flipped the switch for me.
    Also worth mentioning is the role of writers born into Jewish families : Atzmon, Shamir, Shahak, Cole, Unz. These people made it ‘acceptable’ for a conditioned liberal like me (as was) to even consider the concept of Jewish power.
    As has been said many times, once one notices the disproportionality, and realises that Jews by and large do not think like European gentiles with regard to tribalism and universalism, then all research tends to lead in one direction.
    It is not contested knowledge, just tainted, taboo. It all reduces to: the courage of truth versus the cowardice of willful ignorance.

    • Pierre de Craon
      Pierre de Craon says:

      What a relief to learn that Diaspora Jews have no power or only a trifling amount, and shame on my lying eyes for telling me otherwise for so long!

    • SS
      SS says:

      Israel did give them a base for their evil war-mongering. But they had plenty of power to do their genocides in the diaspora and they did.

  17. Junghans
    Junghans says:

    Some great comments and insights regarding Dalton’s great article here so far. Perhaps he might consider researching a book about human parasitism??

      • Junghans
        Junghans says:

        Yes, I’ve read it. His book may have been well intended, but it is poorly researched and written. It inadvertently
        discredits what should have been a damning thesis. Mullins essentially comes across as a “crank anti-semite” in most of his books, with the exception of his early book on Ezra Pound, This Difficult Individual.

        • SS
          SS says:

          Mullins seemed interesting, but how did he know all this stuff? Then I saw he was talking about nephilim. 🙁

    • Brian Hemingway
      Brian Hemingway says:

      Kevin Macdonald’s trilogy covers the topic quite well.
      “The Culture of Critique” is actually the study of a predator parasite.

      • Junghans
        Junghans says:

        Correct you are, The Culture of Critique is a monumental book on the predations of Jewry. However, the definitive book on parasitism per se, has yet to be written.

  18. anonym
    anonym says:

    Great article. I think it´s mostly a matter of courage and integrity. (Or a really bad personal situation, or old age, when you have nothing left to lose.) Anyone with half a brain can see what´s going on, and the only thing keeping most europeans silent and humiliated is fear. Fear of losing friends, family, social status and income. It will simply solve itself when things get worse, as it always has.

    The main problem with the Jews, as it seems to me, is Jewish plagiarism. Everything european in origin becomes replaced with a Jewish counterfeited copy. Copies that are complete opposites to the original, but through shifty salesmanship is sold as the genuine article.

    Today´s political landscape is a clear example. “Conservatives” who tear down the institutions, and reduce all values (love, honor, dignity, decency) to crass cash value. Sold in the name of “freedom”. “Socialists” who advocate for a huge underclass of exploited brown people, declining wages and a destroyed working/middle class. “Liberals” who actively censor, oppress and shun people from society for disagreeing with them.

    Judaism itself is nothing but a huge collection of plagiarisms (babylonian, egyptian, persian, greek and roman myths and beliefs distorted into a bizarre Jewish copy.) Some Jews (like Paulus) rebelled and made a new counterfeit religion: Christianity. Based on the greek mysteries (chiefly Dionysos), but where everything mystic and spiritual is forbidden and “demonic”. It was spread among the illiterate in Rome and gave us a millennia of bizarre misery. (Alienation from nature, fear, superstition etc etc.)

    The same can be seen anywhere Jews try to play europeans. Science (string theory, artificial intelligence), law (from ethics to a lying contest), art (from Rembrandt to a bucket of shit), music (from Bach to atonal noise) etc. etc.

    The underlying reason, perhaps, is a form of “spiritual autism”. Unable to sense and feel God and the divine order of nature, they are “free” to make up anything. And since they envy us they make imitations that fundamentally lack the essence of the european originals.

    • Thomas Dalton
      Thomas Dalton says:

      Excellent observation. Jewish culture is a counterfeit culture, stolen and debased. Every product of Jewish capitalism is a cheap imitation, designed for maximum profit. It has to go.

        • David R. Westerlund
          David R. Westerlund says:

          To Jack Manson (& all): Please go back to my personal (1st hand) experience with violin. This is how jews excel. I have read (which is hearsay), Einstein was autistic, so maybe he excelled in one narrow subject, but that his wife (non-jew) was his brain force. jews do excel in lies, bad manners and low morals.

  19. Olivia
    Olivia says:

    Listen, if you want to point out Jewish power, please note that the money is printed by them. They have this power because they control the money. Take the money back and you strip them of their power. Until all peoples wake up and nationalize their central banks and take ownership of those shares now held by Rothschild et al, you will keep crying. I don’t want to see another Jewish power piece until someone has the decency to say: they have this power because they control CAPITAL. NOT a communist plot. They control all of capitalism including now China. So don’t write another piece without this. Repeat repeat repeat until the thick goyim start thinking about controlling their money to control their destiny.

    As for Jesus, didn’t exist. Did it not occur to any of you to actually follow the literary and archeological record showing NO JC!? The reason for Christianity is however JEWISH in origin. To put down the Jews, a Jewish messiah had to be appropriated because that was the religion of the Judeans (actually not “Jews”, but Judeans). So all you Christians worship a piece of Roman propaganda meant to contain the Judeans. This is why “Jews” reject Christianity. Ironically, this mind control program ended up enslaving the entire West. But the judaic character of this Roman mind control program cannot be denied.

  20. SS
    SS says:

    Nick Fuentes, he who tried to figure out how long it would take to bake six million cookies with so many ovens, says he has been put on the no fly list. Couldn’t make it to his advertised conference in Florida.

    • Junghans
      Junghans says:

      That’s right, as we descend deeper into Jewry’s clutches, their rule by tyranny gets uglier as the velvet veil of “democratic” pretense reveals a deadly levantine iron fist.

Comments are closed.