Jewish Loot and Neglected Fruit: How the Mainstream Right Serves Jews and Betrays Whites

“Low-hanging fruit!” cry deluded right-wingers all over the West. “Why doesn’t my favored party on the mainstream right pluck that fruit and defeat the left?” Well, they’ve been crying that for decades and will still be crying it when the left pack them off to a slave-labor camp or an organic gas-chamber. Some of those right-wingers are too stupid to see the truth; some are too frightened to admit it. Their favored party on the mainstream right doesn’t pluck the low-hanging fruit because it doesn’t want to defeat the left. And it doesn’t want to defeat the left because it is the left. That is, it’s financed and controlled by Jews who support the left and its anti-White, anti-Christian, anti-Western agenda.

The lies and delusions of perverts

Take the question of transgenderism. In 2021 Boris Johnson, British prime minister and leader of the so-called Conservative party, was presented with some low-hanging fruit — ripe, delicious, and trembling on its stalk. Johnson was asked to affirm that “only women have a cervix” after his supposed opponent, the Labour leader Keir Starmer, had said that this simple statement of biological fact was “transphobic.” According to Starmer, “it is not right” and “should not be said.”

The Goy Grovel: Sajid Javid, Priti Patel and Boris Johnson betraying Whites and serving Jews

If Johnson had wanted to stand up for “conservative values,” defeat the left, and rally millions of ordinary Whites to his party, he would have said that, yes, of course only women have a cervix and that the Labour party are pandering to the lies and delusions of perverted and mentally ill men. But Johnson didn’t say that. He’s a cuckservative and he cucked. If he’d spoken the truth about transgenderism, he would have pleased ordinary Whites. But he would have angered Jews. As Kenneth Vinther pointed out in his review of Scott Howard’s The Transgender-Industrial Complex (2020) at Counter Currents, transgenderism is a thoroughly kosher campaign: “at the top of the [transgender] pyramid rests a series of charming Jewish billionaires like George Soros, Paul Singer, Dan Loeb, Seth Klarman, Jennifer Pritzker, David Gelbaum, Andrew Shechtel, Sheldon Adelson, Loren Schecter, Martine Rothblatt, David T. Rubin, and Mark Hyman, to name a few.”

Take the fight to Labour!

Now take the question of racism. A typically deluded right-winger called Patrick O’Flynn has recently complained in the cuckservative Spectator about “renewed lurches into race-baiting by Labour.” He condemns Labour for demanding “a posthumous royal pardon of those who took part in an anti-slavery uprising in Guyana in 1823” and for blaming “health inequalities” and the poverty of Black-headed households on racism.

O’Flynn rightly says that all this inflated anti-racist rhetoric “will be hated” by the working-class White voters who have switched allegiance from Labour to the Conservatives. Labour’s claims “ought to be meat and drink to a competent Conservative party.” After all, he says, a “cabinet in which the Home Secretary, Chancellor, Health Secretary, Education Secretary, Business Secretary and several others are from non-white backgrounds should be taking the fight to Labour about its unfair characterisation of modern Britain.”

“Anti-racist” means “anti-white”

O’Flynn points out the obvious: “Now would be the perfect time for some of these ministers to step forward and make the case that Britain is one of the least racist countries in the world and a place that should be aspiring to a post-racial politics rather than buying into Labour’s relentless grievance-mongering.” But alas, none of those non-White ministers has stepped forward to defend Britain, so O’Flynn concludes his article on a puzzled and despondent note. Despite the low-hanging fruit waiting to plucked by the multi-hued hands of that admirably vibrant cabinet, Labour’s racial rhetoric has “gone pretty much unanswered.” O’Flynn can’t bring himself to admit the truth, you see. The Tories don’t want to defeat the left’s rhetoric on racism, let alone attack the anti-White ideology central to the concept of racism.

That’s because the Tories accept the anti-White ideology themselves and proudly proclaim themselves to be an anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-homophobic party. As the Jewish Conservative Tom Tugendhat has said: “Anti-Semitism sits alongside racism, anti-Islam, homophobia, and sexism as a cretinous and divisive belief that has no place in our public life and particularly not in government.” O’Flynn doesn’t mention at the Spectator that the Pakistani Muslim Sajid Javid, one of those non-White ministers in the Tory government, did indeed recently “step forward” in response to leftist hysteria about racism. In fact, he stepped forward not once but twice. And what did Sajid Javid do after he stepped forward? He heartily agreed with the left, first about the need to stamp out racism by White sportsmen and second about the need to punish a White comedian called Jimmy Carr for a good joke about Gypsies: “When people talk about the Holocaust they talk about the tragedy of six million lives being lost to the Nazi war machine, but they never mention the thousands of Gypsies killed by the Nazis, because no one wants to talk about the positives.”

Diligently kissing Jewish backsides

In between those two anti-White interventions, Sajid Javid found time in his busy schedule to extend “early Chanukah greetings” to Britain’s tiny but very powerful Jewish community. Javid knows which side his bagel is buttered. He wants to be prime minister and that’s why he has been diligently kissing Jewish backsides ever since he entered politics.  Being anti-White is part of being pro-Jewish. The same is true of Priti Patel, the high-testosterone Indian Hindu fem-pol who was fired as a minister by Theresa May for having secret meetings with Israeli officials under the supervision of the little-known but very powerful Jew Stuart Polak, a former chairman of Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI). Theresa May didn’t object to Patel being a shabbos-shiksa, agent of Israel and cringing step’n’fetchit for Britain’s Jews. After all, May was all those things herself. No, she objected to Patel being a clumsy shabbos-shiksa and bringing Jewish control of British politics to public attention. But Patel didn’t spend long out of high office. When the part-Jewish Boris Johnson became prime minister, he appointed Patel Home Secretary and she’s now overseeing a harshening of Britain’s already draconian laws against “hate speech.”

She’s also been revealed as an obnoxious bully of her White staff. That’s poetic justice, because White officials at the Home Office are heavily leftist and have been imposing ethnic enrichment on ordinary Whites for many years. Now they’ve experienced for themselves a little — very little — of the misery inflicted by non-Whites. All the same, if rules on ministerial conduct had been followed, Patel would have been fired for the second time. But obnoxious behavior towards Whites doesn’t count. Patel performs the goy-grovel before Jews and that does count. She’s still in her post, still obeying Jewish orders, and still declining to “step forward” and defend Britain from the left’s anti-racist (and anti-White) hysteria. Rishi Sunak, the Indian Hindu Chancellor in the Tory cabinet, has also declined to step forward and bat for Britain. He’s much more intelligent than Patel, which isn’t difficult to be, and he’s a former employee of Goldman Sachs, which is exactly what you would expect him to be (Richard Sharp, his Jewish overseer at Goldman Sachs, became “the BBC’s third Jewish chairman” in 2021).

The logic of looting

At least, Sunak’s earlier work for Goldman Sachs is exactly what we haters at the Occidental Observer would expect. Sunak has been placed at the top of British politics to serve Jewish interests, not the interests of Whites. But his work for the great “vampire squid” went unremarked in another of Patrick O’Flynn’s deluded articles at the Spectator. O’Flynn was complaining that Sunak hasn’t plucked yet more low-hanging fruit. The policies Sunak is pursuing don’t help the former Labour-supporting Whites who switched to the Conservatives. Their hard work isn’t being rewarded and Sunak is deliberately pushing them down the social scale. As O’Flynn says:

Think about how this must feel to workers on roughly median earnings. Two decades ago they earned two-and-a-half times as much as minimum wage workers. Now they earn less than twice as much. By 2024, Sunak has decreed that minimum wage workers in entry level roles will be earning two-thirds of the amount that median earners do. This will represent a massive compression of wages within a single generation.

For those working people who put in a lot of effort in their schooldays compared to their more idle classmates, or who perhaps underwent apprenticeships on very low earnings at the start of their careers, this is highly unlikely to feel like progress. … Sunak has no parallel policy of ensuring that median earnings catch up as a proportion of the top 10 or 1 per cent of earners. In other words, his approach defies logic. Those in the modest middle of the pay scale have every reason to feel victimised. (Does Rishi Sunak really understand red wall voters?, [“red-wall voters” = traditionally Labour-supporting Whites who switched to the Tories], The Spectator, 13th November 2021)

O’Flynn is wrong. Sunak’s approach doesn’t defy logic. It’s perfectly logical for an alumnus of Goldman Sachs to continue serving plutocratic Jews, not ordinary Whites. Sunak is there to help mega-rich Jews get richer, not to defend Britain against their looting. Of course, you can’t expect O’Flynn to mention Jews in a cuckservative magazine like the Spectator. But he could at least have mentioned Sunak’s connections to Goldman Sachs and drawn the obvious conclusion. I suspect he was scared to bring an obviously Jewish bank into the argument. After all, look at what happened to the great conservative philosopher Roger Scruton when the left whipped up a hysteria about a speech he had once made in Hungary. He had criticized George Soros and said, with perfect truth, that “Many of the Budapest intelligentsia are Jewish, and form part of the extensive networks around the Soros empire.” Scruton was denounced as an “anti-Semite” by Luciana Berger, the very Jewish Member of Parliament for a very non-Jewish constituency in Liverpool.

Blind to the truth

As I described in “A Philosopher Falls,” Scruton’s response was typically cuckservative. He should have denounced Berger for her dishonesty and turned the blowtorch of his mighty intellect on the flimsy and regularly misused concept of “anti-Semitism.” He didn’t. Instead, he indignantly denied that he was an anti-Semite, thereby accepting the validity of the charge and merely rejecting its application in his particular case.

That is not how a great philosopher should behave. But then I don’t think Scruton was a great philosopher or an effective defender of Western civilization. To defend something, you have to recognize who its enemies are. Then you expose and oppose them. Jews are the central enemies of Western civilization, but far too many self-proclaimed defenders of the West are still blind to the enemy within the gates. Thanks to their blindness, they are betrayed by the Jew-controlled right again and again. When they stop being blind, they’ll stop being betrayed, because they’ll stop supporting the Jew-controlled right.

35 replies
  1. Karl Haemers
    Karl Haemers says:

    This is focused on British issues, but it is the same in the US. For all those newcomers and others here on Based Truth who are Conservative Republican voters, and who are wondering what is wrong with the Republican Party in the US, let this essay explain. Short answer:

    “Their favored party on the mainstream right doesn’t pluck the low-hanging fruit because it doesn’t want to defeat the left. And it doesn’t want to defeat the left because it is the left. That is, it’s financed and controlled by Jews who support the left and its anti-White, anti-Christian, anti-Western agenda.”

    “…they are betrayed by the Jew-controlled right again and again. When they stop being blind, they’ll stop being betrayed, because they’ll stop supporting the Jew-controlled right.”

    “They” are any of us who still hold out hope for the conventional right-wing Conservative Republican party in the US. Most likely that is why new-comers are here: they understand something is wrong with the right today, and are looking for true America First prospects. It’s time we all know the Republican America First is in fact Israel and Jews First. We here at Based Truth are truly America First, and that means Jews out.

    Abbott in TX, DeSantis in Fla, Noem in S Dakota, Trump (former), even Bolsonaro (former) in Brazil—all philo-semites and Israel and Jews First. These are examples of the phony right-wing people who are under the control of Jews.

    We must detach from control by Jewish power to become truly America First. The Conservative Republican party has no hope of it at the Federal level. Perhaps locally, but even here Jewish power dominates. The best growing possibility I know of is the National Justice Party, but even it is slow and cautious. The National Party in Ireland is promising, and cautious of naming Jews. Leader Justin Barrett calls it “International Finance Capital”.

    If we have to use euphemisms for now. so be it. That very fact discloses Jewish power. The traditional Republican party has been infiltrated and turned, and it now works for the enemy just as readily as the Neo-Communist Jewish left.

    This is one of our main functions as a true America First group here at Based Truth and other groups: build awareness of the race-traitorous Republican party, and offer a safe place to learn and build awareness of true white Nationalist power.

  2. USA Invades Israel
    USA Invades Israel says:

    This article exemplifies an un-written point which necessitates mention explicitly.

    Jews organize, gain access to and speak *directly* to power.

    What is stopping Whites from doing this in order to preserve their own interests?

    • RockaBoatus
      RockaBoatus says:

      I’d say it’s a combination of things, but most likely fear of being called names such ‘racist’ and ‘anti-Semite’. There is also the fear of losing one’s job, as well as losing family and friends who will place you on the level of hate incarnate – Hitler! If you’re someone in a prominent position, your fall is likely going to be a hard one.

      One also has to understand that most people are just sheep. They just want to get along with others and go about their lives unopposed. They don’t want to think too much. They want comfort, ease, and money.

      To possess the kind of knowledge and mindset that we at TOO have is rare indeed. We are the oddballs in our society, and there are not enough of us to make any significant change. We are akin to trying to warn the apathetic Eloi about the Morlocks who want to kill them (per the 1960s movie ‘The Time Machine’).

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” What is stopping Whites from doing this in order to preserve their own interests? ”

      The jewmasterss have no intention of letting Whites
      “organize, gain access to and speak *directly* to [ the Jews in ] power.”

    • Lord Shang
      Lord Shang says:

      The white man has idiotically allowed himself to be conquered. That’s all it is, at bottom. We are criminally terrorized by the nonwhite underclass below us, and brainwashed (and professionally and financially terrorized) by the Jewish overclass above us. In other words, we are MIDDLE Americans (or “Middle Englishmen”, etc) in control of neither our “streets” (including prisons) nor our institutions – nor even our political (and some would add, religious) consciousness. We are as enslaved as any people who have ever lived, because the bulk of our people are deluded into thinking they are free. So what do we do about it?

      • John Alder
        John Alder says:

        White Man fight ! Build a radical pro White anti jew movement and don’t worry about labels the enemy will put on us. Tell the whole truth and if folks ignore it then they get what they deserve. When push comes to shove our people will look to and demand the radical solution. Trying to sound like republicans or the Rotary Club will get us nowhere! When the house is on fire you call the radical fire department you don’t ask for a moderate with a squirt gun.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        ” So what do we do about it? ”

        Keep on making your superb observations and informing us of them . We need the info to pass on to others at any opportune moment .

      • Angelicus
        Angelicus says:

        Very simple, carry on spreading the message and denouncing their lies. The secret is “never give up”. I believe that everything we can do will be useful in the long run. However, things will get much worse but so be it, after all, most Whites are trash who deserve to be exterminated, we don’t need them. History has always been made by heroic minorities.

        • moneytalks
          moneytalks says:

          …” most Whites are trash who deserve to be exterminated “…

          The chosenhite NWO talmudic financial jewmasterss would probably agree with that .

  3. Angelicus
    Angelicus says:

    Philip Scrutton may have been a good speaker and perhaps a better writer, I remember reading some really fine articles of his about art and “Why Beauty matters”, but deep down he was just a typical conservative, which means a wimp and a moral coward. As Tobias rightly pointed out, he just cringed and cowardly denied being an anti-Semite.

    He NEVER said a word about the ethnic and cultural destruction of the White race in general or the British people in particular, that would have entailed speaking about race and we know how terrified of being considered “racists” most Whites are, especially the “cuckservatives”.

    I would not say or accept that is “blindness” that keeps many Whites or wannabe defenders of the White race and Western civilization from speaking up; it is FEAR. Fear to lose their nice cushy jobs, their “friends”, their “social status”, etc…

    • Junghans
      Junghans says:

      It is known as the Fear of the Jews Syndrome, or F.O.J.
      Stan Rittenhouse even wrote a book about it, surprisingly enough, called Fear of the Jews.

      • John Alder
        John Alder says:

        Instead of trying to reform this rotten system we should focus on building a powerful White people’s movement to replace the corrupt old order.

  4. John Alder
    John Alder says:

    In America we call such types KOSHER CONSERVATIVES because they are in reality anti White and scared to death of being called a racist. It’s been said that todays conservatives defend yesterdays liberal victories. I read where some astute observer remarked : conservatives have never embraced a cause they didn’t end up betraying. Some things never change.

  5. Pilot
    Pilot says:

    Where I live, two of the local “conservative” talk radio shows, are almost indistinguishable from any leftist one.
    Definitely Neo-con with pushing war, going on about how “evil” Russia is, going on about things that happened in Russia during the Soviet regimes, Pushing for war, just like they did under Bush.
    Pro-police, when police have abandoned whites, along with the court system.
    It’s too bad they are just mouthpieces for the Republicans, who care nothing for us.

  6. Kris
    Kris says:

    Don’t read any of this just chant, Da Joos, Da Joos, Da Joos, my limey friend’s number one obsession.

    • charles frey
      charles frey says:

      What a coincidence !

      When an exceedingly capable cancer surgeon told me on a Friday noon, that I had stage four colon cancer, I exclaimed Da Cancer – Da Cancer – Da Cancer !

      After next morning’s five hour, demonstrably successful operation, seven years ago, I exclaimed Da Chemo – Da Chemo – Da Chemo.

      [ factual, but read between the lines ]

      • Pilot
        Pilot says:

        They’ve brainwashed people into thinking that you can’t blame any one group for things. People say, “Well, they aren’t all like that” and other things they’ve been fed.
        They think they are thinking for themselves, but they ignore what mankind has known for thousands of years…that people work in groups. When they point out the good things that one group does, they ignore how they also enslaved us.

  7. Dr ExCathedra
    Dr ExCathedra says:

    Back in my conservative days, I thought, as I had been taught to think, that I had to choose between either Israel and the Jews or the savage Muslim hordes.

    Talk about stupid myopia.

    • Emicho
      Emicho says:

      I don’t think it was stupid. I used to root for the Israelies as well. Of course I did, they were the ones that looked like we do. Same reason most Americans and Westerners of low information who aren’t self-hating leftists root for Israel during their periodic slaughtering of the Palestinians.
      Obviously, you grow up and realise that we are all Palestinian in Jewish eyes, you change your mind.
      But that’s two good things, good natural instincts, and changing your mind. What leftist can claim to do even one of these things in their entire lifetimes?

  8. Emicho
    Emicho says:

    Talking about the controlled opposition cuckservative right, I’ve always enjoyed Mark Steyn, even while being fully aware of exactly what he is.
    He seemed to be on a good wee roll, first pointing out white replacement, then the climate hoax, then full on with Trump, even riding hard admitting the election was stolen when many a cuck fell away.
    I was really surprised the amount he was allowed to get away with. Even Drudge set fire to his reputation to promote covid. Mark stated it’s obvious absurdity from day one.
    I was pleasantly surprised to see him given a prime time show on GBNews, he’s the only person on the network that isn’t a totally obvious fake.
    I don’t really follow British popular culture, but I’m pretty sure Mark isn’t a big name in Britain, he’s more well known in America. Yet he was chosen to do his show and report on the ground from Ukraine?(OK, in the beta-male part of the ‘war-zone’, Lviv, as close to Poland and as far from the front lines as possible, along with all the other brave Westerners)
    Ah, but now I see why. The way he’s straight faced pump insane Western gibberish about Ukraine wrecking the drunk Russian army, has been actually shocking to see.
    It seems these MSM creatures have some sort of deal where they just tell the truth about all the ridiculous fakery of our corrupt systems, build their reputation and get paid. Then if they want to ridicule a big hoax, they must submit to lying about the next big hoax.
    You can totally see how these guys justify such an arrangement to themselves.

  9. Sonia
    Sonia says:

    One problem (besides the American cowards who are afraid of being called anti-Semites) is that the groups who DO speak up against Israel and the Jewish lobby are divided.

    And groups who should be against Israel and its maltreatment of Christians are mostly silent.

    For example, it’s mostly the Left in America that is concerned about Israeli treatment of Palestinians. Most others are really not.

    Many Christians support the Jewish lobby even though that lobby is very socially liberal — favoring abortion, transgenderism, LGBTQI, etc. Even Israel is socially liberal, but pro-Israeli Evangelicals pretend not to see.

    Many Jewish lobby organizations and Israel have been against recognizing the genocide committed by Turkey against Christian Armenians even as Jews make constant demands of Americans because of the Holocaust.

    But most Americans (even those who criticize Jews quite a bit) won’t criticize those organizations and Israel for such genocide hypocrisy, probably due to laziness and lack of knowledge.

    So there we have it: American cowardice, divisions, etc.

  10. TJ
    TJ says:

    This from a local community site:

    At the entrance to the memorial park in Kyiv, there is a sculpture of an extremely thin girl with a very sad look holding a handful of wheat in her hands. Behind her back is the Candle of Remembrance. This monument commemorates the Holodomor.

    What is the Holodomor?
    After the end of the First World War, Ukraine was an independent state, but in 1919 the Soviet Union “sucked” it into the community of Soviet states. The Ukrainians considered themselves a Central European country, like Poland, and not an Eastern European country like Russia. They tried to restore Ukraine’s independence.

    In 1932, not wanting to lose control of Europe’s main source of grain, Stalin took away the grain-producing land from the Ukrainian peasants and also all the grain, creating an artificial famine. The goal was to “teach Ukrainians to be smart” so that they would no longer oppose Moscow. The people who produced the most grain in Europe were left without a crumb of bread.

    The peak of the Holodomor was in the spring of 1933. In Ukraine at that time, 17 people died of hunger every minute, more than 1,000 every hour, and almost 24,500 every day. People were starving to death in the streets.

    Stalin settled Russians into the emptied Ukrainian villages. During the next census, there was a huge shortage of population. Therefore, the Soviet government annulled the census, destroyed the census documents, and the census takers were shot or sent to the gulag, in order to hide the truth.

    Today, 28 countries around the world present the Holodomor as genocide against Ukrainians. You couldn’t learn about in school because almost all evidence was destroyed and victims were covered up for decades. To this day mass graves are being uncovered.

    Books are now being written. Movies are now being made (see Bitter Harvest movie from 2017 starring Max Irons and Barry Pepper:
    The Holodomor at that time broke the Ukrainian resistance, but it made the desire for Ukraine’s independence from Russia eternal.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      …” it made the desire for Ukraine’s independence from Russia eternal. ”

      “The Gulag Archipelago” Nobel Laureate author Solzhenitzyn was emphaticly clear that foreign atheist jewish revolutionary Bolshevik gangsters of the USSR — not Russians — were responsible for the 1930s starving to death several million Ukranians under the despot Stalin . Are they ignorant of that fact about their Holodomor ?

  11. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    IMHO the biggest enemy of the White Man is the USA. I am part Jewish. The Jew side of my family would never tell me some of the abusive things we, sorry they, call the Americans.
    I want to see the White Man survive. The World will be a better place without the fake Jew controlled USA, which cannot last.
    The surviving Whites will probably mainly be the East Europeans of the Jewish Faith who are not related to the real Jews. A few unwanted real Jews will probably survive wending their way into oblivion
    I hope that Israel dies and the Polish shopkeepers go home.
    The article should say that the UK is occupied by the Americans who murdered:
    Gen Zia by nerve gassing his pilot
    Benazir Bhutto with a bomb
    The Shah of Iran with cancer
    Hugo Chavez with cancer
    Gen Galtieri, an Anglophile who did not like Jews, removed by Falklands War
    Gadaffi with a bullet
    The Americans made Iraq attack Kuwait so that they could liberate the latter and replace the British.
    The Americans make the British keep Gibraltar and other places for American use

  12. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    I my previous post I forgot to mention the murder of Saddam Hussein by the Americans.
    A rich Iraqi whose son I was teaching had a cousin who was a general in Iraq.
    I said I could not do much about the Americans, .although I always told my students the truth about them, but why didn’t the Arabs tell the Americans to go to hell. He said that if the Arabs did that, two weeks later there would be 200 of their ships anchored off the coast, 2000 aircraft flying inland and 10,000 Americans marching up the beach.I said ” Surely you mean 10,000 [members of the Black community] marching up the beach?”. He laughed and said ” Of course 10,000 [members of the Black community] marching up the beach” Arabs do not like Africans.
    I said that his people should give their oil to the Americans or get themselves into cities behind anti tank ditches and land mines and when the Americans and their stooges attacked ask for help from the rest of the World and force the Americans to take each city and town by force. He said that a lot of children would die. I said that these are the people who wiped out most of the native Americans. The next time I saw him he said half a million mothers had been forced to sit by the beds of their dying children because the Americans would not allow medicine into the country

  13. It's Me
    It's Me says:

    The German people are not a nation of murderers and monsters! Jewish schizophrenia has worked itself out on us. They have ground us through their psychopathic mill.

  14. It's Me
    It's Me says:

    How can it be that we white peoples completely follow the Jewish guidelines and disregard our own natural way of life in such a way that we are threatened with extinction and are no longer rulers over our own territories?

    • TJ
      TJ says:

      The understanding of “we” is way too elastic, so is understanding of “nation.” Example- is nation defined by biology or by geography? As Peter Brimelow explained “anyone of any race can become American.” I would counter “any White of any race can become American.” But that also requires geography. . .

      Naturalization Act of 1790:

      United States Congress, “An act to establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization” (March 26, 1790).

      Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided within the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen thereof on application to any common law Court of record in any one of the States wherein he shall have resided for the term of one year at least, and making proof to the satisfaction of such Court that he is a person of good character, and taking the oath or affirmation prescribed by law to support the Constitution of the United States, which Oath or Affirmation such Court shall administer, and the Clerk of such Court shall record such Application, and the proceedings thereon; and thereupon such person shall be considered as a Citizen of the United States. And the children of such person so naturalized, dwelling within the United States, being under the age of twenty one years at the time of such naturalization, shall also be considered as citizens of the United States. And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: Provided, that the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States . . .

Comments are closed.