Quasi Crypto-Jews #1 Kenneth Stern: Expert on Hate and Holocaust

Many Jews are in positions of overt power and influence, such as those placed throughout the current Biden Administration, or those on the Board of Trustees of the globalist hub World Economic Forum. They have names with which we are familiar, such as Larry Fink, Anthony Blinken, Rachel/Richard Levine, Merrick Garland, Janet Yellen, Alejandro Mayorkas, Jeff Zients (Chief of Staff for the mentally disabled Biden; he recently replaced Ron Klain), David Rubenstein, Mark Benioff and many others.

Other Jews however are not as prominent, and we are not likely to know their names. Their power and influence may nevertheless be considerable, and so a careful study of their identities and activities may serve to inform our self-defense. These Jews may not be considered Crypto-Jews in the classic sense, since they are not intentionally hiding their Jewish identity, nor particularly self-suppressing their presence as Jews in our society. In a lesser way their lack of prominence can act as a cover for their harmful influence among unsuspecting people. Exposing them can only help our cause.

 Early Influences and Training for an Anti-White “Hate” Expert

One such Jew who has and is wielding considerable influence in key areas is Kenneth Stern. He is the current Director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate, part of the Human Rights Project at Bard College in New York, from which Stern graduated in 1975. Let us examine the extraordinary career trajectory of this Jewish “expert” on hate, extremism, intolerance, anti-Semitism, holocaust denial—with never a focus upon abuses of Jewish power.

Stern graduated with a law degree from the Willamette University College of Law in Oregon in 1979 and immediately became managing director of his law firm, Rose and Stern until 1985. His most notable case during this time was as trial and appellate counsel for Dennis Banks, co-founder of the American Indian Movement. We may suppose Jews supported the American Indian Movement for the same reasons they organized and funded the NAACP, or today’s Black Lives Matter: using racial minorities as cannon fodder against White Christian society. Genuine concern for the struggles of American Indians would be far from Stern’s mind. Other notable cases included defending Portland Oregon’s homeless population against an anti-camping ordinance, and representing plaintiffs Jack and Micky Scott in a $7 million defamation suit against heiress to the William Randolph Hearst media fortune Patricia Hearst. Stern had high-profile cases at the beginning of his career.

Stern was Director of the National Organization Against Terrorism in Brooklyn during 1985–1986. During the period from 1979–1988, during which Stern was Director, all recording of terrorist attacks on Americans stated the perpetrators were “militant Islamic extremists.” This included Israel’s enemies Muammar Qaddafi of Libya, the Lebanese Hezbollah, and Iran. According to the timeline, the Israeli Mossad, Shin Bet and IDF committed no acts of terrorism during this period.

For the next two years Stern was the environmental enforcement counsel of New York City’s Department of Sanitation. Private commercial waste removal in New York City has long been a notorious operation of the Mafia or “Cosa Nostra,” increasingly including the Jewish Mafia. An extensive report addressing such organized crime by the New York State Environmental Conservation Committee was published in 1987, during Stern’s time as counsel to the City’s Sanitation Department.

Stern was a member of the International Association of Jewish Lawyers and Jurists from 1983 to 1988. He married Marjory Slome, a Rabbi, in 1989. Thereafter, Stern’s career as an expert on anti-Semitism, hate and holocaust denial blossomed.

“Hate” and “Anti-Semitism” Expert

From 1989 to 2014 Stern was a specialist on anti-Semitism & extremism of the American Jewish Committee in New York City. He was expert on anti-Semitism, extremism, and hate groups, and was a spokesperson.

The “About Us” section of the New York Chapter of the AJC states:

In advancing the goals of the American Jewish Committee in New York City, the New York Chapter works to support the State of Israel; combat anti-Semitism; and build bridges both within the New York Jewish community and with outside partners, including diplomats, government officials, and leaders of other ethnic and religious communities. Our objective is to promote mutual respect and understanding, as well as advocate for communal and public policies that safeguard the Jewish people and advance the causes of civil rights and social justice.

During this 25-year period of Stern’s advocacy, he testified to Congress, appeared at the White House Conference on Hate Crimes in 1997 during the philo-Semitic Presidency of Bill Clinton, and studied and reported on the “militia movement,” “bigotry” on campus, “hate speech” on radio and internet, and was instrumental in making such concepts familiarized in society.

At the Conference on Hate Crimes, Clinton said “As part of our preparation for the new century, it is time for us to mount an all-out assault on hate crimes, to punish them swiftly and severely.” The Conference attempted to define “hate crime”: “A hate crime is the embodiment of intolerance — an act of violence against a person or property based on the victim’s race, color, gender, national origin, religion, sexual orientation or disability.” While no specific mention is made of Jews, nevertheless “Participants attended a closing reception at the United States Holocaust Museum.”

Stern appeared on Face the Nation, Crossfire, Nightline, Dateline, Good Morning America, CBS Evening News, and National Public Radio, among others. (We must not confuse him with the Ken Stern who worked at National Public Radio from 1999–2008, becoming CEO until ousted in 2008; he appears to be German.) I could find no transcripts or video archives of Stern’s statements on these major media outlets, but we can know his views from other sources.

Author of the “Working Definition of Anti-Semitism”

In 2004 Kenneth Stern was the “lead drafter” of the “working definition of anti-semitism,” according to Stern’s own essay in the Guardian of December 2019. Analysis by Peter Ullrich’s “Expert Opinion On The ‘Working Definition Of Antisemitism’ Of The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance  “reveals severe deficits.” It is “inconsistent, contradictory and formulated very vaguely. It therefore does not satisfy the requirements of a good definition.” Stern’s definition states:

Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.

So, “hatred toward Jews” is anti-Semitism. Or “non-Jewish individuals” too. Vague indeed. An anti-Semite used to mean someone who hated Jews, but Stern has helped make it mean someone whom Jews hate. The greatest criticism of the definition is of the eleven examples that accompany it. Seven of the eleven examples relate to the nation of Israel, criticism of which on a number of key points is to be considered “anti-semitism.” Let us consider all eleven examples:

  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
  • Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

Ample criticism and denunciation of these examples makes it unnecessary for us to denounce them here, except to say Kenneth Stern was central to their formulation and application. Obviously they confer special protective status to certain Jews and all Jews generally, and to the nation of Israel, exonerating it from its ongoing heinous crimes against humanity. The British Labour Party’s refusal to accept the full definition and examples created an immense scandal, and eventually the Labour Party collapsed under its own Semitophobia and adopted the definition. If there was one man responsible for the great furor and fuss that erupted when the new definition was introduced in 2005, it was Kenneth Stern.

Holocaust Promotion, Holocaust Protection

As is evident, two of the examples address that epitome of Jewish suffering and specialness, the holocaust. They amount to “holocaust denial” and accusing Jews of lying about it. Stern acted in vigorous defense of the holocaust when he wrote in the preface to his 1993 book Holocaust Denial (“one of the first to target holocaust denial”):

The history of anti-semitism emblazons one truth above all others: lies that promote Jew-hatred must never be ignored. Holocaust denial, though ridiculed today [1993!], has the attributes to become a potent form of anti-semitism. (p. xi)

It also had the attributes to be a potent form of truth, but Stern has worked to distort and subvert that truth over the decades since Holocaust Denial was published. To Stern, truth is dangerous to Jews, and he is a staunch defender of Jewry. “Holocaust denial is not about historical truth. It is about anti-Jewish hatred as part of a political agenda—and must be confronted as such.” (p. xii) Strategically it is advantageous for Stern and holocaust promoters to steer the debate away from historical truth. Here we may not plunge once again into debate over the veracity of the holocaust story, so to conclude this aspect of Stern’s influence, we will consider why holocaust promoters such as Stern avoid debate:

First, Jews, historians and others of goodwill have to make clear why we will not debate deniers [hint: it is not because they will lose]. Second, we have to expose the disingenuousness of the deniers’ insistence on debate. Professional deniers are not holocaust scholars, but anti-semitic imposters with a neo-Nazi political agenda… (p. 59)   

Essentially, don’t engage in scholarly debate, but dismiss with ad hominem attacks. Of note, Stern’s book release was timed to the opening of the Holocaust Memorial in Washington D.C. Stern says his book is intended to “increase awareness of the Memorial’s lesson: that genocide is always possible if people are complacent about hatred.” (p. xii) At the time Stern was Program Specialist on Anti-Semitism and Extremism at the American Jewish Committee.

International Influence

By 2000 Stern entered into wider prominence internationally through his role as special advisor to the defense in the David Irving v. Penguin Books and Deborah Lipstadt trial. This was the most high profile holocaust case since the Ernst Zundel trial in Canada in 1988, and would supposedly determine not just the truth or falsehood of the holocaust story. And it would also be a landmark case about whether it could even be debated into the future. Irving chose to represent himself without professional counsel, and to his great misfortune (literally bankrupted by the $2 million award against him), and the misfortune of all revisionist historians thereafter, he lost.

Deborah Lipstadt, defendant, went on to become today’s Special Envoy to Monitor and Combat Antisemitism at the U.S. Department of State. Irving continues to publish his magnificent works of history, particularly regarding the Third Reich and National Socialist leaders, but struggles with poverty and marginalization, his speaking events held in virtual secrecy before small committed audiences to avoid violent protests, and infiltrated by monitors to ensure Irving’s self-censorship. Kenneth Stern’s “special advice” to the defendants helped ensure this sad and tragic verdict.

In 2001 Stern was appointed to the United States delegation to the Stockholm International Forum on Combating Intolerance. These forums began in 2000 and went through 2004. The first forum was titled “Education, Remembrance and Research on the Holocaust.” One compelling reason to hold the forums was a Swedish study which showed “that knowledge among young people of the Holocaust was deficient and that a large number of teenagers were not even certain that it had taken place.” The first forum established the general predominance of Jews as the primary victims of “intolerance,” a theme that was realized in a book summarizing all four forums, titled Beyond the ‘Never Agains’. The 2001 forum which Stern attended was titled “Combating Intolerance” and focused on contemporary issues, especially “anti-semitism” in the modern world. This forum .”..aimed to increase collaboration between individuals and organisations at all levels of interaction — local and national, as well as regional and international.” Stern’s influence thus went international.

The 2001 forum, which occurred in late January, many months before 9-11, issued a Declaration with 10 points of commitment. All are worth considering in the context of today’s anti-White, “woke,” multi-racial world, but number 10 will suffice:

As we begin the new Millennium, we offer our support to those affected by and vulnerable to all forms of intolerance. The memory of those killed by violent racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, xenophobia, homophobia and other forms of intolerance will remain vivid in our minds as we make a world where intolerance has no place, where all human beings are respected and equal in dignity, and where all societies are inclusive. In the name of justice, humanity and respect for human dignity we pledge to continue combating all forms of intolerance and to do all we can to bring about a world of inclusive societies speedily in our day.

Whatever contribution Stern had to this commitment statement, it is consistent with Jewish ingroup strategies to create multi-racial societies where Jews can more freely extend Jewish power at the expense of Whites. One wonders if the 2003 forum was canceled because “Neo-con” Jews and Zionists were preparing to launch the war on Iraq on behalf of Israel though fought primarily by the U.S. military. Jewish intolerance of Arab Iraqis killed by violent Zionist racism would violate their commitment to the forum’s #10 statement. “All human beings are respected and equal in dignity,” would still apply to Iraqis lying in pools of blood shredded by U.S. drone strikes instigated by Zionist Jewish “Neo-cons.” So would IDF strikes on helpless Palestinians in their open air prison of Gaza. Thus perhaps it was inauspicious to hold a forum in 2003.

Publications on “Hate” and “Antisemitism” by the “Expert”

By 2006 Stern published Antisemitism Today: How It Is the Same, How It Is Different and How to Fight It. He concludes his Foreward:

This book is an effort, not necessarily to provide the right answers, but more urgently to help ensure that those who care about combating antisemitism are asking intelligent and relevant questions, and not defaulting into comfortable but too often unproved and perhaps ineffective answers. (p. viii)

This book will inevitably provide the wrong answers by asking foolish and irrelevant questions about the supposed psychopathology and reactionaryism of non-Jews, instead of providing proven and effective answers about the predatory, corrupting, impoverishing and damaging behavior of Jews in non-Jewish societies. Never will Stern consider that the primary reason for anti-Semitism is Jewish behavior itself. All efforts to “combat” antisemitism must depict Jews as innocent victims, and non-Jews as maniacal irrational haters. This—taking a combative approach to reducing antisemitism—of course only increases it. Given the history of Jewish anti-semitism, it would not be a surprise if that is Stern’s actual goal.

Stern wrote earlier books Loud Hawk: The United States vs. the American Indian Movement (1994) and A Force Upon the Plain: The American Militia Movement and the Politics of Hate (1996). Stern admits that what is good for pro-Indian causes is good for Jewish causes too:

Antisemitism thrives best in climates that tolerate other prejudices as well. I try to do all I can through my work to educate people about anti-Indian prejudice. I am proud that the American Jewish Committee is increasingly reaching out to Indian country, to support Indian religious freedoms and to combat anti-Indian bigotry. Dennis (Banks) once commented to me that all his lawyers over the years were Jewish. Neither of us thought that was a coincidence. (Epilogue, p. 353)

Neither do any of us. As far back as 1994 Jews were using other racial groups in America in their war on Whites, especially White Christians. So highly motivated, “Stern, a law student at the time, volunteered his services to the defense attorneys and remained with the case until its resolution,” though “The case did not end until 1988, after thirteen years of pretrial litigaion (sic). It stands as the longest pretrial case in U.S. history.”

Also in his book’s Epilogue, Stern presents the list of weapons and bombs the American Indian Movement wrote down in a notebook, one of the government’s exhibits against them. Stern also tells of a map he found in an AIM trailer after the sentencing, which showed 17 U.S. cities covering a span of one year from 1975–76. These were cities visited by the Bicentennial Freedom Train exhibit. Stern says “Nineteenth-century trains had brought subjugation to Indian people.” (p. 351) He fails to note that Jewish bankers such as the Rothschilds and others profited immensely from such rail infrastructure they financed. This evidence of weapons and bombs plus a list of target cities has striking similarities to the charges against the African National Congress and Nelson Mandela at the Rivonia Trial. The ANC and Mandela were also advised and funded by Jews. (The print version, Ostara Publications, updated 2018, contains an Appendix 2, “Mandela’s Jews: Jewish Involvement in the Rivonia Plot,” pp. 170–73)

In A Force Upon the Plain: The American Militia Movement and the Politics of Hate, Stern admits in regard to the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City on April 19, 1995:

Nine days before the blast I had issued a lengthy report on the militia movement for the American Jewish Committee. … In early April I had written that people connected with militias were poised to attack government officials, possibly on April 19, 1995, the second anniversary of the fiery end of the Branch Davidian compound in Waco. (p. 11)

This is an astoundingly accurate prediction, to the exact day, even for such a long-time “expert” on hate  as Kenneth Stern. Jews have displayed advance knowledge of false flag attacks at other times, such as the “Five Dancing Israelis” before 9-11, who were sent by the Israeli Mossad to “document the event.”  Stern does not redirect the blame to “Islamic terrorists” but to White American militias. Does Stern also condemn the similar bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem when 91 people, Arab and British administrators and hotel staff including 17 Israeli Jews were killed by other Israeli Irgun Jews disguised as Arabs?

A damning review of A Force upon the Plain by David B. Kopel (no militia supporter, having been a monthly donor to the Southern Poverty Law Center for 10 years) denounces Stern’s book for lacking any footnotes, describes the link between militias and the Oklahoma City bombing as “tenuous,” and notes that “the Southern Poverty Law Center’s data show that militia members perpetrate violent crimes at a per capita rate far below that of the U.S. population as a whole.” Essentially reversing Stern’s criticism of a documentary about Waco, Kopel describes Stern’s book as “a model of conspiratorial ‘logic’ designed to grab audiences who, if they accepted the premises and did not question the sleight-of-hand, easily could [be] convinced.” Those educated on the Jewish Issue are much harder to convince.

Stern’s latest book is The Conflict Over The Conflict: The Israel/Palestine Campus Debate (2020). Stern was undoubtedly aware of the rising anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian boycott/divestment/sanction movement on campuses led by Students for Justice in Palestine. His book advocates for open debate on the issue:

But (a college) must not shield its students from examining ideas, even clearly hateful ones. After all, if thousands or millions of people believe certain ideas, how do we learn how to combat them if we don’t study them?

Stern’s strategy here is to expose the pro-Palestine side of the debate as “hateful,” and “combat” their views in the open arena of ideas on campus. To provide perspective, Stern says:

I also recommended full-semester interdisciplinary courses on antisemitism. From my experience teaching such a course, even students who have markedly different views on Israel/Palestine, by the time we reach the sections on Israel and Zionism, have a framework for discussing their different perspectives reasonably.

This “framework” is of course sympathy for innocent, suffering, victimized Jews, making students subject to this indoctrination less able to take the Palestinian side. Stern recommends no counter-balancing “full-semester interdisciplinary courses” on anti-Arabism. But doesn’t anti-Semitism also include anti-Arabism, since Arabs are Semites too? Not to Stern. Anti-Semitism means only one thing, and that is hate of Jews just for being Jewish.

Hate for Haters: Recent and Current Endeavors

From 2014 through 2018, Stern was executive director of the Justus & Karin Rosenberg Foundation.

The Justus and Karin Rosenberg Foundation supports – through gifts and direct engagement of the Rosenberg Foundation staff – efforts to combat antisemitism and anti-Israel activity on campus, antisemitic hate crimes, Holocaust denial, antisemitic discourse, state-sponsored antisemitism, and other issues that have a direct impact on the growth of antisemitism.

Under Program Areas, Stern was working hard to indoctrinate college students with his hate obsession. They seem opposed to standard capitalization:

The Foundation provided support to four bard college [sic. students?] through this program in 2018, and the program’s executive director had significant involvement… in this program by (i) helping students identify and secure placements at appropriate ngos, (ii) meeting and regularly corresponding, via email and phone, with the students individually to share his knowledge of relevant issues and to provide contacts in the field in order to prepare each student for his or her internship; (iii) organizing and leading a two-day text study with the interns about hate…

Stern was working hard in other related areas to spread his message of hate, antisemitism and extremism.

The foundation’s executive director provided assistance to other organizations and individuals on issues relating to the Foundation’s mission, including: (I) the committee on the judiciary of the united states house of representatives (tesimony) [sic]; (ii) faculty, administrators and students regarding constructive ways to respond to hatred and antisemitism on various campuses; (iii) leaders of the Foundation for individual rights in education, j street, j street u, academic engagement network, the american association of jewish lawyers and jurists, open hillel, secure community network, and ameinu; (iv) the staff of the u.s. Holocaust memorial museum’s committee on holocaust denial and state-sponsored antisemitism (the executive director serves on this committee); (v) the institue [sic] for hate studies at gonzaga university regarding future programs (the executive director services [sic] on the advisory aboard for the institue) [sic]; (vi) the executive committee of the alliance for academic freedom…

Stern was very active with influences far beyond college campuses, reaching throughout mainstream society:

The Foundation’s executive director helped to educate the public on the Foundation’s mission by participating in educational conferences and writing opinion pieces in national publications; specifically the executive director wrote or co-authored opinion pieces that appeared in the forward (about antisemitism and about white supremacy and about academic freedom), cnn online (about a proposed neo-nazi march), inside higher education (about academic freedom and antisemitism), academe blog (about academic freedom and antisemitism), the richmond times (about academic freedom and antisemitism), post & courier (about academic freedom and antisemitism), and ther la (sic?) jewish journal (about white supremacy). The executive director also spoke before the american association of jewish lawyers and jurists, congrtation (sic) kehalath jesurun. The 92nd street y, the academic engagement network, the national jewish student journalism conference, nyu, congregation beth elohim, friends semnary (sic)…

The Justus and Karin Rosenberg Foundation closed in 2018, but in its final year it granted almost a million dollars to Bard College “To Support the Foundation’s Mission of Working To Combat And To Increase the Serious Study of hatred and Antisemitism.” Since Stern is also director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate, for him as director of the Foundation to donate this money to another organization he directs is a flagrant example of conflict of interest and Jewish nepotism. Stern was paid almost $70,000 in 2018 as director of the Foundation.

As Foundation director in 2017, Stern submitted a 17-page testimony with three appendices to the U. S. House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary Hearing on Examining Anti-Semitism on College Campuses.

In late 2019, President Trump signed an executive order that “affords protection to Jewish students under title VI of the Civil Rights Act.” In his Guardian essay “I drafted the definition of antisemitism. Rightwing Jews are weaponizing it,” Stern complains that “rightwing” Jews were using the executive order to protect the Jewish state of Israel from criticism and denunciation, especially from Students for Justice in Palestine. And to Stern’s outrage, they were using his definition of antisemitism with its examples regarding Israel as a reference. Stern claims, “This order is an attack on academic freedom and free speech, and will harm not only pro-Palestinian advocates, but also Jewish students and faculty, and the academy itself.”

This is not another expression of Jewish Antisemitism, but a example of Jewish in-fighting, in this case between rightwing and leftwing Jews regarding Israel. Stern is leftwing, and cannot condone rightwing Zionist Jews protecting the rightwing government of Israel in this way. He wants open discussion, not over the right of Israel to exist, but over whether a rightwing or leftwing government will lead it.

Today, as noted, Stern “is director of the Bard Center for the Study of Hate, a program of the Human Rights Project at Bard College.” He is motivated to expand the study of hate world-wide:

Stern is also active in the effort to establish an interdisciplinary academic field of Hate Studies. He previously served on the director’s advisory board for the Gonzaga University Institute for Hate Studies, and he remains on the editorial board of the Journal of Hate Studies.


Jewish Professor, spokesman and advocate Kenneth Stern has worked hard through a long and distinguished career to gain mastery of the complex topics of hate, extremism and antisemitism, and spread his knowledge to large masses of people on campus and throughout and wherever Jews reside. In Stern’s advocacy, the heinous traits he studies exist only in non-Jews, never Jews themselves. Stern maintains the long-standing position that Jews are only innocent victims of hate, extremism and antisemitism, never responsible in any way for the hate that is directed toward them. In other words, to Stern there exists no legitimate anti-Semitism. The remedy to this intolerable situation is never for Jews to change their behavior toward non-Jews, but to “combat” antisemitism and hate with indoctrination, intimidation, lawsuits, imprisonment and fear of Jewish power.

Let us close our examination of Quasi Crytpo-Jew Kenneth Stern with solutions he proposed in his 2007 essay “Holocaust education won’t stop hate,” which too few of us have ever seen:

There are many things that can and are being done to combat today’s hatred of Jews. Human rights organizations must be challenged when they do not sufficiently assert that freedom from anti-Semitism is a human right.

Governments must be engaged to ensure that they investigate and prosecute anti-Semitic hate crimes fully. Monitoring groups must catalog not only the old-fashioned forms of religious and racial anti-Semitism, but also the more contemporary forms which treat the Jewish state in the same bigoted manner that traditional anti-Semitism regards the individual Jew.

A Jew such as Stern is obviously highly intelligent. How is it possible that Stern can never see that among the “many things that can be done to combat today’s hatred of Jews” must include Jews changing their destructive behavior toward non-Jews? Hate is not the problem, Jewish behavior is. Everyone experiences hate, and the biggest problem comes from those who do not embrace their own, but project it onto others. Stern only contributes to hatred of Jews with all his hate-mongering, extremism tracking and hyper vigilance for antisemitism. It is difficult to conceive of a more hateful object than a hysterical Jew who has contributed to the ruin of White Christian Patriotic America with an immense blind spot running around pointing fingers at other haters.

Now we know.

60 replies
  1. Xwpis ONOMA
    Xwpis ONOMA says:

    Yes, Stern is intelligent; highly or not I do not care. What is more important though for us the “anti-semites” is that the most obvious quality of his character/personality is the grandiose hypocrisy of his words and actions. Which should be no surprise to those who are studying the dzewish (my spelling) phenomenon. Thanks for this excellent article.

  2. Manfred
    Manfred says:

    The excerpts below prove that the Jewish lobby does not really care about genocides.
    Look at how they have covered up the genocide of Christian Armenians committed by Turkey.
    It’s a disgrace and a sign of Jewish hypocrisy.

    (from a Showdown Set in ‘Genocide’ Debate, Rebecca Spence, The Jewish Daily Forward, September 2, 2006):


    Every year on April 24, the day that Armenians commemorate the killings, a resolution calling for the use of the controversial term is proposed in Congress and then beaten back. Some Jewish groups claim credit for ensuring that such a resolution never passes.

    Jewish advocacy groups, including the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, B’nai Brith and American Jewish Committee “have been working with the Turks on this issue” for more than 15 years, said Yola Habif Johnston, director for foundations and community outreach at Jinsa. “The Jewish lobby has quite actively supported Turkey in their efforts to prevent the so-called Armenian genocide resolution from passing,” she said.

  3. Aiden Lake
    Aiden Lake says:

    Whatever the truth about gas-chambers and execution-pits, let us admit that Hitler’s pre-war statements and wartime actions failed to “solve the Jewish problem”, but instead inflated the post-war Frankenstein Monster briefly sketched here by Karl Haemers. The State of Israel, of course, has not in fact solved it either, as hoped – or claimed.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      Hitler knew the Israel state would never resolve the Jewish Issue. He said it would become a refuge for swindlers and a college for budding crooks. As indeed it has. Hitler wanted it to be administered by the British, not under its own independent management. We know what became of that idea–King David Hotel and all the rest of the terrorism.

      It is unjust to blame Hitler and the NS for failing to resolve the Jewish Issue and ultimately making it worse. It was going to get worse anyway, and the NS made a genuine attempt to resolve it–an excellent example that almost succeeded. A lesson to us all.

      • Nancy Pearl
        Nancy Pearl says:

        I agree that it’s idiotic to blame Hitler and the German people for what has happened. I’m not sure what they were supposed to do when faced with organized jewry wrecking their country. We now face the very same thing, but our people seem to lack the will power to fight back.

        • Ernest Patrick Barch
          Ernest Patrick Barch says:

          We will end up worse than Germany has. As victims of the Stockholm Syndrome most of us in the USA already worship and adore Jews. We are their fat grain-fed cattle and force-fed geese.

      • B. Rockford
        B. Rockford says:

        Quite true that Hitler said that Jews were quite unable to create a state of their own. But what is the source of this statement that he wanted one administered by the British – in Madagascar or where else? Aidan Lake is surely correct in suggesting that the Nazi wartime actions overreached themselves, aroused sympathy for their victims, and ultimately made Jewish organizations more powerful than before.

        • Karl Haemers
          Karl Haemers says:

          National Socialist wartime actions Under-reached themselves. Savitri Devi considers that Hitler was slightly more Sun than Lightning, which was his nature, and so not the final Avatar “Man Against Time.” That is still to come. But he was close.

          • B. Rockford
            B. Rockford says:

            @ Karl Haemers
            The thought of a final, effective, total extermination of every Jew on the planet is the sick father to an impractical, indecent, unnecessary and undesirable wish, here made ridiculous by reference to alien avatar superstitions and and detrimental to a site that seriously claims attention for realistic analysis of world events and various activities by Jews within them.

          • Captainchaos
            Captainchaos says:

            A Nietzschean Superman doesn’t feel the need to appeal to any higher authority than his own balls. Any additional mystical claptrap is entirely unnecessary. Tell the boomers and bourgeois conservatives that and at least they’ll understand, although probably not agree.

          • Karl Haemers
            Karl Haemers says:

            B. Rockford, the “extermination” final resolution is well established here and on many other venues as just another immense hoax. It is ridiculous, not the perception of National Socialist German leader Adolf Hitler as a kind of spiritual avatar or even a messianic figure. The Catholic Church at the time recognized Hitler is this way, particularly for his opposition to Communism, which is of course the painful death of the Church should it take power in the West. Savitri Devi refered to the Hindu religion, which is hardly “superstition,” as it was expressed originally by Indo-Aryans. An entire field of knowledge known as Esoteric Hitlerism is available to us, and while some of it can get exaggerated in my view, the fact of its existence is itself intriguing. I feel this is certainly valid on “a site that seriously claims attention for realistic analysis of world events and various activities by Jews within them.” This is one reason the Church assisted NS leaders to escape the horrors of the “Allied” occupation of Germany, for instance.

          • Captainchaos
            Captainchaos says:

            That’s right, the Catholic Church recognized Hitler as a Hindu god. LOL. Not even a negro crackhead could come up with something that retarded.

  4. Miselius
    Miselius says:

    Edward Gibbon, in the 6th book of his monumental “Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire”, quotes the famous Roman historian Tacitus (abt 56 AD to 120 AD). Who observed that a certain area of Palestine near Jerusalem had unusually strong fortifications, though it would not appear to need them.
    Tacitus supposed that “The founders of the city had foreseen that there would be many wars because the ways of their people differed so from those of the neighbours: therefore they had built at every point as if they expected a long siege….” Original Latin: “…providerant conditores ex diversitate morum crebra bella: inde cuncta quamvis adversus longum obsidium.”
    And after listing some of their less intolerable practices, Tacitus continues: “… The other practices of the Jews are sinister and revolting, and have entrenched themselves by their very wickedness. Wretches of the most abandoned kind who had no use for the religion of their fathers took to contributing dues and free-will offerings to swell the Jewish exchequer; and other reasons for their increasing wealth may be found in their stubborn loyalty and ready benevolence towards brother Jews. But the rest of the world they confront with the hatred reserved for enemies.”
    … And in his “Letter to Flaccus” Cicero makes reference to a dispute with Jews, involving the legitimacy of transporting some gold to Palestine. Cicero begins his narrative with, “You know how these people are…”
    Perhaps ‘Jewish Professor, spokesman and advocate Kenneth Stern’ may launch a new initiative on “How to combat the anti-Semitism of ancient classic historians and lawyers”

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      I’m sure Stern is up to the task. No “anti-semitism” anywhere in the world or at any time in history can be neglected. It will lead to another holocaust, you see. “Never again.”

  5. Birhan Dargey
    Birhan Dargey says:

    Once you pay attention you start being aware of the Jewish power in largely Gentile Christian populations for example: the Majority of Govt officials are all JEWS. The City Councils, the School Boards, the Judicial System, the UNIONS, the Health system, Public Libraries Boards..etc. Once they achieve such power they set the agenda political/economic/cultural/…above and beyond the Nations Constiutional LAWS..because jews only respond to Talmudic laws..This how they come up with psycho/lingustic/narrative aberrations like White Supremacy, White Privelege. USA ultra Zionists speaking about hate and HUman Rights violations and yet killing Palestinians children/old women/ with complete impunity. Isarelies deprived palestinaisn of Water/energy/poison their fields/ fill their homes with sewage toxic liquids…BUT they claim to be the victims, blame the NON jews people for hating them for no reason. The Holocaust/Zionism were never part of the original Judaic theology..Zionists jews Azkhenzis have usurped/ distorted/ weaponized Judaism for their own power/economic greed. Jews had been the root causes of wars/slavery/sex child traffcking/pornography/usury/famine/depressions/ etc. The NOnjews gentile had every right to feel and exercise their moral/legal/human hate against inhuman, UNgodly jewish attrocities….and righteous jews shoul do also.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      An excellent summary. I heartily agree. I would say though that Zionism was always part of Judaic theology, only the True Torah Jews believe the Jewish Messiah (anti-Christ) must come first before they can steal Palestinian land and torture, murder and genocide them.

  6. jank
    jank says:

    yes, we know all this and much much more. there are literally millions of kenneth sterns and tens of thousands of nonprofits, ngo’s and think tanks working for jewish interests. the jews have always been a corrosive COLLECTIVIZED force, exploiting and then destroying society after society. the bigger question is WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?
    It appears to me the early 20th Century Germans suffered the same infection, and came to understand the German Workers Party was the solution. What say you?
    Are we ready to stop bitching about it, and uh, actually begin to out-organize these predators and end this dark age bullshit?

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” yes, we know all this and much much more. there are literally millions of kenneth sterns and tens of thousands of nonprofits, ngo’s and think tanks working for jewish interests. the jews have always been a corrosive COLLECTIVIZED force, exploiting and then destroying society after society. the bigger question is WHAT IS THE SOLUTION? ”

      Firstly ,
      (and closely related others)
      should just forget about trying to eradicate predatory jews and instead just work on acquiring an effective capacity to successfully compete against them for life-sustaining resources ; obviously , that is easier said than done .

      Christianity , both Catholic and Protestant versions , has been a dismal failure in securing Nordic racial preservation since it has not , does not , and cannot be especially concerned with the nascent material realities of a human “race”. In fact , most of Christianity is a sheeple-oriented religion of self-enslavement to chosenhite jewmasterss .

      Perhaps it is time for the worldly multitudes of Christianized Nordics to consider a new and improved eclectic religion more appropriate to and up-to-date with valid authentic empirical scientific realities that have been democraticly established by incontrovertible agreements especially among pertinent scientific communities , organizations , and institutes ; and leave the high value historical records of an endtime religion in care of antique dealers .

      • jank
        jank says:

        “Perhaps it is time for the worldly multitudes of Christianized Nordics to consider a new and improved eclectic religion…”

        A new religion? How about some good ole fashioned logic and reason instead. What is it with this narcotic-like addiciton to supernatural nonsense. Here is humanities LAST EPIPHANY. This planet is a war planet. It has aways been a war planet. It is cut up into hundreds of independent nation states that are trapped in war/warfare processes against each other. These warfare processes are beyond the control of man, and cannot be stopped. All a nation’s people can do is secure themselves through isolation and militarism, with constant, development of new, state of the art weapons systems being the ULTIMATE CONCERN. We exist in a military reality, and nothing has changed since the dawn of time. Heraclitus stated 2600 years ago that “war is the father and king of us all” and this reality has not, and cannot change. The extent that we do not acknowledge this over arching military metaphysics is proof of the extent the jews have managed to brainwash us into levels of absurdites not seen since the dark ages. The solution is exclusive european peoples, living in isolation, under strict militarism. Any other system gets you the shit filled jew system we have now.

        • Weaver
          Weaver says:

          I recall Plato writing how the purpose of the state is war, though cannot now find it using a quick search.

          A problem is that large states are easily overtaken by foreigners. Small states cannot defend themselves.

          British conservatives at some point used to debate over which empire, the US or USSR, were the greater danger, perceiving that they needed to ally with one.

          It’s not such an easy matter unless you envision whites moving to cold, unwanted parts of the world, to take stands in regions no others want. With the Internet, whites could, in theory, do the sort of remote, skilled work others don’t wish to do.

          • jank
            jank says:

            yes, you are correct. Here are two of my favorite Plato Quotes:
            “Only a dead man knows the ned of war”

            “For every state war is incessant and lifelong against every other state…For what most men call peace, this is really only a name–in truth, all states by their very nature are always engaged in an informal war against all other states.” Plato, Laws (1.626A)

        • Weaver
          Weaver says:

          Sam Francis warned that secession could lead to a repeat of once again importing foreign workers. Two motives to import foreign workers that come to my mind:
          1. Cheap labour for capitalists.
          2. Workers who will pay to support retired workers.

          Other motives for immigration include wanting greater economy of scale and wanting more workers to support war ability, state power.

          Similarly, states can wish to expand and so can encourage intermarriage among groups that are to be merged together.

          That’s likely an incomplete list, but it highlights some concerns. Afrikaners developed farms where none had ever been. We could do the same in the frozen wastelands of the world.

          • charles frey
            charles frey says:

            Splendid thought, I can envision it now. Billowing, endless fields of asparagus-like, erect icicles in northern Canada and Russia; as well as Antarctica.

        • Weaver
          Weaver says:

          In reply to Mr. Frey below,

          A trend in farming is towards aeroponics, in-door farming. If a stable power source is to be found, almost any region is habitable.

          The old racialists used to warn that proximity leads to mixing. Humans who live nearby will produce children together. The only means of preserving some genetic grouping is to separate.

          The US, today, is very diverse. Whites, today, are very weak.

          Other options exist. One could move to Hungary, Eastern Europe. Maybe South America has promise.

          Whites are weak. The thing whites excel at is working. As I wrote previously: Afrikaners farmed where none had before. Similarly, the English made Ascension Island habitable… It’s volcanic, barren! This is what whites do well.

          Intermarriage rates are very high currently. Whites do not have children in many parts of the world. Whites are weak, in decline.

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            ” The thing whites excel at is working.”

            Superb observation .

            Translation ___

            [ whites excel at being good modern-day slaves ] .

            The jewmasterss are the majority of immediate/ultimate owners/employers of those jobs .

        • Karl Haemers
          Karl Haemers says:

          The modern and post-modern world has trended increasingly toward peace, including a period of more than 200 years of “civilized warfare” conducted by Europeans until broken by WW2.
          Most wars today are instigated and provoked and even engineered by evil people that operate beyond the power of nation-states, many of them Jews. If left to their own, nation-states would overwhelmingly arrange peaceful resolution to inter-nation conflict, leading to almost total world-wide security, peace, prosperity and relative contentment. WW2 itself was engineered away from the peace Hitler wanted and worked for, and into the immense conflict it became, by international forces, particularly Communists and Jewish bankers.
          So another resolution is displacement of Neo-Communists and Jews from international power structures (UN, WEF, etc.) and firm Nationalist leadership arranging peace, prosperity and cultural autonomous but interactive harmony with all other nations, including non-white ones.

          • moneytalks
            moneytalks says:

            ” If left to their own, nation-states would overwhelmingly arrange peaceful resolution to inter-nation conflict, leading to almost total world-wide security, peace, prosperity and relative contentment.”

            Wishful sheeple thinking .

            Worldly wars are national government-level competitions for scarce/limited resources ; where power struggle wars are for control over the resource genericly called “humanity”.

            Wars are neither instigated nor commanded by sheeple whom are by nature noncompetitive . nonpredatory and normally quite willing to be enslaved to any predatory winner of any particular war contest .

            Furthermore , the biological imperative of all living beings ( includes also humanity ) to secure life-sustaining resources , which are virtually always practically limited in quantity , is relentless . Consequently , a potential for lethal conflict among nonsheeple humanity is inexorable , especially among large politicly identified groups , as a result of the inescapable biological imperative to secure resources .

            Moreover , persons whom think that wars to exterminate resource competitors , other than themselves , would engender “peace on earth” are fooling themselves and perhaps also fooling many others if for no other reason than the inexorable operation of the biological imperative for all living beings to secure resources . In other words , wars should normally be limited to only securing/winning a resource for an indefinite time but normally not winning forever by attempting to exterminate a resource enemy competitor whom could otherwise at some future time possibly become a vital resource to the present contest winner .

        • moneytalks
          moneytalks says:

          ” A new religion? How about some good ole fashioned logic and reason instead.”

          You jump to conclusions . Where did I insinuate that a new religion would not be focussed on logic and reason in contrast to Christianity which defaults in leaps and bounds into a mindless faith in supernaturalism ?

        • moneytalks
          moneytalks says:

          …” development of new, state of the art weapons systems being the ULTIMATE CONCERN.”

          It may be an
          ” ULTIMATE CONCERN “.

          However , it most assuredly
          could not be a

          { PRIME CONCERN }

          for all humanity worldwide

          since that ULTIMATE CONCERN does not address

          the one and only common normal interest of all humanity worldwide and of their progeny
          ( in accord with the valid scientific
          [ Principle of Induction ] )

          to thrive-n-survive
          continuously into the future
          and especially beyond the

          [ one and only ] [ immediately next ]
          [ specified ] and
          [ Guaranteed Inevitable ]

          {{ Solar TOTAL Extinction Event }}

          whereby all extant humanity here on planet earth

          will be exterminated

          and perish forever into the abyss of

          the DOOM of OBLIVION

          upon the commencement of that Extinction Event .

          Clearly ,

          the { PRIME CONCERN }

          cannot logicly be subordinate to

          the ULTIMATE CONCERN howsoever important it may be .

          Obviously ,

          the continuous survival of humanity
          ( or any part of it including also military organized cultures )

          into the future

          will depend on
          comprehending and then
          organizing economic activities
          in accord with

          the sublime attribute of

          the { PRIME CONCERN }

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      I understand the impulse for a Final Resolution of the Jewish Issue. Our current stage still includes detailed identification of the enemy, always an essential part of a Resolution.
      I have been contemplating a new series focused on Resolutions. The last chapter in my new book Covert Covid Culprits: An Inquest Chronicle (best found at The Barnes Review, though it is on Amazon currently), is titled “The Final Resolution of the Jewish Issue: A Jungian Perspective”, and gives at least a summary and list of a gestalt of Resolutions taken all together. I confess I am not certain even a gestalt of Resolutionary measures can succeed, but it is a place to start. Other authors have provided “solutions” to the “Jewish problem” or “answers” to the “Jewish question,” but I maintain that it is an Issue to be Resolved, a more complex and comprehensive approach.
      May I suggest searching the blog menu here on TOO and seeing if you can find at least “solutions” and “answers” that have been proposed, and reporting back with a summary? This is a necessary effort that must be made now.

      • B. Rockford
        B. Rockford says:

        @ Karl Haemers
        I have yet to read and evaluate your case for identifying the Jewish spider at the covert center of an immense web; Norman Spinrad’s “Iron Dream” comes to mind. Meantime, regarding Jung, his essays in “Civilization in Transition” (1970), p.213 [the “wrong track” of antisemitism] & p.544 [Jewish detachment from the earth], get a correct balance, unlike the ‘”Fuehrer” Teutonicus’. Incidentally, the Barnes Review published an unsatisfactory booklet on the Madagascar project.

  7. B. Rockford
    B. Rockford says:

    It would certainly be useful accurately to document an exhaustive compendium of “anti-Semitic” statements during the past 3,500 years or so of the unique “longest hatred” from Moses onwards, including of course the anti-Zionist comments so regarded today. Anthony Julius compiled a huge anthology of English writers alone. Since Jewish sources themselves conveniently provide numerous examples, they could hardly object to such a compilation – without commentary. One useful source, the ultra-prolific Professor Emeritus of Judaism, Dan Cohn-Sherbok, has argued that anti-Semitism has been an asset, sadly now declining, to ethnic solidarity and survival. Certain persistent themes in different times and climes of “Judeophobia” include self-righteous misanthropy: always the innocent victim of the Evil Other. It is certainly a phenomenon that invites objective study, without censorship on one side or hatred on the other.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      I once had a booklet titled “What Famous Men Said About Jews,” or similar. By no means the comprehensive resource you propose, it was revelatory.

  8. Lady Strange
    Lady Strange says:

    It would be interesting to study the role that mental pathologies (evident in this “hysterical Jew”) play in many (and not a minority ) of them, and their compulsive need to destroy the host nations.

    When they had not yet infested all European societies, these studies on their mental and physical state were numerous.
    Before World War II, in France, it was common knowledge that Jews monopolized hospital beds to the detriment of the natives because of their numerous pathologies, and that they exhibited an extremely higher rate of mental illness than the general population. I believe I even read on this site that the English pathologists of the time had come to the same conclusions.
    Of course, after the war, all this research and legitimate concerns were banned.
    How can we be surprised that everything goes wrong when a literal Jewish lunatic asylum is in charge?

    • B. Rockford
      B. Rockford says:

      @ Lady Strange
      Studies by Jewish writers worth perusal: “Judaism & Mental Illness” & “What are Jewish Genetic Diseases?”, My Jewish Learning, online; Raphael Falk, “Zionism & the Biology of the Jews” (2017); Mitchell B. Hart, “Jews & Race” (2011); John Glad, “Jewish Eugenics” (2011); Harry Ostrer, “Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People” (2012). Jon Entine’s “Abraham’s Children” (2008) lists typical diseases of Ashkenazim and Sephardim in an Appendix.
      Some Zionists thought that Jews could recover mental and physical health by a return to farms in the Holy Land, a neo-Lamarckian expectation. Eugenics is successfully practised in Israel today.
      Jews are usually free of alcoholism (Purim celebrations apart) and score low on crimes of violence. They are aware of their neurotic tendencies. Their obvious prominence in medicine, research and psychiatry, though less so in surgery, may indicate traditional “hypochondriac morbidity” along with high intelligence and scientific curiosity. The stereotype of the wailing pain-obsessed patient crops up in their own humour.

      • Karl Haemers
        Karl Haemers says:

        Tay-Sachs disease is a known Jewish genetic disorder.
        Jews practiced eugenics in the past by sending their brightest sons–identified by their mastery of Talmud studies–West to breed with European elites. This had a dysgenic ‘brain drain’ effect on Eastern Jews, notable today.
        I am planning on writing an essay on sadistic Jewish doctors. Jewish sadism and cruelty is well documented and of prominence in Jewish pathology, also a main cause of “anti-semitism.”

  9. RockaBoatus
    RockaBoatus says:

    “It is difficult to conceive of a more hateful object than a hysterical Jew who has contributed to the ruin of White Christian Patriotic America with an immense blind spot running around pointing fingers at other haters” – True, Jews do have an “immense blind spot” that prevents them from either receiving legitimate criticism of them as a people, or learning from the destructive patterns that has caused them to be booted from at least 109 different countries.

    I have wondered at times why this is so. I think the vast majority of Jews fail to see their own blind spots in this regard because they have been bombarded their entire lives with the idea that they are the “good guys,” history’s “eternal victims” who have done nothing to earn the rejection they have received from others. They can do no wrong. They are all collectively innocent, and any ethnic criticism of them is seen as stemming solely from “anti-Semitism” and “jealousy” of their successes.

    Like Blacks in America who interpret any adversity or misfortune in their lives as the result of “racism” or the “legacy of slavery,” so also Jews have deceived themselves into believing similar lies. It may be defensive or protective in nature, no doubt, but it largely prevents Jews from learning important lessons about themselves. The same culturally subversive patterns, then, are repeated generation after generation – until, once again, their parasitical schemes are exposed, and they get another swift boot out of whatever country they’ve ravaged.

    • Weaver
      Weaver says:

      It is curious. They are manipulated by their own people somehow.

      I told one fairly recently of Jews wanting a state in the Soviet Union. He told me that he knows all since he’s actually Jewish, family from Soviet Union.

      I had to print things out to change his mind… He’s also for mass immigration into the US, otherwise “conservative.”

      This same guy claims Jews couldn’t have dominated the Bolsheviks, because some family member of his, an uncle I think, told him it’s false. He otherwise gives the impression of being a good person.

      • B. Rockford
        B. Rockford says:

        The Jewish Autonomous Oblast established in far eastern Russia nine decades ago now has hardly any Jews in it and none want to go there.

        • Weaver
          Weaver says:

          That also is what he believed me to be referring to. However, I was referring to something different.

          Jews wanted Crimea at one point. I just checked, Solzhenitsyn’s 200 Years mentions their wanting another area also: former Volga German Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, where Jewish settlements were established in the wake of expulsions.

          Birobidzhan was another location, according to 200 Years. It’s an interesting book, which seems mostly true and completely well-intended as truth.

          • B. Rockford
            B. Rockford says:

            The JAO = Birobdzan.
            There used to be a number of Jewish movements suggesting this or that Territory around the world, but the “Tomorrow Jerusalem” lot (hardly surprisingly) won out, and have since dominated Jewish communities, thereby excluding various religious or communist people.

    • Armoric
      Armoric says:

      “an immense blind spot”

      Having blind spots is more or less the same thing as being hypocritical and practicing self-deception: it means you lack honesty not just with other people, but with yourself. But my impression is that the Jews are consciously anti-White. I doubt they need to lie to themselves about their murderous motivations and goals. It’s the goyim who practice self-deception, by refusing to see that the government and the media want them dead.

      The anti-racist/anti-White propaganda is very intimidating. Anyone who protests against the race replacement program will be accused of being an evil “racist”. When Whites see their country invaded and the protesters persecuted, they should complain that the government is anti-White. But under pressure, they tend to keep quiet. They behave as if nothing was wrong. They tell themselves that they had better be stoic, tolerant, understanding. It’s a form of self-deception. If they could hear pro-White opinions in the media, they would start being more honest to themselves. But when you crush free speech, people’s reactions become muted. Censorship means that the Jews also become less aware of the evil they do, but it doesn’t make them innocent.

      There are also politicians, leftists, and all kinds of crooks who work along with the Jews for race replacement. The politicians are in it for the money. The leftists do it for the fake glory, the virtuous signaling, and the fun of destroying things. But most of them are not anti-White. I think those various people who collaborate with the Jews are the ones who are full of blind spots and lie to themselves about the harm they do. It would be interesting to know what’s going on in their minds. But someone like Kenneth Stern must know what he is doing.

      If Jews had a reason to practice self-deception, it would be to help them carry out their genocidal agenda by making them less aware that it is genocidal. When White people lie to themselves, it is usually because they prefer to think that Western governments are made up of good people and that the Jews can’t be that bad. Jews and Whites do not resort to self-deception for the same reasons.

    • B. Rockford
      B. Rockford says:

      This refusal to see themselves as others see them (or publicly admit faults) has exceptions, (whose exponents are promptly accused of Selbsthass) is certainly a phenomenon that requires investigation, in their own interest. It resembles autism in its egocentricity, self-righteousness, paranoia, oversensitivity, lack of empathy, hysterical outrage, and control-freakery, and could have a genetic component.
      Of course, there are both Zionist and religious leaders who for various reasons want to keep the community together and continue in future. Theodor Herzl’s “Jewish State” did not blame the Gentile world entirely for the incompatibility. Hannah Arendt said that Zionists welcome antisemitism in order to populate Israel. Rabbi Hugo Gryn once said that Jews never feel secure unless they are supreme. Prof. Simon Schama has described Jews outside Israel as perpetual nomads, with a bedside suitcase to escape the next persecution, only to be told by Dr Ilan Manor that Jews in Israel are in the same boat in fear of Islamic terrorism.

  10. Biden's Balloon
    Biden's Balloon says:

    If these guys continue to study Nazi literature,
    they will soon put on a dashing uniform & con-
    sider themselves “only legitimate heirs of A.H.”!

    When Dutch women speak German, it’s
    the sexiest accent our ears have ever he-
    ard. That’s probably what Mr. Kurowski
    (an original Slavic name) thought when
    he accepted Mrs. de Graaf’s phone offer.


    Ms. de Graaf was allowed to
    bag 2 million euros for a prize.

    Kurowski is said to have been a great swind-
    ler, fraudster and history fantasist who was
    primarily concerned with increasing wealth.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      Thank you for your reference to the Renegade Tribune article.
      It is relevant today to study National Socialist solutions, not to admiringly install them wholesale or ourselves, but to learn from their successes and failures and apply them in adapted form for our needs today.
      I’m sure the author and readers know that uniforms and such are a kind of fetish (though not entirely insincere), and that they are not any kind of “heir” of Hitler (he apparently had no offspring himself), but that some of them may be heirs of the ancient and modern Aryans, and that all of them are heirs to Hitler’s problems and to some extent his resolutions.

  11. Flavia
    Flavia says:

    I’m currently in the middle of Henry Ford’s “The International Jew.” It’s quite a revelation, particularly in the fact that Ford discusses the typical Jewish response to what we now call Noticing in such a way that it could have been written yesterday. I find it hard to believe it’s 103 years old! I also can’t believe he’s referred to as an anti-Semite, but then he does point out that Jews include the mere mentioning of Jewish power in their definition of anti-Semitism. Almost every point in the above essay is covered by Ford! (I say that not as a criticism, but in complete amazement at how prescient he was.) And yet here we are, on the same hamster wheel.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      I’ve noticed the same phenomenon. People said the same long before Ford, so perhaps he was less prescient and more standing on the shoulders…
      The hamster wheel seems only to have gotten bigger and is spinning faster. How will it Resolve?

  12. anonym
    anonym says:

    “A Jew such as Stern is obviously highly intelligent.” Jews, as a collective, are intelligent in a short sighted “clever” way. An intelligent European have to think within the bounds of the nationstate and the society (or at least had to, before our culture became borderless and judaized). Intelligent Wall Street Jews create air-money thorugh clever manipulation, while intelligent Europeans farm, invent and manufacture real wealth.

    The clever Jews become wealthy “by proxy”, and that’s when the big problems start – when they gain political power. When someone like Milton Friedman, who knows how to make air-money, becomes an economical guru, and starts giving advice on how to run a European economy. Then we get lots of air, lots of exploitation – and less and less wealth.

    I wouldn’t rule out that their constant befuddlement over antisemitism is genuine – they genuinly don’t see the difference between the wealth created by Henry Ford and the Rothschilds. To them money IS wealth. They take the wealth producing host for granted – food and products to buy and sell comes as from nowhere – and view real wealth as just a vehicle for money.
    This shortsightedness encompass everything they do, from science to religion, business, politics and art. A high IQ person who become rich as a usurer, tax collector and vice peddler (as they have historically) and is continually astonished at how much people dislike him, is not intelligent in a meaningful way.

    Another just as stupid example can be found right now in Malmö in Sweden, where “antisemitism” is “skyrocketing”. Jewish organizations complain and reach out to politicians to solve this “puzzling” reappearence of hatred. Campaigns for “education” about the Holocaust, harsher laws etc etc. But the fact that Malmö now has tens of thousands of palestinians, thanks to Jewish lobbying for mass immigration, can’t be mentioned – unless you want to be called racist and antisemite by the Jews. There has to be a limit to how stupid you are allowed to be.

    Jews as a collective aren’t intelligent in our sense of the word, at best they are very clever idiots.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      You make good points. I have often marveled at how stupid and foolish Jews appear to be, in exactly the ways you describe. Their reaction to “anti-semitism” only increases it, which is a good example of stupidity. Yet as you also say, Jews may be “clever idiots” or what Stoddard called “high-grade defectives.” These are the most dangerous part of the population to civilization and in our case Whites, and Jews provide an overwhelming number of such types.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      ” To them money IS wealth.”

      I am beginning to wonder if Nordics/Whites also lack an adequate genetic basis for comprehending that

      [ money IS wealth ]

      since descendants of rural cultures apparently certainly do lack a genetic basis that would support large scale political activism .

      In any case , [ money IS wealth ] so long as it can be used to make purchases as usual .

      In particular , a genuine U.S. dollar is by definition “real money” and is an item of wealth so long as it has at least some value and can normally be used to make purchases of customary economic goods and services . Money that has no value among the public and cannot be used to make purchases is by definition not “real money” and is not usually an item of wealth . In other words , only actually worthless money , which cannot normally be used by the public to make purchases , is not an item of wealth because worthless money is not “real money” .

      It is easy to understand , without resorting to derogatory attributions , why jews whom have the correct understanding that [ money IS wealth ] are normally more financially fit than Nordics/Whites whom have a long-standing incorrect and intractable understanding that [ money is not wealth ] .

      Here is a link below , at the end of this reply , to an erudite essay that just recently for the first time ever has one graph by the U.S. Federal Government Bureau of Economic Analysis and another graph by the Federal Reserve Bank which together show that “the rich” extracted

      FIFTY ( 50 ) TRILLION ( with a T ) dollars

      from the middle classes from 1975 to 2018 .
      That would normally be more than enough loss of money/wealth to easily instigate a civil war of emancipation from the jewmasterss .

      However , there is not even a minor disturbance among Nordics/Whites not only because of a pervasive lack of adequate DNA components to support large scale political activism but also because You and the vast majority of Nordics ignorantly believe the ridiculous propaganda meme that genuine official viable fiat money is not real wealth .

      I have unsuccessfully tried to explain many times in www comments about this false notion , which adults
      ( including also many so-called financial experts )
      at every social level believe ,
      that [ viable money is not wealth ] . Apparently it is too difficult for normally politicly retarded Nordics to understand the nature of fiat wealth or , to facilitate Nordic denigration of jewish money intelligence , they are being willfully ignorant about it .

      Have no doubt “the rich” are laughing all the way to the bank as they have succeeded in totally convincing about 100 million USA Nordic/White adults into believing their viable money is not real wealth .

      Further elaboration is beyond the scope of this comment .


  13. Luke
    Luke says:

    As bad as the Orange Cuck was as far as pandering and sucking up to Israel and the jewish lobby, let me warn anyone on the pro-White right who might be thinking that it’s wise to dump Trump in favor of Deep State Ron DeSantis in 2024.

    DeSantis, as governor of Florida, is soon going to put his signature on bill that is moving through the State legislature that was clearly written either by the ADL or under the supervision of the ADL – that will effectively abolish free speech in Florida if that speech is in anyway critical of the Self Chosen Children of Satan or critical of their poisonous spider nest in the Middle East.

    DeSantis is an even bigger shabez goy jewish toe sucker than the Orange Man was, and he is being endorsed by the loathsome likes of Jeb Bush, the war mongering psychopath John Bolton, the race mixer duo of Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan and every other RINO, globalist, White race replacement supporting, war mongering, open borders loving, Israel owned scum such as Ben Shapiro, Bill Kristol, Karl Rove, Mitt Romney, Jonah Goldberg, etc, etc.

    Was I 100 percent pleased with the Orange Man’s 4 years in office? No. Did the gut learn any lessons about who he needs to hire and refuse to hire, if he wins in 2024?
    I sure hope so. But, right now – there is NOBODY else running who openly claims to support the MAGA movement and who promises to stop letting the jewish neocons and Deep State drag us into endless wars for the sole benefit of the stolen state of Israel. Nobody else who promises to secure our border, build a wall, who refuses to give amnesty to 35-40 million illegal criminal aliens – and yes, I have not forgotten that Trump failed to keep a lot of his 2016 promises on the issues I just mentioned. But, everyone who opposes him and wants to kill the MAGA movement are lining up behind Deep State DeSantis because he is their sledgehammer to kill MAGA permanently and to revert back to the Bush-Cheney endless wars and open borders and nation wrecking NWO globalist policies that are destroying America.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      Point taken. DeSantis is no new Hitler. Trump was not either, but at least he is the lesser of 2 evils?
      We need a powerful White-oriented 3rd party. Perhaps the National Justice Party can become it, but that is some ways off, and possibly never.

  14. KT-88
    KT-88 says:

    The “Dancing Israelis” were almost certainly the ones that planted the explosives in the WTC buildings. Their van even tested positive for explosives. Of course the FBI shredded all the photos and just a few photocopies remain. I’m surprised they were even detained.

    • Karl Haemers
      Karl Haemers says:

      All the demolition materials planted in the Twin Towers and Building 7 took months to deploy and teams of many people to install. The 5 Dancing Israelis were tasked with documenting the event and perhaps deploying a bomb to a bridge to add to the chaos and outrage against “Arabs”. But yes, certainly their kind planted the explosives.

Comments are closed.