A Vibrant Vulva: More on Jews and Their Nazi-Adjacent “Natural Allies”
The Mystery of the Missing Monosyllable. That’s what I want to look at today. Except that it isn’t really a mystery. I know perfectly well why the Trotskyist libertarian Tom Slater wasn’t prepared to use one short word in his righteous condemnation of an anti-Israeli musician. But he was prepared to use another short word to describe the musician. The evasive and faux-fierce monosyllable he did use was “cunt.” The honest and relevant monosyllable he didn’t use was “Black.”
A dismayed and distressed disclosure
And who was the vulval villain? Bobby Vylan, that’s who. He’s the dreadlocked lead-singer of a Black punk-rap duo called Bob Vylan, whose performance at the Glastonbury music festival was broadcast live by the BBC. The vibrant Vylan led the overwhelmingly White and middle-class crowd in chants of “Free Palestine!” and “Death, death to the IDF!” (Israel Defence Forces). Like the stale and stodgy British prime minister Keir Starmer, Tom Slater was dismayed and distressed by these chants. He denounced Mr Vylan at Spiked for inciting “Jew hatred,” then sadly disclosed that “the murderous rantings of that cunt turn my stomach less than the roaring adulation of the crowd.”[1] He also bewailed “blood libels against the world’s only Jewish nation.” But the monosyllable “Black” did not appear anywhere in Tom’s jeremiad, despite the obvious relevance of the vulval villain’s race to his politics — and to the “adulation” he received from that roaring, anti-racist crowd.
Stale Stodgy Starmer versus Vibrant Vulval Villain: Friend of Israel Keir Starmer and Enemy of Israel Bobby Vylan (images from Novara and Guardian)
Nor did the word “Black” appear anywhere in the anti-Vylan jeremiad issued in parallel by Tom’s comrade Brendan O’Neill at the Spectator. Brendan denounced “the lead singer” for inciting a “frenzy of Israelophobia” in his audience, but didn’t add any details about that “lead singer.” But he was able to add details about the audience, which consisted, he said, of “bourgeois youth” and “privileged youths” “issuing mantras of death.” So is Bobby Vylan “bourgeois” and “privileged” too? No, he’s not. He’s an authentically angry, self-righteous and resentment-filled working-class Black who has, like Tom and Brendan, picked a side in the Gaza conflict.[2] Surprise, surprise! Black Bobby hasn’t picked the same side as White Tom and Brendan. No, he sides with the dark-skinned Palestinians who are being blown to bits by bombs rather than with the pale-skinned Israelis who are dropping the bombs. Bobby Vylan’s race is obviously relevant to his pro-Palestinian politics, but that’s precisely why Tom Slater and Brendan O’Neill refused to discuss his race. They’re passionate supporters of both Jewish welfare and free speech, you see, so they can’t admit that those two things are completely incompatible with something else they passionately support. Or once supported, anyway. Here’s Brendan issuing a righteous call for open borders in 2015:
We shouldn’t demonise or infantilise African migrants. We should welcome them. … We shouldn’t pity these migrants; we should admire them, for using guile, gumption and perseverance to come here. They’re precisely the kind of people sluggish Europe needs more of, an antidote to our students who can’t even clap without having a mental breakdown and our new generation who think that being told to ‘get on your bike’ to look for a job is tantamount to abuse. Let’s relax the borders and let them in to try their luck in our countries and see how they fare. If we do that, we’ll put the traffickers out of business, end the deaths in the Mediterranean, and, more importantly, do our part to enable the aspirations of human beings who have committed no crime other than wanting to realise their potential in our towns, our cities, alongside us. (“Let Them In,” Spiked Online, 21st April 2015)
Ten years later, having seen how they’ve “fared,” Brendan has had second thoughts about some of those admirably aspirant migrants.[3] Where once he waxed lyrical in support of open borders, he now lists that very support among the three worst examples of the “cranky shite” urged upon sane folk by the “bourgeois [and] privileged youths” of the woke left: “transwomen are women, open the borders, Israel is bad.” Indeed, in 2025 Brendan is loudly proclaiming that a certain class of “migrants” simply “shouldn’t be allowed in Britain.” That’s right: we shouldn’t admire these migrants or celebrate their “guile, gumption and perseverance.” We shouldn’t welcome them as an “antidote” to “sluggish Europe” or “enable” their “aspirations … to realize their potential.” Not at all. Far from enabling, we should exclude.
The group that really matters
And who are the migrants whom Brendan now wants to exclude from Britain? Is it perhaps migrants who threaten women and homosexuals with more rape and murder? Or migrants whose low intelligence, lack of education and chronic diseases mean they will be a permanent burden on the British economy? No, not at all. In 2025 Brendan is still unconcerned about the misogyny, homophobia and economic harmfulness of Third-World migrants. His criterion for exclusion is something quite different: “Migrants who hate Jews shouldn’t be allowed in Britain.” Yes, it’s Jews who matter. Not women, homosexuals or White tax-payers — Jews! But Brendan’s new-found opposition to open borders raises an obvious question. What about the Jew-hating migrants who were allowed into Britain in decades past? What about their Jew-hating descendants? The two Black members of Bob Vylan are among those descendants. So are a vastly disproportionate number of those participating in the pro-Hamas, anti-Israel marches that Brendan O’Neill and Tom Slater have regularly condemned at Spiked and the Spectator. What do we do about those home-grown non-White Jew-haters?
That is a very tricky question for the libertarians Brendan O’Neill and Tom Slater. You see, on the one hand, they’re passionate supporters of Jewish welfare and free speech. And on the other, they are — or used to be — equally passionate supporters of non-White immigration. But imported non-Whites are much more likely to hate Jews and free speech than indigenous Whites are. There’s an obvious contradiction between philosemitic libertarianism and support for non-White immigration. Brendan and Tom can neither admit that contradiction nor resolve it. And that explains the Mystery of the Missing Monosyllable. It explains why Brendan and Tom refused to describe the “Israelophobic” Bobby Vylan as “Black,” despite the obvious relevance of his race to his politics. They were evading reality and refusing to admit the consequences of their own ideology.
A Professor of Puppets
But that missing monosyllable and evasion of reality aren’t the only things that unite the jeremiads of Brendan and Tom. In tone and content their articles were uncannily similar. But you can say that of everything the two of them write, because they don’t have minds of their own. Instead, they handed their minds over long ago to a “Professor of Puppets,” a Jewish sociologist called Frank Furedi. Freedom-fanatic Furedi is an excellent example of a recurring figure identified by Kevin MacDonald in Western history, that of the charismatic Jewish guru who recruits and molds a group of devoted disciples to serve overt or covert Jewish interests. Jews like Furedi have long regarded non-White immigration as very good for Jews. They don’t like standing out as a minority in homogenous White societies, because they fear that their financial predation and cultural subversion will trigger yet another of the persecutions or expulsions they’ve suffered so often in the past. Accordingly, Jews have worked hard to open the borders and import the non-Whites whom many of them have described as “natural allies”:
- British Jews and Muslims are natural allies, Dr Richard Stone, The Independent, 15th August 2001
- Jews and Muslims are natural allies against religious discrimination, Daisy Khan and Rabbi Burton Visotzky, The Hill, 24th August 2017
- Former CST boss will help Muslim group battle Islamophobia, The Jewish Chronicle, 10th April 2014
- Muslims and Jews face a common threat from white supremacists. We must fight it together, Jonathan Freedland and Mehdi Hasan, The Guardian, 3rd April 2019
- Both Feeling Threatened, American Muslims and Jews Join Hands, Laurie Goodstein, The New York Times, 5th December 2015
- Jewish women ‘stand shoulder to shoulder’ with Muslim women over Islamophobic abuse, The Jewish Chronicle, 19th April 2018
- Jewish and Muslim women pledge to work together to combat hate, The Jewish Chronicle, 24th April 2018
- Jews and Muslims should unite in fight against racism, The Jewish Chronicle, 28th March 2018
- Board president Marie van der Zyl pledges to be ‘committed ally’ of Muslims at interfaith Iftar, The Jewish Chronicle, 13th July 2018
- Our Jewish community must do more to support Muslims attacked by Islamophobes, The Jewish Chronicle, 8th August 2018
- Jews and Muslims ramp up alliances in wake of Trump’s election, The Jewish Standard, 15th November 2016
- This young Jewish woman and a young Muslim woman teach schoolkids about racism, The Jewish Chronicle, 7th February 2019
But oy gevalt! Those “natural allies” have turned out to be Nazi-adjacent. After Hamas murdered, raped and kidnapped hundreds of Israeli Jews in October 2023, Jews in the West watched in dismay as their “natural allies” poured onto the streets of New York, London and Paris not in support of poor persecuted Israel but of murderous and rapist-replete Hamas. That’s why the Jewish libertarian Frank Furedi has changed his mind about open borders. He’s decided that they’re not so good for Jews after all. And when Frank changes his mind, so do Brendan O’Neill, Tom Slater and the rest of Frank’s RoboRoaches. Brendan was proclaiming “Let Them In!” back in 2015 and is now proclaiming that “Migrants who hate Jews shouldn’t be allowed in Britain.” But Brendan still hasn’t admitted his own complicity in supporting non-White immigration for so long. And some Jews still haven’t abandoned their support for open borders. The following plea appeared on 20th June in the Jewish Chronicle:
Schmoozing for refugees in the Jewish Chronicle
The Schmooze: This Refugee Week, let’s open our hearts to those seeking a safe haven
Rabbi David Mason of HIAS-JCORE [Hebrew Immigration Aid Society and Jewish Council for Racial Equality] argues that welcoming refugees is fundamental to the Jewish value of tzedakah — justice
If I were to ask JC readers what makes them proudest of our UK Jewish communities, I’m sure we would hear a few common answers. Perhaps some would say our schools and academic institutions — or maybe our cultural achievements, diversity, or resilience. But for many — like me — it would be the work with tzedakah at its core. This enduring commitment to social justice — our deep sense of responsibility — is surely one of our community’s greatest assets.
That is why this year’s Refugee Week theme — Community as a Superpower — feels especially fitting. And it is a great opportunity to celebrate the many wonderful projects British Jews run alongside displaced people. This is work I have long admired. Even prior to taking over at HIAS+JCORE, I saw involvement with refugee issues as a critical part of my role as a community Rabbi, and something embedded in my Jewish identity.
Today, it’s a continued source of inspiration to me that so many British Jews are passionate about this work. Of course, this is driven by our values and teaching: but our history is just as important. In fact, it’s a rare week where I don’t hear a personal story or connection which drives these efforts — the parents, grandparents and great-grandparents who were given sanctuary in the UK.
Then, as now, it hasn’t always been smooth sailing for people who reach this country, seeking that chance to rebuild and start afresh in safety. It is painful to see just how damaging our system is for people seeking asylum here today. But it gives me such strength to see our community empowering refugees, helping them to overcome these barriers, and ensuring that they have a fair chance to integrate and restart. […]
At HIAS+JCORE, we are really proud of our JUMP [JCORE’s Unaccompanied Minors Project] befriending project, a programme supporting asylum seeking and refugee young people, but shaped and led by our beneficiaries.
JUMP often leaves a lasting impression on its volunteers. As Josh Stein, who has been involved with the programme for a number of years, shared with me: “Volunteering with JUMP has been a huge part of my life… [it’s] not just introduced me to a good friend (and a great community), but it has also taught me a lot about other cultures, and about the value of simple companionship and support.”
Josh also reflected on how his identity as a British Jew informs this volunteering. “Being part of a Jewish community in South London proved to me the value of societal acceptance and cohesion… I always felt we had a responsibility to open our communities to others facing discrimination similar to the discrimination we have suffered in our history, and being part of JUMP is a way of doing that.”
So, let’s make this year’s Refugee Week a celebration of everything we’re already doing. But my challenge to our communities this week is this: let’s use this moment to go even further. It is clear just how much of a superpower we can be together. With divisive forces rising in UK politics, let’s stay true to our roots and values. Now, more than ever, is the time for us to show today’s refugees that they are welcome and that we stand firmly by their side. (“The Schmooze: This Refugee Week, let’s open our hearts to those seeking a safe haven,” The Jewish Chronicle, 20th June 2025)
Is it true that “welcoming refugees is fundamental to the Jewish value of tzedakah”? No, obviously not. If “Jewish values” genuinely mandated a warm welcome for refugees, then Israel would be one of the most refugee-friendly places on earth. In fact, Israel is one of the most refugee-hostile places on earth, having fortified its borders with high-tech fences to keep out the “huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” That’s a line from the famous pro-migration poem by the Jewish activist Emma Lazarus (1849–87). But she was addressing gullible goyim in White America and the syrupy sentiments of her poem are not celebrated in Jewish Israel. Nor are the syrupy sentiments expressed by Emma’s co-ethnic Israel Zangwill (1864–1926), who proclaimed that White America should be a “melting pot” for every race and religion on earth.
“Melting pots are good for you, goyim!” The ethnocentric Jews Emma Lazarus and Israel Zangwill
Emma and Israel prove that there is only one eternal and unshakable “Jewish value.” It can be summed up in this simple question: “What’s best for Jews?” That’s why I was unmoved by the conclusion to Tom Slater’s invective against that vibrant vulval villain:
British Jews have known for some time that they cannot rely on [the woke left] for solidarity. All the more reason for the sane, truly anti-racist majority — those who can see what is going on and are quietly horrified by it — to stand with their Jewish brothers and sisters, loudly and proudly. This really isn’t their problem. It’s ours. (“Bob Vylan, Glastonbury and the banality of Jew hatred,” Spiked Online, 29th June 2025)
Slater is wrong. It is indeed “their problem.” Decade after decade, Jews have been central organizers of both non-White immigration and the vilification of Whites as racist oppressors. Now it turns out that the Jew-imported non-Whites don’t want to accept their Jew-scripted role as “natural allies.” Instead, they regard Jews as supreme exemplars of racist White oppressors. It’s hard to blame them when you see pale-skinned Israelis raining high explosive on dark-skinned Palestinians. And when you see genuine fascists like Itamar Ben-Gvir (born 1976) high in the Israeli government. Ben-Gvir is the current Minister for National Security and heads a party called Otzma Yehudit, “Jewish Power,” which descends directly from the outlawed Judeo-fascist Kach party.
Feisty Judeo-fascist Itamar Ben-Gvir at a Jewish Power rally (the sign says Otzma Yehudit, or “Jewish Power” in Hebrew, with the adjective following the noun)
Until it became too politically embarrassing for him, Ben-Gvir maintained an honored place in his home for a portrait of a Brooklyn-born Israeli doctor called Baruch Goldstein (1956–94), whose early death remains much lamented in Israel and the Jewish Diaspora. Why so? Well, like the murderer-for-Muhammad Mumtaz Qadri in Pakistan, Goldstein was a Martyr with a Machine-Gun. On Purim Day in 1994, when Jews were commemorating a righteous revenge on an ancient anti-Semite, Goldstein was beaten to death by the Arabs who had survived the bullets he sprayed in a crowded mosque, as I described in my article “Fingernails and Fascism.” The title of that article refers to a little-known line in the eulogy delivered by a rabbi called Yaacov Perrin at Goldstein’s funeral. Perrin said: “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”
Itamar Ben-Gvir and the rest of Otzma Yehudit undoubtedly believe the same. The Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu may well believe it too. Netanyahu is certainly a Jewish supremacist, placing Jewish welfare first and Palestinian welfare nowhere. As I said: Can you blame non-Whites in the West for regarding Jews as supreme exemplars of racist White oppressors? I can’t. But there’s something else I can’t do, namely, regard Jews as my “brothers and sisters” in the way urged by Tom Slater. They’re not my brothers and sisters. I’m White and my ancestral religion is Christianity. For decades, Jews in Britain have been central to a war against Whites and Christianity. They’ve engineered endless non-White immigration and organized endless anti-White legislation. For example, Richard Stone, a Jewish doctor like Baruch Goldstein, labored long and hard in the martyr-cult of the Black teenager Stephen Lawrence.
An over-achieving ethnic enricher
As the “Israelophobic” Bobby Vylan has noted in one of his resentment-filled lyrics, St Stephen was murdered by evil White racists in 1993. His parents were part of the so-called “Windrush Generation,” the group of absurdly apothesized and adulated Black immigrants who poured into Britain from the Caribbean after the Second World War. Doreen Lawrence, the martyr’s mother, now has an honored seat in the House of Lords, whence she regularly and righteously rebukes the White British for their racism and maltreatment of her fellow Blacks. But Dame Doreen will not be commenting on an interesting example of ethnic enrichment by an over-achieving fellow Black who was, to judge by his name and age, also part of the Windrush Generation:
The vibrant villain Ryland Headley, an over-achieving ethnic enricher who raped and murdered an elderly White woman in 1967
A 92-year-old man who evaded justice for almost 60 years has been convicted of raping and murdering a woman in Bristol, after a review by a cold case police team and scientists. A jury at Bristol crown court found Ryland Headley guilty of attacking Louisa Dunne, 75, a stranger to him, at her home in the Easton area of the city in June 1967. Headley was caught after Avon and Somerset police’s major crime review team unearthed DNA links between him and the murder scene in what they codenamed Operation Beatle — a nod to the era in which the crime took place.
Officers believe the 58-year gap between the crime and the conviction may be the biggest in modern English policing history and Headley is thought to be the oldest person convicted of murder in the UK. The force is working with the National Crime Agency to look at whether Headley may be responsible for any other unsolved attacks over the years. […] Senior investigating officer Det Insp Dave Marchant said Headley, who was in his 30s when he killed Mrs Dunne, had left “a legacy of misery and pain”. (“Man, 92, convicted of raping and murdering Bristol woman in 1967,” The Guardian, and “Man, 92, guilty of 1967 rape and murder of woman,” BBC News, 30th Jun 2025)
As I predicted in my article “The Wasteland of Windrushistan,” we now know why Louisa Dunne — who was “5ft 3in tall” (160 cm) and “weighed less than seven stone” (45 kg or 98 lbs) — failed to live out her days in calm and serenity, “watching the world go by.” It was thanks to White traitors at the top and the White-hating Jews who controlled those traitors and supplied them with their ideological script. The traitors and the Jews unleashed the “Windrush Generation” on the unwilling ordinary Whites of the United Kingdom, ensuring that Blacks would commit endless violent crimes against ordinary Whites, drain vast sums of money paid in tax by ordinary Whites, and drive huge numbers of ordinary Whites out of the cities that Blacks were enriching with noise, dirt, crime and chaos.
The mud-flood is a blight, not a blessing
That policeman was perfectly correct to say that Ryland Headley left a “legacy of misery and pain.” But the policeman would be wrong to confine that statement to Ryland Headley, who is merely one vibrant villain among millions. In truth, Whites in the West owe a much bigger legacy of much more misery and pain to non-White migration in general. There are the rape-gangs of Pakistani Muslims too. The suicide-bombers and the cartoonist-killing terrorists. The acid-throwers and the machete-swingers. Non-White migration is a curse, not a blessing. And Jews have played a central role in creating that curse and condemning everyone who opposed it. By doing that, Jews have also played a central role in creating the civil wars that are fast approaching across the West.
That’s why I don’t regard Jews as my “brothers and sisters” and why I don’t shake with shock when I see dreadlocked Blacks like Bobby Vylan shouting “Israelophobic” slogans on the BBC. In one way, it’s very funny that the Jews’ “natural allies” have turned out to be Nazi-adjacent. In another, it’s not funny at all. Jews engineered non-White immigration fully intending that “natural allies” of themselves should be natural enemies of Whites. They got the first part wrong and the second part right. Non-Whites are indeed natural enemies of Whites and Western civilization. Jews have deliberately imposed an incalculably huge legacy of misery and pain on the West. That’s why Remigration has to include Jews. Those who hate Whites and harm Whites have to leave the White West.
[1] I’d be interested to see Tom Slater call Bobby Vylan a “cunt” to his face. But I doubt that the dweebish Slater would ever do that.
[2] Bobby Vylan had a Black father and White mother. His Black father seems to have abandoned his child and “baby-momma.”
[3] Or more accurately, as I note later, Brendan’s second thoughts have been had for him by his Jewish puppet-master Frank Furedi.
We haven’t got a Jewish “asylum seeker” problem across the western world today.
We DO have a Muslim, African, Chinese and Hindu mass-immigration problem.
Priorities.
People like you, who deflect from the enemy, are the real problem.
Nigga please. . .
[puts down bacon sandwich, starts typing…]
We haven’t got a Jewish “asylum seeker” problem, my fellow goyim.
We DO have a Muslim, African, Chinese and Hindu mass-immigration problem. And it’s nothing to do with Jews, my fellow goyim. Nothing at all.
Priorities, my fellow goyim. Priorities!
[picks up bacon sandwich, continues eating…]
You have missed the numerical point, Mr Williams.
I do not deny the previous role of immigrant Jews in promoting multi-culturalism, racial egalitarian theory and other disruptive activities.
The hostility of Muslim and other Global South immigrants to Israel may be seen as a compensation or an accidental bonus, but I still regard their own presence, whether Jews like it or not, as unwelcome.
You have actually missed Mr. Williams’ point, Mr. Bannerman. He didn’t miss your point, he just pointed out that your ‘numerical point’ was a deflection. I’m sure he’d fully agree with you that the high level of 3rd world immigration into the western world is an enormous problem, and that there happen to be negligible numbers of jewish asylum seekers. He never claimed otherwise. I’m sure he doesn’t want the 3rd world hordes here any more than you do. But your comment was a misleading attempt at deflection because it zeroed in on the fact there are only a small number of jewish asylum seekers and claimed that because of this, in lieu of the aforementioned mass migration, any focus on the jews was a ‘priority problem.’ This completely misses the point, which is that there is an obvious need to focus on the enablers of the immigration in the first place – as I’m sure you realise, immigrants don’t just teleport into a nation – to get here they have to be allowed (or even encouraged) inside as a matter of policy. Amongst the forces behind the ideology and decisions that have resulted in the admission of such hordes in the first place, both historically and at present, ethnic jews are hugely, hugely over-represented, hence the heavy focus on ethnic jews as the most influential and important culprits behind the disastrous levels of immigraiton into the west (amongst many other problems). If you don’t have any particular idea as to how and why this came to be the case, and why such behavior has proved so inherent to this particular ethnicity (far, far more than any other) throughout history, a good place to start would be the ‘Culture of Critique’ trilogy by Kevin MacDonald, which can be ordered through the shop links at this website. Your comments indicate you are not familiar with the majority of the incisive information provided in these books, although you do at least appear vaguely aware of the historic role jewish immigrants made in shaping immigration policy, which is a start.
1) Jews filled the West with those other groups. Those other groups didn’t fill the West with Jews.
2) Anyone reading your comments can work out that you’re Jewish. Stop LARPing as a White person—it’s embarrassingly transparent.
@ Darles
As I am NOT Jewish by race, religion, affiliation or residence, you just expose yourself as sick or stupid, exemplifying the tragic counter-productive incompetence of some who hate Jews but have no real idea how to combat them.
Thanks for yet again defending Jews from “hate” fellow White person.
I used to look at Spiked occasionally to document the awakening of mainstreamers to the cult of Woke/Wokeism/Wokists. At first I thought it was to the right of the centre but after several later readings, it appears that Spiked is neither left nor right but atypically centrist in its outlook; refusing the overtures of either of the camps beside them. Brenadan O’Neill is adamantly vocal about causes, but I wonder if his ’empathy’ towards Israel is somewhat a ludicrous position to be taking given his posturing and high-horse rhetoric about Covid/Wokeism etc.
If Brendan is intelligent as he surely believes of himself, then why would he espouse a regime which is ruled by megalomaniacs and zealots willing to murder women and children with impunity ?
There is more than a hint of hypocrisy about Brendan O’Neill. You can’t claim to be the champion of human rights when your hobby horse is slaughtering thousands of defenceless humans.
Surely he cannot believe that the thinking public is so blind to his defending the indefensible ?
O’Neill’s Zionist monomania is as bad as some of the ranting anti-Jew jabber here. Otherwise Spiked has some good items. What is it about Them that provokes mutual hysteria?
What it about them that provokes it, you ask? It’s provoked by the widespread and consistently repeated behavior of the ethnic group in question, displayed time and time again throughout history and observed by every nation and people amongst whom they have dwelt. That’s what.
Only to the oblivious or the willfully blind might such a reaction appear to be ‘hysteria’ – to those aware and honest enough, it’s simply a logical recognition of an enormous problem.
Great article.
The Left see Israel as a ‘White colonialist’ project. Jews put so much energy into creating the anti-White golem—which has now turning on its master. It’s served its purpose as the West is now the multicultural hell they wanted.
The rise in anti-woke sentiment directed by Jews is an attempt to deactivate that Golem. They’re walking a tightrope, but they love it.
Not much sign that they “love it” in their own literature.
I’m referencing their inherent desire for risk. “Thrive on it” would be more accurate.
One thing that does please many of them is the gratuitous provision of what they call “tropes” in the form of vicious fantasies that parody effective criticism (of Israel, shechita, the Talmud, usury, Chosen People, &c) and can be used to discredit Gentile patriots and reinforce their lobbying against “hate” speech. I sometimes suspect that clever hasbara-trolls themselves post some of the crazy stuff themselves, precisely for this reason.
Which “trope” did I provide “them” with, fellow White person?
Looking at Mr Bannerman’s exchanges and similar threads, I have to ask what the value, or gain especially to white nationalism, is of posts that say in effect:
1. I personally really hate “jews” a lot.
2. All of them are evil, without exception.
3. None of them are human beings.
4. They control everything.
5. They still eat children at Easter and/or poison wells and/or smell.
6. They invented Christianity to destroy Europeans, and invented Islam to destroy Christians.
7. They plan to kill all white people, or everyone.
8. Jews are so powerful, we can never defeat them.
9. Emma Smith must be one of them, or at any rate mad, asking this question.
Because to “know thy enemy’ is of obvious value to any cause. The conclusions people have drawn from said knowledge explains most of the points on the list. Indeed, many who hold such positions came to them reluctantly. Points 6 and 8 are incorrect, for what it’s worth, and I have no idea about 9 as I don’t know who you are.
There’s nothing ‘white’ about jews. An absolutely ridiculous claim. These beasts without souls are no skin to us. This minstrel shows more morality than supposed ‘pro-whites’ who tolerate yids.
Curiously it is some of the Kabbalist Jews who say that Gentiles are “beasts without souls”. Would you say that Spinoza, Brahms, Karl Landsteiner, Otto Weininger, Gilad Atzmon or Gerard Menuhin, for example, were beasts?
Hitler observed that Jews notoriously quarrel with one another, but failed to realise that what alone unites and empowers them is the perception, imagination or allegation of an existential collective threat.
Do some serious research, and start with Dan Cohn-Sherbok’s “The Paradox of Antisemitism”.