George Orwell wasn’t a saint and wasn’t infallible. But he got some big things right. Animal Farm (1945) and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) are classics of political satire, analysis and prophecy. Orwell also got some small things right. For example, in his pioneering essay on “Boys’ Weeklies,” he said that a magazine called The Magnet had “a really first-rate character in the fat boy, Billy Bunter.”
Myopic and mocked
Billy Bunter is indeed one of the great comic characters of English literature. He was launched in 1908 by an astonishingly prolific author called Charles Hamilton (1876-1961) (writing as Frank Richards), but today his stories have something that his creator and early readers could never have foreseen: a thrill of the forbidden. The stories are very politically incorrect. Bunter is a myopic, morbidly obese schoolboy who is mocked for his greed, dishonesty, selfishness, stupidity and sloth. And worse than mocked: as Orwell said, “boots and canes are constantly thudding” against “his tight trousers.” Here is a typical encounter between Bunter and his fellow schoolboys:
[A]t that moment Nugent opened the cupboard to lift out the cake. There was no cake to be lifted out. Nugent stared at the spot where a cake had been, and where now only a sea of crumbs met the view. …
“Bunter, you podgy pirate!” exclaimed Harry Wharton. … “Where’s that cake?”
“How should I know? I never even looked into the cupboard, and I never saw any cake when I looked in, either—”
“I-I-I say, you fellows, it wasn’t me,” yelled Bunter. “I-I expect you put it somewhere else. It wasn’t there when I ate it—I mean, when I didn’t eat it—If you think I scoffed that cake, I can jolly well say—whoooop! Whoooop! Yarooooh!” (Bunter Comes for Christmas, 1959)
Frank Richards’ “first rate character” Billy Bunter
It’s not sophisticated humour, but Charles Hamilton was a skilful writer and entertained millions of readers for many decades. I particularly like Bunter’s self-refuting denials: “The cake wasn’t there when I ate it.” Bunter is stupid, so he exposes himself even as he indignantly exculpates himself.
A newspaper that refutes itself
But you don’t need to go to old children’s literature to find self-refuting denials and self-exposing exculpators. The British newspaper known as the Guardian supposedly exists on a far higher intellectual and literary plane than the Magnet, but its pages are full of Bunteresque self-exposure. For example, in May 2019 it ran an indignant story about Black criminals being deported to Jamaica. I think the headline was Bunteresque: “‘Things are so bad even the police are scared’: deportees live in fear in Jamaica.”
The Guardian knows that its good-thinking readers will not draw any heretical conclusions from that self-accusing headline. Instead, they will feel angry and dismayed that vulnerable Blacks are being deported from the magic dirt of Britain to the tragic dirt of Jamaica. However, I’m a bad-thinker, so I’ll point out the obvious. If Jamaica is such a violent and lawless country, how can immigration from Jamaica be good for Britain? It can’t be, and it’s inevitable that Jamaican immigrants and their descendants will be over-represented as violent criminals in Britain. That story in the Guardian is full of Black criminals complaining about being deported to live among their own kind in a nation governed by their own culture.
Fringe fathers and tortured schoolgirls
Obviously, the Black criminals don’t like this. They want to return to the still mostly White nation of Britain, where life is much less dangerous and there are lots of Whites to prey on. The Guardian carefully avoids the question of precisely what crimes the Black deportees have committed and instead tugs at its readers’ heart-strings with claims about their suffering. One criminal “is desperately missing his two children in the UK,” we are told. But men from Jamaica and other Black countries are notorious for fathering children and then declining to supervise or provide for their upbringing. In 2006, a gang of Black criminals subjected a White English schoolgirl called Mary-Ann Leneghan to prolonged rape and torture, then cut her throat and stabbed her to death in a public park. It turned out that the leader of the gang, Adrian Thomas, was the son of a feckless Black called Tony Thomas, who expressed his contrition at being a “fringe father” to his string of illegitimate children.
If the wishes of the White majority in the supposed democracy of Britain had been followed, there would never have been any immigration from Jamaica or any other Black country. And Mary-Ann Leneghan would never have suffered that horrible death. And many thousands of other Whites would not have been murdered, raped, robbed or assaulted by Blacks. Charles Hamilton was an astonishingly prolific White author. Delroy Easton Grant is an astonishingly prolific Black rapist who specialized in attacking elderly White women after emigrating to Britain from Jamaica.
From innocence to sickness
The Guardian is wringing its hands about Black “deportees liv[ing] in fear in Jamaica,” but you can be sure that some or even most of the deportees have committed rape and other violent crimes against Whites, including attacks on homosexuals. After all, Jamaica is almost as notorious for its homophobia as for its murder-total, which is almost as high as Britain’s despite Jamaica being a much less populous country. When Jamaicans come to Britain, they bring their violence, “rape culture” and “homophobia” with them. Fortunately, a small number of Jamaican criminals have been deported to their own nation to live among their own kind. And the supposedly feminist and pro-LGBTQ+ Guardian wants those criminals back in Britain to carry on where they left off.
Billy Bunter was an innocent joke. The Guardian is a sick joke. And the joke gets even sicker when it comes to a politician whom the Guardian helped put into power back in 1997. While he was in office, Tony Blair appointed a Jewish immigration minister, Barbara Roche, to preside over unprecedented levels of immigration from the Third World. Huge numbers of Blacks, Muslims and other non-Whites began to pour into Britain and have never stopped. Blair has meanwhile left office and become a very wealthy man. But he’s still eager for the spotlight and in early May 2019 the Guardian hosted an event entitled “The new populism: In conversation with Tony Blair.” Yes, the shabbos goy Blair was going to explain why White voters across the Western world are abandoning the old parties and turning to populist “extremists” like Matteo Salvini and Nigel Farage. But the publicity for the Guardian’s event with Blair contained some Bunteresque self-accusation:
One ticket per person and tickets are strictly non-transferable. Government issued photographic proof of ID must be shown and must match the name on the ticket. If you cannot provide this proof you will be refused entry.
By purchasing a ticket you acknowledge that there will be strict security arrangements and that we will be conducting security checks of clothing, bags and other items as determined by us. Large bags must be checked in the cloakroom.
Attendees will be informed of the venue during the weekend prior to the event. (The new populism: In conversation with Tony Blair, The Guardian, May 2019)
Tony Blair, war criminal, traitor and shabbos goy
Large numbers of people want to kill Tony Blair, you see, because he has been central to the mass slaughter and nation-wrecking of hugely expensive wars undertaken by neo-conservatives on behalf of Israel. In other words, it’s not Salvini or Farage who are extremists, but Blair and other shabbos goyim. Populism is a rational response to the behaviour of politicians like Blair. And Blair vastly expanded the population of Muslims in Britain who now want to kill him. But he’s rich enough to afford the very best security, unlike the children who arrived at a pop-concert in Manchester on 22nd May 2017. Some of those children were then murdered by a British-born suicide-bomber called Salman Abedi, whose Libyan parents had been “granted asylum” in Britain under a so-called “conservative” government.
Defending Israel, betraying Britain
As I pointed out in “Manchester Malady,” if Abedi’s parents had sought asylum in Blair’s beloved land of Israel, they would have been refused point-blank. If Abedi himself had tried to visit Israel before his suicide-bombing, he would have denied entry, because he was on a terrorist watchlist by then. Instead, Abedi stayed in Britain and White children died in horrible ways because of policies enacted by those great Friends of Israel Tony Blair and John Major. White children have also suffered horrendously at the hands of Muslim rape-gangs in towns like Rotherham, Huddersfield and Telford. These non-White rapists are in Britain thanks to the leftist love of open borders, and their crimes went unchallenged for so long thanks to leftist lies about racism and Islamophobia.
I hope that Tony Blair, Barbara Roche and other traitorous or goyophobic politicians will go on trial one day for their crimes against the White British. Among much else, I’d like to see Blair explain a claim he made in the foreword to a fatuous report issued by The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. Under the portentous title of “The Glue That Binds: Integration in a Time of Populism,” Blair wrote: “In this report, we make it clear that there is a duty to integrate, to accept the rules, laws and norms of our society that all British people hold in common and share.” But why is there a “duty” to “accept” these “rules, laws and norms” if “all British people” already “hold [them] in common and share [them]”? Tony Blair is like Billy Bunter squeaking: “The cake wasn’t there when I ate it!” Blair is squeaking: “Muslims must accept norms that they already accept!”
Muslims vs the LGBTQ community
How will Blair explain his own words when he’s on trial for the capital crime of treason? It will be fascinating to see. It will also be fascinating to see him comment on this tough message he issued in 2006: “Our tolerance is part of what makes Britain, Britain. Conform to it; or don’t come here.” If that message was honest, Blair had some certain means of removing or reforming the people who came here and didn’t conform. Otherwise his words were hollow. The message wasn’t honest, of course, and Blair’s words were completely hollow. In 2019, it is abundantly clear that Britain contains huge numbers of non-Whites who aren’t “conforming” to Britain’s famous tradition of “tolerance.”
For example, Dave Thompson, the police chief of Britain’s second city of Birmingham, has recently lamented the way in which schools in the city “have been subject to protests by parents concerning the schools’ curriculum on equality.” To be more precise, the parents are Muslims who don’t believe in “equality” for homosexuals, lesbians and transsexuals and don’t want their children to be indoctrinated in the joys of LGBTQ culture. They’re attacking a pro-LGBTQ course called “No Outsiders,” because they’re happy for the LGBTQ community to be outsiders. Police Chief Thompson is distressed by this and issued some Bunteresque commentary in the Birmingham Mail:
As a citizen of this city, I have observed these protests and the rhetoric around them with increasing concern. West Midlands Police values and celebrates the diversity of this area. We believe the strength of this city is in tolerant and diverse communities.
This week I will march with LGBT staff and communities in Birmingham Pride and next week I will fast with Muslim colleagues and communities as they mark Ramadan. Both are possible to celebrate and respect in this amazing and diverse city. Sadly this is not the image of Birmingham that these events are projecting around the country and the world.
It is very important all those involved in the dispute at Anderton Park recognise the adverse impact this is having on the reputation of the city, broader cohesion and most importantly the children at this school. (Police chief calls for end to LGBT protests at Anderton Park Primary School, The Birmingham Mail, 21st May 2019)
Let’s review Chief Thompson’s commentary. On the one hand, he says that West Midlands Police “values and celebrates” the Muslims who add to the “strength of this city” with their vibrancy and help make it an “amazing and diverse” place. At the same time, Muslims are responsible for certain “events” that are “projecting” the wrong “image of Birmingham … around the country and the world.” These “events” are having an “adverse impact” on the “reputation of the city” and on “broader cohesion.”
In other words, Muslims are attacking the very values that their presence enhances. At least, the police chief says that their presence enhances them. He’s lying and blowing smoke, of course. And so is the Birmingham Mail in its headline: “Police chief calls for end to LGBT protests.” Muslims aren’t engaged in “LGBT protests” but in “anti-LGBT protests.” The police chief is also lying about how much Birmingham has been blessed by “diversity.” If you read the Birmingham Mail regularly, again and again you’ll see non-White faces accompanying stories about violent crime. Here are some of the non-White faces that have recently appeared there:
“Amazing and diverse”: non-White criminals in Birmingham
And here are the stories accompanying the faces:
- Bournville College students locked up for machete gang attack which left victim pouring with blood
- “Danger to women” — evil thug strangled, choked and STABBED girlfriend and it wasn’t the first time
- Gang jailed for 94 YEARS after horrific machete raids on shops
- The battered-faced thug who threatened to slit shopkeeper’s throat as he held eight-inch blade to her neck
- “That’s justice, bro” — killers who shot man in car amid drugs feud FIGHT in dock as they’re jailed for life
- Refugee jailed for robbing semi-naked escort at knifepoint after hotel rendezvous
Those stories are replete with violence, but also rich with irony. Take the story about “Bournville College students” and their machete attack. Bournville is a new district in Birmingham famous for its chocolate factory, which was founded by the Quaker confectioners of the Cadbury family. High-IQ, high-trust Whites created a complex industry exporting its wares all over the world. Then non-Whites arrived in Bournville and created another kind of industry:
William Dudley, prosecuting, said [Sadiki] Richardson then brandished a machete he took from a rucksack and [Delayni] Woodcock used it to strike the victim repeatedly on his lower legs and knees causing “severe traumatic injuries”. He said one of the blows was so severe the blade jammed in his knee bone and Richardson had difficulty prising it out. (Bournville College students locked up for machete gang attack which left victim pouring with blood, The Birmingham Mail, 17th May 2019)
The non-White Sadiki Richardson and Delayni Woodcock were “both 16 at the time.” That is, they were schoolboys. The White nation of Britain was once entertained by stories about the fictional schoolboy Billy Bunter, who stole cakes and made fatuous excuses. Nowadays Britain is appalled by stories about real schoolboys who hack people with machetes, stab them with knives, and spray them with acid. Meanwhile, fatuous excuses are made by politicians and police chiefs. As I’ve pointed out before, we live in a “Land of Lies.” But the lies will not last for ever. Nor will the liars.