Preying in Public: An Acceleration in the Insidious Advance of Islam

Two things told me decades ago that Islam was going to cause big trouble in Britain. The first thing was my eyes, the second was my ears. Back in the early 1990s I moved to a new town and began to meet ordinary Muslims properly for the first time, to observe their behavior and hear their opinions. I was a liberal in the classic sense back then. I naïvely (and narcissistically) believed in freedom, tolerance, and goodwill, in extending a warm welcome to the Muslim migrants who were enriching the stale pale nation of Britain with their vibrant culture, customs and cuisine. Yes, I was an ardent adherent of Enlightenment values, sure that rationalism, science and secularism could and would create a brighter future for us all.

Another kind of Enlightenment: Islam is an evil and abusive religion

And so it was startling for me to be told by one perfectly ordinary Muslim, with a smile and an accompanying chop-chop gesture, that he used to vote for Margaret Thatcher in the hope that she would introduce judicial amputation — hand-chopping for thieves. This revelation was another kind of Enlightenment. And not a comfortable one. I realized that he had absolutely no understanding of British politics, culture or history and didn’t accept any tenet of liberalism. The same was true of the Muslim who proudly told me that the Koran had prophesied AIDS as a well-merited punishment for homosexuals and that the Jews too were destined to taste Allah’s wrath. Having met these two, I was less startled to see an English-language newsletter praising the Taliban in another Muslim’s house. And to hear that sermons in local mosques echoed the newsletter’s praise of the Taliban and the Taliban’s robust, no-nonsense application of true Islamic values.

A bovine blessing

I wasn’t so much startled as disturbed to hear how closely related Muslim husbands and wives often were, and to see how children’s health and intelligence were often harmed by such consanguineous marriages (as I didn’t then know to call them). These were all Muslims from the state of Gujarat in Hindu-majority India, but I didn’t see any significance in their origins until I received more enlightenment from a Muslim. He’d been a tailor back in Gujarat and told me that one day he’d been working in the open air at the entrance to his shop. A roaming cow had urinated copiously on the street and a neighboring Hindu shopkeeper had scooped up a palmful of the urine and, as a blessing and for good luck, had sprinkled some on the Muslim tailor’s head. Cows and all their by-products are sacred in Hinduism, but not in Islam. The tailor was disgusted, he told me, but had accepted the noisome blessing with good grace. He didn’t say why he’d been accepted it like that, but he didn’t need to. I knew that Gujarat was majority Hindu and that Hindus respond robustly to Muslim provocations. In other words, if Muslims riot and kill five Hindus, Hindus will riot and kill fifty Muslims.

“Massive bottles of cow urine” on sale next to food in London thanks to mass migration from India (see Metro article)

Muslims wouldn’t riot over a palmful of piss, but I sensed that the Muslim tailor had known he was being subjected to a kind of tolerance test. The Hindu neighbor who sprinkled the urine on the tailor’s head was quite possibly asserting Hindu dominance over a minority. The message was: “Tolerate this or else.” That story from the former tailor made me realize that Muslim migrants from Hindu-majority India were still wary of provoking the White majority in Britain. They had long memories of majority violence back in India and kept their heads down. But that didn’t mean they respected British laws or customs. It was also enlightening for me to see how readily they sent their children back to Gujarat for extended holidays during school-time — and how the children would leave speaking fluent English and return speaking broken English. This wasn’t good for the children and their education, but it was good for maintaining the cohesion of the “community,” that is, for ensuring that Muslims remained separate and distinct from the White majority.

Multi-faith = Muslim: the suicide-cult of leftism facilitates its own destruction

My education in Islam, which had begun by meeting Muslims from Hindu-majority Gujarat, carried on when I got to know a Muslim from Muslim-majority Pakistan. That is, he was born in Britain but he was mentally and ideologically from Pakistan, with all its Muslim supremacism and arrogance. The Gujaratis had been respectable; the Pakistani was rotten. But not anomalously so. It was startling again to be told by him how Pakistani Muslims in Britain celebrated the sacred Muslim festival of Eid with strippers and alcohol. And it was disturbing to be told how he had deliberately impregnated and abandoned a middle-class White girlfriend in order — and these are his own words — “to fuck her life up” with an illegitimate child. He was open and unashamed about cheating in exams, about exploiting Muslim networks for corrupt ends, about his recreational violence, and about his promiscuity and drug-taking. Looking back at what he said I realize now that he was sometimes talking about rape-gangs in his natal city of Manchester. The concept of Muslim rape-gangs wasn’t familiar back then, however, so I didn’t realize the full and ugly significance of what he was saying about having sex with very young White girls.

Home-grown horror

But I did realize then that he was full of rage and resentment towards White Britain. And that his own dishonesty and corruption were obviously routine among Pakistanis. Inter alia, he introduced me to a popular method of getting free national and international calls on public telephones. It was popular among Pakistanis, at least, but I didn’t want to use it myself. After all, what happens to a society where people exploit public services like that? And to a society where large numbers of people think and act like this Pakistani acquaintance of mine? As a liberal I didn’t answer those questions fully and honestly back then, but as an ex-liberal I can do so now. What happens? You get Pakistan rather than Britain, the Third World rather than the First. This Pakistani acquaintance was also an enthusiastic supporter of any Muslim or other Third-World group that fought the West. Although he was openly hostile to Jews and Israel, he was nevertheless a big fan of the ugly Jewish comedian Mark Thomas, because Thomas is anti-White and anti-Western. Yes, my Pakistani acquaintance made me realize that Britain would sooner or later experience “home-grown” Muslim terrorism.

Ugly and anti-white Jewish comedian Mark Thomas (image from Wikipedia)

And so I wasn’t surprised at all when three Pakistani Muslims and a Jamaican convert carried out suicide-bombings in London on July 7, 2005. By then my eyes and ears had overcome my old ideology. In other words, I’d abandoned liberalism and adopted realism. I wasn’t naïve and narcissistic any more about Islam or racial differences. That’s why I wasn’t surprised or puzzled by the suicide-bombings. Instead, I understood them. Like my angry and resentful acquaintance in the early 1990s, the Pakistani suicide-bombers were born in Britain but not bred in Britain. They were from a Pakistani colony, a Third-World enclave on British soil that had now reproduced all the pathologies of home, from corruption and cousin marriage to child-rape and suicide-bombing.

Richly meriting violent death

Well, not quite all the pathologies: Britain had to wait until 2016 for another essential and authentic rite of Pakistani culture to be celebrated on British soil. It was the butchery of a blasphemer, an Ahmadi Muslim called Asad Shah who was stabbed and stomped to death in Glasgow by a Sunni Muslim called Tanveer Ahmed. What had Shah done? He’d denied the Khatm-e-Nabuwwat or “Finality of Prophethood.” That is, he’d claimed powers of prophecy for himself and contradicted the orthodox Muslim idea that Muhammad is the final, culminating Prophet sent by Allah. Therefore Asad Shah richly merited violent death, just as the Pakistani politician Salman Taseer had done in 2010 when he championed a Christian woman unjustly sentenced to death for blasphemy and proposed the amending of Pakistan’s harsh anti-blasphemy laws. Taseer was machine-gunned to death in 2011 by one of his own bodyguards, Mumtaz Qadri, who then calmly accepted arrest, trial, and execution. He had become a ghazi, or hero, to mainstream Muslim groups in both Pakistan and Britain by murdering Salman Taseer, and became a shahid, or martyr, when he was executed. And ghazi-shahid Mumtaz Qadri in Pakistan directly inspired Tanveer Ahmed in Britain.

The hero and the heretic: Muslims in Britain salute Tanveer Ahmed for murdering Asad Shah

Like his hero Qadri, Tanveer Ahmed had preyed in public, brutally murdering a fellow British citizen in broad daylight over a disagreement about theology. As you’d expect, leftists and libertarians quickly sent Asad Shah’s murder down the memory-hole, because it revealed toxic truths about the intolerance and barbarity of perfectly mainstream Muslims. But the murder took place under a Conservative government and the Conservatives are famously the party of law and order. So did Conservatives ensure that Asad Shah was permanently and robustly commemorated? Not at all. They too soon forgot his murder. But the same Conservative government did add Stephen Lawrence Day to Britain’s religious calendar in memory of the Black schoolboy murdered by evil White racists way back in 1993. I say “religious calendar” because Lawrence is effectively a saint in a leftist martyr-cult dedicated to preaching lies about White villainy and non-White virtue.

Leftists gave Stephen Lawrence an anti-white martyr-cult, but soon forgot Asad Shah

By supporting that leftist martyr-cult, the Conservatives proved that they too are thoroughly leftist and anti-White. That’s why they made no attempt to commemorate Asad Shah. Unlike the murder of Stephen Lawrence, the murder of Assad Shah had genuine significance and revealed genuine pathologies in the community whence the murderer emerged. Tanveer Ahmed preyed in public and his victim should have become a household name. A decade later in 2026, the Conservatives are noisily rebuking Muslims not for preying in public but for merely praying in public. Sadiq Khan, the inbred-looking Muslim mayor of London, joined public prayers for the end of Ramadhan in world-famous Trafalgar Square. The prayers were preceded by the adhan, the wailing Muslim call to prayer that blasts out from more and more mosques in Britain and the rest of the West. A Conservative spokesman called Nick Timothy issued a robust response on Twitter:

Too many are too polite to say this.

But mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination.

The adhan — which declares there is no god but allah [sic] and Muhammad is his messenger — is, when called in a public place, a declaration of domination.

Perform these rituals in mosques if you wish. But they are not welcome in our public places and shared institutions.

And given their explicit repudiation of Christianity they certainly do not belong in our churches and cathedrals.

I am not suggesting everybody at Trafalgar Square last night is an Islamist. But the domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook.

Trafalgar Square belongs to all of us. It is a national memorial to our independence and our salvation.

Last night was not like a televised football match or a St Patrick’s Day celebration.

It was an act of domination and therefore division.

It shouldn’t happen again. (Tweet by Nick Timothy, 17th March 2026)

Sadiq Khan and other inbred-looking Muslim mayors in the YooKay

I think Timothy told the truth: public prayer by Muslims is indeed a “declaration of domination.” They didn’t do it when they first arrived in Britain, but are confident and arrogant enough to do it now. The insidious advance of Islam is accelerating. That Timothy told the truth is confirmed by the leftist reaction to what he said. Leftists love lies and hate the truth, so they’ve reacted with wails about “Islamophobia” and “racism.” Keir Starmer has demanded that Kemi Badenoch “denounce” Timothy’s comments and sack him, but Badenoch, the Black Nigerian Tory leader, has refused, saying that he was “defending British values.” But why didn’t the Tories defend “British values” after Asad Shah’s murder in 2016, when a Muslim preyed in public in a much more brutal and blatant “declaration of domination”? In part, it’s because the Tories have no real concern for “defending British values.” No, what really motivates them is defending Jewish interests. Back in 2016, Jews in Britain still overwhelmingly saw Muslims as “natural allies” against the White and historically Christian majority.

How Jews have seen Muslims as “natural allies” in their war on the White West

But since the Hamas attacks on Israel in October 2023, more and more Jews have realized that they’ve created a golem by importing and privileging so many Muslims across the West. The golem is an artificial monster from Jewish folklore, created by a Jewish magician to defend Jews but turning against them in the end. Now that enough rich and powerful Jews see Muslims as golems, the thoroughly Zionist Tories are prepared to criticize Muslim behavior. But Labour, although also long subverted by Jewish money, can’t risk alienating the Muslims who have voted overwhelmingly Labour in the past and who dominate so many Labour councils. This pandering won’t help Labour, because their support for Israel’s brutal war in Gaza means that Muslims are defecting to the even more anti-White and pro-Muslim Green Party under its gay Jewish leader Zack Polanski. But there’s laughter amid this lunatic leftism. I certainly laughed when I read this classic taqiyya about the prayers in Trafalgar Square:

However, scholars said [Timothy’s] interpretation of the adhan was wrong. Qari Assam, an imam at one of the largest mosques in Britain who advised Theresa May’s government on measures to combat Islamophobia, said it was not a declaration of control but “a simple call to worship — an invitation”.

He said: “To frame such acts of devotion as threatening is to misunderstand the very essence of worship. It also risks singling out Muslims for practising what others are freely encouraged to do. This is the challenge that British Muslims are experiencing — they are singled out and discriminated against, fuelling demonisation and anti-Muslim hostility towards Muslims.” (“Starmer claims Tory party has ‘problem with Muslims’ after Nick Timothy tweet,” The Guardian, 18th March 2026)

And what is taqiyya? It’s the Muslim term for “religious deception,” practised to conceal one’s true beliefs and motives from the kaffirs or infidels. Qari Assam is slathering smarm and blowing smoke, because he knows perfectly well that the adhan isn’t a “simple call to prayer.” It’s a declaration of dominance for the ears just as massed ranks of praying Muslims are a declaration of dominance for the eyes. Like that Hindu sprinkling cow-piss on a Muslim’s head in Gujarat, the Muslims in Trafalgar Square were declaring: “Tolerate this or else.” However, Hinduism hadn’t been a very militant or domineering faith before the 1980s. Hindus wanted to keep Muslims in their place, but didn’t want to imitate the habitual aggression and intolerance of Islam. When Hindus demolished the old Ayodhya Mosque in 1992, claiming it had been built on the site of a temple to the god Ram, it was a sign that Hinduism and Hindu parties like the BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party or Indian People’s Party) were indeed starting to imitate Islam. Hindus had used their eyes and ears and concluded that imitation is the only way to compete successfully with homegrown Islam and India’s Muslim neighbor Pakistan.

Chuck the Cuck, head of the Church of England, schmoozes Muslims and Jews

Christianity in the West will have to learn the same lesson, because the suicide-cult of leftism certainly won’t. The traitorous leaders of the official churches are all leftist, of course, so they side with Muhammad and Islam, not with Jesus Christ and Christianity. But more and more ordinary Christians are undertaking the same journey as I did in the early 1990s. Like me, they’re realizing that two of the senses are much more reliable guides to Islam than narcissistic leftist fantasies about Islam. As Jesus himself said: “Blessed are your eyes, for they see: and your ears, for they hear.” (Matthew 13:16)