This article will be brought to you by the letter “M.” It will feature meteor-malefactors, malign monarchs, and moral masturbation. First up: meteor-malefactors. That’s the term I give to criminals whose serious misdeeds flash through the media like a meteor before disappearing into oblivion. Why does this happen? It’s very simple: because meteor-malefactors reveal the toxic truth rather than reinforcing leftist lies. Let’s look at two of the worst crimes ever committed on British soil. They involved the prolonged suffering and exceptionally brutal murders of schoolchildren. And they were inspired by two forms of hate that leftists pretend to take very, very seriously: misogyny and racism.
Mary-Ann Leneghan and Kriss Donald, White victims of non-White savagery
But the murders of Mary-Ann Leneghan and Kriss Donald were forgotten long ago by the leftist media. This might seem puzzling, when you consider, for example, that Mary-Ann Leneghan was the victim of a gang of vilely misogynistic men whose crimes were supremely horrible examples of rape-culture and patriarchal barbarism:
[The surviving victim] described how she and Mary-Ann [Leneghan], her friend of 10 years, had been abducted and forced into the boot of a car as they sat in the car park of the Wallingford Arms in Reading, Berkshire on May 6 last year . She said they were taken to Room 19 of Abbey House Hotel in the city where they were beaten with a metal pole, ordered to strip, forced to perform oral sex, raped, and had boiling sugared water thrown on them.
She said the pair were shown guns and a knife, constantly told they were going to be killed and heard that they would be taken to Prospect Park in Reading. During the first day she hardly flinched as she recounted the graphic details without being hidden by a screen. But today she wept as she told how, as she was raped by a man wearing white jogging bottoms, another man said: “We are ready to go now, let’s leave these bitches now, come on let’s do it.”
She told the jury that she understood this phrase to mean “the final stage, that we were going to die, that they were going to kill us.” She said she, together with Mary-Ann, was taken out of the boot of the car and forced, stumbling and wiping blood from her head, across the park. She said the pair had been ordered to kneel on the ground side by side and were told to put pillow cases over their heads by two men, one wearing a bandana over the lower half of his face and the man with the white jogging bottoms.
With the six defendants just feet away Mary-Ann’s father sat with his hand over the mouth as the girl continued. Asked by prosecutor Richard Latham QC, what happened next she paused for around 30 seconds before looking straight ahead at the jury and saying “she [Mary-Ann Leneghan] was stabbed”. The court was told that the knife-man had been the man with the bandana and asked where on Mary-Ann’s body the man had put the knife she said: “Her upper body, her chest, her breasts, everything. She was asking ‘please not there, please not there’ whatever area she was referring to, and crying and pleading,” she said.
She told how the man with the bandana got angry saying words to the effect of “shut up”. She said that Mary-Ann then fell in a ball on the ground but the stabbing did not stop. “He got more angry because she wouldn’t sit up, he was telling her to sit up because he wanted to slit her throat. … He was stabbing and then she fell,” she said. “They said something about wanting her to die slowly,” she added, before she broke down in tears. … (Friend weeps over Mary-Ann murder, The Daily Mail, 20th January 2006)
In 1993 an unlucky, mercifully quick and very unusual murder was committed by a gang of “white racists” against an ugly Black schoolboy called Stephen Lawrence. Ever since then, the murder has been endlessly revisited by leftists in articles, editorials, documentaries, dramas, and academic studies. In 2018 the ugly shabbos shiksa Theresa May added Stephen Lawrence Day to Britain’s official calendar. But the far worse murder of Mary-Ann Leneghan — which was prolonged, premeditated and viciously sadistic — was swiftly forgotten by leftists.
Why so? Well, her murder was perfect for the creation of a leftist martyr-cult except for one thing: she and her rapist-murderers were the wrong color. She was White and her rapist-murderers consisted of five Blacks and one Albanian “asylum-seeker.” In other words, unlike the murder of Stephen Lawrence, her murder couldn’t be used to promote the leftist lie that villainous Whites are a constant threat to the lives and well-being of virtuous non-Whites. On the contrary, it revealed the truth: that non-Whites, and Blacks in particular, commit far more and far worse violence against Whites than vice versa, even when those non-Whites are still far fewer in number than Whites. That’s why the Black savages who tortured and killed Mary-Ann Leneghan were meteor-malefactors. Their horrible crimes flashed through the leftist media and then vanished forever.
Singh Something Simple
So did the horrible crimes of the Pakistani Muslim gang that kidnapped, set on fire, and stabbed to death the fifteen-year-old Scottish schoolboy Kriss Donald, who died for no other reason than that he was White. It was another meteor-murder committed by more meteor-malefactors, because it couldn’t be used to promote the leftist lie of White villainy and non-White virtue. But criminals don’t have to commit horrific crimes like those to be sent into oblivion by the left. Let’s move from the sickening to the ridiculous and meet another meteor-malefactor: an ethnic enricher called Jaswant Singh Chail. Luckily for the left, he didn’t succeed in killing the elderly White woman he wanted to kill. If he had succeeded, even the left wouldn’t have been able to send the murder into speedy oblivion. This is because the elderly White woman in question was called Queen Elizabeth II. On Christmas Day 2021, the bumbling and incompetent Chail tried to enter Windsor Castle and kill her with a crossbow. In a video he recorded beforehand, he announced: “I will attempt to assassinate Elizabeth, Queen of the Royal Family. This is revenge for those who have died in the 1919 Jallianwala Bagh massacre. It is also revenge for those who have been killed, humiliated and discriminated on because of their race.”
Jaswant Singh Chail, the wannabe anti-racist avenger and assassin of Queen Elizabeth II
If Chail had succeeded in assassinating the Queen, the left might have had to face some uncomfortable questions about the way it incites non-Whites into violence against Whites with constant lying propaganda about “racism.” He didn’t succeed and so the left turned him into a meteor-malefactor. But then so did the cuckservative right, because Chail’s misdeeds also exposed their lies. If he’d been a Muslim, I’m sure that conmen like Mark Steyn and Douglas Murray would have given a lot more publicity to what he tried to do. But Chail is a Sikh, member of a so-called model minority, so he exposed a truth that conmen and cuckservatives don’t want to face: that all non-Whites are bad for the West. Yes, some groups are much worse than others, but none of them should be here and all of them are being used by the left and its Jewish generals in their war on the West.
Waging war on Whites
And in their war on the White working-class. Which brings me to some interesting details in Chail’s farcical attempt on the Queen’s life:
He was spotted by a royal protection officer in a private section of the castle grounds just after 08:10 GMT on 25 December 2021. The officer was at a gate, leading to the monarch’s private apartments. Chail, who was unemployed at the time but had worked for the Co-op supermarket, had climbed into the grounds using a nylon rope ladder, and had already been there for about two hours.
He was wearing a hood and a mask, and was described as “like something out of a vigilante movie”. The officer took out his Taser, and asked him: “Morning, can I help, mate?” Chail replied: “I am here to kill the Queen.” The protection officer immediately told Chail to drop the crossbow, get on his knees, and put his hands on his head. Chail complied and then said again: “I am here to kill the Queen.” (Man admits treason charge over Queen crossbow threat, BBC News, 3rd February 2023)
The royal protection officer used the language of the White working-class, probably because he is a member of the White working-class. Either way, he and his comrades were no doubt very pleased with the cool and professional way he responded to that threat to the monarch whom he had sworn to serve and protect. But if the officer had truly understood the political situation in Britain, he would have realized that his oaths had been rendered null and void by the Queen’s own behavior. After Chail said, “I am here to kill the Queen,” the officer should have said: “Be my guest, mate” and then guided him to his target.
Assassination at the hands of a deranged non-White would have been no more than Elizabeth II deserved for her decades-long betrayal of her people, her nation, and her religion. As I pointed out in my article “Elizabeth the Evil,” she was no great intellect but she played to perfection the role of judas-goat, serving as a figurehead of false continuity and calm as Britain was led into the slaughterhouse by Jews and leftists. She was a malign monarch, betraying her coronation oaths as, decade after decade, violent and destructive non-Whites with alien faiths flooded in to prey on and parasitize her White subjects. Elizabeth II was a traitor, sitting comfortably in luxurious palaces under 24-hour protection as White girls were raped by Muslims in Rotherham and elderly White women were raped by a gerontophile Black in London. But those rapes, horrible as they have been, constitute only a tiny fraction of the violence and misery inflicted on Whites by non-Whites since the coronation of Elizabeth II in 1953.
Now Britain is preparing for the coronation of a new monarch and a new traitor. He is officially known as Charles III, but I prefer to call him Chuck the Cuck. Like his mother, he has lived in luxury, decade after decade, and done nothing to defend his White subjects or Christianity against the predation of non-Whites and their alien religions. Indeed, he’s surpassed her in groveling allegiance to the ideology of minority worship created and enforced by Jews. She was a shabbos shiksa and he is a shabbos goy. As Israel Shahak pointed out in his fascinating (and disturbing) book Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years (1994), Jews have traditionally followed a rule of unrelenting hostility and disdain towards gentiles. But that rule is suspended in the case of kings and other powerful figures who might be useful for Jews. And so Chuck the Cuck has been showered with sycophancy by Britain’s Jews, but has been too stupid to understand that it is self-serving, not sincere. He’s also been unable to read the dire warnings of history. It is entirely possible that the Jews who funded Oliver Cromwell were responsible for the execution of Chuck the Cuck’s ancestor Charles I in 1649. It would have been Jewish vengeance for their expulsion from England in 1290 by Edward I, who favored protecting his Christian subjects over pandering to gold-hungry Jews.
Jews were certainly responsible for the death of Chuck the Cuck’s relative Tsar Nicholas II, who was slaughtered with his wife and children by the Bolsheviks in 1918. The Bolshevik government was dominated by Jews and the chief executioner of the Romanov family was a Jew called Yakov Yurosky. If Chuck the Cuck lost his power and symbolical importance, he would soon see the genuine Jewish attitude towards goyim. As it is, he basks in Jewish sycophancy and steadfastly follows an anti-White Jewish agenda of minority-worship. Chuck the Cuck isn’t supposed to interfere in politics, but he ignores that rule when he has narcissism to feed and virtue to signal. The present Conservative government has recently begun pretending that it is ready to get tough about the endless flow of mostly young and mostly male migrants illegally crossing the English Channel in small boats. This is how Chuck the Cuck has responded:
King Charles meets former refugees from Sudanese community
The King told former refugees who escaped by boat to Europe from the Darfur genocide: “I’m so glad you’re safe here.” On Wednesday Charles met accountants, NHS consultants and charity workers who have made a new life in the UK. Sudanese activist Amouna Adam invited him to meet her community when the pair met on Holocaust Memorial Day. […] The event, organised by the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust and the human rights organisation Waging Peace, was held at a central London venue used for events by the UK’s Sudanese community. Addressing the men and women who fled the mass killings, the King said: “It’s been a very special visit for me, I can assure you. It’s been such a pleasure to meet you all — I’m so glad you’re safe here.” (King Charles meets former refugees from Sudanese community, BBC News, 15th March 2023)
Chuck the Cuck can be “glad” about Black Sudanese invading Britain because he doesn’t have to pay the costs of their presence. That’s why I hope to see him put on trial one day and face questions about an ordinary White woman who has had to pay the cost of the Sudanese presence:
‘Savage’ rapist Zakarya Etarghi has been given a life sentence with a minimum of 18 years after shattering his victim’s skull and leaving her for dead near a children’s play park. The 24-year-old attacked a woman in her 50s at a public park in Leicester, East Midlands, after a cocaine and alcohol binge.
Today he was jailed at Leicester Crown Court after being convicted of rape and attempted murder on March 7. … Building-site worker Etarghi attacked his ‘vulnerable’ victim and left her with horrific life-changing injuries including a ‘shattered’ skull and bleeding to the brain.
But a member of the public found her with head injuries at the park following what prosecutor William Harbage QC previously told the jury was a ‘brutal’ and ‘appalling’ assault. … Despite the evidence against him, Etarghi, who was born in Sudan, denied the offences — saying someone else must have carried out the attack.
Judge Nicholas Dean QC said his victim was ‘lucky to be alive’ after being ‘attacked in a most brutal way’ when she met Etarghi in the playground — with evidence suggesting a weapon of some kind had been used. … The judge said he had ‘no hesitation’ in concluding Etarghi was a ‘dangerous offender’ who was responsible for ‘controlled and extreme brutality and physical violence of a most callous and horrifying type.’
The court heard a resident found her unconscious and naked from the waist down at around 4.40am after the attack, suffering from multiple injuries. She was rushed to hospital — [and] ‘miraculously’ survived after undergoing life-saving surgery and is still recovering.
Speaking in a victim impact statement, the victim said: ‘If I could describe the last few months, I would say they have been hell. It is like something out of a horror film. It’s like something you see on the news that happens to other people. I no longer feel safe walking to and from my home, especially late at night. I constantly worry something is going to happen.’ (‘Savage’ rapist, 24, who shattered woman’s skull during horrific attack in a children’s play park then left her for dead is jailed for life, The Daily Mail, 25th March 2019)
Thanks to non-White migration, many British Whites have undergone experiences “like something out of a horror film.” Chuck the Cuck has certainly heard about some of those experiences — the rape-gangs in Rotherham and the suicide-bombing in Manchester, for example — but it has made no difference to his minority worship. Indeed, I can see a good parallel between Chuck the Cuck and the Sudanese rapist Zakarya Etarghi. Both of them are obviously dedicated to pursuing their own pleasure at no matter what the cost to others. Etarghi committed rape and Chuck the Cuck commits what I’ll call moral masturbation, that is, the self-pleasuring act of parading one’s virtue and minority-worship in public. When Chuck the Cuck tells low-IQ Sudanese that “I’m so glad you’re safe here,” he doesn’t care about the ordinary Whites who will be harmed by their presence. After all, he wouldn’t be rewarded with leftist acclaim and progressive kudos for defending the interests of Whites. On the contrary, he would be condemned as a racist and bigot for doing that. Defending Whites would take courage that he doesn’t possess and inflict costs that he isn’t prepared to pay.
Crowning the Cuck
Chuck the Cuck will indulge in more moral masturbation during his coronation. It’s already been announced that he will “put refugees and the [ethnically enriched] NHS [National Health Service] at the heart of a diverse Coronation that will bring the nation together in a three-day celebration designed to reflect modern, multi-cultural Britain.” Andrew Joyce has explained how much harm non-Whites do to the NHS, but that makes no difference to Chuck the Cuck. Now there are even reports that the Church of England, no mean moral masturbators themselves, are expressing doubts about the way he wants to involve other religions in the coronation. I doubt that even Chuck the Cuck wants to be crowned by the Chief Rabbi as a chorus of vulnerable asylum-seekers chant “Allahu Akbar!” and wave the severed heads of assorted infidels. But he will want something not far off. Like his mother, he is a dedicated traitor to both the White British and to Christianity, the religion in which he was baptized and that he has sworn to defend.
And I wonder whether that betrayal of his religion is even worse than it appears. There are no obvious Christian symbols on the invitations he has issued for his coronation. But there is an obvious pagan symbol: the Green Man at the bottom. Is that a hint of where Chuck the Cuck’s real loyalties lie? That is, is Chuck the Cuck not merely a shabbos-goy and traitor, but a literal worshiper of evil? Whether he is or not, one thing is certain. Like the reign of Elizabeth the Evil, the reign of Chuck the Cuck will be pleasing to Satan, not to Jesus Christ.