The Premier and the Pedo-Pal: Thoughts on Keir Starmer and Peter Mandelson, Firm Friends of Jewish Israel, Extreme Enemies of the White West

Dying young. It turns performers into legends and politicians into footnotes. For proof of that, just compare James Dean (1931-55) with John Smith (1938-94). Seventy-one years after he died in a car-crash, the actor James Dean is still famous, still at the heart of a devoted cult. Thirty-two years after he died of a heart-attack, the politician John Smith is a footnote to the dazzling career of Tony Blair, the man who succeeded Smith as leader of the British Labour Party.

Skeptic out, sycophant in

Blair dazzled in the early days, that is, before the voters reached the same conclusion about him as voters in America and France would later reach about the very similar Obama and Macron. As I pointed out in “Blobamacron: Three Gentile Narcissists with One Jewish Agenda,” voters realized in all three cases that they’d been fooled by con-men who promised big and delivered small. But Blair wouldn’t have had the chance to dazzle if John Smith hadn’t died so prematurely. And so conveniently for Britain’s energetic Israel lobby, which had found Smith far less amenable than Blair. Someone else who found Smith’s death very convenient was Peter Mandelson, the half-Jewish, wholly homosexual Labour grandee who had just hit the headlines in the biggest of the scandals that have dogged his entire career. Smith rejected Mandelson: “when he succeeded Neil Kinnock as leader in 1992, John Smith would have nothing to do with Mandelson].” Blair embraced Mandelson and allowed him to control his career. So after Smith died, the sun began to shine on two men and one country: Blair, Mandelson, and Israel.

Premier and Pedo-Pal #1: Tony Blair grins with Peter Mandelson back in the 1990s (image from The Independent)

That’s why I suspect the Israel-skeptic Smith was assassinated to clear the way for the Israel-sycophantic Blair. I suspect the same of two earlier Labour leaders: the almost-forgotten Hugh Gaitskell (1906-63), who died young like John Smith, and the still-famous Harold Wilson (1916-95), who succeeded Gaitskell and enjoyed dazzling success like Blair. A Jewish politician once said of Wilson: “I don’t think Harold [had] any doctrinal beliefs at all. Except for one, which I find utterly incomprehensible, which is his devotion to the cause of Israel.” I disagree with that assessment: I think Wilson’s devotion was very comprehensible. Blair also displayed “devotion to the cause of Israel” and probably for the same reason: that Israel was blackmailing him about secret misbehavior. But aren’t those shocking claims to make about a close ally of Britain? How can I suggest that Israel would assassinate or blackmail politicians in Britain or anywhere else in the world? Well, I can do that very easily and very plausibly. The Jewish state of Israel embodies three core traits of Jewish psychology: selfishness, arrogance and amorality. Only one consideration matters: “Is it good for Jews?” And it was good for Jews – very good – when John Smith and Hugh Gaitskell died young and were replaced by Tony Blair and Harold Wilson.

Mandelson the Magnet

That isn’t proof of Israel’s involvement in those early deaths, of course, but it is highly suggestive. I would certainly put nothing past the Jew Peter Mandelson, who long ago won the same nickname from some of his gentile colleagues as the Jew Richard Perle won in America. Mandelson and Perle are both nicknamed “The Prince of Darkness.” In other words, gentiles accurately recognized that Mandelson and Perle are predatory and amoral men who are not in politics to serve the general (or gentile) public. But there’s one big difference between Machiavellian Peter Mandelson and Machiavellian Richard Perle. Unlike Mandelson, Perle isn’t a giant shit-magnet and hasn’t been dogged by scandal and accusations of sleaze throughout his career.

Premier and Pedo-Pal #2: Keir Starmer (right) grins with Peter Mandelson despite knowing of Mandelson’s friendship with Jeffrey Epstein (image from The Independent)

The latest scandal to engulf magnetic Mandelson has confirmed his long-standing nickname. Emails and texts released in the latest tranche of the “Epstein Files” have confirmed that Mandelson was a firm friend and helper of the Jewish sex-criminal Jeffrey Epstein, endlessly eager to give Epstein exploitable financial secrets, entirely unconcerned about Epstein’s predation on under-aged shiksas. Britain’s current prime minister Keir Starmer, who appointed Mandelson as Britain’s ambassador to Washington, has expressed utter dismay and outrage over these revelations. Yes, Starmer knew that Mandelson had been “friends” with Epstein well after Epstein had been exposed as a sex-criminal, but Epstein has committed sex-crimes only against unimportant White girls, so Starmer was happy to accept Mandelson’s assurances that the friendship hadn’t been close. After all, who could have guessed that Peter “Prince of Darkness” Mandelson, with his decades-long reputation for sleaze, self-service and amorality, might be lying and might prove less than suitable as Britain’s most important ambassador?

Geographically, not genuinely

Starmer and others in the Labour elite certainly didn’t guess. Or so they’re now saying. They’re angrily accusing Mandelson of telling endless “lies” and of having “betrayed our country, our parliament and [our] party.” The first accusation is entirely accurate; the second is only part-accurate. Yes, Mandelson is a liar, but no, he isn’t a traitor to Britain. He isn’t British, so he could never betray this country. Instead, Mandelson is trans-British, with the same entitlement to genuine British identity as a “transwoman” has to genuine female identity. Jews like Mandelson can be geographically British or European, but never genuinely British or European. The same goes for Jeffrey Epstein: he was trans-American, not American. Like Mandelson, he worked on behalf of two overwhelmingly important entities: himself and Israel. That’s why he supplied under-aged shiksas to rich and powerful gentiles like Bill Clinton and Bill Gates, gathering abundant material for permanent blackmail.

And that’s why Epstein referred so often and so disdainfully to “goyim” in his emails and texts. But his use of that fascinating Hebrew term hasn’t been discussed in the Jew-dominated mainstream media. You see, it wouldn’t be good for Jews if ordinary gentiles became aware of what Kevin MacDonald calls Jewish hyper-ethnocentrism and started to wonder whether Israel was really such a good and faithful ally of the West. It isn’t, of course. If Israel can’t blackmail important goyim in the West, it will assassinate or otherwise destroy them, then replace them with goyim who can be blackmailed. The unblackmailable Labour leaders John Smith and Hugh Gaitskell were assassinated; the unblackmailable Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn was destroyed by other means.[i]

Twinky, Twinky, Brittle Starmer

Corbyn was then replaced by Keir Starmer, whose suitability for blackmail may be apparent in an extraordinarily under-reported story about young male prostitutes from Ukraine committing arson against his property in London. The twinks haven’t provoked any thinks in the mainstream media. As Nick Griffin has pointed out: “So, whichever explanation you prefer [for the arson], you will surely agree that the strangest thing of all in this very queer story is that it isn’t a story. That the mass media continue to censor themselves; that they refuse to share this very profitable story with the masses at all.” If Starmer is a secret user of young male prostitutes (or worse), Israeli intelligence would certainly know and Israel would certainly be eager to blackmail him over it, like Tony Blair and Harold Wilson before him. This would explain why, like Tony Blair and Harold Wilson before him, Starmer displays “devotion to the cause of Israel” — and equal disdain for the cause of Britain.

Twinky, Twinky, Brittle Starmer: the three alleged rent-boys whose connection to Keir Starmer is being ignored by the mainstream media (image from BBC)

It was not in Britain’s interests to appoint a sleazy Jew like Peter Mandelson as ambassador to Washington. But it was in the interests of Israel and of other sleazy Jews, like those running Palantir, the surveillance-state specialists ushered into Britain by Mandelson’s lobbying firm. That’s why Mandelson’s appointment was welcomed by the Conservative grandee Danny Finkelstein, who described Mandelson as the “ideal person” to be Britain’s most important ambassador. Finkelstein further gushed: “My question was always: would Keir Starmer be bold enough to pick Peter Mandelson? I’m pretty impressed that he was.” Finkelstein is supposedly a political opponent of Labour figures like Mandelson, but his warm words for the sleazy slitherer prove that the so-called Conservative Party and the so-called Labour Party are merely two wings of a uniparty devoted to serving the interests of Israel and Jews.

Indeed, Finkelstein played the same role for the Conservatives as Mandelson played for Labour. These two Jews completed the “modernization” of their respective parties. In other words, they trashed the last traces of tradition in these parties and converted them into vehicles for the same pro-Israel, pro-minority, pro-migration agenda. Mandelson is often hailed as the chief architect of New Labour, which would much more accurately be called Jew Labour. His close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein is a perfect embodiment of Labour’s new “values”: the party now works for the plutocracy, not the proletariat. And Mandelson’s utter unconcern for the under-aged shiksas on whom Epstein preyed for so long also embodies Labour’s new “values.” Throughout Britain, Labour councils have not just ignored but actively assisted Muslim gangs in the rape, torture and enforced prostitution of women and girls from the White working-class whom the Labour Party was founded to serve at the beginning of the twentieth century.

White Awareness Awakens

By the end of the twentieth century, Labour had completed its transformation from party of the proletariat to party of the plutocracy. That’s why I’ve suggested that Labour would have to be re-named the “Lawyer Party” if there were a rule that the names of political parties had to accurately reflect their true principles. But the “Lawyer Party” wouldn’t be fully accurate either. So what would be? I suggest the “Slaves of Israel Party.” Or rather, I suggest the “Red Servants of Israel Party” for so-called Labour and the “Blue Servants of Israel Party” for the so-called Conservatives.

A suggestion like that would have been greeted with horror and disgust by the vast majority of British Whites when Peter Mandelson first became prominent in British politics back in the 1980s. Forty years later, awareness of Jewish arrogance, selfishness and amorality is much more widespread. And few people have done more to waken Whites to awareness than the Prince of Darkness himself, the selfish, arrogant and utterly amoral Peter Mandelson, firm friend of Jewish Jeffrey and extreme enemy of the White West.

[i]  Corbyn was endlessly accused of anti-Semitism by his Jewish opponents, who were outraged that he wasn’t making Jewish interests his first and overwhelming concern. One piece of evidence for Corbyn’s anti-Semitism was that, in discussing earlier developments in the Epstein scandal, he had pronounced the name “Ep-shtine” rather than “Ep-steen,” supposedly trying to emphasize Epstein’s completely irrelevant Jewishness. Was Corbyn sardonically getting his own back when, in discussing the latest development in the scandal, he used the pronunciation “Ep-stine”? I don’t blame him if he was.