One lie makes more noise than a hundred truths.
Georges Bernanos

Let’s be clear from the start: no White person should feel guilty about colonialism and the horrors of slavery. The “decolonials,” the Islamo-leftists, and the Repentance terrorists have lied about the history of these events in order to neutralize with guilt the racial consciousness and survival instinct of the White race, which they are determined to eradicate from the surface of the earth.

Unfortunately, this dirty work of guilt-tripping is often carried out by self-hating Whites, at first sight sincere and well-intentioned, but ill-informed and sometimes motivated by a powerful need to Whitewash a bad reputation or make social and/or financial gains by signaling their virtue to the “progressive” crowd that values emotion instead of reason.[1] As says eminent virologist and Nobel laureate Frank Macfarlane Burnet:

These hypocritical displays of love always accompany “a race for power.” To “save” someone, to whine about their fate, to be moved by the misfortunes of others, is to increase one’s own social value, and thus, to acquire respectability, notoriety, and power.[2]

Racial minorities in general also have a vested interest in blaming Whites for all their ills. As the American evolutionary psychologist Dr. Kevin MacDonald has shown, from a strictly evolutionary point of view, the all-out denigration of the White majority gives minorities a definite competitive advantage.[3] Since, in the present circumstances, individualism, pathological compassion, suicidal and punitive altruism are among the greatest handicaps of Whites, the pack of racial predators most adept at smelling the prey mortally wounded by guilt and noble sentiments has no difficulty in imposing itself:

White people are high trust, high empathy and have guilt cultures rather than shame cultures (as do the vast majority of the world), which means they feel moral guilt which is susceptible to being defined in terms of principles (“races are social constructs” and egalitarianism) that can be captured and used against them.[4]

The picture would not be complete without naming the shadowy network of international financiers and Big Business who finance and promote the useful idiots of this war on Whites.[5] Jewish currency speculator George Soros comes to mind but, as shown by the Epstein files, there are other shadowy Jewish billionaires, that are never mentioned anywhere.[6] The ultimate goal of this subset of organized Jewry is to create a worldwide collectivist society of consumers easy to manipulate and control; a society where the notion of belonging to a country or a race will be obsolete; a society where no one will have any identity, other than that of consumer. This future is described as a “global utopia” for the ruling Jewish elite and its non-Jewish vassals, a nightmare for the millions of rootless, acculturated post-national nomads.[7]

In this light, here are the main arguments that Africans and Blacks in general use to gain social benefits or to justify their social marginalization and economic stagnation, both in their adopted country and in their country of origin:

Africa considers that it has been marginalized by historical evolution, says the vice president of Senegal. Its impoverishment is the cumulative result of 300 years of slavery, 100 years of colonization, and, since independence, economic domination, which translates into the exploitation of its resources and the labour of its people at prices that are in a perpetual historical downward trend.[8]

In short, if today’s Africa is going nowhere, it’s mainly because the White slave nations emptied it of its lifeblood before building their industrial revolutions on the profits of slavery and then plundering the continent through colonial exploitation.[9] This is, of course, a fantasy. We will see why, by analyzing the painful questions of slavery and colonialism, highly passionate and explosive subjects that stir up not only Black hatred of Whites, but also, and more important, White hatred of Whites.

Truth About Slavery

The long-standing “ebony trade” was not a diabolical invention of Europe and Whites. When the European slave trade began in the 16th century, it was in fact the Blacks themselves who captured other Blacks to sell them to White slave traders. The latter, with some exceptions, never went inland. They came to the West Coast of Africa (Niger Delta) to buy their slaves from African professionals specialized in this brokerage traffic. “The European slave trade, according to African history specialist, Bernard Lugan, was not an innovation brought in from outside, but the evolution of a trade that had always existed.”[10]

Furthermore, the European slave trade had no negative effect on the demographic development of the African continent. The regions where this trade was most flourishing, Ghana, Dahomey, Togo, and Cameroon, are currently the most densely populated countries in Africa.[11] The current emigration to Western countries of Africans who are relatively well-off compared to their compatriots is far more economically and socially damaging to African countries than slavery ever was.

Moreover, the industrial revolutions of White slave countries were not helped by the profits made by this trade. “Common sense and elementary historical culture allow us to affirm that the Industrial Revolution of developed countries was made possible by their human knowhow, their iron and their coal,” asserts Bernard Lugan in his book, Afrique, l’histoire à l’endroit (Africa, History Upright).[12]

As corroborated by researcher Pétré-Grenouilleau, the contribution of slave capital to the formation of British national income, for example, rarely exceeded 1%, averaging around 0.11%.[13] Furthermore, in the slave states of the southern United States, there was not even an Industrial Revolution, unlike in the northern states, which had few Black slaves.[14]

Before demanding reparations, Blacks should know that in the United States, a large number of Blacks were themselves Black slave owners. A free Black man named Antony Johnson owned the first legally recognized slave, John Casor, owned by a Black. By 1860, the number of Black slaves owned by free Blacks was nearly 20,000. Thousands of free Blacks that owned Black slaves even joined the Southern Army in the Civil War to preserve the practice of slavery, which they refused to abandon, like their African brethren.[15]

Blacks should also know that many of the slaves in the South were White slaves who were kidnapped out of their homes in Wales, Scotland, and Ireland. Entire White families were also ensnared for generations into debt slavery. The wealth used to finance the construction of American infrastructure was not extracted from Black slaves but from White yeomen and White slaves through taxation, usury, debt slavery, and classic slavery. In fact, those same oppressed, dispossessed White classes are the ones who built the majority of American infrastructure. Black slaves were treated significantly better than White slaves. They picked cotton for their masters in the first century or two of America, then were weaponized as violent golems against White yeomen right up to the present.[16]

The “progressives” are good at burying the Arab-Muslim slave trade, which was far more important and deadly than the European slave trade, because it is vital for the needs of the cause that Whites alone be responsible for this trade. This trade, which began in the 8th century and ended more than 75 years after the abolition of the European slave trade in 1848, caused much more demographic and economic damage to certain African countries than the European trade, because the Arabs literally “emptied” the regions that served as their reservoir of slaves.[17]

White haters also ignore the Arab-Muslim slave trade of White Christians that took place throughout much of European history. Between the 16th^tand 18th centuries, for example, Ohio University history professor Robert Davis estimates that more than a million White slaves were captured on the coasts of Europe and on ships pirated by the North African countries (Maghreb).[18] The mainstream media also obscure the fact that the Arab-Muslim slave trade was a major source of wealth for many of these countries.

The media legacy also ignores the inter-European trade in White Christians. It already existed in the time of the Greeks and Romans, and continued throughout Europe until at least the French Revolution. According to historian B. S. Bachrach, in the ninth century, slave traders in the city of Lyon, France, for example, kidnapped and castrated Christian youths for the Muslim market in Spain, with the blessing of the elites and King Louis the Pious, who profited from this illegal trade not only in Frankish territory, but throughout Christendom.[19]

Jewish Role in Slavery

Finally, the forgers of history forget to mention that, like the inter-European trade of White Christians, the European slave trade was a Jewish specialty. The vast majority of slave traders who were not Arabs or Blacks were in fact Jews. They owned the slave ships; the crews and auction brokers were predominantly Jewish, as were a disproportionate number of slave owners, especially in the West Indies, Brazil, and South America. The headquarters of this very lucrative trade were in New Port Rhode Island, which is also the site of the first synagogue in the Western hemisphere. Trading in this human misery was halted on Saturdays to observe the sabbath.[20]^, [21]

Yet, in the anti-White propaganda film Amistad, director Steven Spielberg, had the typically Jewish nerve (chutzpah) to blame White Christians alone for the European slave trade. As French author Renaud Camus says, what better way, in a doublethink matter, to provide oneself, on the back of Whites, “with a good name and with absolute protection against all criticism: how could anyone criticize virtue, goodness, generosity, equality, fraternity between people from all walks of life?”[22]

This is also a good way for liberals to inflame Blacks by portraying them as being abused and persecuted by White bigots. Such propaganda in the end is obviously designed to arouse racial hatred against Whites not only among Black Americans, but more importantly, among Whites.[23]

To recapitulate, there have been several types of slave trade, in order of antiquity:

• – inter-African Black slave trade by Blacks (the oldest) ;
• – inter-European slave trade of Whites by Jews and Arabs;
• – Arab-Muslim slave trade of Whites by Arabs;
• – Arab-Muslim slave trade of Blacks by Arabs and Blacks;
• – European slave trade of Blacks by Jews and Blacks;
• – Jewish slave trade of Chinese.

And this is without mentioning that indigenous tribes from all continents, Maoris, Amerindians, Africans, and Aborigines also practiced slavery.[24] The only excuse present-day academics have for perpetuating the myth of the noble savage is a willfully blind Europhobia.[25]

Seen from today’s perspective, the universal phenomenon of slavery was an abomination, and the buyers were as responsible as the sellers. But just as it is absurd to judge the past with the values and knowledge of the present, it is also absurd to hold people of today responsible for the acts their ancestors committed when they were not even born. Guilt is not genetically transmitted; a son is not responsible for his father’s crimes; asking for reparations two hundred years after the fact, and only from Whites, makes no sense. The law is not retroactive. Let us not forget either that this trade was abolished for moral reasons by the Whites themselves, to the great displeasure of their African partners who did not at all understand the meaning of this decision.[26]

Many have not yet understood because slavery is still commonplace in Africa and in Israel. Since its destruction by NATO for so-called humanitarian reasons, Libya, for example, has become a hub for this highly lucrative trade. Future slaves are captured by Arab and African merchants as they cross the Sahara on their way to Europe. Chained and put up for sale, or worked to death, their attempt to reach Europe ends badly, to the total indifference of the media. [27] In Israel, where slavery is a God-given right inscribed in the Torah, thousands of women from Ukraine and other Eastern European countries are victims of the sex trade. Migrant workers are forced to sleep in the fields they tend while their bosses hold their passports hostage. Ethiopian women escaping the war-stricken Tigray region are shipped off to Jordan and forced into full-time servitude.[28]

Truth About Colonialism

It is also false to claim, as the Senegalese-born Boucar Diouf does, that the industrialized nations got rich by “pumping” the very substance of the colonies.[29] This preposterous idea, which is widely promoted by the school, media, and Hollywood propaganda that is currently rampant in all Western countries, has crystallized around a book by the West Indian Marxist Frantz Fanon, which the globalists have summarized in a phrase designed to capture the imagination: “The rich man’s cow eats the poor man’s grain.” According to Bernard Lugan, this indictment of the West constitutes the essence of the globalists’ anti-colonialist doctrine.[30]

If the colonialists imported raw materials from their colonies, they did not steal them. In exchange, they built ports, cities, hospitals and roads; they brought new tools and new agricultural plants; they opened up new spaces for cultivation, and all this at a loss because, in the words of Lugan, “the colonial market was useless and cumbersome.”[31]

All the humanist enterprises of the socialist left — the one that today has the nerve to accuse the right of the misdeeds of colonization when it was opposed to it — were, from the European point of view, a monumental failure. In fact, colonial production was excessively expensive for the colonizers, not only because it was bought at a non-competitive price, but also because, by entering into direct competition with metropolitan production, it contributed to the ruin of entire sectors of the economy of the colonizing countries.[32]

In truth, colonization was rather a blessing for the colonized. None of them had invented the sail, the pulley, the wheel, and anything other but a rudimentary form of agriculture. Engineers, agronomists, and doctors greatly improved the social and health conditions of the local populations, so that Africa today is the fastest growing continent in terms of population; soldiers brought peace, missionaries and administrators put an end to famines, constant fighting for territory, mass killings, cannibalism, sacrificial murders, and slavery.[33] In fact, as in the case of the Maori, for example, it was often the colonized who asked the colonizers to assume jurisdiction of the land to save them from constant warfare.[34] To give you an idea of what the English found when they arrived in Africa, here is a partial account addressed to Mr. Walter S. Rogers of the Institute of Current World Affairs:

Dear Mr. Rogers

[…] All of southern Nigeria was a land of oppression, terror and fiendish cruelty, of slave raids, slavery juju, human sacrifice and cannibalism. […] Hundreds of people were tortured to death regularly in Benin’s juju rituals. These blood-stained rituals. These blood-stained orgies went on for centuries, and were only halted in 1897 when the British captured the city. One man who entered the city in the British expedition gave this description:

“Altars covered with streams of dried human blood, the stench of which was awful… huge pits, forty to fifty feet deep, were found filled with human bodies, dead and dying, and a few wretched victims were rescued alive; … everywhere sacrificial trees on which there were the corpses of the latest victims; … everywhere, on each path, were newly sacrificed corpses . On the principal sacrificial tree, facing the main gate of the King’s compound, there were two crucified bodies…”

It is said that the crucifixion idea was all that remained of a Portuguese attempt early in the sixteenth century to convert Benin from juju to Christianity. A Portuguese seafarer had visited Benin in 1485, the first White man known to have done so. Missionaries were sent out later, but the mission eventually had to be recalled because so many missionaries died. Fetish worship and juju rites returned and, in time, Christianity’s only permanent contribution was to give Benin the crucifixion idea for its mass ritualistic murders.[35]

Another book just as misleading as those by Frantz Fanon and Chinua Achebe mentioned above is King Leopold’s Ghost: A Story of Greed, Terror, and Heroism in Colonial Africa by the Jewish-American journalist Adam Hochschild. According to Bruce Gilley, professor of political science at Portland State University, this book—currently used in many schools—is

a vast hoax, full of distortions and errors both numerous and grave […]. Some people might view “King Hochschild’s Hoax,” as we might call it, as an empowering fable for modern Africans at the expense of the White man. But its debilitating effects on Africa, and on the Congo in particular, make the opposite more nearly the case. It is a callous and negligent chicote[36] lash on the backs of all Black Africans, narcissistic guilt porn for White liberals at the expense of the African. The Congolese lawyer Marcel Yabili calls it “the greatest falsification in modern history,” a compliment of sorts, I suppose. […] The photographs of people with severed hands were victims of gangrene, tribal vendettas, or cannibalism having nothing to do with rubber.[37]

Finally, it should be noted that colonization—or, more broadly, conquest, imperial expansion, and the imposition of domination over other peoples—is not a phenomenon exclusive to Europeans. Like slavery, it is a constant in human history, practiced by nearly all-powerful civilizations at one time or another, often in the form of military conquests, the settlement of populations, the imposition of language, religion, or culture, and economic or demographic exploitation—e.g., the Greater Israel project.[38]

Here are a few examples:

• Several African kingdoms and empires, such as the Kingdom of Aksum (1st–7th centuries) and Kongo (14th–19th centuries, present-day Angola, Congo, DRC), as well as the Empires of Ghana (approx. 8th–11th centuries) and Mali (13th–15th centuries), practiced forms of imperialism: territorial conquests, the imposition of tributes, the administration of conquered peoples, control of trade routes, and sometimes gradual Arabization or Islamization, or even the displacement of populations.[39]
• The Arabs colonized North Africa (the Maghreb: Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco), the Levant (Syria, Palestine, and Lebanon), Egypt, Mesopotamia (Iraq), present-day Pakistan, Persia (Iran), and Spain, from 711 to around 1492—a period spanning more than 700 years. These expansions took about a century to form an empire stretching from Spain to the Indus River, with Arab garrison towns and a gradual Islamization/Arabization of the local populations.[40]
• Under Genghis Khan and his successors, the Mongols established the largest contiguous empire in history, stretching from China to Eastern Europe (as far as Hungary and Poland). They conquered China (ending the Jin and Song dynasties), Korea, Central Asia (Khwarezm), Persia, Iraq, and parts of Russia and the Caucasus. The conquests were often extremely destructive (sacking of cities, mass massacres), followed by imperial administration, population displacements, and the imposition of a tribute system. Millions of people were killed or displaced, and entire cultures were upended.[41]
• The Ottoman Turks, originally from Anatolia, conquered and ruled for centuries: the Balkans (Greece, Serbia, Bulgaria, Hungary, etc.), where they imposed their administration, the devshirme system (forced recruitment of Christian children for the Janissaries), and fiscal and cultural domination.[42]
• The Chinese (the Qin, Han, Tang, Ming, and Qing dynasties) engaged in continuous expansion to the south, west, and north, establishing Han settlements in regions such as Xinjiang, Tibet, Inner Mongolia, and Yunnan. The Han often imposed their culture, administration, and language on the conquered or assimilated peoples.[43]
• Japan colonized Taiwan (1895), Korea (1910), parts of China (Manchukuo), and the Pacific Islands. It engaged in settlement colonization, exploitation, and cultural assimilation, often through brutal policies.[44]
• Jewish Zionists have been colonizing Palestine for the past one hundred years in a most cruel and sadistic matter. They engage in theft of land, torture, mutilations, rape, expulsions, and genocide by bombing, starvation, and snipper assassinations of mostly women and children.
• In short, powerful entities—whether African, Arab, Mongol, Turkish, Chinese, Persian, or Jewish—have almost all engaged in forms of territorial expansion, domination, and, at times, the cultural transformation of the peoples they conquered. Europeans did so on a large scale beginning in the 15th century thanks to their technological advantage in maritime affairs, but they did not invent either war of conquest or imperialism. It is a universal human dynamic linked to the pursuit of resources, power, and security.

It was an obscure Jewish Zionist lawyer from Poland, Raphael Lemkin (1900-1959), who sought, out of hatred for Whites, to demonize and criminalize Europeans as colonialists. Early European and modern colonialism was central to his conception of genocide and the United Nations convention on genocide (1948). Because of Lemkin’s anti-White bias, the European as a colonialist is systematically indicted as “genocidal,” deplores scholar Kerry R. Bolton in his book, The Tyranny of Human Rights. As a matter of fact, any form whatsoever of European expansion is “intrinsically genocidal,” including the age of discovery.[45] Why is European colonialism “implicitly genocidal?” asks Bolton. Is it genocidal

when suppressing indigenous bloodlust, but the wholesale intervention of the UN and its various agencies, often in partnership with global corporations that have a profit motive behind the façade, lauded as “humanitarian work”? The only consistency as usual is that of Europhobia. Prior to European colonialism, the nations of the Americas, Australia, New Guinea, New Zealand, and other non-European lands did not have any conception of race unity, of themselves as a single ethnic bloc, but rather as tribes often contending to the death. Why does UN intervention in Africa become a humanitarian necessity that is somehow of higher morality than the intervention of European colonialism? The answer is that it serves a miscreant aim behind a moral façade.[46]

The Reason for the Stagnation of Blacks and Africa

According to high-level scientists such as William Shockley (Nobel prize winner), Frank Ellis, James Watson and Francis Crick (Nobel prize winners), Chris Brand, Andrew Fraser, Nicholas Kollerstrom, Greg Clydesdale, J. Philip Rushton, Ricardo Duchesne, Charles Murray, Kerry R. Bolton, Richard Lynn, Tatu Vanhanen, and many others, if colored people in general are stagnating it is not because of slavery or colonialism, but mainly because of their low average intelligence quotient (IQ).[47]^, [48]^, [49]

With the advent of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) technology, it is now possible to accurately predict IQ and to demonstrate racial differences in IQ, thereby vindicating all the above scientists who have been ritually slanderd and expelled from their field for defending the genetic origin of IQ and of race.[50]

The GNP of a country is directly proportional to the average IQ of its people. Below an average IQ of 100 like that of Whites, it becomes difficult, if not impossible, to create, manage, and be competitive in a modern society like ours. According to Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, the average IQ of people in sub-Saharan Africa is about 70, while the average IQ of people in the Maghreb, north of the Sahara, is about 85. Asian countries with average IQs of 108, which have also experienced colonization and slavery, such as South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, and Taiwan, are among the most developed countries in the world. Without massive outside help in all matters, Israel, because of its average IQ of 94, could not survive as a modern entity. [51]^, [52]^, [53]

Ultimately, as Arthur Kemp states in his book The War Against Whites, there is no basis for the claims of Blacks and African countries allegedly affected by slavery and colonization. The entire reparations and slavery industry is based on lies spread by several nefarious sections of society intent on denigrating for financial, ideological, racial, and psychotic reasons the achievements of Whites. In the end, “this attack is driven by a hatred of Whites, and not by logic or any historical or moral argument, ” asserts Arthur Kemp.[54]

1] Virtue signaling, which is the expression or promotion of viewpoints and emotions that are especially valued within a social group allows the speaker (politician or activist of some kind) to morally supplant his fellow human beings and increase his popularity among a certain crowd that values emotion instead of reason. For a good take on the psychopathic personalities of the narcissistic left see Kerry Bolton, PhD, The Psychotic Left. From Jacobin France to the Occupy Movement, Black House Publishing, 2017.

[2] Citation from Laurent Obertone, La France interdite : La Vérité sur l’immigration, Ring, 2018, p. 378.

[3] Kevin MacDonald, PhD, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2025.

[4] merchantHelios@poa.st, Interesting thoughts from/lit/ on why so much western media is blatantly anti-White.

[5] Kerry Bolton, PhD, Revolution from Above. Manufacturing ‘Descent’ in the New World Order, Arktos, 2011.

[6] Nick Fuentes, “What They’re NOT Telling You About Epstein,” Rumble, 2026.

[7] Gearóid Ó COLMÁIN, “Rothschild’s ‘Slaughter Ships.’ Coercive Engineered Migration: Zionism’s War on Europe (Part 4 of 11),”Dissident Voice, 2016. Cited by Scott HOWARD, The Open Society Playbook, Antelope Hill Publishing, p. 223.

[8] Bernard Lugan, Afrique, l’histoire à l’endroit, Perrin, 1989, p. 25.

[9] Ibid., p. 134.

[10] Ibid., p. 136.

[11] Ibid., p. 252.

[12] Bernard Lugan, Mythes et manipulations de l’histoire africaine : Mensonges et repentance, Afrique réelle, 2012, p. 74.

[13] Ibid.

[14] Larry E. Tise, Proslavery: A History of the Defense of Slavery in America, 1701-1840, The University of Georgia Press, 1987.

[15] Philip S. Foner, History of Black Americans: From Africa to the Emergence of the Cotton Kingdom, Oxford University Press. Cited by Arthur Kemp in The War Against Whites: The Racial Psychology Behind the Anti-White Hatred Sweeping the West, Ostara Publications, 2020, pp. 163-169.

[16] Michael Hoffman, They Were White and They Were Slaves: The Untold History of the Enslavement of Whites in Early America, Independent History; 4th edition, May 31, 1993.

[17] Tidiane N’Diaye, Le Génocide voilé, Gallimard, 2017, p. 11.

[18] Robert Davis, Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, The Barbary Coast, and Italy, 1500-1800, Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.

[19] Andrew Joyce, “Agobard of Lyon and The Origins of the Hostile Elite,” The Occidental Observer, 2017.

[20] The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, prepared by the Historical Research Department of the Nation of Islam, Latimer Associates, 1991.

[21] Walter White, Who Brought the Slaves to America? White Publishing, 1966. Cited by David Duke in Jewish Suprematism: My Awakening to the Jewish Question, Free Speech Press, 2002.

[22] Douglas Mercer, The Great Replacement, Countercurrents. This is a Renaud Camus quote. The NEPAD explained, République du Sénégal.

[23] Hervé Ryssen, Satan in Hollywood. Anti-Christian Propaganda in film, The Barnes Review, 2016.

[24] Bruce Gilley, The Case for Colonialism, New England Review Press, 2023.

[25] Kerry R. Bolton, The Tyranny of Human Rights. From Jacobinism to the United Nations, Antelope Publishers, 2022, p. 77.

[26] Arthur Kemp, work cited, p. 158.

[27] Nora Adin Fares, ‘Never-ending humiliation’: Recalling horrors in Libya’s migration centres, Aljazeera, March 24 2024.

[28] Shanna Fuld, “Modern Slavery in Israel. The Women victims of human trafficking” The Jerusalem Post, April 8, 2023.

[29] Alexandre Cormier-Denis, « Grand remplacement : réponse à Boucar Diouf et Guillaume Wagner », Nomos-TV, 2019.

[30] Bernard Lugan, Afrique, l’histoire à l’endroit, Perrin, 1989, p. 249.

[31] Bernard Lugan, « L’empire colonial a-t-il enrichi la France ? », work cited, chapter X, 2012, p. 99-104.

[32] Kerry Bolton, The Tyranny of Human Rights. From Jacobinism to the United Nations, Antelope Publishers, 2022, p. 77.

[33] Bruce Gilley, The Case for Colonialism, New English review Press, 2023.

[34] Kerry Bolton, The Parihaka Cuklt, Black House Publishing, 2012.

[35] Notes on Nigeria, Institute of Current World Affairs: https://www.icwa.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/DER-42.pdf

[36] Wikipedia: A chicote is a whip made of knotted or braided leather straps, traditionally crafted from hippopotamus, rhinoceros, or buffalo hide. It is particularly associated with the Belgian colonial era in the Congo (the Independent State of the Congo under Leopold II, then a Belgian colony), where it was used to punish forced laborers, prisoners, or “natives” who failed to meet quotas (particularly for rubber).

[37] Bruce Gilley, “The Congo Hoax,” The American Conservative, Apr 17, 2023.

[38] GROK AI on X.

[39] Bernard Lugan, Quand les Africains colonisaient l’Afrique, Éditions du Rocher, 2026. This book explores the forgotten history of millennia-old internal colonization within Africa, which predates the European conquest.

[40] Ibid.

[41] GROK AI on X.

[42] Ibid.

[43] Ibid.

[44] Ibid.

[45] Kerry Bolton, work cited, p. 76.

[46] Ibid., p. 84-85.

[47] Ibid., p. 365 to 381.

[48] Collectif, QI et races : Le Cauchemar des multiculturalistes devant le réel, avec un texte d’Henry Garrett et une présentation des recherches d’Arthur Jensen, J. Philippe Rushton, de Richard J. Herrnstein, de Charles Murray, de Richard Lynn, de Tatu Vanhanen and others, Akribea, 2019.

[49] Charles Murray, Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class, Twelve, 2020.

[50] Spencer J. Quinn, “The Vindication of James Watson,” The Unz Review, April 13, 2023.

[51] Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, IQ and the Wealth of Nations, Praeger/Greenwood, 2002.

[52] Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, Human Intelligence, Political Science, Sociology, Economics, Washington Summit Publishers, 2006.

[53] IQ compared by countries, WorldData info.

[54] Arthur Kemp, work cited, p. 176.