Liberty, Equality, Depravity: Vibrant Vignettes from the Chronicles of Clown-World

The “collective failure” was caused by the fear of an accusation that the Guardian has flung again and again at White officials and White institutions: the accusation of “Racism!” Having worked so hard to create that fear, the Guardian refuses to admit its own culpability. The editorial about Southport is full of weasel-words: “nightmare … grave failures … deadly flaws … single most disturbing conclusion … dangerous culture of buck-passing … alarming instances of serious threats to public safety going unaddressed … dreadful sequence of events … individuals with a disturbing interest in violence.”

Baffled, moved, repulsed. That’s how I’ve felt reading perhaps the world’s most influential book. Yes, the New Testament often baffles me, sometimes moves me, rarely repulses me. But am I right to be repulsed? Well, see for yourself:

3:5 Every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be brought low; and the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough ways shall be made smooth; 3:6 And all flesh shall see the salvation of God. (The Gospel of Luke)

Those are the words of John the Baptist in the New Testament, based on those of Isaiah in the Old Testament. And I’m repulsed by both the metaphor and the ideology it seems to promote. I hate the image of filling valleys and lowering mountains, of straightening the crooked and smoothing the rough. I think that variety is indeed the spice of life, but John the Baptist is bigging up blandness and banality. Or so it seems. He wants the world to be a billiard ball and claims that this will bring us to God. In other words, he’s preaching the ideology of egalitarianism, saying that kings should be lowered and beggars be raised, so that hierarchy is destroyed and all men become equal.

Revolting Reds

That’s what he seems to be preaching, anyway. How else do you interpret those words? I can’t see any other way. The Levellers of the English Civil War certainly took his words at face-value. They wanted to level society, bring the mighty down and lift the humble up. The same ideology, with the same apparent inspiration in the New Testament, chopped the head off Charles I during the same war. Then the ideology dropped its Christian cloak and chopped off thousands more heads during the French Revolution, which prepared the way for the mass murder of the Russian and Chinese Revolutions. Egalitarianism is evil, whether it leads to mass murder or to men in women’s bathrooms. And egalitarianism does seem to be inspired by Christianity and by words like the ones I quoted above: “Every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be brought low.”

Of course, modern leftism isn’t really egalitarian. It just pretends to be. As I’ve often pointed out, leftists preach equality and practice hierarchy. They say we’re all the same under the skin while sacralizing Blacks and demonizing Whites, while worshipping women and demeaning men. But I think that this contradiction is inevitable, because the impossible quest for equality will always become corrupt and always be co-opted by those hungry for power and thirsty for revenge. That’s why I’m repulsed by those words in the New Testament. I hate the image of a levelled world and I hate the ideology it seems to be promoting.

Pope Leo bows before Blackness and “throws a wreath into the sea in tribute” to dead immivaders (see story at BBC)

But maybe I’m interpreting John’s words wrong. If I am, then so are the current Pope and the current Archbishop of Canterbury. They’re both leftists, both egalitarians, and both core components of Clown-World, the equality-crazed, racism-obsessed system of lies and lunacy that currently rules the West. Pope Leo has recently proclaimed to non-White immivaders of Europe that quiero inclinarme ante su dignidad — “I want to bow before your dignity.” In other words, he wants to bow before Blackness, to grovel before the false god of equality. Meanwhile, the Archbishop of Canterbury literally embodies egalitarianism. After all, she’s a woman called Sarah Mullally. A woke woman, dedicated to racial and sexual equality. That is, she’s dedicated to preaching them, but not to practising them. No, as a typical leftist she preaches equality and practises hierarchy, which is why she has never spoken out against the non-White Muslim rape-gangs preying on White women and girls in historically Christian Britain. In the leftist hierarchy of virtue and privilege, non-Whites and Muslims are far above Whites and Christians, so leftists have left the rape-gangs alone to practise the patriarchal rape-culture of Islam. In leftist eyes, it’s perfectly acceptable for men to rape and torture girls, so long as the men are non-White and the girls are White.

First adoption, then atrocity

It’s also perfectly acceptable in leftist eyes for men to rape babies, so long as the men are gay. That’s why the Arch-Invertebrate of Contemptible won’t be speaking out against a meteor-murder that’s currently flashing through the headlines in Britain. It’s a horrifying story that leftists will be anxious to assign to oblivion ASAP, because it doesn’t cast one of their sacralized groups in a good light. Please be warned that this vibrant vignette from the Chronicles of Clown-World is a disturbing read:

Dead baby, depraved gays: leftists handed Preston Davey over to be raped and tortured to death.

A teacher has been found guilty of sexually abusing and murdering the 13-month-old baby boy he adopted with his partner. Preston Davey died in July 2023 at the hands of Jamie Varley, 37, who took a year off work to adopt him. Varley, from Blackpool, told police Preston had accidentally drowned in a bath, but a post-mortem examination discovered the child had suffered 40 injuries. His partner, John McGowan-Fazakerley, 32, has been found guilty of sexual assault, child cruelty and allowing the death of a child. The pair will be sentenced on Thursday.

Warning: This article contains distressing information

Preston was adopted by Varley and McGowan-Fazakerley, a financial sales manager, in April 2023 and in the next four months he suffered sexual abuse and ill-treatment, the trial at Preston Crown Court heard. Preston was born in June 2022 and taken into care by Oldham Council. […] Varley and McGowan-Fazakerley were approved for adoption and Preston began living at their home in Blackpool in April 2023, when he was nine months old. But in the just under four months he was in their care, he was routinely ill-treated, sexually abused and physically assaulted, suffering 40 traumatic injuries. He also had indecent images and videos taken of him.

The trial heard Preston had been taken to Blackpool Victoria Hospital three times in the months before his death with suspicious bruises noticed by medical staff, but these were explained away [Occidental Observer’s comment: because leftists didn’t want to believe bad things about sacred gays]. Preston had also been seen by several social workers. Varley rushed Preston to hospital for a final time on 27 July, unresponsive. He claimed to have left the child in the bath for a couple of minutes and returned to find him submerged.

Det[ective] Ch[ief] Insp[ector] Andy Fallows said the two men were “pure evil”. “Almost from day one, they set about abusing Preston and making his short life a harrowing tale of misery and pain,” he said. “For the first nine months of his life Preston was a happy and healthy child but by the end he was a broken shell. This was due to the sordid and wicked acts of Varley and McGowan-Fazakerley.”

Karen Tonge for the Crown Prosecution Service said it was one of the “most shocking and horrific cases I have dealt with in my career”. Following an eight-week trial a jury spent about 14 hours considering the verdicts before returning to court. Varley was found guilty of murder, two counts of assault by penetration, five counts of cruelty to a child, grievous bodily harm, sexual assault of a child, 13 counts of taking indecent photos or videos of a child, one of distributing an indecent photo of a child, to his co-accused, and one of making an indecent photo. McGowan-Fazakerley was found guilty of allowing the death of a child, two counts of child cruelty and one count of the sexual assault of a child.

A spokesperson for Oldham Council said: “The death of any child is a tragedy, but this is a particularly heart-wrenching and disturbing case. We are thankful that the perpetrators of the sickening murder and abuse of an innocent child have today been convicted for their crimes.” They said an independent Child Safeguarding Practice Review was already under way, which would examine the handling of Preston’s safeguarding. “Our thoughts remain with Preston’s family, loved ones, and the many people affected by this case.” Regional adoption agency, Adoption Now, said it was a “deeply upsetting case, and our thoughts are with everyone affected by these truly awful crimes”. It said it followed “a strict and rigorous process… in the assessment and approval of adopters”. “An independent Child Safeguarding Practice Review is being completed.” (“Teacher guilty of sexually abusing and murdering adopted baby,” BBC News, 15th June 2026)

Yes, all those leftists are very sorry about what happened. They followed a “strict and rigorous process” of “assessment and approval,” but somehow handing a baby boy over to two gay men didn’t work out well. Accordingly, there’ll be a “Safeguarding Practice Review” in which leftists will examine the evil consequences of leftism, ignore the role played by leftism, and promise that it will never happen again until next time. And note that the full depravity of that child-murder was concealed by the leftist media. Leftists always say that we need to be “open about sex,” but that rule is suspended when sexual details put leftist pets in a bad light. That’s why the BBC and Guardian do not mention that “Preston had 30 external bruises, internal bruising in his mouth and throat, internal bruising to his anus, bowel and bladder, lacerations to his anorectum, and a perforated bowel.” Leftists are doing their best to conceal the fact that Preston Davey suffered regular oral and anal rape. He finally died of suffocation “by having an object placed in his mouth.”

Clear Christian duty

What was the “object”? The BBC, Guardian and other leftists do not want you to ask that question. Saintly gays must not be associated with such things and the truth must be obscured as much as possible. Sadly for leftists, the truth is still plain to see in that repulsive story. Preston Davey died by depravity because of leftism and its egalitarianism. Gay men should never be allowed to adopt babies, but for the left denying them that right was a crime against “equality.” The left demanded that gay couples be given the same rights as straight couples, because gays are “no more likely” to abuse children than straights are. That’s an obvious lie, because gays are obviously more likely to abuse. It’s partly because of the gay tendency to sexual depravity and partly because men in general are more likely to abuse. That doesn’t mean women never abuse, but it does mean that a male child is much safer when he is adopted by a straight couple, consisting of a man and a woman, than by a gay couple, consisting of two men. There is abundant evidence for that, but the left aren’t interested in evidence.

On the contrary, the left suppress evidence and are happy for gay men to carry on adopting and raping babies, sometimes to death. That’s why Sarah Mullally, the Arch-Invetebrate of Contemptible, will not be fulfilling her clear Christian duty and will not even mention, let alone condemn, the depraved murder of Preston Davey. She won’t  demand in God’s name that gays should be banned from adopting children. If egalitarianism was indeed spawned by Christianity, then Christianity has been consumed by its offspring. Like all mainstream leftists, the Arch-Invertebrate puts “equality” before morality. That is, she puts hierarchy before morality. She won’t condemn the rape-gangs because they’re Muslim; she won’t condemn those baby-rapists because they’re gay. For the left, silence and censorship are the best response to some kinds of rape. Here’s another example and another vibrant vignette from the Chronicles of Clown-World:

Within an hour of being transferred to Lambeth Hospital’s all-male psychiatric ward on 12 April 2022, an unnamed transgender man (i.e., a biological female) was pushed into a cupboard and raped. “No Adam’s apple,” the patients chanted when the woman arrived. As she went into a side room to avoid other patients asking, “Are you a girl?”, she was followed by 27-year-old Davointe Thomas. He proceeded to subject her to a sex attack. Last month, a London Crown Court convicted Thomas of rape and handed him an indefinite hospital order.

How could this have happened? How could a vulnerable woman have been placed in a secure psychiatric ward brimming with troubled, unstable men? The answer, of course, lies in the NHS’s embrace of trans ideology — an ideology in which a person’s gender identity is said to trump biological reality, safety be damned.

Indeed, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust has confirmed as much. It insisted its decision to transfer the female patient to a male psych ward was in line with NHS England’s policy on gender at the time.

This was an incomprehensibly terrible decision. Perhaps even more unfathomable is the alleged behaviour of the NHS trust during the subsequent investigation. A source told The Times that, following the rape, the trust went “into self-preservation mode” and sought to obstruct the police investigation “from the outset”.

Reportedly, the trust ignored several information requests from detectives and even shared around an internal note reading “don’t give them any more”. It took a judge’s summons for internal reports (which had previously been redacted) to be shared with investigators in full. […] If the horror of this case is not a wake-up call for those who have lobbied to normalise gender self-ID within the NHS, I’m not sure what is. (“How the NHS’s gender lunacy led to a horrific sex attack,” Spiked Online, 20th May 2026)

Depraved Davointe: the psychotic Black rapist Davointe Thomas

I didn’t need the name of the rapist — Davointe Thomas — to guess something that received no mention in that hand-wringing article. And sure enough, the rapist was Black. Not only are Blacks much more likely to commit rape, they’re also much more likely to be on a “secure psychiatric ward.” In other words, “the horror of this case” is much more of a “wake-up call” about Blacks than it is about transgender ideology. I certainly agree that transgenderism is important, but it’s important more for what it reveals about the lunacy and illogic of leftism than for the harm it has done. Far more rape and murder has been caused by the leftist privileging of non-Whites than by the leftist privileging of trans-lunatics. Across the West, millions of White women have been raped because non-Whites are allowed to occupy public space that should be reserved for Whites.

That is, millions of White women have been raped because non-Whites have been allowed to enter and inhabit White nations. But how many women have been raped because trans-lunatics have been allowed to occupy private space that should be reserved for women? Far fewer. The same applies to all other forms of harm inflicted by non-Whites, on the one hand, and by trans-lunatics, on the other. Even when you throw the trans-inspired mutilation and sterilization of children into the balance, the harm done by egalitarian anti-racism far outweighs the harm done by transgenderism. But race isn’t mentioned in that article about the rape on a psychiatric ward in London. That’s because the author of the article, Georgina Mumford, is an egalitarian too. I admire the way she’s prepared to challenge trans-toxicity, but she should challenge mud-mania too.

A plagiarist and rape-enthusiast

“Mud-mania” is what you could call the left’s worship of non-Whites, whom leftists pamper and privilege in the name of “equality.” Although some dissident leftists criticize the regnant version of anti-racism, they do so because it offends against “equality” and egalitarianism. They say that we need to treat all races equally, to ignore color, to promote or punish purely on merit or lack of it. Yes, let us recall those noble words of Martin Luther King: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.” Well, I’m not a leftist any more and I don’t think those words are noble. No, I think they’re narcissistic and deceitful. MLK was a Jew-controlled plagiarist and rape-enthusiast. He and his cult are an excellent example of how Blacks blight the White West. His egalitarian campaign for “Civil Rights” unleashed murder and misery on White America. The impossible quest to “uplift Blacks” has swallowed trillions of dollars that could have gone to benefit Whites and continue the exploration of outer space.

As the great Paul Kersey has said: We could’ve conquered Mars. Instead, the left have coddled countless muds. They’ve also allowed gays to rape babies. And allowed a Welsh choir-boy to slaughter White girls. “Welsh choir-boy” is how Southport stabber Axel Rudakubana was portrayed by the leftist media after he added another vibrant vignette to the Chronicles of Clown-World in July 2024. Yes, his parents are from Rwanda, but little Axel was born in Wales. And he sang in a church choir when he was younger. Therefore he’s a Welsh choirboy. He’s 100% British. Who but a bigot could disagree? And who but a bigot could have raised concerns about Axel before he started stabbing? When one of Rudakubana’s teachers said she was concerned about his obsession with violence and knives, she was told by her leftist colleagues that “my attitude towards risk was because I perceived him to be a black boy with a knife, they thought I was racially profiling him.” At another time, entirely accurate references to Rudakubana being “cold, calculating” and “angry” were dropped from his “care plan.” Should we tell the truth about dangerous Blacks? Or should we leave dangerous Blacks free to kill Whites? Leftists have clearly shown which option they prefer.

Dead Whites are preferable to “restricted” Blacks: two psychotic Black killers, six White victims.

Leftists showed it again with another future triple-killer, the psychotic Black Valdo Calocane in the English city of Nottingham. When Calocane showed clearer and clearer signs that he would murder someone, more leftists worked to keep him out of secure detention because there are “too many young black men in custody.” And because they “felt a pressure to avoid restrictive practice because of his ethnicity.” All over the West, leftists have avoided “restrictive practice” for dangerous Blacks, even though Blacks are much more likely to commit murder even when they don’t succumb to their much higher likelihood of psychosis. For leftists, ruining White lives is much better than restricting Black liberty.

But let’s be fair. Even when Blacks are oppressed by “restrictive practice,” they can still find ways of creating a vibrant vignette for the Chronicles of Clown-World. Davointe Thomas was “restricted” on that secure, male-only psychiatric ward in London, but was still able to commit rape when Clown-World put a deluded and probably White girl on the same ward. And let’s be fair again: it’s not just Blacks whose crimes are enabled by leftism. Salman Abedi, the Manchester bomber, looked in-bred, not Black, as he prepared to trigger his bomb and blow Whites to bits.           As the seconds ticked away, a White security-guard, marinated in leftist propaganda since childhood, thought Abedi seemed “dodgy” (that is, suspicious) but didn’t act on his instincts. Why not? As the guard later said: “I felt unsure about what to do. It’s very difficult to define a terrorist. For all I knew he might well be an innocent Asian male [in fact, Abedi was a Libyan Arab]. I did not want people to think I am stereotyping him because of his race.”

Slaughter is better than stereotyping: inbred-looking Salman Abedi and his 22 victims (Abedi is making the Islamic tawhid gesture).

Stereotyped non-Whites? Or slaughtered schoolgirls? Leftists have clearly shown which option they prefer. It’s slaughtered schoolgirls every time. The words of that security guard were reported in the Guardian, but the Guardian will never admit that its own egalitarianism and anti-racism have led directly to murder and rape. Here’s the Guardian mulling over the schoolgirls slaughtered by the psychotic Black Axel Rudakubana in Southport:

The fatal stabbings that turned a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport, Merseyside, into a nightmare on 29 July 2024 would never have happened if public bodies had done their jobs properly. Sir Adrian Fulford’s conclusion, at the end of phase one of the inquiry into the murders, was blunt. The deaths of Bebe King, six, Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and injuries to 10 other people, were the result of grave failures by police and council officers, health professionals and the anti-terrorism Prevent programme. The multi-agency systems that are meant to link them together turned out to have deadly flaws.

While the report does not single out individual police or council officers in Lancashire, where Rudakubana lived, this does not make them any less culpable. On the contrary, their collective failure to take “ownership of risk” is the single most disturbing conclusion. Ministers must not wait for the inquiry’s second phase to explain how they plan to bring this dangerous culture of buck-passing to an end. It is impossible to ignore parallels with the Nottingham inquiry into the killings carried out by Valdo Calocane in January 2024. Significant differences between the two cases include Calocane’s age (32) and severe mental illness. But both include alarming instances of serious threats to public safety going unaddressed.

[T]his inquiry and its brave participants have performed a valuable public service. First, they have provided a clear account of the dreadful sequence of events leading up to the murders. Second, they have unearthed a large amount of material with broader relevance to the way that our society deals with — and fails to deal with — individuals with a disturbing interest in violence. (“The Guardian view on the Southport inquiry: buck-passing led to three girls being killed,” The Guardian, 13th April 2026)

The Guardian is lying when it says it “is impossible to ignore parallels with the Nottingham inquiry into the killings carried out by Valdo Calocane.” It’s entirely possible to do that. That very “Guardian view” ignores the two most important parallels: that both Rudakubana and Calocane were Black and that the “collective failure” lamented by the Guardian was a direct result of their Blackness. The “collective failure” was caused by the fear of an accusation that the Guardian has flung again and again at White officials and White institutions: the accusation of “Racism!” Having worked so hard to create that fear, the Guardian refuses to admit its own culpability. The editorial about Southport is full of weasel-words: “nightmare … grave failures … deadly flaws … single most disturbing conclusion … dangerous culture of buck-passing … alarming instances of serious threats to public safety going unaddressed … dreadful sequence of events … individuals with a disturbing interest in violence.”

No, Rudakubana and Calocane cannot accurately or honestly be described as “individuals,” because they were not treated as individuals by the leftist system that enabled their triple-killings. Instead, they were treated as part of a non-White collective sacralized and privileged by the Guardian and the rest of the left. They were able to murder Whites because leftists did not want to “restrict” obviously dangerous Blacks. As it so often does, the Guardian is wringing its hands over the poisonous fruit of its own ideology. It’s lamenting a “collective failure” by leftists that sprang directly from the leftist “collectivism” that collects non-Whites under the banner of virtuous victimhood and Whites under the banner of violence and villainy.

An ideology of ugliness and evil

That separation of Black and Whites contradicts egalitarianism, of course, but egalitarianism naturally — or unnaturally — always leads to its own contradiction. Liberté, égalité, fraternité — “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity” — was the fake motto of the French Revolution. It’s the fake motto of modern leftism too. What it means in practice is that Blacks and gays are at liberty to pursue equality by committing depravity. That’s not a lethal corruption of egalitarianism: it’s the logical culmination of egalitarianism. The ideology is corrupt at root, because it’s based on fantasies and lies.

Human beings are not and never will be equal. Like different breeds of dogs, different races, sexes and sexualities of human will never be the same in their potentials or propensities or pathologies. Wanting to make them so is like wanting to raise valleys and lower mountains. It’s impossible to achieve and would ruin the world if it were achieved. Egalitarianism is an ideology of ugliness and evil that claims to seek “equality” while privileging non-Whites and punishing Whites. Egalitarianism is why Kriss Donald was incinerated, Mary-Ann Leneghan was butchered, and Henry Nowak bled to death in handcuffs. Egalitarianism has led directly to slaughtered schoolgirls and babies being raped to death. Non-Whites do not belong in the White West and homosexuals should never be allowed to adopt children. For abundant proof of that, just consult the Chronicles of Clown-World.