General

The Protocols of the Epstein Firsters. Letter to President Putin

/13 Comments/in , /by

If you don’t want to slip up tomorrow, speak the truth today.
Bruce Lee

Presidential Administration
Staraya Square, Moscow, 103132
letters.kremlin.ru.

Dear President Putin,

I am one of your long-time fans and a great admirer of Russian culture and achievements, but I cannot help wonder why, in your conflict with Ukraine, you have never called out the banking cartels headquartered in “The City” of London and Wall Street, together with their various global financial and economical networks such as the US Federal Reserve, the Bank of International Settlements, the International Money Fund, the World Bank, the European Central Bank, and other Central Banks and corporations dispersed all over the world.[1]

“As Lord Acton warned some 150 years ago,” writes market analyst, author, and former hedge fund manager, Alex Krainer, “The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.”

This fight is now upon us. It might be the ultimate struggle between humanity’s emancipation or our final enslavement. To prevail, we must understand our true enemies and the financial, economic, political and social structures enabling their agenda.

In short, we must not be distracted by myriad marginal issues and false dichotomies like left vs. right, liberals vs. conservatives and so forth. The ultimate culprits, the super-predator threatening humanity are the high-level bankers: a handful of families and individuals who control and manage the present monetary system. We have no choice but to oppose and defeat them.[2]

You are not a racialist, Mr. President, and I know you like Jews, you have many Jewish friends, your mentor and judo coach, the late Anatoly Rachlin, was Jewish, and your Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin is part Jewish. You are rightly the President of all Russians, good or bad, including Jews, but I must tell you right from the start: I do not share your feelings toward Jews. I don’t hate them or mean them harm, but I don’t like them much and prefer to keep my distances.

With few notorious exceptions, I don’t see many Jews vigorously complaining in the streets or in mainstream media about the genocide in Gaza or about the sad state of my country, which is being invaded by Third-World immigrants often with the approval and help of Jewish activists and intellectuals. Many Jews vomit their hatred of Whites and their desire to kill them and cause their disappearance. And many are pushing for measures that benefit them to the detriment of my race.

The “Seal Puppy” Hunt that’s Coming: The Ache of Envy and Other Obstacles to Change

The Jewish Interest in Multiethnic Immigration and Multiculturalism

So, Mr. President, in what I call the “Epstein Firsters” described in this letter, I include all Jews that silently approve or are involved in one way or the other with what the Jewish-led oligarchs, organized international Jewry, and their non-Jewish allies and vassals, are doing to our countries.

The ability to lie to your face, a complete lack of empathy and compassion for non-Jews, which they dehumanize by labelling them as Amalek or “animals,” a lack of scruples, and a predatory drive for dominance are the character traits that define the Epstein Firsters. They are the ones manoeuvring in the background to destroy us.

They want you dead or alive, Mr. President. They want to push you out of power, loot your natural resources, steal your weapons, and dismantle your federation into dozens of smaller countries easy to control. This has been their game-plan all along. Once you are dispossessed, they will try to do the same thing to China. Their end goal is nothing less than a unipolar Jewish utopia ruled from Jerusalem in which all non-Jews will be their slaves.[3]

I have written a few articles on the subject of Jews that were published in The Occidental Observer, the most influential Internet platform on White identity, interests, and culture. In this letter, to give you an idea of where I stand on the Jewish question, I have taken the liberty to include references, notes, and the title and links to some of my articles. I invite you, or your staff, respectfully, Mr. President, to read them, if you find the time during your busy schedule, as they might help you to better understand how I have formed my opinion. And If I’m wrong, I urge you, respectfully, to lead me back in the right direction. I don’t have at my disposal one of the best secret services in the world to help me see through the complexities of this subject, which I am trying to elucidate to the best of my abilities.

Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World

The Hidden Messages of Schindler’s List

As a White man of European descent, severely threatened by these miscreants, I feel it is my paramount duty, for reasons of self-defence, to defend my race by informing you, Mr. President, if you don’t already know, that all the Western governments that are helping Ukraine’s Jewish government with the taxes of their own citizens, are completely in their power. I am telling you this because I believe you are one of the few leaders capable of defeating the fiends at war with our countries and humanity.

For electoral, financial, ideological, and sometimes dishonest reasons, the leaders of these countries no longer serve their citizens. They serve a foreign country, Israel, and a foreign people, organized Jewry led by the money lenders of “The City” and Wall Street, aka the Epstein class. As such, they are Epstein Firsters.

Indeed, the former head of the French Situation-Intelligence-Electronic Warfare Office at the Joint Staff for Operational Planning, General Dominique Delaware, who died suddenly in a suspicious way, has shown in two damning articles that the governments and politicians of the galaxy of neoliberal democracies of the West, better known as the “International Community” are led by this rich class of Jews, Mr. President. The banking cartels, organized Jewry, Israel, and their allied governments of the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, European Union, South Korea, and Japan, are all united against you toward one goal: global governance and a Jewish-ruled world. [4], [5]

Jewish Control of the US

The following explanations, Mr. President, are by no means complete, not all presidents are covered, but they will show you how power in the US has been under the influence of the Epstein Firsters for a long time.

Teddy Roosevelt (1901–1909)

Many past and present American and European politicians were either Jewish or Jewish puppets, starting with Teddy Roosevelt, who became president in 1901 because of Jewish financial support and voting blocks[6] following the convenient assassination of the passionate advocate of the American system of economics,[7] President William McKinley.

He was an early supporter of Zionism, stating after the Balfour Declaration that it was “entirely proper to start a Zionist state around Jerusalem.” Jewish newspapers universally extolled him upon his death, with the B’nai B’rith Messenger declaring that “Jewish immigrants had no better friend than Theodore Roosevelt.”[8]

Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921)

Then there was Woodrow Wilson, a revolutionary leftist brought to power and totally manipulated by Jews such as Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. banks, Bernard Baruch, Paul Warburg, New York lawyer Samuel Untermyer, Louis Brandeis, the first Jew appointed to the US Supreme Court, Felix Frankfurter, not to mention the non-Jewish, “Col.” Edward Mandel House, “an agent” of the international financial interests of the Rothschild banking empire, according to American investigative journalist, Michael Collins Piper. [9]

  1. Wilson famously said when he declared war on Germany on the advice of his Jewish handlers: “The world must be made safe for democracy,” a political system, notes retired professor of philosophy, Thomas Dalton, used by Jewish elites to acquire wealth, control mass media, and influence politicians while remaining hidden from the public. This materialistic and anti-spiritual “judeocratie” elevates “mediocre” and easy to manipulate people, such as the present leaders of Western Europe, to serve Jewish interests at the expense of their non-Jewish citizens. [10]
  2. Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law on December 23, 1913, officially establishing the Federal Reserve System, a private bank, as the Central Bank of the United States.[11] Since then, America is an official member of the Central banking Empire of “The City” of London.[12]

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1933-1945)

Like his cousin Teddy Roosevelt, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who appointed more Jews to public office than all previous presidents combined, was elected because of Jewish financial and voting support. In 1932, more than 80% of the American Jewish community voted for FDR, a figure that rose to over 90% in the elections of 1936, 1940, and 1944.  This represented a tectonic shift toward the Democratic Party, with Jews constituting only 3% of the population yet making up 15% of his administration.[13]

Jewish voters were deeply impressed by Roosevelt’s occasional criticism of the Hitler regime in the 1930s and his subsequent aid to Britain. The Democratic Party’s embrace of ethnic minorities also appealed strongly to a community that had faced discrimination. A Yiddish joke stated that Jews believed in three worlds: “this world, the next world, and Roosevelt.” [14]

Harry S. Truman (1945-1953)

Then there was Harry S. Truman, who got re-elected because of Jewish and Zionist donations. Although this is controversial, writer Gore Vidal claimed that John F. Kennedy told him that Truman was the first to recognize Israel as payback for a two million dollars Jewish donation.[15]

Truman claimed that he supported Jews and Zionism mostly because he was deeply affected by the Holocaust propaganda that was broadcast by the media and Hollywood at the end of WW2. He expressed shock and disbelief upon first learning of the Nazi atrocities, stating in a 1943 speech that he “couldn’t believe it” and initially doubted Germans he knew were capable of such acts. He later condemned Adolf Hitler as a “cold-blooded, ignorant corporal,” remarking in 1945 that he hoped Hitler had been “drawn and quartered” and was “still burning somewhere.”[16]

Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World

Lyndon B. Johnson (1963-1969)

And with Lyndon Johnson in the White House—who is believed to be personally involved with Israel in the assassination of JFK[17]—we had one of the most Jewish-loving presidents of the United States, after, of course, Donald Trump, who is in a league of his own. [18], [19]

The moment Johnson became president, on the night JFK was killed, he made sure that no one would find out what really happened. All the key people of the Investigative Warren Commission he set up were either enemies of Kennedy or hardline Zionists. He also started reversing all the JFK policies that were harmful to Israeli and Jewish interests.[20], [21]

The Holocaust had a deep impact on his policies toward the Jews and Israel. He was deeply “shaken, stunned, terrorized, and bursting with an overpowering revulsion and incredulous horror” by what he witnessed at the Dachau concentration camp in 1945. He consistently framed his advocacy for Jewish refugees and support for Israel as a moral obligation, famously stating during the Six-Day War that supporting Israel was simply “the right thing to do,” even against Soviet pressure.[22]

Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World

Richard Nixon (1969-!974)

Richard Nixon made numerous anti-Semitic remarks in private Oval Office recordings, characterizing Jews as disloyal, aggressive, and dominant over the media and government. He explicitly told aides that “generally speaking, you can’t trust the bastards. They turn on you” and claimed, “most Jews are disloyal” and “out to kill us.” Yet, despite these private views and telling Henry Kissinger that Soviet persecution of Jews was “not an American concern,” Nixon publicly supported Israel during the Yom Kippur War and appointed several Jews to high-level staff positions, creating a disconnect between his private attitudes and public policy. Like many presidents before and after him, he was after all an Epstein Firster albeit a reluctant one. [23]

Ronald Reagan (1981-1989)

Ronald Reagon, who was not Jewish technically, certainly behaved as if he was. He was not elected solely because of Jewish financial and voting support, but Jewish support did play a significant role in his election.

Like all Post World War II politicians, in varying degrees, Reagan was deeply committed to Jewish causes and Israel because of the Holocaust. As a matter of fact, this is why politicians are so lenient with Jewish misconduct. Jewish victimhood status cemented in the holocaust confers moral capital, recognition, and resources to the Epstein Firsters. They cultivate this status to demand justice, reparations, or sympathy, “effectively ‘thriving’ on the recognition of their suffering,” according to Cambridge University scholars Alex Vandermaas-Peeler, Jelena Subotic, and Michael Barnett. [24]

Reagan consistently described the Holocaust as a comprehensible evil that must be remembered to prevent recurrence, stating, “We must make sure that from now until the end of days all humankind stares this evil in the face.” He expressed being “horrified” by claims that the Holocaust was a hoax, citing his WWII service viewing combat films of liberated camps as undeniable proof that “six million people whose lives were taken cruelly and needlessly” was not propaganda. [25]

He framed the establishment of Israel as a miracle emerging “from the ashes of the Holocaust” and pledged that the security of Israel and Jewish survivors would “never be compromised.” Reagan laid the cornerstone for the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in 1988, asserting that the museum’s purpose was to ensure the deaths of the 6 million had “posthumous meaning” so that such evil would “never come again.” [26]

Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World

This is why, he spoke out for Israel during the 1967 Six-Day War, and maintained a strong focus on freeing Soviet Jews throughout his presidency; formalized the strategic cooperation between the US and Israel; rescued Ethiopian Jews in Operation Joshua (1985) and awarded the Congressional Gold Medal to one of the greatest liars of the Epstein Firsters, Elie Wiesel.

Joseph Biden (2021-2024)

Joe Biden’s family is notoriously Jewish by marriage. [27] His administration was staffed with a disproportionate number of Jews belonging to the Epstein class. What former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Ronald Reagan, Paul Graig Roberts, says below about the Biden Government is true for most US governments since at least the time of Woodrow Wilson:

In the Biden regime, all powerful positions are held by Jews–the Attorney General (the police), the Secretary of the Treasury (money), the Secretary of State (foreign policy and war). There is not a single White Anglo-Saxon Protestant in the Biden cabinet. What explains that in a country of Gentiles a tiny minority of Jews occupy the power positions in the US government, the power positions in the media, entertainment, Ivy league administrations and faculties, and finance.[28]

Like Ronald Reagan, and Lyndon B. Johnson, Joe Biden is dedicated, one way or another, to the protection of Jews and Israel. As a matter of fact, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Barack Obama, and Donald Trump are all Globo-Zionists with strong ties to the Jewish elite and to Israel, the true masters of the United States and the West.

Christian Zionists

Several American high-level politicians and presidents such as Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, Ted Cruz, and Mike Pompeo,[29] who served as director of the Central Intelligence Agency from 2017 to 2018 and under President Donald Trump as the 70th United States secretary of state from 2018 to 2021, are Christian Zionists.

On the strength of the promise God made to Abraham (Genesis 12 :3), “I will bless those who bless you and him who curses you I will curse,” they believe like 30 million American Christian Zionists, “that  if they bless Israel morally, financially, and politically,

God will reward them by favoring America. Blessing Israel for America’s sake has been motivating Christian Zionists to combat antisemitism, donate to Jewish charities, and invest in and visit Israel. But it has also involved many in opposing any peace process, in supporting the continued building of Jewish settlements in the West Bank, in funding those internationally outlawed settlements, and in backing an extreme right-wing Israeli plan to transfer the Palestinians to neighboring Arab states.[30]

They believe, moreover, that they will suddenly be plucked to heaven to be with Jesus when Armageddon the battle of end times erupts (rapture).[31]

Donald Trump’s connection to Isiac Louria’s Kabbalah and the End Time Prophesies

Donald Trump has significant and documented connections to the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, primarily facilitated by his family and political allies. In 1983, Chabad gave him the prestigious Isiac Louria’s Tree of Life award for his outstanding contributions to the Israeli-American friendship.[32] Trump has frequently displayed the award plaque in his offices, notably in Trump Tower, describing it as a “very big award” that means a great deal to him.

Furthermore, he personally engaged in Chabad religious customs, specifically visiting the Ohel (the gravesite of the Lubavitcher Rebbe, Menachem Mendel Schneerson, in Queens, New York). During his presidency, Trump formalized his relationship with the movement through official acts such as the “Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.,” honoring the birthday of the Lubavitcher Rebbe.[33]

His beloved daughter Ivanka is a Lubavitcher and her husband, Lubavitcher Jared Kushner, has a long-standing friendship not only with Benjamin Netanyhua, but with Nathan Rothschild, Jeffrey Epstein’s presumed employer. In one of his shows, Alex Jones even speculated that Jared Kushner was in fact the Messiah that Jews have been waiting for.[34]

Is this why he revealed his true nature in February 2026 when he suddenly flipped from American Firster to Israel Firster? Does he feel he has an end time role to play by declaring war on Iran? It’s an open question that I would rather not try to answer.

In any case, the Jewish billionaires of the Epstein class and various Jewish lobbies such as AIPAC control all the political parties of the US; Democrat, Republican, left, right, liberal, conservative, green, or socialist, they are all cut from the same cloth.[35] American syndicated columnist Patrick Buchanan encapsulated the US’s emasculation by AIPAC and organized Jewry in his now-famous declaration: “Capitol Hill is Israeli occupied territory.”[36]

And the situation in Europe is no different. I’ll dive deep into the British situation, Mr. President, because it concerns me most, but you can repeat the same exercise for all European stock nations. Indeed, at the establishment level, France, Germany, the EU, for instance, are as Judaized as Britain.

Jewish Control of Britain

The situation in Britain for the most part is fairly different from the situation in America, but quite similar to the situation in Europe. Jews, who have been in Britain for a very long time, had plenty of time to infiltrate this nation and seize the reins of power.

Indeed, since the days of Oliver Cromwell, Jews have long been powerful in Britain and the leaders of its establishment are often Jewish themselves, like Benjamin Disraeli, the first Jewish Prime Minister of Britain.[37]

In his book, The Jews, social critic, Hilaire Belloc (1870-1953), described the British Empire as a partnership between Jewish finance and the British aristocracy. He goes on to say that “the Jews, in spite of their small numbers, color every English institution, especially the Universities and the House of Commons.” He further asserted that “the interests of the two races began to diverge before the Great War — nonetheless a formal alliance was maintained through the control of the politicians by Jewish finance — with culmination in the attempt to form an Anglo-Judaic state in Palestine.”[38]

This partnership between rich Jews and the British establishment is confirmed by Leslie Gilbert Pine (1907–1987), a distinguished British writer, researcher, and expert in genealogy, nobility, history, and heraldry. In his book Tales of the British Aristocracy, a work detailing the lives and histories of the British upper class, he states that “the Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual.”[39]

This epoch is dramatized in the very popular TV series Downton Abbey (2010-2015). In short, after the Industrial Revolution, when financial power shifted away from agriculture to manufacturing, down-and-out gentry with ancient titles and large estates, but no money, began marrying the daughters of rich Jews. The 5th Earl of Roseberry, for example, who became Prime Minister in 1894, married Hannah de Rothschild, who was the only child and sole heiress of the Jewish banker Baron Mayer Amschel de Rothschild. And Sir Ernest Cassel’s granddaughter, Edwina Cynthia Annette Ashley, married Lord Louis Mountbatten, a member of the royal family. While not related by blood, Ernest Cassel was a close friend and financial mentor to the Rothschilds, the preeminent Jewish family in Europe.[40]

As shown by Arnold Leese (1878-1956) in his pamphlet, Our Jewish Aristocracy—A revelation, the British elites, who played a major role in the Maidan coup, are indeed completely Judaized.[41] A fact corroborated not only by Hilaire Belloc, H.G. Pine, and the renowned English aristocrat and philosopher, Anthony M. Ludovici,[42] but also by highly regarded author, journalist, and consultant to the British military, Nesta Webster. In her book, Germany and England. A Prelude to War in 1938, her comments on the power of Jews and how they can make or break any man are still relevant today as we all saw with our own eyes during the election campaign of Thomas Massie:

England of 1938 is not the England of 1914 because she is no longer controlled by Britons. Ever since the war the Jewish power has been growing… We are under an invisible Jewish dictatorship but a dictatorship that can be felt in every sphere of life, for no one can escape from it… Already the Jews can make or break the career of any man. As long as the Jews do not hold Germany [my comment: and now Iran, Russia and China] they can never realize their final aim of world domination. [43]

In today’s Britain, most members of the British establishment including royalty are intimately associated with the Epstein class. In 1999, Prince Andrew, for one, gave Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein — the “Jewish Fixer” of the Epstein Firsters, to put it like America Firster Nick Fuentes—[44] an unrestricted access to the Balmoral castle estate. Newly released images and trial evidence confirm the pair were photographed relaxing in the Queen’s private log cabin at Glen Beg, a location previously occupied by Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip.[45] And the new king of Great Britain, Charles III, who was circumcised in 1948 by Rabbi Jacob Snowman, has long had a good relationship with British Jews,” notes journalist Itamar Sharon, in the September 10, 2022, issue of The Times of Israel, “and in recent years has also shored up his bona fides with Israel… Charles himself has abiding ties to British Jewish leaders and institutions, and has shown a keen interest in the stories and lessons of the Holocaust… In 2022, Charles commissioned portraits of seven Holocaust survivors to be displayed at Buckingham Palace for International Holocaust Remembrance Day.[46]

As a matter of fact, Mr. President, all British Prime Ministers involved in the Maidan conflict are all in the Jewish pocket. [47] Many are either: 1. Jewish, like Baron Richard Hermer, the Attorney General for England and Wales and Advocate General for Northern Ireland; 2. Descended from Jews, like David Cameron and Boris Johnson; or 3. married to Jews, like Keith Starmer. Others, such as Liza May, Theresa Truss, and Richi Sunak identify with Jews and Zionism out of sympathy and/or financial and electoral reasons. The fact of the matter is, none of them would be elected if they were not Epstein Firsters.[48]

This certainly explains why the United States and Britain are two of the most rabid supporters of the Ukrainian war, the Gaza genocide, the Iran war, and the Greater Israel Project. What’s left of the British and American Empires, Mr. President, is British and American in name only. It is now owned by the Jewish-led predatory bankers of “The City” of London and Wall Street, together with their financial and corporate networks. We effectively transitioned from Pax Britannica to Pax Americana to Jewish hegemony and a world of chaos. Will we ever reach Pax Judaica? It’s possible but it won’t do us any good. The world Epstein Firsters want to create is a world for Jews only, as Maurice Samuel says in his book You Gentiles,

We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build. Beyond all temporary alliances with this or that faction lies the ultimate split in nature and destiny, the enmity between the Game and God. [49]

To sum up, Britain, the United States, and all Western NATO nations, are indeed ruled by Epstein Firsters. These are the people, Mr. President, who are arming and financing Ukraine against you. They are either allies or vassals of the Jewish-led predatory bankers of the Epstein class. Here is a brief list of the weapons they use to conquer your country and the world:

The Protocols of the Epstein Firsters:

  • Work in secret, lie, cheat, embezzle, blackmail, assassinate, bomb, jail, torture, foment, plot, destroy, scare, sanction, block, intimidate, sue, and anything else you can do to weaken those we wish to dispossess no matter what the consequences are on the nations, populations, and individuals that are in your crosshairs;[50]
  • Use the Holocaust and the anti-Semitism weapons profusely, these boogeymen, together with fear, racism and hate speech accusations, are some of our best weapons and shields against our enemies; whenever you want to discredit dissenters you can also use slurs such as “conspiracy theorist,” “Nazi,” “fascist,” and “White supremacist,” or even better, use the “Protocols of the Elders of Zion” slur, but make sure you use the “fake” label; you can on top of it evoke “human rights” to bomb a country to ashes;[51]
  • Those Who Reign Supreme: The Holocaust as Linchpin of a Jewish-Ruled World
  • Demonize authoritarian types of government and promote democracy, the ideal form of government for our purposes;[52]
  • To destroy racial consciousness and national sovereignty, endorse and promote liberalism and measures such as multiculturalism, replacement immigration, critical race theory (CRT), diversity, equity, and inclusion policies (DEI), LGBT promotion, and abortion as a form of contraception;[53]
  • The Hidden Messages of Schindler’s List
  • To dumb down populations and their ability to resist, downgrade educational quality to the level of the least competent and promote and encourage consumer goods that target the limbic system, the center of emotion and motivation, with sex, drugs, and Rock and Roll;[54]
  • Work to abolish private property, race, family, and gender binarism; we want to erase all barriers and identities;
  • To weaken the police and other government institutions and businesses, staff them with women and minorities;
  • Take control of all information and media outlets: Hollywood, mainstream newspapers, TV, the Internet, book publishers, etc.;
  • Control any opposition with generous financial and career rewards;
  • Hire important influencers to promote your ideas or to defame your opponents;
  • Create false flags, false pandemics, and false climate emergencies to scare populations and force them to accept laws and policies they would normally refuse;[55]
  • Take control of the economy;[56]
  • To give them a free hand, impose legal immunity for the whole network of banks and corporations;
  • Deindustrialize and transfer all industries to third-world countries where cheap labor is abundant and taxes and regulations are optimal;
  • Make sure an American system of economy, which favors the building of infrastructure (roads, airports, trains, bridges, etc.) and economic prosperity for the “deplorables,” never sees the light of day.[57] Apply and defend the British System, which advocates for minimal government intervention, low tariffs, and reliance on global free markets;[58]
  • Create unbacked credit (money created out of thin air);[59]
  • Extend excessive debt to borrowing nations to extract political leverage or economic concessions;
  • Grab money anonymously and deposit this money in tax havens;
  • Destroy the Middle class by eliminating small community banks, the bloodline of local innovators and small businesses;[60]
  • Promote on-line shopping to further destroy the Middle class.

Ultimate goal of the Epstein Firsters: Destruction of nations and creation of a worldwide collectivist society of consumers easy to manipulate and control with the help of artificial intelligence, Central Bank Digital Currencies, digital identity, [61] and 15 minutes cities; [62] in this kind of society, the notion of belonging to a country or a race will be obsolete; no one will have any identity, other than that of consumer. This future is described as a “Jewish utopia” for the ruling Epstein Firsters, a nightmare for the millions of rootless, acculturated post-national nomads.[63]

Motivation of the Epstein Firsters: The will for power, which is the basic rule of life, with survival.[64]

Respectfully,

Pierre Simon, a concerned citizen journalist of European descent

[1] Stephen Mitford Goodson, A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Humanity, Black House Publishing Ltd, 4th Edition 2019.

[2] Alex Krainer, “Pandemics and the March of Totalitarianism,” Alex Krainer’s Substack, May 29, 2026.

[3] Michael Collins Piper, The New Babylon. Those Who Reign Supreme. A Panoramic Overview of the Historical, Religious, and Economic Origins of the New World Order, American Free Press, 2015.

[4] General Dominique Delawarde, Analysis of US/Russian-/Israeli relations, Reseau International, February 22, 2017.

[5] General Dominique Delawarde, USA-Syria-France-Israel: To better understand the Syrian conflict, Reseau international, April 8, 2017.

[6] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[7] Maurice G. Baxter, Henry Clay and the American System, University Press of Kentucky, November 19, 2004.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Michael Collins Piper, “The Making of Woodrow Wilson—An American Hero?” The Barnes Review, March 2010.

[10] Thomas Dalton, PhD, “Democracy Is an Ideal Government for Jewish Influence,” The Occidental Observer, March 25, 2024.

[11] Eustache Mullins, The Secrets of the Federal Reserve. The London Connection, Bankers Research Institute, 1993.

[12] Robert Ingraham, William McKinley. “Principles must always lead,” 2025.

[13] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[14] FDR’s Attitude to Jews in the US, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.

[15] Information obtained from Grok AI on X.

[16] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[17] Laurent Guyénot, The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, Kindle, p. 35.

[18] Armin Rosen, “Trump’s Jews: The Republican Presidential Candidate Has Jewish Family Members and Friends. Here’s Who They Are,” Tablet Magazine, July 15, 2016.

[19] Adam Green, “Trump’s Kabbala ‘Tree of Life’ Award,” Know More News, YouTube, 2019.

[20] Laurent Guyénot, The Unspoken Kennedy Truth, Kindle, p. 35.

[21] Michael COLLINS PIPER, Final Judgment. The Missing Link in the JFK Assassination Conspiracy, American Free Press, 2005.

[22] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[23] Ibid.

[24] Alex Vandermaas-Peeler, Jelena Subotic, and Michael Barnett, “Constructing victims: Suffering and status in modern world order,” Cambridge University Press, December 22, 2022.

[25] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[26] Ibid.

[27] Karen David, “Joe Biden’s Very Jewish Family,” The JC News, November 9, 2020.

[28] Paul Craig Roberts, “Are Jews Again Driving the Western World into a Fatal War?” Institute for Political Economy, September 29, 2022.

[29] Edward Wong, “The Rapture and The Real World. Mike Pompeo Blends Beliefs and Policy,” The New York Times, March 30, 2019.

[30] Victoria Clark, Allies for Armageddon. The Rise of Christian Zionism, Yale University Press, 2007.

[31] Hervé Ryssen, End Times Warfare: The Eschatological Beliefs of the Great Religions, The Barnes Review.

[32] Armin Rosen, “Trump’s Jews: The Republican Presidential Candidate Has Jewish Family Members and Friends. Here’s Who They Are,” Tablet Magazine, July 15, 2016; Adam Green, “Trump’s Kabbala ‘Tree of Life’ Award,” Know More News, YouTube, 2019.

[33] Information obtained by LEO AI.

[34] Hervé Ryssen, End Times Warfare: The Eschatological Beliefs of the Great Religions, The Barnes Review.

[35] Paul Craig Roberts, article cited.

[36] Pat Buchanan: In His Own Words, Anti-Defamation League, 2013.

[37] Anthony H. Ludovici, The Jews, and the Jews in England, Ostara Publications, 2021 (first published in 1938 under the pseudonym “Cobbett.”

[38] Hilaire Belloc, The Jews, Internet Archive, p. XVII.

[39] Leslie Gilbert Pine, Tales of the British Aristocracy, Internet Archive, p. 219.

[40] Ibid, p. 220.

[41] Arnold Leese, Our Jewish Aristocracy—A revelation, Sons of Liberty, 1896. A free PDF is available on the Internet archive.

[42] Anthony H. Ludovici, The Jews, and the Jews in England, Ostara Publications, 2021 (first published in 1938 under the pseudonym “Cobbett.”

[43] Nesta H. Webster, Germany and England. A Prelude to War, 1938, Ostara Publications, pp. 58–59.

[44] The best cogent and articulate analysis of the Epstein files is by America Firster Nick Fuentes: “What They’re NOT Telling You About Epstein,” Rumble, 2026.

[45] Francine Wolfisz, “Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell are shown on Balmoral shooting trip in latest photo dump,” Daily Mail, December 20, 2025.

[46] David Israel, “King Charles III Was Circumcised by Jewish Mohel, Cherishes UK Jews,” The JewishPress.com, September 9, 2022.

[47] Marc Collet, “Britain Is Ruled by Zionists,” Bitchute, October 14, 2022.

[48] Information obtained from LEO AI.

[49] Maurice Samuls, You Gentiles, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2022.

[50] Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority, Howard Allen, 1981.

[51] Arthur R. Butz, The Hoax of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry, London: Armreg Ltd, 2024 (5th edition); Holocaust Encyclopedia, Uncensored and Unrestrained, 2025. Sponsored by the Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust (www.CODOH.com); Nicholas Kollerstrom, Breaking the Spell. The Holocaust, Myth & Reality, London: Armreg Ltd, 2024;

Jared Taylor, Paved with Good Intentions: The Failure of Race Relations in Contemporary America, Carroll & Graf Pub, 1993; Kerry Bolton, PhD, The Tyranny of Human Rights. From Jacobinism to the United Nations, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2021.

[52]Thomas Dalton, PhD, “Democracy Is an Ideal Government for Jewish Influence,” The Occidental Observer, March 25, 2024.

[53] Kevin Macdonald, PhD, The Culture of Critique. An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Antelope Hill Publishing, 3rd Edition, 2025; Anthony M. Ludovici, The Specious Origins of Liberalism. The Genesis of a Delusion, Ostara Publications, 2015.

[54] Ricardo Duchesne, PhD, “Why the West Is Replacing Its White Population. The Post-Fordist Trap,” The Unz Review, May 15, 2026; John Taylor Gatto, Dumbing Us Down: The Hidden Curriculum of Compulsory Schooling, New Society Publishers, 2002.

[55] Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine. The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, Metropolitan Books, 2007;

Tim Ball, PhD, The Deliberate Corruption of Climate Science, Stairway Press, 2014. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., The Real Anthony Fauci. Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, Skyhorse Publishing, 2021.

[56] The best book I have read on the subject of banks and how they control the economy and destroy nations is by a French jurist and fiscal lawyer Valérie Bugault, Les raisons cachées du désordre mondial. Analyse de géopolitique économique, juridique et monétaire (The Hidden Causes of Global Turmoil: An Analysis of Economic, Legal, and Monetary Geopolitics), Sigest, 2021. She is very active on YouTube and with automatic translation you have access to her ideas. For French speakers, she also published a small pocket book, which is a synthesis of the above book, Demain dès l’aube… le renouveau (Tomorrow at dawn… a new beginning), Sigest, 2023.

[57] Maurice G. Baxter, Henry Clay and the American System, University Press of Kentucky, November 19, 2004.

[58] American investment banker and former public official with a background in finance and government service, Catherine Austin Fitts, appeared on the Tucker Carlson Show to talk about the global control grid; her February 27, 2026, appearance is titled “Catherine Fitts: Epstein, CIA Black Budget, the Control Grid, and the Banks’ Role in War.” In this episode, Fitts argues that major banks and central bankers are constructing the infrastructure of programmable money, global digital IDs, and surveillance hardware to merge monetary and fiscal policy, effectively bypassing democratic legislatures.

[59] Kerry Bolton, PhD, The Banking Swindle. Money Creation and the State, Black House Publishing, 2017.

[60] For a good explanation on how bankers start all wars and put small businesses and innovators out of the loop, see this interview of German economist Richard Werner on the YouTube Tucker Carlson channel: “Every Major War Begins Under False Pretenses & the Central Banks Are Behind It. Economist Explains,” May 22, 2026.

[61] Catherine Austin Fitts, “Catherine Fitts: Epstein, CIA Black Budget, the Control Grid, and the Banks’ Role in War,” The Tucker Carlson Show, Feb 27, 2026.

[62] The most cited and foundational reference on 15-minute cities is the work of Professor Carlos Moreno from the Sorbonne, who coined the term in 2016 and formalized it in a 2021 paper titled “Introducing the ‘15-Minute City’: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities.”  His concept defines a 15-minute city as an urban planning model where all essential services—work, education, healthcare, recreation—are accessible within a 15-minute walk or bike ride from home. Information obtained from LEO AI.

[63] Michael Higger, PhD, The Jewish Utopia, The Lord Baltimore Press, 1932; Gearóid Ó COLMÁIN, “Rothschild’s ‘Slaughter Ships.’ Coercive Engineered Migration: Zionism’s War on Europe (Part 4 of 11),” Dissident Voice, 2016. Cited by Scott HOWARD, The Open Society Playbook, Antelope Hill Publishing, p. 223.

[64] Anthony M. Ludovici, Who Is to Be Master of the World. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Friedrich Nietzche, Legare Street Press (first published in 1914 by T.N. Foulis).

 

Haaretz op-ed: Israel doesn’t have to change. You do.

/24 Comments/in /by

After Bondi, It’s Time for the Australian Left to Accept the Jewish Community Just as It Is

A woman stands at a flower tribute at Bondi Beach on in Sydney, Australia.
A woman stands at a flower tribute at Bondi Beach on in Sydney, Australia. Credit: Mark Baker/AP

The Australian left must understand how profoundly the Holocaust shaped the Jewish community’s relationship with Israel and stop treating Zionism with such hostility – lest more Jews be reduced to labels like ‘that Zionist bitch,’ as I was

With the first block of public hearings into the “lived experience” of antisemitism in Australia – part of the royal commission established after December’s mass shooting at a Sydney Hanukkah event – came the testimony of a university student in Canberra whose roommates asked her to move out after October 7 because they were uncomfortable living with a Zionist.

This testimony was utterly unsurprising. My own time at the University of Sydney ended with the campus’ most prominent and promising progressives referring to me among themselves as “that Zionist bitch.” This was in 2018.

The commission has focused heavily on the surge in antisemitism since October 2023. But the intellectual and moral rot surrounding Israel had been building for years in large circles of the progressive left; all the Hamas attack did was allow ideas and attitudes that once lived only on its fringes to go mainstream. And confronting those attitudes at this moment is politically painful.

Of course, the political extremes on the right have also become increasingly emboldened and more active since October 7, as recorded by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. That said, Australia’s main neo-Nazi group – the National Socialist Network, aka “White Australia” – has little public support or influence.

Haaretz Opinions

Read the opinions shaping debate in Israel and beyond

October 7th commemoration in Sydney, Australia, last year.

October 7th commemoration in Sydney, Australia, last year. Credit: Rick Rycroft/AP

Regardless, the commission has heard testimony of Jewish children being confronted with swastikas at school and with peers proclaiming “Heil Hitler.” Swastikas carved into trees. Swastikas spray-painted on the street.

But condemning neo-Nazis is easy. Denouncing swastikas carries no real political risk.

What is much harder – and requires political courage – is confronting the antisemitism that now circulates comfortably in left-wing and even mainstream spaces: the kind that is socially rewarded and popular, but also deniable.

It manifests when Jewish authors cannot secure spots on festival panels for reasons that can always be explained away: The authors of “Ruptured,” a collection of essays written by Australian Jewish women in response to October 7, have been rejected from all but one of the country’s major writers’ festivals.

It manifests when students quietly cut ties with Jewish friends because they’re “Zionists” and must naturally support genocide and ethnic cleansing. In the colleagues who stopped speaking to you after you expressed empathy for the hostages in Gaza.

This is the antisemitism that has flourished in Australia in recent years precisely because it can be so easy to dismiss as happenstance or legitimize as reasonable. But it is neither coincidence nor fair, it others Jews and makes it acceptable to exclude and socially punish them.

The unwillingness of Australian politicians to confront this form of antisemitism was epitomized by the prime minister’s reaction to the Bondi massacre. Getting Anthony Albanese to establish a royal commission after 15 people were shot dead during a Hanukkah event at Sydney’s most famous beach was like pulling teeth. And the reaction to the commission itself has revealed how little has changed exactly where it most needs to when it comes to certain attitudes toward Jews.

In March, the former head of Australia’s domestic spy service, Dennis Richardson, abruptly resigned as special adviser to the commission. Asked why on ABC Radio Canberra, he replied: “To be very blunt, I was being way overpaid for what I was doing.”

Australia's antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal stands next to Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, his wife Jodie Haydon and Governor-General of Australia Sam Mostyn at the vigil in Sydney, Sunday.

Australia’s antisemitism envoy Jillian Segal stands next to Australia’s Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, his wife Jodie Haydon and Governor-General of Australia Sam Mostyn at the vigil in Sydney, Sunday. Credit: Hollie Adams/Reuters

The mention of money in the same breath as a royal commission into antisemitism was bemusing enough. But the reactions to one post on The Daily Aus – with some comments receiving hundreds of likes – morphed into a twisted display of utter contempt and antisemitic dog whistles.

One of the most popular responses asked: “Why are Jews singled out for special treatment? Shouldn’t it be general racism rather than antisemitism?” Another wondered: “Did he mean he was not agreeing with the Israel lobby on the outrageous new definition of antisemitism and the implications for civil liberties in Australia?” And another suggested he had “probably found out who was really behind Bondi and can’t handle it.”

So far, the commission appears to be deepening resentment precisely among the very people who most misunderstand contemporary antisemitism. Meanwhile, politicians continue to condemn antisemitism in the safest, vaguest and most socially acceptable way possible, avoiding being explicit on the more pervasive manifestations that have become embedded in parts of Australian society.

Demonstrators gather in Melbourne, Australia, Monday, to protest the visit to Australia by Israeli President Isaac Herzog.
Demonstrators gather in Melbourne, Australia, Monday, to protest the visit to Australia by Israeli President Isaac Herzog. Credit: Joel Carrett/AP

Years before October 7, when I advocated for Jewish students at council meetings, I was always careful not to wrestle with the criticism they leveled at Israel itself. Instead, I tried to explain how the language they used, demonizing the Jewish state, could affect Jewish students on their own campus. I thought my approach, illuminating the history and plight of the Jewish people, might create an environment in which these young progressives might appreciate and consider my perspective.

It didn’t. I became “that Zionist bitch” to them all.

Now the Jewish Australians who testified to the commission have themselves reported a sharp rise in online harassment and intimidation since going public with their experiences. What does all of this portend? Nothing good.

The Australian left must confront this with an open mind and a willingness to listen to the 86 percent of Australian Jews who believe that Israel’s existence is an essential part of the Jewish people’s future. It must reckon with the fact that Australia is home to the largest concentration of Holocaust survivors per capita outside of Israel. The Australian left must understand how the Holocaust has profoundly shaped the Jewish community’s relationship to Israel and dare to stop treating Zionism with such vicious hostility when most Australian Jews see themselves as Zionists.

If the left cannot muster the compassion to accept its Jewish community just as it is, worse things than Bondi Beach are sure to follow.

Kevin DeAnna and Millennia Woes on the Henry Nowak Murder

/20 Comments/in /by

American Renaissance: Kevin DeAnna and Millennia Woes on the Henry Wauck Murder

Aporia: The Myth of Assimilation

/1 Comment/in /by

Aporia: The Myth of Assimilation

Unpacking the narrative around Ellis Island immigration

Written by Alden Whitfeld and Arctotherium.

Jason Richwine coined the term “Irish Retort” to describe one of the most common tactics deployed in debates over immigration. Raise any concerns about mass immigration today and the response is automatic: “What about the Irish!”

When Irish immigrants arrived in America in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, they were poor, Catholic (as opposed to Protestant) and heavily overrepresented in crime. Nativists panicked then too. Yet over time, the Irish assimilated, climbed up the social ladder, and became indistinguishable from the average American. The implication is clear, though usually left unstated: today’s immigrants will follow the same arc, and any claim to the contrary is just recycled bigotry.

It’s a neat story, rhetorically powerful and emotionally satisfying. The problem is what it leaves out. Careful studies using multi-generational data show that differences in social outcomes are much more persistent than is commonly assumed. What appears to be rapid convergence is often an artifact of looking too narrowly or too briefly. With this in mind, let’s examine how well the story of rapid European assimilation holds up.

To begin with, the story rests on a quiet omission: a very large share of European immigrants didn’t assimilate at all. They went home.

Between roughly 1850 and 1920, return migration was a defining feature of transatlantic mobility. The return rate of European immigrants during this period was 25–40%. In some decades it reached 60–75% (Bandiera et al., 2013). Italians are the canonical case: between 1890 and 1920, more than half returned to Italy (Klein, 1983). This return migration was negatively selected — the poorer and less successful immigrants were the most likely to leave (Abramitzky et al., 2019). What we now remember as “successful assimilation” is partly explained by survivorship bias. America did not lift entire populations into the middle class. It retained those who were already capable of doing well and quietly shed the rest.1

This selection process radically alters how we interpret the observed convergence in outcomes. Abramitzky et al. (2014) show that most European immigrant groups that arrived in the early twentieth century, including the Irish, Italians and Russians, already had above-average incomes in the first generation. (There was often little difference between first- and second-generation outcomes.) It is not difficult to turn a group into a success story when many of its poorest members voluntarily leave.

Average earnings relative to U.S. natives. Source.

Even after accounting for selection, European economic differences did not evaporate entirely. Using a unique three-generation dataset linking immigrant grandfathers in 1880 to their grandsons in 1940, Ward (2020) finds substantial persistence in occupational income across European ethnicities. As this is the first study to use linked grandparent-grandson data, it demonstrates that intergenerational correlations are stronger when measured properly. As Ward notes, his findings cut directly against the “melting pot” narrative in which ethnic differences fade within a generation or two. They don’t.

Persistence of incomes across European ethnicities. Source.

Nor did immigrants simply arrive as blank slates and then absorb American culture. They brought their values, habits and norms with them, and these left durable imprints on the places where they settled. We understand this intuitively when it comes to cuisine: Italians didn’t just eat pasta themselves; they taught Americans to eat pasta.2 But the same logic applies in other domains.

Continues: The Myth of Assimilation – Aporia

Report: Pentagon Puts Israeli Spying on U.S. Risk at Highest Level, Sources Say

/6 Comments/in /by

Editorial note: Israel unhappy with any indication that peace is in the offing. Boots on the ground and a forever war for Israel. And a continuation of the decades-long campaign to spy on the U.S.

Haaretz: The Pentagon circulated an internal memo that Israel may be monitoring senior U.S. officials to obtain information about internal deliberations on the war with Iran, NBC reported

The Pentagon has raised its counterintelligence threat assessment for Israel to the highest level, citing concerns that the close U.S. ally has stepped up efforts to spy on American officials, according to a report on NBC citing two current U.S. officials and a former official.

The Defense Intelligence Agency recently issued a classification at the highest level in an internal assessment amid rising tensions over the war with Iran, while Israel denied the allegations, according to the report.

According to the sources, the move stems from tensions between Israel and the U.S. regarding the continuation of the war with Iran, as well as concerns within the Pentagon that Israel may be seeking to monitor senior U.S. officials to obtain information about internal deliberations on the issue.

The Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency published a seven-page report, assessing that Israel’s human and technical espionage capabilities are at a “critical level”, according to NBC, citing a current U.S. official.

Current and former diplomats and national security officials said Israel has long been viewed within Washington as an aggressive intelligence-gathering actor, even targeting the United States. The issue has remained a recurring concern among American security and diplomatic circles, with U.S. intelligence agencies continuing to keep a close watch on it. As mentioned in the NBC report, senior U.S. officials traveling to Israel often adopt enhanced security measures, including the use of temporary electronic devices and heightened discretion in private conversations.

A spokesperson for the Israeli embassy in Washington called the report “completely false.”

“Israel does not collect intelligence on U.S. entities, and certainly not on government employees,” the spokesperson told NBC. “Israel’s intelligence-gathering efforts are directed at its adversaries, not its allies. Any claim to the contrary is based on misinformation or is being promoted for political reasons.”

The Pentagon declined to comment on NBC’s inquiry. A senior White House official described the report as false, saying it originated from someone “who does not know what is going on.”

Matt Goodwin: Nigel Farage isn’t the problem. The political class is the problem.

/12 Comments/in /by

Nigel Farage isn’t the problem. The political class is the problem.

I do not usually write several pieces on the same story. But I genuinely believe that the murder of Henry Nowak represents a watershed moment in modern Britain.

Already, among the British people, the horrific murder and treatment of Henry has sparked a widespread and intensifying debate in the country.

Many people are now asking entirely legitimate questions.

Why are police officers in this country taught to react differently to crimes depending on whether they involve ethnic minorities or people from the white majority?

What happened to people being treated equally before the law, irrespective of their racial, ethnic, or religious background?

And why are perverse ideologies from America that promote anti-British, anti-Western, and anti-white ideas now circulating widely among not only the police but schools, universities, the health service, media, government, and more?

But while millions of Brits are asking these important and valid questions, what we also learned this week is that the ruling class clearly does not want to have this debate.

Rather than engage seriously with the concerns and grievances that are being voiced out there, by the silent majority, Prime Minister Keir Starmer and countless Members of Parliament instead chose to retreat into their comfort zone by blaming the one person who was forcing these questions onto the agenda: Nigel Farage.

When Nigel Farage, leader of Reform UK, stood up during Prime Minister’s Questions this week to voice his entirely justifiable concerns about “two-tier policing”, he was widely jeered, criticised, and attacked in the House of Commons.

Keir Starmer, Tory party leader Kemi Badenoch, and leader of Restore, Rupert Lowe, all accused Farage of exploiting the tragedy and creating division.

Countless MPs hit the media to say Nigel Farage is being irresponsible. To say he is disrespecting the Nowak family. To criticise him for “politicising” the issue.

As commentator Konstantin Kisin quipped, if you listened to the British media this week you’d think Henry Nowak was killed by Nigel Farage’s comments.

But millions of ordinary people will have seen something else. They will have spent much of this week witnessing blatant, overwhelming, unavoidable hypocrisy.

Only six years ago, when George Floyd was killed in Minneapolis, in 2020, almost every single one of these same politicians adopted a radically different tone.

Keir Starmer declared that George Floyd’s death, in America, “should be the catalyst for change” here in Britain. London Mayor Sadiq Khan said Floyd’s death had “rightly ignited fury and anguish” around the world.

And Labour’s Shabana Mahmood, who castigated Farage in the House this week, six years ago told her constituents: “I share their anger at this unspeakable outrage.”

Notice the language. “Rightly”. “Fury.” “Anger.” “Share”. “A catalyst for change.”

Six years ago, the ruling class in Westminster told Britain and the world that public outrage over racism and policing should not only be voiced and heard but amplified, respected and acted upon by every institution in British society.

That’s what happened.

We all lived through it. We all saw it. We all felt it. And we all watched the political, media, and cultural class bend over backwards to impose major changes.

But today, in sharp contrast, the reaction to an eerily similar case – the death of a young man amidst police incompetence and while muttering the exact same words (“I can’t breathe”) – could hardly be more different.

This time, the very same people who immediately ‘took the knee’ for a revolutionary, anti-Western, anti-democratic, and anti-white organisation now tell us “it is very important not to politicise a personal tragedy” or “cause division”.

This time, the very same people who used the death of a career criminal in America to justify a full-blown cultural revolution in the West tell us “we must restrain ourselves so as to respect the wishes of the Nowak family” (although, interestingly, when the mother of Rhiannon Whyte, who was stabbed to death by an illegal migrant, called for an end to illegal migration Starmer did not want respect the wishes of that family).

This time, the very same MPs who supported or even joined Black Lives Matter protests and riots on the streets of our capital city while openly breaking Covid laws publicly condemn any similar disturbances and riots relating to Henry Nowak.

And this time, the political class and their allies in the media have made it crystal clear that the only response they consider proper and socially acceptable is the very opposite to what followed Black Lives Matter only six years ago.

Righteous anger? Not allowed. Protesting on the streets? Not this time. Expressing rage? You should be ashamed of yourself. Wanting the tragedy to become a “catalyst for change” to two-tier policing? I’m afraid now you’ll find that the very same people who only six years ago tried to have us believe that every single institution in British society was “institutionally racist” now say “two-tier policing” could not possibly exist.

In fact, this week the British people were put in the utterly absurd position of being told by Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer and his deputy David Lammy that “two-tier policing does not exist” while on the very same day the country’s most senior police chiefs admitted in The Times newspaper they were “reviewing controversial guidance advising officers to treat ethnic minorities differently”.

In other words, the very same politicians who tried to introduce more lenient prison sentences for criminals from minority backgrounds now want you to believe that two-tier justice “does not exist”. Clearly, there are no limits to the extent to which the political class will try and gaslight the British people.

Even Starmer’s cynical use of the Nowak family is outrageous.

If you go back and actually listen to what Henry’s father, Mark Nowak, said, he was very careful to point to Henry’s “inhumane” and “degrading” treatment by the police and contrast it with the “decency” with which they treated his murderer, Vikrum Digwa. He was very clearly pointing to two-tier policing while also underlining his determination to use this appalling tragedy to “make change for the better”.

The entirely legitimate question that must now be asked and debated across the country is how to make that change for the better. I have made some suggestions, as have many others, including Nigel Farage and Reform UK. But Keir Starmer, Labour, and much of the political class clearly do not want us to have this debate at all.

Why? Because what we are witnessing is exactly the same playbook the political class used after Brexit, the Manchester Evening News Arena bombing, the murder of Sir David Amess, the grooming gangs, and the Southport atrocity.

Rather than engage seriously with the underlying issue, with the actual issue, the political class now only tries to police the reaction to these events. It has become hopelessly and profoundly out-of-touch with the people it claims to serve.

Brexit? Don’t lower immigration, restore sovereignty, and help left behind people. Blame Nigel Farage, Cambridge Analytica, and deride voters as gammons and racists.

The Manchester bombing? Don’t address Islamism and stop importing people who hate us. Blame “division” and sing songs about not looking back in anger.

Sir David Amess? Definitely. Do. Not. Mention. Islamism. Blame social media and distract everybody with a debate about “online safety”.

The grooming gangs? Don’t hold an immediate statutory inquiry into the worst scandal in British history before crushing every grooming gang in the country.

Blame Tommy Robinson, Nigel Farage, and Elon Musk for “whipping up division” while hoping that nobody notices there is still no inquiry and the gangs remain rife.

Southport? Don’t fix the borders, end mass immigration and stop importing people from radically different cultures who glorify violence. Once again, blame Nigel Farage and ‘far-right thugs’ while clamping down on free speech.

Henry Nowak? Don’t acknowledge and address the blatant two-tier policing that led officers to prioritise allegations of racial abuse over doing their job properly. Instead, blame Nigel Farage once again and warn everybody else not to “cause division”.

Time and time again, we see the same pattern. A political class that has become so weak, so cowardly, and so desperate to distract people from scrutinising its own legacy that it is now more determined to try and turn this into a debate about Nigel Farage or Elon Musk rather than acknowledge and deal with the underlying issue.

What we are witnessing is a political class, a regime, that is rapidly losing control of the narrative and is desperately trying to regain it – if not impose it.

But this strategy, as we can see from the aftermath of Southport to events this week, is simply no longer working because more and more people can see, with their own eyes, what is happening to the country.

What millions of people can see, clearly, is that the debate over Henry Nowak is not simply a debate over Nigel Farage. It is about how some groups are being treated more favourably than others. It is about how only some grievances are considered legitimate while others are caricatured, mocked and dismissed. And it is about how the same standards and level of respect are no longer shown to different groups.

The longer Keir Starmer and the political class refuse to engage seriously and honestly with these concerns about what is actually happening to Britain, the more they and the wider system will lose people’s trust and confidence.

This is what has been building up slowly but relentlessly in the system — through the debates over Brexit, the grooming gangs, the Islamist bombings, Southport, mass immigration, broken borders, Muslim sectarianism and more — a growing awareness among millions of ordinary people out there in the country that the system is simply no longer interested in dealing with the things that are actually tearing Britain apart.

Worse, it is now only interested in managing the reaction to these things through a draconian clampdown on free speech, free expression, and free debate.

This is a very dangerous place for any society to be. The more people withdraw their trust and confidence, the weaker the system will become before, inevitably, at some point in the not-too-distant future, collapsing altogether.

This, more than anything else, is why the murder of Henry Nowak may prove to be a watershed moment in British politics. Because it has pulled back the curtain to reveal just how out-of-touch and self-serving the political regime has become.

The only question is whether the regime will now turn back and address the underlying issues that are tearing our country apart before it really is too late.

As always, I’d welcome your comments. I’m looking forward to joining our Paid subscribers at our weekly Live discussion at 2pm today on the Substack App.

 

White Girls Raped By Dogs, Whisky Bottles, & 100s Of Men: Britain’s Migrant Grooming-Gang Scandal Exposed

/9 Comments/in /by

More evidence of the systemic anti-White racism that pervades the UK, as in the case of the murder of Henry Nowak. Rupert Lowe is the best politician UK has to offer.

White Girls Raped By Dogs, Whisky Bottles, & 100s Of Men: Britain’s Migrant Grooming-Gang Scandal Exposed

Restore Britain leader Rupert Lowe used a Westminster Hall debate on Monday to confront MPs with harrowing testimony from White girls and women who were raped, tortured, trafficked, and degraded by migrant grooming gangs, and abandoned by the very authorities that should have protected them.

The debate was secured after 260,974 Brits signed a petition calling for Parliament to address the rape gang scandal. Lowe opened by thanking the signatories and welcoming survivors who were sitting in the hall, saying the debate was not about politics, but about them.

“I want the world to hear what we heard during the two weeks of our independent rape gang inquiry hearings, an inquiry that should never have needed to happen,” Lowe said.

He then read out a series of graphic testimonies that exposed the scale of the abuse suffered by almost exclusively White girls.

One survivor said she was only “about 12, nearly 13” when a man raped her before forcing an empty Jack Daniel’s bottle inside her and breaking the glass. Another described being held down by groups of men as they took turns to rape her, before beating her and threatening to kill her and harm her loved ones if she ever spoke out.

Lowe told MPs that the evidence heard by his inquiry included repeated allegations that White British girls were deliberately targeted.

One survivor said abusers made constant references to “White girls” and “Christian girls,” claiming they had “fewer morals or lower values,” while Muslim girls were described as having “dignity and higher moral standing.”

Another alleged victim said race “did play a part” in the selection of victims, adding that the girls she encountered during her exploitation were “almost exclusively White.”

The testimony also included claims that children in care were effectively handed over to abusers. One survivor said men would sound a car horn outside a children’s home before a staff member brought a child to the front door. Another said, “It was all of the White girls in every home that I went to.”

In one of the most disturbing accounts read to MPs, a survivor recalled seeing the back of a van opened to reveal “15, 20 girls locked in dog cages.” Another said dogs were brought in during an attack while men stood around filming, laughing, and betting on what would happen. She said she had nowhere to move and was raped by a dog while a man held her face and stared into her eyes because “he wanted to see me break.”

Lowe also read testimony from a survivor who said she was raped by “probably about six or seven hundred different men” over three years after the abuse began when she was 13. Another said abuse escalated around Eid and holidays, when parties became “bigger, worse, and “more violent,” with more men and more girls involved.

The Restore Britain leader claimed that institutions had repeatedly failed victims. One girl said she went to hospital at 15, bleeding, swollen, and unable to sit down after an assault, but was given tablets and discharged after telling staff her drink had been spiked because she was too frightened to say what had really happened. “They did not ask any questions,” she said.

Another survivor alleged that she was raped by multiple police officers in different parts of the country. A further testimony claimed a man put a cigarette out on a baby’s face.

Lowe said the abuse was also used to attack the faith and identity of victims. One Christian survivor said her cross was used as a way to break her down, with abusers asking, “Where is your God now? Has your God forsaken you?”

The politician said he could have continued reading testimony “for hours and hours,” warning that Parliament no longer had any excuse for inaction.

“All of us in this building have a responsibility to finally act. Not to talk, but to act,” he said. “Our Rape Gang Inquiry report will be released in the coming days. It will change Britain for good.”

Lowe launched his own independent inquiry before the U.K. government announced a statutory national investigation into grooming gangs, a probe that identified evidence of child sexual exploitation across dozens of local authority areas.