Mark’s Manchester Mendacity: And Gideon’s Guide for Gullible Goyim

Mark Steyn can’t help himself. When he talks about Jews, he tells lies. He was at again after two Jews were killed when a Muslim attacked a synagogue in Manchester. Steyn had a stern warning for his readers: “Dead Jews are, ever and always, merely the warm-up act for dead infidels more generally.” That was two lies in one: first, the lie that Muslims harm Jews before they harm non-Jews; second, the lie that Steyn has no special concern for Jews. In fact, he always works to advance Jewish interests and misleads goyim about Jewish behavior. But he said that Jews are “merely” the ones harmed first.

22 Dead Goyim, Manchester 2017: “Don’t look back in anger…”

First? Does that mean time is running in reverse in Manchester? As I described in “Manchester Malady,” twenty-two people died in a Muslim suicide-bombing there in 2017. Not one of them was Jewish. And is time running in reverse in London too? Fifty-two people died in four Muslim suicide-bombings there in 2005. Again, none were Jewish that I’ve ever heard. Then you’ve got the eight people killed by Muslims on London Bridge in 2017 and the three killed by a Muslim in Reading in 2020. Plus all the other goyim murdered in ones and twos by Muslims down the decades, like the White schoolboy Kriss Donald, incinerated by Muslims in 2004, and the White schoolgirl Charlene Downes, chopped up by Muslims in 2003.

Two Dead Jews, Manchester 2025: “Jews are the canaries in the coal-mine! Strong action now!”

That’s hundreds of dead goyim and no or very few dead Jews by 2025. But Mark Steyn still claims that “dead Jews are merely the warm-up act.” He also claims that imported Muslims “pose challenges that would otherwise not have existed — for uncovered women in Oslo, for gays in Amsterdam, for Jews everywhere.” Tell me, Mark: Where are the Jews being “challenged” in the rape-gang redoubts of Rotherham, Telford and Rochdale? Did you meet any Jews when you visited Rotherham to interview a few of the thousands of young shiksas who have been raped and tortured there by Muslims? You know, the White girls you described as being “doused in [gasoline]” while Muslim men “danced around” them “taunting [them] with lit matches”?

Jews first, Goyim nowhere

Mark Steyn couldn’t interview Laura Wilson, of course, because she had been murdered by her Muslim abusers in 2010. Time is running in reverse in Rotherham too. It’s not a Jewish place and very few Jews live there or even pass through. Strangely enough, however, Jews were foremost in the concerns of the Labour MP for Rotherham, the slug-like Denis MacShane. Indeed, for MacShane Jews came first and goyim came nowhere. When he was jailed for fraud in 2013, the Jewish Chronicle saluted him as “one of the community’s greatest champions.” That’s the Jewish community, of course. Does the Chronicle care that MacShane ignored the rape-gangs and betrayed the White working-class “community” he was elected to serve?

Dr Denis MacShane, Rotherham MP and Jewish champion; Laura Wilson, Rotherham shiksa abused and murdered while MacShane worked for Jews (images from Wikipedia and London Times)

Not in the slightest. After all, who matters but Jews? However, Jews and their shabbos goyim will often feign concern for others in order to advance Jewish interests. The part-Jewish shabbos goy Mark Steyn did that after Manchester when he said dead Jews are “merely the warm-up act.” The fully Jewish Gideon Falter did it after Manchester too. He’s the Chief Executive of the Campaign Against Antisemitism and he was feigning concern in the Daily Telegraph. Here is his guide for gullible goyim on how to think about the Manchester murders:

In the early days of coal mining, canaries were placed in mineshafts to warn miners of the build-up of dangerous gases that affected the birds shortly before the humans, giving the miners a chance to save themselves. If the canaries fell silent, there was no time to lose.

It has long been said that Jews are civilisation’s canaries in the coal mine. That adage has been proven right almost exactly as many times as it has been ignored.

While miners had no trouble grasping that if the canaries ceased to breathe, soon they would too, it seems harder to explain the truth of the warning that “What begins with the Jews never ends with the Jews”.

Many in Britain have noticed that something is awry lately. Extreme ideologies are increasingly expressed more confidently, with young people espousing politics that cast Britain as the villain and those who wish our country harm as heroes.

Society’s canaries have warned of these dangers for over a decade. When we founded Campaign against Antisemitism in 2014, it was amidst a wave of hatred fuelled by Islamist and far-Left extremism, and emboldened by police and regulators that were more likely to appease than use their powers. That wave of hatred and appeasement never subsided; it has built up, not organically, but through the determination of well-organised extremists whose entryism and propaganda our institutions are too gentle to repel. (“What Jews are facing today will face the whole country tomorrow,” The Daily Telegraph, 6th September 2025)

Gideon guides the gullible goyim (image of Gideon Falter from Good Morning, Britain)

Ah, the good old “canaries in the coal mine.” You see, the poor, powerless Jews always suffer first from Muslim hatred and violence, which is why they selflessly warn currently unharmed Whites that Muslims will attack Whites next. That’s why Gideon Falter solemnly tells us “What begins with the Jews never ends with the Jews” and “What Jews are facing today will face the whole country tomorrow.” Like Mark Steyn, he’s telling obvious and easily disprovable lies. Falter says: “Many in Britain have noticed that something is awry lately.” Do the 1950s count as “lately”? That was when Muslims were already conducting outreach to White girls in London and other British cities: “That night Mary had her first clients. She was auctioned as a virgin, and the highest bidder got her first, with eight others following after.” And what about 1960? Does that count as “lately” too?

On New Year’s Day 1960, three men were shot and killed and two wounded in a mass shooting at the East House public house in Sheffield, England. The killer was Mohamed Ismail, [an unemployed Somali labourer] from the colony of British Somaliland. Ismail had earlier expressed a desire to end his life but thought that suicide was not an option due to his religious beliefs. He committed the shooting in the hope that he would be arrested and sentenced to death by a British court.

[After the shooting,] Ismail barricaded himself into the pub’s toilet and was arrested there by two unarmed police constables, Gilbert Robertson and Denis Hastings. After being remanded in custody, he was determined to be insane and detained at Broadmoor Hospital for 22 months. Ismail was deported to Somalia after his release, and there he went on to shoot a judge before being killed following another mass shooting in which he killed several people. (“East House mass shooting,” Wikipedia)

Three Dead Goyim, Sheffield 1960, victims of a psychotic Somali (image from Sheffield Star)

Britain learned in 1960 that Somali Muslims are very good at two things: violent crime and living off welfare. So what happened at the turn of the century when “more than 200,000” Somalis sought residence in Britain? Well, because “most were untrained and would be dependent on welfare, the Home Office could have refused them entry.” But the immigration minister Barbara Roche granted them “exceptional leave to remain.” Does Roche care that the Somali newcomers promptly followed the lead of their Pakistani Muslim forerunners and began to form rape-gangs in cities like Bristol? Again, not in the slightest. Non-White predation on Whites is a feature, not a bug, for migration mavens like Roche. After all, she “entered politics — she still emphasises this today — to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” In other words, she’s one of the many Jews who regard Muslims as “natural allies” against historically Christian Whites.

Sue Berelowitz, the Jew “paid off with £134k after failing to speak out about” Pakistani rape-gangs, then “rehired as a consultant on £1k a DAY” (image from The Jewish Chronicle)

Another of those Islamophile Jews is Sue Berelowitz, the so-called Children’s Commissioner who did her best to conceal the huge over-representation of non-White Muslims in sex-crimes against White girls. Muslims and other non-Whites have been murdering, raping, parasitizing and generally blighting the lives of Whites for many decades. Jews have played a central role both in organizing the non-White immivasion and in suppressing White resistance to it. It’s no coincidence that Whites arrested during the so-called Notting Hill race-riots in 1958 found themselves up before a Jewish judge called Cyril Salmon (1903–99), who sent them off to years in jail for resisting the invasion of their homeland by low-IQ Black criminals and tax-eaters. Salmon was later made into a Baron, rising even higher in the hostile elite that imposed non-White migration on unwilling British Whites.

Rapists and wife-beaters

That was an example of how, in the lying words of Jake Wallis Simons at Spiked, “Jews have always stood up for Britain.” No, Jews like Simons have always stood up for Jewish interests, from importing non-Whites as “natural allies” to censoring, demonizing and jailing White dissidents to looting the pension funds of Whites in Britain while working tirelessly for Mossad and Israel. The pension-fund looter was Binyamin Hoch, who operated under the nom de goy of Robert Maxwell. Hoch was also a wife-beater, child-beater and sexual predator. All of those traits — financial predation, cruelty and rape — are characteristic of the “community” from which Hoch emerged. It’s a community that was spotlighted by the Jewish Chronicle a few days before the attack on Jews in Manchester:

Israeli brides are being lured to Britain and matched with violent sex abusers

Dozens of Israeli women living in the UK’s strictly Orthodox community have been brought to Britain to marry abusive men, the JC [Jewish Chronicle] can reveal. These women, some as young as 19, come from Israeli families unable to secure them a match at home and end up in the UK, married to British men with known backgrounds of abuse, violence or severe mental illness. The women are typically born into poorer families affected by illness, disability or divorce — factors that can count against them in the strictly Orthodox shidduch (matchmaking) process. The men, by contrast, belong to wealthier families — but have struggled to find a match because people in their community know their history of abuse, violence, mental health conditions or questions around their sexuality. Matchmakers present the marriages as generous opportunities for the Israeli brides; a chance for women to wed into comfort and stability abroad. […]

In the past six months, six such cases have come to light — but insiders believe the true number could be far higher. One expert helping domestic abuse survivors in the community said she has supported 12 women in similar circumstances in the last year. In written testimony shared with the JC with the women’s permission, three Israeli survivors of abuse at the hands of their strictly Orthodox British husbands share their stories.

Newlywed Chaya [name changed] arrived in the UK for what she thought was her honeymoon. The plan had been to take a short trip to meet her husband’s Dovid’s [name changed] family, then go back to Israel to continue her studies and start married life. “We met and got engaged within weeks,” Chaya said. “Dovid came from a wealthy and respected family in London — that’s what I was told.” Her family was impressed by her new husband’s status: “It seemed important to my father,” Chaya said.

But once the couple landed in London, everything changed. Chaya was taken to a grimy flat and told she would not be returning to Israel. Her passport was taken; there was no phone in the flat; and she was forbidden to drive. Chaya was trapped. Then the violence started. “He told me the UK was our new home and that I should thank him for putting a roof over my head,” Chaya said. “I was so scared of him. Every time I mentioned Israel, he would grow angry and physically assault me, so I learned that if I wanted to stay safe, I should not bring it up.”

But silence was no protection against her husband’s violence, which was worse on Shabbat, when Dovid routinely raped her, she said. […] “He wanted me to have a kid with him so I would never be able to escape him in this lifetime.” After the baby was born, the abuse continued in front of the child; sometimes Chaya was carrying the baby in her arms while Dovid beat her and threw objects at her.

When she finally mustered the courage to show other women her bruises, they rejected her pleas for help and told her to put her arms away — it was not “tznius” (modest) to show her body. Though she maintained an abiding faith in God, Chaya said her faith in the community faded. Because it was not just Dovid who abused Chaya — her husband forced her to have sex with other men for money, she said: “He would tell me that I wasn’t contributing financially to the marriage, and this was the least I could do. He made me watch him have sex with a friend’s wife and told me this was normal behaviour. He was so violent sexually, it was like watching me in pain gave him oxygen to breathe. It made him high.” […]

Rabbanit Ramie Smith has spent the past five years advocating for women like Chaya and others struggling to receive their gets [Jewish divorces]. While awareness of abuse and coercive control is growing, Smith told the JC that Israeli women brought to the UK for strictly Orthodox marriages are especially vulnerable.

“Because these girls have no family or friends to support them here, the culture is vastly different, there’s a language barrier and the majority of them do not even have access to their finances. One thing compounds on top of another which adds to their vulnerability, making them perfect victims for coercive control.”

Smith says the violent sexual abuse to which some women are subjected might leave bruising, “but without an internal examination, and with the stigma of disclosing abuse, the damage often goes unseen.” […]

Marrying a man with severe mental health needs can mean women feel additional layers of entrapment. One woman said her husband sat on a rooftop threatening to jump every day. Another was told by her husband that his clinical psychosis was caused by her desire to wait to have a child, preventing him from fulfilling the mitzvah of procreating.

“My young clients tell me, ‘I’m not a mental health nurse or psychologist, I am not staying with someone to be their carer,’” Smith said. These mental health conditions are often known about within the communities to which the men belong: “When you speak to relatives or friends, or rabbis and teachers, it’s often the case — though not always — that people will say, ‘We knew he was violent. We knew he had mental health issues,’” Smith said.

Yet the matches are arranged by families who believe they are making the right decision for their daughters. Some are deeply troubled when they realise they have guided their children towards an abuser. […]

Responding to the investigation, the victims’ commissioner, Claire Waxman, said: “Too often I hear of women from other countries trafficked into abusive marriages when they do not speak the language, have no support system to turn to and are trapped in violence.

“Perpetrators regularly weaponise their victims’ insecure immigration status, using the threat of arrest or deportation as a means of control. For the Jewish community, the get is harnessed as another form of coercive control, used to perpetuate abuse.”

Waxman said the fear of family courts, “where many women endure further harm and the terrifying prospect of losing their children,” is also troubling. “This is why I have long called for a firewall between the police and immigration enforcement, so victims can report abuse without fear of reprisal. I have also urged for reform of family courts, so abuse is properly identified and women and their children are protected.”

Waxman added, “Rabbis and the community have a crucial role to play in opening pathways to safety for these women. I urge anyone experiencing abuse to seek support. Help is available through organisations such as Jewish Women’s Aid and Lighthouse.”

Meanwhile, Jess Phillips, the minister responsible for safeguarding and violence against women and girls, said: “My thoughts are with the victims whose stories have come to light in this investigation — no one should be trapped in an abusive marriage, isolated from support or denied basic freedoms. That’s why, as part of our mission to halve violence against women and girls, we are introducing new statutory guidance and a legal definition of ‘honour’-based abuse to help identify and respond to these crimes.” (“Israeli brides are being lured to Britain and matched with violent sex abusers,” The Jewish Chronicle, 25th September 2025)

As Kevin MacDonald noted when he saw that story, a very important word is missing. The word is “inbreeding.” Like Muslims, Orthodox Jews are highly inbred, which explains why both “communities” suffer from disproportionate rates of mental illness and other pathologies. All of that imposes huge costs on the White majority and means that Orthodox Jews, like Muslims, are a blight on Britain, not a blessing. But that inbreeding will never be mentioned by officials like Claire Waxman and Jess Phillips, who are, of course, mouthing pious platitudes about the abuse. Nothing will be done and both the abuse and the inbreeding will be ignored when politicians are heaping praise on Jews according to the central principle of minority worship: “Every ethnic minority blesses the vile and undeserving White majority more than every other ethnic minority.”

Claire Waxman, yet another Jewish gatekeeper in high places (image from We Are Survivors)

But there’s more to note in that story. Like the “children’s commissioner” Sue Berelowitz, the “victims’ commissioner” Claire Waxman is Jewish. She’s yet another example of how Jews so often occupy strategic, gatekeeping roles in politics, bureaucracy and the media. And that’s true across the West. These gatekeeping Jews work tirelessly for Jews and against Whites. That helps explain why Orthodox Jews, like Muslims, will have license to continue preying both on their own and on the White majority. Here are some more interesting stories from the Jewish Chronicle and elsewhere (“Charedi” and “Chasidic” refer to Ultra-Orthodox Jews):

∙ Charedi father and son accused of laundering millions through illegal sale of Viagra

∙ Charedi man sentenced to nine years in prison for fraud, theft and laundering more than £10 million

∙ Chasidic leaders approved scam for families to fraudulently claim housing benefit

∙ Man jailed for laundering more than £10m through Jewish charity

∙ Orthodox charities investigated over £22m cheque-cashing scandal

∙ Police make fourth arrest in London over alleged [Charedi] crypto-scam

∙ Rabbi is jailed for £5m fraud

The same kind of psychology, and same kind of genetics, are at work in secular Jewish fraudsters like Bernie Madoff and Robert Maxwell. Such predatory behavior is what is known in Yiddish as a shande far di goyim, “a scandal before the goyim,” so some embarrassed secular Jews try to shame the perpetrators into stopping it. Their efforts are always in vain. Nothing happened after this attempt at shaming appeared in the Jewish Chronicle back in 2021:

In the UK, benefit fraud appears to be endemic in parts of Charedi communities, with housing benefit in particular being manipulated through bogus shell companies and the like in order to support an otherwise unattainable lifestyle [of intense religious study without gainful employment]. This is incompatible with the fundamental Jewish principles of truth, yashrus (being straight) and avoiding falsehood of any kind. […] The biggest problem in all this is that Charedim look so very Jewish. Their obsession with the externals means that to themselves, to the outside world, and even to many other Jews, they appear to be the quintessence of Jewish life. In fact, many of them are the antithesis of fundamental Jewish principles in so many ways. (“The lifestyle of many Charedim has become incompatible with Judaism,” The Jewish Chronicle, 28th January 2021)

The author, Daniel Greenberg, is claiming that the most Jewish Jews are in fact the least Jewish Jews. He’s wrong: those “fundamental Jewish principles of truth, yashrus (being straight) and avoiding falsehood of any kind” are perfectly compatible with benefit fraud, because it isn’t the Jewish in-group who are being defrauded. No, it’s the goyish out-group, responsible, in Jewish eyes, for millennia of anti-Semitic oppression, persecution and massacre.

The biggest Jewish scams of all

However, the worst Jewish scams don’t involve money. Instead, they involve words and laws. Across the West, Jews have run huge and deadly scams telling goyim that they live in a “nation of immigrants,” that “race does not exist” and that “diversity is our strength.” At the same time, Jews have opened the borders to non-Whites, praised, privileged and prioritized the immivaders, demonized White resistance, and passed harsh laws to suppress that resistance. All problems caused by non-Whites are simultaneously blamed on Whites and used to strengthen the security and surveillance state run by Jews.

These massive Jewish scams continue now that non-Whites are harming Jews too, many decades after they began harming Whites. After the attack in Manchester, Jews and their shabbos goyim plugged ludicrous lines like “Jews are the canaries in the coal-mine” and “Dead Jews are, ever and always, merely the warm-up act for dead infidels more generally.” They also bewailed a plague of “anti-Semitism” that was created by Jews themselves. Jews have imported Muslims as “natural allies” and it was a Jew-founded “anti-racist” organization called the Runnymede Trust that popularized the notion of “Islamophobia” in Britain.

Little refugee with interesting name

That’s why Jews and their leftist allies would have said that it was “racist” and “Islamophobic” to oppose the granting of asylum to a family from Syria in 1996. A child in that family had an interesting name: Jihad Al-Shamie, which means “Jihad of Syria” in Arabic. Little Jihad grew up and became the vile anti-Semite who attacked the Manchester synagogue in 2025 and was shot dead by the police. He was on bail for repeatedly raping one of his three wives at the time. He had very probably a police record for other crimes. And if he’d confined himself to raping non-Jewish women and breaking White laws, Jews would have seen absolutely no problem in his presence on British soil.

As it is, Jews now see a big problem with Jihad Al-Shamie, because he finally harmed people who matter, namely Jews. Not that I detected any genuine grief in the response of Jews like Gideon Falter and Jake Wallis Simons to the murders at the synagogue. No, I detected only solipsism, selfishness and a determination to exploit the murders to strengthen Jewish power and control. It was a textbook example of Jewish antifragility. When an ideology or entity is antifragile, it benefits from being attacked and from experiencing adversity. Fragile things break under pressure; antifragile things get stronger.

A house without termites

Jews are exploiting antifragility and increasing their own power when they wail about being victims of the very Muslims they have themselves imported into the West. At Jewish behest, the Labour government will now further attack free speech in Britain and order the police to restrict pro-Palestinian marches. Nick Griffin also suggests that some Jews hope to benefit from the civil wars they’re encouraging between Whites and Muslims in the West.

A few of those fascinating insects known as termites (image from Wikipedia)

If so, it would be yet another example of an officially unspeakable truth: “Jews don’t bless Britain — Jews blight Britain.” The same goes for the non-White “natural allies” whom Jews have imported to predate, parasitize and paralyze Whites. Jake Wallis Simons wouldn’t agree, of course. “What is the West without Jews?” he asked in the Spectator, as he continued to exploit the Manchester murders. His answer: “Sorry, but you can’t have one without the other.” My answer: “The West without Jews is like a house without termites.”

Appendix: How British Jews created the Manchester murders they are now exploiting

• British Jews and Muslims are natural allies, Dr Richard Stone, The Independent, 15th August 2001
• Former CST boss will help Muslim group battle Islamophobia, The Jewish Chronicle, 10th April 2014
• Muslims and Jews face a common threat from white supremacists. We must fight it together, Jonathan Freedland and Mehdi Hasan, The Guardian, 3rd April 2019
• Jewish women ‘stand shoulder to shoulder’ with Muslim women over Islamophobic abuse, The Jewish Chronicle, 19th April 2018
• Jewish and Muslim women pledge to work together to combat hate, The Jewish Chronicle, 24th April 2018
• Jews and Muslims should unite in fight against racism, The Jewish Chronicle, 28th March 2018
• Board president Marie van der Zyl pledges to be ‘committed ally’ of Muslims at interfaith Iftar, The Jewish Chronicle, 13th July 2018
• Our Jewish community must do more to support Muslims attacked by Islamophobes, The Jewish Chronicle, 8th August 2018
• This young Jewish woman and a young Muslim woman teach schoolkids about racism, The Jewish Chronicle, 7th February 2019