Featured Articles

Peter’s Pedophile Pal: The Coprocentric Key to Comprehending Israel, Jews and Jewish History

/6 Comments/in /by

Do you want to understand Israel and Israeli behavior? Then there are two routes you can take, a fast one and a slow one. Taking the slow route, you spend years reading lots of books, learning Hebrew, reading lots more books. Taking the fast route, you just spend a few minutes reading a short article at Neokrat. The article gets Jim Goad badly wrong and Jewish nationhood bullseye right as it explores a fascinating question: “Is Israel Just A Shit-Magnet?” Here’s an extract:

Jim Goad, no friend of this site […], has, from all his tedious writings, gifted the World with the term “shit magnet” for [people who endlessly attract trouble], no doubt with reference to himself. In truth, it is a great concept, because it skips the tedious detail and cuts to the main point — certain people do seem to attract a lot of shit, and usually that tells us more about them than anything else.

Now, with “Israeli problems” once again taking up vital bandwidth — and at a time of real crisis (Ukraine, the threat to Taiwan, the hollowing out of American democracy by moronic populist forces, etc.) — it seems appropriate to apply the term “shit magnet” to the state of Israel.

Of course, Israel is a relatively new state and all new states should be allowed a little leeway to make mistakes and learn from them, but when I compare Israel’s track record with other states of a similar vintage, there can be no doubt about it, Israel is definitely the king of the shit magnets, getting involved in one stupid fracas after another.

Since its foundation in 1948, it has either been involved in stupid wars, pointless occupations, constant infringements of international law, and the constant rubbing up of its neighbours (and occasional friends) the wrong way. […] I am just noticing the general pattern: Israel is just not a “get along” kind of country. It seems to be devoid of a sense of “good form,” constantly “oversteps the mark” (those invisible guide rails of harmonious behaviour), and, maybe even without meaning to do so, rubs up its friends and neighbours entirely the wrong way.

One or two border wars since 1948 and even a temporary occupation or two would have been forgivable, but 18 wars, the occupation of foreign territory for decades, and countless instances of ignoring international law within the last 75 years make it look like it isn’t even trying.

Really, once this framing is accepted, it is impossible to argue that Israel isn’t a total shit magnet. (“Is Israel Just A Shit-Magnet?,” Neokrat, 16th October, 2023)

The article is completely wrong about Jim Goad and completely right about Israel. Nothing Goad writes is “tedious.” But yes, Israel is indeed a total shit-magnet, endlessly involved in trouble, tragedy and trauma. The article is right to say that Israel “rubs up its friends and neighbours entirely the wrong way,” but wrong to add “maybe even without meaning to do so.” Of course Israel means to do so: it behaves badly because it’s arrogant, amoral and completely unconcerned about anyone’s interests but its own.

Hebrew Dindus

Israel is, in short, a collective expression of age-old Jewish psychology. That article at Neokrat doesn’t point out that the term “shit-magnet” also applies perfectly both to individual Jews like the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, endlessly involved in scandals about corruption, and to Jewish history as a whole. The Hebrew Bible could easily be re-titled “Confessions of a Shit-Magnet.” From slavery in Egypt to slavery in Babylon, from Job’s boils to Samson’s blinding, it’s a story of endless trouble for both individual Jews and the Jewish race. Outside the Bible there’s lots more trouble and tragedy: the Jews are persecuted by the Greeks, persecuted by the Romans, persecuted by the Christians and the Muslims; they’re expelled and massacred and finally suffer the ultimate horrors of the Holocaust. And through all that extra-Biblical trouble, they insist that they dindu nuffin’! According to Jews, it’s not bad behavior by Jews that explains why Jews attract so much trouble, it’s the irrational hate and malice of the goyim.

 

Bathrobe Bum-Boy: Peter Mandelson with his pedophile pal Jeffrey Epstein (photo from The Guardian)

A persecuted pedo: the Jewish cyber-spook Tom Alexandrovich flees to Israel

Jews are wrong to auto-exculpate, of course. Their own bad behavior does indeed explain the endless trouble attracted by Jews. Like Israel as a nation, Benjamin Netanyahu is a shit-magnet because he’s crooked, corrupt and completely selfish. Peter Mandelson is a shit-magnet for the same reason. Mandelson is the homosexual half-Jewish politician who’s just lost yet another big job thanks to yet another of the big scandals that have dogged his career. As the Guardian puts it: he “has an extraordinary talent for securing jobs at the top of the government, but an even more extraordinary one for leaving them in a blaze of controversy.” The staunch Friend of Israel Keir Starmer had appointed Mandelson as British ambassador to Washington “despite warnings,” as the Guardian again put it, “over his links with” the late pedophile predator Jeffrey Epstein, who was yet another Jewish shit-magnet. Starmer then had to dismiss Mandelson as ambassador when the links proved even more extensive and enduring than Mandy had admitted. Mandelson called Epstein “my best pal” in a birthday-letter and commiserated with his pedophile pal in an email when the pedo was slapped on the wrist by American justice in 2008: “I think the world of you and I feel hopeless and furious about what has happened. I can still barely understand it. It just could not happen in Britain. You have to be incredibly resilient, fight for early release and be philosophical about it as much as you can.”

An Israeli super-hero

Like Israel bombing America’s ally Qatar, Mandelson showed complete disregard for morality and gentile interests. He cared only about the Jewish predator Epstein, not the under-aged White girls who had been preyed on by Epstein. The two men had been brought together by Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of the Jewish shit-magnet Robert Maxwell, né Binyamin Hoch. Like Mandelson and Netanyahu, Maxwell suffered scandal after scandal during his career. When he was accurately condemned as a crook, he responded by smearing his critics as “anti-Semites” and successfully suing them. Then he fell off his super-yacht and was buried on Israel’s most sacred ground with the highest honors. But he was an even bigger shit-magnet in death than in life. It soon emerged that he had been preying on his own companies and looting the pension funds of his own employees. Did Mossad, Israel’s fearsomely efficient intelligence agency, not know that Maxwell-Hoch had been stealing huge sums from the goyim? Of course it knew. But Israel didn’t care: the mega-fraudster Maxwell was working for Israel, so to Israelis he was a super-hero, not a super-villain.

Here Lies Binyamin Hoch: Mega-fraudster Maxwell is buried on Israel’s most sacred ground (image on Private Eye #781)

Indeed, the mega-fraudster Maxwell was very probably a Mossad agent. So were Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. And if Peter Mandelson isn’t a Mossad agent, he’s certainly worked for Israeli and Jewish interests throughout his own scandal-dogged career. But none of that has been discussed in the mainstream media during the latest shit-storm to erupt around Mandelson. In particular, the mainstream has ignored the glaringly obvious Jewish angle. When Mandelson was involved in a previous scandal about his links with billionaires like Mikhail Fridman and Oleg Deripaska, the mainstream called them “Russian oligarchs.” In fact, they are Jewish oligarchs. And crooks. But I repeat myself. The mainstream got it wrong again when it said Mandelson was appointed ambassador to Washington “despite” his already known links to Epstein. In fact, he was appointed ambassador because of those links, not despite them. Just like the Jew Melinda Simmons, the “British” ambassador to Ukraine appointed by staunch Friend of Israel Teresa May in 2019, Mandelson became an ambassador to serve Jewish and Israeli interests, not British ones.

Mandelson as microcosm

And now that scandal has struck Mandelson yet again, it’s revealed Mandy as microcosm yet again. Mandelson is a shit-magnet as a Jewish individual just as Jews are a shit-magnet as a race and Israel is a shit-magnet as a nation. But Mandelson is more than that. Like Richard Perle in America, he was given the nickname of “Prince of Darkness” by gentiles. Two other prominent Jewish politicians in Britain have received similar nicknames: Michael Howard (né Hect) is “Dracula” and the late Gerald Kaufman, a homosexual like Mandelson, was “Hannibal Lecter.” Whether they know it or not, gentiles are responding to the alien and predatory psychology they sense in Jews.

Parallel punims: the anti-White Jewish journalist Emily Maitlis shares a joke with pedo-pal Peter Mandelson (Twitter)

And what about Israel? Like Netanyahu and Mandelson, Israel is more than just a shit-magnet. I’d call it a vampire among nations. So who’s going to drive a stake through its twisted heart? Well, maybe Israel will self-stake and destroy itself. As E. Michael Jones has repeatedly pointed out: no Jewish kingdom has lasted more than eighty years and the clock is now ticking louder and louder on Israel. It has been “rubbing up its friends and neighbours entirely the wrong way” since 1948, so its eighty years are nearly up. One thing is certain: the copromagnetism will continue. Jews like Peter Mandelson and his pedo-pal Jeffrey Epstein will continue to attract shit wherever they go. And in the end, yes, we goyim are to blame. If any gentile nation allows Jews to have power and influence, shit will ensue. From the rape-gangs of Rotherham to future wars across the West, it can all be traced back to not saying “No!” to Jews.

Interview with Josh Neal on the new edition of The Culture of Critique, etc.

/9 Comments/in , /by

Dr. Kevin MacDonald, “Culture of Critique”

Celebrating the release of the third edition, by Antelope Hill Publishing
Psychopolitics
Sep 19, 2025

Support Dr. MacDonald:

Buy my books here:

Another Canadian Antisemite

/5 Comments/in , /by

As a small break from the tedium of the Charlie Kirk fiasco, here’s a little news item from Canada that didn’t quite make its way into the broader MSM.  On Monday September 15, CBC Radio broadcast a French-language television program Sur le Terrain (‘On the Ground’), hosted by Christian Latreille, that covered Marco Rubio’s latest visit to Israel.  Their correspondent in Washington was a female reporter, Elisa Serret, who has served as a national correspondent for the CBC for over 10 years.  By all accounts, she is an experienced and well-respected journalist.

At one point in the program, Latreille asked Serret why Americans “have such difficulty distancing themselves from Israel, even in the most difficult moments”—such as in the midst of an ongoing genocide.  She replied:

My understanding, and that of multiple analysts here in the United States, is that it is the Israelis, the Jews, that heavily finance American politics. There is a big machine behind them, making it very difficult for Americans to detach themselves from Israel’s positions.  It is really the money here in the United States. The big cities are run by Jews.  Hollywood is run by Jews.

Well.  What impudence: to speak some truth, live, to a national television audience.  Predictably, the Canadian Jewish Lobby jumped all over this incident.  The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) declared that “antisemitism is absolutely unacceptable” and called for “immediate and unequivocal condemnation from all relevant [Canadian] leaders.”  In an online statement, the group said that “Antisemitism is corroding the fabric of society”; they demanded that the CBC “take concrete steps to ensure that neither such comments—nor the systemic issues that enabled them to be aired—are ever allowed again on Canadian airwaves.” The B’nai Brith of Canada said it was “deeply irresponsible and dangerous,” calling her remarks “textbook antisemitic conspiracy theories.”  They demanded an on-air retraction stating that the comments were “false, hateful, and unacceptable.”

Also predictably, Canadian authorities immediately caved in to pressure.  Writing on X, Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault said “The words used last night were pernicious antisemitic tropes and have absolutely no place on Canadian airwaves.”  A few hours later, the CBC released a statement saying that Serret’s analysis “led to stereotypical, antisemitic, false, and harmful allegations against Jewish communities.”  Conservative deputy leader and Jewish lesbian Melissa Lantsman called for her to be fired.  Serret was, of course, promptly “relieved of her duties until further notice.”  The Canadian Jewish Lobby, it seems, has nearly as much power internally as the US Jewish Lobby has here.

We can understand the Lobby’s reaction—it definitely makes things look bad for the Jews.  “Antisemitic” (yes, thankfully), “harmful” (yes), “hurtful” (yes)…but “false”?  That is, was she wrong?  Did Serret speak some actual truth, or was it all just “trope”?  Let’s walk through each of her assertions.

First: “Israelis/Jews heavily finance American politics.”  This is undeniably true.  According to a 2020 report by Jewish researcher Gil Troy, American Jews provide a huge proportion of political donations: around 25% for Republicans and 50% or more for Democrats.  Indeed, the Democrats are particularly captive to Jewish money; other sources claim that their Jewish share runs “as much as 60%,” “over 60%,” up to 70% of “large contributions,” and perhaps as high as 80-90% for certain elections.[1]  Such figures are surely underestimates, given how much dark money and laundered donations make their way into politicians’ pockets.

But Republicans are obviously not free from such influence.  Trump received considerable funding from wealthy Jews, including the likes of Bernie Marcus (deceased), Miriam Adelson (Sheldon Adelson’s wife; Adelson is deceased), Carl Icahn, Paul Singer, Robert Kraft, Steve Witkoff, Howard Lutnik, Jacob Helberg, Bill Ackman, Ron Lauder, and Marc Rowan.  Most notably, in the latter phases of last year’s election, Miriam Adelson made good on her pledge of $100 million to Trump’s campaign.

Let there be no doubt:  Jews are the dominant donors in American politics for both parties, and this is a key factor underlying the subservient compliance of our elected officials.

Second: “a big machine.”  The US Jewish Lobby is indeed a big machine, centered on the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, or AIPAC.  AIPAC has its own political action committee (the “AIPAC PAC”) to make donations, and its own super-PAC, the United Democracy Project (UDP); jointly, these two components spent at least $125 million in the last election cycle.  AIPAC has minders or staff members in the offices of nearly every Congressman, and it works to defeat unfriendly legislators—most recently, Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman.  Other influential Jewish groups include the American Jewish Committee (AJC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), the Council of Presidents (COP), the Union for Reform Judaism (URJ), the Orthodox Union (OU), and the Jewish Agency for Israel (JAFI).  Other groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) receive considerable Jewish funding and thus work to serve Jewish interests.  Additionally, we have “liberal” Jewish organizations like Jewish Voices for Peace (JVP) and J-Street that work to advance Jewish aims.  A big machine indeed.

Third: “very difficult for Americans to detach.”  Most Americans, especially the young, are increasingly moving toward anti-Israel and even anti-Jewish views.  US approval for Israeli actions in Gaza recently hit a new low of 32%, down from 50% early in the conflict.  Only 9% of those 18-34 approve of the actions, showing a notable “detachment” among American youth.  A recent poll showed that 30% of Americans believe that “Jews have too much power.”  And perhaps most notoriously, a 2023 survey found that 20% of American youth believe that the Holocaust was “a myth.”  The American people, especially the youth, do not find it very hard to detach from the Israeli megalith.

American politicians, however, are another story.  Having been heavily funded, and even pre-selected, to be pro-Israel and pro-Jewish, Congressmen routinely vote 80%, 90%, even 100% in favor of Jewish interests.  Apart from a few renegades in the US House, like Thomas Massie and Rashida Tlaib, Congress is thoroughly unable to detach from Jewish interests.  The two major parties, who disagree on nearly every other point, readily find common ground when it comes to Jewish and Israeli concerns.

The only real “detachment” problem in the US today is the one from Jewish money in politics.  Excluding such money would be obvious in any rational governmental system.  Unfortunately today in the US, we are governed by an irrational system, one in which the process of change is corrupted and blocked by the same money that creates the problem in the first place.  In other words, wealthy Jews, who now effectively control Congress and the Executive branch, will naturally stop any efforts to reform the system in such a way that might decrease their power.  They control both the system and the means to change the system; this is political corruption beyond belief, and it suggests that only governmental collapse or civil war will improve things.

Fourth: “it is really the money.”  Yes, as noted above.  American Jews own or control as much as 50% of the $175 trillion in total personal wealth in this country.  They comprise half or more of the richest Americans, including the new #1, Larry Ellison, who recently clocked in at $390 billion[2] and is now buying up media.  If the 6 million or so Jewish-Americans own or control, say, $90 trillion, this yields a staggering average of $15 million in assets for every Jewish man, woman, and child.  The average Jewish family of four thus holds about $60 million in wealth.  Little wonder that they can afford such hefty political donations.

Fifth: “the big cities are run by Jews.”  Serret has overreached here a bit.  Of the 50 largest cities in the US, only three have Jewish mayors:  San Francisco (Daniel Lurie), Louisville (Craig Greenberg), and Minneapolis (Jacob Frey).  But several other large cities have significant Jewish populations and thus are certainly run in accord with their interests, including New York (10.8% Jewish, for the larger metropolitan area), Miami (8.7%), Philadelphia (6.8%), Boston (5.2%), Los Angeles (4.7%), Washington DC (4.7%), and Baltimore (4.1%).  (I would note that, based on empirical and anecdotal evidence, for any demographic unit in which Jews exceed even 1%, they certainly dominate political and economic activities.)  Additionally, there are a number of Jewish governors, and they clearly have influence over the major cities in their respective states: Jared Polis (Colorado); J. B. Pritzker (Illinois); Josh Green (Hawaii); Josh Shapiro (Pennsylvania); Josh Stein (North Carolina); and Matt Meyer (Delaware).  On the other hand, there are large cities with relatively few Jews, including Indianapolis, Memphis, and Austin.  Thus, it is something of a mixed bag, but Jewish interests unquestionably dominate in New York, LA, Miami, DC, Philly, San Francisco, and Boston.

Sixth:  “Hollywood is run by Jews.”  Nothing more need be said.  Actually, it would have been better if Serret had said, “American media is run by Jews”; we can infer that this is what she meant.  One need only look at the largest media conglomerates:  Disney/ABC, run by Bob Iger, Alan Horn, and Alan Braverman; Warner Discovery, run by David Zaslav; NBC/Universal, run by Mark Lazarus, Bonnie Hammer, and via Comcast, Brian Roberts; and Paramount, run by Shari Redstone.  Furthermore, the new Skydance/Paramount corporation will be run by billionaire Larry Ellison’s son, David, and his new management team includes Jeff Shell, Josh Greenstein, and Dana Goldberg.  Case closed.  This lock on American media, which includes news and entertainment, explains why most Americans are utterly unaware of the situational dominance by Jews.  Very little truth slips out; and when it does, as in this case, the censors and “editors” step in to squelch the story and contain the damage.

Elisa Serret is a heroine.  We owe her much gratitude for her few seconds of truth-telling on a national media stage.  For now, the Jews have black-bagged her, but we can only hope that she reemerges stronger than before—perhaps as a new media star in North America, perhaps as a new, strong voice in defense of truth, honesty, and justice.

David Skrbina, PhD, is a retired professor of philosophy. For more on his work and writings, see www.davidskrbina.com

[1] Cited in Washington Post (13 Mar 2003, p. A1); Jewish Power in America (2008) by R. Feingold, p. 4; The Hill (30 Mar 2004, p. 1); Passionate Attachment (1992) by Ball and Ball, p. 218—respectively.

[2] Ellison regularly swaps places with Elon Musk, depending on the vagaries of the stock market.  If one man owns nearly half a trillion dollars, we can easily see how 6 million Jews might own $80 or $90 trillion.

Kevin DeAnna on Arktos: The European Civil War Starts Again

/11 Comments/in , , /by

The European Civil War Starts Again

Kevin DeAnna pays tribute to Charlie Kirk, Iryna Zarutska, and Liana Kassai, arguing that their killings inaugurate a new age of martyrdom and struggle for the future of European peoples.

Historically, Western Civilization has existed as a unity. From the Greek alliance against the Persians, to Rome, to the Crusades, the West has found its highest expression when it fights as one. Since the rise of the nation-state, such expressions have been few. In many ways, the entire twentieth century was one great European Civil War, with the global right and left warring over the destiny of Western Man. The victor was not the Communists nor the traditional Right but the extra-European, American creed of individual liberation and international capitalism. In the eyes of critics like Julius Evola, this was a foreign conquest as dangerous as that of Soviet Communism.

Yet, while it is rational for Europeans to oppose American interference on the Continent, it does not change the reality. Despite repeated boasts of European “strategic autonomy” from figures like Emmanuel Macron, the EU has failed to chart a course separate from Washington, and in many ways seems more committed to center-left transatlantic institutions than America itself. The more traditionalist and arguably authentic European Right remains submerged and politically marginalized, while Donald Trump, despite his failures, provides a rallying point for Western patriots worldwide. We can mourn that America has become the Metropole of the West, but what happens in the United States affects everything that happens in Europe.

“The past European conflicts over borders, language, and empires fade to insignificance as we see the war raging within each of our countries.”

The killings of Iryna Zarutska, Liana Kassai, and Charlie Kirk could provide an unexpected spur to united action. The murder of Zarutska is almost overdone in its scripted poignancy – a beautiful Ukrainian refugee, practically a poster child for the sympathetic victim that the neoliberal establishment has been championing. She received shelter in America, exactly the kind of case that the liberal media would use as a club against the Trump Administration’s anti-immigration and arguably anti-Ukrainian policies. She got a job and begins making her way in the big city, almost a walking advertisement for progressives who want a living rebuttal to nativism, patriarchy, and Putinism.

All this was annihilated overnight as she was butchered before the uncaring denizens of Chicago by a career felon who was already arrested more than a dozen times. Decarlos Brown Jr. was released by a magistrate on the basis of a “written promise” he would show up for court, despite numerous past offenses and wild rantings to police that materials in his body were controlling his action. Despite his supposed insanity, he somehow managed to expertly ambush the one white girl within his car from behind, avoiding potentially more dangerous targets. Audio after the event suggests that he muttered “got that white girl” to himself as Zarutska bled out on the dirty floor, fodder for cell phone footage by gawking spectators. Needless to say, the murderer has already been referred to mental health counseling, and we await the inevitable ruling that he cannot be held criminally responsible.

The manner of Zarutska’s end also made her immortal. In shock from the sudden stabbing, she curls in a fetal position and looks up fearfully, almost childlike in appearance. As life drains from her, she sobs while the other passengers on the train ignore her. She then slides off the seat, dead within seconds. There is no gore or fountain of blood, but a combination of vulnerability and beauty that can’t help but inspire rage and a frustrated desire to protect her in every white man that viewed it. Her final moment is iconic, and it compels and yet sickens one to look upon it.

In her, we also see the countless other victims of terrorism and crime, mostly committed by non-whites throughout Europe. It’s impossible not to think of Liana Kassai, another Ukrainian refugee killed at a train station in August, this time in Germany. She was reportedly killed by an Iraqi refugee who had been denied asylum. German authorities initially suspected suicide, though the victim’s family immediately objected. In this case too, we are told the alleged murderer is schizophrenic. Despite his asylum request being denied, the alleged killer remained in the country for years.

Angela Merkel’s boast of “Wir schaffen das” appears doubly tragic, as the Fatherland’s inability to assimilate millions of resentful Muslims now compromises its ability to shelter its European kinsmen fleeing from war. The bright promises of European unity and even the German rearmament supposedly needed to guard the Continent against Russian aggression are especially hollow when refugees are in danger from non-European migrants admitted by Berlin itself. History is rebuking Mutti Merkel, with reality showing Europeans that no, we cannot do this, we cannot admit unlimited numbers of migrants from the Third World and remain who we are.

The assassination of Charlie Kirk is the capstone to this trifecta of tragedy. Kirk was a singular figure on the American Right. Only 31, no one in recent political history has filled so many roles. The founder and lead organizer of the most powerful campus conservative organization, he was also a talk show host, a political organizer who helped win the last presidential election, a close ally and advisor of the White House, a campus speaker, and an online fixture. No one else was simultaneously pushing the margins of political debate while remaining relevant within the mainstream, advocating realistic policies from within the corridors of power while simultaneously widening the Overton Window.

For the extremely online Dissident Right, Charlie Kirk and TPUSA were something of a joke years ago, famously confronted during the first “Groyper War” by activists pressuring him on immigration, anti-white discrimination, Israel, and other issues. Recently, however, Kirk had shifted his rhetoric away from Conservatism Inc. bromides. He proclaimed that there was undeniably a war on whites. He told whites to be proud of who they were. He called for ending the “H1B visa scam.” His final post on X read: “If we want things to change, it’s 100% necessary to politicize the senseless murder of Iryna Zarutska because it was politics that allowed a savage monster with 14 priors to be free on the streets to kill her.” The hard right did not appreciate Kirk until he was martyred, and many of us found to our shock that his opinions were not so different from ours after all.

Despite a deeply dishonest effort by media to muddy the waters, it appears the killer is exactly what most people expected: a progressive radicalized by the violent cults of “antifascism” and transgenderism. Though he was raised in a conservative family, it appears Tyler Robinson converted to the clichés of the modern egalitarian religion and felt he had not just the right but the duty to kill Kirk because he was a “hater.” Perhaps more than the killing itself, it is the reaction to the murder that has radicalized the Right. Soldiers, nurses, teachers, government workers, emergency dispatchers, and others in positions that Americans depend on in their most vulnerable moments have revealed themselves as reveling in the public execution of one of mainstream conservatism’s most beloved figures, one whose entire approach was characterized by a dedication to open debate with even his most militant opponents.

Yet what is most remarkable about the assassination of Kirk is how it has echoed around the world. In England, his name, along with that of Iryna and Liana, was cited by activists at the Unite the Kingdom rally. In Vienna and Leipzig, impromptu monuments to Iryna and Kirk were created, and then promptly targeted and destroyed by antifa. In Poland, Dariusz Matecki held up a picture of Iryna on the floor of the Sejm while proclaiming “White Lives Matter.” The names of our martyrs are known throughout the West.

“This struggle is forging a new civilizational identity, if for no other reason than that we face the same enemy pursuing the same goal of the Great Replacement.”

The past European conflicts over borders, language, and empires fade to insignificance as we see the war raging within each of our countries. While whites cling to post-racial illusions, non-whites within our countries put race first in both political and personal disputes. Unlike in the last European Civil War, leftists do not fight in the name of class justice, but in solidarity with non-whites to defeat “hate” and “racism.” Whatever local issues confront us, the essentials of mass immigration, crime, anti-white discrimination, and the repression of right-wing figures are common to Europeans worldwide. This struggle is forging a new civilizational identity, if for no other reason than that we face the same enemy pursuing the same goal of the Great Replacement.

Few of those on the authentic Right can have any illusions that American-style “conservatism” offers a way out of the death spiral of the West. Yet that is secondary. What matters is the forging of a constituency and ultimately a people that is aware it is under deadly, existential threat. The assassination of Kirk and the butchery of Iryna and Liana have brought that home to millions. “Our fellow citizens” mean nothing compared to those of kindred blood who have felt the pain of these losses and rallied against them. The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church – and the Faith is Europe, and Europe is the Faith.

Kevin DeAnna, popularly known under the pen name James Kirkpatrick, is the author of Conservatism Inc., available from Arktos.

THE CHARLOTTESVILLE LEGAL STRUGGLE CONTINUES!

/1 Comment/in , , /by

As many of you are aware, I have been in bankruptcy court fighting the multi-million dollar debt incurred from the absurd Sines v. Kessler ruling. While I will continue to call bullshit on the conspiracy allegations to the day I die, for legal purposes the arguments in bankruptcy court are of a different nature. Currently, the plaintiffs have been claiming that the debt incurred is not dischargeable, despite a clause in the law itself specifically stating that those found liable on a conspiracy allegation can discharge their debt so long as they themselves did not cause the actual damages.

The bankruptcy exception under 11 U.S. Code 523(6) states:

A discharge under… this title does not discharge an individual debtor for any debt for willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity.

The critical language is “for… injury by the debtor”

The so-called “injuries” in the Sines v Kessler case were all alleged to have been caused by the actions of other individuals. Not myself. In fact, I was not even present when a single one of these injuries occurred!

Despite my attorney pointing this out in his argument, Judge Ronald Sargis ignored the law and sided with the plaintiffs bizarre argument which conflates two legal concepts from entirely different jurisdictions and areas of law.

He observed that, in Virginia civil suits, an individual or business entity can, in some cases, be legally liable for the actions of another person via respondent superior (aka vicarious liability). An example of this is if an employee of a company negligently or wantonly injures a customer, the customer can sue the company itself, and it is legally responsible.

Then he applied that logic to federal bankruptcy law (which is an entirely independent area of law) and concluded that, because VA civil liability acknowledges vicarious liability, then the federal exception statute for bankruptcy (which states that “the debtor” must physically harm someone or some property) should also be subject to vicarious liability.

This is an entirely malicious interpretation of the law based on a genocidal hatred of of White people. This ruling is ultimately not about me. It is about sending a message that any White man who publicly rejects the ethnic cleansing of our people will be dragged through the system for years on end.

Despite this, I have not given up hope. Legally, the ruling is so absurd that there is a good chance a higher court will overturn it or risk setting an entirely new precedent that would overthrow long-standing bankruptcy law. While I have already filed a notice of appeal, the process will require raising another $3,000 for the fees involved that I cannot afford. If you would like to contribute to my my legal fight against this judicial corruption, click on the link below to the Free Expression Foundation (FEF) and make a donation. Please ensure to write in the notes that the donation is to go to my appeal, as I am not the only individual being represented by the FEF.

DONATE

As always, anything donated to the Free Expression Foundation that is not needed for my case will go to the defense of others. Thank you for your support. I could not continue without all of you.

Revisiting The Culture of Critique: Kevin MacDonald on Jewish influence and the future of the West.

/3 Comments/in /by

El Niño Speaks 178: Revisiting The Culture of Critique

Kevin MacDonald on Jewish influence and the future of the West.

In this episode of El Niño Speaks, José Niño sat down with Dr. Kevin MacDonald, evolutionary psychologist and author of The Culture of Critique, for an in-depth conversation on one of the most controversial and enduring analyses of Jewish influence in modern history.

We discuss the origins of his thesis, how Jewish-led intellectual and political movements reshaped Western societies in the twentieth century, the updates in the new third edition, and why The Culture of Critique remains more relevant than ever in today’s polarized political climate.

Follow Dr. MacDonald’s work:

Substack: kmacd33.substack.com
Twitter: @RealKevinMacD33
Website: The Occidental Observer

Israeli Cybersecurity Official’s Case Exposes Israel’s Reputation as a Haven for Sex Offenders

/4 Comments/in /by

When Tom Artiom Alexandrovich, a top Israeli cybersecurity official, was arrested last month in Las Vegas for allegedly attempting to have sex with an undercover officer posing as a minor, few anticipated the diplomatic and political firestorm his swift release would ignite.

Alexandrovich, the Executive Director for Defense at Israel’s National Cyber Directorate, was initially arrested in Las Vegas after an undercover operation ensnared him with evidence of cyber-luring a supposed 15-year-old for sex, a felony carrying up to 10 years in prison. He was one of eight men caught in a joint task force sting carried out by the FBI and Nevada authorities, involving explicit chats on apps such as WhatsApp and Pure and arrangements to meet in person. The arrest report chillingly details that Alexandrovich brought a condom and planned to take the teenage decoy to a Cirque du Soleil show.

Upon his detention on August 6, 2025, Alexandrovich seemed “shocked” and quickly asked police about the status of his booked international flight home—stressing his family situation in Israel and only worrying about travel logistics, not the charges. He waived his Miranda rights and stated he believed the person was 18, despite the evidence proving otherwise.

Despite the severity of the crime, Alexandrovich was released on only $10,000 bail, given no monitoring or passport seizure, and allowed to leave the country within two days—prior to his initial court date. Other defendants in the same sting remained jailed, faced higher bail, or wore electronic monitors. Criminal defense experts described the release highly irregular and suspicious, noting it broke standard protocol for flight risks in serious felony cases.

Alexandrovich missed his court date on August 27, after his lawyers attempted to claim a back-room deal exempted him from appearing. Judge Barbara Schifalacqua swiftly denied this claim, further highlighting the exceptional treatment he received. The federal government, under President Donald Trump, immediately denied any intervention in Alexandrovich’s release. In an August 19 statement, the State Department insisted, “Any claims that the US government intervened are false,” declaring Alexandrovich did not invoke diplomatic immunity and that his release was a state—not federal—judicial decision.

However, Acting U.S. Attorney Sigal Chattah, an Israeli-born Trump appointee for the District of Nevada, decided not to pursue federal charges, a key decision that prevented leveraging stronger extradition tools. On August 18, Chattah publicly criticized state officials for failing to seize Alexandrovich’s passport and demanded his return. Chattah clarified that “the Clark County District Attorney’s office — not federal authorities — is handling the prosecution” of the Israeli officials.

Moments later, she took to social media, blasting local authorities: “A liberal district attorney and state court judge in Nevada FAILED TO REQUIRE AN ALLEGED CHILD MOLESTER TO SURRENDER HIS PASSPORT, which allowed him to flee our country.”

Chattah also asserted that Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel are “outraged” by the incident. Under heavy fire for her silence on the Alexandrovich case, Chattah bowed to pressure and deleted her personal social media accounts amid the backlash.

This case produced a notable rift in the MAGA movement, long considered fervently pro-Israel. Prominent Republicans and digital influencers aligned with President Donald Trump expressed fury at the double standard and perceived subservience to Israel. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) sounded off on X, “How did America become so subservient to Israel that we immediately release a CHILD SEX PREDATOR after arrest, with a 100% locked up case with evidence, and let him off to fly back home to Israel?? Would we do that with a Mexican child sex predator?”

Other MAGA figures also piled on. Former Navy intelligence officer and MAGA influencer Jack Posobiec stated, “DOJ should file federal charges and demand immediate extradition,” while popular conservative personality Tucker Carlson questioned, “What is going on here? Why would the United States allow a foreign government official charged with a child sex crime to avoid prosecution?” Candace Owens, a conservative influencer who has taken a surprising anti-Israel turn since October 7, 2023,  attributed Alexandrovich’s release to Chattah’s Israeli heritage. “The US attorney general who released him is Israeli-born Sigal Chattah. Makes sense now!,” Owens remarked.

The state of Israel initially appeared to deny the gravity of the arrest. A spokesperson for Prime Minister Netanyahu claimed Alexandrovich “was questioned by American authorities during his visit” and “returned to Israel as planned,” omitting any mention of official criminal charges. The National Cyber Directorate only admitted Alexandrovich was placed on leave pending further developments.

This scandal must be understood against the backdrop of Israel’s reputation as a haven for sex offenders and traffickers. Over the past two decades, Israel’s standing in the U.S. State Department’s annual Trafficking in Persons Reports has fluctuated dramatically. In 2001, Israel was ranked the lowest possible (Tier 3), deemed by the U.S. government as “a destination country for trafficked persons, primarily women.”

While the Jewish state’s standing was later upgraded, in 2021 the country was downgraded to Tier 2 amidst criticisms that Israel made “woefully inadequate efforts to prevent human trafficking” and that key populations, including children, remained extremely vulnerable.

A persistent feature driving headlines has been Israel’s Law of Return, which allows Jews worldwide to acquire instant citizenship regardless of their criminal background.  On paper, an amendment added to the law in 1954 prohibits “a person with a criminal past, likely to endanger public welfare,” yet campaigners argue that sex offenders continue to slip through.

Israel is becoming a safe haven for paedophiles due to the unique opportunity available to all Jews from anywhere in the world to immigrate there,” explained Manny Waks, a child abuse survivor and founder of the advocacy group Kol V’Oz, in remarks to The Independent.

This provides a relatively efficient and effective way to evade justice from other countries. It also provides a sanctuary to those who have already been convicted.

It’s important to note that while there are some criminal background checks as part of the immigration process, there are multiple ways to overcome this requirement.”

Shana Aaronson, director of Magen, an organization which works on cases of sexual abuse in Israel’s Orthodox Jewish community, also had choice words about the Jewish state’s lax policies toward sex offenders. “I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say that Israel is a safe haven for Jewish sexual offenders,” Aaronson stated. She emphasized that many have found protection through Orthodox networks and legal loopholes.

Thanks to this permissive environment, as many as 100 accused or convicted pedophiles—including notorious figures like Malka Leifer, Jimmy Julius Karow, and Mordechai Yomtov—have sought refuge in Israel over the past two decades. Each of these cases is deeply disturbing.

Jimmy Julius Karow

In 2000, Jimmy Julius Karow was accused of sexually assaulting a 9-year-old girl in Oregon. Before U.S. authorities could apprehend him, Karow fled to Israel. Once there, he took advantage of Israel’s Law of Return to gain citizenship, adopting the name Yosef Chaim Karow to establish his new identity.

Karow did not escape legal trouble entirely. In 2002, he was convicted in Israel on separate sexual assault charges and served a five-year prison sentence. Years later, in 2017, he faced further accusations involving two young Israeli sisters, ages 3 and 7, whom he allegedly raped and sexually assaulted between 1999 and 2001. The charges included rape, sodomy, and indecent assault.

In 2021, Karow signed a plea agreement where he will spend over a decade in prison. Despite his conviction in Israel, it remains unlikely that he will ever be extradited to face the original charges in the United States. Meanwhile, an active Interpol Red Notice continues to list him as a fugitive wanted by U.S. authorities.

Malka Leifer

Malka Leifer served as principal of the Adass Israel School, an ultra-Orthodox girls’ school in Melbourne, Australia, from 2001 to 2008. During that time, she faced allegations of sexually abusing multiple students. Ultimately, she was charged with 74 counts of child sexual abuse and convicted on 18 counts, including rape and sexual assault, primarily involving two sisters, Dassi Erlich and Elly Sapper, between 2003 and 2007.

When the allegations first surfaced in 2008, Leifer fled to Israel. What followed was a prolonged 13-year legal battle, with more than 70 court hearings as she fought extradition. She initially avoided being sent back to Australia by claiming mental illness, but in 2020 Israeli psychiatrists concluded that she had been faking her condition to escape justice. Surprisingly, Leifer would face justice in Australia after being extradited there in January 2021. In August 2023, she was sentenced to 15 years in prison, with eligibility for parole beginning in June 2029.

Mordechai Yomtov

Mordechai Yomtov worked as a Hebrew teacher at Cheder Menachem, an all-boys Orthodox yeshiva in Hollywood that served 185 students. In December 2001, he was arrested on 10 felony counts of committing lewd acts with three boys, ages 8 to 10.

Two months later, in February 2002, Yomtov reached a plea agreement. He pleaded guilty to two counts of continuous sexual abuse and one count of lewd conduct. He was sentenced to one year in county jail and five years of probation. However, Yomtov violated the terms of his probation when he fled the United States. Using a fake passport, he traveled through Mexico before making his way to Israel, where he continues to reside illegally.

When confronted by investigators, Yomtov admitted to violating his probation and offered a general apology to his victims. Yet his escape denied his victims the justice they sought. For at least one former student, Mendy Hauck, the trauma lingered for years. Hauck only came forward in 2016 after being encouraged by another victim who had spoken out.

*   *   *

The Alexandrovich affair is not an isolated scandal but a microcosm of the deeper, abusive relationship between the United States and Israel. Time and again, Israeli officials and fugitives exploit America’s indulgence, slipping past basic standards of law and morality that most of the world still respects. Israel’s outsized influence over Washington ensures that even the most egregious violations, including crimes against children, are shielded from real accountability.

Meanwhile, Israel’s status as a refuge for sex offenders continues to mock U.S. sovereignty, exposing the hollowness of its justice system. Until America breaks free from this humiliating dynamic, cases like Alexandrovich’s will not only persist but proliferate, serving as recurring reminders of the degradation inflicted on a superpower by its supposed “ally.”