• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

General

Peter Brimelow and the “Zionist Gatekeepers Ball”

August 9, 2025/2 Comments/in General/by Peter Brimelow

‘Hazony’s racist/ racialist “border” to the “National Conservativism” that he proposes for Americans is completely hypocritical. Israel is an ethnostate. Why should the U.S. not be a white ethnostate, as it was implicitly until the 1965 Immigration Act?

“It’s hard to avoid the conclusion that Hazony’s National Conservative operation is an extreme Zionist Gatekeepers Ball, as the late lamented ZMAN described its first conference. (Significantly, he was thereafter banned”

https://www.peterbrimelow.com/p/hazony-decrees-vdare-beyond-the-pale

Hazony Decrees: “VDARE Beyond The Pale.” But Why?

Do These People Know What They’re Doing?

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Peter Brimelow https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Peter Brimelow2025-08-09 08:40:442025-08-09 10:41:25Peter Brimelow and the “Zionist Gatekeepers Ball”

“Israel Hides MASSIVE IDF Casualties and Losses in Gaza,” Say Former IDF Generals

August 8, 2025/2 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Surprising if true.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-08-08 12:23:012025-08-08 12:23:01“Israel Hides MASSIVE IDF Casualties and Losses in Gaza,” Say Former IDF Generals

Israeli dual citizen Hazony trying to convince White people to oppose White racialismn

August 8, 2025/in General/by Patrick Cleburne

“Israeli dual-citizen and civic nationalist Yoram Hazony stated that the National Conservatism platform opposes White racialism, citing VDARE as an example of the kind of racialist thinking his movement rejects.”

Peter Brimelow X account @PeterBrimelow
“Hazony wants to deny the American nation’s ethnic core but won’t mention Israel’s (Right of Return, Judaism’s matrilineality etc.) Can he really get away with this? More later”
Patrick Cleburne. Ignore extraneous frame of Stephen Miller. Hazony’s anti-Vdare diatribe begins at 1:00. Ends “We are not interested in a nationalism of blood”

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/427316dfb46a67ecda14f5b75153a1ed.mp4
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Patrick Cleburne https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Patrick Cleburne2025-08-08 10:25:402025-08-08 10:25:40Israeli dual citizen Hazony trying to convince White people to oppose White racialismn

The NYT’s Idea of a Conservative Is a Blithering Idiot

August 8, 2025/3 Comments/in General/by Ann Coulter

The NYT’s Idea of a Conservative Is a Blithering Idiot

Who could have guessed that The New York Times’ “conservative” columnist would be a pompous idiot, except anyone who’s ever seen the in-house conservatives at ABC, NBC, CBS, The Washington Post, etc., etc.

I was tricked into reading a column by “conservative” Ross Douthat by its title, “Conspiracies Are Real. The Theories Can Be Traps.” It’s a point I’ve often made myself. Of course, there are conspiracies. Political parties are conspiracies, businesses are conspiracies, sports teams are conspiracies.

Ross Douthat

Other than noncontroversial conspiracies, like political parties, business enterprises and the fact that Big Tech was censoring conservatives like mad from 2020 until Elon bought Twitter, the silly conspiracy theories involve vastly complicated, man-behind-the-curtain, super-secret operations — like UFOs manipulating humankind, Obama being the mastermind of everything the Democrats do, “they” (the media? the FBI?) orchestrating the assassination attempt on Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, and of course, the Jews.

So yeah, there are loads of real conspiracies, it’s the wacko theories that take things off the rails.

But that’s not Douthat’s point. His point mainly seems to be to remind me why I don’t read him.

He strikes the classic pose of the “reasonable” conservative. While he may not agree with Times readers, he sure doesn’t agree with those right-wing kooks, either! Everybody’s wrong — but he will explain what’s really going on from his perch on Mount Common Sense Olympus.

Except what Douthat calls right-wing “conspiracy theories” are classically known as “facts.” And what he posits as the Reasonable Middle positions are completely nuts.

He says the right-wing conspiracy theory on Jeffrey Epstein is this: “MAGA activists and influencers have long focused on the possibility that he ran a sex ring for wealthy men.” Nonsense, he says, driven by “ideological impulses.”

Ross, darling, I don’t know where you’ve been, but that is the irreducible minimum of what Epstein was doing. Anyone who cared to know the truth has known it since 2006, when the Palm Beach police released the results of their investigation.

Since then, we’ve gotten truckloads of court rulings and sworn affidavits, confirming what Douthat calls a “conspiracy theory.” Here’s a tiny scintilla of the evidence for the crazy idea that Epstein was running a sex ring for wealthy men:

— In February 2019, after a full briefing with supporting affidavits, Federal District Court Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that Epstein “and all of his powerful friends” committed “hundreds of federal sex trafficking crimes” in Florida. “In addition to his own sexual abuse of the victims,” the court found that “Epstein directed other persons to abuse the girls sexually.”

— A legal complaint on behalf of Virginia Giuffre, probably the single-most credible witness against Epstein, stated that she “was regularly abused by Epstein and was lent out by Epstein to others for sexual purposes.”

— Among Epstein’s “powerful friends” was Prince Andrew. Douthat may have his doubts, but the royal family sure doesn’t. Deeming Andrew’s response to the pedophilia accusations somewhat wanting, the erstwhile prince was stripped of his royal title, his security detail and all government funding.

— Another Epstein pal was French modeling agent Jean Luc Brunel. In December 2020, Paris Prosecutor Remy Heitz charged Brunel with committing — I quote — “rape, sexual assault and sexual harassment on various minor or major victims and of having in particular organized the transport and accommodation of young girls or young women on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein.” Before he could be tried, Brunel was found dead in Paris prison cell, an apparent suicide.

What Douthat describes as “the possibility that [Epstein] ran a sex ring for wealthy men,” is a solid certitude. It’s the only thing we know for a fact about his operation.

But, unfettered by ideological blinders, Douthat, this noble standard-bearer of the truth, says the real explanation of what Epstein was doing, was most likely the following:

“Suppose, though, that the crucial secret is that Epstein was a brilliant financial criminal, adept at moving money for shady international operators, and that his sexual habits were tolerated because of those talents, not because he had sexual kompromat.”

Oh yeah, that’s totally believable. Except to anyone who knows anything about financial markets.

“Shady operators” have two basic moves: 1) making money at someone else’s expense, through deceit or fraud; and 2) money laundering, or “moving money.”

The first one we would know by now. Financial crimes always unravel, usually pretty quickly. Every single detail of Bernie Madoff’s operation, for example, was known at least a decade before the “investors” (marks) figured it out. By now, it’s been 20 years since people started asking questions about Epstein’s money.

Douthat’s second idea is even more absurd. Does he know what it means to “move money”? You “move” money — launder it — by taking criminal proceeds and putting it into something legit. Wherever Epstein’s money was coming from, it all ended up in his pocket — paying for his mansions, his private planes, his artwork, his private islands, his 14-year-old girls, his Harvard professors, and hisMicrosoft founders, etc. That’s not “laundering,” it’s “pocketing.”

Douthat’s purported dismantling of the right-wing “conspiracy theory” on Russiagate follows the same pattern: Poo-poo the blazing truth and push the insane.

Apparently, Douthat thinks it’s NUTS to imagine that CIA Director John Brennan (admitted liar about the CIA’s hacking of Senate staffers’ computers), National Intelligence Director James Clapper (provably perjured himself about the NIA illegally collecting data on millions of Americans) and FBI Director James Comey (posts pro-Trump assassination images on Instagram), would twist the intelligence to make Trump look bad. Where’d you wacko conspiracy theorists get that?

Instead, Douthat’s theory is that the real culprit was the all-knowing, highly skilled, Russian superspy operation that deployed its magic to swing an American presidential election by taking out as much as $200,000 in Facebook ads!!!!

Just when you think Douthat’s column can’t get any stupider, he comes up with something even stupider: His belief in UFOs.

And you wonder why Times readers think conservatives are simpletons.

COPYRIGHT 2025 ANN COULTER

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Ann Coulter https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Ann Coulter2025-08-08 05:40:252025-08-08 05:40:25The NYT’s Idea of a Conservative Is a Blithering Idiot

AfD and the Western Illusion of Democratic Integrity

August 7, 2025/5 Comments/in General/by Constantin von Hoffmeister

AfD and the Western Illusion of Democratic Integrity

Joachim Paul, the AfD candidate for mayor of Ludwigshafen, was recently barred from running in the upcoming election. The official reason: doubts about his “loyalty to the constitution.” The true reason: his political views challenge the liberal consensus that governs Germany today. Without any criminal conviction, and based only on a dossier compiled by domestic intelligence, he was declared politically illegitimate. There was no trial, no public debate, no transparent appeal. A committee, dominated by mainstream parties, simply forced him out. In modern Germany, this is called democracy.

Ten years earlier, in Moscow, a different scene unfolded. Alexei Navalny, a prominent critic of the Kremlin, was allowed to register as a mayoral candidate. Shortly after, he was convicted of embezzlement in a case widely seen as politically motivated. Even so, the Russian authorities released him on bail and permitted him to continue campaigning. Western media and governments decried the charges as unjust, and Navalny was elevated to the status of democratic martyr. His case was cited endlessly as proof of Russia’s authoritarianism.

Here lies the double standard.

In Germany, a man is blocked from running for office because of his ideas. In Russia, a man runs for office despite a criminal conviction. Yet the Western press calls the former a democracy and the latter a dictatorship. The key difference is ideological alignment. Navalny promoted a vision of Russia closer to the liberal West. Paul defends a vision of Germany that breaks with that same liberal order. The West protects those who serve its interests, even when they are guilty. It silences those who oppose them, even when they are innocent.

What is the meaning of democracy if candidates can be excluded not for crimes but for holding the wrong opinions? What is freedom if loyalty to a specific worldview becomes a legal requirement for public office? The answer is simple: it is no longer democracy but managed pluralism. The illusion of choice, curated from above.

In such a system, the rules are clear: dissent is allowed only if it is harmless. Opposition is permitted only when it reinforces the ruling ideology. And those who truly challenge the system are disqualified. The West’s democracy is not a system of open choice. It is a controlled theater, where only approved actors are allowed on stage. Beneath its polished words and shining slogans lies a cold machinery of exclusion, deceit, and ideological warfare. It does not fear tyranny. It has become it.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Constantin von Hoffmeister https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Constantin von Hoffmeister2025-08-07 13:02:452025-08-07 13:02:45AfD and the Western Illusion of Democratic Integrity

Huge peaceful protests in UK over migration

August 5, 2025/10 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Matt Goodwin: Labour is pushing the UK into civil unrest: Four astonishing things in one weekend

It’s not “the far right” that’s transforming the UK into a place where public protests and civil unrest are quickly becoming a regular feature of our national life; it is the establishment’s complete and utter failure to fulfil the very first duty of the state –to control its own borders, defend itself from invasions, and put its own people first.

It is hard, for example, to call a gathering of mainly women and girls wearing pink and performing a cheerful conga outside a hotel for asylum-seekers “right-wing extremism”….

Our hapless leaders are now importing tens of thousands of people from medieval societies and deeply misogynistic cultures that have been shown, through freedom of information requests submitted to UK police authorities, to produce people who are twenty timesmore likely than British nationals to commit rape and sexual assault. It’s not fashionable to point this out but then some facts are not fashionable.

https://www.mattgoodwin.org/p/labour-is-pushing-the-uk-into-civil

Keir Starmer and the Labour government are pushing the United Kingdom into a dark and dangerous place, a place where the social contract between the people and the politicians who are supposed to represent them is rapidly breaking down.

That’s the conclusion you’d reach were you to look at four things that happened over the weekend, all of which symbolise how volatile and febrile things are becoming.

First, though you won’t have heard much about it in legacy media, largely peaceful public protests against the country’s broken borders and Labour’s extreme policy of importing unvetted migrants into the heart of Britain’s communities have continued to spread across the country.

After starting in Epping, Essex, where an illegal migrant who arrived on the small boats “allegedly” sexually assaulted a 14-year-old schoolgirl, in recent days these protests spread to London, Manchester, Newcastle, Cannock, Portsmouth, Southampton, and Waterlooville, in Hampshire.

While those in power would like you to believe the protests reflect organised “far-right extremism”, and “misinformation” among an ignorant public, the reality of what is now unfolding is far more troubling for the elite class and the state.

On the whole, the protests have been organic and spontaneous, emerging among the people from the bottom-up, not orchestrated top-down by hardened extremists.

While certain newspapers are working overtime to try and portray the unrest as the work of “the far-right”, which in the UK remains fringe and amateurish, anybody who has actually been on the ground will immediately observe a very different reality.

It is hard, for example, to call a gathering of mainly women and girls wearing pink and performing a cheerful conga outside a hotel for asylum-seekers “right-wing extremism”.

Furthermore, as even the Financial Times was forced to note, this weekend, far from confined to white working-class estates that are routinely demonised by a London-based media, the protests now encompass “some of the most exclusive postcodes in the capital city”.

They are attracting mothers, fathers, grandparents and other concerned citizens, all of whom, in a country once famous for avoiding civil unrest, now feel they have no other option but to take to the streets to vent their entirely legitimate anger.

And what’s stoking this righteous anger? It is the Labour Party’s —and before them the Tory party’s— deliberate choice to allow open borders in this country, to think it is somehow acceptable to house illegal migrants in hotels and houses, in the heart of Britain’s communities, next to families and children, to then force the British people to pay £5.5 million every day for a policy they never voted for, and to even allow private firms like Serco to use the British people’s own money to rig the housing market so that landlords prioritise illegal migrants over tax-paying citizens.

So, let’s be clear.

It’s not “the far right” that’s transforming the UK into a place where public protests and civil unrest are quickly becoming a regular feature of our national life; it is the establishment’s complete and utter failure to fulfil the very first duty of the state –to control its own borders, defend itself from invasions, and put its own people first.

And then, secondly, this weekend also brought another truly shocking discovery that underlines exactly why so many people are now protesting in the streets.

On Saturday evening, the country learned that a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton, Warwickshire —a 12-year-old girl—was “allegedly” kidnapped and raped by two asylum-seekers, named Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir, staying in these taxpayer-funded homes.

Charged with kidnap, strangulation, and aiding and abetting the rape of a girl under 13 years of age, the two migrants, reportedly from Afghanistan, are merely the latest, sickening example of what the elite class would rather we not talk about.

How our hapless leaders are now importing tens of thousands of people from medieval societies and deeply misogynistic cultures that have been shown, through freedom of information requests submitted to UK police authorities, to produce people who are twenty times more likely than British nationals to commit rape and sexual assault. It’s not fashionable to point this out but then some facts are not fashionable.

And as if all that wasn’t enough, we then discovered, thirdly, something else which clearly shows how people in the corridors of power have still learned nothing at all from the equally hideous rape gang scandal, which is still rocking the country.

Shockingly, we not only learned about the rape of a child but that Warwickshire police, who oversaw the case, actually advised local politicians and officials not to reveal the fact that the alleged rapists and paedophiles were asylum-seekers for fear of, you guessed it, “inflaming community tensions”.

Taxpayer-funded authorities, in other words, are now more concerned about managing the possible reaction among the British majority than the horrifying fact that children are being raped by people who are being imported into our communities by our own government.

Was this not the exact same mindset, the exact same logic, that led to the decades-long cover-up of the rape gang scandal to begin with? A decision among out-of-touch and ideologically-motivated elites to prioritise “community relations” and the survival of the state-backed policy of multiculturalism over the need to tell people the truth about what is happening in their own communities and country?

What, exactly, is the logic here —just keep trying to cover stuff up, from the rape of our children to the state importing tens of thousands of Afghans, including members of the Taliban, in the hope nobody notices?

And have state officials learned nothing at all since not only the rape gang scandal but also Southport, when one politician after another similarly tried to suppress the truth from a people who can easily spot the truth from miles away?

Clearly not given the final thing we learned about this weekend, which is that rather than deal with what is actually causing all the chaos, carnage and civil unrest, rather than controlling our borders, our hapless Labour politicians, like those officials in Warwickshire, are far more interested in controlling our speech.

That’s right. Ever since Southport, we’ve had the pathetic sight of Keir Starmer and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper doing what the left does best when it is losing an argument —trying to shut down free speech and free expression, impose a stifling regime of censorship, and control the supply of information.

Have you ever noticed how the very first thing to go in a leftist political religion that is now fully organised around ‘diversity’ is diversity of thought? This is because it is the thing the left cannot control.

Which is why, ever since Southport, we’ve seen the expansion of ‘non-crime hate incidents’. We’ve seen plans to impose a new, dodgy definition of ‘Islamophobia’. We’ve seen the arrival of the draconian Online Safety Act. We’ve seen Labour activists rushing off to America with plans to ‘kill’ Elon Musk’s X platform.

And now, this weekend, we discovered that the Labour government and the state are continuing to invest in a ‘disinformation unit’, using the very same tools that were created to fight ISIS online to now try and fight people who are critical of open borders, the ‘asylum hotels’, two-tier policing, and Labour’s policy of mass uncontrolled immigration.

According to documents seen by The Telegraph, the secretive unit, called the National Security and Online Information Team (NSOIT), is flagging “concerning” narratives about immigration and two-tier policing to big tech platforms, even prompting officials in the Trump White House, understandably, to say they are “greatly concerned” about these blatant efforts to restrict free speech.

As we all should be. Because today, worryingly, many of us are now living in a country in which our democratically elected leaders somehow think it is appropriate and acceptable to use the same tools that were used to try and prevent Muslims from “radicalising” online, from travelling to fight with Jihadists in Syria, and from carrying out Islamist terrorist attacks, to try and control and contain people who are critical of mass migration and having to live with open borders.

Sorry but no. No. No. No.

While Labour and the elite class appear to have forgotten this fact, let me remind them that we live in a democracy, in a free society, in the original home of individual liberty, where each and every one of us has the right to publicly criticise whatever policy we might want to criticise —especially policies that nobody in this country ever voted for, or asked for.

Nobody in Britain asked to live with open borders. Nobody ever voted for mass uncontrolled immigration. Nobody asked for schoolgirls and children to be raped and sexually assaulted by medieval men who should never have been in this country to begin with. And nobody asked for their elected leaders, for the very people who are supposed to represent them and keep them safe, to prioritise controlling their speech and opinions over the far more urgent need to control their borders and country.

Yet what is now crystal clear after this weekend is that it’s exactly posts and writing like this that are now being closely watched and monitored by the state.

And I have no doubt whatsoever that somewhere in Whitehall and Westminster somebody is putting a black mark next to my name, alongside thousands of others.

So let me just end by saying this.

It is precisely because of the truly dire state of our country, as symbolised by the deeply troubling events this weekend, that, like many of you, I will never, ever, ever stop calling out the chaos and incompetence that is now flowing out of Number 10 Downing Street, which is not only putting our people and our children at risk but is now pushing our country into civil unrest.

I will never stop explaining how and why we need to urgently and dramatically change course and nor should you —because, as I say, while our leaders might have forgotten it I still remember what lies in the beating heart of this nation.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-08-05 07:25:312025-08-05 07:25:31Huge peaceful protests in UK over migration

Politico: Zionist money against Thomas Massie: Paul Singer, Miriam Adelson, and John Paulson

August 4, 2025/3 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald
These donations are not about Massie’s opposition to the Big Beautiful Bill (one wonders if that’s Trump’s real motivation), but his well-known criticisms of the Israel Lobby.

Donors to Trump allies’ anti-Massie super PAC revealed

The Trump-tied super PAC raised $2 million.

GOP megadonor Paul Singer was the largest donor to a super PAC seeking to oust Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) last month, according to a filing submitted to the Federal Election Commission on Thursday.

The group, MAGA KY, raised $2 million between its launch in late June and the end of the month:

  • $1 million from Singer
  • $250,000 from hedge fund manager John Paulson
  • $750,000 from Preserve America PAC, a super PAC tied to Miriam Adelson that backed President Donald Trump last year

Trump allies launched the super PAC last month after Massie voted against Trump’s signature “Big, Beautiful Bill.” The Kentucky lawmaker has also criticized the president on a range of other issues including war powers and the Epstein files. MAGA KY has spent $1.2 million so far on ads opposing Massie, according to AdImpact, as the group aims to take him out in next year’s primary.

Massie, who has staved off primary challengers before, has raised just over $1 million this year, and he ended June with $1.7 million in the bank. It is not yet clear which Republican might be favored by Trump to challenge him.
Miriam Adelson and Paul  Singer are well known pro-Israel fanatics, but in case you are unclear about Paulson, he has a Jewish mother and is well known to be a strong   supporter of Israel:
Wikipedia: In 2024, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem awarded Paulson an honorary doctorate in recognition of his extensive philanthropic contributions to Israeli cultural and educational institutions. His support for Israeli initiatives includes a $27 million commitment to establish the Paulson Bar-El Building for Computer Science and Engineering at Hebrew University. Paulson also contributed significantly to the Tel Aviv Museum of Art in 2021 to celebrate the museum’s 90th anniversary and has supported the Jerusalem Campus for the Arts.
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-08-04 09:31:282025-08-04 09:31:28Politico: Zionist money against Thomas Massie: Paul Singer, Miriam Adelson, and John Paulson
Page 13 of 184«‹1112131415›»
Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Keep Up To Date By Email

Subscribe to get our latest posts in your inbox twice a week.

Name

Email


Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

  • A2Z Publications
  • American Freedom Party
  • American Mercury
  • American Renaissance
  • Arktos Publishing
  • Candour Magazine
  • Center for Immigration Studies
  • Chronicles
  • Council of European Canadians
  • Counter-Currents
  • Curiales—Dutch nationalist-conservative website
  • Denmark's Freedom Council
  • Diversity Chronicle
  • Folktrove: Digital Library of the Third Way
  • Human Biodiversity Bibliography
  • Instauration Online
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Mondoweiss
  • National Justice Party
  • Occidental Dissent
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Paul Craig Roberts
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • Project Nova Europea
  • Radix Journal
  • RAMZPAUL
  • Red Ice
  • Richard Lynn
  • Rivers of Blood
  • Sobran's
  • The European Union Times
  • The Occidental Quarterly Online
  • The Political Cesspool
  • The Right Stuff
  • The Unz Review
  • Third Position Directory
  • VDare
  • Washington Summit Publishers
  • William McKinley Institute
  • XYZ: Australian Nationalist Site
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • X
  • Dribbble
Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only