• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

General

The Indian Immigration Kerfuffle—Part One 

January 10, 2025/1 Comment/in General/by Jocelynn Cordes

Over the course of the Christmas holidays, while reading posts from immigration proponents zealously defending the right (and imperative!) for Indians to be hired in the American tech sector, I have seen confirmed from Indians themselves many of the observations I make on a daily basis in the much humbler labor sector of manufacturing. I’d already encountered a rather accurate description of the Indian character as I experience it in Jayant Bhandari’s essay “IIndia: It’s Worse Than You Think, by Jayant Bhandari – The Unz Review,” posted on American Renaissance December 19th. I am a daily witness to some of Bhandari’s most damning conclusions about the nature of the Indian character and personality, most especially the precedence they accord their own over all others whenever possible. Add to this their disdain for their White co-workers, and you have an idea what the work atmosphere is like for blue-collar Americans.   

One wonders, of course, as many have over the past week, what supports this arrogance. I mean, it’s not like they’re French or anything, with a long history of creating a many-faceted culture the entire world has envied—and attempted to copy—for centuries. It’s India—hot, stinking, over-populated, feces-strewn India.  

Many participants in this social media kerfuffle have nailed the problems inherent in a liberal policy of Indian migration with deadly accuracy, even as ignorant detractors label them racists and xenophobes. The crux of the problem is that Indians don’t know where they are and do not have the capacity to understand the value of this place called America beyond what can be materially extracted from it. That’s a matter of values and sensibility, which many Americans, expressing themselves energetically on X, see clearly.  

It’s also worth reminding ourselves at this point of what Milo Yiannopoulos and Allum Bokhari had to say in their now famous essay on the alt-right, published in 2019. They wrote, 

For natural conservatives, culture, not economic efficiency, is the paramount value. More specifically, they value the greatest cultural expressions of their tribe. Their perfect society does not necessarily produce a soaring GDP, but it does produce symphonies, basilicas and Old Masters. The natural conservative tendency within the alt-right points to these apotheoses of western European culture and declares them valuable and worth preserving and protecting.

That was one of the clearest and most important descriptions of conservative values I’ve ever read, and those on social media decrying Indian immigration to the US have precisely those values in mind. The coarse, shallow, soulless interests of a people focused exclusively on their material prosperity, but who are at the same time incapable of reaching cultural heights themselves, will not allow the characteristics that underpinned Western cultural triumphs to flourish where their people have settled en masse. Americans instinctually know this, and are rising to the defense of these uniquely Western attributes, lest in time we find them buried under piles of putrid refuse. 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Jocelynn Cordes https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Jocelynn Cordes2025-01-10 08:11:062025-01-10 08:11:06The Indian Immigration Kerfuffle—Part One 

Elder Rape Is a Strength!

January 8, 2025/2 Comments/in General/by Ann Coulter

Elder Rape Is a Strength!

As part of the Biden administration’s push to make everything worse and more expensive, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) — not to be confused with Congress, which writes the laws because we live in a democracy ha ha ha — issued a prospective rule requiring nursing homes to hire more staff.

Because who better to determine the staffing needs of the country’s 15,000 nursing homes than Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Biden’s CMS administrator? Also supporting the new rule are “patient advocates,” i.e. the Service Employees International Union, looking to increase its membership rolls.

Fortunately, The New York Times reports, President-elect Donald Trump is expected to repeal the Biden staffing mandates.

Also fortunately, I have a much better idea! Like Brooks-LaSure, my expertise does not come from running nursing homes. It comes from reading the news.

Such as …

In 2018, hardworking Kenyan immigrant Billy Chemirmir enriched elderly nursing home patients in Texas by allegedly murdering at least 22 of them and stealing their jewelry. (Who will care for the elderly without mass third world immigration?) He was convicted in the first two trials and then killed in prison.

The year prior, Ethiopian immigrant Adeladilew A. Mekonen got 25 years after pleading guilty to sexually assaulting two patients at Providence St. Vincent Medical Center in Portland, Oregon, women aged 89 and 94. (By the way, why is an Ethiopian living in Portland?)

Third world immigrants are hard workers, though. Liberian George Kpingbah was a ripe old 77, but still managed to rape an elderly Alzheimer’s patient at the Walker Methodist Health Center in Minneapolis. This guy is a walking TV commercial for Cialis.

At the 2015 sentencing hearing, Kpingbah’s lawyer sought leniency on the grounds that the perp had “devoted much of his life to ensuring that his three daughters migrated to America,” as The Minnesota Star Tribune put it.

How can we ever thank you, Mr. Kpingbah?

In 2017, Parkpoom Seesangrit — you’ll never believe it, but yup, another immigrant — was convicted of raping a 69-year-old dementia patient at the East Longmeadow Skilled Nursing Center in Massachusetts. When the Thai national was caught by a nurse, he said, “I know I’m in trouble. This looks bad.”

Like so many immigrants, Seesangrit created another job right here in America: He needed a Thai interpreter at his trial. (Turns out our country is fairly bristling with Thais.)

In 2013, nursing assistant Antonio Nieto was convicted of sexually assaulting three female patients, aged 59, 73 and 93, in a Broomfield, Colorado, nursing home. In accordance with the Times Style Guide, the media refused to reveal where Nieto was from, but his lawyer said English was his second language and he needed a Spanish-language interpreter in court, so: Latin America.

In 2018, Ghanaian immigrant Fode Doukoure pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a 74-year-old woman after placing an anesthesia-soaked rag over her mouth.

May I speak with the people who hired these guys? The ones who thought cheap labor was worth placing men from raging rape cultures in charge of weak, elderly Alzheimer’s patients?

Why are you crying, Grandma? Hey! Where’s your diamond-encrusted brooch?

The media would sooner praise MAGA than admit that most of the world outside of the West is a cesspool of child rape, gang rape, elder rape, torture rape, goat rape, AIDS, multidrug-resistant gonorrhea and so on. But it’s not an impenetrable mystery, and when you’re hiring employees to work with helpless dementia patients, it’s kind of important to understand this aspect of non-Western culture.

I will briefly mention some suggestive facts about only the countries mentioned here, a subject I cover in detail in “Adios, America!”

Mass rape was a regular feature of Liberia’s 14-year civil war, as it is in most wars on the Dark Continent — also in response to minor skirmishes, celebrations, election seasons and filming a music video.

Kenya’s three-month election season, for example, features mass rapes committed by police, ordinary Kenyans and militia groups. (And you thought our elections were bad.)

During the two-year conflict in Tigray, Ethiopia, government forces raped hundreds of women, in front of friends and family, holding some as sex slaves for repeated gang rapes, sometimes inserting large nails, gravel, metal and plastic shrapnel into their victims’ vaginas, among other things. (On the plus side, none of them were fat-shamed or made to feel unheard.)

Thailand is ranked among the top 10 countries for violence against women and girls. Last year, 11 Thai police officers were charged with gang-raping a 14-year-old girl.

The Inter-American Children’s Institute reports that Latin America is second only to Asia in the sexual exploitation of women and children, who are “seen as objects instead of human beings with rights and freedoms.”

In 2018, naive British teenagers paid 1,200 pounds apiece to go on a class trip to “volunteer” in … Ghana. Whereupon armed Ghanaian and Nigerian men broke into their compound, beat and robbed the males and raped the girls and their female teacher for three hours, finally leaving at around 4 a.m.

Contra Brooks-LaSure, the last thing nursing homes need is more Kenyans, Ethiopians, Liberians, Thais and Latin Americans. What’s really needed is fewer rapes.

Here’s something useful Dr. Mehmet Oz could do at CMS that would create no additional paperwork or regulatory burden for nursing homes: Investigate every one of these monstrous crimes and widely publish the names and incomes of the facility owners and operators who thought the abuse of elderly Americans was a small price to pay for all that cheap foreign labor.

COPYRIGHT 2024 ANN COULTER

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Ann Coulter https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Ann Coulter2025-01-08 19:21:342025-01-08 19:21:34Elder Rape Is a Strength!

Constantin von Hoffmeister: Jean-Marie Le Pen and Joan of Arc

January 8, 2025/7 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald
Constantin von Hoffmeister

Jean-Marie Le Pen, gone at 96, will not rest in peace because peace never suited him. France, that twisted lover, a nation forever at war with her own skin, has buried him, the man who refused to bow to the new gods of “progress” and sameness. He snarled at the polite lies of modernity, tore through the lies like a wolf through silk. “We do not hate the Turks; we love them, but in their country,” he said, pulling the ghosts of old Europe out of their graves, his words a jagged blade. And Joan of Arc, centuries dead, heard him. She rose from her pyre, her armor scorched but shining. Joan loved the English — but only in their country. “I do love them,” she told her judges, her enemies, “but I love France more.” This is where Le Pen and Joan meet: in their refusal to kneel, in their love for something greater than themselves.

Joan, sixteen and feral, heard voices in the fields of Domrémy, herding sheep under a sky that bled holy light. Saints spoke to her — Michael, Catherine, Margaret — telling her to save France, to drive the English out, to crown Charles at Reims. She was not polite about it. She demanded an army, and she got one. Imagine her, a girl dressed as a boy, cutting through soldiers with a sword she claimed was from God. The enemy called her a witch, a whore, an abomination. France called her a savior. Le Pen was not guided by angels. He had his own visions. France, to him, was a woman bleeding out, her body pierced by the swords of globalization, immigration, and cultural decay. He was not gentle about it either. He did not save his France with a sword but with words — sharp, direct, unapologetic words.

Le Pen came out of the rubble of post-war France, a country broken and ashamed. Born in Brittany in 1928, he grew up with the humiliation of Vichy and the weight of a France that had lost her way. He joined the Foreign Legion, fought in Indochina and Algeria, wars that burned into him the belief that France was under siege. Not just by armies but by ideologies, by the creeping shadows of global homogenization. He was a soldier without a battlefield, so he made his own. The National Front, founded in 1972, became his weapon, his crusade. He spoke for the forgotten, the silenced, the angry. He called out the elites, the “colonizers of Brussels,” and the technocrats who, he believed, sold France’s soul for a seat at the globalist table. He wanted a pure France, a France of villages and cathedrals, not mosques and shopping malls. Joan would have understood.

Joan’s trial was hell, a circus of enemies eager to break her. The English hated her because she had humiliated them on the battlefield. The French Church hated her because she bypassed its authority. Her gender, her visions, her victories — they were too much for her time. She stood before her judges, unbroken, answering their traps with sharp, unyielding logic. They burned her anyway. Her ashes were scattered in the Seine, as if her fire could be extinguished. Le Pen was not burned, but he was tried again and again — in the courts, in the media, in the salons of Paris. They called him a racist, a xenophobe, a fascist. His words scorched; his sentences turned to fire. He never recanted. Like Joan, he refused to betray his mission.

Joan’s France was sacred, a kingdom ordained by God, her rivers and fields blessed by holy blood. Le Pen’s France was cultural, historical, a land of poets and farmers, of medieval spires and stubborn pride. He did not claim divine revelations. His message carried its own fervor. France, for him, was not just a place. She was a soulful woman who needed to be defended. He fought for her as Joan had fought centuries before, although their battles were different. Joan faced the swords and arrows of the English; Le Pen faced lawsuits, protests, and the scorn of a globalized world. Both stood their ground, defiant in the face of their enemies.

Joan rode into Orléans like a storm, her banner raised high, her soldiers roaring her name. The city was liberated; the tide of the war turned. She marched to Reims and crowned Charles VII, fulfilling her divine mission. But victory made her enemies more determined. When she was captured by the Burgundians and sold to the English, they sought to destroy her body as well as her spirit. Le Pen’s victories were not on the battlefield. They were in the polls. In 2002, he shocked France by reaching the second round of the presidential election, a moment that sent shockwaves through the establishment. His enemies tried to destroy him, but each trial only strengthened his legend among his followers.

Joan was declared innocent decades after her death, her name restored, her sainthood eventually secured. The Church canonized her in 1920, making her a symbol of French unity and faith. Le Pen, of course, will never be declared a saint. His legacy is tangled, controversial, loved and loathed in equal measure. But he did not need the Church’s approval. His sainthood, if it exists, lives in the hearts of his supporters, the millions who saw in him a defender of France. His daughter, Marine Le Pen, carries his banner now, softer in tone but carrying the same message: France must remain French. “I love them in their country,” Joan said. Jean-Marie Le Pen said after her: “We do not hate them; we love them, but in their country.”

Joan and Le Pen both understood the power of symbols. Joan’s banner, painted with the names of Jesus and Mary, led soldiers into battle, a visual manifestation of her divine mission. Le Pen invoked Joan as a symbol of nationalism, a saint who fought for France against foreign domination. Critics sneered, calling it opportunistic. For Le Pen’s followers, it was a spiritual connection: the maid of Orléans and the man from Brittany, both warriors for the glory of France. One wielded a sword, the other wielded words — both were willing to fight.

Le Pen was not loved by history, and neither was Joan, at least not in their lifetimes. Joan was burned alive, her ashes scattered to the wind. Le Pen was burned metaphorically, his reputation shredded, his words twisted, his image vilified. But history has a way of changing its mind. Joan became a saint, her story rewritten into a tale of heroism and faith. Le Pen’s story is not finished; his daughter’s rise and the continuing strength of the National Rally suggest that his ideal France might yet find its place.

Le Pen’s death marks the end of an era, but his legacy is alive, restless, and defiant. The National Rally, now rebranded but carrying the same fire, continues to rise. For his supporters, Le Pen was a politician and a prophet, a man who saw the dangers of globalization and the loss of identity long before others did. For his detractors, he will always be a demagogue, a voice of “hate.” But like Joan, Le Pen will not be forgotten. Both remain symbols of a France that refuses to bow, a France that fights for her soul.

The King is dead. Long live the King!

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-01-08 12:16:502025-01-08 12:16:50Constantin von Hoffmeister: Jean-Marie Le Pen and Joan of Arc

The Jimmy Carter Magic

January 7, 2025/7 Comments/in General/by Ann Coulter

The Jimmy Carter Magic

Carter is so often maligned for his stupidity, it tends to be forgotten that he was also self-righteous, incompetent, and backstabbing.

Out of respect for my old pal, Pat Caddell, I’ve let the encomiums to former President Jimmy Carter pollute the airwaves for the past two weeks without a peep out of me. Time’s up.

As you listen to liberals gloat about Carter’s dedication to “human rights,” recall just some of the human suffering this imbecile launched on the world.

Example No. 1: Carter went wild on the Helsinki accords, which were intended (by morons) to curb the Soviet Union’s monstrous repression of its own citizens, In fact, however, the Soviets not only ignored the accords, but actually used them to crackdown on dissidents. Anyone who attempted to monitor Soviet abuses under the agreement was arrested, imprisoned or exiled.

Paul Johnson described the policy in Modern Times:

“[T]he Helsinki process led directly to a resumption of widespread repression [in the USSR]…reaching a climax in the years after 1977. Leaders of the monitoring groups were the chief victims. In some cases the KGB followed a new policy of issuing dissenters with exit visas and driving them out of their own country. But many others got long prison sentences with forced labour.”

On the other hand, Carter got to brag about his deep commitment to human rights.

Example No 2: Carter’s gift to the world: Islamic lunacy.

Liberals had spent a quarter century bellyaching about the CIA’s role in toppling their beloved Mohammed Mossadegh and helping return the Shah of Iran to power back in 1953.

Mossadegh was the sort of authentic Third World dictator the left admires. Mossadegh may have impoverished his country, but he was lifey: He cried, fainted, and consulted his two-year-old granddaughter before making important government decisions. By contrast, the Shah was pro-Western and didn’t dress like a clown. He did not threaten to hurl Scud missiles at Israel. Liberals found him a bore.

To their delight, in 1978, Carter ostentatiously withdrew American support for the Shah, then stood idly by when, weeks later, he was deposed by a mob of Islamic fanatics.

Richard Falk of Princeton famously predicted that the incoming Ayatollah Khomeini “may yet provide us with a desperately needed model of humane governance for a third-world country.” Carter’s U.N. ambassador Andrew Young said Khomeini would “eventually be hailed as a saint.”

Like night follows day, soon after Carter allowed the pro-Western Shah to be deposed by a bloodthirsty Islamic mob, the mob seized the American embassy and took fifty-two Americans hostage. It was a living testament to liberal “diplomacy”: American citizens being held captive by angry barbarians in a frightening land.

For 444 days, the human rights of Americans suffered mightily, until the voters wisely removed Carter, and replaced him with Ronald Reagan, who preferred manly force to patient suasion when dealing with violent crazies.

The hostages were released the day Ronald Reagan was inaugurated — an event memorialized in a Jeff MacNelly cartoon showing Khomeini reading a telegram: “It’s from Ronald Reagan. It must be about one of the Americans in the Den of Spies, but I don’t recognize the name. It says ‘Remember Hiroshima.'”

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Ann Coulter https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Ann Coulter2025-01-07 11:25:072025-01-07 11:26:49The Jimmy Carter Magic

ABC’s Hostin: ‘You Don’t Move on’ from January 6 — It Was Like WWII, Holocaust, Slavery

January 6, 2025/6 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

Pretty much the worst event in human history. Just a little bit over the top. And she doesn’t seem to realize that Jewish orgs will be furious. The big H is unique and beyond comparison to anything—even the J6 horror.

ABC’s Hostin: ‘You Don’t Move on’ from January 6 — It Was Like WWII, Holocaust, Slavery

ABC News legal analyst Sunny Hostin said Monday on ABC’s “The View” that the United States should not “move on” from the events of January 6, 2021, because it “was one of the worst moments in American history” like World War II, the Holocaust and slavery.

Hostin said, “I think we need to find moral clarity you know in this country. And I just remember after January 6 you had someone like Mitch McConnell placing the blame on January 6 where it belonged squarely on Donald Trump’s shoulders and then you started seeing people backtrack that and losing their moral center. You had Condoleezza Rice, I believe, on this very show saying, you know, we need to move on from January 6.”

 

 

She continued, “I say no, you don’t move on because January 6 was an atrocity.”

Hostin added, “It was one of the worst moments in American history. And when you think about the worst moments in American history, you know, like World War II things like happened like the Holocaust, chattel slavery. We need to never forget because past becomes prologue if you forget and erase. We need to never forget because past becomes prologue if you forget and erase.”

Follow Pam Key on X @pamkeyNEN

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-01-06 16:12:142025-01-06 16:12:14ABC’s Hostin: ‘You Don’t Move on’ from January 6 — It Was Like WWII, Holocaust, Slavery

The Tech-Bro Apocalypse

January 5, 2025/6 Comments/in General/by Kevin MacDonald

A must read.

Matthew Louis on Gallows Humor:

The Tech-Bro Apocalypse

The Trump 2.0 honeymoon is over, and the marriage may be doomed…and it’s all about race after all.

Welp, we can stick the old fork in Elon, Vivek, and maybe MAGA. It turns out, as many suspected, that the current Trump coalition is something less than America First. Yeah, damage control has begun, message softening and backpedaling is underway, but that’s like Jeffrey Dahmer telling you he’s just into shakes and burgers now. We can’t unknow what we know, and like a certain famous book says, increaseth your knowledge, increaseth your sorrow.

We’ve definitely increased our knowledge, and hence our sorrow, with regard to Trump’s main proxies, and the agenda of Trump 2.0.

It all began some time around Christmas, with a little harmless Twittering between Elon and his public, about the former’s desire to ramp up the importation of Indian “talent.” But it quickly spiraled, and then spiraled some more, and soon became the bitterest of debates about nothing but race…although many don’t want to admit the debate is about nothing but race.

Now the debate is an all-out right-wing dogfight, with not only no resolution in sight, but no resolution possible. Elon has, for practical purposes, imploded. When various MAGA hardliners and “far right” influencers began mauling him, “ratio-ing” him, embarrassing him on the issue of Indian imports, he—assuming he’s even a real person—responded by stripping his critics’ account privileges, actually nuking numerous accounts, and announcing a new shadow-banning algorithm. He further responded by shifting fully into blue-haired rage mode, calling his critics—what else?—racists, telling them to “take a big step back and FUCK [THEMSELVES] in the face,” and declaring that anyone more radical than Jeb Bush will be removed “root and stem” from the American right.

Yes, that is our flagship free-speech platform, as overseen by the era’s principal crusader against wokeness.

Then it got more absurd. Seeing that his comrade was self-immolating, Vivek showed up to douse the flames…with a bucket of kerosene. In a brief X essay, the swami of rami explained that American culture is garbage, due to its lionization of dumb jocks and its proclivity for brain-rotting entertainment…as opposed to the diligent nerd ethic that supposedly drives our deep-brown saviors…the implication being that Indians, and presumably any other aliens who manage to set foot on US soil, are objectively, quantitatively—by default, even—superior to Americans.

A rather insane thing to say to the blue- and white-collar white Americans who are the backbone of Trumpism…people whose dads, brothers, and grandpas—and who often enough, themselves—have regularly lined up to kill and die for whatever the fuck America is. But, you see, the vision of the “tech bros”—of the Elons and Viveks and the Silicon Valley kingpins who have purchased Trumpism—is not of a nation that some set of specific people call home, but simply of a place where profitability is maximized by whoever evinces the most cut-throat shrewdness, and whoever will work the hardest for the least pay.

Pick up my guitar and play, just like yesterday…

The desire to get rich, and the willingness to work 18-hour days and sleep 18 to a room, is—they are telling us—what makes one American. Period.

And that, folks, is the actual fault-line on the right; that’s what regularly causes our bitterest divisions, dating back to Pat Buchanan’s slug-fests with the neocons. Is America a Western nation with a particular history, or is it a mere rule-book that anyone “seeking a better life” can follow? That’s the very fault-line Trump stomped on, causing the political earthquakes we’re all familiar with, when he said Mexico isn’t sending its best. And that is, in fact, the only real theme of Trumpism. Reality-TV Trump became President Trump, you may remember, because he explicitly and unequivocally promised to wall us off from brown people, to give blue-collar jobs back to rednecks, and to end political correctness…i.e., to end the requirement that we mince words about this shit.

All else is window dressing. Like it or not, MAGA boils down, just like the commies say, to white America’s profound and utter fatigue with multiculturalism. The Trump base loves its bombastic blacks, its heroic Hindus, its face-tattooed hip-hop clowns, and its trannies and faggots, because it is presumed that these people will facilitate policy changes by attracting voters…and the precise nature of the hoped-for policy changes is, ironically enough, returning us to standards that minimize normal White Americans having to deal with the aforementioned.

MAGA, in short, is now and has never been anything but, an attempt to get back to Norman Rockwell America—or at all events, to move as far as possible in that direction—by enduring whatever freaks and aliens are necessary (Trump himself is a bit of a freak, after all), and attenuating and dressing up the message in whatever way is necessary.

That, and nothing more, is what the apocalyptic “crash-out” of Elon and Vivek illustrates. The underlying debate, as I said, is strictly racial. It’s been brought into high-def clarity by the fact that the race at issue is Indians who—Vivek and Mrs. Vance notwithstanding—are as aesthetically antithetical to Americanism as turds are to punch bowls. I mean, Blacks at least have jive and swagger, and they are at any rate baked into the American cake. Latinos, likewise, as our next-door neighbors, have been spicing up Americana from the beginning, and come with free chips and salsa, and decent beer. Indians, though, at scale—with any level of visibility or influence beyond the token Westernized pundit and a cartoon character warbling about slushies—offer essentially nothing…that is, nothing that Americans find intriguing, useful, or even pleasant. We share zero history with them, they have a peculiar relationship with feces, and they have peculiar smells and peculiarer physiognomy. They are, by every metric, on the average, an acute cramp in the national style.

But that’s just my sense of it. And probably yours. And in point of fact, the sense of alien repulsion is mutual. Scratch the surface of the typical Indian and you find seething anti-White hatred…as one of Elon’s top employees demonstrated…and as Vivek himself subtly but unmistakably demonstrated in his X essay.

Only bigots don’t want to import this.

But who says that every human group has to be in love with every other human group? What I’m saying—and what the Trump base is saying, whether it knows it or not—is that’s the whole point of nations. Why are we pretending that America wasn’t founded by a bunch of Anglo-Saxon racialists who envisioned a White, culturally Christian utopia? And why are we pretending that that wasn’t the central, presupposed, defining American vision right up to, like, yesterday? And the big question is: What in the fuck is wrong with that? Japan is Japan, with its own people. Nigeria is Nigeria. Mexico is Mexico. Etc. Mix in other people, put other people in charge, and soon enough Japan and Nigeria and Mexico are just going to be names for completely different cultures, societies, and aggregations of DNA.

Same with America. It’s a place where White immigrants came to seek opportunity, under an Anglo-Saxon ethos, and to continue themselves as new blends of White people, in perpetuity. Around the edges there was the holdover from the slave population, bleedover from Latin America, a few Indians of the feather variety, a Chinatown or two…but that was around the edges. There’s a reason why Norman Rockwell’s subject matter was exactly what it was. That reason is that America had—and underneath the encrusted grime of our current culture, still has—a very specific, very White, and very Christian identity.

The tech-bro vision completely, and intentionally, negates that history. In fact, the tech-bro vision is just the flipside of the shitlib vision. It is profit-seeking as an end in itself, as opposed to shitlibs’ wealth redistribution as an end in itself. But to what ultimate end are we seeking our profit? Elon talks about “winning”—but winning what, exactly? Spiritual questions aside, the less your ancestors’ legacies exist, the less physical territory is exclusive to your people, the less your cultural traditions and fucking DNA exist, the less you’re winning…period.

The tech bros tell us we must prioritize “competition” and “meritocracy,” but why? If Brad Pitt makes a play for my wife, should I shrug and say, “Well, Brad is richer and handsomer, after all”? Should I eat a bullet because I’m not Brad Pitt? Should I abstract it out to the improvement of mankind as a whole, because Brad has better genes to pass along? Or should I strive to keep what I have, and to continue myself, for no fucking other reason than that I am myself?

The tech-bro paradigm does, as I said, precisely what the shitlib paradigm does. It’s designed to put us—namely, “legacy Americans”—in the position of having to justify our existence. If we can’t explain why we’re good enough, within their arbitrary frameworks, we forfeit our right to continue as a people. If we’re not “anti-racist” enough according to the shitlibs, or “pro-competition” enough according to the tech bros, we are morally…and it just so happens, genetically…obsolete.

A crash course in Trumpism.

And, having put it in those terms, let’s just call the tech-bro op what it is: another globalist, even communistic, anti-White con. I reject all its premises. As Americans, we have every right to tell people to fuck off to wherever they come from, and to never show their alien faces in these parts again, no matter how many hours they want to work for how little pay. Why? For no other reason than they aren’t us. For no other reason than have a look at my Norman Rockwell calendar. Sure, give us a 10, 20, 50 percent reduction in marketplace viability…so what? We will still exist, as us. We can improve, as us, if we care to. We can share our wealth more equitably, or we can train for higher productivity. But first, and primarily, we have to exist. If we fail at that, we fail completely. If America continues under the title “America,” but every public place looks and smells like a third-world flea market, it doesn’t matter how much your bank account or mine runneth over. We’ve lost everything.

And, of course, the idea that we need non-Westerners is rank bullshit anyway. Indians, Africans, Latin Americans, and everyone else in the “developing world” is clawing over each other to gain entrance into white countries precisely because Westerners don’t need them. Our societies are clean, safe, technologically advanced, etc. because, to put it plainly, we’re fucking awesome. You know just like I do that without a single brown or black or even yellow face, every Western country—from down under to the whole of Europe to Canada to the US and throw in South Africa—would be operating at its respective optimum. The infrastructures, the courts, the art and culture, the general happiness, name it…all systems go, and no need for any paragons of diversity to subject themselves to any systemic injustice or microaggressions.

That is…if you want the unvarnished, Trumpian truth. Remember when the Donald said, “We don’t have time for political correctness,” and the whole right broke out into applause and cheering? Well, this is what that looks like. This is all we were ever talking about. Countries are shitholes, or countries are relative utopias, because of the aggregations of brainpower and social instincts of the people in the countries. Western countries are relative utopias, every single time, because Western peoples are what they are. America is America because of the “whiteness” that we associate with it. If we lie about that—if we have to lie about it because of “competition” or “anti-racism” or any other moralistic blackmail scheme—well, then, we might as well have run fucking Jeb in 2016, and just resigned ourselves to what the shitlibs and tech bros have planned for us.

Gallows Humor Magazine is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2025-01-05 19:22:302025-01-05 19:22:30The Tech-Bro Apocalypse

The Hite Three

January 4, 2025/5 Comments/in Featured Articles, General/by Robert S. Griffin, Ph.D.

The Hite Three, as I call them, are three precepts, prescriptions, rules to live by, somewhere in there, that you might want to try out to see how they work for you. Hite refers to Shere Hite, a woman who was big in American life back in the 1970s and ‘80s. She came up with the Hite Three, though she didn’t call them that.
Shere Hite was best known for a book she wrote in 1976 on women’s sexuality that sold in the multi-millions called The Hite Report. She wrote other books, all of them on sexual practices and perspectives, men’s as well as women’s, that got attention though none made a splash like The Hite Report.

The Hite Report

This is not the place to go into The Hite Report’s content in any detail. Enough to say here that it was controversial. A major example, Hite’s claim that women do way better coming to an orgasm through masturbation than from someone lying on top of them thrusting in and out, which results in them faking it a lot of the time. You might want to read the book. It’ll give you a sense of the who-needs-men posture of the emerging second wave women’s movement in those years, as well as the tone of the ‘70s in general.

The success of The Hite Report was increased by the “wow” quality of young, glamorous, fashion-model-esque, super cool Shere Hite, who was everywhere in the media—TV, newspapers, and magazines, including nude Playboy poses. No internet back then of course.

Shere Hite

Here’s a video of her in 1976:

Hite came to my attention recently watching an excellent 2023 documentary on her, “The Disappearance of Shere Hite,” something else you might want to check out. The actress Dakota Johnson—Don’s daughter with Melanie Griffith for those of you old enough to remember–was major in producing it and does the voice of Hite when needed.

The Disappearance of Shere Hite

The title of the documentary gets at the fact about Shere Hite that particularly intrigued me and got me thinking: in 1990, she disappeared from view. She went from being in the public consciousness to, in a flash, no segue, no farewell speech, gone, and for good. According to the documentary, she got fed up with the static she was getting about her books and her persona and decided who needs it and hit the road.

What had been going on, and it was intensifying, is that men in particular weren’t taking to Hite telling them—or so they thought anyway, I think they were overreacting—that they were needy and unnecessary annoyances in women’s lives. A lot of people, women as well as men, came at the validity of the research methodology Hite employed to generate the data that supported her conclusions. She distributed surveys with open-ended questions here, there, and everywhere, and people mailed in completed surveys to her in New York City. She based The Hite Report on what the 3,000 women who chose to mail in their surveys reported. By the way, nobody ever questioned Hite’s work ethic—she toiled away day and night to get The Hite Report and her other books out.

To be sure, the survey responses Hite compiled for The Hite Report didn’t comprise a representative sample of all women, but she came on as if it did. If I’d been around her, I would have suggested she acknowledge that her data didn’t hold up as a random sample, but still, what 3, 000 women, and that’s a lot of people, think about their sex lives, whether or not they are representative of the total population of women, should prompt the rest of us to think through how we come down on these same concerns, and that’s a worthwhile activity apart from whether or not her pool of respondents to her surveys would pass muster in Statistics 201.

Another criticism of Hite is that some people were rubbed the wrong way by what they perceived as her haughty, better-than-thou manner. Not me. In the clips I’m seen of her, I found her to be articulate, gracious, and charming.

The documentary reveals that Hite went to Europe and stayed there until her death in 2020 at seventy-seven after years of suffering from a Parkinson’s-like illness. I find it hard to imagine young, vital, beautiful Shere Hite as a physically ill, diminished, dying old woman. I don’t know of pictures of her after she dropped out of sight, so Shere Hite remains, per the Bob Dylan song, forever young.

From the documentary, I picked up on what I’m calling the Hite Three that she used as personal guidelines, including cutting out for Europe. I’ve thought about them and put my twist on them and tried them out and they’ve seemed to help me live better.

The three:
1. Take your life very seriously. As time goes along, do what you can to boost your “take my life seriously” level and be vigilant to anybody or anything that lowers it. This can get subtle: A relationship can be good but at the same time trivialize your existence. An article, say in this internet magazine, can be excellent but make you feel as if you are on the outside looking in at life’s drama. A conference speaker can make a superb presentation and leave you feeling that he is the star of the show, standing up high, in the spotlight, and you’re a lesser being in the audience, sitting down, in the dark. Tucker Carlson could do a fine interview and the best thing you can think of to do after it is watch LeBron James shoot free throws. The ideal is to develop a healthy perversity of sorts: if somebody/something, which includes what you think and do, cues you to take your life less seriously, make that a prod to take yourself more seriously.

2. If anybody is laying a negative concept of who you are on you, leave. Leaving can be what Hite did, vacating the premises, heading out to New Mexico or going in the next room or to the garage to work on your car. It can also mean leaving in place, as it were: right here, don’t go anywhere, make the other person invisible, no energy positive or negative sent in his/her direction; you’re in the room but not in the room as far as this person is concerned. Speaking of Bob Dylan, a couple nights ago I watched the documentary “Dont Look Back” (Dont is not a typo) about his 1965 concert tour of Britain. The singer Joan Baez, who once was personally close to Dylan and seemed to think she still was, was smiling and chattering away a few feet from him, but to Dylan it was if she wasn’t there. He didn’t as much as look at her. No animosity, no coolness toward her, no agenda with her at all, just nothing. She finally went back to the U.S., and you might imagine Dylan’s reaction, or better, non-reaction, to that. I’d put what Dylan did in the category of leaving.

3. For three days, shut your personal act down. Get away from everything and everybody, which in our time, for just about all of us, means work, people, rituals and habits, the entertainment industry, news shows, the internet, social media, and texting. Just you here and now, a walk by the lake, cook a meal, sit in a chair. Books and movie streaming and journal writing are OK, or I guess, or maybe not, I don’t know. Another metaphor to get at this idea, put a “Closed” sign on the door of your particular business, what you try to sell to your customers (the people in your life) every day all day. No to-do list for the three days, no topics and issues to ponder. Breathe in and breathe out and let whatever comes up present itself to you, and if you want to, think about it, give it meaning, identify its implications, and if you don’t have the impulse to do any of that, that’s fine too. Another way to say it: for three days, don’t do, be.

I did the three-day shut down. It’s not necessary to get into what came out of it for me. Enough to say it was well worth my time and I recommend doing it.

As for the two other “Hites” during the three days:

Not that I’m not taking my life seriously now, but I should take it more seriously. During the backed-off time, what and who (including me) is impeding getting that done came into focus.

And yes, I have to some leaving. And since the opposite of a good thing is most often also a good thing, I have to get better at staying. I need to say YES rather than yes to some people.

It’s only been a few weeks, but I’ve already gotten on with doing some good things in a “Hite” direction, which has been gratifying and encouraging. I feel—and I mean that literally, the organism I experience, feel, as me—clearer and stronger, less vulnerable, and more directed after working with the Hite Three, enough to put the energy into writing this up. Your call as to what, if anything, to do with what’s here.

 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Robert S. Griffin, Ph.D. https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Robert S. Griffin, Ph.D.2025-01-04 09:10:172025-01-05 09:46:38The Hite Three
Page 61 of 184«‹5960616263›»
Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Keep Up To Date By Email

Subscribe to get our latest posts in your inbox twice a week.

Name

Email


Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

  • A2Z Publications
  • American Freedom Party
  • American Mercury
  • American Renaissance
  • Arktos Publishing
  • Candour Magazine
  • Center for Immigration Studies
  • Chronicles
  • Council of European Canadians
  • Counter-Currents
  • Curiales—Dutch nationalist-conservative website
  • Denmark's Freedom Council
  • Diversity Chronicle
  • Folktrove: Digital Library of the Third Way
  • Human Biodiversity Bibliography
  • Instauration Online
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Mondoweiss
  • National Justice Party
  • Occidental Dissent
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Paul Craig Roberts
  • PRIVACY POLICY
  • Project Nova Europea
  • Radix Journal
  • RAMZPAUL
  • Red Ice
  • Richard Lynn
  • Rivers of Blood
  • Sobran's
  • The European Union Times
  • The Occidental Quarterly Online
  • The Political Cesspool
  • The Right Stuff
  • The Unz Review
  • Third Position Directory
  • VDare
  • Washington Summit Publishers
  • William McKinley Institute
  • XYZ: Australian Nationalist Site
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • X
  • Dribbble
Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only