Jeremy’s Jackboots: Even More Jewish Hysteria about Jeremy Corbyn and the British Labour Party

“Gobsmacked” is a good English word that’s gaining ground in America, I’ve read. If it’s not familiar to you, it means “very surprised or otherwise affected,” like someone who has been unexpectedly smacked in the gob, or mouth. I’ve recently been gobsmacked not once but twice by a Scottish journalist called Stephen Daisley.

Corbyn’s a monster, Blair’s a mensch

My first gobsmacking from Daisley came when I read this article by him in the cuckservative Spectator:

A vote for Labour is a vote for anti-semitism

The Labour party (1900 – 2015) is dead. It died the day a majority of members, £3 and otherwise, voted to make their leader a man already plainly drenched in the moral sewage of anti-Semitism. The Labour party (2015 – ) is Corbyn’s party and if the famous centrists are working to preserve any party, it is that one. They might eventually salvage something out of it — Corbynism without Corbyn — but they will remain culpable for his actions until then.

Every vote for Labour is a vote for Corbyn. Every leaflet delivered is a two-fingered salute to British Jews. Every door knocked is a declaration: this is who I am and this is my tribe. You can campaign for Labour and vote for Labour without being an anti-Semite but in doing either you announce that you have reached an accommodation with anti-Semitism. Colluding in the organisation of politics against the Jews is worth it to get the railways renationalised.

The Labour party is going to fail the anti-Semitism test and the country might too. (A vote for Labour is a vote for anti-semitism, The Spectator, 29th October 2019)

As you can see, Daisley thinks that Jeremy Corbyn (often nicknamed Jezza) killed the Labour party by becoming its leader in 2015. Obviously, then, Daisley also thinks that Labour was alive and well under the leadership of Tony Blair. You remember Blair, don’t you? He’s the devious narcissist who lied the UK into a disastrous war in Iraq that killed huge numbers of innocent people and that directly led to the rise of the head-choppers and sex-slavers of Islamic State. Blair also nefariously opened Britain’s borders to migrants not just from Eastern Europe, who undercut the wages of Labour’s traditional supporters in the White working-class, but also from the Third World, who set about raping and sexually enslaving the daughters of those traditional Labour supporters.

Porcine punims

Having left office after these crimes, Blair began piling up a vast fortune (now possibly well north of £100 million) as he was rewarded by the greedy and amoral globalists for whom he had worked so hard as prime minister. Jeremy Corbyn resolutely opposed Blair’s Iraq disaster and is not interested in money or material possessions. Yet it’s Corbyn, not Blair, who’s “drenched” in “moral sewage,” and it’s Corbyn, not Blair, who “killed” the Labour party – according to Stephen Daisley. And this brings me to the second gobsmacking I’ve received from Daisley. I looked for photographs of him and found these:

The porcine punim of Stephen Daisley

The porcine punim again

I have never seen a more porcine and less trustworthy punim (which is Yiddish for “face”). And I doubt I ever will. Daisley looks as though he’s in training to play the role of the giant slug-like villain Jabba the Hutt in a remake of one of those old Star Wars movies. But I’m glad Daisley looks like that, because it means his punim is as repulsive as his ideology. I’m no fan of Jeremy Corbyn, believe me. But clearly he’s a far less immoral person than Tony Blair and has been responsible for far less evil in the world. Corbyn opposes war and the military-industrial complex. Blair supports war and has grown rich by working for the military-industrial complex.

Smirk Makes Free

But Blair’s crimes and immorality don’t matter to Daisley because he’s applying only one criterion: “Is it good for the Jews?” And Daisley used exactly that phrase in an article he wrote for the Jewish Chronicle in 2017: “If we apply the Bubbe Barometer — ‘Is it good for the Jews?’ — it’s difficult to conclude that the outcome of the general election passes muster.” It’s easy to get the impression from the article that Daisley himself is Jewish — few goyim know that bubbe is Yiddish for “grandmother,” for example — but I can’t find any clear statement to that effect. One thing is sure: he behaves as though he’s Jewish, with an unfailing self-righteousness and insistence that Jewish interests must be at the centre of British politics.

Smirk Makes Free #1: That “True Friend of the Jewish community” Tony Blair

That’s why Daisley hates Jeremy Corbyn and claims that “A vote for Labour is a vote for anti-semitism.” Corbyn’s leadership isn’t good for the Jews, whereas Blair’s leadership was very good for the Jews. The Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz said that Blair is “generally regarded as the most pro-Israel prime minister in British history.” Marie van der Zyl, head of the Jewish Board of Deputies, has recently “praised Mr Blair as a ‘true friend’ of the Jewish community.” In other words, Blair followed Jewish orders, so it didn’t matter that he was an enemy of Labour’s traditional supporters in the White working-class. Indeed, being a “true friend of the Jewish community” automatically entails being an enemy of the White British and their interests. And so Blair appointed the highly ethnocentric Jew Barbara Roche as his immigration minister and allowed her to flood Britain with tax-eating, crime-committing Third-Worlders. Jeremy Corbyn, of course, is also fully in favour of Third-World immigration, but that’s one of the paradoxes of Jewish Corbynophobia.

Smirk Makes Free #2: Sinister Minister Barbara Roche

Jews attack Corbyn for endorsing and encouraging anti-Semitism, but the worst and most active anti-Semites are non-White Muslims, whose presence in Britain is both owed to and warmly supported by organized Jewry. Barbara Roche told the Guardian in 2001 that she “entered politics — she still emphasises this today — to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” In 2011, she viewed the Balkanization of London approvingly “over the rim of her cup of Americano coffee” and cooed to the Guardian that “I love the diversity of London. … I just feel comfortable.”

“One of the Jewish community’s greatest champions”

Do the ordinary Whites murdered, raped, robbed or driven from their homes by Roche’s Third-World allies feel “comfortable”? No, they don’t, but Roche doesn’t care about them. Their complaints are dismissed as racist or ignored altogether. Remember that, in Stephen Daisley’s porcine eyes, the Labour party was still alive and well when Labour councillors in Rotherham and many other places refused to help the White working-class girls being preyed on by Muslim rape-gangs.

Denis MacShane, the slug-like Labour MP for Rotherham, also refused to help. He was too busy working for the only people he really cared about: Jews in far-off London. After MacShane was jailed for fraud in 2013, the Jewish Chronicle saluted him as “one of [the Jewish community’s] greatest champions.” But MacShane wasn’t elected to champion Jews — he was elected to champion the White working-class. The clue is in the name of MacShane’s party. It’s called the Labour Party, not the Jewish Party or the Zionist Party. But the Jewish Chronicle has never criticized MacShane for betraying his White constituents in Rotherham. After all, what do they matter? It’s Jews who matter, as the Chronicle has once again emphasized under the headline “Are these antisemitism figures high enough for you, Mr Corbyn?” The article below runs thus:

Yet again, the six-monthly figures from the Community Security Trust [CST] show a record number of antisemitic incidents — and a further ten per cent rise in the number recorded between January and June of this year and the same period in 2018. In all but two months since April 2016 there have been more than a hundred recorded incidents — a level of antisemitic abuse and attack that was previously seen only when Israel was at war.

But the cause of this ongoing record increase in antisemitism is no mystery. It can be summed up in two words: Jeremy Corbyn. So we address this directly to the Labour leader: Are these figures high enough for you, Mr Corbyn?

Because, by any objective analysis of contemporary British antisemitism, Mr Corbyn must be seen as the instigator. Over the almost four years of his leadership, Mr Corbyn has refused to take any meaningful action against antisemitism in his party and has merely mouthed platitudes. …

More widely, Mr Corbyn has injected a poison into British politics and turbocharged the levels of open antisemitism in British society.

These CST figures are Jeremy Corbyn’s legacy. They are the legacy of the most dangerous racist in British politics — a man whose toxic views and behaviour pose a far greater threat to ethnic minorities than the National Front or the BNP ever managed. The figures should shame Mr Corbyn.

But, as the past four years have shown, he has no sense of shame. (Are these antisemitism figures high enough for you, Mr Corbyn?, The Jewish Chronicle, 2nd August 2019 / 1st Av 5779)

Myself, I’d say that it’s the Jewish Chronicle and the CST who have “no sense of shame.” Muslims are vastly over-represented among those responsible for “antisemitic abuse and attack.” And it is Jews who are both responsible for and warmly supportive of Muslim immigration. The very same Community Security Trust that is complaining about an increase in “antisemitism” is also helping the Muslim organization Tell MAMA (Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks) to increase its political power and influence. The Jewish Chronicle reported in 2014 that “British Jewry’s leading communal security expert” will help the “Muslim group Tell MAMA tackle Islamophobia.” The “communal security expert” is called Richard Benson and he was the “chief executive” of the Community Security Trust for twelve years.

Jews have been “utterly betrayed”

In other words, Jews have created the problems that they are complaining so loudly about. Corbyn’s minority worship and Islamophilia are standard parts of Jewish ideology. The problem is that he neglects an even more important part of Jewish ideology: to obey Jews without question. And so Corbyn has been relentlessly attacked by Jews and their shabbos goyim. The cuckservative Spectator, which has just announced that “[I]t’s time to offer citizenship to illegal immigrants,” is now publishing a stream of Jeremiads (a real word meaning “a prolonged lamentation or complaint”) against Corbyn. As we’ve seen, Stephen Daisley thinks that Corbyn has killed Tony Blair’s good and decent Labour party. The Jewish journalist Karen Glaser has explained why “Jews are scared of a Corbyn government.” Among much else, Corbyn once defended a mural that promoted “the pernicious association between Jews and money,” which is, Glaser notes, “a deeply anti-Semitic trope that stretches back to medieval times.”

Another Jewish journalist, Tanya Gold, has written another Jeremiad under the headline: “‘Utterly betrayed’: Britain’s Jews are now politically homeless.” Gold says that “Most Jews [in Britain] now live in a state of existential fear” thanks to a Labour leader who hobnobs with Hamas and Hezbollah. Hamas is the anti-Semitic party that governs the Gaza Strip and Hezbollah is an anti-Semitic Shi’ite militia in Lebanon that’s closely allied with Israel’s great enemy Iran. But Iran, Lebanon and the Gaza Strip are a very long way from Britain. Hamas and Hezbollah have growing support and influence in Britain for only one reason: Muslim immigration.

The porcine punim (and other parts) of Tanya Gold

And Jews like Tanya Gold — whose surname, you might think, promotes a “pernicious association between Jews and money” — have always warmly supported Muslim immigration. And can you guess who’s a warm supporter of Muslims and free-speech-hating Muslim organizations like Tell MAMA? Why it’s Stephen Daisley, who has told readers of the Spectator that “Banning Halal and Kosher slaughter would be un-British”:

When Rod Liddle quips about holding the General Election on a day when ‘Muslims are forbidden to do anything on pain of hell’, he is indulging in the downwards-punching satire of the powerless that so delights his legion [of] fans. He is kidding but ‘kidding on the square’, as the late, great Mose Allison would have put it. Middle age is the point where one begins to mistake acid reflux for everyman insight. British Muslims — subjected to more than 3,000 hate incidents last year — are tough enough to withstand blunt barbs of any Tesco Value Ann Coulter, but this yearning to exclude them from civil society speaks to an intolerance of religious and cultural difference. (Banning Halal and Kosher slaughter would be un-British, The Spectator, 1st November 2019)

How many “hate incidents” were British Whites subjected to last year at the hands of Muslims and other non-Whites? Stephen Daisley doesn’t care. Like Marie van der Zyl, Dennis MacShane, Karen Glaser and Tanya Gold, he cares only about the welfare of Jews.

Merk Makes Free

Jeremy Corbyn doesn’t care about the welfare of Whites either, but that isn’t why Jews hate him and are working so hard to prevent him from becoming the next prime minister. Unlike the hugely wealthy war-criminal Tony Blair, Corbyn isn’t a “true friend of the Jewish community.” He doesn’t obey Jewish orders and he doesn’t make Jewish interests his first and only concern. That’s why he won’t be following Angela Merkel onto the podium at the World Jewish Congress:

World Jewish Congress President Ronald S. Lauder on 28 October honored Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany Angela Merkel with the 2019 WJC Theodor Herzl Award, which recognizes outstanding individuals who work to promote Herzl’s ideals for a safer, more tolerant world for the Jewish people. The award ceremony was held at the Jewish community center in Munich, co-hosted by President of the Jewish Community of Munich and Upper Bavaria & WJC Commissioner for Holocaust Memory Dr. Charlotte Knobloch.

Thanking WJC President Lauder, Chancellor Merkel expressed her heartfelt gratitude for the honor of being chosen as the recipient of this award, saying: “It is humbling for me that I, as a German chancellor, can receive the Theodor Herzl Award today. Jewish life in Germany must be supported – and protected.” (WJC honors German Chancellor Angela Merkel with 2019 WJC Theodor Herzl Award)

Merk Makes Free: Angela Merkel accepts the World Jewish Congress award

By opening Germany’s borders to more than a million Muslims and other non-Whites, Angela Merkel caused huge and lasting harm to the welfare of German Whites. Like Blair, Merkel is a traitor to her nation. And like Blair, Merkel proves again that being a “true friend of the Jewish community” automatically entails being an enemy of Whites and their interests. If Jews truly cared about “anti-Semitism,” they would not welcome Muslim immigration and reward politicians like Blair and Merkel for massively increasing it.

The real killers of Labour

In fact, Jews benefit from anti-Semitism, because it allows them to play their favourite role of victim and to demand ever-tougher laws against the interests of the European Whites whom they see as their true enemies. That’s why Jews think the war-criminal Tony Blair is a “true friend.” Blair obeyed Jews and killed Arabs. It’s also why Jews are wailing in hysteria about the pacifist Jeremy Corbyn and the way he has “injected … poison into British politics.” Corbyn won’t obey Jews and won’t be killing any Arabs if he becomes prime minister.

Corbyn didn’t kill the Labour party either. As I described in “Working-Class Zero,” the Labour party was killed long ago, when it abandoned the White working-class and began to work against them instead. And who was responsible for that? It was Jews like Lord Goodman, Sir Samuel Fisher, and Rudy Sternberg, who funded and controlled the corrupt Labour prime minister Harold Wilson in the 1960s, and Jews like Anthony Lester and Jim Rose, who began the war on free speech that Jews like Pamela Geller are lamenting today (while censoring comments about Jews like Lester). As the old Polish saying goes: “The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.”

53 replies
  1. cecil1
    cecil1 says:

    Judaizing requires the DESTRUCTION of every kind of identity that is not the preservation of Jews. If you do not demand the destruction of all loyalties except loyalty to Jews, God’s Chosen People, you are committing blasphemy in the eyes of Jewish Law AND gentile judaizers alike

    Our destruction is the first law of Judaism. Our destruction is a natural consequence, a fundamental DEMAND, of the Jewish outlook on life.

    If my race is to survive, we must stop people who are judaizing us in our own nations. Most of them today are NOT Jews.

    There should be a place for Jews. It should be a place where they will stop controlling US and can only spread that hostility to each other.

    • Uk homo sap
      Uk homo sap says:

      Too true.

      Berkowitz former jewish speaker of the H. of Commons stated in recent interview video on Britain GQ with aider in war crimes Alaistair Campbell that he has never detected a whiff of anti-semitism from Corbyn.

  2. Aitch.
    Aitch. says:

    Anyone remember pig-faced Harold Wilson’s crooked Jewish crony, the raincoat king ‘Lord’ Kagan? We haven’t really come very far since those days, have we?

  3. Arlene Johnson
    Arlene Johnson says:

    As a Fabian, Jeremy Corbyn would destroy Great Britain as Fabianism is communism. So correct me if I’m wrong, but because the Zionists created communism, Jeremy Corbyn could be a Zionist just as Tony Blair is since Tony Blair is a Fabian too. Knight of Malta 33 degree Scottish Rite Freemason Tony Blair is a FABIAN.   So is Jeremy Corbyn  – The Enemy Within

    Understanding communism today and its far reaching effects on our society through institutions like the Fabian Society, and understanding its ultimate aim to destroy Nations, Cultures and Traditions in order to bring about a One World Government.. Known today as the New World Order. 38 minutes

    As for the Israelis, they created both Hezbollah and Hamas. See 2:21 which says that both Hezbollah and Hamas were created by the state of Israel. My link only says Hamas was created by the state of Israel, and why it created it.

    As for anti-semitism, see

    Not in my work, but an excellent description of Anti-semitism:

    People who take up the sword against so-called “anti-Semitism” generally have no understanding of what they are saying. They are psychologically conditioned to react to a label, the bottle of which is without content but adduced as an instrument of dishonest political strategy. Approximately ninety per cent. of modern Jewry is not Semitic but of Ashkenazic central European origin. The numerically few Sephardim only are Semitic. Moreover the Arabic peoples, who comprise a large segment of humanity are Semitic. Many critics and commentators do not even spell the word correctly, which error speaks to their gross ignorance of the subject and the prevailing low level of academic rigour–or integrity, whichever the case may be.
Anyone who is familiar with the writings of early Zionist protagonists will have observed that they adopted “anti-Semitism” as a primary strategic weapon essential to achievement of their ultimate policies and objectives. In other words, where it did not exist it would have to be created. The term must be inculcated incessantly in the public psyche by constant discussion in the information media and “educational” institutions. Guilt is a potent factor in determining human action. If it can be implanted in the human mind it can be employed as a powerful abstract instrument to influence human behaviour. 
Unless self-righteous zealots and/or sentimentalists, who are more reactive than rational in taking up the cause against the misnomered and abstract “anti-Semitism” can present a concrete definition of the chimera against which they imagine themselves to be arrayed, their basic intelligence, academic objectivity and ethical integrity must be subject to close scrutiny. At very least they are surely naïve souls who are mere uncomprehending tools in a political strategy which transcends their understanding.

    Arlene Johnson

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      Thank you for that erudite enlightenment ! The Corbyn Conspiracy is a good example of a judaic political opposition SOP tactic meant to make losers of his supporters .

      [ Pacifism ] is a nonstarter in political contests .

      The answer to the often posed question __

      ” What would happen if ((( they ))) had a war and no one showed-up for it ? ”


      ” Every one would lose [ by default ] except ((( them ))) “.

  4. Angelicus
    Angelicus says:

    The article is very good but the fact remains that Jeremy Corbyn is another corrupt politician, a member of the Establishment who plays his role as leader of the controlled “opposition”. Corbyn has repeatedly condemned (and quite rightly so) the criminal state of Israel like most left-wing politicians do, that is all. He NEVER said a word about the destruction of the British people and its cultural traditions through forced immigration and multiculturalism. Moreover, he NEVER said a word about the criminal role played by the Jews in British society and history.

    Jeremy Corbyn’s antisemitism is as real as Tony Blair’s patriotism. If he was “the real Mc Coy” he would not be the leader of the Labour Party. He is just playing his role as “the villain” in today’s play. The only thing real about him is his Marxist beliefs, and that is very bad indeed.

    The last decent British patriotic leader was the late John Tyndall from the old BNP. The fact that his movement failed completely was due to the imbecility and cowardice of the majority of the British people who would never support a “racist” movement. God forbid! What would the neighbours say?

    • Eric
      Eric says:

      Too bad Nick Griffin isn’t Prime Minister. In the final analysis, whites only have themselves to blame. You can’t get more than 5% of them to not freak out when you name the Jew. It goes beyond indoctrination. It’s hard-wired into them.

      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        Nonjewish Whites
        ( the vast majority are christians — protestant / catholic )
        are only half-to-blame for naively//unwittingly allowing themselves , over the ages , to be hard-wired , with surgical precision , into shabbos goy idiocy by their indisputable jewmasters .

      • Angelicus
        Angelicus says:

        You are right. It is also my belief that most whites are despicable cowards who do not care about their race or their countries. Unfortunately, people who care, like us, must pay for their treacherous behaviour.

        The root of all our problems is the 75 years of endless indoctrination since 1945.

      • pete
        pete says:

        “Too bad Nick Griffin isn’t Prime Minister.”

        You clearly do not know, or have met Nick Griffin. Griffin destroyed the BNP, just like he helped to destroy the National Front in the 1980’s. I have personally known Griffin since the 1970’s, and his dad Edgar.

        His determination to bring into the BNP, jews,,blacks, and asians should have set off ‘alarm bells’ with international nationalist circles. But clearly not ?

        His main occupation when leader of the BNP was to get himself to the centre of where the finance was.

        • Eric
          Eric says:

          pete: Griffin’s speech to the European Parliament — in which he condemned flooding Europe with non-whites and named the Jews as being the sponsors of white genocide — is not consistent with what you say about him.

          I would believe Griffin before I would believe you.

          • pete
            pete says:


            and that right there shows why nationalists are even worse than moribund in the UK. Even comatose would be overstating the case. I have been involved since 1976, and this period is the worst state I have ever seen us. Far worse than even the poor 1980s.

            There is now no political vehicle/party in the UK to express our views. That all went with the death of John Tyndall. Nothing has been built since his death.

            Regarding Griffin himself, even it seems articulate nationalists such as on this forum can’t be bothered, to ‘do their homework’ on his history. Which should be a prerequisite before offering opinions.

            Please by all means follow the charlatan. But you have been warned. And to base your ‘trust’ on just one public speech by any ‘politician’, is naive in the extreme. Just give him your money, that’s what he loves best.

            You will have great difficulty in finding anyone who actually knows him, to provide a character reference.

            If you want to see Griffin ‘in action’, then view the debacle he caused on BBC QUESTION TIME in 2009. That effectively signalled the end of John Tyndall’s British National Party.

            Where is the BNP now? And the National Front in the 1980’s? Just a mere coincidence that Griffin was leading both when they both collapsed?

      • brengun torrent
        brengun torrent says:

        Nick Griffin was bad for the BNP, and drove it down. I was once a member, until 2008. I don’t care a damn about anti-semitism, Jews or anyone else. I will vote for anyone who is a true Nationalist and puts the welfare of British whites first. If Griffin really cared for Britain, he would have stood down in 2008, while we were riding high, but he didn’t and the rest is history. At 59 I’ve not many years to go, but my conscience is clear. I’ve never voted for the LIB, LAB, CON.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      I often wondered what the “neighbours” actually did say (or “do”) about John Tyndall, who started political life in “Nazi” uniform “storming the red platform”, and ended up living in the Hove-Brighton area with its high proportion of Jewish (and homosexual) residents.

      The chief anxiety among dominant members of the Jewish community in Britain is that a Corbyn government could disrupt the hitherto close cordial relationships that previous Prime Ministers – Wilson, Thatcher, Blair and May – have maintained with Israel. There is a view among modern “leftists” that the Palestinians are among the various victims of western colonialism, and ipso facto deserve support. But is of course ridiculous to describe Corbyn and his gang as “racists” in view of their past and present position on non-white immigration and “hate crimes”. Their comradeship with Hamas is no better or worse than their positive view of the IRA and suchlike. A neo-Marxist regime in Britain with McDonnell, Milne and Abbott in the Cabinet would be a disaster, the worst of all the bad options. There is no other “national homeland” to which I could run, or wish to runaway, other than the England where I live.

      It is no great asset to serious argument, however, to draw attention to minor deficiencies in physical beauty of a few of the so-called “Zios” (though don’t forget the Gentile Baron “Piggy” Pickles, “UK Special Envoy for Post-Holocaust Issues”). What about a photo of (hot) TV presenter Rachel Riley, or even her (more lukewarm) luvvie friend Tracy-Ann Oberman, among the anti-Corbyn lobbyists?

      According to “The Mail on Sunday”, November 17, Tracy-Ann’s great-grandfather Isaac Donoff fought alongside Trotsky, and the family later fought Mosley’s “hated Blackshirts”, in Cable Street, with 14-year old Fay “flinging marbles under the fascists’ jackboots from the window of their tenement flat”. In fact, the only “battle” in that street and its immediate environ was between Jewish Communists and the policemen who were trying to clear illegal barricades; the marbles were usually used by red rioters to unsettle police horses.

      “The fight goes on,” writes Chief Reporter Ian Gallagher. “Meanwhile, Tracy-Ann’s career flourishes. She is working on a retelling of Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice set on Cable Street in the 1930s and will play Shylock, the Jewish moneylender, as a matriarch based on her redoubtable great-grandmother, Annie. Who else?” (Who else, indeed.)

      Hopefully someone eventually will document a complete account of the Corbyn/Zionism controversy, with all its paranoia. Meanwhile, I suggest for starters: Karl Sabbagh, The Antisemitism Wars: How the British media failed their public” (2018).

      • Angelicus
        Angelicus says:

        I think you are right about Griffin. I am not English, therefore I did not have the opportunity to join the BNP and get to know its leaders but I used to follow and read the excellent articles published by John Tyndall and his collaborators in “Spearhead”.

        The impression I have got from John Tyndall’s life-long political activism is a very good one. I think he was a fine leader and a sincere patriot. It was not his fault that most of the British turned out to be politically correct morons who took (and take) their cue from the MSM.

        There has been a nasty remark by David Ashton about John Tyndall’s taste for what he calls “Nazi” uniform (by the way what a typically Jewish-Marxist way to refer to a National-Socialist) and the fact that he ended up living in an area with a high population of Jews and homosexuals. A) John Tyndall was an admirer of Adolf Hitler and it was quite logical that in his early years he (like many other men of his generation) favoured wearing brown shirts and jackboots, not a wise thing to do but nobody is perfect. B) Tyndall ended up living where he could, I am sure he would have chosen a different place had he been able to do so. That was a very spiteful and obnoxious comment.

        • David Ashton
          David Ashton says:

          I put “Nazi” in inverted commas not because I am a “typical Jewish Marxist” but because the uniform was not entirely like that of the SA; e.g. it used a Celtic Cross armband but not the “Swastika” (though the ludicrous “World Union of National Socialists” used a variant), though nevertheless needlessly juvenile, pretentious and counter-productive. I subscribed in younger days to both “Combat” and “Spearhead”. True, Tyndall was Hitler fan and tried to translate National Socialism for Britain and the former Dominions, and in later years developed a maturity in speaking style modelled on Mosley. I don’t think the reason why JT never became the Leader of Britain was because most British people are morons.

          Once again, I am not Jewish by ancestry, religion, affiliation, typical or atypical; nor – contrary to a previous smear on TOO – have I ever received any payment from Jews. I have however been a lifelong active political opponent of Marxism, details on request. I know the relatively well-to-do area where Tyndall lived and wondered how he eventually led a relatively charmed life, but then so did William Pierce. Nasty? Spiteful? Obnoxious? Such sensitivities would be more appropriate in describing the petty feuds among the anti-immigration nationalists that undermined the patriotic resistance.

          • pete
            pete says:

            John Tyndall lived in Hove, – Westbourne Villas to be precise. He only came into some money due to his wife Valerie being left a bequest from her father Charles Parker.

          • Angelicus
            Angelicus says:

            Hello David: I did not suggest that you are Jewish or Marxist, it is obvious that you are neither of those, I just found of a very poor taste the use of a derogatory term coined by the Marxists when you could have used National Socialist. I do agree that after 1945 the wearing of uniforms was silly and counter-productive, but when we are young things seem very different and we tend to do very foolish things.

            I still maintain that the comment about Tyndall living in an area heavily populated by Jews and homosexuals was spiteful because it obviously was not his choice and he could not do anything about it. So, what was the point of it?

            The fact that the BNP did not prosper, besides Tyndall’s possible mistakes, was due to the imbecility of the majority of the British people who would not support a movement that is “racist” and “non-respectable” and this tragic, unforgivable flaw is not exclusively British it affects the whole of the white race. It is the post-1945 middle-class mind-set.

            That is the consequence of 75 years of Jewish brainwashing. There is no other explanation. Still, people should know better.

            Tyndall may have had his flaws, like everyone, and must have made some wrong decisions but he was an honest and brave patriot who dedicated his whole life to his country and his race, He deserves our respect. I am glad that he was spared the indignities of jail and public humiliation by his untimely death.

        • David Ashton
          David Ashton says:

          A correction to my post on Tyndall’s “brown shirt and jackboot” garb (not shared by “many” in post-war GB): the little “party” led by him and Colin Jordan used a Sunwheel armband (the Celtic Cross without protruding arms) in their pantomimes beyond reach of the Public Order Act prohibition of political uniforms.

    • Carolyn Yeager
      Carolyn Yeager says:

      “The fact that [John Tyndall’s] movement failed completely was due to the imbecility and cowardice of the majority of the British people who would never support a “racist” movement.”


      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        Tyndall in league with Jordan, then on and off with Webster and Bean and Rockwell and Fountaine and Kerr-Ritchie, made a problematic entry onto the British scene, with e.g. a battle-van declaring “Hitler was Right!” and literature such as “The Authoritarian State” (a plagiarised mix of the Protocols of Zion and Mosley’s pre-war policy), the only practical result of which was to reinforce pressure from Jewish organizations to introduce anti-racism legislation. He matured later, but the albatross remained. The National Front gathered some public support, but was scuppered by Thatcher’s anti-immigration pose.

  5. pete
    pete says:

    Describing Corbyn accurately one has to pinpoint the fact he is not anti- jewish at all. Rather a lot of jews still support ‘Jezza’ . But what he is is anti-zionist. Rather a lot of jews are also anti-zionist, especially their religious groups.

    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      An anti-zionist jew is one whom cannot reasonably be told , by anyone who believes everyone should have a homeland , to ” go live in Israel if you do not like our nonjewish culture here “.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      The chief concern is not that Corbyn will nationalise the banks or send anyone to the gas-chamber, but that he will close down military co-operation with Israel, and possibly uncover previous hitherto unpublicised commitments.

      Anti-Zionists are attacked as anti-Semites – whether rightly or wrongly.

      Corbyn’s “Epshtine” solecism, however, draws attention to indications that Mossad may have been involved in girl-trafficking potentially to compromise influential people just as the KGB used the “honey pot” on gullible visitors. His stalinoid comrade Seumas Milne had an article on Mossad “swallows” in Africa in “The Guardian”, February 24, 2015.

      Google thoroughly: Robert & Ghislaine Maxwell & Mossad; Leslie Wexner & Mega Group; Ari Ben-Menashe & David Robert Steele; Carbyne911 & Ehud Barak.

      Incidentally, Barak has been asked, so far in vain, by supporters of Bibi “Judea is our homeland” Netanyahu, accused like his predecessor Ehud Olmert of corruption, to account for his $2.3 million “research” payment from the Wexner Foundation. Barak was the prime mover with Tony Blair and Goren Persson in establishing the perennial Holocaust Day.

  6. Tedesco
    Tedesco says:

    Great article by Tobias Langdon. I like some of his expressions – porcine punim, smirk makes free, the Bubbe Barometer, Jewish Corbynophobia

    Langdon is right about Tony Blair – bad for the British people, but great for the Jews. He cites some examples. The same for Angela Merkel. Both have been publicly honored by the World Jewish Congress and other such groups. They care only for the Jews – to the detriment of their own people. Blair and Merkel are shameless traitors.

    Jeremy Corbyn is not anti-Jewish. He is anti-Israel. The two are quite different. He supports the Arabs against Israel, but that does not make him anti-Jewish. He doesn’t support the British people at all, but that’s not good enough for the Jewish Community. They demand total subservience, in the manner of Tony Blair.

    [mod. note: credit where it’s due — “bubbe barometer” is Stephen Daisley’s coinage.]

  7. r1b1
    r1b1 says:

    The whole Corbyn / Labour anti-Semitism[*] _schtick_ reeks of being a Zog and Phoney show, to big up even further the shock and awe in the Goyim for whose exclusive detriment it is staged.
    What about the Labour Friends of Israel (like the Conservative etc etc Friends of Israel…)? That doesn’t sound very “‘anti-Semitic”.
    Plus, don’t forget strawman-Corbyn is himself a mamzer or some such:
    And last, not to forget his association with the IRA:
    The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit is alive and well in that one. The Nossig just-a-drop gains credence again.

    [*] anti-Semitism: a smear word calculated to shut down bona fide political discourse under the false pretense of a claim to semi-universalism, whilst being in actuality for the sole benefit of organized Jewry, whilst further keeping the word “Jew” out of the public narrative.

  8. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    Jews created a monster they can’t control. I guess guilt plagued and brainwashed goyim didn’t get the memo that you’re only supposed to go as far left as is beneficial to jews. I wonder how long it will take jews to learn the fact that you can’t stuff genies back in bottles.

  9. Wael Ahmad
    Wael Ahmad says:

    Tobias Langdon is hypocrite and coward.
    His hypocrisy is clear when he criticizes few Jewish minor authors in the British prestitutes & propaganda journals, few minor politicians in parliaments, ex war criminal Blair, for their attacks on Corbyn and pro=Jewish interests attitudes, but he demonizes the whole of Muslim migrants and refugees for all the rapes and crimes that they inflicts on his white working class. He never mention that those Muslims and Arabs are the victims of the British and Jewish criminal wars and destruction of the middle east since the creation of the bastard state of Israel till present. And he’s coward because he doesn’t dare to point out at the real criminal Jews who control British politicians and policies, the City wit it’s Jewish bankers and financial criminals, the Rothschild’s gangsters, who are the real cause of all the decline and misfortunes, not only in Britain, but all over the world, those are the real war criminals, who forced millions of Muslims against their will to flee their destroyed countries, not because they like to live in Britain or Germany.
    The Jews are your existential threat, not the Muslims or Arabs, the Jews hates you because you are Christians, they want to either enslave you or exterminate you if you refuse, read their bible and Talmud.

    [mod. note: when commenting on articles at TOO, it’s helpful to read them first. The article does not say that Muslims or Arabs are the main problem. It calls Blair a war-criminal who “lied the UK into a disastrous war in Iraq that killed huge numbers of innocent people.” It also says that “Blair obeyed Jews and killed Arabs.” So perhaps you should read the article and try commenting again?]

    • Fenria
      Fenria says:

      Oh come off it. You’re not going to convince anyone here that muslim immigrants hopped over multiple safe nations to reach the high benefits payout nations of western and northern Europe because they’re running scared from war and had no other choice. I agree that Britain has helped to make a total chaotic and unsustainable mess out of most of the middle east over the centuries, but suggesting that today’s muslim immigrants are some poor waifs tossed about onto the European dole for life by the rough seas of cruel circumstance is a bridge too far. You can go spin that yarn over at some MSM page. Here at TOO, we know economic opportunists when we see them.

      • Angelicus
        Angelicus says:

        Well said Fenria. This man (Wael Ahmad) did not read properly the article or is too thick to understand it. Langdon NEVER attacked Arab or Muslim immigrants. The only problem with the Arabs is that they SHOULD NOT be in the UK or Europe. They will NEVER assimilate and do not have anything in common with us. They have their own countries and they should sort themselves out. I sympathize with their plight as victims (like us) of international Jewry but those hateful fanatics (and they are thousands) pushing for Sharia law and Muslim supremacy make things very difficult.

        The main point is the Muslims ARE NOT our enemies, this is a conflict created by the Jews. If we were free from Jewish control we could, and should, establish good relations with the Arab nations.

  10. Rob Bottom
    Rob Bottom says:

    That anti-Corbyn article with the line:

    >Because, by any objective analysis of contemporary British antisemitism, Mr Corbyn must be seen as the instigator.

    Truly amazing stuff. These people have no shame.

  11. Edward Harris
    Edward Harris says:

    Was it Charles Lynton who was fined 50 GBP for being buggered in a London Public Lavatory or was it really Anthony Charles Lynton Blair?
    In his expensive school the headmaster always behaved towards Miranda, sorry, Tony , in an upright manner, so how did Tony end up with the perverts and crooks in the House of Commons?
    I once heard somene say something good about ACLB!
    The comedian said “Why does Tony Blair have such an ugly wife? It was good of him to feel sorry for her but he didn’t have to marry her.”
    The people TOO refers to as Jews are not related to the biblical Jews.
    They are descended from East Europeans who were converted to the Jewish faith in the Middle Ages.
    I am part descended from Sephardi rabbis who detested these converts.
    I always call them converts.

    • David Ashton
      David Ashton says:

      I have noticed that homosexually inclined or very “feminine” men have rather masculine-looking female wives. Just saying.

      But for more on Blair, see the e.g. biographies by two writers of Jewish background, Tom Bower (especially on the immigration conspiracy) and Leo Abse (homosexual). The Jewish TV commentator Robert Peston’s “Who Runs Britain?” will tell you something about Phony Tony’s pal Lord “Cashpoint” Levy.

    • r1b1
      r1b1 says:

      MOURANT: The Genetics of the Jews (1978), Chapter 10:

      “The general conclusion to be drawn from the blood-group data is that the Ashkenazim are essentially a single population, largely, if not mainly, of Palestinian Jewish descent. The strongest evidence is their systematic resemblance to the Sephardim, whose Palestinian ancestry is more firmly established by historical records. As already stated, these two major groups of Jews differ distinctly with respect to each main blood-group system, but the difference for any one system is never very great. This is what one would expect for two populations of common origin but separated for not much more than a thousand years. The incorporation of a Khazar component in the Ashkenazim cannot, however, be ruled out completely.”

      Someone tell me will you if their blood has changed and the analysis now differs a mere 40 years on…. Boas-style?

      As for the Biblical “Hebrews” or cut-throats from over the river, Ben Klassen did a good analysis of their nasty story book, its unpleasant cast of characters and their sordid deeds (daughter/s being impregnated by father, Angels being saved from homosexual rape by housekeeper offering the mob his virgin daughters, whoremongering, incest, the lot). Our childhood’s pattern don’t you know. Of course it does explain somewhat why the Bible in English itself was banned for quite a long time.

      • David Ashton
        David Ashton says:

        There are a host of modern genotype studies of modern Jewish populations.
        The main basic differences in phenotype between majority Ashkenazim and minority Sephardim as defined by H F K Guenther and J R Baker remain valid, but the two populations exhibit some intermixture with one another and also non-Jews.

  12. Brooklyn Dave
    Brooklyn Dave says:

    I love the expression gobsmacked as well as the slightly more vulgar one gobshyte (a bs artist). Porcine punims —
    there is an overabundance of them here in New York – and you don’t have to be a member of the tribe.

  13. Thomas
    Thomas says:

    Hi everyone.I know this is off topic but I want to warn people .In the last 6 weeks Ive been arrested twice and held each time for 12 hours before being questioned in a London police station..First arrest was for sending an email 8 months ago to the US embassy taking the piss out of their gun laws and stating that the US was a tool of Zionism.Lap top was confiscated and not returned.Second was 10 days ago for sending email to an unnamed Guardian Journalist 6 months ago asking her if shed earned her PHD by lying on her back and being a Rothschild stooge.Smartphone confiscated.Released both times “Under Investigation”.

    • Angelicus
      Angelicus says:

      Hello Thomas. I hope you have learned your lesson. Sending the e-mail to the US embassy was a very stupid thing to do. You should know how paranoid they are about any criticism of Israel. Don’t ever do that again. On the other hand, the fact that they confiscated your laptop is very serious. I hope they will not bother you again. Good luck!

      • Thomas
        Thomas says:

        Yes, Angelicus, I have learnt my lesson and it’s that only bravery and self-sacrifice on our part can stop these evil hypocrites. I will not be silenced by these evil people.

        • Angelicus
          Angelicus says:

          Hello Thomas. You are right, we must not give up the fight but we must choose carefully our battles. The enemy is in an extraordinarily powerful position and charging like a bull will only end in a bloody defeat. Courage without cunning is useless. Good luck.

  14. Censored
    Censored says:

    If Jeremy Corbyn is as “Nazi”/“antisemitic” as the opposition to the jewish supremacist mafia becomes in the imminent years and decades, they shall be very lucky indeed!

    Keep whining jews, perhaps the Whites you have ruthlessly sought to destroy will pity you when they learn of your crimes and transgressions/trespasses against them… then again, maybe they won’t!

      • Flo
        Flo says:

        Have you heard about the latest vintage? Jeremy Corbyn has just cagily reaffirmed his antisemitism by pronouncing Jeffrey Epstein’s name “epp-shteen” in order to make him seem “more Jewish.” Oy vey.

  15. David Ashton
    David Ashton says:

    Latest from the Asylum:

    1. “We were alarmed to read, yet again, a list of evidence-free accusations charging Jeremy Corbyn with antisemitism…unsubstantiated allegations in pages of newsprint and hours of broadcasting, while the countervailing evidence that has been collected by highly reputable researchers, many of them Jewish, is entirely disregarded.” – Antony Lerman and 14 other Jews, “most of whom have family in Israel…”, The Guardian, November 18, 2019.

    2. “Corbyn was slammed yesterday for saying everyone in Britain should be allowed to bring over relatives from around the world to join them… [He] has been forced to deny supporting a Labour MP’s plan to offer grants to black Brits to resettle In Africa and the Caribbean…a controversial 1993 proposal”, Sun, November 18, 2019.

  16. Sutter
    Sutter says:

    I’ve always held that one of the best strategies to take on Jews is to pressure them to just stop being Jewish. I mean, what does it even mean to be Jewish? Jews don’t believe in their own religion, after all. It is not a religion. Jews also do not really believe in racial purity anymore, not too much. If anything, it is something of a clan.

    As Philip Roth said, Jews have “no body of law, no body of learning and no language, and finally, no Lord – which seems to me a significant thing to be missing.” He said Jews instead are raised with “a psychology, not a not a culture and not a culture in its totality. What one received whole, however, what one feels whole, is a kind of psychology; and this psychology can be translated into three words – ‘Jews are better.’ This is what I knew from the beginning, somehow Jews were better.”

    So, for heavens’ sake, STOP!! Stop it, Jews! Stop with this triumphalist, supreme-ist, anti-western grudge-clan! This kind of vindictive, chauvinistic culture has no place in a decent world.

  17. T.Gilligan
    T.Gilligan says:

    I certainly won’t be voting for the Labour in a few weeks, and I don’t expect to have a credible selection of candidates that reflect my views; but I will definitetly not cast a vote for the extreme left, ‘Liberal Democrats’ (two oxymorons for a name!); Greens- Eco-open-border socialists ( what’s green about that?!).
    Meanwhile, in London there have been 3 murders in 24 hours, and the London murder tally is a ten-year high and the entire ostrich media speaks in euphemisms, as in ‘Youth’ violence and refuse to accept that the 2nd (2nd generation for Africans) and 3rd generation of Afro-Carribeans have any link to the exponential increase in the murder. Thus it will continue upwards as they to scared to state the bleedin obvious.

    In tandem with this is the constant barrage of anti-English, anti-indigenous British print and television broadcast-media. Recent examples are the Evening Standard financial section from Friday 22 Nov. with the headline, “Tech under fire for failure to hire black employees” by Mark Shapland, who adds ‘The problem is made worse by the fact many of the companies are based in Shoreditch, Boston, and Stratford, where traditionally that have been large black populations in London’. (?)!
    I was catching up with the Financial Times review section from 28 September, Life and Arts where David Feldman dissects three ‘challenging’ books. One book by Bari Weiss, How to Fight Anti-Semitism’ reviewer Feldman disagrees with Weiss when she states “It is dangerous to be a Jew in Europe”. Feldman says, I quote, ‘In fact, so far as we can tell, most anti-Semitism in Britain stem from white men who are nominally Christian”. In the London this weekend a black man with charged with quoting ‘anti-semitic’ verse from the Bible.
    In these Northern East European Isles we are cease to be Welsh Irish Scottish English. We are reduced to a colour whose presence in the workplace and society is an indicator of structural and institutionalised oppression.
    I will vote for the least racist, least anti-WISE political force that exists.

Comments are closed.