Facial, Racial, Spatial: How Human Faces and Brains Have Taken Different Routes through Race-Space

Eyes, nose, mouth, chin, cheeks, brows — all of those words are home-grown English. But when you put them together and view them as a whole, they turn French in the word “face.” That doesn’t happen in German, where home-grown Augen, Nase, Mund, Kinn, Wangen, Brauen come together as home-grown Gesicht.

Faces, Races, Spaces

German is less of a hybrid language than English and I’d like to know how that affects the psychology of native speakers. The geometry of the two languages became much more different after the Norman Conquest and that must affect the way that minds move through them. If languages had faces, the German and English languages would look much less alike than the German and English peoples. I mean the real peoples: the white Germans and the White English. I’m a racist, which means I’m also a “facist” (i.e., face-ist). I think race is a biological reality with enormous — indeed, decisive — consequences for culture and civilization. And races are inescapably connected with faces. Evolution in different physical and cultural environments has sculpted faces in different ways just as it’s sculpted every other part of the human body, from the bones to the brain.

Composite faces of male athletes from different European nations, including Germany and the UK (from Dienekes Anthropology blog)

The outcomes of those different evolutionary paths are just much more obvious in the face, which is, after all, the most obvious part of the human body. That’s why so much of our brains is devoted to reading other people’s faces (and to controlling our own). Our intense interest in faces arises from the important information that they carry. Not that leftists like us to see some of that information. They hate the way we can tell Swedes from Somalis from Samoans at a glance. Sadly for leftists, it’s clear that facial is racial is spatial, because races and their faces have evolved in different places and taken different routes through genetic space. That affects more than the geometry of faces. The color of faces has important information too, both in subtle ways, like the intra-racial differences in the face-colors of men and women studied by the maverick anthropologist Peter Frost, and in gross ways, like the inter-racial differences in the skin-color of Blacks and Whites. When we look at a face we’re looking not just at geometry — the shapes and relative sizes of noses and mouths and eyes — but also at chemistry (which is geometry at a microscopic scale). The color of hair, skin and eyes says something about the chemistry of the body. You could say that a human face is like the cover of a book. It gives you imperfect but important information about the contents of the skull: the geometry and chemistry of the brain, and hence the psychology and cognition of the face’s owner.

The leftist miracle of an unbreakable brain-barrier

That’s why facism is an essential part of racism: the differences between the faces of different races convey real and important biological data. But leftism denies the significance of faces just as it denies the existence of races. Leftists can’t deny that evolution has sculpted faces, but they do deny that evolution has sculpted the brains that lie directly behind those faces. Or rather, they say that the same evolutionary forces that made the faces of Swedes, Somalis and Samoans so different were somehow prevented from working on the brains that lay directly behind those faces. After Homo sapiens evolved in Africa, the skull became an absolute and unbreakable barrier, sealing the brain off from all further evolution as Homo sapiens migrated into environments as different as the tropical, ocean-kissed islands of Tahiti and the icy, oxygen-starved plateau of Tibet. Bodies changed, but brains didn’t. That’s why the Psychic Unity of Mankind is a central axiom of leftism. According to leftists, the brains of all humans, Blacks and Whites, men and women, Finns and Fijians, are capable of exactly the same high intellectual endeavor. We have exactly the same cerebral hardware and we run exactly the same psychological software. Only racism and sexism can explain why Black women have never won Nobel Prizes for Physics or Field Medals in mathematics. Racism and sexism are also shamefully and solely responsible for the myth that White women are more attractive and more feminine than Black women.

Leftism says that Black-Jewish Afua Hirsch is just as beautiful as all-White Aphrodite

Well, that’s what leftism says, but leftism is a lie. Our faces are different and so are both our brains and our beauties. If we’d evolved to read the geometry of internal organs as easily as the geometry of external faces, we’d be able to distinguish between the brains of Blacks and Whites at a glance. And not just the brains but everything else in the body, from the liver to the lungs. To the dismay of leftists, artificial intelligence (AI) can now do exactly that: it can assign internal organs to different races with very high accuracy. As I described in “Biology is Blasphemy,” leftist scientists have been “shocked, confused, and frankly horrified” to discover that AI can read the reality of race in X-rays and other medical images. As one researcher despairingly concluded: “There is no easy way to remove racial information from images. It is everywhere and it is in everything.”

Ugly, asymmetrical and alien

But why would we want to “remove racial information from images”? Well, I don’t and I hope that you don’t, but lying leftists do, because they want to deny reality in pursuit of what really matters to them: power and the chance to scapegoat non-leftist Whites for the failure and criminality of Blacks. Take this photo of ten vibrant faces that recently appeared in the British media:

The ugly, asymmetrical and alien faces of a violent armed gang in racially and facially enriched Britain — the White-looking criminal is called Ihab Ashaqui

The faces are ugly, asymmetrical and alien (ugliness and asymmetry go together, in fact). If they were the covers of books, then the books would be in the genre of true crime. And they’d be autobiographies, because the faces are those of a violent armed gang who “used guns, knives, hammers and crowbars to terrorise [their victims] before fleeing in a fleet of stolen vehicles.” Leftists would say that the men are completely British and that they’ve been turned into violent criminals by living in a White-supremacist society that refused to nurture their innate intelligence, civility and potential for high achievement. I say: “Face the facts and see the facts in the faces.” And the facts are that both the faces and the brains behind the faces have followed very different evolutionary paths to those of the genuine White British. Nine of the ten men are obviously Black and Blacks haven’t been through the process of genetic pacification, whereby strong and stable states have weeded out genes for crime and violence in their subjects by executing and imprisoning violent and lawless men over many centuries. On the contrary, Blacks have evolved in environments where violence and selfish, impulsive behavior are advantageous.

An Albanian face in an otherwise Black gang: the torturers, rapists and murderers of White schoolgirl Mary-Ann Leneghan

The one White face in the gang isn’t the product of genetic pacification either. The White-looking thug is called Ihab Ashaqui, which may well be a misspelt Albanian name. Like mountainous Chechnya — which produced the Boston Bombers for America, a head-chopping young art-critic for France, and the most furious fighters of Islamic State — and mountainous Georgia — which produced the Machiavellian mass-murderer Josef Stalin, mountainous Albania has bred men who would rather feud and fight rather than obey laws. And so Albanians behave more like non-British Blacks than British Whites. That may be why Ihab Ashaqui appears in an otherwise Black gang just as Indrit Krasniqi, another Albanian, appeared in the Black gang that raped, tortured and murdered the White schoolgirl Mary-Ann Leneghan in 2005. Unlike the murdered Black and now-sainted schoolboy Stephen Lawrence, she has long been forgotten by the leftist media. After all, her death revealed the truth of how dangerous Blacks are to Whites, whereas the death of Stephen Lawrence can be used to promote the lie that Whites are dangerous to Blacks. Leftism hates truth and loves lies.

Jewish faces in the highest of places

And leftist lies killed Mary-Ann Leneghan, because she spent her short life saturated in pro-Black propaganda designed to persuade her that Blacks were cool and fascinating and perfectly suitable for White girls like her to be friends with. That’s how she ended up raped and tortured for hours, then stabbed to death in a park as she pleaded desperately for her life. By any objective standard, her murder was far worse than the murder of Stephen Lawrence. And it involved misogyny and patriarchy at its most brutal and femicidal. But leftists don’t apply objective standards and they don’t genuinely care about misogyny, patriarchy and femicide. They apply the standard of “What advances the cause of leftism and helps leftists like me gain more power?”

Bland Biden, bland Blair, unthreatening goyish frontmen for a hostile Jewish elite

Jewish faces in the highest of places: How Jews are in charge of the so-called Biden administration

Merrick Garland, chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, is a former prosecutor who’s viewed as a moderate.

The sly and sinister Jew Merrick Garland, anti-White American Attorney-General

But it’s because leftists love power that they’re careful about the faces that front their parties. Like the Blair government in Britain, the Biden government in America is disproportionately staffed by Jews, particularly at the highest levels, and follows an anti-White Jewish agenda of open borders and plutocratic enrichment. But in both cases the Jews who ended up running things chose a bland and unthreatening goy to front their election campaign. After all, if the sinister Jew Merrick Garland had been the Democratic candidate for POTUS, even the dumbest goyim might have felt a chill down their spines and understood that voting Democrat was not in their best interests.

Three Jewish faces, three Jewish fraudsters: Bernie Maddoff, Sam Bankman-Fried of FTX, Caroline Ellison of FTX

Another Jewish face, another Jewish fraudster: the anti-White, anti-Christian Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky laundering money through FTX

And how do I know that Merrick Garland is sinister? Well, it’s there in his face. If that punim were the cover of a book, the book would be a torture manual or a grimoire of Black Magic. This is me being facist again: the faces of Jews often give me the creeps. And I’m not unique in that. In Western culture there’s a long and shameful history of Jews being represented as or likened to vampires, ghouls and other evil creatures — see Andrew Joyce’s “On Jews and Vampires.”

Cannibals, vampires and Princes of Darkness

At least, leftists and Jews call it a “shameful” history. As both a facist and a racist, I’d call it a healthy and appropriate response to the alien and predatory nature of Jews, which is plainly visible in their faces and body language — and also audible in their voices. In America, the bloodthirsty Jewish neo-con Richard Perle is nicknamed “the Prince of Darkness.” By no coincidence, the Machiavellian Jew Peter Mandelson received the same nickname in Britain (Mandelson was one of the hostile Jewish elite who pulled Blair’s strings). Elsewhere in Britain, the Jewish politician Gerald Kaufman was nicknamed “Hannibal Lecter” (after the cannibal serial-killer created by the writer Thomas Harris). And the Jewish politician Michael Howard, who headed the so-called Conservative party and failed to beat the bland and unthreatening goy Tony Blair at the 2005 election, was nicknamed “Dracula.” One of his own shadow-ministers, Ann Widdecombe, said of Howard that “there is something of the night about him.”

The ugly, evil and truth-hating Jew Jonathan Greenblatt, head of the anti-White ADL

Again, I think this is a healthy and appropriate gentile response to the alien and predatory nature of Jews. But healthy and appropriate racial responses are abhorred and abominated by media and business in the modern leftist West. Kanye West, the Black American musician, has learned that very strongly in recent months, as Andrew Joyce explained at the Occidental Observer in “Jewish Troubles with Uppity Rappers.” West is very intelligent and articulate by Black standards, and he’s very courageous by White standards, because he’s said things that no White of remotely comparable status has dared to say. The ugly and sinister Jew Jonathan Greenblatt, head of the totalitarian Anti-Defamation League (ADL), says that Kanye needs to be crushed because he’s accused Jews of having the power to crush their critics. The ADL is pro-LGBT and anti-BTG — against Beauty, Truth and Goodness. It’s no coincidence that Greenblatt is ugly, evil and a liar. As the great Catholic writer Hilaire Belloc said long ago in The Great Heresies (1938): “[T]here is (as the greatest of the ancient Greeks discovered) a certain indissoluble Trinity of Truth, Beauty and Goodness. You cannot deny or attack one of these three without at the same time denying or attacking both the others.”

The ugly, evil and truth-hating faces of American antifa

You can see Belloc’s words brought to life in Jonathan Greenblatt and in the ugly, evil and truth-hating faces of American antifa. But the converse of his words also applies: to promote any one of that “indissoluble Trinity” is to promote the two others. It’s also no coincidence that Whites have evolved the brightest and most beautiful faces, created the best art and the least corrupt and criminal societies, and pursued truth so successfully in science and mathematics. Faces are themselves works of art, sculpted down the millennia by the aesthetic choices and preferences of men and women competing for mates.

The specialness of European female beauty

But the anthropologist Peter Frost argues that male choices were particularly important in Europe, where women competed more intensely for fewer men in a much harsher and colder environment than that of tropical Africa. That’s why the color of women’s hair and eyes is most varied in Europe: women benefited by standing out from their rivals in the competition for mates in an individualist mating system in which personal preferences rather than family strategizing was paramount. Indeed, Frost says that “eye colors … have diversified only in Europeans and more so in women than in men. Specifically, the range of eye colors is more evenly distributed among women: they have the less frequent colors more often and the more frequent ones less often.” The eyes are windows to the soul, so it’s said. They’re certainly a window into evolution and the gem-like eyes — sapphires, emeralds and more — of European women are the result of a distinct and uniquely beautiful evolutionary path. But what have Jews, whose faces and brains are the product of a different evolutionary path, done with the beauty of European women? They’ve turned it into the drug and dross of pornography. The vast majority of the alien-faced young men migrating into Europe have undoubtedly seen White women in Jewish pornography and had their rape-culture strengthened and stimulated by it.

Facial (and racial) propaganda from the anti-White, pro-migrant Guardian

Again, leftists don’t care. Their pro-migrant propaganda studiously ignores the predominance of rape-inclined young men and pretends again and again that non-White migrants are helpless women and children. We often see crying women and children in the pro-migrant leftist media. It’s facial propaganda that’s also racial propaganda, exploiting our instinctive sympathy for distressed human faces to promote the invasion of White nations by hostile and dangerous outsiders. Facism is always racism, whether it’s the healthy, truthful facism that helps Whites by recognizing that non-White faces go with non-White brains, or the unhealthy, lying facism that harms Whites by pretending that non-White faces go with brains that are just like ours. No, they’re not like ours and they don’t fit in White societies. The faces of different races belong in different spaces.