Featured Articles

Staircase History and the Subprime Morality of the Nanking Massacre

/74 Comments/in /by
nanjing massacre

The Great Nanjing Massacre, by Zi Jian Li, 1992

The French have a term for it, L’esprit de l’escalier, or “staircase wit.” It means bright and witty sayings thought of too late as one is exiting a party. But history has its own “staircase” element as well, namely events that receive historical attention much later than they should if, as we are supposed to believe, they were so important to begin with.

A perfect example of this is the “Nanking Massacre” of 1937, now a much-contested historical event in the Sino-Japanese War (1937—45). The Chinese claim that the Japanese went on a brutal rampage resulting in 300,000 deaths. The Japanese claim they were responding to irregular troops in civilian clothing using guerrilla tactics, with a much lower death toll.

Even though this is now presented as a pivotal historical event and something that we are all supposed to know, the surprising thing is that, like the Jewish Holocaust from the same era (which began to be used to advance Jewish ethnic interests after the 1967 Arab-Israeli war and really only gained traction in the 1970s [here, p. 42ff]), it got off to a rather late start, becoming suddenly very, very important decades after it actually happened.

Not only had Clio the Muse of History descended the staircase before anything of importance had been written about this supposedly groundbreaking event, but she had climbed into her carriage, arrived home, and kicked off her shoes as well. If Nanking was so important surely it should have been broached at the first practical opportunity, say in the immediate post-war period. Of course it wasn’t, not by the Chinese nor by anyone else. As it was, the event had to wait until the publication of Iris Chang’s best seller The Rape of Nanking in 1997 to really get its historical marching boots on — a full 60 years after the event! Some staircase! Read more

Why is Europe Rejecting Nationalism?

/42 Comments/in , /by

Based on the outcome of the Brexit referendum and Donald Trump’s victory in 2016, many began to hope that a wave of right wing populism would sweep across the West.  This, unfortunately, has not been the case.  Instead, 2016 and 2017 have showed, for now at least, that Europe will consider but ultimately reject nationalism.  I’d have to reluctantly agree with a Washington Post article, “A specter is haunting Europe — the specter of nationalism.  For now, though, it’s mostly just that: a specter. It hasn’t been able to move beyond its phantasmological form and actually take power outside of Hungary and Poland.”

It is all too true that nationalism in Europe remains only an apparition which tantalizes us with every election only to dissipate with the victory of yet another internationalist shill for global special interests.  Nationalism was rejected in Austria, the Netherlands, and of course in France.  In the UK, nationalism was “accepted” in the form of the Brexit referendum, but Theresa May’s government is certainly not an authentic British nationalism.

Across the European continent, nationalist candidates have been routinely losing national elections.  Austria’s Norbert Hofer of the Freedom Party failed to win the Austrian Presidency in a painfully close election, The Netherlands’s Geert Wilders of the Party for Freedom styled himself as the European Donald Trump and had an equally dazzling coif of hair, but got only 13% in the Dutch election, and France’s fiery Marine Le Pen of the National Front ultimately lost in a landslide to an ex-Goldman Sachs executive. Read more

Review: The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam by Douglas Murray

/97 Comments/in , /by

The Strange Death of Europe: Immigration, Identity, Islam
Douglas Murray
Bloomsbury Continuum, 2017

I finished reading Douglas Murray’s The Strange Death of Europe just 24 hours before a Libyan Muslim detonated an explosive device at the exit of an arena in Manchester, sending arrows of shrapnel into dozens of concert-goers and confirming, in an instant, every one of Murray’s arguments. Timely, erudite, and needed, The Strange Death of Europe is the story of European cultural and racial ‘assisted suicide,’ with a focus on the effects of ongoing mass immigration from Africa, the Indian sub-continent, and the Middle East. This is a book that, in terms of its central arguments and pool of facts, will say nothing new to those on the Alt Right. In this movement we live our lives with the burden of truly painful knowledge. We know that our current course will lead only to dispossession and destruction. Everything about the contemporary world suggests that we are a generation born either to witness the end of our great race, or to orchestrate its most stunning and earth-shattering rebirth. This book offers nothing in terms of assisting the latter, but in terms of its contribution to an understanding of the former, its unique strength may be said to lie in the concise, compelling, and clear-headed manner in which it advances the thesis that multiculturalism is a death sentence on Europe. Murray’s book is a forceful refutation of the lie that we are ‘progressing’ to a better European future, taking the theme of impending European death to a mass audience, particularly in Britain where the book climbed to number three in both the Sunday Times and UK Amazon bestseller lists, and sold out in numerous branches of the country’s largest high street book merchant. Despite ubiquitous socio-political conditioning, there is clearly a hunger for dissenting speech.

Murray opens with the stark statement: “Europe is committing suicide,” soon refined into the more nuanced argument that Europe’s political leaders, together with a complicit media, are in the process of taking their populations down the road of ethnic and cultural annihilation. The apparent acquiescence of European populations in this diabolical journey is ascribed by Murray to a number of factors. Europe has lost faith in its beliefs, traditions and legitimacy. It is in the midst of an “existential tiredness.” At the heart of this loss of direction and sense of self is the imposition of a cult of guilt — a cult that has grown weed-like from the fertile soil of Holocaust and slavery narratives advanced by the enemies of our people. Murray remarks that “More than any other continent or culture in the world today, Europe is now deeply weighed down with guilt for its past.” Read more

Manchester Malady: Traitors Lie, Children Die

/1 Comment/in , /by

“Diversity is indeed a strength, not a threat.” That’s a line from the Queen’s Christmas message in 2004. “I love the diversity of London — I just feel comfortable.” That’s a line from the former immigration minister Barbara Roche in 2011. “Our priority as a government must always be to keep people safe.” That’s a line from the British Home Secretary Amber Rudd in 2017.

Liberal fantasy: “Peace + Love Manchester”

Racial and religious enrichment

All three women are suicide-mommas promoting an insane and deadly liberalism. All of them bear some responsibility for the suicide-bombing in Manchester on 22nd May 2017. But give Barbara Roche her due: unlike the other two, she was speaking the truth. She does indeed love an atomized society, because it fulfils her deepest political ambition: “to combat anti-semitism and xenophobia in general.” Roche is Jewish and feels paranoid in a homogeneous White society. That’s why she worked so hard to open Britain’s borders to the Third World under the traitorous Tony Blair.

And if the glorious project of racial and religious enrichment goes wrong, Barbara can always seek refuge in Israel, where her Jewish identity gives her an automatic right of citizenship. But let’s suppose that Salman Abedi, the British citizen responsible for the Manchester vibrancy, had wanted to take a short holiday in Israel to soak up some sun and enjoy some of that famous Israeli courtesy and charm.

Unpleasant reality: Robo-cops to combat vibrancy

Would he have been granted a tourist visa? No, not a chance. He was on terrorist watch-lists maintained by both British and American intelligence, so we can be absolutely certain that Israel would have refused him entry. Israel would also have refused his Libyan parents entry if they’d tried to claim asylum as refugees when they escaped the Gaddafi regime. Israel’s government really does make it a “priority” “to keep people safe.” Read more

The Golden Globalists: MacShane and Macron vs Marine Le Pen

/12 Comments/in /by

Slugs are remarkably resilient creatures. If a snail falls from height onto a hard surface, it might well crack its shell and perish. A slug falling the same distance will absorb the impact in its springy flesh and slither away unharmed, eye-stalks jauntily re-extended.

A Fraudster Bounces Back

Did Denis “The Slug” MacShane draw inspiration from his molluscan namesake? I like to think so. Metaphorically speaking, this veteran socialist, a former Minister for Europe and policy advisor to Labour Friends of Israel, fell from a great height in 2013, when he was jailed for fraud amid much gloating by his unsavoury fascist and anti-Semitic opponents. Decent folk will rejoice to learn that Denis has absorbed the impact and slithered away unharmed — and unimpoverished. This is currently his resumé at the Euro-lobbyists Avisa:

DENIS MACSHANE Senior Advisor

Nationality: British

Dr Denis MacShane is Britain’s former Minister of Europe and served on the Council of Europe and NATO Parliamentary Assembly, representing the UK as a Member of Parliament. …

Denis knows many of the key EU ministers in national government and parliaments as well as most senior people in Brussels[.] Denis has one of the best address books for key European political, media, policy and official deciders. He counts several European Commissioners and key MEPs from multiple countries and parties as personal friends, and is one of the few senior policy experts in the UK to speak up for the European Parliament.

He still writes regularly for European and US media outlets including the Financial Times, Le Monde, Libération, Die Welt, the Globalist and Slate. In addition to his native English, Denis speaks French and German. Areas of expertise: Brexit; External Relations; Security and Defence (Dr Denis MacShane at Avisa)

Hither and Slither: Denis “The Slug” MacShane

The resumé tactfully omits his conviction for fraud and the name of the constituency he served as an MP. It was Rotherham, of course. And it’s now infamous around the world for the sexual abuse that took place there. Hundreds of White working-class girls were being raped, prostituted and beaten by brutal misogynists who regarded them as nothing but objects for their own pleasure and profit. This was a horrifying example of Patriarchal Oppression, so what a stroke of luck for the girls that they had a Labour MP and a Labour council to defend their interests. Rotherham was overflowing with feminists, anti-rape activists and child-welfare workers. Read more

Justin Murphy’s “The psychology of prohibiting outside thinkers”

/80 Comments/in , , , /by

Here is Justin Murphy describing his background, research, and activism:

Why is there not more rebellion against status quo institutions? How have economic and political processes pacified our capacity for radical collective action? As a political scientist, I am interested in the roles played by information, communication, and ideology in the pacification of political resistance and conflict. Before joining the faculty of Politics and IR at the University of Southampton in the UK, I did my PhD at Temple University in the US. There I was active in Occupy Wall Street, some civil disobedience and shutting down of things, some longer-term campaigns against the big U.S. banks, and sundry other works and deeds, including a radical warehouse project where I lived for nearly three years.

So Murphy is an academic on the left. He is therefore part of the establishment, a card-carrying member of the institutional structure that dominates intellectual discourse in the West. But, unlike the vast majority of his academic brethren, he is quite aware that the left is now the status quo and that it is doing everything it can to preserve its elite status — and that its self-preserving tactics are at base nothing more than irrational assertions of power and privilege. Murphy makes these claims in a blogpost: “The psychology of prohibiting outside thinkers.” Part of the subtitle says it all: “The real motivation of respectable progressivism is managing guilty conscience and conserving bourgeois privileges.”

What’s so refreshing about this is that instead of “exclud[ing] independent right-wing intellectual work on moral grounds,” he would actually “enjoy thinking” with intellectuals on the right. Indeed, moral indictments have become the stock in trade of establishment intellectuals — as noted in my three-part “Moralism and Moral Arguments in the War for Western Survival.” Moral condemnations are easy. No intellectual heavy lifting required. All one need do is appeal to conventional moral intuitions as shaped by the the same institutions that are now the status quo — the media and academic culture. As I note, those who dissent from the status quo are “not only misguided, [they are] malevolent … consumed by hatred, anger and fear towards non-Whites, gays, women and the entire victim class pantheon, or so goes the stereotype And that’s the problem. Being cast as evil means you are outside the moral community. There’s no need to talk with you, no need to be fair, or even worry about your safety. You are like an outlaw in Old Norse society  — ‘a person [who] lost all of his or her civil rights and could be killed on sight without any legal repercussions.’” Read more

The KosChertified? App is Here!

/51 Comments/in /by

Go to Koschertified.com to upload the app.

Many in our movement are often heard complaining on podcasts and in the comments sections of too much talk, but no action.  Sure, it would be both practical and effective if our politicians represented our interests and took action on our behalf,  but that’s a pipe dream!  Also, it is certainly unreasonable to expect most patriots and White nationalists to find their way to UC-Berkeley every time an Alt-Right or conservative speaker gets silenced.  And do we all possess the same courage as that recently displayed by “Stickman” wading into a seething throng of antifa?

Actually, some of the most common demonstrations of power by our adversaries has been in their dominating critical industries, creating monopolies, and doing it all with the host majority blinded to its very existence or protecting themselves constitutionally through our freedom of religion.  Some of their power plays have been accomplished by means of boycotting (e.g. in their methods of acquiring newspapers or sending others to bankruptcy with diminished advertising revenue; or in their political and economic opposition to Germany in 1933).  In fact, just look how aggressively the BDS movement is being counter-attacked.  They understand the power of the boycott, and in their world only they are permitted access to use it.

So why am I bringing this up, you may ask?  Just the other day my girlfriend discovered a new app to help her in her grocery shopping: KosChertified?  It was less than $2, strikingly different than most, and as she knows well the direction my politics leans, she decided to share it with me.  I searched through its contents and couldn’t believe my eyes!  You would have thought it was written by an investigative reporter from Red Ice!  But it wasn’t.  Here in my palm laid the 21st-century tool that delivers both an expose’ of the little-known kosher-certification industry, its controversial conflicts of interests (especially with our interests), and a database of food products that haven’t been certified kosher!  Now here was something we could use ourselves, I thought.  Looking at the app’s website, www.koschertified.com, one finds that “over one million food products have been certified kosher!” (Note: This app is only for the United States.) Clearly this kosher sector of the food industry falls into that discussion on power above — where most ordinary people are simply oblivious to their total domination.  In fact, glancing through the app’s convenient grocery list application one finds numerous food categories that have a real scarcity of non-certified products — and some are empty, like sports drinks and horseradish!  So what does this portend for our grocery shopping future?  Perhaps the possibility of having absolutely no choice — fifteen aisles of products all having been blessed by one of the many rabbinical agencies that oversee every detail of the food we buy!  And I’m sure this will be a free service, so that they can “be the light unto our nations.” Read more