Featured Articles

The Suppression of Free Speech in the UK

/31 Comments/in /by

The recent tragedy in France in which 17 people were murdered by Jihadists is yet further evidence, if any were needed, that Islam is at war with the West. The Western political class maybe in denial of this fact, believing as it does that these Jihadists represent a tiny minority and that Islam generally is benign. The political class it seems will have to witness more of these terrorist atrocities before it wakes up, if it ever does, to the reality which confronts it.

It is clear that the political classes of the West can no longer guarantee the safety of their citizens and that in their desperation to preserve their multiracial utopia they will continue to undermine our traditional freedoms, long fought for by our ancestors, in order to appease Islam and make Europe ever more Sharia-compliant. This is why the recent demonstrations in France, as a supposed show of strength and unity against terrorism and the right of free speech, are hypocritical and risible.

The sad fact is that neither France nor any other European country remains united. They are becoming increasingly fractured societies along ethnic, cultural and religious fault lines. European countries are now rife with self-segregated communities who have very little time for each other but seem united in their hostility towards the host culture and its people. Within many of these segregated ghettos there are high levels of crime, prostitution, violence as well as high levels of alienation from the host society and its values; there is also a growing resentment towards the native white populations by immigrant groups both old and new. Within Islamic ghettoes levels of female genital mutilation, honour killings, forced marriages, corruption and radicalisation continue to increase and it is within these embedded communities that terrorist atrocities are hatched. The obvious incompatibility between Islam and European civilisation is plain for all to see, although the political class remain blind to these realities. Read more

Wet Whites, Dry Blacks and the Secret Apartheid of American Culture

/16 Comments/in , /by

American film and TV is often accused of racism. Leftists will complain that Blacks are underrepresented, only play minor roles, and are usually shown in a negative light. White nationalists will talk about “Magic Negroes” and the absurd absence of Black criminals and villains, when Blacks clearly play a much larger role in the criminal fraternity.

This is not unlike the case of the ancient Caledonians who were described as a fair-haired people by the Romans and as a dark-haired people by the subsequent Anglo-Saxons. In other words, it’s the case of the blind men and the elephant yet again.

The crux of the problem is simple. It stems from the central fact of “racial asymmetry” that exists in American society. By racial asymmetry I mean the complete imbalance between Blacks and Whites in society. It goes well beyond the simple fact that Whites are around 60-65% of the population and Blacks around 12-13%. Added to this numerical disparity is the disparity in achievement and dysfunction.

In real life, there are simply a lot less Blacks in higher or meritorious positions, and thus less scope for genuine and interesting Black characters in the culture. For the same reasons, there are also awkward effective stereotypes of Blacks – as opposed to mainstream-promoted ones. This distinction is important because effective stereotypes reflect attitudes that influence behavior, such as where one chooses to live. Read more

What More Reason Do We Need to Stop the Muslim Invasion?

/38 Comments/in , /by

In the wake of the Charlie Hebdo tragedy, more than ever politicians, media and elites reiterate that only a small (indeed, tiny) minority of Muslims commit acts like the recent Paris attacks.

First of all, we must observe that this is not a statement of fact, but rather an expression of hope.

For we don’t know the number or percentage of would-be terrorists that the Muslim population in each Western country harbours.

Because to know how many they are would also mean knowing who they are — all of them. In which case, we would have solved the terrorist problem with closer surveillance or, much better, expulsion.

So, almost by definition, we haven’t got the faintest idea of their number.

We can’t even rely on the figure of aggressions actually carried out as a good indicator, because this is only a fraction of the total of terror attacks planned, most of which have been foiled by police and secret services: many of these we haven’t even gotten to hear about. And the total number of planned offensives, prevented or executed, doesn’t offer predictions about future ones in such uncertain circumstances.

What we do know is that in several countries Muslim immigrant populations tend to get more radicalised with each successive generation, so the threat is going to increase. This can explain the by-now thousands of jihadists travelling from Europe to fight in Syria and Iraq and often returning to Europe with terrorist training and intentions.

If what happens in the rest of the world, where Islamism and its violence are on the rise, the prospects are not happy. Read more

The Cultural Narrative in Europe Falls Apart

/27 Comments/in /by

 

It would be hard to come up with a satire to do justice to the farcical scene in Paris on Sunday when our leaders masqueraded as defenders of free-speech. Probably one of the best comments was a sketch by Rich, the cartoonist for London’s House of Commons blog, Guido.

What would Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu, author of last summer’s Operation Protective Edge bombardment in which more than 2,100 Palestinians and at least 7 journalists were killed, say to the man the West has chosen to lead the Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko who has been shelling and starving out civilians in Donetsk for months.

After days of flailing around, Europe’s elites have agreed on a line – free speech is sacrosanct, but only when it comes to mocking Christianity and Islam. The Holocaust is off-limits as is any questioning of immigration or multiculturalism.

And now they have found an enemy they are brave enough to take on – ordinary White people who dare question the elite immigration consensus. Across the continent phony conservatives are joining forces with the left to exclude the anti-immigration lobbies from the debate. Any democracy pretence has gone. It is all about power now. Read more

Jonathan Chait and the End of Liberal Society in the West

/45 Comments/in , /by

The Charles Hebdo affair presents a difficult dilemma to liberals and the left in general. Typically, they have no problem with censorship of views they don’t like. They jump on board campaigns to fire college professors for publishing about race differences or White dispossession, and they shed no tears when some poor soul in the media gets fired for blurting out something about Jewish power in Hollywood. They would love for such people to go to prison.

But they want to think of themselves as principled and high-minded. So what to say about the murderous attempt to shut down Charlie Hebdo?

Here’s what Jonathan Chait says in New York magazine:

Let us stipulate for the sake of argument that Charlie Hebdo is crude and even racist. Freedom of expression is not a strong defense of crude, racist, or otherwise stupid expression. Indeed, one of the most common and least edifying defenses made by people who have proffered offensive opinions is that they have the right to free speech. The right of expression is not the issue when the objection centers on the content.

This last comment—that “the right of expression is not the issue when the objection centers on the content”— reflects Chait’s intellectual arrogance about the dogmas of liberalism — that for example,  there is no such thing as race, but if there is, genetic differences are irrelevant to average group differences in IQ or any other trait important for success in the contemporary world, etc. From his point of view, these dogmas are set in stone and massively supported by scientific data. So it’s perfectly legitimate to exclude people who dissent from these dogmas from having any voice in the mainstream media, and exert pressure to get them fired them from their jobs or put them in jail.

And Chait, as a prominent contributor to the elite media, is well aware that he is in a great position to do exactly that.  Read more

“This Comment Has Been Removed”: Charlie Hebdo, The Guardian and Free Speech

/37 Comments/in /by

Liberalism is not so much an ideology as a psychiatric condition. How many ordinary Whites have been murdered, raped or injured for life by Third World immigrants in the past fifty years? Who knows? Who cares? Certainly not the Guardian. But dead left-wing cartoonists – now that is serious. In response to the massacre in Paris, the Guardian sternly and resolutely organized a conference of its finest windbags. This was the line-up:

At the We are Charlie event, organised in response to the attack in Paris that left 12 people dead, a panel of writers discussed why the French magazine had been targeted and how other publications should respond. Chaired by Guardian columnist the Rev Giles Fraser, it featured former Le Monde editor and Guardian leader writer Natalie Nougayrède, Observer columnists Nick Cohen and Henry Porter, cartoonists Steve Bell and Martin Rowson and Guardian writers Sunny Hundal and Shahidha Bari. (We are Charlie: ‘freedom of speech needs to be strongly defended’, The Guardian, 9th January 2015)

I count two non-Whites and at least two Jews, Giles Fraser and Nick Cohen. So the panel was chaired and numerically dominated by people from groups that don’t identify with or care about native White Europeans. When Cohen wrote about the Charlie Hebdo massacre in the London Spectator, he didn’t mention mass immigration once. But he did mention “white racists” and note that a “religion is not a race.” Plainly, then, he supports Britain’s “hate-speech” laws and doesn’t believe in free speech.

As far as I know, the panellist Steve Bell isn’t Jewish. He’s just a deluded White liberal who draws self-righteous and unfunny cartoons for the Guardian. His response to the disturbing reality of the Hebdo massacre was simple. He pretended that it wasn’t there. Laughter bends gun-barrels. The presence of millions of Third-World non-Whites in the West doesn’t matter, because liberals can magic their pathologies away with bad cartoons. That’s what Bell obviously thinks. Read more

Garron Helm vs. Charlie Hebdo: Elite versus non-elite mechanisms for censoring public discourse

/84 Comments/in , /by

Here is a sobering thought.  How many of those left-wing defenders of free speech who stood to remember the victims of Charlie Hebdo also condemned the PEGIDA (Patriotic Europeans against Islamization of the West) anti-Islamification rallies in Dresden over Christmas?  How many would have supported the counter-rallies in which the German government is doing so much to encourage?

What would the reaction of those same people have been if the targets had been members of anti-immigration Front National or any other right wing or nationalist group.  We know the answer because of their reaction after the murders of Dutch anti-Islamisation campaigner Pym Fortuyn and film-maker Theo Van Gogh; sneers, contempt and an undisguised glee that the right-wing had got what it deserved.

And what of the victims themselves?  Indeed they were in many ways caricatures of the antifa campaigners who would go to the barricades to preserve mass immigration and the end of France.

Take Stéphane Charbonnier, the editor of Charlie Hebdo, and one of the victims. He is of a kind you can find in every White country in the West.  A dedicated “antifascist” who occupied a crucial opinion-shaping position in the French media.  In fact, as Joshua Bonehill points out,  everybody killed in the attacks today would have almost certainly have been anti-White and left-Wing  and there’s a great irony behind that as well.

Another victim was cartoonist Georges Wolinski who had a strong Jewish identity and whose work appeared in a number of left-leaning publications besides Charlie Hebdo, including Liberation (which has agreed to allow Charlie Hebdo to use its offices in the wake of the murders). Read more