General

Jared Taylor on the George Floyd Insanity

Wach auf!  Wach auf!  Arise!  Arise!

The swollen waves of dislodged souls
Are rushing to our shores;
Like flood waters tainted with despair
They crest our tall fences at the border
And empty willy-nilly onto foreign soil.

Abetting voices lift in unison and trumpet to the downtrodden many:
Run toward freedom, slaves of poverty no more,
Flee your hostile enclaves from below;
Shed your ruthless masters, your stagnant civilizations;
Fresh hope beckons from abroad in a land
That once was yours!

Have mercy on our plight, they cry out from their serpentine caravans.
Let our vagabond millions find solace on your rich plains.
Our faithful labor will nourish your fields and give you bodies for future wealth.

Link our lands, put your fears aside, guilt-ridden people of privilege!
Tear down these unsightly shields, open your borders of shame
To our needy treks! Unite our dissident tribes!

Citizens of the world are we: the North and the South are one
in the making of blended nations.
Compassion is a central force and sharing a solemn duty,
Generosity to all in want is God’s will!

So say the roving hordes, their arms flung wide, families in tow.

Home-bred voices call out from within to those who force our nation’s doors:
Where will the native ones be when the human scales are tipped?
Will your hearts reach out to theirs in your newly dominant role?
In times of hardship and travail, will freedom and justice be dispensed as before?
Migrants from other lands, will compassion be your guiding spirit, will sacrifice for all prevail?

Voices from without reply in rage:  “Demons the lot of you, vile monsters of division, apostles of hatred, Be gone! Be gone!
See how these fertile loins, in their proud diversity, will birth justly browned faces in the milling crowds to come.
Pale children of bigotry, meek and timorous, you invoke our scorn.”

So say the unfettered masses gathering at the gate!

Light-skinned martyrs in dwindling numbers are we, besieged within fragile boundaries and witnessing our demise with passive, fearful awe.
Our forefathers’ evil ways lurk in our conflicted selves and must be held in check. Equity will now be our collective mantra and renegades of any stripe will warrant full exclusion. Our wretched past deprives us of any meaningful future…and deservedly so in progressive eyes.

“Be gone! Be gone!  Remnants of iniquity, barriers to a kinder world” scream out the vengeful masters of America yet to be.

Their strident accusations echo across the land: “Deeply colored bodies in chains laid the foundation for the wealth that Europe’s children now enjoy. Your whiteness is the primal sin; seek atonement, deny your heritage and compensate for tribal crimes of times long past.”  Cowardly impotent, we embrace this baleful fate. We shoulder our phantom guilt to meld with the architects of contrition and redemption.

Wach auf! Resist!  Resist!  Advocates of solidarity, soldiers of fairness;
Our color betrays us, our leaders reject us.
Where can we turn? What more can we do?
Edenic lands of succor and respite are the true ends of our search.
Ample fruits of our struggle hang low to the ground; victory is our noble goal.
The truth from Europe’s Enlightened prime must now adorn our crown.
Wach auf! Arise! Take comfort in tomorrow’s promise
of Western values strong and wise
Glistening like banners unfurled against the meandering tide.

We have moved!

I felt a need to relocate after being doxxed where I was previously. You never know what might happen once you are outed, with the militant left able to flout the law in many places, particularly in Oregon where I was previously. So I moved but remained in the Northwest. This is the new mailing address:

The Occidental Observer
9323 N. Government Way, Suite 69
Hayden, ID 83835
Thanks to all those who are making recurrent donations through their bank. You will have to change the address in order to continue, although I will be able to forward mail for a while.
Thanks again for all your support!

Vaccine Passports, White Terror and Political Control: Who’s Behind It. And Why?

“A registry of immunization will be needed with names entered after immunization is completed. Adequate immunization may require more than a single vaccination, and the durability of protection by different vaccines may vary and may require periodic booster immunizations. Thus, immunized persons will need to receive expiration date-stamped certification cards, which should be issued to all who are immunized in the country, whether here legally or not. True, conscientious objectors could refuse. There are no such alternatives for vaccination. Do not honor religious objections. Do not allow objections for personal preference.  Vaccine refusers could lose tax credits or be denied nonessential government benefits. Health insurers could levy higher premiums for those who by refusing immunization place themselves and others at risk, as is the case for smokers. Private businesses could refuse to employ or serve unvaccinated individuals. Schools could refuse to allow unimmunized children to attend classes. Public and commercial transit companies — airlines, trains and buses — could exclude refusers. Public and private auditoriums could require evidence of immunization for entry.” Dr. Michael Lederman, Maxwell J. Mehlman and Dr. Stuart Youngner, Case Western Reserve University (USA Today, August, 2020)

In my last article, I wrote about the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court, and how it is led by and composed of a small, tightly linked personal faction of mostly Jewish academic law professors who are ideologically aligned on the progressive Left.  Rather than a public commission, it is more of a private trust.  It seeks to transform the Supreme Court into a legislative body that reliably behaves in majority support for progressive Left programs.  Those programs include a portfolio of changes to, or the bypassing of, the Constitution, and its protections against excessive government intrusion into private life.  It also includes the ratification of new laws involving the full panoply of biosecurity, including mandated “vaccines” and numerous restrictions on congregation, travel, and even political affiliation.  It also seeks to codify any resistance to a passport system as “terror,” and especially to establish that conservatism and resistance among Whites are fundamental threats to government and society in general. Below, I describe as a follow-up, the nature of the parties behind the larger Covid security program, of which the Presidential Commission is merely a necessary part of its implementation.

The Covid biosecurity program is a large, complex system that is made up of many special interests in what is a coordinated syndicate or network.  Most of its members are fairly visible and readily identifiable: large pharmaceutical firms and their investors; newer bio-engineering ventures and their hedge fund backers; big technology firms looking to capture new markets in biosecurity, data collection and management, or testing, tracing, tracking and bio-ID systems; and naturally, the intelligence and defense establishment.

But some are less obvious. They are cloaked within larger interest groups, and careful to remain within the confines of institutional authority symbols such as universities, research firms, media, so-called expert health organizations, and of course, the government. The country’s network of college and university campuses is also a key component of the “Covidianism” construct that has created entire new cognitive and behavioral routines centered in a reinforced obedience to central authority, and the establishment of self-policing among peer groups in order to ensure group compliance with standardized expectations in the use of face masks, social distancing, and ultimately in the willingness to submit to experimental “vaccination.”  Some young adults are calling their college campuses a “prison” and that comparison may be apt. Many university medical facilities have even become the “official” vaccination centers for their regions or communities, some using a “lottery” system, or soliciting the public to volunteer as experiment subjects.  Some universities are using a “yield management” model by creating scarcity to manipulate demand.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aerial college campus view: “This feels like prison.”  Universities are a perfect nation-wide networked camp system for processing, indoctrination, experimentation and bio-social engineering.  Right: Harvard Law’s Cass Sunstein and former Obama Director of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) who asserts the necessity of “cognitive infiltration.”

The sudden almost explosive assault of emergency pandemic policy forced on the American public has all the hallmarks of official sanction and authority—the kinds of authority that the public responds to generally without too much questioning. And in the case of a personal health risk, there is typically a very strong self-protection response that almost guarantees a systematic public cooperation with centralized direction.  The impression that all of us tend to have, is that the information that is produced and broadcast from these institutions of authority is a natural and responsible public service response to an emergency that fits credibly with their stated purpose and putative expertise.  We assume that institutions like the C.D.C. (Center for Disease Control) or the W.H.O. (World Health Organization) are simply acting just as they are supposed to: as public agencies of protection and civil defense. They are seen as trusted humanitarian agencies, and it is assumed that they represent scientifically informed defense against large-scale disasters that are beyond the control of individuals, communities or even states.

But this is an incorrect assumption.  The global health organizations are highly porous politically, they are utterly dependent on numerous sources of financial support, and most of all, they are fully in compliance with larger authority networks, including select governments, private foundations, and authority figures from the political-state sphere.

  “The illegal we do immediately; the unconstitutional takes a little longer.” Concurrently timed with the first public ‘pandemic’ announcement by the CDC, Kissinger ran his World Order WSJ op-ed where he asserted “The Coronavirus Pandemic Will Forever Alter the World Order: The U.S. must protect its citizens from disease while starting the urgent work of planning for a new epoch.”  The new order? It’s all about depopulating the countryside and moving to cities. “Empty half the earth of its inhabitants: It’s the only way to save the planet.” 

These authority figures and symbols also appear natural or acceptable, or even necessary.  They carry forward their credibility from government service, from the imprimatur of elite university research and from the power and influence of highly concentrated financial leverage.  It is important to appreciate that the Covid memetic was decades in the making and didn’t just come out of nowhere.  It has a long pedigree in special interest ambitions that find their confidence in a highly cultivated intellectual elitism that asserts a higher-order understanding of largescale and macroeconomic risk—its central animating cause is global warming, and nothing is more urgent than to attack directly the cause: human population.  It naturally seeks institutional concentration and consolidation in order to realize its ambitions, but it is also animated by specific cultural beliefs and propensities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. university research and the Rockefeller Foundation: “In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored order.”  The Rockefeller Foundation, Future Scenarios Report issued in 2010 on a virus pandemic simulation.  Right: Sustainable = depopulation.

 Through these large-scale institutional influences, their peer groups and counter-party organizations like universities take their direction, and follow their ideological objectives, even if those ideologies or objectives are not fully understood: what is important is to maintain a stable economic equilibrium, and foundations such as Rockefeller provide that equilibrium, and also hold out the threat of disfavor.     

Ezekiel Emanuel as paradigmatic

A central adjunct to the foundation structure of influence and control, is the select, targeted and strategic placement of an “expertocracy” that is firmly embedded within the larger influence network and which straddles government, university and cultural components that are necessary to attain a reliable forward momentum and compliance with directives, policy, and advice.  There are few individuals who manifest that role, more than Ezekiel Emanuel.

The Zionist brothers Emanuel: (Center): The University of Pennsylvania’s Ezekiel Emanuel, Biden-Harris Covid advisor: “Life after 75 is not worth living”;  “Cases are surging. We need to maximize the number of inoculated students.
Ari Emanuel (right): working in politics and Hollywood;
Rahm Emanuel (left) “Never let a crisis go to waste” (or waste an opportunity to make one); the former Chicago Mayor’s Covid simulation operation: Crimson Contagion

But who exactly, is Ezekiel Emanuel?  And why is he wielding concentrated influence in American domestic policy concerning health care, population control, and especially, a program of forced vaccination on young adults, primarily through the nation’s network of colleges and universities?  To whom are his loyalties, and what are his objectives and larger allegiances?

All smiles: Ezekiel says that “Doctors take the Hippocratic Oath too seriously.”  White House Covid advisor, University of Pennsylvania’s Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel: “We need to maximize the number of inoculated students.” 

When one digs a little deeper into Ezekiel Emanuel’s past, it may become a little clearer how his ethno-religious upbringing and indoctrination, led to his overall psychological profile: authoritarianism, control, and even malevolence toward other groups such that oppression or even extermination or genocide, are justified and normalized as state-level policy, but carefully configured within otherwise legitimately perceived institutions.  In that regard it is a classic act of deception and terror that was specifically pursued by his Zionist father, also a doctor, and widely cited as a criminal terrorist with deep loyalties to Israel.

For many years, Dr. Emanuel benefitted by staying in the political shadow of his brother Rahm Emanuel, former congressman, Obama White House chief-of-staff, and Chicago mayor. Rahm also volunteered to work as a “fixer” in the IDF, like his father:

Rahm’s father Benjamin Emanuel served in the Irgun, a Jewish terrorist group that targeted British and Palestinian civilians — most famously with the King David Hotel bombing and the Deir Yassin massacre — to advance the goal of creating a Zionist state. This week, the elder Emanuel has not exactly assuaged doubts about his son’s pedigree. “Obviously, he will influence the president to be pro-Israel,” he told the Israel daily Maariv, “Why wouldn’t he be? What is he, an Arab?

Dr. Benjamin Emanuel brought up his three sons in a pro-Israel household.  All three hold dual citizenships and in their careers have worked at least as much for Israel interests as they putatively have American ones, and were culturally groomed by their father to be Israel “power-brokers.”  Ezekiel emerged onto the public scene as an advisor and “fixer” for Obama’s signature Affordable Heath Care Act.  And while the Obama-Clinton presidential and policy continuity plan was temporarily interrupted by the Trump victory, he quietly consolidated his position at the University of Pennsylvania, and then re-emerged from the shadows with the roll-out of the 2020 Covid program.   His model for U.S. biosecurity is indeed, the state of Israel under the continued authoritarian and Zionist operations of Benjamin Natanyahu, who is considered by many as among the world’s top global terrorist sponsors and operators.  This instinct has been turned inward on his own people (including the Orthodox who may have recently suffered under a Netanyahu-organized operation).  As an Israeli political dissident recently stated:

“We are being used as a model for the rest of the world.  Many of us are calling this a new holocaust in our own country.  You could not have created a bigger betrayal.  This has nothing to do with a virus.  It leaves behind the arguments of right and left, pro and anti, even religious designations, and asks of us: what are the most basic common denominators we share?”  (Ilana Rachel Daniel, Israeli political activist on Israel’s current state authoritarian “Green Pass” system and its “purity test” of compliance to Covid regulations).

It is precisely Israel’s “Green Pass” system, its purity test construct, and Israel’s cybersecurity legislative bill that Emanuel is eyeing as a model for the U.S.   Such a system not only serves a large syndication of commercial interests, but the state itself as a method of creating a “purified” two-tiered social system that is divided on political lines and rests on a permanent bio-state of control, tracking and even directed thought.

   

 

 

 

 

Israel’s Green Pass: Digital bands used for tracking people in Israel

The next step is the permeation of a transnational legal regime that, in effect, extends and consolidates the Israel model of biosecurity social, political and economic control, including through treaty agreements that specifically tie in the state of Israel as the constructive authority.  In this way, by this mechanism, Israel has realized a “colonizing” tool that extends through the global health institutions, and from there penetrates state-specific government institutions through their respective agencies, bypassing legislative deliberation, and working around and through traditional federal government structures.  The entire Covid “pharmakon” is permeated with Israel state and commercial interests, ideology, and political ambition.  There is no other single concentration and magnitude of ethno-cultural interests, even those of China, that provide the intellectual “DNA” of this world order fantasy.

Israel, Greece sign ‘green passport’ travel deal for vaccinated citizens.  Just the beginning? 

Much of the institutional “leakage” that allows this ideology to thrive and permeate into Western societies, is through the higher education complex which to an unprecedented degree in American history, consists of Jewish and pro-Israel administrative leadership.  A case in point is the University of Chicago, by many measurements, an epicenter of the Covid and Passport program.  Its president, Robert Zimmer, has been a loyal devotee of Israel-first policy and ideology, using the university as a platform (even inviting IDF officers to “teach” undergraduates).  He also has initiated joint ventures with Israel in molecular biology, and the Trustee chairman, Joseph Neubauer, is among the largest individual investors in Israeli weapons and related research (according to his Foundation public filings).

This by itself is not dispositive of a joint U.S.-Israel biosecurity program, but it does identify a representative element of the cooperative network between special interests in each country to a degree unlike any other such collaboration based on cultural, religious and geopolitical solidarity, one already formalized by the Global War on Terror that is centered in joint U.S.-Israel war prosecution.  The new biosecurity regime is merely part of the war, now turned inward.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Zimmer, backed by the Pritzker, the Gates and Rockefeller Foundations and US Department of Defense (through its Argonne National Labs), pushes the growth of research in microbiology and virus “gain-of-function.” Left: Zimmer holding a campus candlelight midnight vigil for Jewish synagogues.  Right, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Israeli President Shimon Peres look on as University of Chicago President Robert J. Zimmer and Rivka Carmi, President of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, sign an agreement establishing a collaborative research program. The signing ceremony took place at President Peres’ residence in Jerusalem.  A civil science program, or are there Israeli geopolitical implications?(1)

 The degree of such leakage has created a national security threat to the United States.  While this has been cited before, the degree of systematic undermining of U.S. sovereignty may be unprecedented, including the degree to which it has been engineered and orchestrated under a virus pandemic pretext, and with that, a comprehensive assault on U.S. institutions, including religious organizations and, perhaps most systematically, through the education complex.

Human institutions are capable of carrying out programs in a systematic way, but they are entirely dependent on direction.  They are easily “captured”  (Gates is the largest investor in the W.H.O.), and once strategically invaded, they are obedient.  The ideology stemming from ethno-religious and cooperative special interests, are the “code” that has activated the Covid program.  China plays a unique role, but that is another story for another time.

V.S. Solovyev is a graduate of the University of Chicago and a former science, technology and defense consultant.


  1. There are other motivations for this project beyond strictly local academic ones, including hydration and broader strategic development of Israel’s Negev desert, done in conjunction with the Zuckerberg Institute and Ben Gurion University; that is, it is also an effective US export or technology-transfer project that obviously has national security implications (somewhat managed politically by the construction of the first permanent US military base in Israel’s Negev region which most of the public is not aware of). Molecular engineering also has inherent, specific applications in new weapons science (it is among the most aggressively pursued science and technology projects by the Pentagon) including in polymer and nanoscale technology, which partly explains support by US Department of Defense and UChicago-managed Argonne National Labs, and by Woods Hole, and the Katz Institute. It is not likely that any actual civilian uses will find applications in public hydration projects outside Israel in the larger Middle East desert zones; however molecular engineering can also be used for desertification with application to land conversion and demographic modification for the oil and gas industry, a key Israel ambition. As reported in public media, Zimmer had a “long-simmering interest in creating a joint partnership with an Israeli university” and remarked that this project has “potential applications far beyond local issues).

Canada’s Contrived Immigration Chaos: Liberal Party Aiming for Permanent Hegemony by Importing a New Electorate

The hostile political and corporate elites in the United States and Canada are hell-bent on replacing their White citizens with denizens from the Third World. Canada’s federal Liberal party, led by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, and America’s Democrats are birds of a feather: they are both using population replacement to ensure perpetual electoral hegemony. We are ruled by a corrupt political class that despise us. Our independence, insistence on self-reliance and freedom are an impediment to them. So much so that Trudeau would like to see a rapid acceleration of the great replacement of old stock Canadians. Despite a worsening Covid-19 public health crisis in Canada, Trudeau’s government would see immigration levels skyrocket over the next three years, with over 400,000 entrants being let in each year. Careful observers speculate that the actual number will be far higher.

In an article published in the National Post in 2018, immigration lawyer Julie Taub and intelligence expert David Harris make the assessment that the true purpose of the Liberal party’s reckless disregard for Canadian immigration law is to import a new electorate: “Why is Canada pursuing this kind of policy? Sad to say, the evidence speaks for itself. … Official Ottawa’s averting of its gaze from border breaching, is only one facet of a much larger political impulse. The impulse? To import, through legal and perhaps illegal immigration and refugee intakes, large numbers of future, grateful prospective voting blocs, contrary to Canadians’ national interest.”

In March, the US House of Representatives passed two bills, the Promise and Dream Act and the Farm Workforce Modernization Act, which will help to ensure that the immigration floodgates remain wide open. Similarly, just last week, on 14 April 2021, Canada’s federal government announced that it will “grant permanent residency status to more than 90,000 temporary foreign workers and graduated international students as part of its goal to admit 401,000 immigrants this year.” It has been a priority for the Trudeau government to increase the number of immigrants admitted annually: the annual intake of permanent residents has climbed from 241,000 in 2015 to 341,000 in 2019.

In March 2021, Trudeau’s Immigration Minister Marco Mendicino announced that last year’s immigration levels will be increased by 117 percent to the highest rate in Canadian history. This year’s immigration intake will surpass the previous record of 400,900 immigrants set in 1913. The purported reason was to “accelerate our economic recovery.”

This recent intensification was foreshadowed by Trudeau’s initial immigration radicalism that began when he became prime minister in 2015. Candice Malcolm, in her book No Border, describes Trudeau’s immigration and refugee policies in detail from 2015 to 2019. During that time, Trudeau invited the world’s refugees to come to Canada on social media. On Twitter, the Prime Minister reassured potential newcomers that all would be welcome “no matter who they are or where they are from.”

Malcolm goes on to write that Trudeau refused to secure Canada’s border at the notorious Roxham Road illegal entry point; his federal government gave no heed to security concerns by allowing unvetted migrants from terrorist hotspots into the country. He championed the UN Global Compact on Migration and vilified journalists who questioned his motives; and he declared Canada to be a “post-national state” with “no core identity, no mainstream.”

Why would this be? Academic Ricardo Duchesne states that there is no better agent of radical Marxist change than the malleable Third World immigrant: “Immigrants are not only a political force, but a demographic-racial force that will transform White nations into mongrelized post-national states without any common identity other than deracinated masses of consumers grasping for identities in shopping malls and university halls.” For Leftist radicals, like Trudeau and his minders, who are now in power, the White working class has been a remarkable disappointment. They worked hard and grew to love the countries they built; they did not want to see it all given away to foreigners who took no part in the decades of back breaking labor. And worst of all, they were not “woke.” They could care less about LBGTQ+ and are horrified by all the talk of White fragility. The only way to irreparably change the West, including Canada, is to import a legion of Third World immigrants who will slavishly vote liberal and let Leftists stay in power in perpetuity.

One of Trudeau’s most trusted cabinet ministers, Canada’s federal Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, recently described Covid-19 as an opportunity to reshape Canada: “I really believe COVID-19 has created a window of political opportunity and maybe an epiphany.”  She was echoing similar sentiments expressed by Trudeau half a year ago at the UN when he spoke about the pandemic facilitating a great reset: “This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. … This is our chance to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to reimagine economic systems.”  The pandemic itself and purported initiatives to stimulate economic recovery have provided the pretexts and smokescreen to open the immigration floodgates to the Third World even wider. And the same people who are obsessed with imposing lockdowns and destroying small businesses could care less about public health implications of their policies.

For the radicals now in power, it’s ideologically anathema for the government to properly screen travelers and secure Canada’s borders. Just like the Biden administration in the U.S., they just will just wave them in and claim the borders are under control. Nothing must get in the way of permanent hegemony of the Left.

This has been devastating in the era of Covid, as provinces defer to Ottawa to “manage screening and quarantine provisions for cross-border travel.” Our borders remain open to pandemic hotspots like variant ravaged India because the current Liberal impulse to radically transform the demographic nature of Canada overrides the need to close our borders to foreigners who are potential Covid-19 carriers. Although completely insane in the current context, it is undoubtedly true. Trudeau and his chief deputy, Chrystia Freeland have said it themselves: Covid has presented a tremendous opportunity to demographically transform Canada no matter how many lives are ruined, no matter the cost, and no matter the number of Covid deaths.

Sources and Additional Links

Justine Hunter, “B.C.’s swelling COVID-19 cases fuelled by variants, travel,” The Globe and Mail, 16 April 2021, available: here.

John Ibbitson and Janice Dickson, “Ottawa aims to grant residency to 90,000 temporary workers and students,” The Globe and Mail, 14 April 2021, available: here.

Anna Mehler Paperny, “Migrant farmworkers coming to Canada remain at risk a year into COVID-19 pandemic,” The Globe and Mail, 14 April 2021, available: here.

“Immigration Levels Up 117%,” Blacklock’s Reporter, 9 March 2021, available: here.

“Trudeau government promises to raise immigration rates 117%,” True North, 9 March 2021, available: here.

Washington Watcher II, “The Traitorous Republicans Who Back Amnesty In 2021,” VDare, 18 March 2021, available: here.

Kareem El-Assal, “Saturday Surprise: Canada invites 27,332 Express Entry candidates in bold move,” CIC News, 14 February 2021, available: here.

“Majority of Canadians oppose Trudeau government’s immigration plan: study,” True North, 27 January 2021, available here.

Candice Malcolm, “Exclusive: 76% of Canadians want a total pause on immigration,” True North, 10 June 2020, available: here.

Candice Malcolm, No Border: Justin Trudeau’s Assault on Canadian Border Security, Magna Carta, 2019.

Ricardo Duchesne, “Immigrants Key Revolutionary Agent Of Cultural Marxists,” Council of European Canadians, 29 November 2020, available: here.

Rex Murphy, “Rex Murphy: Chrystia Freeland’s ‘epiphany’ that COVID-19 is an ‘opportunity’ — that’s pretty dark,” National Post, 15 April 2021, available: here.

Kevin MacDonald, “Tucker Carlson Doubles Down on Replacement, Explicitly Mentions White Replacement, and Targets the ADL’s Hypocrisy(!),” The Occidental Observer, 14 April 2021, available: here.

Kevin MacDonald, “Tucker Carlson mentions replacement in the context of immigration. Hatred ensues,” The Occidental Observer, 10 April 2021, available: here.

Julie Taub and David B. Harris, “Border refugee crisis all about importing new voting blocs,” National Post, 22 May 2018, available: here.

“Flights from Delhi to Vancouver questioned as India suffers record COVID-19 surge,” CBC News, 22 April 2021, available: here.

Emma Sandri, “Amid surging cases and ‘double mutant’ variant, flights from India touch down in Canada,” National Post, 19 April 2021, available: here.

 

How Will Wokeism Die?

Audio Version

Are we approaching an “Emperor’s
New Clothes” moment?

“Racist”, “Sexist”, “Homophobe”, “Transphobe”, “Nazi”, “White Supreeeemist”, etc., are, as we all know in the Dissident Right, the language of control that portions of the White population of the West use against other portions of the White population of the West to maintain control and social power.

Occasionally Non-Whites—usually weaponised by Whites of course—involve themselves in this power dynamic. But it is mainly a form of White-on-White violence, or tyranny, and like all such things it is deeply resented.

But, unlike earlier tyrannies, it is not well understood. Invisible chains are, after all, the most effective ones.But no tyranny can last indefinitely. Indeed, all tyrannies have to be constantly reinvented or rejigged, because, proportionate to their success, they all breed resistance, antithesis, and finally their own overthrow. So it will eventually be with Wokeism too, as well as its central “crime”, “sin”, or “taboo” that certain objectively valid generalisations and topics are somehow “evil”.

In order to facilitate the death of this particular tyranny on the free opinions of mankind—because, yes, its negative effects ripple out over the whole of humankind—we have to start thinking concretely of how Wokeism will actually die.

This is not immediately clear because those who suffer most from this tyranny—certain groups of straight, male cisgender Whites—often misunderstand their oppression so badly that they end up simply reinforcing it.
“Dems/Leftists are the real racists” is a classic example.
Another failing strategy is to embrace whichever term is used to oppress you, along the lines of “Yes, I’m a racist/Nazi! So what?”In both cases the subject just strengthens their own oppression; in the first example by agreeing that the words of tyranny should have power (“Dems/Leftists are the real racists”), and in the second by isolating themselves and agreeing that they should not have power (“Yes, I’m a racist/Nazi! So what?”)
But eventually, after a lot of false starts and toing-and-froing, some sort of effective resistance against the White-on-White tyranny of Wokeism is bound to emerge. Here, in these pages, we have already had some worthwhile attempts to deconstruct the juggernaut going back several years:
There are no doubt others that I have missed.
These are mainly intellectual critiques. But a truly effective resistance against Wokeism is likely to take on a more unpredictable and populist form. With that observation in mind, my predictions are that the death of Wokeism will include some of the following elements:
  1. In Europe and elsewhere it will take on a form of anti-Americanism. Those using “woke” jargon will be denounced as lapdogs of the American Empire and its sick culture, and accused of resorting to “American words” when they make their usual power plays. They will be associated with America’s Globohomo Imperium. This is not as unlikely as it may sound to some Americans because it is undeniable that Wokeism is all part and parcel of US attempts at globally projecting its “anti-cultural” power.
  2. Anti-Wokeism will also increasingly focus on wokeism as nothing more than a tool of oppression. Already non-woke, straight, male cisgender Whites are the most oppressed group in Western societies. This has been masked by their ability to cope with and overcome this imposed and artificial handicap. But, in recent years we have seen the oppression escalate to the point where it is really starting to bite not just the core group but also adjacent groups like gay Whites and White females. Even the White exploiters of the tyrannical mechanism must be increasingly ambivalent about its benefits to them, as the power they gain from it ultimately works to undermine and destroy them.
  3. In America the two trends above will be weaker, because that country is the font of this poison and, in certain important respects, Wokeism serves as a useful social cement for what is in reality a deeply fragmented and asymmetrical society. However, the ongoing underclass replacement that we see in America, where Hispanics have been pushing out Blacks, will highlight the Black Underclass-White Leftist Upper-class synergy that has always been at the heart of Wokeism. In short, Wokeism in America will be perceived as a class problem.
  4. As a result of this, Authentic Black nationalists will become more aware of how they have been weaponised and used to serve inter-White power struggles. They will respond by working to “decolonize” Black identity politics from White Leftist elite control, and instead seek synergy, Malcom-X-style, with legitimate identitarian groups in American society.

Reposted from Affirmative Right, with permission.

Lipton Matthews interviews Kevin MacDonald on Western Individualism

This interview was almost exclusively on my book Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition and how it differs from Joseph Henrich’s The WEIRDest People in the World. I need a haircut