General

Tuesday in Gaza: Starving Gazans, aid workers and journalists

/1 Comment/in /by

On Tuesday in Gaza the IDF seems again to have refrained from major massacres at food distribution sites. However continued bombardment all over Gaza has caused heavy casualties. Reports are still increasing the numbers. Estimates go to more than 80.
Israel blockaded Gaza totally from March 2 and has allowed inadequate food in since May 19. The resultant famine is becoming lethal, and the various international agencies are protesting loudly. An AP story archive.is/KKhGy (which reports ‘at least’ 25 dead killed today) notes
“The U.N. World Food Program says… nearly 100,000 women and children are suffering from severe acute malnutrition…..
MedGlobal, a charity working in Gaza, said that five children as young as three months had died from starvation in the past three days. “This is a deliberate and human-made disaster,” said Joseph Belliveau, its executive director.”
A Reuters story archive.is/2WrJM (which reports 72 IDF victims today) has much famine detail:
…doctors say a wave of hunger that has loomed over the enclave for months is now finally crashing down…More than 800 people have been killed in recent weeks trying to reach food, mostly in mass shootings by Israeli soldiers…United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called the situation… a “horror show”. The Norwegian Refugee Council, …said some of its own staff were starving. “There is nothing left,” its director Jan Egeland told Reuters. “Israel is not yielding. They just want to paralyse our work”
AFP stated today turkiyetoday.com/region/afp-warns-that-its-jo
“Since AFP was founded in August 1944, some of our journalists were killed…but there is no record of us ever having had to watch our colleagues starving to death,”
This evening the IDF responded ynetnews.com/article/bkmkzb68eg saying there is no famine and the pictures of starving children are from Yemen.
H/T AP: Palestinians carry sacks of flour unloaded from a humanitarian aid convoy that reached Gaza City from the northern Gaza Strip, Tuesday, July 22, 2025.

White Papers Policy Institute: The Great Replacement in Washington State

/3 Comments/in /by

Since I live next door in Idaho, this is worrisome.

The Great Replacement in Washington State

By Mike Adams

Washington State, known for its lush forests, vibrant tech hubs, and progressive politics, is undergoing a profound demographic transformation that is leaving one of America’s most unique cultural regions at risk of social and political extinction. The rapid diversification of its population, driven by both legal and illegal immigration, is leading to the crumbling of a once prosperous state. Tax collection is faltering while the state government, the pro-replacement state government, is increasing the tax burden on every day Americans. Large American companies are leaving the state and a staggering 12% of all businesses surveyed in Washington have expressed a desire to relocate to neighboring Idaho or other more affordable (read less diverse) parts of the country.

A state that helped to define the pioneer image and self-made man national character of the American people is at risk if the Great Replacement continues.

Demographic Shifts in Washington

Washington State has experienced a steady decline in its foundational American population (non-Hispanic Whites).. According to U.S. Census Bureau data, in 1970, Washington was approximately 94% White. By 2020, this figure had dropped to 63.8%, with projections estimating a further decline to below 60% by 2040. The state’s Hispanic population has grown significantly, rising from 2.1% in 1970 to 13.2% in 2020, while the Asian population increased from 1.9% to 9.2% over the same period. Additionally, the Black population has grown modestly, from 2.1% to 4.4%, and multiracial or “other” racial categories have expanded due to increased immigration and intermixing.

The growth in Washington’s non-White population is concentrated in urban centers like Seattle, Tacoma, and Spokane, but rural areas are also seeing changes. For example, counties like Yakima and Franklin have seen Hispanic populations rise to over 50% and 54%, respectively, driven largely by agricultural labor migration from Latin America.

This demographic shift is not organic but is accelerated by deliberate policy choices at both the state and federal levels.

Moreover the foreign-born population of Washington has swelled at such a consistent pace that integration has become nearly impossible and ethnic enclaves and isolated communities have begun to form in certain regions of the state. In 1970, the foreign origin population of the state—those born abroad plus second generation immigrants, was about 18.7% and 88% of those immigrants were from Europe, Canada, or another Western country. As of 2023, Washington’s foreign born population has risen to 15.5% with 88% of those immigrants being of non-Western origin. A further 6% of the state’s population are children under 18 with immigrant parents. Today Washington’s population is 21% of foreign origin and 88% of non-Western extraction. A remarkable increase and demographic reversal on the situation in 1970.

State Policies Facilitating Demographic Change

The state’s government, one that has been subject to Democratic leadership for decades, has implemented policies that actively encourage immigration and demographic ‘diversification’. Governor Jay Inslee and the state legislature have very proudly made Washington into a “sanctuary state,” with laws like the 2019 Keep Washington Working Act (SB 5497) prohibiting local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities.

This has effectively shielded illegal immigrants from deportation and is likely encouraging further immigration into the state. The state has also embraced programs to resettle so-proclaimed and so-called refugees and asylum seekers. Seattle, in particular, has been a hub for refugee resettlement, with organizations like the International Rescue Committee facilitating the arrival of thousands of migrants from Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia. In 2023 alone, Washington accepted over 2,500 refugees, primarily from Somalia, Afghanistan, and Syria, with many being placed in already strained communities like Tukwila and Kent.

These areas have seen rising crime rates and pressure on public services, yet state officials continue to promote further resettlement. Moreover, Washington’s economic policies incentivize immigration. The state’s booming tech industry, led by companies like Microsoft and Amazon, relies heavily on H-1B visa holders, predominantly from India and China. In 2024, Washington employers sponsored over 15,000 H-1B visas, contributing to the growing Asian demographic. While these workers are often portrayed as essential to economic growth we know that they only displace Americans.

Continues…

ZeroHedge: Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, ‘Cannot Fathom’ How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of ‘Years-Long Coup’

/in /by

Gabbard To Release More Obama Russiagate Files, ‘Cannot Fathom’ How Durham, Mueller Missed Evidence Of ‘Years-Long Coup’

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard says she’ll release more information next week to follow up on her bombshell declassification of documents that show “overwhelming evidence” of the Obama administration laid the groundwork for the years-long Trump-Russia collusion investigation after President Trump won the 2016 election.

“We will be releasing more detailed information about how exactly this took place, and the extent to which this information was sought to be hidden from the American people, hidden from officials who would be in a position to do something about it,” Gabbard told Fox News‘ Maria Bartiromo. “Accountability is essential for the future of our country, for the American people to have any sense of trust in the integrity of our democratic republic.”

“Accountability, action, prosecution, indictments for those who are responsible for trying to steal our democracy is essential for us to make sure that this never happens to our country again,” Gabbard continued.

Gabbard told host Maria Bartiromo; “I really cannot fathom” how special counsels Robert Mueller and John Durham missed evidence of this “years-long coup against President Trump.”

“There is no rational or logical explanation for why they failed,” she said, adding “The only logical conclusion that I can draw in this … is that there was direct intent to cover up the truth about what occurred and who was responsible and the broad network of how this seditious conspiracy was concocted and who exactly was responsible for carrying it out.”

Among other things, Gabbard’s team unearthed a Sept. 12, 2016 intelligence community assessment that “foreign adversaries do not have and will probably not obtain the capabilities to successfully execute widespread and undetected cyber attacks” on election systems.

At the time, Russia was being accused of setting up troll farms and hacking the DNC email servers (Seth who?).

And of course, once legitimized by the Obama administration, a steady stream of leaks suggesting that Russia was behind Trump’s 2016 victory started appearing in the Washington Post and other outlets in “sweeping and systemic fashion.”

Mueller, of course, found ‘insufficient evidence’ that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia, while Durham – appointed by Bill Barr (son of the guy who hired Jeffrey Epstein for a teaching job & then oversaw Epstein’s death as AG) – accomplished nothing more than a strongly worded letter about the FBI’s handling of the Trump-Russia probe.

“I don’t know what excuse there is for those who supposedly investigated this previously, whether it was Durham or others, that they were not able to put together the dots and ultimately show the truth to the American people,” said Gabbard, who then stressed that AG Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel will need to now gather up evidence and decide whether to press charges. (lol. lmao even)

“There must be indictments of those responsible, no matter how powerful they are and were at that time, no matter who was involved in creating this treasonous conspiracy against the American people. They all must be held accountable,” Gabbard continued. “For the American people to have any sense of trust in the integrity of our democratic republic, accountability, action, prosecution, [and] indictments for those who are responsible for trying to steal our democracy is essential for us to make sure that this never happens to our country again.”

Monday in Gaza: .“Male staff and family members were handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint,” the U.N. health agency said “

/in /by

On Monday in Gaza, as if ordered (which they probably were) the IDF suddenly stopped the mass culling of Palestinians trying to get food from food distribution points. There were scatted reports of a few deaths, but not the scores reported daily for many weeks.
I think this was probably due to the unprecedented attention the US MSM gave to the weekend slaughter. This has reverberated on: this morning Drudge had no less than 5 stories, some carried on over from yesterday. A new one was Politico‘s story Gaza killings denounced as ‘disgrace to humanity’ by Belgian king politico.eu/article/gaza-israel-war-belgian-k which added that the EU “top brass’ has said nothing.
Early today the IDF launched a major land and air assault on the central city of Deir el-Balah. Casualty reports are trickling in. UPI in upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2025/07/21/new-Is reports (in the text) that 17 were killed at various locations; the Aljazeera report to which this links, no doubt subsequently updated, says
“The Israeli military killed more than 60 Palestinians, including 11 aid seekers, in attacks across Gaz*a”
Getting full information in this kind of event takes time.
The Neocon **Gatestone Institute* is calling for Aljazeera to be declared a Terrorist Organization, aka shut down. gatestoneinstitute.org/21773/designate-al-jaz. Of course the Israelis could curb lies by allowing foreign Journalists into Gaza.
The Israeli attitude to independent observers appears in AP‘s wrap
apnews.com/article/israel-palestinians-gaza-h

“The World Health Organization said Israeli forces raided its main staff residence in Deir al-Balah…“Male staff and family members were handcuffed, stripped, interrogated on the spot and screened at gunpoint,” the U.N. health agency said “

Pic H/T AP Relatives look at the body of Palestinian child Abdullah al-Rantisi, 11, killed by an Israeli military bombardment, in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip, Monday, July 21, 2025

Westering Sun in Aporia: Woke as Managerial Ideology

/1 Comment/in /by
Excerpts. Missing any analysis of the ethnic aspects of the “hostile managerial regime and its dependent [non-white] clients and  promoted by what “Samuel Huntington described [as] a “concentrated and sustained onslaught” by intellectuals and publicists led to multiculturalism.”
[…] the system is structured around exploiting the core [white] population for the benefit of a hostile managerial regime and its dependent [non-white] clients.
[…] Though largely unforeseen — and never legitimized by democratic mandate — demographic transformation was swiftly rationalized and sanctified through the ideology of multiculturalism. This was presented as a natural extension of the liberal-rational belief that social life should be governed by neutral principles, procedural justice and abstract equality. In truth, multiculturalism represented the culmination of a worldview that had long pathologized in-group preference and delegitimized ancestral identity. By suppressing traditional language rooted in attachment, loyalty and exclusion, liberal rationalism had already disarmed the West’s native populations in the face of a doctrine that presented demographic upheaval as a form of moral progress.
In the 1990s, multiculturalism became entrenched as the dominant ideological framework across the West. Samuel Huntington described how a “concentrated and sustained onslaught” by intellectuals and publicists led to multiculturalism being formally adopted by the Clinton administration, which made “the encouragement of diversity one of its major goals.” Meanwhile in Britain, Tony Blair’s Labour government oversaw a dramatic expansion of immigration, inaugurating an era of demographic transformation. Other Western nations soon followed.
Advocates of multiculturalism presented it as neutral, benevolent and inclusive. Yet from a Machiavellian or realist perspective, it was anything but neutral. In instrumental terms, it sanctified unassimilated minorities, immigrants, and mixed-race individuals by implicitly identifying them as the future of Western nations. The empowerment of these groups — socially, politically and institutionally — was justified at the expense of native majorities.
While formerly marginal groups benefited materially and otherwise from multiculturalism, they were not its architects. Nor did they possess the political or institutional leverage to establish it as a new paradigm for Western civilization. The task of authoring, enforcing and entrenching multiculturalism as state dogma fell to another group entirely: the managerial regime. […]
[If managers, non-whites and collaborators] are abstracted from the social equation, what remains of Western societies largely amounts to the shrinking mass of the traditional population. This “core” or “host” population then emerges as the universal object of exploitation across the West. Predominantly native, often middle or working class, and still retaining residual loyalties to older forms of nationhood, faith and organic order, this group’s economic productivity funds the regime and supports its clients. Its demographic inertia is invoked to justify mass migration, while its defensive political instincts are pathologized as reactionary or extremist. It bears the brunt of taxation, undergoes cultural and demographic displacement, and faces escalating surveillance and censorship. […]
Multiculturalism remained the dominant ideology of Western societies until the mid-2010s. Around 2016, however, something changed, and a more militant successor emerged: the phenomenon now known as “woke”.
[…] In retrospect, 2016 was an inflection point in Western history. Years of growing frustration over mass immigration, cultural dispossession, and the erosion of national identity culminated in two seismic events: the Brexit vote in the UK, and the election of Donald Trump in the US. These embodied the first major mass resistance from native Western populations against globalism, demographic transformation, and cultural subordination.
These events triggered existential anxiety for the managerial regime and its clients. It became clear that the core population still possessed substantial numbers and latent political power; that democratic processes might enable their resurgence; and that the ideological high ground needed immediate fortification. Managerial elites therefore pivoted to woke ideology as a reactionary move, launching a moral crusade designed to embed their ideological regime as a permanent revolution. Their aim was pre-emptive suppression of native resurgence—crushing dissent from the only quarter capable of challenging their ascendancy.
[BLM and other regime-approved identity movements] neutralized the radical potential of credentialed but increasingly desperate white Millennials—precisely those who might otherwise have spearheaded populist resistance. Woke offered them belonging within an elite-coded moral universe and easy access to social status through virtue signalling, activism and ritual denunciation of working-class whites (now stigmatized as racist, backward, and dangerous). Psychologically rewarding, socially prestigious, and intellectually undemanding, woke was the perfect counterfeit for genuine rebellion.

NYTimes’ brief for the defense against DNI Gabbard’s accusations of Obama admin “treasonous conspiracy” against Trump

/in /by

Gabbard interviewed by Maria Bartilomo

Gabbard Claims Obama Administration Tried to Undermine Trump in 2016

Democrats denounced a report issued by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence as politically motivated and error-ridden.

Listen to this article · 5:09 min Learn more
Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, during a cabinet meeting this month. Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence on Friday issued the latest in a series of reports from the Trump administration attempting to undermine the eight-year-old assessment that Russia favored the election of Donald J. Trump in 2016.

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said the information she was releasing showed a “treasonous conspiracy in 2016” by top Obama administration officials to harm Mr. Trump.

Democrats denounced the effort as politically motivated, error-ridden and in contradiction with previous reviews of the assessment.

Representative Jim Himes of Connecticut, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, called Ms. Gabbard’s accusation of treason “baseless.”

The Obama administration assessment never contended that Russian hackers manipulated votes.

Russia also conducted influence operations to change public opinion. That included using fake social media posts to sow division among Americans and leaking documents stolen from the Democratic National Committee to denigrate Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee.

Multiple reviews, including a Republican-led Senate report, backed the findings of American spy agencies in late 2016 that Russia was trying to influence the election by damaging Ms. Clinton’s campaign and bolstering Mr. Trump.

Among the Republican senators on the Intelligence Committee that produced the various reports on Russian influence operations was Marco Rubio of Florida, now the secretary of state.

The new report by Ms. Gabbard’s staff conflates those two activities by the Russians and tries to suggest that the Obama administration forced the intelligence community to alter its conclusions.

The findings by Ms. Gabbard’s office highlighted an email from an assistant to a previous director of national intelligence, James Clapper, that said President Barack Obama was seeking a new assessment of the “tools Moscow used and actions it took to influence the 2016 election.”

Still, it has long been known that Mr. Obama had tasked intelligence officials to review the material they had collected and report what they had learned before he left office. At the time, Obama administration officials said they worried that the intelligence assessment would be buried when Mr. Trump took over for his first term.

A C.I.A. review released this month took issue with the speed with which that assessment was conducted. The C.I.A. then referred John O. Brennan, the agency’s former director, to the F.B.I. for criminal investigation.

The report released on Friday highlighted that there was “no indication of a Russian threat to directly manipulate the actual vote count,” then contrasted that with the spy agencies’ ultimate conclusion in December 2016 that President Vladimir V. Putin “aspired to help President-elect Trump’s election chances.”

The report focused on a decision intelligence officials made at the time against producing an article for the president’s daily intelligence briefing that would have said that the Russians “did not impact recent U.S. election results by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.”

“This is one more example of the director of national intelligence trying to cook the books,” Mr. Warner said. “We’re talking about apples and oranges. The Russians were not successful at manipulating our election infrastructure, nor did we say they were.”

The influence operations that the intelligence community reported, and the Senate Intelligence Committee studied extensively, were a different effort, he said.

Mr. Warner noted that as recently as March, the intelligence community reported that Russia had continued its malign influence efforts to sow dissent in the West. The report found that “Moscow probably believes information operations efforts to influence U.S. elections are advantageous,” and that undermining the integrity of American elections was a key goal.

“They acknowledged that Russia’s effort to meddle goes on. That was an assessment under her watch,” he said, referring to Ms. Gabbard.

Mr. Warner said his committee examined the effort to produce the intelligence assessment in December 2016 and found no attempt by Mr. Obama or senior officials to manipulate the findings.

Julian E. Barnes covers the U.S. intelligence agencies and international security matters for The Times. He has written about security issues for more than two decades.

David E. Sanger covers the Trump administration and a range of national security issues. He has been a Times journalist for more than four decades and has written four books on foreign policy and national security challenges.

Andrew Anglin: Bonus Trump Gift to Democrats: A Browner America

/3 Comments/in /by

Dear MAGA: If You Think Masked ICE Thugs Wouldn’t Do the Same to You, You’re Even Dumber Than You Look

…

Another fact that is rather important in my view is that most of these people we see being arrested are not being deported at all. The BBB does nothing to address the laws that make it virtually impossible to deport 98% of illegal immigrants. Getting rid of the laws that prevent deportations should and would be the first move of anyone who was even remotely serious about deporting tens of millions of people. Among other things, you would expand expedited removals, end “credible fear” interviews for “asylum seekers,” and defund immigration courts. This could all be done by Congress.

Of course, the idea of tens of millions of people via mass roundups is completely nonsensical on its face. No one knows the actual numbers, but after the 20+ million who likely came in under Biden, we are definitely talking about somewhere in the range of fifty million illegal immigrants we want to remove. You are not going to pick them up one at a time in the Walmart parking lot. You don’t need to be a math genius to understand this, and I don’t need to tell you “how many football stadiums is 50 million people?”

What you would do is start seriously punishing people who hire or rent to illegal immigrants. You would fully implement E-verify, to ensure people who work and rent are legal residents, then you would send ICE to round up the tens of thousands of people who are employing and renting to illegals and charging them with ten years in prison for each instance. You would then set up ICE-run “no questions asked, just sign the form and we’ll give you $1,000 in cash and put you on a bus back to Mexico or on a flight to wherever” voluntary deportation centers in every major American city and provide a hotline for the immigrants to call explaining how they can make their way out.

If they can’t legally work and they can’t legally live anywhere, all of a sudden you have an exodus. What can they do? They have to leave. Then, instead of endless videos of masked men grabbing screaming women in church parking lots and throwing them into vans, you’d have endless videos of immigrants lining up and boarding single-file onto buses bound for Mexico.

I’m sure it’s possible to argue that some of the immigrants would refuse to leave even if they could not work and had to live on the streets. But it’s not going to be very many of them, and those ones could be thrown in vans. They’re not going to be hard to find.

Tens of millions of people have been relocated before. The most obvious example to point to is the partitioning of Pakistan. That project used carrots and sticks, but it did not round millions of people up, throwing them in cars one at a time, sending three officers to arrest a single individual.

How long does the arrest take, if we include drive time and paperwork? How much are these ICE people being paid per hour? This all starts to become reminiscent of “Holocaust math,” no?

Far from moving to arrest the employers and landlords of illegals, which I suspect many in the Trump administration would view as antisemitic, Trump has not even managed to cut off illegal immigrant access to all of the free social services.

Even if you are not big on math and are a true believer in the “one arrest at a time” strategy, the problem now is that ICE has already cleaned out the “100 miles from the border” immigrants who have been here less than two weeks (those are the only people eligible for expedited removal), and now these people are just being interned indefinitely as the courts prevent deportation. Yes, the Trump administration is making a big show pushing back on the courts, Stephen Miller is saying they don’t have the authority, but whatever the details of that battle might be, most of these people being detained by ICE are no longer being deported and are instead being sent to detainment facilities. Meanwhile, there is not even a discussion of using the Congress to pass laws stripping courts of their ability to prevent deportations. The United States federal court system is still able to enforce international refugee treaties (HIAS and others successfully challenged Trump’s EO on the matter in court), and instead of using the Congress to get rid of these treaties, Trump sends Miller to argue with the courts about what they mean.

Just Send Them to Black Sites, Indefinitely?

This “Alligator Alcatraz,” where MAGA patriots plan to eat delicious bread while watching Mexicans being eaten alive by large lizards, is a “black site.” That is, it is a prison camp where people are held indefinitely without access to due process. Just to be clear, no, it does not have to be secret to be a “black site.” Guantanamo Bay, where Trump is also sending immigrants instead of deporting them (he’s allowed to do this because Gitmo is technically US soil), is the world’s most famous prison and is also, definitionally, a “black site.” That said, it is certainly often a feature of a black site that you do not know where it is, and if you imagine that the federal government is not using this current circus atmosphere to build these sites across the country, you are as innocent as a babe or as stupid as an ox who’s suffered severe head trauma.

If the illegals could simply be deported in an efficient manner, you would not have any reason to build new black sites. So there is one more reason the state has for not successfully deporting illegal immigrants. That’s on top of the fact that all wealthy donors are against mass deportation of illegals.

Along with a brand new army of fully militarized federal cops trained to drive around the country and disappear people into vans in broad daylight, these black sites are another thing that the Trump Administration will be gifting to the AOC administration when James “JD Vance” Bowman loses the 2028 election.

I’m sure the Democrats will campaign on abolishing (or at least restricting) ICE and closing the black sites. And I’m sure people will believe it because of the long established Democrat tradition of telling the truth and never using federal cops for immoral purposes.

The most important gift Trump will give to AOC will be an AI police state control grid run by Palantir, so that the government will be able to keep close tabs on racists, sexists, homophobes, transphobes, and most importantly of all, antisemites.

Will the Democrats use this series of gifts to identify, arrest, and detain all the people viewed as a threat to democracy? Of course, I have no way of predicting such a thing, all I can do is say that it would be very easy to do, given these incredible gifts Trump will be giving them, and could be done legally with a simple emergency declaration which could be declared for more or less any reason.

Here’s an interesting question: how many people would need to be disappeared into some cage in a swamp to crush a meaningful American resistance movement? We know that the Palantir system will be able to identify them, and I would suspect the number is lower than 2,500. It could in fact be much lower than that, given that a fully functioning controlled opposition movement already exists, and most people would prefer to follow a Pied Piper offering them some joyful fantasy than look upon the dark realty of what is actually happening in front of their eyes. A quick perusal of the ridiculous popularity of the QAnon movement should be enough to demonstrate the ability of people to put their faith in nonsense, and most of the controlled opposition movements are nowhere near as ridiculous as QAnon.

Personally, I think these street scenes of ICE agents grabbing people are being created to desensitize people to seeing this sort of thing, and I think it is only a matter of time before these methods are used against those viewed as “dissidents” in America. But, hey – maybe I’m wrong? Maybe I’m just paranoid and it’s just that everyone in the government is really bad at math?

Bonus Trump Gift to Democrats: A Browner America

Along with the “elite police state package,” there are a lot of bonus gifts Trump is giving the Democrats. For example, Trump has decided to make it look like he’s implicated in the Epstein documents by claiming they don’t exist, and Democrats can now claim he destroyed them all. This is fantastic news for a lot of Democrat politicians and donors. You could come up with a big list of all sorts of little presents like this Trump will be giving the Democrats in the 2028 handoff.

But given today’s topic of discussion, the most relevant of the bonus gifts Trump will be giving the Democrats is a browner America. Homeland Security claims that virtually no one is crossing the border illegally currently. That seems unlikely, but okay. DHS also claims that as of June, so in Trump’s first six months, they had deported 207,000 people. The goal the administration had set was to deport a million per year, and it looks like in 2025 they might get close to 500,000, half of their 1 million goal. For reference, the Biden administration was probably allowing about 5 million people a year to enter the country, while in 2024, that administration deported only 270,000.

Given that Trump is going for all of the low-hanging fruit in his first months in office – new arrivals who are near the border – and given that there has been no interest shown in using Congress to change any of the laws, and especially given that there is no interest in putting the onus of responsibility on the people hiring and renting to the illegals, it is unlikely that by their 4th year, they will be deporting more than Biden was in his fourth year.

So just to be clear: Biden allowed in 20 millionish, Trump says the goal is to deport 4 millionish, he will probably end up deporting 1.5 millionish. Even after building and arming the biggest federal police agency in history, there is no way he is going to get near Obama’s deportation numbers.

Again, no need for a math whiz to see that just with white deaths and brown births alone, the 2028 America Trump hands off is going to be significantly browner than the 2024 America Biden handed him. But we haven’t added the legal immigrants. That’s about 1 million new people per year, virtually all of them brown. Further, Trump is at least flirting with the idea of removing caps on H-1B visas for Indians, which could mean multi-millions more per year.

Any way you cut it, 2028 America is going to be significantly browner than 2024 America, and it could be a lot browner.

But hey, I heard on Fox News that brown people are leaving the Democrat plantation because of the woke agenda. So maybe it will all work out? Maybe brown folks will get sick of paying these high taxes to people who want to turn their kids gay, and we’ll have a… multiracial working class uprising against the… the woke mob.

Or whatever.

But Hey, Whatever

Many in the internet will claim that a person has no right to identify a problem unless he has already prepared a solution for it. It is difficult to imagine a more infantile mindset for a grown adult man to embrace. But who am I to judge? I simply do my best to look at the world, to examine the facts, and try to explain what is going on to those interested in listening. I would never want to force anyone to listen. You are an adult, and you have a basic right as a human being to believe whatever it is you feel like believing.

I do not have a solution to the very serious problems I am identifying here, and will not even suggest that any such solution exists. I’m just exhausted by this goofy fantasy bullshit. In 2016, Trump said tens of millions of people needed to be deported. He “lost” in 2020, and tens of millions more were brought in before he “won” in 2024, and now he’s aiming to deport 4 million by 2028, and it seems that number is impossible, but you are going to get a massive police state, both digital and physical, in exchange for removing maybe 1.5-2 million illegal immigrants.

Okay?

That’s what’s happening. Happening alongside the endless wars, the biggest budget ever, the entire Epstein case being thrown into a black hole, and whatever other cute little surprises the Trump administration has up its sleeve over the next 3.5 years. It’s all bad news. So if you want, pretend it’s not happening. No one forced you to read this. At least, I hope they didn’t. If someone did force you to read this, I’m sorry. If it was a Mexican who forced you to read it, you should call ICE, and they will come feed him to an alligator.

When analyzing the American empire, and the evils it is currently in the process of spreading, I’ve determined that a man can either hope that the American empire falls sooner rather than later, or that he dies before things get really bad.

The other thing one can do is pray for incompetence on the part of the evil forces implementing this agenda, but I suppose that falls under the “hoping for collapse” category.

When Trump was allegedly shot in the ear in Butler, I identified this as part of a program to set him up as an overwhelmingly popular leader, who would come into office as a kind of Caesar figure, and be able to do whatever he wanted to do. Unfortunately or fortunately, most of that good will has already been burned through. The Epstein thing was incredible. To actually start yelling about how people need to stop talking about Epstein was beyond my comprehension.

That was just so completely nuts. When I first saw it, I had to confirm it wasn’t AI.

And then this?

As I always note, we live in a democracy. Please don’t say “oh no, we live in a Republic.” Some of you people are just such retards, I really feel like you deserve all of this. Sometimes, I think the Jews are right about the goyim. We do live in a democracy, a representative democratic republic, and this means that you do not have a way to petition grievances. So the government can do whatever they want to you.

However, at some point, any population facing a certain amount of abuse will engage in a violent uprising, so the system is able to move much more smoothly when they have high levels of support. The fact that Trump has burned up so much good will so quickly is confusing and can only really be explained by incompetence on his part and on the part of his cadre. He doesn’t actually have to do anything. He can just pretend he’s trying to do something. But coming out and saying “we must defeat Putin and actually Epstein didn’t even do anything” is really wild.

So sure. Hope their incompetence screws everything up and leads to a collapse. That’s my best advice.

My best advice is actually to leave the United States, and forget the place exists. But most people are not going to do that.