Silence Means Violence: How Censorship Leads Inexorably to Dead Whites

Another day in Brave New Britain, another Muslim rape-gang is convicted and another set of ugly, alien, melanin-enriched faces stare out from news-reports. But not for long. As Douglas Murray spotted in 2018, the leftist media are now determined that these stories should disappear as soon as possible. After all, in 2017 a White idiot called Darren Osborne drove a car at worshippers outside a mosque in London, killing one man and injuring twelve others because he had been “radicalized” by Tommy Robinson and angered by a BBC drama about Muslim “grooming gangs” in the Lancashire town of Rochdale.

The ugly, alien, melanin-enriched faces of a Muslim rape-gang from Rotherham

That, for leftists, was proof that the choice for society is clear: it’s either silence or violence. Either we cover up Muslim imperfections as much as possible or evil, bigoted Whites will rise up and kill Muslims. The Sudanese-British journalist Nesrine Malik has laid out the official line in the Guardian and attacked “The myth of the free speech crisis.” According to Malik, free speech must be used only for “challenging upwards,” not for “punching downwards” and “attacking the weak and persecuted.” She asserts that “Our alleged free speech crisis was never really about free speech. The backdrop to the myth is rising anti-immigration sentiment and Islamophobia. Free-speech-crisis advocates always seem to have an agenda. They overwhelmingly wanted to exercise their freedom of speech in order to agitate against minorities, women, immigrants and Muslims.”

Nesrine Malik Is Punching Up At You

So shut up, you White male bigots! If you criticize non-Whites, you’re punching down and should be silenced. If non-Whites criticize you, they’re punching up and should be celebrated. What could be simpler? But I see a big flaw in Nesrine Malik’s arguments on behalf of “minorities, women, immigrants and Muslims.” Although she is definitely on the side of Muslims and immigrants, I don’t think she is on the side of women. Darren Osborne, who came from the White majority, killed one Muslim from the non-White minority. But it’s clear that non-Whites are far more likely to kill and otherwise harm Whites than vice versa.

“Groomed” at 12, murdered at 17

Non-Whites are a particular danger to White women. As the judge at the most recent rape-gang trial has said, the Labour council and police in Rotherham “had been aware vulnerable teenagers in [Rotherham] were being targeted for sexual exploitation more than a decade ago.” The council and police decided that silence and censorship were the best responses to the flourishing rape-culture of Muslims. And so a White girl called Laura Wilson was “groomed” for sex at the age of 12, then brutally murdered by two Muslim men at the age of 17. She was stabbed repeatedly, then thrown into a canal to die.

In Telford, another small English town heavily enriched by Muslims, the same pattern played out. The authorities preferred silence and censorship about Muslim rape-gangs, not publicity and prosecution. And so a White girl called Lucy Lowe was “groomed” at 13 and murdered at 16 along with her mother and 17-year-old sister. They were burned alive when a Muslim called Azhar Ali Mehmood set fire to their house. Wherever Muslims and other non-Whites have emigrated in the West, they have murdered Whites and wrecked the lives of White girls and women. This has been going on for decades and the response of the authorities has always been the same: silence and censorship.

Rape-culture in Sudan

The internet began to change that, allowing Whites to discuss and challenge the pathologies introduced to their nations by mass immigration. But Nesrine Malik and other leftists hate that free discussion. They want silence and censorship to reign again. Yes, non-Whites must be allowed to criticise Whites openly and endlessly, but Whites cannot be allowed to criticize non-Whites. After all, I’m such a bigot that I think Sudanese immigrants like Nesrine Malik are bad for the West. And the only things I’ve got on my side are facts and endless stories of crimes committed by Sudanese people. For example, rape-culture is so bad in Sudan that both men and women were raped by security forces during recent unrest in the capital Khartoum. And it’s not surprising that Sudanese bring their rape-culture with them when they emigrate to the West. A Sudanese rapist left a woman with “horrific life-changing injuries, including a ‘shattered’ skull and bleeding to the brain” in the English city of Leicester in 2018. And three Sudanese “asylum seekers” committed a gang-rape in Huddersfield in the same year. In 2019, another Sudanese “asylum seeker” improved on that vibrant tradition by “savagely murder[ing] a 21-year-old [White] woman” in Leeds “after she refused to have sex with him.”

Nesrine Malik poses as a feminist, but does not discuss stories like that or explore the way in which emigration from Third-World countries with violent, misogynist cultures will inevitably mean raped, maimed and murdered White women in the First World. After all, exposing Sudanese rape-culture would be “punching downwards” and “attacking the weak and persecuted.” And let’s be fair: Sudanese culture isn’t just about rape. Steve Sailer has chronicled how Sudanese emigrants have enriched Australia with violent crime and gang warfare. And an enterprising Sudanese mother and son have defrauded Australian tax-payers of six million dollars. You can find lots more stories of the vibrancy Sudanese emigrants have brought to the West. That’s why I reach the bigoted conclusion that they aren’t good for the West and should go back where they came from.

Lucrative careers of anti-White agitation

Nesrine Malik won’t agree, of course. She doesn’t want to go back to Sudan because it’s what Donald Trump would hatefully — and accurately — call “a shithole.” The natives of Sudan have low average intelligence and the only things that flourish there are corruption, oppression and violence. Although Malik herself is from the right-hand side of the Sudanese bell-curve, she isn’t an original or interesting writer. Nor is Afua Hirsch, a half-Jewish, half-Ghanaian Guardian journalist who pursues the same lucrative career of endlessly criticizing Whites, blaming White racism for all non-White failure, and demanding that Whites be censored and silenced.

Half-Black, Half-Jew, Afua Hirsch Is Hating You

The White journalist Rod Liddle, a fearless anti-PC warrior and unashamed Islamophobe, has noted that many people “are sick to the back teeth of this egregious illiberal shite, this closing down of debate, this hair-trigger sensitivity.” But Liddle has never discussed where “this egregious illiberal shite” came from. To do that he would have to break a strict taboo of his own and criticize the only minority that he himself regards as sacred. But let’s do what anti-PC warriors like Rod Liddle and Mark Steyn never do. Let’s ask a simple question: Who wrote the anti-White script for unoriginal, uninspired non-White journalists like Nesrine Malik and Afua Hirsch?

Britain’s Chief Rabbi answered that question in 2007:

Sacks: Multiculturalism threatens democracy

Multiculturalism promotes segregation, stifles free speech and threatens liberal democracy, Britain’s top Jewish official warned in extracts from [a recently published] book … Jonathan Sacks, Britain’s chief rabbi, defined multiculturalism as an attempt to affirm Britain’s diverse communities and make ethnic and religious minorities more appreciated and respected. But in his book, The Home We Build Together: Recreating Society, he said the movement had run its course. “Multiculturalism has led not to integration but to segregation,” Sacks wrote in his book, an extract of which was published in the Times of London.

“Liberal democracy is in danger,” Sacks said, adding later: “The politics of freedom risks descending into the politics of fear.” Sacks said Britain’s politics had been poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment. The process, he said, began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays. He said the effect had been “inexorably divisive.” “A culture of victimhood sets group against group, each claiming that its pain, injury, oppression, humiliation is greater than that of others,” he said. In an interview with the Times, Sacks said he wanted his book to be “politically incorrect in the highest order.” (Sacks: Multiculturalism threatens democracy, The Jerusalem Post, 20th October 2007)

Arch-Anti-Semite Jonathan Sacks with Tony Blair

“The progress began with Jews,” according to the arch-anti-semite Jonathan Sacks. He’s right. But it’s precisely because Jews are the originators of “this egregious illiberal shite, this closing down of debate, this hair-trigger sensitivity” that so few people will dare to say so. Jews devised and popularized “identity politics” for their own benefit: to undermine White society and to place themselves beyond criticism. Jews are a tiny minority who wield huge financial, political and cultural power. That’s why they want to place themselves beyond scrutiny and criticism. Power that can’t be discussed is also power that can’t be challenged. Jews believe fervently in minority-worship because they see themselves as the supreme minority.

A never-ending blood-tax

And by forcing Whites to tolerate the pathologies of Muslims and other non-Whites, they reassure themselves that Whites are passive and will not act in their own interests. To Jews, the deaths of Laura Wilson, Lucy Lowe, Mary-Ann Leneghan, Christina Edkins, Kriss Donald and countless other White men, women and children are a small price to pay for Jewish peace-of-mind. Indeed, they’re not a price at all, because Jews aren’t paying it.

The ADL Are Censoring You

To me those deaths are an intolerable price, a never-ending blood-tax on Whites who never voted for mass immigration and have consistently opposed the invasion and colonization of their homelands. As the hate-blogger Chateau Heartiste points out: “Diversity + Promixity = War.” Nesrine Malik would no doubt be delighted to learn that Heartiste was thrown off WordPress as part of the on-going purge of hate. But this is because “Truth is hate to those who hate the truth.” And the biggest haters of truth are Jewish organizations like the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) in America, the Community Security Trust (CST) in Britain and the Ligue Internationale Contre le Racisme et l’Antisémitisme (LICRA) in France.

Pro-White views are very bad news

It’s no surprise that those Jewish organizations are also dedicated supporters of mass immigration by anti-White, pro-censorship non-Whites like Nesrine Malik. Free speech is a rare and fragile phenomenon that was created very recently by White men in north-western Europe. It depends on a unique combination of intelligence, objectivity, humility and self-control. Unlike White science and White technology, free speech has never been successfully exported to the non-White world — not to high-IQ China and certainly not to low-IQ Sudan.

And when the non-White world comes flooding into the White world, free speech inevitably begins to die. With free speech, Whites can defend their own interests and resist the destruction of their nations. Without it, they’re disarmed and helpless. That’s precisely why those who hate Whites also hate free speech. Nesrine Malik is an obvious example, but she’s a symptom of the death of free speech, not a cause. For the cause, you need to look at the ADL, CST and LICRA. To Jews, pro-White views are very bad news.

50 replies
  1. Denny Stanley
    Denny Stanley says:

    It’s white men’s obligation to protect their women and children and their white nations against all foreign invaders, forced upon them by the European Union. It’s all right to be white in all the great white nations we created.

    Reply
    • Andrea Daley Utronebel
      Andrea Daley Utronebel says:

      True, but the problem is peace and prosperity and PC and Pop Culture (where the Other is so cool and badass) turned so many white boys into worthless whiggaz or hipsters and turned too many white women into anti-white harridans or jungle-feverish skanks.

      Reply
  2. Tony
    Tony says:

    Dear Tobias,
    I found your article to be one of the more insightful on a site with a reputation for being insightful. It is unfortunately difficult to get the message across to the majority of our fellow “Whites.” I read a book called “Prolonging the Agony: How the Anglo-American Establishment prolonged World War One by Three and a Half Years. Of course you know which ethnicity dominates that Establishment? I find I get a reaction from Whites when they realize that their sons and daughters are being sent overseas to have bits blown off them. It seems to be more difficult to get a reaction on the immigration angle from my countrymen.

    Reply
    • PaleoAtlantid
      PaleoAtlantid says:

      Allow me to mention, though you are probably aware, that there is a ‘prequel’ to the book you mention, also by the same authors titled, “Hidden History The Secret Origins of the First World War”. The JQ is not adequately addressed but the book provides a solid foundation for more research.
      The book’s dedication is to “The victims of an unspeakable evil”.

      Reply
      • Tony
        Tony says:

        Thank you for the reply. I read Hidden History: Secret Origins of the First World War a few years before I read Prolonging the Agony. I consider both to be outstanding works, though as you noted, the JQ is not addressed explicitly. However, you don’t have to be Einstein (pun intended) to know whose interests Lord Milner and his cohorts were ultimately serving. I did wonder if the JQ was deliberately left out, but would not hold that against the authors as the material they succeeded in publishing is invaluable. As you are obviously well read, may I enquire if you have read John Robison’s 1798 Proofs of a Conspiracy and Nesta Webster’s 1921 World Revolution: The Plot Against Civilization?

        Regards

        Ps Harry Elmer Barnes 1926 The Genesis of the War provides support to Hidden History though it can be difficult to procure an original copy.

        Reply
  3. Denny Stanley
    Denny Stanley says:

    As a white man I can look at a Muslim man and I know we’re not brothers, I can look at a Black man and I know we’re not brothers, I can look at a Asian man and I know we’re not brothers, I can look at a Hispanic man and know we’re not brothers, and I can look at Jewish man and I definitely know we’re not brothers. I can look at any white man from any white nation and he doesn’t even speak English and I know he’s my brother and we can work together to make a better future for all our white nations, and even non white nations. No, white nation’s have to be white nations. We have to protect and nurture our on white stock.

    Reply
  4. Franklin Ryckaert
    Franklin Ryckaert says:

    “…Sacks said Britain’s politics had been poisoned by the rise of identity politics, as minorities and aggrieved groups jockeyed first for rights, then for special treatment. The process, he said, began with Jews, before being taken up by blacks, women and gays. He said the effect had been “inexorably divisive…”

    So by criticizing aggrieved identity politics as begun with Jews, is rabbi Sacks a “good guy” being on our side? Hardly, otherwise he would not participate in a conference of leading Jews to strengthen international Jewry with on its advisory board, besides himself and Lord Jacob Rothschild no other than BARBARA SPECTRE from Sweden, that notorious Jewess who advocated for Jews to take a leading role in “multiculturalizing Europe”.

    See : Prnewswire, september 9, 2019 : Leading Jewish Thinkers And Activists From Six Continents Convene In Jerusalem To Launch Effort To Achieve Unified Vision For Global Jewry.
    https://www.prnewswire.com>news-releases.leading-

    Reply
  5. Sidney Secular
    Sidney Secular says:

    The book, “The Strange Death of Europe” by Douglas Murray provides a good summary of what’s happening to Europe except that it gives the usual suspects a pass.

    Reply
  6. RobertDolan
    RobertDolan says:

    White man says, “Jews have too much power,” equals anti-semitism.

    Jew says, “Whites have too much power,” equals sociology.

    Reply
  7. milan
    milan says:

    Had a conversation with a friend white who talked about moving to Europe due to a family member having some land in Italy. We talked some about Britain and the disaster it has become and he agreed and said he had some Moslem friends in Winnipeg who left Britain. As he tells it they said everyday my children aged 12 and 13 were beat up after school. Everyday?

    It is frightening to say the least what is occurring over there and for me after watching this video by Paul Watson about the degeneracy I am floored truly floored. https://youtu.be/gK_0Yo-0r08

    What is especially frightening however, is abortion is treated as a contraceptive? Really? this is the first I have ever heard of this. At the 17 mark Watson talks about a fetish that exists where couples purposely get pregnant to enjoy sex more and then abort the child and start over again. One couple apparently has done this seven times?

    I am deeply afraid if this is true is it any wonder climate change is on everyone’s mind in England. Read and weep for not only yourselves but more so your children:

    “Rain will come in torrents, and I will send hailstones hurtling down, and violent winds will burst forth. When the wall collapses, will people not ask you, “Where is the whitewash you covered it with?”
    “Therefore this is what the Sovereign Lord says: In my wrath I will unleash a violent wind, and in my anger hailstones and torrents of rain will fall with destructive fury.” (Ezekiel 13:11–13)

    “The word of the Lord came to me: “Son of man, if a country sins against me by being unfaithful and I stretch out my hand against it to cut off its food supply and send famine upon it and kill its people and their animals, even if these three men—Noah, Daniel and Job—were in it, they could save only themselves by their righteousness, declares the Sovereign Lord.” (Ezekiel 14:12–14)

    Remember that crop circle folks on the Crabwood Farmhouse on August 15, 2002? A crop- circle of a computer disk and characters which decoded read what?

    “Beware the bearers of false gifts and their broken promises. Much pain but still time. There is good out there. We oppose deception. Conduit closing.”

    Much pain but still time? Time? Time for what exactly? Well, repentance and confession of course for all this violence and sin. God was and is communicating. Message is biblical! Any with the most basic grade level knowledge of the bible can clearly see that. And now look Hailstones and Wind and even severe heat, just more and more pain yes?

    Wake up before it too late folks!!!!!

    Reply
  8. Abel Wolfgang
    Abel Wolfgang says:

    I’ll comment on this article and again most likely my comment won’t be published.
    Maybe all these problems aren’t because of some secret plot against whites. Just maybe all these things are happens no because we’ve turned our back to God and now our enemies will be allowed to overrun us.
    Yeah we can rid our homelands of all blacks, Muslims, and Jews, but what good is it if we allow our people to be lgbt freaks, sodomites, and filthy feminists?
    We’re are weak as a culture and people because of sin. We don’t fight the sodomite. How will we ever fight the Muslim?

    Reply
  9. Andrew
    Andrew says:

    After several years of being able to watch YouTube videos and post comments, I recently tried to log in to YouTube and was told that I had been “permanently banned”.

    This was right after it was announced that in the previous three months, YouTube had banned 17,000 content providers, taken down 100,000 videos, and deleted 500 million comments.

    That’s right — 500 million.

    Does YouTube really think it’s going to keep its users happy by doing that? Does it think that its conservative-leaning users won’t find YouTube to be a bore now that they can’t produce content or even make comments?

    Now, I had never produced any content on YouTube. All I ever did was watch videos and make comments. YouTube’s explanation for my being banned was that I was producing “hateful content”, but I wasn’t producing any content. When I pointed that out to YouTube, they didn’t respond.

    So I decided to do a little purge of my own, and I recommend that others do the same.

    YouTube (run by a Jew) is owned by Google (founded by two Jews), or rather, they are both owned by Alphabet (owned by the same two Jews). I had a gmail account through Google. I canceled it. I also canceled my Facebook (created by a Jew) account, which I had never used and had only created so that I could make a comment on a news story that required all comments to be made through Facebook.

    I also canceled my Twitter account (which I never used) and made sure that I no longer had an account with PayPal. I also resolved to no longer buy anything through Amazon.

    All of these companies are engaged in censorship and most if not all of them are relying on the Jewish ADL and the Jewish SPLC — along with the University of California at Berkeley’s “D Lab” — to flag “hateful” content and develop algorithms to prevent “hate”.

    Of course, other companies are involved, directly or indirectly: Apple, Microsoft, Dell (its Jewish founder leads a group that seeks to stop “hate”). Also J.P. Morgan Chase, which denied a bank account to a Trump supporter. And let’s not forget Mozilla (Firefox), which fired its CEO because he opposed gay marriage (never mind that Obama and Hillary had opposed it only a couple of years earlier).

    When I replace my computer (so far I’ve heard nothing bad about Intel and IBM, so I’ll stick with them), I expect to have a range of choices that I don’t have now because my computer is old.

    These tech companies and their allies need to die. I am going to do my part in making that happen. Of course, I don’t read newspapers, go to see new movies, or watch TV anymore, for much the same reason.

    Reply
    • bruno
      bruno says:

      Dear Sir:

      Your posts are greatly enjoyed. Thank you.

      Of course, what you imply is correct. Censorship is a fact and the innuendo of free speech is worst than a sick joke.

      No need to comment on all those transnational Z anti-majority conglomerates that you’ve touched. That’s been covered all over Western society.

      A first step in the dilemma of EuroMan’s civilization is how to alter the voting fiasco. Yet, even if that is solved how is a 40 mln population relocated in Amdom? You see, as you know, several million have been indoctrinated and are (thus) themselves anti-majorityites.

      Further, even if sanctuary cities were dissolved and the Wall erected the carcinoma within EuroMan’s body has metastasized to all nearly organs. Just think of US City States, Sweden, Western Germany, London, Paris…

      Reply
      • moneytalks
        moneytalks says:

        Thanks for the heads-up .

        I wonder if they will put a hidden secret access circuit in their CPUs ?

        They would’nt do that . . . would they ?

        Reply
    • Denny Stanley
      Denny Stanley says:

      There’s three things that the jew fears the most.
      1) The jew fears having his penis cut off
      2) The jew fears not having no money or power.
      3) They jew fears that Jesus was the messiah and he will make heaven on earth.
      The easiest way to stop the jew, is to stop making him rich and powerful. Why would you buy anything from someone who wants to destroy you. The jew depends on white people to make him wealthy and powerful. Research everything before you buy it. If you cut the jew off from his money supply, he’ll run around in circles like a chicken with his head cut off.

      Reply
      • TJ
        TJ says:

        jew makes his own money supply. The problem is not buying from jews, rather it is selling to jews. jew fake money gets value from White creators accepting it. Something is given up in return for nothing.

        White wealth must be kept in the White Community for use by Whites only. Selling to non-Whites is a crime. Giving free stuff to non-Whites is a crime.

        Reply
      • Rerevisionist
        Rerevisionist says:

        You’re making a big mistake about jewish money. A common one, which of course jews encourage.
        .
        You think if you spend somewhere else you’ll deprive jews. BUT they have a policy of owning land and screwing out money for it. Unless you want to live on the street, very many people have to pay rent. AND they have a policy of controlling taxation. In many ways they get money from taxes, direct, indirect, special, on life, death, whatever. INCIDENTALLY the rent process was used by the Church in its ‘great days’ and imho churches had a tacit agreement with jews over rents, money, and careers in the Church.
        . . . And (sigh) Jews can print money via the Fed, and electronically, and getting hold of gold and other valuables.
        . . . Something far more serious than spening in a non-Jew mall (if you can find one) is needed. There have been articles in the OccidntalObserver – oh, wait, no, there never have been.

        Reply
    • Tim Heydon
      Tim Heydon says:

      YouTube and Facebook etc are on borrowed time. They make their money by harvesting the personal details of their users and selling them.

      But Sir Tim Berbers-Lee, the inventor of the World Wide Web is developing a blockchain-type system which will mean that every individual user will own their own details.

      This could mean that every individual will be able to sell their information rather than having it taken for free. This is going to be devastating for these big tech companies, They are already seeing competition from other platforms which are growing in popularity.

      Perhaps the blatant political bias of big tech was a factor in the decline in use of Facebook by 50% in the U.K. over the latest 12-month period.

      Reply
    • Titus
      Titus says:

      Intel is adding hardware backdoors in every chip they manufacture, so some jew in Israel can have unrestricted access to everything in your computer. If you knew how bad things really are…

      Reply
    • Andrew
      Andrew says:

      Barbara: Thanks for the Intel tip. I meant to say HP. But, in truth, they’re all compromised.

      Titus and Trenchant. Yes, Israel has cyber “back doors” not only into our high technology, but our banking, credit card processing, national defense, intelligence services, vital infrastructure, social media, etc.

      Unit 8200 and the Talpiot Program unite our intelligence services and corporate and government cybersecurity with Mossad and the IDF (Israeli Defense Force). Just add Israel’s rogue nuclear program and nuclear submarines, and — as Brendon O’Connell puts it — “Bibi has a kill switch”.

      That kill switch will become even more effective with the development of 5G and the Internet of Things. The world is being turned into an electronic concentration camp controlled by the Jews and their goy minions. Brendon O’Connell and Adam Green (Know More News) are good sources on this, especially O’Connell.

      The United States and Britain, and by extension Europe and all the Anglophone nations, are vassal states of international Jewry and Israel.

      Chabad Lubavitch rabbis are welcomed in the White House and the Kremlin on a regular basis.

      Israel hedges its bets not only through its relations with Russia but its relations with China as well. The “Belt and Road Initiative” is Israel’s insurance policy against potential Western hostility, just as the West is Israel’s insurance policy against potential Eastern hostility..

      Menasseh ben Israel’s petition to Oliver Cromwell for the readmission of the Jews to England shows that Jews controlled the world economy as far back as 1651. They began their political takeover of England in the 1690’s with the founding date of the Bank of England. Nathan (“Natty”) Rothschild established his economic supremacy there when Napoleon was defeated by the Duke of Wellington. Jews married into the English aristocracy, at which point they were at liberty to control world events — WW I, WW II, the creation of the State of Israel, etc.

      In the United States, Jews took political and financial control when their puppet Woodrow Wilson was elected in 1913 (the same year that the Jew Paul Warburg designed the Federal Reserve system and Wilson signed the federal income tax act into law).

      From the late 1800s, Britain and the United States became a single united world power, an alliance that continues to this day. What Britain lost after WW II (its colonies) the United States gained in the form of its ability to bully other nations and act as the Jews’ proxy army all over the world.

      The Rothschilds, Cecil Rhodes, the Rockefellers, and J.P. Morgan jointly established “The City” (the financial district of London) and Wall Street as premier centers of world financial power. Ancillary institutions that exert influence, politically and financially, include the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) in Basel, Switzerland, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House, London), the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg Group, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank . All serve as fronts for international Jewish power.

      Russia was taken over by the Jews in 1917-18, and they are still powerful there. Putin surrounds himself with Chabad Lubavitch rabbis, and it is a criminal offense to question the Jewish Holocaust narrative in Russia — as well as in Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic and Slovakia (for those who think that those countries might be free of Jewish influence; they aren’t).

      Communist China? It was created and to a large extent run by Jews, including American Jews.

      Once you know all of this, you will understand that the world has long been controlled by an international oligarchy dominated by Jews. All of the ideological and other conflicts that we see or hear about are largely theater.

      Reply
    • Andrew
      Andrew says:

      I forgot to mention that Israel and American Jews (many of them dual citizens of Israel) did 9/11 and then covered it up. The motive is obvious — wars for Israel . It was easy for them to pull off the attack because they had already taken control of security and communications at the Pentagon, FAA, the airports in question, and the World Trade Center.

      The planes were operated by remote control through a homing device-type system. They were not flown by “hijackers”. Christopher Bollyn is a good source on this, although his books are difficult to get through because he doesn’t organize the information very well.

      Of course, people are perfectly free to believe that a man who lived in a cave and needed regular dialysis did 9/11 — along with Arabs who didn’t know how do take-offs or landings in airplanes.

      They are perfectly free to believe that the whole matter was put to rest when Osama bin Laden was suddenly “found” in Pakistan, summarily executed on the spot (no questioning), and then had his body dumped in the ocean.

      Wasn’t it P.T. Barnum who said “Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public”?

      Reply
  10. Forever Guilty
    Forever Guilty says:

    I enjoying reading articles of mr. Langdon for a long time. However in the beginning of the article phrase “White idiot called Darren Osborne drove a car at worshippers outside a mosque in London, killing one man and injuring twelve others” get me little ”triggered” Perhaps we should not call anybody “White idiot” especially the man who decided to do something to defend his fellow White people?

    Reply
  11. Lucius Vanini
    Lucius Vanini says:

    ANDREW seems to have deleted the very apt reply he made concerning Christianity’s role in allowing, even promoting the Third-World invasion of the West. Well, I’ll confirm what he said–that being Christian hasn’t spared the USA and Europe from alien invasion and that in fact Christian “altruism” and Christian institutions have been arch-enablers of the invasions….

    Nationalists rightly decry the obscenely disproportionate role that Zionistic Jews play in flooding our lands with “migrants,” but what forces have been more culpable than Merkel’s CHRISTIAN Democratic Union and the Europhobic pope’s Vatican? Merkel, who explicitly justifies her crimes by appealing to Christian values (and YES, she’s being a consistent Christian), opened Europe’s gates to 1.5 million aliens in one fell swoop, while the Catholic Church’s COMECE has probably welcomed and accommodated more of Europe’s natural enemies than has any other organization. And the Church too has acted in harmony with the altruism that Christian morality contains.

    I despise ALL the Abrahamic religions (like Klassen and Hale I’m a Pantheist), Judaism, Islam and Christianity; but I regard the latter as the worst of all creeds. The other two are much more consonant with life and survival in this world. Judaism says “An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth.” Islam says that if anyone wreaks evil upon you, it’s perfectly righteous to knock the hell out of them. But Christianity has accustomed Western man to the quaint belief that being a doormat is virtuous. The harder your enemy shoves a slivery broomstick up your arse, and the more you bless him and love him and pray for him, the more righteous you are. “Resist not evil,” “pray for those who despitefully use you,” and “turn the other cheek.”

    Besides, this world is tainted and corrupt, ruined by Adam’s disobedience and Satan’s machinations: it’s doomed to end soon! Of what importance is one’s European heritage or the possession of one’s ancestral lands? They are but worldly vanities and they reek with the sin of pride. Blessed are the meek and poor in spirit: in other words, be a loser–it’s the best thing LOL!

    Well, what else can be expected from a superstition that posits ORIGINAL sin LOL and says, in its anti-sex and therefore anti-life way, “in sin did my mother bear me.”

    Perhaps the most embarrassing thing about the movement of which I’m part–White or European Nationalism (I’m an Italian national)–is that there are many Nationalists who exalt Crutchtianity (sic) as though it were a quintessentially European treasure. In the first place, there’s that ideological incongruity with healthy egoism, the fierce pride and self-love and will to resist that we Euros need so desperately; and secondly, these people who interminably knock Jews and accuse them of creating nothing but evil, nonetheless regard a Jew (a onetime carpenter no less) as their god–a scion of the House of David LOL and the son of the Jewish god; they exalt a creed that’s obviously a decadent offshoot of Judaism and is the cousin of Islam.

    I express these things more fully, meeting possible objections too, in three articles: “The Biggest Religious Threat to Europe is Christianity, not Islam,” “White/Euro Nationalism and–Christianity?” and “Threats to European Civilization; #1: Ourselves.” They’re in my newly published blog THE EUROPEAN FAMILY, which might be accessed by clicking on theeuropeanfamily.com If that fails, anyone interested can get to the blog via my Facebook page, called LUCIUS VANINI.

    Reply
    • TJ
      TJ says:

      Our problem in one word- monopoly.

      Information- (((media))) and (((education))).

      (((Monetary)))- almost all central banks being jewish. Iran is vilified due to not having a jew-controlled central bank- that is the unstated real reason.

      Christian refugee orgs receive GOBS of taxpayer monies. In the year Two Thousand Catholic Charities received $6,000,000,000
      in funds stolen from taxpayers- mostly White, I presume. CC does not publish the numbers any longer. . .

      Reply
    • Andrew
      Andrew says:

      Lucius Vanini: What a great comment. Well said.

      I haven’t deleted any of my comments and I don’t think anyone else has. You might be talking about a comment I made in response to a different article.

      Part of me hates to be critical of Christianity because of the great European art that it has inspired — cathedrals, painting, sculpture and music. But I agree with you. It must not be allowed to influence politics.

      And couldn’t it be argued, even from a Christian point of view, that applying the standards of heaven to earth demeans heaven? Let the rules of heaven be the rules of heaven and the rules of this world be the rules of this world.

      We are at our best when we are loyal to our own people and behave with honor and fairness to all other people.

      We are at our worst when we fail to do those things.

      Reply
  12. Fenria
    Fenria says:

    While it’s great that we have articles like these full of examples of the worst immigrant behavior, white people don’t need to justify why we don’t want hordes of economic opportunist foreigners in our nations. The answer is just “no”. It doesn’t have to be any more complicated than that. We don’t have to link that “no” to an horrific story of sexual abuse in order for our preference to be valid. Europe is OUR continent, and when we say no, that’s it. It’s just NO, end of story.

    Unfortunately, today’s Hegelian dialectic parameters have conditioned white people into thinking we have to back up our “no” with an explanation. We don’t. We can just say NO. Period, full stop. Anyone who doesn’t like it can just be told NO until they grasp the concept.

    Reply
  13. Tim Heydon
    Tim Heydon says:

    An excellent article which bravely tells it as it is. The means by which the devastation of White, Christian Europe has been orchestrated through mass immigration and identity politics because it is thought to meet the yardstick, ‘Is it good for the Jews ?’ is detailed in Kevin MacDonald’s ‘Culture of Critique.’

    Actually the Jews have made a fatal miscalculation. Yes they have gone a fair way to destroying the most glitteringly successful Civilisation in history by far ; the Christian West. But in encouraging the importation of millions of Muslims into the West they have created a growing army of their virulent enemies who are prepared to use violence against them.

    Were it not for the difficulty of getting their work and professional qualifications recognised in Israel, most of French Jewry, for example, would by now have emigrated to that country because of the threat and actuality of Muslim violence against them.

    Reply
    • moneytalks
      moneytalks says:

      It is difficult to imagine that the jewmasters ” miscalculated ” when they invited hordes of their most ” virulent enemies ” into their European jewish homelands . It is more likely that the jewmasters fear the possibility , howsoever remote , of defeat by the on-the-ropes Whites more than they fear the possibility of defeat by their muslim enemies .

      Reply
      • Andrew
        Andrew says:

        The Big Jews have always been ready to sacrifice the Little Jews.

        Any Jew has the right to immigrate to Israel if things get rough in other countries. For the Big Jews, that’s a sufficient concession to the Little Jews who might face hostility from Muslims, blacks, anti-Jewish whites, etc.

        The assumption of the Big Jews is that they will end up running the world — they already do to a large extent — so they are not worried about Muslims.

        French rabbi Rav David Touitou: “Is it good that Islam invades Europe? It is excellent….Islam is the broom of Israel.”

        Reply
  14. A Mayer
    A Mayer says:

    Why, oh why were the two featured creatures allowed into Europe, let alone England. Both are employed by the Guardian left-liberal newspaper, which ,like the BBC gets its revenue from the public sector (the paper from its local government advertising (education , social services , etc features), the BBC from its compulsory tax or licence fee. The positions held by these women could easily be held by any European or native British person. One is Sudanese, for heaven’s sake. I can hear Hymie saying: “The suckers (the goyim) are paying for their own-replacement. Ha ha ha!”

    Reply
  15. O'Meara
    O'Meara says:

    I would love to see the faces on any anti-White Guardian hack while reading this. TL runs rings around them, not just with the facts…but the writing too…and wouldn’t they’d know it!

    Reply
  16. Vehmgericht
    Vehmgericht says:

    Afua (pronounced Eff-Waa) Hirsch is banging her familiar drum again in today’s Guardian:

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/13/integration-racism-assimilation-britain-heritage

    This time Afua is exercised that ‘migrants’ (i.e. Afro-Islamic settlers) should not be pressured or even encouraged to assimilate to British culture – for that would be an expression of racism, white supremacy etc. It’s already bad enough that they must endure their names being mispronounced by seemingly polite but passively prejudiced British natives. And many other travails besides. Tsk.

    More interesting is a bit by a less frequently aired commentator, Daniel Trilling

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/13/protecting-europe-migrants-far-right-eu-nationalism.

    Trilling admonishes that recent tepid remarks by ‘EU tecnocrats’ suggesting a ‘European Way of Life’ be safeguarded are dangerous nonsense! According to Trilling, people in Europe have nothing in at all common apart from their geographic proximity: to pretend otherwise is to fuel regressive nationalism. And in any case, Europe is not just for white people: it needs to become more diverse, he urges.

    Trilling is the author of ‘Bloody Nasty People’, a courageous book that dissects the British far-right, in which he writes movingly of the plight of Liverpool’s kosher butchers menaced by right-wing thugs in the aftermath of the post-war Zionist Irgun campaign to oust British troops from Mandatory Palestine.

    I expect that Trilling shall become a Guardian regular alongside Malik and Hirsch on the anti-Whiteness beat.

    Reply
    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      In your second-last paragraph you are probably referring to what is called The Sergeants Affair. Two Br. soldiers, tasked to ferret out Irgun terrorists in pre-Israel Palestine, were extra-judicially convicted to death by an “Israeli” court, lacking jurisdiction.

      Their bodies were hung from trees and booby-trapped to kill or injure those cutting them down.

      Thus we had so-called anti-Semetic outrages in Liverpool and along the entire Br. west coast, as well as in London, MERELY A YEAR AND A HALF AFTER THE LIBERATION OF AUSCHWITZ.

      Chief Rabbi Sacks babbled something about such and such anti-Semetic outrage being the last in his and his colleagues’ ” living memory since the Holocaust “, before the EU. He and his colleagues purposefully ignored the understandable reaction by not only British nationalists but by the broad Br. public. Especially at the threshold of the realization of their Balfour Declaration in the fall of 47 in the UN: weeks later.

      It wasn’t only Liverpool kosher butchers who were made to feel Br. wrath as a result of this Jewish logic, which had invoked a pre-state Military Court, to execute and then hang these two fellows, boobytrapping the approaches to the eucalyptus trees.

      Jewish stores, homes and at least one synagogue, quite outside of Liverpool, were damaged by fire and ” broken glass ” ! Ostensibly forgotten by Sacks and colleagues. And of course Trilling.

      Shilling and trilling Trilling is an apt addition to that hasbara rag: adept at re-writing history.

      Reply
    • Andrew
      Andrew says:

      I think it’s a safe bet that “Trilling” is a Jewish name and that Daniel Trilling is a Jew — just like the famous Trillings (Lionel and Diana?) of New York City.

      What a “surprise”: a Jew telling “my fellow white people” that they don’t matter (unless they’re Jewish, of course).

      Reply
    • Charles Frey
      Charles Frey says:

      Your second-last paragraph must be augmented by any serious reader by, at minimum, reading at least the Wikipedia entry on THE SERGEANTS’ AFFAIR: to demonstrate shilling Trilling’s clumsy attempt to re-write history.

      Far from only kosher butchers in Liverpool being vandalized, anti-Semitic incidents occurred in Scotland and Wales as well: reaching into London itself: merely 18 months after the liberation of Auschwitz.

      One wooden Synagogue went up, others defaced, entire business streets and residential conclaves experienced more than one ” night of broken glass “.

      Weeks later, Israel was conceived by the UN. Was Menachem Begin’s Irgun extra-judicial murder of two Br. Intelligence sergeants necessary ? Of whom one was Jewish ! Was it necessary for that War Criminal to order the booby-trapping of the hanging eucalyptus trees, wounding one Officer taking down the two bodies ?

      In present GB, shilling Trilling’s career is guaranteed.

      Reply
  17. Charles Frey
    Charles Frey says:

    I love the joyful photo of Sacks and that other sack. I have it on unimpeachable authority, that it was taken seconds after a jury declared a tie on a vote, as to whose nose is more characteristic.

    Reply
  18. Rerevisionist
    Rerevisionist says:

    May I repeat the URL of an interesting site
    http://world-war-3-explained.blogspot.com/
    which gives convincing predictions for ww3, and explanations for oddities such as jews promoting black and muslim immigration, the use of false flags, the pushing of ‘satanist’ imagery, the pushing of ridiculous perversions, the overwhelming jewish ownership of assets. The author gives 30-35 years for war, looking at demography (though real economics, science, communications technology, etc are not mentioned). In a sense he’s optimistic, giving reasons why jews aren’t going for white genocide. But his approach is certainly refreshing – forecasting and ‘hindcasting’, rather than just puzzling over isolated fragmentary facts.

    Reply
    • TJ
      TJ says:

      “. . .overwhelming jewish ownership of assets. . .”

      jews don’t own diddly- the stuff they allegedly own was “bought” by
      their fake money. The assets are stolen property and should be returned to the rightful owners.

      “overwhelming jewish ownership of assets” could be more accurately stated as “overwhelming jewish control of assets.”

      Reply
  19. T.Gilligan
    T.Gilligan says:

    Another prized article by Mr.Langdon, which I could not fail to comment; particularly to the fellow converted questioners and commenters of the new creed of multi-culti-ism. So here is my rotten egg lobbed at the Temple of Diversity.
    A wonderful Pakistan Labour MP, Naz Shah merits our applause for her untethered frankness to Rotherham rape victims: “Shut your mouths (for the sake of diversity). Eloquence aside, tell us what you really think!

    A new season of the BBC morning programme ‘Crimewatch Roadshow’ has begun, and been the equal opportunities ‘hater’ that I have become, notice a pattern of ethnic ‘minority’ violence against English people. Aren’t we supposed to feel enriched?!
    One such case where a 17 yr (male) Pakistani, Ammar Kahrod, in the West Midlands has been imprisoned for life for stabbing to death 26 yr old Englishman James Brindley who a mere 400 yards from his home. The sister and parents of James are baffled, shocked at this ‘random’ act. James had a business career in graphic design ahead of him; oh for the sake of diversity. Other English victims featured on the crime infotainment show, include a young girl sexuality assaulted by a black male in Brighton; a 61 yr old grandmother punched in the head as she slowly cycled past a brown male on the way to work. Oh for Christ’s sake, please acquiesce for the sake of diversity!
    My favourite Guardian related story of recent weeks was the reality biting Mr.Adeylinka Adekimi who has been jailed for 20 months for stealing £138,000 to bankroll his wedding instead of paying freelance journalists at said ‘liberal’ newspaper. Apparently his bride-to-be knew nothing of his fraudulent behaviour. No doubt, Mr. Adekimi and Mrs. Adekimi had a sparkling happy honeymoon in Thailand. Meanwhile, at the Guardianista, any freelance hack suspected of stereotyping Nigerians as dodgy accountants will be duly punished by attending a two week inclusivity training course.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.