• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Featured Articles

M.I.G.A. in the woodpile

May 12, 2026/8 Comments/in Featured Articles/by Tom Zaja

The year is 2028. Trump is now 6’4″, according to his doctor. He has survived more assassination attempts than the other presidents combined. He’s managed to avoid impeachment by way of a backroom deal with the Democrats that granted citizenship to a million Dreamers. Trump says he’s days away from a deal with Putin to end the Ukraine war, just in time to give JD Vance a boost in the polls, but by now only a sprinkling of Evangelicals and diehards remain from his original grassroots base.

What a difference a few years can make. As Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones and Candace Owens wash their hands of this administration, the company that the president keeps leaves little mystery as to where things go from here. These days the president prefers to bathe in the sweet and soggy praise of those who were against him when he first ran for office: Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro and Lindsey Graham. As strange as it is to say, Trump has become a Never-Trumper.

Back in 2015, I wrote the semi-satirical piece Why Donald Trump Should have held a Miss Universe pageant in Iran. Before the Islamic Revolution of 1978 Iran actually used to host beauty pageants, but the broader point was that commerce and cultural exchange often succeed in relaxing political barriers. The article was initially rejected for being too negative about Trump’s personal baggage at a time when he was the next big hope, but indeed many of the early warning signs were there that in the slipstream of this populist Pegasus was a neocon Trojan horse. Trump was already a huge war hawk on Iran and an advocate of massive military spending. His extensive business and familial ties in New York were completely intertwined with Jews, including in-laws and grandchildren. So while some red meat was thrown into the mix in the form of anti-immigrant nativism, the overall manifestation of the two Trump administrations hardly diverges from its headwaters. These days, Trump rarely utters the slogan America First – perhaps a Freudian pink slip of termination – but what you will hear coming out of the woodwork from a growing number of defectors is the Make Israel Great Again lampoon. Let’s assess the claim.

Over the Trump era, we’ve seen the embassy moved to Jerusalem, recognition of Golan’s annexation and the conclusion of Gaza’s demolition. The 1.9 million refugees slowly being redistributed to neighboring countries could also end up in a neighborhood near you. The ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, is an open supporter of the Greater Israel Project (and he is the Christian in Trump’s cabinet). Appetites for a chunk of the fallen Syrian state persist as rumors for now, while Israel has invaded Lebanon up to the Litani River and may well convert this “defensive buffer” into eventual annexation. The fighting is so fierce that one IDF soldier was forced to use a sledgehammer to defend himself against a statue of Jesus.

On the socioeconomic front, inflation in Israel is a mere 1.9%, compared to 3.5% in the United States and up to 6% in some EU countries. New Jewish immigrants continue to arrive in Israel and the country even ranked eighth in the recent World Happiness Report – remarkable in the midst of intermittent war. Israelis are a special breed, not only do they repeatedly choose Benjamin Netanyahu to lead them but also Knesset ogres like Itamar Ben-Gvir, whose recent role in the bringing about Palestinian death penalty law was celebrated by his wife baking a birthday cake with the image of a noose and the words “Sometimes dreams come true.”

Out in the Diaspora, the morale of Jewish activists might not be quite so plucky but it nevertheless endures with aggressive litigation of everything deemed antisemitic. Australia recently completed an inquisition following the Bondi attack by two Muslims, with the expected fallout that free speech and gun rights will be further stymied. It’s unlikely there’ll be many more influential youth leaders who dare take a stand on Israel the way Charlie Kirk did before he was wiped off the map. There’s a saying among political pundits that nothing is true until Benjamin Netanyahu denies it, and sure enough the Israeli PM embarked on a strangely prolific campaign to deny Israeli involvement in the Kirk assassination.

A similar run of good luck with plausible deniability has carried the Jeffrey Epstein affair to an anticlimactic stalemate, even if it’s widely assumed he must have been running a blackmail operation on behalf of the Israelis. No indictments, no justice for victims and not even a minor scandal about the use of Jewish supremacist language in the emails. Instead of a Goyim Lives Matter awakening, Americans were treated to this hysterical exchange in the congressional hearing in which antisemitism became the focal point. Who knows what will be written about the Protocols of the Elders of Epstein a century from now? I say that because the passage of time invariably gives Jewish narratives the benefit of the doubt.

Last week in Brussels, stained glass windows more than a century old were removed from the Cathedral of St. Michael and St. Gudula because they were said to be antisemitic depictions of a blood-libel from 1370. Not knowing precisely what happened seven centuries ago might be one reason to remove the murals, but what the clergy have agreed to do is to kowtow with an apology plaque in place of the windows and grovel to the Jewish community for forgiveness. This is the direction that atonement and reconciliation always travels in between these groups. The Middle Ages may have been a time of rampant superstition and religious mania, however I see no reason why such zealotry would have been confined to Christians while Jews be considered paragons of equanimity not at all prone to neurotic curiosities and conspiracy.

The lifetime work of Ariel Toaff is a good place to start for the alternative perspective, as the Israeli-based professor of medieval history proved through meticulous research that European Jews were involved in ritualistic blood sacrifice beyond the garden variety of kabbalah. The modern State of Israel hardly inspires more confidence given some of the civic ordinances that transpire, quite contrary to its reputed secularism. Footage from recent protests in Israel caught my eye for I had never noticed that the country’s ambulances were marked with a red hexagram instead of a Red Cross. Thus the Israelis have done what Muslims have done with the Red Crescent, even though the humanitarian movement of the Red Cross has nothing to do with religion (the logo is an inversion of neutral Switzerland’s flag). At any rate, the Rothschild family sign has come full circle in modern Israel, but it hasn’t stopped the pathological aversion to anything that looks like a cross. The education system in Israel has gone to the extreme of banning the international plus sign because it resembles the crucifix. In its place, the up tack (﬩) was implemented to placate all of the “pious” Jews – for whom spitting on crosses is a 1,800-year-old tradition.

The other week at a protest in northern Israel police confiscated a Hungarian flag from an anti-Netanyahu demonstrator on the grounds that it looked too similar to the Palestinian flag! Poor Viktor Orban just can’t catch a break these past few weeks. The sole democracy in the Middle East they keep telling us, but such are the level of frivolous sensitivity, irritability and institutionalized chutzpah. Last month an Israeli lawyer and politician serving in the Knesset called for the billions in aid that Israel receives from America to no longer be called aid but rather a “security exchange” and “one of the most cost-effective strategic investments” – especially given the “coordination in confronting Iran.” As with the historical understandings that Western leaders reach with Jewish counterparts, the financial ones seem a lot like Heads: Jews win, Tails: Gentiles lose – with Trump’s visage on upcoming US coinage to supervise the formality. This rather cynical dialectic reminds me of a famous quote from Israeli PM Menachem Begin in which he said “I wish both sides good luck” just as the brutal Iran-Iraq war was beginning. If you like dark humor then wait until you find out that Begin was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1978, in spite of being responsible for the King David Hotel bombing that killed 91 people.

This sounds a lot like the trajectory that Trump is on, pining for shiny accolades while being responsible for grievous crimes. Trump and Netanyahu – two chickpeas in a falafel – have managed to revolt even traditional allies like the servile European ones. Furthermore, Israeli daily Haaretz reports that a critical mass of Jews in America is now disgusted with Israel, although this is a motif we’ve heard before and deserves suspicion. Performative outrage is a staple of the political left, which is the tribe of most American Jews, and so when Israel periodically “mows the lawn” in Palestine the expected outrage is largely performative and temporary, for in the interim period they typically drift back into the fold, recycle their final straw and allow the cycle to repeat. Figures like Bernie Sanders and Chuck Schumer are clearly reluctant critics of Israel, while most Jewish anti-Zionist media are to some extent controlled opposition. One need only look at the editorial staff of the formerly communist now anti-Zionist publication Jewish Currents, which includes born and bred Zionist apostate Arielle Angel and Israel damage-control operative Peter Beinart. In 2021 the publication apologized after being called out for running ads for a “leadership” training program in Israel.

Beinart is the archetypal Jewish activist who advances Jewish interests through the politically correct framework, and is therefore legion with the bipartisan chorus of those still denying Israeli designs and impetus behind the latest war in the Middle East. Too late it seems, as plenty of American normies have crossed the Noticing™ Rubicon, but just to make it official, Secretary of State Marco Rubio had his blond moment (just as his Spanish surname connotes) and inadvertently revealed that Israel forced America’s hand.

Unsurprisingly, social media in recent weeks has been awash with sobering testimonials from Americans of all walks of life who have finally realized that their team has actually been the bad guys all along. Those in active duty appear to have come to the same conclusion, because two incidents of fires on US Navy carriers suggest sabotage from war-shy personnel. It’s been a real treat to watch average Americans call to account not just the Levins and Shapiros, but all of the Shabbos goyim on the AIPAC payroll – folks like Mike Johnson, Ted Cruz, Tom Cotton and Rick Scott. Meanwhile the popularity of Thomas Massie is skyrocketing.

The fault lines of the second Trump administration are now well and truly entrenched and regrettably he has chosen all that glistens – from the gaudy opulence of his material accumulation to the sparkling words of his sycophantic counsel. He at least has the self-awareness to admit that he’s “not heaven bound.” You could almost begin to feel for Elon Musk, who got a raw deal on the EV mandate while the rest of Trump’s inner circle enriches itself beyond all shame. Even Baron Trump now has an estimated net worth of $150 million. Not bad for someone too young to vote, but with that kind of money he can start buying politicians. Joining the fray is sleazebag lawyer Alan Dershowitz, who joined the Republican Party last month, while nutcase Laura Loomer solidifies her face in Trump’s good books. Jews really have a way of getting their foot in the door – readers may recall that Loomer was a speaker at the 2022 American Renaissance Conference, meanwhile luminaries of academia like Kevin MacDonald and Tom Sunic still await an invitation. It would probably take a constellation of experts to understand the totality of Trump’s psychology and physiology; the multiple personalities between campaigner and president, the junk food eater who never sleeps and the teetotaler who is drunk on power.

If Trump is being blackmailed into waging war on Iran then the obvious question is why such blackmail wasn’t active during his relatively pacifistic first term as president. That would be giving him too much credit, and credit is something he can’t get enough. Americans are paying for this spectacular misadventure through a variety of camouflaged ways, meanwhile Trump has the sensibility to mock inflation, Jesus, Tucker Carlson’s IQ and Candace Owens’ looks. It’s still a mystery how he manages to pivot from childish tweets on social media to 90-minute phone calls with the Russian president, the content of which remains highly secretive. It must humor Putin to have Trump’s laconically named social media platform Truth Social translated into Russian, since that’s more or less how the old Soviet newspaper Pravda was named.

There’s a well-known aphorism in diplomacy that says if you aren’t at the table then you are on the menu. That doesn’t bode well for Ukraine, which is now solely reliant on an energy-starved Europe. Zelensky, who is involved “up to his neck” in money-laundering according to a former Ukrainian diplomat and prosecutor, keeps registering his interest for nuclear weapons. Lousy timing indeed, following the recent advancement of the so-called Doomsday clock to a record 85 seconds to midnight. In an era of erratic, contemptuous and nihilistic Western rule we may ask whether the bothersome convention of daylight savings adjustments actually serves a wise purpose: confusing the timekeepers of our Armageddon. Whether Trump is the cuckoo or just the cuckservative of this late hour, I leave readers to decide.

 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Tom Zaja https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Tom Zaja2026-05-12 06:52:522026-05-12 21:23:04M.I.G.A. in the woodpile

Could President Trump Be Crazy Like A Fox?

May 11, 2026/22 Comments/in Featured Articles/by Patrick Cleburne

Could President Trump Be Crazy Like A Fox?

Breaking The Zionist Grip On America: The Greatest Service A U.S. Statesman Could Do?

Patrick Cleburne
May 10, 2026

 

Mount Rushmore National Memorial (U.S ...

See also So, The Israelis Control U.S. Middle East Policy. But Are They Wise?

Continuous war drum-beating notwithstanding, the fact is that shutting down the Iran effort now could yield tremendous benefits for President Trump and America, even justifying the action.

Yesterday I read The war on Iran will likely end in American retreat By Jeffrey Sachs and Sybil Fares Aljazeera 9 May 2026.

Putting aside the emotional triumphalism in this essay, it provides a plausible explanation of why this mess occurred:

The US – Israel war plan was a decapitation strike, sold to President Donald Trump by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and David Barnea, the director of the Mossad. The premise was that an aggressive joint US–Israeli bombing campaign would so degrade the Iranian regime…that the regime would fracture. The United States and Israel would then impose a pliable government in Tehran.

Obviously that has not worked, for totally predictable reasons that the essay discusses.

In war, shutting down an attack or a whole offensive because of lack of success is quite normal. In more rational and less emotional eras like in 18th-century Europe (as opposed to 20th-century) this applied to whole wars. Bureaucratic and political enemies try to make capital from disappointment, but the mass of opinion sees reason.

In October 1956,the British, French and Israelis launched the Suez operation, to reverse Egypt’s Nasser’s theft of the Suez Canal. The Americans led by President Eisenhower threw a petulant tantrum and the Allies had to withdraw in humiliating defeat. This was the end of the UK as a world power

Obviously this was a disaster for the ruling Conservatives in Britain. The very strong Left there exulted and was confident of a sweeping victory at the next General Election. But in fact in October 1959 the Conservatives won with a sharply increased majority.

How did this happen? A British friend had the following insight:

At the time, the BBC had a program called “Any Questions?. A panel of quests, usually including an MP from each of the major parties, answered a range of queries. In one show, in ’57 or ’58, they were asked about the impact of the Suez fiasco on the next election.

After the Labour MP had finished gloating, the Conservative said that he was certain that his party would be returned with an increased majority

“…because when the British People go to vote they will recognize that what the Tories did at Suez, right or wrong, successful or unsuccessful, was done with the best interests of this Country at heart, and for no other reason.”

Retreat is to Trump’s advantage. As the recent Midwest primaries showed, his core base has not wavered. The considerable swathe of disaffected Rightists is likely to welcome his change of mind like the return of the Prodigal Son. And reopening the Strait of Hormuz will quickly reverse the adverse economic impact of this escapade, cheering up the Public as a whole.

Life will not be so easy for the Democratic Leadership. Israel’s Gaza activities since October 2023 have turned substantial majority of Democratic voters against her. So attacking Trump for closing down the effort is not possible. And with the shutdown, with its implicit admission of error, the question of why it was initiated will become academic to most.

Life will become extremely difficult for the Zionists and the Israeli Government. Since the Iran strikes on February 28, Israel has, per a Grok search this evening, occupied 232 square miles (5.7%) of Lebanon, killed up to 2,600 Lebanese and displaced over 1Mm people (19% of the population). Israeli bulldozers are leveling villages and there are mutterings that the plan is to establish a DMZ-like buffer of perhaps 10% of Lebanon.

Meantime, killings in Gaza have accelerated and there is continued connivance at the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank by Jewish settlers.

These facts are less well known to the Americans than they are to the rest of the world because of US MSM repression. But via Podcasts, Social Media and by following foreign news sources, those who are interested can find out.

And the younger generation of Leftists is extremely interested. Quite apart from sincere outrage, the situation provides copious ammunition in the brewing inter-generational war. The surprisingly geriatric Democratic Leadership is weakly positioned to defend itself against charges of being negligent on the Israel question.

Anyone following the Primaries knows this battle has been joined. I believe it was at the root of the strange purge at the Southern Poverty Law Center in 2024. Wherever young Leftists are influential, conflict erupts.

An important demonstration of this is the progress of H.R.3565 “To provide for a limitation on the transfer of defense articles and defense services to Israel.” This Bill was introduced on May 21, 2025, and was endorsed by 56 Democrats by the time of the Gaza ‘’Ceasefire” on October 10. (No Republicans have signed.) At year end the number was 60 and now stands at 68, with 5 signing up in April. This is 32% of the whole Democratic House delegation. Ominously for the Leadership, support is heavily drawn from non-White Members

A decade ago, the Sponsor of such a measure would probably have been expelled from the Party.

Although many Donor-owned GOP Congresscritters would no doubt like to sign up for the job, the prospect of holding the Republican Party in a Zionist posture is also poor. Discontent with Israel among younger Rightists is strong, as a recent article in The New Yorker bemoaned. And the role of Neoconservatives in the last generation is well known and deeply if quietly resented.

So if President Trump were to abruptly shut down the Iran confrontation, the Israelis would be left conducting massive operations of conquest and virtual extermination in Lebanon, the West Bank and Gaza which their friends around the World will not be able to protect.

Major inflection points in world affairs often have a cogent meta-myth. George III and the American Revolution, Bismarck’s engineering of a united Germany, Hitler’s decision for war in 1939 all come to mind. When studied at the granular level these accounts are generally quite hard to detect. They retain an explicative value.

So it is not necessary to fully believe that President Trump went into the Iran venture thinking it could ultimately end the Zionist grip on American affairs. (Although he may at a subconscious level have grasped that he could withstand failure better than his tormentors.) The recognition of the effects of shutting down would presumably be conscious – if not admitted.

However arrived at

’tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish’d.”

[Hamlet (Act 3, Scene 1)]

Is there room on Mount Rushmore?

Subscribe to Patrick’s Substack

By Patrick Cleburne · Launched a year ago
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Patrick Cleburne https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Patrick Cleburne2026-05-11 08:14:572026-05-11 08:17:31Could President Trump Be Crazy Like A Fox?

Alphonse Toussenel and the Socialist Roots of French Antisemitism

May 10, 2026/7 Comments/in Anti-Jewish Writing, Featured Articles/by Jose Nino

The name of Alphonse Toussenel is conspicuously absent from the modern leftist canon; a silence that serves as a deliberate erasure of a foundational intellectual tradition. While contemporary socialist discourse has been sanitized by decades of Jewish institutional hegemony, the reality remains that the radical origins of Western socialism were deeply intertwined with a sophisticated understanding of Jewish power. To recover the revolutionary potential of the past, one must move beyond the current stifling consensus and revisit the work of thinkers like Toussenel, whose unflinching critique of financial parasitism once united those who recognized the existential threat that organized Jewry posed to their civilization.

Alphonse Toussenel was born on March 17, 1803, in Montreuil-Bellay, near Angers, and died in Paris on April 30, 1885. A devoted disciple of Charles Fourier, the utopian socialist philosopher who envisioned an alternative society organized around cooperative “phalansteries,” Toussenel embedded himself in the most radical currents of early 19th-century French socialism. He settled in Paris in 1836 and the following year became editor-in-chief of the newspaper La Paix — notably a publication firmly on the Right, not a socialist one — before joining the Fourierist movement and co-editing the journal La Phalange from 1839 to 1843. He then co-founded the newspaper La Démocratie pacifique alongside Victor Considerant. In 1841, he took up a post as civil commissioner in Boufarik, Algeria, resigning the following year following a conflict with the military authority.

What makes Toussenel a figure of enduring historical importance was not his editorial career but a single book that poured the intellectual currents of socialist antisemitism into a vessel so potent it would still be poisoning European politics four decades after his death.

It is his 1845 two-volume work Les Juifs, rois de l’époque, subtitled Histoire de la féodalité financière — “The Jews, Kings of the Epoch: A History of Financial Feudalism” — for which Toussenel is remembered. The Encyclopaedia Judaica calls it “one of the most resounding attacks on the Jews published in France” before the appearance of Édouard Drumont’s La France juive, and scholars from Robert Byrnes to Zvi Jonathan Kaplan have identified it as a foundational text of modern antisemitism that directly shaped French antisemitic literature for the 4 decades that followed.

The French Revolution of 1789 had not destroyed feudalism but only changed its form, Toussenel argued as his central thesis. The old aristocracy of birth had been supplanted, in his view, by an aristocracy of money — bankers, speculators, and railway financiers who now effectively controlled the French state, its parliament, its courts, and even its king. He was particularly focused on James de Rothschild — whom he called in the book’s own text “the king of finance, a Jew ennobled by a very Christian king” — whose expected acquisition of the chemin de fer du Nord (the Northern Railway running from Paris to Belgium) Toussenel used as his central exhibit. Railway concessions, state debts, and stock market speculation were, in his telling, all instruments through which Jewish bankers had effectively replaced the French state as the true sovereign over the country’s wealth and labor.

Toussenel’s critique was as much about semantics as it was about steel rails and high finance. Toussenel made explicit that his use of the word “Jew” was not confined to practitioners of Judaism. “I wish to point out to the reader that this word will generally be used here in the popular sense of Jew: banker, usurer,” he wrote. This rhetorical device allowed Toussenel to claim he was not attacking the Jewish people as such while in practice fusing Jewish identity with finance capital. The effect was to make antisemitism palatable across the political spectrum by positioning it as an anti-capitalist force rather than a form of racial prejudice. Nevertheless, Toussenel issued explicit calls for revolutionary action against organized Jewry, most notoriously declaring: “Power to the strong! Death to parasitism! War on the Jews! That is the motto of the new revolution!”

Toussenel’s hostility extended well beyond Jews. He was a fervent Anglophobe, viewing Britain as the archetypal nation of predatory capitalism, merchants, and “birds of prey.” He declared in a phrase that became notorious: “Who says Jew says Protestant” — lumping England, the Netherlands, and Switzerland into his category of exploitative alien finance. He depicted “Londres-Juda” — London-Judea — as “an insatiable vampire sucking the lifeblood of France,” depicting the English and the Jews as twin external and internal threats to French national identity. Accordingly, the Protestant nations of Europe — the English, the Dutch, and the Swiss — were, like the Jews, “merchants and birds of prey,” in Toussenel’s views.

Toussenel’s impact on subsequent antisemitism was enormous. Drumont, the most influential antisemitic journalist in late 19th-century France and author of La France Juive from 1886, drew on Toussenel’s framework and helped ensure his legacy endured. A second edition of Les Juifs, rois de l’époque appeared in 1847. The book was reprinted in 1886 and 1888, becoming a foundational text for the late 19th-century antisemitic movement. Toussenel’s “embittered antisemitic, anti-foreign, and anti-Protestant tirades,” as the Encyclopaedia Judaica notes, “later provided ample inspiration for the anti-Dreyfusards” — the faction that defended the 1894 treason conviction of Jewish army captain Alfred Dreyfus, whose decade-long legal ordeal split France. As Zvi Jonathan Kaplan concluded in Jewish History: “Although Toussenel died in 1885, his work helped to legitimize the forces that led to the Dreyfus Affair.”

Toussenel’s death in 1885 did not end his influence. The antisemitic worldview he popularized gained momentum with Drumont’s 1886 publication of La France Juive, then exploded into national crisis during the Dreyfus Affair a decade later.

Toussenel serves as a bridge, inviting us to see past the manufactured illusions of the current political order. His synthesis of social justice and racial survival stands as an indictment of the modern left and a challenge to the timid, controlled right—both ideological strains that have been tarred by Jewish subversion. As we witness the ongoing displacement of Whites across the globe, the need to reintegrate these suppressed, hard-edged truths into our discourse is paramount. Outmaneuvering the Jewish masters of our age requires us to master the lessons of the past. Toussenel recognized the ‘Kings of the Epoch’ for the parasites they are; now, we must sharpen his legacy into a cohesive political strategy to secure the survival and freedom of the West.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Jose Nino https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Jose Nino2026-05-10 08:10:032026-05-10 08:10:03Alphonse Toussenel and the Socialist Roots of French Antisemitism

The Willing Dupes and Traitors of the Flowerman People: The Suicidal White War on Western Civilization

May 9, 2026/12 Comments/in Featured Articles, Western Civilization, Western Culture/by Pierre Simon

He who permits himself to tell a lie once,
finds it much easier to do it a second and third time,
till at length it becomes habitual.
Thomas Jefferson

A major Jewish group evolutionary strategy used to weaken the competitiveness of a majority White society and on a larger scale, Western civilization, is cultural Marxism, a core mechanism that reduces anti-Semitism and enhances Jewish competitive success by breaking the collective resistance and viability of the White race, making it easier to control, exploit, or replace.[1], [2]

Its creators insisted on the need to hide the real purpose of their project under the cover of innocent and positive sounding words, respectability, and especially “science,” an indispensable universal method of inquiry, which they have hijacked and corrupted for their own needs.

This racial project is thus forced on the public in a stealth fashion by sophisticated social engineering techniques through education, books, mainstream media, movies, TV series, sitcoms, and government propaganda.

As summarized by archeologist Dr. Timothy Ives, this psychological weapon of mass destruction “was the outgrowth of the anti-empirical Frankfurt school that viewed the role of a scholar as a social critic without the need to validate any of his claims.”[3]

To break the spirit of the White race, in his article Mass Propaganda in the War Against Bigotry (1947),[4] Jewish American psychologist Samuel H. Flowerman recommends, and I quote, the “diminishment of cultural pride and self-esteem” and to do this dirty work, the sponsorship of “willing dupes or traitors.” [5],[6] But don’t be fooled by the intended “war on bigotry.” This is not a noble effort motivated by a sincere concern to fight racism. As shown in a previous article, Moses, the First “Führer” in History: Jewish Racial Consciousness and Supremacism, no one is more bigoted than this subset of Jews, aka the “Flowerman people” in this article.

Schools and universities, which are mostly staffed with White Flowerman-led cultural Marxist ideologues, with some teachers from the Third World, play a huge role in the spreading of this fake war on bigotry.[7] Even pre-school White children are being brainwashed; by the time they finish university, they hate themselves and their race to the point of wanting to destroy their own kind in the following spirit taken from an anonymous meme called “Meanwhile at a Random University.” A “Nazi” in this diatribe is a conservative who doesn’t want the future these ’Babel stooges” are preparing; he prefers meat to crickets, he’s for God, reason, freedom, law and order, family, and nation. On the other hand, leftists are programmed to say things like the following:

I hate Nazis, they can’t think for themselves!!! They’re just brainwashed sheep who follow racist dogmas and do everything their shepherd’s command!!! They’re also insensitive anti-Semites, misogynous, bigots, homophobic, fascists and should be all jailed!!!

Auschwitz, slavery, and colonialism are some of the better-known historical mischiefs that serve this purpose. What willing dupes and traitors are teaching in schools about European civilization and its accomplishments is another lesser-known  evolutionary strategy used to diminish the cultural pride and self-esteem of the Flowerman people’s main competitors.

To break White man’s will for power and weaken his competitiveness, everything about his exceptional civilization is downplayed and demonized while non-Western achievements are elevated to nonsensical levels “in violation of the most basic protocols of scholarly research, evidence, and standards,” notes Dr. Ricardo Duchesne, former Professor of Sociology at the University of New Brunswick, the author of Faustian Man in a Multicultural Age.[8]

A Flowerman Derrida-type of postmodernist rhetoric is routinely used to “confuse, detract from, or avoid facing the overwhelming evidence standing in opposition to their absurd claims,” asserts Dr. Duchesne, “sources are misused, books are misread, the evidence is grossly misinterpreted, facts are concealed, the principles of historical objectivity and respect for scholarship are trashed in order to enhance the imagined merits of multiculturalism inside European created cultures.”[9]

Darwinian theory and evolutionary psychology are erased from the discourse in an effort to prove that there is only one race, the human race.[10] Egalitarianism being the sacred cow of the “Babel stooges,” obviously, they go to great lengths with this abuse of the historical profession in order to prove with their bogus ideas that all civilizations are equal and that European civilization was not exceptional. As noted by Dr. Duchesne,

What is going on here cannot be attributed to mere empirical incompleteness and understandable errors of judgment. Our students today may be said to be the targets of deep-seated educational efforts to impose a multicultural view of Europe’s history, that is heavily infused with fabrications and the mistreatment of scholarly sources.[11]

To do this dirty job of deconstruction and rewriting of world history in accordance with the interests of the Flowerman people, even though existing research does not validate their perspective, the willing dupes and traitors of this trickery are paid handsomely, covered with laurels and gifts, and awarded with generous research grants. In exchange for betraying their own race, they become the prominent  professors at Ivy League universities in the U.S. and at prestigious universities throughout the West; they are given lucrative positions at prestigious think tanks and on the board of large corporations; their books and articles are spread far and wide by the mostly Flowerman-owned publishers and media; these evil dupes of the chosen people are highly praised by their peers who repeat blindly to their students every one of their obvious lies; their opinion is the accepted truth and almost no one dares challenge them without dire consequences for their career and advancement.[12]

Professor Duchesne, for example, a man highly esteemed by his students, the author of several scholarly books, was like all his like-minded colleagues in other universities and in other fields, dragged in the mud and ostracized by his weak and feeble-minded, willing-dupe, traitorous colleagues, and forced into early retirement for criticizing this farce disguised in science.[13]

Pseudoscience is the right term for the kind of science these willing dupes and traitors are professing. They have hijacked science to serve their miscreant needs. True to Lenin’s favourite saying, “The end justifies the means,” these useful idiots forcibly adjust reality to the ideas they want to impose on the world.

So, what is it then about European civilization they want people to believe?

For understandable reasons, from their point of view, they first divided history into two periods, before and after the Western Industrial Revolution of the eighteenth century.

Before the Industrial Revolution

There was nothing exceptional about Europe, so they tell us. It did not possess any cultural attributes that could be contrasted to other world cultures. Many parts of Asia, especially China, had equal if not superior technologies in guns, ships, textiles, metallurgy, and agriculture. The world economy was in fact dominated by China.[14] Moreover, the science of Copernicus, Kepler, Laplace, Descartes, and Bacon had their equivalents in other civilizations — it was a global phenomenon. As for the intellectual movements of Ancient Greece, they originated from Africa and the Near East. In short, according to the “willing dupes and traitors” who profess this fantasy, “the Eurocentric claim that Europe with its exceptional culture and institutions created a higher level of technical and scientific proficiency is no more than a myopic perspective lacking a global vision. … The major transformations of history are due to world connections and two-way cultural influences.”[15]

Everything until then, so they tell us, was therefore fair and square, everyone had his word to say, and every civilization shared equally in the artistic, scientific, technical, economic, philosophical, and moral advances that were made. If any divergence existed, it was primarily due to different competitive and ecological pressures. From this perspective, what spoiled it all, what made the European civilization different than others happened after the Industrial Revolution.

After the Industrial Revolution

After this crucial turning point of history, so they tell us, Europeans, for some unexplainable reason, lost their mind and started exploring the world and forming colonies here and there in order to plunder the natural resources of these newly discovered territories. “Pale faces” killed, raped, and enslaved the peaceful and noble savages of these regions, aka, the Third World. That’s how they got rich and how they managed to get ahead in all aspects of life. They basically pounced on other cultures and stole everything they had.

In short, if today’s Third-World countries are going nowhere, it’s mainly because the White slave nations emptied it of its lifeblood before building their industrial revolutions on the profits of slavery and then plundering them through colonial exploitation. This is, of course, a fantasy as shown in Slavery and Colonialism. Are Whites responsible for the Stagnation of Africa and Blacks in General.

Races, which are cultural constructs, so they tell us, had absolutely nothing to do with it. There are no innate influences on behaviour, in other words, that could give one race an edge on the others. There is only one race, the human race, and we are all equal under the skin and in the head, according to the willing dupes and traitors of the Flowerman people: “This is so because we say so. There is no need to validate any of our claims. Science is what we choose it to be. And if you don’t like it, we’ll shame you, dox you, send our Antifa attack dogs against you, get you fired from your job, call you a racist, a bigot, an anti-Semite, a fascist, a Nazi, and a White supremacist.” This is, of course, fear-mongering, intimidation, and another fantasy.

The Role of Biology

Whites  are endowed with unique characteristics that demoralized and subdued Whites who think of themselves as the scum of the earth should consider before depreciating themselves and bowing down to Third-World invaders and the willing dupes and traitors of the Flowerman people.[16]

Truth be told, Whites “originated and developed all the disciplinary fields of knowledge taught in our universities: archeology, botany, economics, sociology, anthropology, history, biology, chemistry, genetics, physics, geology, philosophy, geography—all of them including theology,” as Dr. Duchesne shows in his most recent book, Greatness and Ruin.[17]

According to Dr. Charles Murray, the author of Human Accomplishments: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 BC to 1950:

97% of accomplishments in science, whether measured in people or events, occurred in Europe and North America from 800 BC to 1950. The sheer number of significant figures in the arts is higher in the West in comparison to the combined number of the other civilizations. In literature, the number in the West is 835; whereas in India the Arab world, China and Japan combined, the number is 293. In the visual arts, it is 477 for the West as compared to 192 for China and Japan combined (with no significant figures listed for India and the Arab World). In music, the lack of a tradition of named composers in non-Western civilizations means that the Western total of 522 significant figures has no real competition at all.[18]

As Joseph Sobran said in 1997:

Western man towers over the rest of the world in ways so large as to be almost inexpressible. It’s Western exploration, science, and conquest that revealed the world to itself. Other races feel like subjects of Western power long after colonialism, imperialism, and slavery have disappeared. The charge of racism puzzles whites who feel no hostility, but only baffled good will, because they don’t grasp what it really means: humiliation. The white man presents an image of superiority even when he isn’t conscious of it. And superiority excites envy. Destroying white civilization is the inmost desire of the league of designated victims we call “minorities.”[19]

These are facts you are not allowed to state in universities and schools.[20] The willing dupes and traitors of the Flowerman people will not allow it. Why? Stuck on their mantra “race is a social construct,” they cannot admit that the European civilization is the greatest civilization the world has ever known precisely because of one word: biology. Races are real, and they are not equal in aptitudes. As shown in the following articles, some races such as the White race are in fact more intelligent, more adventurous, and more creative than others.[21], [22]

Race is Real

DeepSeek on Race, Egalitarianism, Jews, the Rulers of the World and the Solution to the Problems They Cause.)

“We are indeed,” laments Dr. Duchesne, “in the midst of one of the most paradoxical phenomena ever witnessed: the very civilization that insisted more than any other that truthfulness requires impartial reasoning and a ‘weight of evidence’ approach is now fabricating facts to fit with an ideological agenda.”[23]

In the end, you could say, as Dr. Duchesne states in his book, Greatness and Ruin, that this fabrication of facts is a “deeply embedded expression of the emancipatory project of Western liberalism itself,” [24] and you wouldn’t be wrong either, if you added, as stated by Dr. Kevin MacDonald and others,[25], [26] that the emancipatory project of liberalism, which came to fruition in the 1960s, was deeply imbued with cultural Marxism and decisively promoted by its Jewish overlords as Jews rose to elite status throughout the West. They are the “Flowerman people” as described in this article.


[1] Kerry Bolton, PhD, The Perversion of Normality. From the Marquis de Sade to Cyborgs, Arktos, 2021.

[2] Kevin MacDonald, PhD, The Culture of Critique. An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, 3rd Edition, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2025.

[3] Cited by Bruce Gilley, PhD, The Case for Colonialism, New English Review Press2023, p. 256.

[4] Samuel H. Flowerman, PhD, “Mass Propaganda and the War Against Bigotry,” The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 42 (4), Oct 1977, pp. 429-439.

[5] Andrew Joyce, PhD, “Modify the standards of the in-group: On Jews and Mass Communications,” The Occidental Observer, January 14, 2020/24.

[6] Kevin MacDonald, PhD, “Samuel H. Flowerman: Pathologizing White Ethnocentrism in the Mass Media,” Culture of Critique, work cited, p. 386 to 393.

[7] Kerry Bolton, PhD, Revolution from Above. Manufacturing “Dissent” in the New World Order, Arktos, 2011.

[8] Ricardo Duchesne, PhD, Faustian Man in a Multicultural Age, Arktos, 2019, p. 103.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Kevin MacDonald, PhD, work cited.

[11] Ibid., p.104.

[12] Kerry Bolton, PhD, Revolution from Above. Manufacturing ‘Dissent’ in the New World Order, Arktos, 2011.

[13] Kerry Bolton, PhD,  The Tyranny of Human Rights. From Jacobinism to the United Nations, Antelope Publishers, 2022, p. 379-381.

[14] Ricardo Duchesne, PhD, Faustian Man, work cited, p. 75.

[15] Ibid., p. 105.

[16] Ricardo Duchesne, PhD, The Uniqueness of Western Civilization, Brill, 2011; see also his latest book, Greatness and Ruin: Self-Reflection and Universalism within European Civilization, Antelope Hill, March 28, 2025.

[17] Ricardo Duchesne, PhD, Greatness and Ruin. Self-Reflexion and Universalism Within European Civilization, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2025, p. 263.

[18] Charles Murray, PhD, Human accomplishments: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 BC to 1950, Harper Collins, 2003.

[19] Gregory Hood, “Resentment and Race,” American Renaissance, April 13, 2022.

[20] Ricardo Duchesne, PhD, Greatness and Ruin. Self-reflection and Universalism Within European Civilization, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2024, p. 264.

[21] Charles Murray, PhD, Human Diversity. The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class, TWELVE, 2020, cited by Ricardo Duchesne in Faustian Man, p. 193.

[22] Ricardo Duchesne, PhD, The Uniqueness of Western Civilization, Brill, 2011; see also his latest book, Greatness and Ruin: Self-Reflection and Universalism within European Civilization, Antelope Hill, March 28, 2025.

[23] Ricardo Duchesne, PhD, Greatness and Ruin. Self-reflection and Universalism Within European Civilization, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2024, p. 264.

[24] Ibid.

[25] Kevin MacDonald, PhD, The Culture of Critique. An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, 3rd Edition, Antelope Hill Publishing, 2025.

[26] Kerry Bolton, PhD, The Perversion of Normality. From the Marquis de Sade to Cyborgs, Arktos, 2021.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Pierre Simon https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Pierre Simon2026-05-09 08:16:532026-05-09 08:41:47The Willing Dupes and Traitors of the Flowerman People: The Suicidal White War on Western Civilization

Such Skill Beneath the Skull: Celebrating the White Genius of Dutch Art

May 8, 2026/14 Comments/in Featured Articles, Western Culture/by Tobias Langdon

Thunderclap: A Memoir of Art and Life & Sudden Death
Laura Cumming (Chatto and Windus, 2023)

Reading is richer for racists. That’s on the good side. On the bad side, reading can be more regretful for racists too. You’ll find both the good side and the bad side of racist reading in Laura Cumming’s excellent book Thunderclap. It’s partly a study of art in the Dutch Golden Age and partly a memoir of how the author came to know and love that art. And to base part of her career on it: Cumming has been “chief art critic of the Observer since 1999.” That is, she’s a Guardianista (the Observer is the Sunday edition of the Guardian). And she wrote this book for other Guardianistas. But it isn’t Guardianistas who will get the most out of the book or the art it discusses and displays.

Thunderclap with a skilful skull, Vanitas by the Flemish master Hendrick Andriessen[1] (Wikipedia)

No, it will be racists and sexists like me. This is because Guardianistas won’t notice, or won’t dare to notice, some fascinating and important questions raised by the book. The Netherlands — the Low Countries comprising modern Holland, Belgium et al — is a small region whose population numbered perhaps two million by the Golden Age of the seventeenth century. And yet from the Middle Ages that small population turned out painters of astonishing subtlety and skill. They outcompeted in quality and quantity the far larger and more populous nations of France, Germany and Britain, and were matched or surpassed only by Italy. The Netherlands was the birthplace of Van Eyck and Hieronymus Bosch, Rembrandt and Vermeer, creators of immortal art whom we can justly call geniuses. Yet Cumming never asks why and how this could be so. How could such a small region produce so many world-conquering painters?[2] And such good painting in such quantity?

Holland in the hexagon: We owe “97% of human accomplishment” since the 1300s to White men in this region

If she had asked those questions, she would of course have confined her answers entirely to culture and invention. And yes, culture and invention — glass and lenses, for example — do undoubtedly explain some of the Dutch success in art before and during the Golden Age. But those things alone don’t and can’t explain all of it. Genetics played a central part too, because genetics was involved in all of it: the art, the culture, the invention. Those sublime skills arose within skulls of a particular kind. Dutch genius was a subset of White genius, of the evolved intelligence and inventiveness of White northern Europeans. Holland sits inside a hexagon of achievement identified by Charles Murray in his book Human Accomplishment (2003): “97% of human accomplishment since the 14th century occurred from men born in this region.” Among the men discussed by Murray are Rembrandt and Vermeer, two Dutch masters who are also discussed by Cumming in Thunderclap. But her book centers on a Dutch master whose art is now far better known than his name. Millions of people are familiar with this painting, for example:

The Goldfinch or Het puttertje (1654) (Wikipedia)

But who painted it? I knew the painting when I picked Thunderclap up earlier this year, but I couldn’t have told you the name of the painter. He was Carel Fabritius, born in 1622 and killed thirty-two years later in the huge accidental explosion from which Thunderclap takes its title. The Dutch town of Delft was deafened and part-destroyed in the mid-morning of 12th October 1654, when the carelessness of a government official ignited stocks of gunpowder held in a vault near the center of the town. This is how Cumming describes the disaster:

Trees are torn from their roots, bodies lifted into the air in a torrential uprush. It takes a while for the living to rise up from the ground, stunned and terrified of another blast. Which comes, as 90,000 pounds of black gunpowder stored in barrels in the vault detonate in a rapid bombing pattern of explosions that rip through Delft, exactly as happened in the present century when the port of Beirut exploded, the sound heard as far away as Cyprus. Some citizens are tormented by tinnitus for weeks. Others are permanently deafened. (“Three,” p. 223)

Fabritius was carried severely injured from the ruins of his house and died shortly afterwards. It was the final tragedy of a tragic life, for he had lost his first wife in childbirth and three children to disease by then. Death came early and often in those days, but Cumming understands only the tragedy of that, not the implications for human evolution. Fabritius seems to have left no descendants: he failed genetically. But he triumphed memetically, because one thing survived from his shattered house. As Cumming describes on the final page of Thunderclap, modern scanning has revealed that his most famous painting was there on that thunderous day. But the fragments driven against it by the blast “did not split or shatter” its surface “because it was not dry.” No, “The Goldfinch was still wet, still drying, a work in progress like its maker, a living thing in the studio when Fabritius was dying.” (p. 256)

That’s a memorable image to end a memorable book, a celebration of some of the world’s greatest art and greatest artists in one of the world’s smallest and least geographically fortunate nations. Vermeer is celebrated in Thunderclap, of course, and Cumming casts a skilful and appreciative eye over masterpieces like View of Delft (c. 1660):

Zicht op Delft or View of Delft by Johannes Vermeer (c. 1660) (Wikipedia)

But she centers the book on Fabritius and does her best to give him some of Vermeer’s stature. I don’t think she succeeds. Yes, The Goldfinch is a masterpiece, but not at Vermeer’s level and I wouldn’t apply the same label to the rest of what has survived of Fabritius’s art. Instead, I’d call it strange and interesting. Perhaps if he had lived longer or painted more, his name would be better known today. But he was neither prolific nor fortunate, and it was obviously the tragedy and mystery of his life that drew Cumming to him. He’s a tragic hero, bereaved early and often before dying young and suddenly, having just created what would become a world-conquering piece of avian art. But I think a piece of vegetable art included in the book is greater than almost anything that has survived by Fabritius. It’s Still Life of Asparagus by Adriaen Coorte (c. 1665–c. 1707):

Coorte, Adriaen; Still Life of Asparagus; The Ashmolean Museum of Art and Archaeology; http://www.artuk.org/artworks/still-life-of-asparagus-141862

Still Life of Asparagus or Stilleven met asperges by Adriaen Coorte (version in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford)

To invest a face or a finch or a flower with sublimity is high achievement for an artist. But higher still is to invest vegetables with sublimity. That’s what Coorte did in the still-life above. And in Laura Cumming’s own life, his painting would be a leap to the sublime from the ridiculous. How so? Well, she describes how she was studying literature at Oxford and went to see the “French philosopher Derrida” speak at the Modern Languages Faculty. But Derrida was delivering his “impeccably difficult lecture” in French and she felt ashamed not to follow it well. To console herself afterwards, she visited the Ashmolean Museum next door. It was there that she “saw a small painting glowing in a gallery dim with shadows.” It was her first encounter with the art of Coorte, whom she would come to regard as “the greatest” of “Dutch still-life painters”:

It showed a bunch of asparagus lying on a shelf, perhaps a dozen spears, running from white to silvery-green at the tips. This humble sheaf, tied up with string, is positioned at a curious tilt. But what strikes first and last is the black and white thunderclap — the obliterating darkness from which these stalks stand out in a light so bright it appears to come from within as well as from without. Young asparagus has that pale metallic sheen, as if it had stored up some internal power from growing up out of darkness. But this light was almost supernaturally bright, darting along the edge of the stone shelf like a laser, igniting the nubs and tips and woody root where the blade has sliced right through — such modest vegetables held in such glory. (“Two,” p. 139)

Those seven final words are an excellent summary of the appeal of Dutch art in the Golden Age: “such modest vegetables held in such glory.” The Protestantism of Vermeer and Rembrandt had replaced the Catholicism of Bosch and Van Eyck, the mundane had replaced the Madonna, but Dutch art was still celebrating miracles. Indeed, paintings like Coorte’s still-life make a miracle out of the mundane and the material. In a sense, he sanctified the bunch of asparagus, investing its color and shape and fleeting presence with an awe that escapes any hint of incongruity. Yes, the painting tells you, matter is miraculous and the modesty of Still Life of Asparagus multiplies the miracle.

Flowers in an Ornamental Vase or Bloemen in een siervaas by Maria van Oosterwijck (1670) (Wikipedia)

A couple of pages before that, there’s a fiery and flamboyant still-life of flowers by the female artist Maria van Oosterwijck (1630-93). It’s an excellent painting, full of color, detail and what Cumming rightly calls joie de vivre. But it isn’t full of genius in the way that Coorte’s “modest vegetables” are. And that raises another question that Guardianistas like Cumming do not like to ask or even acknowledge. Why is genius so much a male phenomenon? Why do men invent and innovate on a scale and over a range far beyond women?

More particularly — and more unspeakably still for Guardianistas — why do White men have such a disproportionate share of genius? As Charles Murray said, “97% of human accomplishment since the 14th century occurred from men born” in that north European hexagon with its corners over lowland Scotland, Denmark, central Europe, central Italy, southern France and southern England. It’s a hexagon of White male genius: there has been no female Vermeer just as there has been no female Mozart or female Newton.[3] Guardianistas would of course attribute that over-achievement of White men entirely to culture, contingency and male evil, because their leftist dogmas state that all human groups, men and women, Whites and Blacks, gays and straights, are the same under the skin and should therefore succeed or fail at exactly the same rates.

“A team of brilliant women”

That isn’t true and leftists don’t in fact behave as though it’s true. That’s why they believe that male evil explains male success and White evil explains White success. While leftists preach equality, they practise hierarchy, because they believe in privilege for their pets, like women and Muslims, and punishment for their enemies, like men and Christians. That’s why they’re concerned about unequal outcomes only when their favorites are on the losing side. When their favorites are on the winning side, inequality ceases to matter. You can see that double standard in the book under review. In the acknowledgements, Cumming thanks “a team of brilliant women” at her publisher Chatto & Windus, which is now dominated by women like most big publishers in the English-speaking world. Is that female domination a good thing? Of course it is! Does it represent prejudice against men and self-centered scheming by women? Of course it doesn’t! Unlike men, women dominate on merit, not malevolence. Those are the answers you’d get from leftists. But female domination of modern publishing isn’t a good thing. For a start, women are less adventurous and more censorious than men. I don’t think Thunderclap would have been as lyrical or as emotionally rich if it had written by Edward Dutton, but it would have been far more insightful, far more thought-provoking and far readier to ask uncomfortable questions about the racial, sexual and cultural patterns in the art it addresses.

Brilliant Female Publishing: Europe becomes the Black Continent for these travel-guides by Dorling Kindersley

But Dutton’s iconoclasm and intellectual buccaneering are  precisely why the “team of brilliant women” at Chatto would reject any book by him about any aspect of European art or culture. Dutton is a racist, sexist and homophobe with, for leftists, unspeakably wicked ideas about genetics, psychology and racial difference. He belongs to a thoroughly unfavored group, that of the White Heterosexual Able-bodied Male or WHAM. So we have the irony of a modern publishing world where it’s women deciding what can be said about the work of White male geniuses like Vermeer and Rembrandt. But I need to give Cumming her due: she isn’t hostile to WHAMs in this book. She doesn’t belong to the Culture of Critique and she doesn’t shoehorn slavery or colonialism anywhere into her analysis. She celebrates Dutch culture and the Dutch throughout rather than denigrating or deconstructing them.

No risk of wrath

And the book is, in part, a celebration of the WHAM responsible for her own existence: her father James Cumming (1922-91), a Scottish modernist painter who helped waken her love of art and of Dutch art in particular. I don’t like the paintings by him reproduced here, but I did like the irony of the final image in the book being a detail from his colorful painting Chromosomes II. Cumming muses on the painting and its title earlier in the book:  “Chroma: colour. Soma: body.” (p. 108) But she doesn’t acknowledge and would never admit that real chromosomes underlie what is celebrated in her book: the embodied genius of White men who could capture color and shape so skilfully on canvas.

The color of chromosomes: how race is obvious in genetic geometry

Her father wasn’t a genius, but it’s perfectly understandable that she should seek to celebrate him and make his art more widely known. He’s family and leftists don’t condemn Whites who celebrate and defend their own family. But they do condemn Whites who celebrate and defend their super-family, that is, their race. Cumming runs no risk of leftist wrath in Thunderclap. She doesn’t celebrate her own race or even acknowledge its existence. She presents Dutch artistic genius as though it emerged ex nihilo and owed nothing to genetics or evolution. That’s why she doesn’t write as richly as Dutton might have done. It’s also why her book won’t be read as richly by Guardianistas as it is by racists and sexists like me.

Deliberate disaster

But her book won’t be read as regretfully by Guardianistas either. I both relished and regretted the celebration of Dutch artistic genius in Thunderclap. What did I regret? I regretted what I knew lay ahead for the nation of Vermeer, Rembrandt and Fabritius. A much slower and much more insidious disaster awaited Holland than that accidental detonation of gunpowder stocks in 1654. And it wasn’t an accidental disaster. No, it was the deliberate opening of Holland’s borders to the Third World. Laura Cumming can feel the tragedy of Carel Fabritius losing his wife and children in the seventeenth century. Why can she not feel the tragedy of the native White Dutch losing their nation in the twentieth-first century?

And not just losing their nation: losing it to groups of far lower intelligence and far less achievement. Non-White groups like Moroccan Muslims didn’t give the world sublime art when they lived in their homelands and the magic dirt of Holland hasn’t enabled them to do so after they moved there. What they excel at is not art or invention, but violent crime, welfare dependency, fraud and political corruption. Like Britain, Holland has Muslim rape-gangs and, like Britain again, Holland has leftists enabling and excusing the rape-gangs. Cumming discusses and praises female artists like Maria van Oosterwijck and Rachel Ruysch in her book. But what about the female descendants of those Dutch female greats? Those descendants are at risk and under attack in ways that their ancestress-artists could never have foreseen. Because who could have foreseen in the Dutch Golden Age that the civilized Christian Netherlands, newly liberated from Catholic Spain, would open its borders to Muslim barbarians?

Genius and genetic pacification

Cumming regrets vanished art again and again in Thunderclap, like “the treasury of Golden Age art lost [aboard ship] off Finland in 1771 on its way to Catherine the Great in Russia.” (p. 129) She laments that “Dutch painters are always in debt, verging on destitution: Van Goyen, De Hooch, Fabritius, Vermeer, Rembrandt above all.” (p. 191) But she doesn’t regret or lament what is happening to the whole of Holland in the twenty-first century: submersion beneath a mud-flood and the conversion of what could have been a golden future into something quite different. Now Holland’s future, like Britain’s, threatens to be a bloody chaos of civil war and ethnic cleansing.

But perhaps the atrocities of Holland’s future were predictable from the art of Holland’s past. The art discussed and displayed in Thunderclap is sublime, subtle, spiritual. But it could also be described as subdued and even subjugated. It occasionally contains soldiers but it isn’t martial or militant. It has genius but also gentleness, because it expresses the psychology of a genetically pacified people who had lived for many centuries under a strong state that executed criminals and protected the law-abiding. That’s genetic pacification: a strong state removes genes for violence, sensation-seeking and criminality even as it protects genes for self-control, industry and resistance to boredom. So was this painting by Carel Fabritius an unintended prophecy of Holland’s future?

The Sentry or De poort bewaker by Carel Fabritius (1654) (Wikipedia)

What does The Sentry mean? Art-critics are still arguing about that: as Cumming says, it “is the most enigmatic of Fabritius’s scant few works.” (p. 159) But it could be read as an unintentional allegory of Holland asleep as traitors prepared to release the mud-flood of unassimilable and under-achieving tribalists from the non-White regions like Turkey, Morocco and the Moluccas (a former Dutch colony today part of Indonesia). Those non-White homelands have never produced a Vermeer or a Leeuwenhoek, the great Dutch microscopist who also appears in Thunderclap. He’ll remind some readers that Holland has oversized achievements in science and technology too. Holland’s heritage is mighty and worth fighting for.

And it will be fought for, because the true White Dutch are not dead. The genius of Vermeer, Van Eyck, Rembrandt and the rest now has to be seen not as ars gratia artis, “art for the sake of art,” but as ars gratia Martis, “art for the sake of Mars.” If the White Dutch want to retain their nation and the glories of its art, they will have to fight. And I think they will fight. When I read Thunderclap, I found it impossible to believe that a nation capable of such greatness would ever be defeated by enemies of such inferiority. That’s the final of the racist messages in Thunderclap that its Guardianista author never intended to put there.


[1]  This painting doesn’t appear in Thunderclap, but I needed something both skilful and skullful.

[2]  Vermeer was not properly recognized outside the Netherlands until long after his day, but his art has now conquered the world.

[3]  As the provocateur Camille Paglia once put it: “There is no female Mozart because there is no female Jack the Ripper.”

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Tobias Langdon https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Tobias Langdon2026-05-08 09:03:502026-05-08 09:03:50Such Skill Beneath the Skull: Celebrating the White Genius of Dutch Art

Iran – End of the Drought & the Destruction of US Radar Installations in the Middle East

May 7, 2026/10 Comments/in Featured Articles/by Francis Goumain

Editor’s note: I have long resisted the climate manipulatioin idea but this seems convincing.

Below is an automated translation of an article from the French weekly RIVAROL, one of the last far-right publications in France, which is beset by lawsuits and has lost its press accreditation (and the tax advantages that came with it). It is a paper publication, but it can no longer appear on newsstands, so Rivarol has opted for the PDF format.

The article deals with a subject that we don’t see surfacing much in the American far-right press: drought and climate control as an already existing weapon, discreetly – but intensively – used by the Americans against Iran.

RIVAROL is not a scientific journal, but that being said, the facts are troubling and we must force our opponents to respond:

Why is it that the end of the Iranian drought coincides with the destruction of the ring of American radar installations in the Arabian Peninsula? Doesn’t this confirm what President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had already said long ago about manipulating climate to pursue political interests?

While Iran rains missiles down on its enemies, the rain returns to Iran. Coincidence?

§§§§§

Iran’s first victory against the climate conspiracy

AN ABNORMAL DROUGHT THAT DRAGGED ON

About fifteen years ago, the then-President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, repeatedly claimed that Western powers (under American influence) were “stealing” rain from Persia and much of the Middle East (including Iraq). Naturally, at that time, almost everyone in the West considered the strongman of Tehran a crackpot, a conspiracy theorist who, moreover, had the misfortune, it was assumed, of being a notorious historical revisionist.

Westerners continue to silence or deny what Mahmoud had calmly stated. In 2018, Iran officially accused the United Arab Emirates and Israel of stealing its rains, when the senior official of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Brigadier General Gholam Reza Jalali, declared: “Israel and another country are working together to prevent Iranian clouds from raining.”

The New York Times reported that the country Jalali did not name was the United Arab Emirates, which has launched a cloud seeding program by injecting chemicals into clouds in an attempt to induce rain in its favor, but also to prevent rainfall in Iran.

Today, however, many Middle Eastern elites are talking about the extreme drought and equally abnormal heat that have plagued the region for ages. We also recall that before the war against Iran, the country had suffered for years from a dramatic water shortage that directly endangered the people, especially the nation’s capital, whose inhabitants (and first and foremost the government) were ready to flee rather than become parched or dry out like old stones.

THE RETURN OF THE RAIN 

And then, suddenly, a miracle amidst the misfortunes! In Iran, the clouds finally wept, abundantly and regularly, and temperatures returned to normal (dropping by an average of five degrees Celsius). A few days after the first Iranian strikes against American bases located in the United Arab Emirates and elsewhere on the Arabian Peninsula, the regional climate changed completely.

Initially stunned, the population could observe over the following weeks the gradual filling of natural and reservoir lakes, the return of life to rivers, streams, and springs, the greening and re-greening of meadows, and the return of flora and fauna familiar from the past. In five or six weeks, enormous water reservoirs were filled, and large hydroelectric facilities had to release water to prevent overflows.

The authorities finally called on all Iranian farmers to sow as much wheat as possible and to plant without worry, since water would certainly not be lacking during the summer season. The return of a “normal” spring was not an accident, and this understanding is now shared by everyone in Tehran, Baghdad, and Afghanistan.

According to Iranian officials, including ambassadors (stationed in the greater region), this new rain that has nourished the land is not providential but the result of Iran’s bombings of the gigantic American radars which were simultaneously being used as HAARP systems, tools quite capable of locally modifying the climate.

The Iranian embassy in Kabul posted this unambiguous tweet: “Iran, after destroying a secret cloud seeding and climate manipulation center in the United Arab Emirates, saw everything change overnight. Once this secret center was destroyed, the region’s weather map completely reversed, and now it rains every week in Turkey, Iran, and Iraq, with temperatures dropping by 5 degrees. I don’t know if what they’re saying is true, but there’s a change that everyone is noticing, and temperatures in Iraq haven’t been like this for decades.”

Before the war, and Tehran’s audacious response, two major American activities were likely to alter the climate of the Middle East, not inadvertently but intentionally.

CHEMTRAILS AND WAVES

Until the outbreak of the conflict, military aircraft of the United States and their allies released daily, or several times a week (there are many testimonies on this point), trails which are aptly called chemtrails which covered the sky in a few hours with a milky coating generating a scientifically proven greenhouse effect.

Those with a bit of curiosity observe this same phenomenon in Europe and recall that the contrails left behind by all the planes in the last century lasted no more than a few dozen seconds. Never before had these contrails remained in our atmosphere for more than a minute; never had the sky turned whitish after a flurry of flights. Never.

This has been the case regularly since the 2000s, particularly since the deadly heatwave of 2003. Summers have been hotter, all seasons have suddenly been hotter, sometimes extraordinarily dry, to the point of a telluric change in some regions which has caused the fracturing of tens of thousands of houses built on clay soil.

Most of the hundreds of thousands of daily flights around the world do not produce chemtrails. Just a few hundred aircraft (not commercial airliners, of course) are enough to locally alter the climate, here or there, and cause temperatures to skyrocket. Keen observers will have noticed that these trails crisscross the sky in very calm weather, when their sponsors are certain they won’t be too widely dispersed and therefore ineffective.

As unpleasant as they may be, heat waves, droughts, and mild winters are messages meant for the brainwashed Westerners. They must admit that everything is out of whack because of their own activities, that the Earth is dying because of the carbon dioxide they emit with their diesel cars, their gas boilers, their incessant flatulence, and their horrendous meat-based diet.

The message is crystal clear: you small-time European consumers, you see the damage you’re causing, you careless fools! There are no seasons anymore, you bunch of idiots! The carp have no oxygen in the ponds, the trout have no current in the rivers, the grass is yellow in June, Grandma is suffocating in July, we’re dying of heat in Nantes, everything’s gone to hell. Scrap your gas-powered car, scrap your gas appliances, buy an electric car or a heat pump as soon as you can, install solar panels, demand the energy transition for everyone!

THE IRANIAN TARGET

In the Middle East, there was no message. No one was urging its inhabitants to abandon oil and internal combustion engines. Iran and its surrounding regions were simply a target. A target to be weakened, starved, and destabilized. So that only discontent could flourish, so that hatred against the regime could explode. In addition to the countless economic sanctions imposed upon it, Iran had thus been the target of climate attacks for many years.

For decades, military scientists have known how to dry out and heat entire regions by dusting their airspace with tiny metallic particles (aluminum and others) and water vapor. These particles are agitated by radar waves (which travel at the speed of light) and thus heat up. This temperature increase at the core of the clouds prevents the suspended water from freezing, thus preventing precipitation.

By preventing the movement of crop-dusting aircraft and by neutralizing giant radars (by destroying them), Iran has freed itself (momentarily?) from this “climate” trap.


BETWEEN CONSPIRACY AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES, A TRAP AGAINST IRAN

Tehran, long convinced of the existence of this plot orchestrated by the American-Zionist axis, could not, however, intervene sooner. It would have had to attack both the Americans and the United Arab Emirates first. And no one, apart from the Iranian elite and those in the know, would have believed the motive for its attack: a return to normalcy.

In its self-defense, the Persian regime was able to destroy the massive radar systems in a seemingly, ostensibly, rational move. It was the radars themselves that were eliminated, not radars also used as instruments projecting microwaves to deplete Iran’s resources. The damning accusation of conspiracy could not be leveled against it.

By holding out for so long, by resisting for so long the sanctions and social unrest orchestrated by the enemy, by enduring for so long this extraordinary drought, Iran has won the battle against “conspiracy theories” by avoiding appearing as one of its most obsessive proponents.

We know that Iran quite legitimately believed in this conspiracy, but a war waged to officially combat it would not have been accepted by everyone in a world saturated in the media (even outside the West) and the demonization of “conspiracy theories.” Climate warfare could have brought Iran to its knees, but it was its enemy, who needed this war (which it tried by all means to provoke), who struck first. This is Iran’s greatest success to date.

Nevertheless, it is difficult to believe that the American-Zionist axis has surrendered in this war. Is it trying, or will it try, to rebuild radars designed to manipulate the climate in the same way, or will it use other radars located on other continents? Will it use drones to spray its chemical potion? In short, is the climate war truly over?

If it is not already doing so, Iran now has every interest in communicating on this issue so that it is taken seriously by people around the world. A difficult but vital task.

François-Xavier ROCHETTE.

Francis Goumain Adaptation.

Contact Rivarol : Éditions des Tuileries, 19 avenue d’Italie, 75013 Paris.

 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Francis Goumain https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Francis Goumain2026-05-07 08:46:272026-05-07 08:46:27Iran – End of the Drought & the Destruction of US Radar Installations in the Middle East

Catherine the not Great: Has the Chabad cat got the Irish president’s tongue? (1)

May 6, 2026/10 Comments/in Featured Articles/by Ganainm

Catherine Connolly was elected President of Ireland in October. One in ten of us spoiled our votes, possibly the highest spoiled vote in any European election ever. Many wrote anti-migration and anti-Jewish slogans. Irish Times writer Fintan O’Toole damned her victory with the words “a hollow crown”.

Up to her election she was a passionate friend of the Palestinians. She said that Hamas was part of the fabric of the Palestinian people and even accused the Israelis of financing Hamas.

She has previously voted to boycott Israeli goods. In April 2025, she said in the Dáil “I challenge all of us to stand up and stop the genocide taking place in our name, because we are complicit”

She has visited Syria under Assad and was accused of consorting with terrorists. She had a Muslim Imam, the useless Dr Qadri, at her inauguration.

The Palestinians are pitied and admired in Ireland. Pity that the Jews insist on stealing more of their land every year and massacring them when they object. Admired because despite the tremendous odds they have not yet surrendered. Praising Palestinians and bitching about the Jews is a way to gain votes.

Launching her presidential campaign she stressed Palestinian advocacy and Irish neutrality.

Since the election in October, she has said very little. Her time as president included the various Israeli massacres during the Gaza ceasefire. Many hundreds were killed over the months. Not a peep out of her. Israelis have killed several UN troops in Lebanon and threatened Irish peacekeepers. Despite her role as commander-in-chief of the Irish Defence Forces, she has not said a word about this. Even the attacks on Iran have not tempted her to break her silence.

Oddly, when 14 Jews and an Irishman named Peter Meagher were gunned down on Bondi beach, she issued a statement commiserating with the Jewish people on their loss. Although Peter Meagher is obviously an ethnic Gael, the President of Ireland did not waste one word commiserating with Irish Australians. Bizarre

She also issued an statement on the transgender shooting in Canada. But no statement on the repeated Israeli shootings, tortures, rapes, etc. Dead Jews and dead Canadians deserve a statement, but not dead Palestinians or even dead Irish.

Orwell said it: “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others.”

It is strange that Connolly is so silent on Palestine. The Irish government has already said the Israelis are doing genocide, so there cannot be any problem with her repeating that. Palestine is popular and Jews are unpopular – half the country does not even believe in the full six-million-died-in-gas-chambers Holocaust.

A few carefully chosen supportive words for Palestinians would not damage Catherine Connolly in the eyes of Irish electors. But perhaps it would damage Catherine’s popularity with Jewish selectors?

In fairness, she has very briefly mentioned Palestine occasionally.

In November she mentioned that deceased activist Margaretta D’Arcy was a loyal supporter of the Palestinian people.

In her Christmas message, she said “In particular, we think of the people of Palestine, Ukraine and Sudan.” (She was careful to avoid any mention of Jesus, even though our constitution is explicitly Christian. She is probably aware that religious Jews are offended by the mention of his name…)

She attended an exhibition “Return to Palestine” in December. She met with the group “Run for Palestine” in January. She did not bother to issue any statement.

She went to a high profile “In Defence of Democracy” conference in Barcelona, attended by politicians who have actually banned military supplies to Israel. Even there, she could not mention Palestine, though she mentioned Sudan. Meanwhile, Irish skies are filled with genocide supply flights to Israel.

In April, in a speech to alumni she said: “I know that staff and students of the University of Galway have raised serious concerns over ties between the university and educational institutions in Israel. These concerns cannot be ignored, given our obligations under national and international law.”

It seems that since her election, these are the only full sentences about the Israeli/Palestine conflict she has uttered.

Her own sister is currently on a flotilla to Gaza.

“Twenty-two of the 57 ships were attacked, 180 people detained, including seven Irish citizens. On board the Israeli warship, there was massive violence: activists were bound, dragged across the floor, beaten, kicked, and shot at,” reports communist lecturer Jenny Farrell.

“Please ask that Shannon Airport stop being used by the U.S. military to bomb the hell out of Gaza and Palestine, 95% of the military aid comes from the U.S. and Germany. We totally object to our airspace being used to commit genocide,” said her sister from the flotilla.

Not a whisper of criticism from Connolly about the mistreatment of Irish citizens or even the threat to her own sister. Is blood not thicker than water?

Perhaps the President should take her own advice, or risk being labelled an Israeli collaborator. “I challenge all of us to stand up and stop the genocide taking place in our name, because we are complicit”.

Speak for yourself, Ms President!


Note (1) There is no direct written evidence that Connolly has any links to Chabad, but she makes weird hand signals in photos.

 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Ganainm https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Ganainm2026-05-06 07:54:122026-05-07 08:28:54Catherine the not Great: Has the Chabad cat got the Irish president’s tongue? (1)
Page 26 of 526«‹2425262728›»
RSS Feed Logo RSS Feed Logo Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

Get Our Daily Post Digest
Our latest posts emailed to you every evening.
By subscribing, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of service.

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Topics

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • Link to X
  • Link to Dribbble
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only