• MISSION STATEMENT
  • TERMS
  • PRIVACY
The Occidental Observer
  • HOME
  • BLOG
  • SUBSCRIBE TOQ
  • CONTACT USPlease send all letters to the editor, manuscripts, promotional materials, and subscription questions to Editors@TheOccidentalObserver.net.
  • DONATE
  • Search
  • Menu Menu

Featured Articles

The Carlson-Cooper Podcast: A Major Step Forward

September 7, 2024/34 Comments/in Featured Articles, Jewish Influence/by Kevin MacDonald
Tucker Carlson has often been the subject of commentaries on this site, some quite negative, although I have tended toward his defense while calling attention to some of his blind spots, mostly involving race and Jewish influence. However, quite simply, Carlson has been by far the edgiest voice among mainstream conservatives.  This interview marks a major step forward and has resulted in outrage from some of the usual suspects such as from the Biden Administration, the ADL (J.D. Vance sought to “distancee the candidate from the interview).  Among the “numerous columnists” (according to CNN) who condemned the interview was Jewish activist and New York Times columnist Michelle Goldberg. Two things particularly angered Goldberg. First:
This clever rhetorical formulation, familiar to various strands of right-wing propaganda, flatters listeners for their willingness to reject all they’ve learned from mainstream experts, making them feel brave and savvy for imbibing absurdities. Cooper proceeded, in a soft-spoken, faux-reasonable way, to lay out an alternative history in which Hitler tried mightily to avoid war with Western Europe, Churchill was a “psychopath” propped up by Zionist interests, and millions of people in concentration camps “ended up dead” because the overwhelmed Nazis didn’t have the resources to care for them. Elon Musk promoted the conversation as “very interesting” on his platform X, though he later deleted the tweet.”

I don’t have the background to comment on Hitler’s attempts to avoid a war or the beginnings of concentration camps, but of course we do know that Churchill’s profligacy and chronic indebtedness was funded by wealthy Jews who desperately wanted war with Hitler, as the articles by Horus and other accounts clearly show. The relevant passage in the interview is very brief but Goldberg fastened upon it and, at least to my hearing, Cooper seems uncomfortable discussing it. Needless to say, Goldberg does not attempt a rebuttal for any of these points or give any citations to people who could.

On Carlson’s website the interview is titled “The Fall of Europe” and subtitled: “Darryl Cooper: The True History of the Jonestown Cult, WWII, and How Winston Churchill Ruined Europe.”

The offending material starts with a comment on Jewish involvement in Bolshevism based on Churchill’s famous article from 1920 advocating that Jews embrace Zionism rather than Bolshevism but noting that many Jews got caught up in it, and Cooper agrees. Here are the relevant parts of Churchill’s article:

International Jews

In violent opposition to all this sphere of Jewish effort [i.e., Jews who are nationalists in the nations they reside in] rise the schemes of the international Jews. The adherents of this sinister confederacy are mostly men reared up among the unhappy populations of countries where Jews are persecuted on account of their race. Most, if not all. of them have forsaken the faith of their forefathers, and divorced from their minds all spiritual hopes of the next world. This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus—Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown. a definitely recognisable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.

Terrorist Jews.

There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very, great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff. And the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek, all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses. The same evil prominence was obtained by Jews in the brief period of terror during which Bela Kun ruled in Hungary. The same phenomenon has been presented in Germany (especially in Bavaria), so far as this madness has been allowed to prey upon the temporary prostration of the German people. Although in all these countries there are many non-Jews every whit as bad as the worst of the Jewish revolutionaries, the part played by the latter in proportion to their numbers in the population is astonishing,

So Churchill was aware of the evils of Bolshevism and the intensive Jewish involvement in it but cooperated with the Jews financing his lifestyle in order to destroy Hitler whose crimes paled in comparison with those of the Bolsheviks, at the very least in the 1930s. Needless to say, Goldberg and her ilk never refer to Jewish domination of the Soviet Union in the decades after the Revolution.

The following machine translation has been edited to try to make sense out of a mess (Tucker needs to hire an editor), but you get the idea.


Darryl Cooper: Churchill wrote a kind of infamous now article called Zionism Versus Bolshevism. And he [Churchill] basically makes the case  — which was which was true to a large extent that all of Eastern Europe — that the Pale of Settlement, which is where the vast majority of Jews lived other than the United States, which is where a lot of them had had traveled to that area had become so engulfed by a revolutionary spirit that all of the young Ashkenazi Jews who were over there were getting swept up into it. It was the 60s here on steroids, right? [Perhaps suggesting Jews were deeply involved in the 1960s counter-cultural revolution throughout the West — which they were.] And in a much more serious and destructive way. And this is 1920. So shortly after the Bolshevik Revolution.

Basically, the point of his paper is he says, these people who over there they’re all going one direction or the other. They’re going to be Bolsheviks. They’re going to be Zionists. We want them to be Zionists, you know? And so we need to support this. And so that was early on. There was an ideological component of it. But then as time goes on, you know, you read stories about Churchill going bankrupt and needing money. Getting bailed out by people who shared his interests, you know, in terms of Zionism, but also, his hostility. Just, just. You know, I think his hostility, to put it this way, I think his hostility to Germany was real. I don’t think that he necessarily had to be bribed to have that feeling. But, you know, I think he was, to an extent, put in place by people, the financiers, by a media complex that wanted to make sure that he was the guy who, you know, who was representing Britain in that conflict for, for the, for a reason. And you know, Churchill’s a… Again, it’s so hard. Because like, you know, especially in a short interview like this where you have this guy. Who? I mean, he’s an Abraham Lincoln-, George Washington-, Martin Luther King-like type figure in the sort of Western consciousness, right?

Tucker [00:57:09] Yes.

Darryl Cooper [00:57:10] And so people have so many assumptions in built-in triggers, like when it comes to this guy, that it’s hard to talk about it because you’re always thinking about the triggers that you’re setting off and your listeners. And I don’t say that in a way of like, I don’t want to offend anybody. No, no, I understand it’s that it’s, you know, you know, that things are going to be misunderstood. And so this is why I do 30, our podcast.

Tucker [00:57:31] Well, it’s just it’s interesting because I, you know, as a follower of your work, I don’t see you as hostile to the West. I see you actually as a product of the West and as a defender, really of the West for its values. You know, in your approach, in your open mindedness, rigor, you know, belief in accuracy and honesty and those are Western notions. And yet Churchill has been positioned and has been and really is accepted as like the defender of the West over the last 100 years.

Darryl Cooper [00:58:02] Yeah.

Tucker [00:58:03] And so maybe that’s and I wonder why that is. I don’t I mean, people can certainly take issue with any factual claims you’re making. I assume they’re all right. They’re consistent with what I think I know to be true. But why do you think Churchill has been presented in a way, in the way that he has?

In other words, Tucker has long known this about the roots of World War II, Jewish involvement in it, and Churchill’s role in producing this disaster.

Darryl Cooper [00:58:22]  Well, it’s it has to do with what you said earlier, right? Neville Chamberlain versus Churchill has been the binary model that has served as the chief rhetorical device for every conflict we’ve wanted to get into since then. Yes. You know, the entire Cold War. And then even after the Cold War, in the global war on terror is if you appease them, you’re Neville Chamberlain. Hitler’s the, rather, Churchill’s the one who saw all along where this was headed and was trying to warn people this, you know, Cassandra. And finally, because nobody listened to him, the war ended up breaking out and we were forced to, like, go stamp out this threat. And now it’s a….much bigger threat than it ever would have been if we just …

Tucker [00:59:05] Put a listing, say, if we had strangled it in its

Darryl Cooper [00:59:07] Crib and it’s justified every conflict, you know, really, since the Second World War, everybody’s the new Hitler, right? It’s you know, it really did become the founding myth of the of the global order that we’re all living in now. Right?

*   *   *

The other big problem for Goldberg (also predictable):
Toward the end of their conversation, Carlson and Cooper discussed how the “postwar European order” has enabled mass immigration, which has, in Carlson’s telling, destroyed Western Europe. “So why not have a Nuremberg trial for the people who did that?” asked Carlson. “I don’t understand. I mean, that’s such a crime.”
“Well,” Cooper responded, “we have to win first.”

Goldberg’s column ends there. For the Michelle Goldbergs of the world, the worst thing that could happen would be for people to realize that Western cultures and peoples are in the process of suicide and that Jews are influential advocates of this process. Here’s the relevant transcript edited for clarity because the machine transcription is a mess:

Tucker Carlson:  “I just can’t get over the fact that the West won and is completely destroyed in less than a century. … Somehow the United States and Western Europe won. That’s the conventional understanding. And both now look like they lost a World War. So, like, what the hell was that? Like, there’s something very, very heavy.

Darryl Cooper [02:08:46] Yeah. I mean, it’s all the things that we have been talking about. [Presumably a reference to Jewish involvement in Bolshevism, Hitler’s campaign against Bolshevism, the Jewish-financed campaign against Hitler and its ensuing media-and academic-manufactured mythology, as well as the 1960s counter-cultural revolution, massive non-White immigration, and multiculturalism.] And probably some things that, you know, we only talk about privately, but we can see the results of it. I mean.

“We only talk about privately. A revealing statement. It’s pretty clearly a reference to the disastrous consequences that await anyone who dares to question the consensus and an oblique reference to Jewish power that is so instrumental in suppressing ideas that they don’t like, especially any ideas that seriously discuss Jewish power.

Tucker [02:08:58] Yeah. So that’s that’s the real question. If they were trying to achieve that destruction that you’re talking about, if they if they were trying, they couldn’t have done it more directly or more effectively, you know. And so, there are trends in forces. There are things that drive people, you know, like incentives to drive people that they’re not aware of. There’s a lot of things going on.

So no clear reference to Jewish influence, but he’s certainly right about incentives that are so attractive to so many non-Jews, particularly politicians and others with aspirations to power, that smooth the way for traitorous behavior by so many White people. I have argued that the Jewish motive is quite clear: They feel safer in a multicultural, non-White majority country as an antidote to what happened in White, Christian Germany beginning in 1933.

Tucker around 2:05: So when can just tie a bow in [your] World War Two project? … I think it’s like it’s central to the society we live in, the myths upon which it’s built. I think it’s also the cause of like the destruction of Western civilization and these lies.

Absolutely right.

I should also mention a tidbit from an Alex Berenson blog — Berenson being the Covid dissident who was on Tucker’s Fox News show several times. Berenson:

And just weeks ago, when I heard that Tucker said on a podcast that my “indispensable quality is bravery,” I was genuinely thrilled. Which is why it hurt to hear Tucker playing footsie on his incredibly popular podcast this week with Darryl Cooper, a historian who is a Nazi apologist and — at best — walks to the edge of Holocaust denial.

To take a recent example, Cooper posted on X that the Nazi occupation of Paris was “infinitely preferable” to the (admittedly idiotic and offensive) opening ceremony of the Olympics in July. The Nazi occupation of Paris led to over 70,000 French Jews being sent to gas chambers. (Cooper later deleted the post.)

So Cooper is definitely on page with the idea that World War II has led to the disastrous consequences we see in the contemporary West in terms of cultural degradation and, on the basis of the above, on being colonized by the Third World. Of course, Berenson (and the rest of the critics) never bother to consider the consequences to the people and culture of the West as a result of the World War II mythos being so entrenched in the West, much less give any serious analysis of the Jewish role in establishing and maintaining it.

This interview is a big step forward in bringing these ideas into the mainstream. One wonders if Carlson did it in hopes of influencing the looming election in which immigration and multiculturalism are definitely on the minds of a great many voters. (Carlson is doing a 16-date cross-country tour in September, including a show with J.D. Vance on September 21.)  Perhaps he understands that there is not much time left and that we have to make a stand against the onslaught we are facing.  And a necessary part of taking a stand would be to change the public’s attitudes on the origins of World War II and on Jewish power and influence.

Of course, there will be consequences, but in retrospect, Tucker getting fired from Fox News is definitely a big positive. He never could have said anything like this on Fox. It’s not clear what the powers that be can do to Carlson, but for the ADL and the rest of establishment media figures, this is Armageddon — a battle they can’t afford to lose. They will pull out all the stops to prevent it from becoming mainstream in conservative circles.

But some people are just too big to completely bury and his alliance with Elon Musk and Musk’s ownership of X is a big plus. Any conservative who is remotely paying attention realizes that the formidable power of the Jewish community is firmly aligned with the Democrats as it has been for decades.

We’ll see. It will be a nice test of Jewish power. Believe me, they won’t take this lying down.


Here’s Goldberg’s screed:

Tucker Carlson and the Heterodoxy-to-Holocaust Denial Pipeline

Tucker Carlson stands at a microphone and raises his hand. Behind him is a huge screen showing the same image.
Credit…Thalassa Raasch
Michelle Goldberg

By Michelle Goldberg

This week Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News star who now hosts one of America’s top podcasts, had an apologist for Adolf Hitler on his show. Darryl Cooper, who runs a history podcast and newsletter called Martyr Made, considers Winston Churchill, not Hitler, the chief villain of World War II. In a social media post that he’s since deleted, Cooper argued that a Paris occupied by the Nazis was “infinitely preferable in virtually every way” to the city on display during the opening ceremony of the recent summer Olympics, where a drag queen performance infuriated the right. On his show, Carlson introduced Cooper to listeners as “the most important popular historian working in the United States today.”

Over the course of a wide-ranging two-hour conversation, Cooper presented the mainstream history of World War II as a mythology shrouded in taboos intended to prop up a corrupt liberal political order. The idea that Nazi Germany represented the epitome of evil, argued Cooper, is such a “core part of the state religion” that we have “emotional triggers” preventing us from examining the past dispassionately.

This clever rhetorical formulation, familiar to various strands of right-wing propaganda, flatters listeners for their willingness to reject all they’ve learned from mainstream experts, making them feel brave and savvy for imbibing absurdities. Cooper proceeded, in a soft-spoken, faux-reasonable way, to lay out an alternative history in which Hitler tried mightily to avoid war with Western Europe, Churchill was a “psychopath” propped up by Zionist interests, and millions of people in concentration camps “ended up dead” because the overwhelmed Nazis didn’t have the resources to care for them. Elon Musk promoted the conversation as “very interesting” on his platform X, though he later deleted the tweet.

Some on the right found Carlson’s turn toward Holocaust skepticism surprising. “Didn’t expect Tucker Carlson to become an outlet for Nazi apologetics, but here we are,” Erick Erickson, the conservative radio host, wrote on X. But Carlson’s trajectory was entirely predictable. Nazi sympathy is the natural endpoint of a politics based on glib contrarianism, right-wing transgression and ethnic grievance.

There are few better trolls, after all, than Holocaust deniers, who love to pose as heterodox truth-seekers oppressed by Orwellian elites. (The wildly antisemitic Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust named its journal “An Inconvenient History: A Quarterly Journal for Free Historical Inquiry.”) Those who deny or downplay the Holocaust often excel at mimicking the forms and language of legitimate scholarship, using them to undermine rather than explore reality. They blitz their opponents with out-of-context historical detail and bad-faith questions, and they know how to use crude provocation to get attention.
Long before 4Chan existed, the disgraced Holocaust-denying author David Irving urged his followers, in an early 1990s speech, to break through the “appalling pseudo-religious atmosphere” surrounding World War II by being aggressively tasteless. “You’ve got to say things like: ‘More women died on the back seat of Senator Edward Kennedy’s car at Chappaquiddick than died in the gas chamber at Auschwitz,’” he said.

Until quite recently, American conservatives mostly maintained antibodies against Irving-style disinformation. Right-wing thought leaders generally shared the same broad historical understanding of World War II as the rest of society, felt patriotic pride at America’s role in it and viewed Hitler as metaphysically wicked. Rather than recognizing the way right-wing politics, taken to extremes, could shade into National Socialism, they would hurl Nazi comparisons at the left, as the conservative columnist Jonah Goldberg did in his 2008 book “Liberal Fascism.”

Goldberg’s approach was dishonest, but it was representative of a broad antifascist consensus in American politics. Cooper is, in fact, correct that abhorrence of Nazism has helped structure Western societies. If we could agree on nothing else, we could agree that part of the job of liberal democracy was to erect bulwarks against the emergence of Hitler-like figures.

For parts of the contemporary right, however, the social consensuses undergirding liberalism are artificial and even tyrannical. After all, the “Matrix”-derived metaphor of being “red-pilled” implies a realization that all you’ve been told about the nature of reality is a lie, and thus everything is up for grabs. And once you discard all epistemological and moral guardrails, it’s easy to descend into barbarous nonsense.

Candace Owens, another anti-woke right-wing celebrity who has lately become Hitler-curious, has also come to question received wisdom about the shape of the earth. “I’m not a flat-earther,” she said in July. “I’m not a round-earther. Actually, what I am is I am somebody who has left the cult of science.”

Obviously, not every red-pilled conservative ends up arguing, as Owens did, that Hitler gets a bad rap. But the weakening of the intellectual quarantine around Nazism — and the MAGA right’s fetish for ideas their enemies see as dangerous — makes it easier for influential conservatives to surrender to fascist impulses. When they do, they pay no penalty in political relevance, because there’s no conservative establishment capable of disciplining its ideologues.

Carlson has just embarked on a national tour with special guests at each stop. In addition to Alex Jones, he’s scheduled to appear with the vice-presidential nominee JD Vance and Donald Trump Jr.

Ultimately, Holocaust denial isn’t really about history at all, but about what’s permissible in the present and imaginable in the future. If Hitler is no longer widely understood as the negation of our deepest values, America will be softened up for Donald Trump’s most authoritarian plans, including imprisoning masses of undocumented immigrants in vast detention camps.

Toward the end of their conversation, Carlson and Cooper discussed how the “postwar European order” has enabled mass immigration, which has, in Carlson’s telling, destroyed Western Europe. “So why not have a Nuremberg trial for the people who did that?” asked Carlson. “I don’t understand. I mean, that’s such a crime.”

“Well,” Cooper responded, “we have to win first.”

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-09-07 09:40:042024-09-08 08:17:35The Carlson-Cooper Podcast: A Major Step Forward

Yamakazi Jews: They Hate Whites More than They Love Themselves

September 5, 2024/27 Comments/in Anti-Semitism, Featured Articles/by Spencer J. Quinn

During war it is often appropriate to attack despite putting oneself in great danger by doing so. If one can score a knockout blow, thereby ending the hostilities, the risk becomes justified. In such circumstances, victory is everything, and second place is not an option—even though it is obviously the only other one.

But what if there is no war? What if there are no men in uniform shooting each other, no airplanes or drones dropping deadly fire from the sky, no ships or submarines outmaneuvering each other on the high seas—and still there’s a subset of a population bent on attacking another, even when it is against their interests to do so? This encapsulates much of the Jewish Question, and what European Whites have been forced to deal with since their Jewish minorities had been emancipated in the late nineteenth century.

Before the formation of Israel, it could have been argued that the Jewish diaspora was acting in its best interests by opposing gentile nativism in America and many parts of Europe. Maybe. These days, however, with Jews being the per-capita wealthiest minority in the United States and with a nuclear-armed Israel thriving and receiving billions in free aid, this is no longer the case. To hurt America and to contribute to its decline through illegal immigration and openly anti-White policies, is to risk ultimately harming the successful Jewish diaspora. Yet the Jewish elite continues to do this very thing through its unwavering support of the Democrat Party.

I have a name for such suicidal/genocidal Jews: Yamakazis. Such Jews ignore or downplay the often vicious anti-Semitism or anti-Zionism of their non-White allies in order to press the attack upon their ultimate bête noir—or bête blanch, if you will—White people.

It’s as if they hate White people more than they love themselves. They must feel that they are at war with Whites—despite Whites not being at war with them. I’m reminded of how Jewish Avant garde composer Arnold Schoenberg eschewed having his atonal works performed during the First World War, given how detested they were by the Czech public. But peacetime was another matter. In a letter, he once wrote [emphasis mine]:

. . .surely, it isn’t cowardly if I now try to avoid that sort of thing. In peace-time—which means war-time for me—I am quite prepared to go back to being everyone’s whipping boy, and everyone who is accounted indispensable today will be welcome to lash out at whatever bit of me he thinks most vulnerable. But for the present—more than ever—I should like to keep out of the limelight.[1]

More apropos might be what Jewish banker and Bolshevik financier Jacob Schiff once said after his 1911 meeting with President William Taft in which he attempted to persuade Taft to abrogate a trade agreement with Russia. Schiff wanted to punish Russia for its discriminatory treatment of Jews. When Taft refused, Schiff reportedly declared to one of his allies—in classic Daffy Duck fashion—“This means war!”

Such all-consuming truculence was on display recently during the Democratic National Convention in Chicago when members of the Jewish political elite, such as New York Senator Chuck Schumer, Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro, Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband Doug Emhoff, stood in front of cameras and proclaimed their loyalty to a political party which is growing as anti-Semitic as it already is anti-White. They made nary a mention of Israel’s war in Gaza and the violent backlash Jews have been facing over it from the Left—especially the Muslim Left. During the proceedings in Chicago, however, this was made impossible to ignore.

According to the Washington Free Beacon:

On Tuesday, pro-Hamas agitators disrupted a DNC event with hostage families hosted by Agudath Israel of America, an Orthodox Jewish group. The protesters shouted, “Zionism has got to fall” and “Shame on you” at attendees. Dozens of anti-Israel protesters were also arrested after clashing with police near the convention Tuesday night.

Meanwhile, it was see no evil and hear no evil from the Jewish elite, as represented by Schumer, who pointed to his blue lapel pin and claimed he was wearing it to “stand up to antisemitism.” But, of course, he was looking in the wrong direction. Outside, a mob of incensed anti-Semites was practically screaming bloody murder against Israel and Jews, yet Schumer would rather vent his wrath at affirmed Israel ally and philo-Semite Donald Trump:

As the highest-ranking Jewish elected official in American history, I want my grandkids and all grandkids to never, never face discrimination because of who they are. But Donald Trump—this is a guy who peddled antisemitic stereotypes. He even invited a White supremacist to Mar-a-Lago.

And according to Daniel Greenfield of Front Page, no one at the DNC denounced the unruly Jew haters, either for being unruly or for hating Jews. Joe Biden even admitted they had a point. The American Free Thinker also made the most of Schumer’s hypocrisy when whining about anti-Semitism while remaining on excellent terms with noted anti-Semite Al Sharpton.

As if this weren’t remarkable enough, however, something unheard of occurred at this year’s DNC: Jews had to meet in secret for their own security. That is how dangerous it has gotten for them in the political party they fund and pull leftward, always leftward. According to the Washington Free Beacon, Jewish groups acting on the periphery of the DNC had to act very carefully indeed:

The Jewish Democratic Council of America held panel discussions with former U.S. ambassador to Spain Alan Solomont and Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D., Fla.), but attendees were required to register before receiving the location. Private security and metal detectors were present at both events.

The Israeli-American Council only disclosed the location for its “Hostage Square” discussion to attendees a few hours before it started, the Times of Israel reported on Wednesday.

So let’s get this straight: actual anti-Semitism is happening at the 2024 DNC which forces Jews to meet in secret to avoid violent encounters with anti-Semites to whom their own party openly caters, and the highest ranking Jew in the US government can’t find anything better to complain about than how Donald Trump once had a dinner at his home crashed by a supposed “White supremacist.” In other words, I, Spencer J. Quinn, by virtue of writing this essay for this website, am a greater threat to world Jewry than people who are willing to go jail for violently protesting the very fact that Israel exists. The internal consistency of my arguments, the amount of verifiable evidence I bring to the table, the fact that I am arguing in good faith—all mean nothing to people like Schumer.

There is zero credibility here, as usual. But this past DNC has taken it to a whole other level. Never before has the suicidal nature of the Jewish diaspora elite been in starker focus.

Chuck Schumer is a kamikaze Jew. He is a Yamakazi. He only knows one thing: to attack, regardless of what this will do to his own people. When it comes down to the aleph and tau of the Jewish Question, people like Shumer care little about real anti-Semitism—just as they care little about the welfare of other Jews. First and foremost, they care about hating White people. And since Donald Trump has become the avatar of White America, they unload all their ammo at him.

After all, this is what you do during a war.

But this is a cowardly, undeclared war. I wonder if Chuck Schumer proudly stands up to antisemitism on the Right only because that is where it is indeed weakest. But where it is strongest, that is, on the Left and right under his hooked nose, he keeps as quiet as a mouse.

There’s a lesson in here somewhere, folks.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Spencer J. Quinn https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Spencer J. Quinn2024-09-05 08:26:482024-09-05 08:53:39Yamakazi Jews: They Hate Whites More than They Love Themselves

Excerpt from William Gayley Simpson’s, “Which Way Western Man?” (1978)

September 3, 2024/18 Comments/in Anti-Jewish Writing, Featured Articles, General/by Kevin MacDonald

Editor’s note: An interesting, heterodox take on the typical mainstream narrative of post-World War II Soviet anti-Semitism. This is Appendix 4 of Which Way Western Man (1978).

Previously on TOO: Robert S. Griffin’s “William Gayley Simpson on Christianity and the West.” Griffin gives a an account of  Simpson’s life and his relationship with William Pierce.

Appendix 4

‘Alleged Soviet Anti-Semitism’

Much has been made of a “Soviet anti-Semitism” that is alleged to have been initiated by Stalin. Those who hold to this view call attention to the Czech purge of 1953, the year of Stalin’s death, in which nine of the eleven men executed were Jews. In reply to this, and further, as a background for what I want to say about the years that have followed, I can hardly do better than to quote some comments from competent observers of that period. The first are taken from Gothic Ripples, Nos. 96, 97, and 98 of the year 1953, by Mr. Arnold S. Leese, whom I have found an exceedingly exact and reliable investigator. (Gothic Ripples has been defunct since Mr. Leese’s death, but I have a complete file of it.) In No. 96 he wrote:

“Recently in Czechoslovakia there has been a drastic purge of officials anxious to be their own bosses, like Tito in Jugoslavia. Now, you can’t purge Bolshevists without purging Jews; in Stalin’s great purges in Russia (1935-8) the victims were nearly all Jews, but there were always plenty of Jews left to carry on Bolshevism. To the alarm of world Jewry, it could not be hidden from the public that in this new Czechoslovakian purge, the officials arrested were nearly all Jews. Actually, we know for certain that twelve out of the fourteen were Jews. . .”

And then he lists the posts that these Jews held. One is struck at once by the fact that they were anything but Jewish nonentities. On the contrary, they included Rudolph Slansky, Vice-Premier of Czechoslovakia and Secretary-General of the Communist Party; and also the Deputy Secretary-General, numerous deputy Ministers (of Finance, National Defense, Foreign Trade and Foreign Affairs), a local secretary of the Communist Party, and a member of the editorial staff of Rude Pravo, the official organ of the Communist Party.

“In these facts,” resumes Mr. Leese, “not in the fact of their sentences, you have the proof that Bolshevism is Jewish in Czechoslovakia. But the most significant fact of all is that the Minister of Justice who ordered the execution of the condemned eleven men (of whom nine were Jews) was Stefan Reis, recognized by the Jewish Chronicle [one of the leading Jewish periodicals of England] of 5th May, 1950, as a Jew himself!”

How can anyone conceive that so many Jews could have attained posts of such eminence and influence in a Communist country and in the Communist Party if there had been any mounting feeling against Jews on the part of the Government?

In the next issue of Gothic Ripples (No. 97), Mr. Leese comments on the readiness with which gentiles the world over had swallowed the Jewish brainwash of Soviet anti-Semitism. “Let us just remind everyone that Stalin married a Jewess, whilst his daughter married in 1951 a Jew; that in the recent Czechoslovakian purge the Minister of Justice was the Jew, S. Reis; that two Jews, E. Pollak and Jaroslav Simon, have just been decorated in Soviet Russia for agricultural services; . . . while at the Jewish Board of Deputies meeting on the same date [1.18.53], a far-sighted Jew, A. Wolffe, who knew this lie of anti-Semitism in Russia would come back on the Jews like a boomerang, said to his fellow tribesmen, ‘You know, as I know, that there is no anti-semitism in Eastern Europe.’ The whole idea is puerile. Even in Rumania, the Jewess Anna Pauker has been replaced by another Jew, A. Bughici.”

And Gothic Ripples No. 98 records that the Jewish Chronicle, 2.13.53, had reported that Vol. 15 of the Soviet Encyclopaedia published that month, had declared that “the Jewish problem does not exist in the Soviet Union, where today Jews find the doors open to all professions.” It adds, after pointing to the Jewishness of the Government in Hungary, “you can only purge a Jewish Government by purging Jews from it.” A succinct note in Time magazine, March 2, 1953, confirmed this. In regard to the expected purge of Jews in Communist Hungary, it sifted down the reports to mean “that a Russian purge tribunal has gone to Hungary to root out ‘suspected Zionists’ from the strongly Jewish (90% in the top echelons) government of Communist Premier Matyas Rakosi, who is himself a Jew.”

Free Britain for March 15, 1953 (No. 135) brought out another side of the matter:

“For thirty-five years the Russian people have been exploited and pillaged by the Soviet Government

“Never has it been allowed to occur to the Russian masses that they have a Jewish Government, although this is known to be the case.” [With this compare Americans’ unawareness of the Jewishness of our Government for the past 50 years!]

“If once the Russian people were to awake to the fact they had been ruled for all these years by the one people whom they detest most of all, the Soviet Government would be faced with a domestic upheaval that might end the regime.

“The Russians have always detested the Jews, and the main reason for all the secrecy behind the Iron Curtain, for the secret police, for the censorship of the Press and for the concentration camps is to prevent the Russians learning that their country is ruled by Jews.

“That is why two years ago Free Britain pointed out that ‘the soft underbelly of the Soviet Monster is the Jewish Question.’

“Now in spite of all precautions the Russian people are beginning to learn the truth, and it has become an urgent matter for their Jewish masters to throw dust in their eyes. They have found it necessary to sacrifice some of their own people, as of old, and to give the widest publicity, in an effort to make their actions appear anti-Jewish.

“By its actions the Soviet Government has shown beyond any shadow of doubt the one thing it fears above everything else is that its Jewishness should become known to the Russian people.”

But there are those who claim that no matter what may have been the official Soviet attitude toward Jews 15 or 20 years ago, mounting evidence for the past decade has conclusively proved this to be hostile. In reply to this, I would submit such indications as the following:

1. On Sept. 30, 1960, the B’nai B’rith Messenger, official organ of one of the most powerful Jewish institutions in the world, published this “exclusive United Nations WUP report”:

“A.I. Mikoyan has officially denied that any form of anti-Semitism exists today in the Soviet Union, a Soviet Embassy revealed this week

“Take, for example, the list of members of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR. How many Jews are on it? There are most likely relatively more of them than representatives of other nationalities.

“My brother is an aircraft designer and he works with Gurevitch, a Jew by nationality. Their plan is called ‘MIG,’ that is, Mikoyan and Gurevich. I don’t consider this an instance of anti-Semitism.

“There are many Jews among the artists. . . . Talented Jews have wide opportunities for the development of their gifts. There are many Jews among the film directors, artists, screen players, composers, musicians, writers, and also in offices, in ministries, in the Army. They hold high posts. We have, for example, General of the Army Kreiser, a very respected man, a Jew by nationality. I know him personally.

“Engineer Dymshitz is likewise a Jew. He is minister in charge of all capital construction in the Soviet Union.”

  1. Mr. A.K. Chesterton, who has made it part of his business to be informed about all matters vitally pertaining to Jews, in a personal letter to me dated June 11, 1973, wrote:

 “The Soviet Union has always been anti-Zionist, and nonetheless so because it procured tens of thousands of Polish Jews for export to Palestine in 1946. . .

“Heaven knows that I am no champion of the Soviet regime, but it does have my sympathy in recognizing that dual loyalty in the eyes of Zionist Jews is a deceptive phrase to cover up single-minded loyalty to Israel. As far as I am aware, Russian Jews have no specific complaint against the regime except its discouragement of emigration.” [Emphasis added.]

Please note that this brings us up to a few months ago.

  1. The South African Observer (Box 2401, Pretoria, South Africa), in its issue for February 1973, had a significant note about the activities of Walter B. Kissinger, a brother of Henry Kissinger. Walter is a millionaire American industrialist, who is also the head of a West German firm, the Rohe Company, “which is negotiating a contract involving over $125 million with the Soviet Union to build and equip five hundred gasoline stations in and around Moscow.” This hardly supports the idea that Jews have any deep grievance against the Soviet Government.
  2. But to my mind what completely silences the idea that the Russian Government has done anything that has seriously alienated Jewish affections and support, is the well-established fact that, although the United States and all the other major nations of the West has been under steadily increasing Jewish control for the past fifty years, every one of them, and the U.S. most of all, has consistently done whatever was necessary to prevent Russian collapse. What organized Jewry can do, and leaps to do, when it really feels itself confronted by an enemy, was made fearfully plain by the vengeance it heaped upon Hitler and Germany. Beside this, any resentment Jews may feel toward Russia looks pretty pallid. And if at first one be disturbed by noticing, for instance, that the New York Times “every day seems to run a scheduled attack on the Russian Government,” one needs to remember that the Jews stand out in history as the great masters of deception. With their undisputed control of the mass media they are in a position to fabricate whatever reports they will, as a smokescreen to cover up their real designs: they can make us think they are about to move in one direction, when in fact they intend to move in the opposite. Above all, there is the fact, behind which Dr. Antony Sutton has put such mountains of indisputable evidence (as already detailed in my text), that since Stalin as much as before him, it has been the Jew-controlled U.S.A. that is chiefly responsible for having built up the Russian regime, prevented its collapse, and maintained it in power. Most recently, “when the last Soviet famine threatened as the result of yet another failure of collectivized agriculture, Dr. Kissinger [himself a Jew born abroad], whose power base is the international financial groups whose interests he has faithfully served, rushed to Moscow . . . to offer the necessary credits to enable American wheat to be shipped to the Soviet Union. 700 million dollars were provided.”[1] Russia got the wheat by American taxpayers’ having to go short of wheat for themselves. They got it without actually paying a cent for it. They got it “on the cuff,” by a mere promise to pay for it, a promise on which they may be counted to renege, as they reneged on their obligation to pay off their debt to the U.S. of 11 billion dollars for Lend Lease.

All this shows actual favoritism toward Communist Soviet Russia, and is inconceivable on the part of a Jew-controlled U.S. Government, except as the Soviet Union not only had the approval of American Jewry but enjoyed its active support.

This favoritism, as revealed in the apparent attitude of the U.S. Government to a recent Russian military move, was commented on in the London Financial Times of April 22, 1974:

“No one without access to the inner councils of the Kremlin can say, of course, that Russia would not have mounted this considerable new military effort if the U.S. had not been willing to act as its extremely indulgent international banker. But what cannot be denied is that, by granting the Soviet greatly extended access to American money and resources, President Nixon’s detente has made it very much easier than it would otherwise have been for Russia to cope with the additional stresses its intensified military effort must be imposing on the country’s external payments and domestic economic situation.”

And as a final observation bearing on the alleged anti-Semitism of the Russian Government, I must add a note about the so-called Dartmouth Conferences. Eight of these have been held since the first in 1960, half in the U.S., half in Russia. They have all been held in secret under extreme security precautions. Money to cover the expenses incurred has almost always been supplied by the large American tax-exempt foundations, notably the Ford Foundation. The delegates are exclusively from the U.S. and Russia. They are persons of very great power and influence in the worlds of finance, politics, science, education, and all the means for shaping the public mind. They manifestly work, like the Bilderberger Group, in close liaison with the Council on Foreign Relations, all of which further the same ends. They are obviously an instrument for bringing together in particular the U.S. and Russia, to combine their forces for the destruction of national sovereignties and to create a homogenized world most advantageous to money-making and favorable to the dominion of the Earth by bankers.

But the point of particular importance here is that a large number of the names of the Russian delegates to the Dartmouth Conferences have been Jewish. This, it would seem, makes it undeniable that “racial Jews still have great power and influence in the Soviet totalitarian dictatorship.” See Youth Action News, August 1974, at the bottom of page 7. (Box 312, Alexandria, Virginia 22313.)

I readily allow that there may be indications that do not fit in with the view that I have presented here. And perhaps I could not answer every such contrary indication. But I must heed my very painful awareness both of the fearful importance of our not being taken in, and of the Jews’ need of deception for the accomplishment of their ends, and of their genius for it. Our very existence as a nation, and as a people, may depend on our discerning clearly, beneath all appearances to the contrary, what is really going on. But let it be my final word that the danger, as I see it, is not so much from what apparently emanates from Russia, as from the Jewish International Money Power that works partly behind and through it, and always for the destruction of the White man everywhere—in the United States, in Russia, in Britain, in Europe, throughout Africa, in Australia, and in New Zealand. And nowhere has it ever been truer that if we don’t hang together, all of us White men, we shall certainly hang separately. And the hangman will be the Jew.

Part C, Section 38: ‘The Solution of the Jewish Problem’

I now set before my readers the conclusions to which twenty-five years of investigation and reflection have forced me. If there is anything about these conclusions that is unsupported by facts, or contrary to the spirit of fair play and justice, I shall be glad to have it pointed out to me how and where.

  1. The Jewish people, taken as a whole, are never to be trusted. It has been born in them, and drilled into them too deeply, that first of all and above all else they are Jews, and therefore their first loyalty is to Jewry, to their own kind anywhere and everywhere. That means loyalty to Zionism, to Israel or to any other center to which Jews can rally and which is working for their advancement as a people. There are, of course, exceptions, striking and moving exceptions, and they may be more numerous than I realize, but it is never possible to tell in advance which ones are going to be loyal to the country of their adoption, and which will not. In any case, it does not make sense to base a policy on what, it has to be admitted, is the exception.
  2. They will never be assimilated, never, anywhere. They have proved themselves to be very adaptable almost everywhere. But not assimilable. Their identity, and therefore their existence as a people, depends upon their never mixing their genes with those of another race. That individual Jews will do so does not alter the fact that to the Jewish community as a whole this must ever seem betrayal and treason, and that if most Jews followed suit, Jewry as a separate people would disappear.
  3. Even if they were ready for assimilation, we should reject it, and condemn and punish those of our people who marry Jews even as we should condemn and punish intermarriage of our people with Negroes. Admittedly, the potentialities of the Jews are, on the average, vastly superior to those of Blacks. Nevertheless, both are essentially alien to us. Most gentiles, with their easygoing tolerance, may not recognize this or may wish to ignore it. But Jews recognize it plainly enough. Let any gentile who doubts it spend half an hour looking through You Gentiles by Maurice Samuel, from which, in a note at the end of this chapter, I quote a few passages.[2] And if we are ever to attain that homogeneity and solidarity upon which our greatest cultural potency certainly depends, and even, ultimately, perhaps our survival, we must burn into our consciousness and forever heed that admonition of Goethe’s, “The alien element, we must not tolerate.”
  4. The Jews hate us, and they have long sought and waited for their chance to destroy us. And, as I have plainly enough indicated in these pages, they mean to do it so thoroughly, by racial mixture with Negroes and any and every sort of people who are genetically alien or inferior to us, and by inducing a dysgenic differential birthrate among us, that recovery may forever be impossible. Where does this leave us? Perhaps we can get a clue to the course that wisdom would dictate to us in the advice that Benjamin Franklin is said to have given to the Constitutional Convention in May 1787:

“In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity, have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated, have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion, have built up a state within a state, and have, when opposed, tried to strangle that country to death financially.

If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in their fields to furnish the substance while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics; they will never be otherwise.”[3]

These words have been declared a sheer fabrication, though I have some reason to believe them to be genuine, but for my present purpose it does not greatly matter whether Franklin ever uttered them or not. Let that be as it may, in the light of my knowledge of the Jew and the injury he has inflicted on our people, it is undeniable that an incalculable amount of suffering, humiliation, degeneration, frustration and perversion would have been avoided if the course that these words laid down had been consistently followed from 1787 until this present hour. But at least, beginning now, we can take the words to heart. This, as I see it, would mean:

First. That all Jewish citizenship should be cancelled. Jews should be given protection against physical injury, and a reasonable amount of time should be allowed them to settle their affairs and get out. If the question came up about where they should go, it would doubtless be recalled that many years ago it was urged that some such piece of the Earth as Madagascar should be acquired by international action and by purchase, for Jewish settlement.

Second. Recognizing the suicidal folly of allowing Jews to hold any positions of public trust, responsibility or substantial influence anywhere in our country, they should in the future be admitted to our shores only on temporary visas.


[1] Eric Butler—“The Plotters Behind the World Crisis,” Spearhead, June 1974, p. 13.

[2] Simpson here quotes several passages from You Gentiles by Maurice Samuel, Harcourt, 1924:

[3] The full text of this may be seen in The New York Times for March 9, 1937, under the caption: “Nazis Say Franklin Urged Ban on Jews.” The case for the validity of this speech is more than I can take the space to present here.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Kevin MacDonald https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Kevin MacDonald2024-09-03 07:28:532024-09-03 12:37:25Excerpt from William Gayley Simpson’s, “Which Way Western Man?” (1978)

Mud and Blood: How to Super-Charge First-World Economies with Third-World Fuel

August 31, 2024/11 Comments/in British Politics, Featured Articles/by Tobias Langdon

Mud, sand and sawdust. These simple things make excellent fuels for sophisticated modern engines. All reputable engineers will tell you so. Simply fill your tank and zoom away, enjoying vastly improved performance and mileage. There are just two conditions. First, you have to source the super-fuels in the Third World. It has to be Syrian mud or Moroccan sand or Pakistani sawdust. Second, you have to use the Third-World super-fuels in the First World. Strangely enough, if you try to run an engine on mud in Syria, your engine will stop working. But use the same mud in Germany and your engine will pulsate with power. Trust the experts!

Showered with gold

Well, I’ve just written utter nonsense, of course. No engineer has ever said that mud, sand or sawdust makes good fuel for any kind of engine. Engineers aren’t idiots. They deal in reality, not fantasy. No, the idiotic group that makes nonsensical claims about Third-World fuel isn’t engineers but economists. They’ve been claiming for decades that mass immigration from the Third World is absolutely vital for sophisticated modern economies in the First World. The stale pale frail West will collapse without the dynamism and vitality of youthful Syrians, Moroccans and Pakistanis. Strangely enough, those Third-Worlders don’t make the economies boom in their own homelands. But in the West, they will shower their lucky hosts with gold. Trust the experts!

That’s the message of economists. Their idiocy is matched only by their arrogance. In truth, if you fuel a Western economy with mud, you get blood, not gold. At the end of July 2024, Southport in England saw how readily Third-World mud turns into First-World blood. A Rwandan Black invaded a schoolgirls’ holiday club and began laboring with a large knife. The fruit of his labor was three dead little girls and more seriously injured. At the end of August 2024 Solingen in Germany saw mud and blood too. It was holding a Festival der Vielfalt, a festival of diversity. The highlight of the festival was provided by a Syrian Arab, who shouted “Allahu akbar!” and began laboring with another large knife. The fruit of his labor was uncannily similar: three dead adults and more seriously injured. The expert economists at the Financial Times (FT) reacted to the attack just as you would expect – with arrogance and idiocy. They zoomed in on what they regard as the real problem exposed by the slaughter in Solingen. Not stabby Syrians, but the evil and inbred far-right:

Germany’s real problem: not stabby Syrians, but wicked Whites on the far right (image from the Financial Times)

An expert called Henry Foy, the “FT’s Brussels Bureau Chief,” explained “Why Germany’s stabbing attack has rekindled EU’s far-right fears.” I’ll reproduce his words below. When you read them, note the blithe unconcern revealed by the sub-heading “Knife edge.” It’s a pun referring to the danger of Europe tipping over into xenophobia. Yes, the Financial Times is punning about the bloody and barbarous slaughter and wounding of ordinary German Whites. The paper’s editors and writers simply don’t care. The elite currently ruling with West regard the violent death of ordinary Whites as no problem at all. It’s the reaction to violent death that’s the problem. Here is Henry Foy’s article:

Why Germany’s stabbing attack has rekindled EU’s far-right fears

Today, I unpack what Germany’s response to a stabbing attack this weekend could mean for Europe. …

Knife edge

A fatal knife attack in Germany has convulsed the country’s politics ahead of regional elections this weekend — but is also worrying officials across the EU nervous about the rise of the far right and anti-immigration rhetoric.

Context: A Syrian man stabbed three people to death and injured eight more on Friday night in the west German city of Solingen. The attack has boosted already strong support for the far-right nationalist Alternative for Germany party ahead of elections in the states of Saxony and Thuringia this Sunday.

Yesterday, alongside promising to tighten Germany’s laws on weapons, Chancellor Olaf Scholz pledged to reduce the inflow of irregular migrants and increase deportations. That followed remarks by Björn Höcke, the AfD’s leader in Thuringia, who blamed the attack on what he called: “This multicultural experiment on our country.”

There are two major concerns for Brussels from the Solingen tragedy.

Short-term, it has rammed home the political dangers posed by a resurgent far right across Europe, just weeks after centrist parties celebrated what they saw as European election results that confirmed their dominance of the EU’s political stage.

Longer-term, many in Europe worry that a knee-jerk reaction in Germany — potentially including new border controls and possibly even checks on movement inside of the country — could prompt a rash of similar unilateral moves by other countries where anti-immigration politicians are popular.

That would undermine the core principles of the EU’s Schengen free movement area, and further strain a fundamental aspect of the bloc’s single market.

“We can’t react to this by slamming the door in the faces of people who are often themselves fleeing from Islamists,” said Kevin Kühnert, general secretary of Scholz’s Social Democrats party.

Many in Brussels hope that calmer response prevails. (“Why Germany’s stabbing attack has rekindled EU’s far-right fears,” The Financial Times, 27th August 2024)

Three ordinary Whites have been bloodily slaughtered. Eight more have been wounded. Henry Foy glides past the deaths and woundings with a perfunctory reference to “tragedy.” He simply doesn’t care. When he speaks of “dangers,” he isn’t referring to stabby Syrians but to the “resurgent far right.” He’s also deeply concerned about a “knee-jerk reaction” in Germany that might “prompt a rash” of “unilateral moves” elsewhere in Europe. Note the medical marvel apparent in that mixed metaphor: a “knee-jerk” creates a “rash.” As George Orwell pointed out in his magisterial essay “Politics and the English Language” (1946), mixed metaphors prove that writers are not thinking and not seeing reality. Instead, they’re using what Orwell had earlier called “duckspeak.” It’s not language “in the true sense” but “noise uttered in unconsciousness, like the quacking of a duck.”

Not idiots, but evil

Foy is a duckspeaker, someone who quacks out orthodox opinions without any concern for reality, only for ideology. In his case, it’s the ideology of open borders. That’s why he quotes with approval the duckspeak of another open-border enthusiast: Kevin Kühnert, general secretary of the Social Democrats party. Kühnert said: “We can’t react to this by slamming the door in the faces of people who are often themselves fleeing from Islamists.” He too isn’t concerned about the slaughter and suffering of ordinary German Whites. No, the important thing is keeping the borders open. Kühnert wants Germany to protect people “fleeing from Islamists” by allowing Islamists to accompany those people to Germany. Is he an idiot like Henry Foy and the other experts at the Financial Times? Well, no. In truth Foy, Kühnert and company are evil, not idiots. It’s not their intelligence that’s faulty, it’s their ethics.

Jews’ views

That’s why they demonize the “far right” for not welcoming the slaughter and sex-crimes committed by Third-World invaders. It’s also why they censor their own lies. Recall that the stabby Syrian in Solingen set to work at a “festival of diversity.” That’s ironic, isn’t it? One moment Solingen is celebrating diversity, the next moment diversity is slaughtering Solingeners. Well, the Guardian decided that the irony was too rich for the delicate palates of its readers. As Mark Steyn pointed out: “The original Guardian headline referred to three dead ‘at diversity festival’ …but it was quickly revised to three dead merely at a ‘festival’.”

Mendacious Michael Mann, the Jew who screwed Mark Steyn (images from Wikipedia and Daily Sceptic)

Not that Steyn himself is honest about the disaster of Third-Worlders invading the West. As I’ve often pointed out at the Occidental Observer, he refuses to admit the central role played by Jews in the invasion. So there’s more irony in the legal battle Steyn has fought against Michael E. Mann, a leading advocate of global warming. Steyn has shattered his health and lost huge sums of money trying in vain to defeat his sly and slippery opponent. Guess what? It turns out that the mendacious Michael Mann is a Jew. You can be certain that Mann is just as firmly in favor of open borders as he is opposed to global warming. After all, those are Jews’ views: even as Jews praise the flood of mud, they order Whites to fight the sky.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Tobias Langdon https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Tobias Langdon2024-08-31 07:27:352024-08-31 07:27:35Mud and Blood: How to Super-Charge First-World Economies with Third-World Fuel

Lessons from the English Riots

August 29, 2024/24 Comments/in British Politics, Featured Articles/by Marshall Yeats

“The judge of today needs no such virtues. He is not the agent and exponent of justice, but its mere lackey.”
      L. Mencken 

At time of writing, more than 1,000 people have been arrested in England for participation in riots sparked by the brutal murder of three children by an African. The riots have been described variously as “anti-migrant” or “anti-Muslim,” causing journalists and politicians on the Left to offer weak analyses of the disorder as being the irrational product of online misinformation and Islamophobic prejudice since the Southport murderer was born in the United Kingdom and was not, they insist, from a Muslim background. This is, however, a paradox of the Left’s own making since the riots are best understood as an expression of White working-class exasperation at the increasing pace of demographic change, at the increasing marginalisation and demonisation of the White working class in culture, and of White working-class suffering at the hands of non-White violence more generally. In every meaningful respect, these were race riots with a class subtext. In the English context, Islam and migration, especially in northern England, are merely useful and appropriate bywords for the broader category of racial displacement and for the undeniable sense of a native people under threat. The widespread unrest is a watershed not only because it marked the first major instance of White violence since the 2001 Oldham riots, but also because of how quickly it spread across England, even reaching Northern Ireland. The rapid spread of the riots illustrates that this was not an isolated reaction to an isolated incident, but a guttural nationwide release of anger and frustration that has been building for decades. No less important is the government and police response, ruthless and astonishingly efficient given the suffocating lethargy with which it usually responds to ethnic crime. If anything, the slick response to the riots has all the hallmarks of something long in preparation. Both the riots and the response to them have the feel of a turning point, for better or worse. For those on our side, what lessons can be learned?

Public Shaming and Show Trials

The instinctive, impulsive, reactive nature of the riots gave them an open character not seen in organised Leftist violence with its face coverings and Black Bloc. On the one hand, this was one of the factors leading to their successful and rapid spread. There was a contagious fearlessness to thousands of Whites erupting in rage without shame. Careful preparation for public disorder and civil disobedience, however, was almost non-existent, with the result that the vast majority of rioters were not wearing face coverings or nondescript clothing. Some, including a man wearing a St. George’s flag shirt, wore clothing that actually attracted attention and singled them out for identification. Coupled with a dedicated and fanatically persistent police investigation, which included the use of drones at riot locations, and the fact most of the violence occurred in broad daylight, easy identification thus facilitated a much higher than normal arrest count than would be expected for such chaotic events. While some rioters were arrested at the scene of disorder, a great many more were arrested days later following a process of identification.

One of the more remarkable features of the aftermath of the riots is the way in which police forces across Britain used these arrests for propaganda purposes. Shortly after the riots began to subside, police forces appeared to follow a pre-existing and coordinated playbook by issuing sinister warnings and slick, live-action arrest videos complete with dramatic music. Everywhere the message was the same: “We are coming for you, and your punishment will be severe.” Rotherham’s police chief announced, “If you were there, we are coming for you.” Sussex Police issued a statement saying “We will make you regret your actions.” The head of the Metropolitan police said “We will come after you.”

The most sinister aspect of this intimidation campaign was the universal messaging. This wasn’t a warning to criminals, but to everyone who had attended or even just observed the protests. In other words, the propaganda campaign was directed at every White person who felt moved to take to the streets in outrage. White anger itself was criminalised and stigmatised. Hundreds of mug shots were displayed by regional police forces across multiple social media platforms with gloating, threatening captions, often with the arrested persons street address included. Leftist accounts spammed the comments, gleefully hoping that the arrested persons would face violent retribution from non-White criminals in prison. The BBC offered a searchable “Faces of the Riots” database, containing the photo, name, and other information of almost every convicted rioter, ensuring that they have a stigma, if not a target, attached to them for life.

 

The sentencing of the rioters was also manifestly excessive, especially in light of the fact the British justice system has been notoriously soft on ethnic crime for decades, not least in the category of sex crimes. Without any sense of shame, the authorities bragged of imprisoning a man for almost two years for “shouting at a police dog” while on the other hand releasing rapists and child molestors to make room for White rioters in Britain’s overcrowded prison system. In the perverse value system of the new Britain, a product of Jewish-designed “race relations” laws produced in the 1960s and steadily evolving since then, White anger is the bigger threat and the more dangerous and devastating crime.

Legal Encroachment and Overreach

One development from the riots that has gained most attention is that Britain’s hate speech legislation seems to have entered a new phase of growth and expansion. No new laws have been passed, but the original legislation, especially the 1986 Public Order Act, was sufficiently vague that it has allowed for increasingly draconian interpretation as the culture evolves in a more anti-White direction and allows for stricter enforcement. Jonathan Bowden, speaking in the early 2000s, once said that speech was still relatively free in Britain provided that you didn’t use slurs and provided you didn’t advocate for anything criminal. And at the time he made these comments Bowden was broadly correct. It was perfectly possible to criticise immigration—and even races and racial characteristics—provided it was presented in an intellectual and reasonable manner. Convictions for hate speech were reserved either for movement figureheads such as John Tyndall or Nick Griffin, or else for skinhead groups printing provocative pamphlets.

The growth of social media, however, and its power in the realm of disseminating ideas, has made every White person a potential danger to the prevailing system. The response of the system has therefore been to regard every negative comment made by a White person as a dangerous act of “publishing,” therefore bringing that person under the 1986 Public Order Act which expressly targets anyone who “publishes or distributes written material which is threatening, abusive or insulting” with the intent or likelihood of “stirring up” racial hatred. What exactly constitutes “threatening, abusive, or insulting” words is obviously open to interpretation, and as Western culture has moved in a direction in which ethnic populations are afforded more and more sympathy and special privileges and protections, the interpretation of judges has increasingly moved towards protecting them from all criticism. UK judges and prosecutors are also “trained” in part by the Council of Europe’s “HELP course on Combating Hate Speech,” originally developed in 2015. The course provides all the usual propaganda, stigmatising White self-affirmation as a fundamental danger to minority populations everywhere.

The cumulative result of these developments has been that many of those arrested and publicly shamed in Britain in the wake of the Southport atrocity did nothing more than make comments on social media or, still less, merely repost what someone else had written. One wonders if we are not all that far from being arrested in such a situation simply for “liking” an “illegal” status update. Special task forces were established specifically for the purpose of trawling social media for “illegal” posting. Aggressive police officers were banging on doors across England within days, with some social media posters rapidly receiving prison sentences of more than three years for calling for mass deportations and saying they didn’t want their money going to foreigners who “rape our kids and get priority.” Cheshire Constabulary boasted online of a 55-year-old woman arrested “in connection with an inaccurate social media post,” a move that drew the attention of Elon Musk.

Displaying a staggering degree of ethnic solipsism, Jewish Guardian journalist Jonathan Freedland, who once wrote a novel fantasising about the assassination of a Trump-like President, bleated hysterically that the riots were a re-run of anti-Jewish riots in 1144 following the murder of William of Norwich and demanded that Elon Musk be arrested and brought to trial by English authorities. Freedland worries that Musk’s purchase of Twitter/X has brought about a resurgence in the Right, fretting that “posts including “the word ‘Jew’ had increased fivefold since before the ownership transfer.” God forbid anyone should mention the Jews. Freedland’s solution is that “schools should be teaching information hygiene,” a descriptor equally banal and terrifying since the subtext is clearly a form of brainwashing. Freedland wants “online safety legislation with teeth … if that means toughening up laws so new they are yet to be fully implemented, so be it.” Jews, as always, remain at the forefront of censorship, and even the massive over-reach currently seen under Britain’s speech laws are clearly not enough to satisfy Jewish insecurity and paranoia.

The System Monopoly on ‘Safety and Security’

Another lesson from the riots is that the State will maintain its monopoly on ‘safety and security’ at all costs. Ostensibly the State is guarantor of the safety of its citizens, or at least this is the unstated agreement made in Western European states where citizens do not have gun rights and surrender certain of their capabilities of self-defence to the State in the expectation that the laws and law enforcement offered by the State are capable of substituting self-defense with adequate social protections. These social protections are assumed to be effective, so that police forces can be called upon in emergencies, the justice system will punish crime in an effective and fair manner, and, finally, that the State itself has some kind of notional integrity in the form of controlled borders.

The problem in Western Europe is that the State demands a monopoly on ‘safety and security’ but has utterly failed to fulfil its responsibilities in return. It has taken more and more freedoms, but catastrophically and even proudly neglects the basic safety of those whose freedoms it has taken. Whites everywhere have been robbed and betrayed by this bait and switch. Britons have lost much of their ability for self-defence, and thanks to Jewish-devised race legislation they are actively hindered from defending themselves. In fact, they can’t even speak openly about defending themselves. The British people have to endure compromised borders and constant ethnic violence. As a result, they get to experience a form of second-class citizenship in their own justice system. As events in Southport show, they can’t even send their children to a dance class. Just days after the riots, presented in the media as the pinnacle of moral failings, a White man was stabbed in the neck on camera by an African while a motley of other ethnics joked and laughed. No sooner had the blood been washed from the street than eight stabbings occurred at the Notting Hill Carnival, Britain’s biggest festival of multiculturalism. Neither of these latter incidents were presented as a form of civilizational crisis. Instead they are tacitly assumed to be the necessary cost of living in a “vibrant”, “diverse”, multicultural society. Anyone protesting or speaking negatively about vibrancy and diversity must therefore be a monster, and should be silenced, put in prison, and tarnished for life.

The recent riots were an angry, messy attempt by elements of the British working class to grasp at some semblance of safety and security. And, as has happened so often in multiethnic contexts, this involved an attempt at “cleansing” certain areas occupied by a rival ethnic group or groups. The riots, to the extent that some of the violence was directed against the police, were also a form of retribution by the White working class against authorities which had failed and betrayed them. Leftists made much fun of videos of Britons throwing bins and other objects at police, but these were not just random acts of chaotic violence but the expression of genuine hurt and rage at an overwhelmingly White police force that had betrayed its own kind and turned its back in every meaningful way. White safety isn’t a concern in modern, multicultural Britain, and Whites have no right to protest when their own children are butchered by the imported tools of our hidden elites.

The Class Element and the Incentivization of the Left

Another lesson from the riots is that the White population in Britain is diverging strongly along class lines, with trendy metropolitan middle classes and those largely safe in the suburbs unable and unwilling to empathise with their ethnic kin swamped by migrants in Britain’s larger towns and slums. A common theme in social media commentary on the riots was a sneering condescension displayed by liberal, university-educated types against a class of Whites they view as ignorant, tasteless, boorish, and uncultured. This is summed up in the coining of the word “Gammon,” an even more sneering slur than ‘cracker,’ to describe a typical person from the White working class—gammon referring not only to the pale-pink complexion of those being scorned, but also in the assumption that gammon is a cheap, bland, and fatty meat that a “better” sort of person wouldn’t go for. For this kind of White liberal, “racism” is the resort of beer-swilling Little Englanders who enjoy an artery-clogging diet and whose antipathy to migrants is assumed to be irrational, primitive, piggish, and animalistic. The liberal middle classes have the luxury of thinking of themselves as enlightened, superior moral beings because the foreigners they tend to live and work alongside are at the higher end of the IQ and cultural scale.

In England’s post-industrial north, however, entire towns that once hosted the mining, cotton and linen industries have fallen first into decrepitude and then into mass swamping by millions of Pakistanis and other South Asians. Areas that once thrived with an industrious English working-class culture are now displaced by often predatory Asian communities and their gangs. Whites in these areas are scorned by the immigrant populations, and also by those Whites higher in the socio-economic scale, turning to a life on social welfare benefits, television and a mongrelised pop culture, and the petty amusements of cheap alcohol and football. The White working class is thus a despised caste in Britain, which explains in large part why the mass grooming and rape of girls from this group by Muslims went on for so long without a reaction, and why the stabbing of children from this group of “gammons” was not permitted to be protested, or even for the anger resulting from it to be understood. It has become fashionable to loathe the White working class, even in the midst of its suffering and its grief.

Deportation Discourse

The picture painted thus far is a depressing one indeed. It would seem that only negative lessons, and causes for despair, can be found in the aftermath of the riots. And yet, despite the overwhelming cultural and legal force brought against the riots, I believe there are enough glowing embers in the ashes to give rise to some positivity. The harsh penalties given to the rioters, far out of proportion to the weak justice handed out to ethnic criminals, did not go unnoticed. The hashtag #TwoTierKier quickly went viral, a reference to the fact Britain under Keir Starmer now has a two-tier justice system in which the English are punished far more harshly than those of foreign background. While snuffed out on social media, and forced into more convoluted expressions, there is also a palpable underground discourse which is moving more radically to the Right. Halfway solutions and considerations of moderate approaches are increasingly being abandoned. There is a real sense that “no-one is coming to help us,” and that sense of desperation and abandonment is itself liberating. Just a few days ago, The Telegraph posted an article titled “Britain needs a shock and awe campaign of mass deportations to tackle the illegal migrant crisis,” something that would have been unheard of a year ago. The phrase “mass deportations” taps into a growing discourse in Britain in which limiting immigration is acknowledged as being insufficient to rescue the nation from destruction. Only “mass deportations,” the removal of many millions of people of foreign origin, will restore Britain to a position of relative peace, security, and prosperity.

In a sense, Britain could be described as in a pre-revolutionary state of the kind witnessed in former Soviet countries before the “fall of the wall.” There is a superficial culture in which everyone knows what they should say and think, and there is a nervousness with new acquaintances about how much one can say to the other until one is sure that they aren’t “politically correct.” These social rules remain endemic in the workplace, under the watchful eyes of “human resources” apparatchiks who are incentivised to teach and enforce their “diversity and inclusion” dogmas. But underneath all this is the real Britain—astute, aware, and angry. They can’t imprison everyone, and the Saxon is beginning to hate.

 

 

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Marshall Yeats https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Marshall Yeats2024-08-29 08:43:502024-08-30 05:54:28Lessons from the English Riots

MEDIA: LET’S BLAME THE BORDER CRISIS ON TRUMP!

August 29, 2024/8 Comments/in Featured Articles/by Ann Coulter

The biggest problem Democrats have this year is the mess they’ve made of the border. No matter how many cartwheels the media do for Kamala Harris, immigration remains a top issue for voters — and they blame the Democrats. (I have a theory as to why: Probably because Democrats intentionally flung open the border and let in 10 million illegal immigrants.)

            The media-Democratic Party complex has tried all manner of lies to hide the crime, but those deceptions crumbled on the slightest examination. (Kamala was NOT the “border czar”!) 

Apparently, the lie they decided to stick with is the one about Trump ordering Republicans to oppose AN INCREDIBLY TOUGH BORDER BILL! Why, it’s draconian! The harshest immigration bill this century!   But Trump opposed it only so that he could keep the border as a campaign issue. What a cynical, heartless bastard.

As Harris put it in her acceptance speech:

“Last year, Joe and I brought together Democrats and conservative Republicans to write the strongest border bill in decades. … But Donald Trump believes a border deal would hurt his campaign, so he ordered his allies in Congress to kill the deal. Well, I refuse to play politics with our security. And here is my pledge to you: As president, I will bring back the bipartisan border security bill that he killed, and I will sign it into law.”

In fact, the ”strongest border bill in decades” was nothing of the kind: It was a mandate for open borders. Future presidents wouldn’t have to violate federal law to fling open the border, as the Biden administration has done — they would be required by federal law to fling open the border, as the Biden administration has done. That’s pretty much the only thing the bill did: codify the Biden administration’s disastrous immigration policies.

The left claims this bill is tough because it massively increases the amount of money spent on border patrol — which is how they purchased the BP union’s support for the bill. The agents still wouldn’t be allowed to do their jobs, but they’d get paid more.

Needless to say, every conservative group, publication and member of Congress had trashed the bill before Trump even mentioned it.

On Jan. 3, Speaker Mike Johnson said that if Biden wanted more Ukraine money for national security, “it better begin with defending America’s national security,” meaning a “closed and secured” border.

On Jan. 9, Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky said on Fox News that the border deal was “a sellout. … It’s saying, ‘Oh, we’ll let 5,000 people come illegally a day, and then after that, we might try to stop the next 5,000 that day.’”

Discussing the bill the very same day, Democrat negotiator Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut said the Democrats would refuse to stop Biden from unilaterally releasing millions of illegal immigrants into the country. (Which, by the way, he’s doing in violation of existing federal law.)

In response, the Washington Examiner’s Conn Carroll tweeted: “ok then well that’s ballgame. guess Dems don’t want to end the border crisis after all.”

On Jan. 12, Breitbart published all the gruesome details under the headline: “Senate GOP Border Deal Leaked: Migrants to Get Work Permits, Lawyers, Green Cards.” And, as Sen. Murphy had promised, Democrats had rejected all proposals to secure the border — no fencing, no end to “catch and release,” and no return to Trump’s “Remain in Mexico” program.

Shouldn’t someone tell them that most immigration bills are designed to discourage illegal immigration?

On Jan. 13, Gov. Ron DeSantis said the border bill would be “dead on arrival” if he were in the White House.

On Jan. 15, liberal Democrat (who doesn’t hate his country) Mickey Kaus tweeted: “I mean, what is [Sen. Mitch McConnell] thinking? … He really thought the House would buy this sh*t sandwich? … Has he lost it? … McConnell really should step down.” (In response, McConnell’s chief of staff assured reporters that the senator was “sharp as a tack” and that they could “barely keep up with him.”)

The bill was scorched on Fox News, in The Washington Times, in the House and Senate and all over Twitter. Congressional switchboards lit up like a Christmas tree. Before the bill was even officially released, at least six senators came out against it — Marsha Blackburn (Tennessee), Mike Braun (Indiana), Tim Scott (South Carolina), Josh Hawley (Missouri), Mike Lee (Utah) and Ted Cruz (Texas).

But according to the media’s telling — that is, the lie — this bill was sailing through Congress until Trump bigfooted it. After all, why would it bother any Republican that it required Americans to accept at least 1.8 million illegal aliens every year, would grant asylum to anyone who asked for it, provided even more free benefits to illegals and funneled billions of dollars to the NGOs helping illegals into our country, while doing absolutely nothing to strengthen our border? Forget a wall — this bill did nothing.

That’s the Democrats’ idea of the “strongest border bill in decades.”

Trump’s very first comment on the bill was on Jan. 17 — following two weeks of the conservative media tearing it to shreds. He posted on Truth Social: “I do not think we should do a Border Deal, at all, unless we get EVERYTHING needed to shut down the INVASION of Millions & Millions of people, many from parts unknown, into our once great, but soon to be great again, Country!”

Whereupon Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., claimed Republicans were blocking the bill “on orders from Trump.”

By now, this politically motivated lie has been repeated thousands of times, with the same assurance — and by the same people — as their claims that Trump colluded with Russia, called neo-Nazis “very fine people,” and told Americans to drink bleach.

They know it for a fact, as surely as they knew Hunter Biden’s laptop was “Russian disinformation” and Biden was sharp as a tack.

            COPYRIGHT 2024 ANN COULTER

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Ann Coulter https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Ann Coulter2024-08-29 06:16:362024-08-29 06:16:36MEDIA: LET’S BLAME THE BORDER CRISIS ON TRUMP!

A Russian Soldier’s View of the Ukraine War. Horrifying.

August 26, 2024/26 Comments/in Featured Articles/by Rolo Slavski

I asked Dr. Livsci to provide us with a translation and a summary of the book “Storm Z” and the good doctor went ahead and delivered. Screen Shot 2024-08-24 at 7.19.54 AM.png

Before this, he covered, “Why the SMO?” which was a very in-depth analysis of why the SMO had failed and why the subsequent Not-War that followed was designed to fail as well. Take some time to read that series as well. It has always been the goal of my blog to provide dissident patriotic perspectives coming out from within Russia to patriots in the West. Most western Putin fans who believe in the Kremlin’s great moral humanitarian superstate and it’s 5D hyperdimensional chess war against the Satanic-Soros-Analic-Nazis of the West will be shocked to hear firsthand accounts of what this war really is after years of consuming propaganda slop churned out by the collective “ZAnon”. These big-name bloggers, almost all of them with spook backgrounds themselves, have crafted a kind of political-religious narrative around the savior Putin and sometimes also the governments of other BRICS countries. But this narrative is all nonsense that cannot stand up to any real scrutiny. I firmly believe that if people were to learn just how similar our respective occupation governments were, we’d be less inclined to keep massacring each other over nonsense. – RS**

This here, fellow Stalkers, is my translation of two chapters of Daniel Tulenkov’s now-infamous book “Storm Z”. It received a strong recommendation from the late doomer-blogger Murz. The so-called Z-Stormers are the Moscow MoD’s hastily thrown together zek (penal colony) punitive shock troop battalions. These prisoners had fairly low to practically zero chances of surviving the SMO unscathed given the conditions that they were forced to fight in.

Our main character and author, Daniel, was imprisoned for some kind of financial tom-foolery, the details of which he doesn’t elaborate on in the book save for claiming that the sentence he received was unjust. Take it for what it is worth. About a year into his term though, he had signed up for the Storm Z program to expunge his conviction and to get a chance to start over in society. He shares lots of anecdotal stories that are revealing about who exactly is sent to the front and how it all unfolds there.

This is the basic structure of the book.

But a few more observations first.

Right off the bat, we meet many contract soldiers well over 50 years-of-age. One gets the impression that this war is being fought for and by pensioners, at least on the Russian side, which would certainly explain the over-reliance on Soviet propaganda in the form of imagery and narratives. One of these old-timers makes his last stand and goes down fighting against the UAF soldiers that storm his position. We cover his story in the chapters that I’ve done my best to translate for you below.

Another contract soldier Daniel greatly respects, who isn’t in these chapters, is pushing 60 and ended up signing a contact with MoD because he was drunkenly fleeing from the police and in the spur of the moment, he ran straight into the recruitment office. According to Daniel, this man won’t last in civilian life long once the war is over, but for now he is right where he was always meant to be and has saved many lives.

Daniel himself is over 40 during the events that he is describing and I get the impression that the zeks being used as suicidal storm troops are actually slightly younger than the contraktniki guys on average.

The author of Z-Storm

One not so surprising detail that Daniel mentions regarding his deceased comrades is that the churkas [non-Whites from Central Asia] who work at headquarters at cushy desk jobs on the Russian taxpayer dime would steal the belongings and money of men recently killed at the front once they heard the news. Putin’s New Rossiyans always go above and beyond the call of duty to demonstrate their love for their adopted country as any Russian will be keen to tell you … once they’re sure that you’re not a fed that is.

Another interesting observation that he makes is that the MoD has a specific category of zek troops that they don’t want coming home alive under any circumstances. He doesn’t elaborate on who is put in this category, but we can infer that incarcerated Russian Nationalists are the most obvious group being implied. Daniel is not one of these nationalists himself, but he seems to have a basic sense of patriotism to his character. Said another way, Daniel is a basically a normie from the lower spectrum of Russian society.

Daniel also has a kind of eclectic writing style where he jumps around in his narrative from the present to the recent past constantly. Since I’m giving you two chapters in isolation, this can be very confusing, so I’ve added some clarifying text in-between segments. I picked these two chapters specifically because they are a great example of the absolutely brutal, chaotic slaughter fest that this war is. You will find no evidence of any brilliant planning, no “conserving lives” or anything of the sort on the Russian end either. It’s just pure merciless and relentless culling. And let nobody say “well sure it’s the Z-Stormers,” as the old vet and his men that are killed early on in the narrative are contract troops, not zeks.

On the Ukrainian side, needless to say, it’s largely the same kind of cruelty on display as far as it concerns the cynical attitude of the higher-ups towards the lives of their own men. I hope some of you find this firsthand account of the war to be as revealing as I did as far as getting a visceral, unpropagandized look at what is really happening at the front.

We start with Daniel’s account of surviving a Ukrainian assault on some village south of Rabotino during Ukraine’s big counter offensive last summer. He doesn’t name the village for opsec reasons but the way he abbreviates it, it’s pretty obvious he is talking about Novoprokopovka (N-ka), which is the next little town south of Rabotino.

A few times in the story, Daniel mentions “the eye” and this is a reference to the “Eye of Zelensky” which is the high ground around Rabotino where some especially bloody and fruitless fighting had been going on for a while. With all that information in mind, off we jump into the narrative of the fighting!

***

“Boy” was the very first to die. No matter how scared we are for ourselves, first of all his quick death shocked us. The whole house was shrouded in dust from the crumbling wall, snaking into the long room where I was located like demonic smoke. I had just woke up into a literal fiery hell. Guns firing everywhere, explosions in the yard, dust, something’s burning somewhere, someone’s yelling something somewhere. And like always no matter how many or few of us there is, someone is required to verbalize the obvious: “we’re all fucked”.

Let’s see. Maybe yes. Maybe no.

I throw on my armor and helmet. From the yard and through the broken window something comes flying painfully and burning into my hip. No blood though and my pants are whole, apparently just a shrapnel burn. I recognise the characteristic impacts on the wall of the house, well whats left of it. “Bradley” just like I said.

In life we have all had a situation where we can rightfully say “I told you so”. But hand to God, they usually seem justified only after the fact. But not in my case right here and right now. I was just a little off with the timing. I said they would come at 5 and they came at 3:30. The Bradley cockily flies up and offloads the assault team and their support advances at us from the tree line.

Here Daniel breaks from the narrative and takes us back two days.

The Boy and us stood on the “Eye of Zelensky” burning the hohols out the day before yesterday. We hit them with 2 barrels of artillery and shot up the hedgerows where they would gather up at different spots. Our team leader comes running up yelling, “where are you shooting theres nobody there”!

Well of course now there is nobody there anymore.

The next day it all repeats the same way. They own the tree line and come and go along it as they please. Crawling around in their dugouts past my dead comrades, those two who had been in the rear. They dumped their bodies on the road and now they lay there, maybe face down or maybe face to the sky.

Daniel is referring here to a previous incident described in the book where a stupid commander got two of his comrades killed when he mistook Ukrainians for Russians and opened fire on his own men.

Here they pass by on that road on which we ran away to the South.

In front of the sign “N-ka”, they are dispersing and spreading. They are always near us. They hold everything under control therefore we are exposed in the Eye not only in the homes at the edge of the town, but right here under the entrance sign.

We are exposed at night and during the day; cassets and drones are pissing on our heads.

There isn’t anywhere to hide, people literally hide under bushes.

In the evening before it was fully dark I observed an appalling scene through a hole in the fence. A kamikaze drone marked one of our guys crawling under a tree. He desperately shot from a half prone position at the rotating drone which picked its trajectory and attacked with an ear cutting screech. Bright flash, explosion, but the impact was somewhere in the tree branches.

Maybe our man lived.

Now Daniel picks up another story thread from the evening right before the attack he began the chapter with.

All night something we don’t understand what is going on. We haven’t got any information or clear understanding of the overall picture. Our artillery is working on the field to our right. What or who is there, we simply don’t know. One of the explosions throws a person up in the air about 3 stories, tumbling and flapping his arms like wings.

Who’s that? We don’t know.

How did someone end up in that field? What if it’s our 2nd group from the second BTR? They broke into the Ukrainian fortifications and sat there for a day. Then when no one came to support them, maybe they started crawling back through the hohols lines through that field and now our artillery is assuming they are hohols.

It could be anything.

Daniel is again referring back to a previous attack on the Ukrainians of which he never describes the outcome in the book, presumably because it wouldn’t get published with the details left intact. However his wondering here about whether their own artillery is hitting the second team of survivors trying to crawl back to their own lines through the Ukrainians reveals enough for us to know that their previous attacks did not go well.

When darkness fully falls things calm down, but from the tree line controlled by the UAF, someone is crying out in clean Russian for help.

Like wolves on the loose at the edges of the village hunting for a bitch in heat. The lust-crazed males rush to where only robbers are waiting. That’s how the hohols lure us in with clean Ryazan (a town in Russia) speech. But it doesn’t trick me at all. I know what’s there by the sign — only death. That is, death for my new comrades who lie there now, but not for me. I came back from there, ran from there actually. Whats ours over there is probably a burned and knocked out BTR and the Lord of Hades consuming two of my friends before that sign.

Over there is the enemy. Over there is death.

And from there, at around midnight, rounds from a tank come flying in at us. A shot and an instant impact. You can recognize tank shots by their speed and the feeling of power with which they tear up the earth. Now they are plowing the outskirts of the village. Very thoroughly. Rounds are plowing directly next to our house. Through every gap, dust billows and dirt flys in through the windows. I just manage to flop down at my observation point, cuddling up to it and pray to make it through this barrage because our house wont withstand a direct hit.

With me in the room are two Dagestanis and Boy.

The Dagestanis piss on the tank and basically get their piss everywhere. They sleep cuddled up to their rifles.

I took pity on Boy and sent him off to sleep too, leaving me on watch alone.

The tank is reloading so i’ll have a brief brake to unwind a little. I smoke and look at my watch. 2 AM. I need to stay on watch until 4, but my internal voice is saying I have to switch out at 3. I have no rationale explanation, I just know I have to do it. Unexpectedly the room becomes bright, I lift my head and look outside. Somewhere far off greenish fireworks are going off in the middle of the sky and slowly floating to the ground. I guess it must be phosphor, its the first time I’ve seen anything like it and it’s impressive. I wouldn’t want to be located where those greenish lights meet the earth.

Pretty soon it’s going to be lively here.

I know for certain with all my humble familiarity with the tactics of the VSU that all the activities of the past two days weren’t for nothing. In the morning at dawn they will attack with Bradley support. Right here, at the entrance to the village stands our incinerated BMP. Right here they’ll role in and smash our whole house into rubble and deploy their assault team.

And the dead who lie there in the dark before our eyes loom closer.

At the Eye, ten people are posted along both sides of the road. Their fate is unenviable. They will end up in the fiercest mess — under fire from two sides. It’s unlikely anyone will make it out of there.

I’ve already shared my thoughts with the team leader that evening. He waves his hands as if to ward off my nagging. Between the lines I read “you worry about yourself quite a bit but you’re in the Storm now, you’re supposed to be fucked”.

Nevertheless I do everything how I feel compelled to. At 3, I wake up the team leader and say that I’m exhausted and that I really need to sleep a little. He, with understanding, agrees. After all, he himself said that the tired will be changed out. He offers me a spot in the same room but I decline and go back to the room I slept in before. I need to sleep an hour or two before the guests arrive but only manage to sleep a half hour that night.

Here Daniel fast-forwards 30 minutes to when the Bradley shows up interrupting his nap.

We held off the hohols’ initial rush.

From the South our armor is approaching, a tank with a BMP behind.

I can barely hear the clattering of the Bradley’s treads as it takes off and speeds away back in the direction of Rabotino. The infantry break up into groups, half crawling in the dark toward the houses to the left and right of us. But not to ours. The Bradley worked on our house, demolishing the outside fence but the infantry don’t come in here.

Before that, from midnight to two, their tank ploughed up everything around our house but made no direct hit. Apparently, the hohols had marked our position as occupied and ready for defense so they were planning on taking the rest of the houses from the flanks or rear. And that’s how it played out. They managed to take a few neighboring houses, but they chased themselves into a trap. It all ended with them being blocked and cleared out of the houses they occupied or simply being blown away with artillery along with the homes. The prisoners we took cleared up the strange strategy, explaining that they were told nobody was even here. That is, by their calculations, our house was the only one occupied on the edge of the village and the rest were empty, with our main strength further on in the town. Thus we had given up the outskirts without a serious fight. But it wasn’t to be and the attack met a very hot reception.

We sit at openings in the walls covering all four directions now.

I observe the yard ready to shoot whatever slithers in the darkness. In the street behind us, our tank manuvers and the BMP comes flying directly to our house at a wild speed. If one views vehicles like animals, it would be like an angry bear rushing from its lair as a jackal skedaddles away from him with its tail tucked between its legs.

On the move, our BMP opens fire on the retreating Bradley, the bang of her cannon is like beautiful music to our ears. The rev of her motor, the clattering of her treads, the bright flashes of her muzzle, the power of our native armor reinvigorates our spirits and snuffs out our fear.

When sitting in a house of shit and branches (and everything in Ukraine is shit, the people, the culture, the history and, of course, the houses) and 30 meters away an American Bradley is snarling, one begins to feel acute discomfort. I could of course try and slither out of the house and take a shot at it with the Satan’s Tube [anti-tank rocket] but I don’t have the courage for that right now. And it turns out that besides me nobody even knows how to shoot the Satan’s Tube.

And here you sit with a rifle in a carton house and behind the ruined fence is a clattering, snarling, scary iron beast. So of course when it vanishes at the mad approach of our BMP firing while on the move our spirits are lifted straight into the stars. But the BMP can’t be detained here for long. It is a bomb magnet and it’s soon making its way back into the interior of the town. Meanwhile we continue sitting at our positions observing everything going on but not giving away our position. All around us a wild firefight is going down but we haven’t fired a single shot. We’ll only shoot if they come at us directly, but so far they aren’t coming.

The battle dissipates to a couple of crossfires.

There’s heavy fire from our neighbor’s house where the old man is located. The old man is a contract soldier between 50-55 years old and a heavy drinker so he looks even older.

There’s shooting along the whole road and apparently part of the assault is moving in the field beyond the yard. We’re trying to figure out whats happening and where but we don’t have a clear picture. There’s no clear picture because while tripping in a cloud of dust in a ruined house, our team leader lost our walkie talkie when he carried out the dead body of Boy. We look for some trace of it in the dark but no luck just yet. Therefore, we sit like blind kittens in the half-ruined crumbling house and can only guess if ours are finishing off the hohols or if the hohols are finishing off ours or even worse, if ours are shooting at each other.

Meanwhile our house is occasionally fired upon but by whom isn’t clear.

We don’t fire back and wait on the sunrise. We need to find the damn walkie talkie because the situation is becoming seriously dangerous. The neighbor’s house is obviously being shot up by friendlies meaning that command thinks it’s been taken by the enemy already when it’s actually still holding out against the hohols. If this continues then we are next to be shot at.

We really need that walkie talkie.

It’s just becoming light when an RPG round comes flying at our house. Half of the back wall crumples into dust and now, not only is our front open to the enemy but the rear as well. The RPG was from our own side. Apparently, command thinks the hohols have taken our position as well. Me and the two Dagestanis run into the ruined room and crawling on all fours to avoid being seen from outside try and dig out the cursed walkie talkie. Found it! We call command and ask them to stop shooting at us.

Squawks from the walkie talkie:

“What? It’s you there? Fuck, fuck you in the mouth, why the fuck were you keeping silent before, you were about to be in a fucking little box!”.

Box here has a duel meaning as it references the remains of Daniel’s team fitting in a shoe box, but also the artillery was about to start working on the box of grid coordinates where the house was located.

The box was really zeroing in along the neighboring road and aiming for the Old Mans house. “Who do you have to your left?” asks the voice from the walkie talkie.

—”Old Man’s there”.

— “Looks like hohols to us!”.

— “No, it’s ours, it’s the Old Man”.

—”No, it can’t be ours, the box is going to deal with that house, be careful over there!”.

The team leader yells back at them, begging for time, trying to convince command that the house is ours. The walkie talkie is silent. Then from the walkie talkie “we’re sending a drone up now, you’ve got 5 minutes to exit the house and wave your hand. If nobody exits we are fucking the house up”.

We try and scream to the Old Man, he hears us but doesn’t understand what we are saying.

One of ours yells back, “yeah it’s me, you hear me?”. They again yell his nickname with rasping voices. We yell one after another. Gotta get someone to exit the house and wave their hand to the drone. The Old Man yells back the nicknames of our team, saying he doesn’t understand. Unexpectedly the volume of small arms fire concentrated on the Old Man’s position thickens. There’s an intense fire fight in progress. From my position I see our drone flying towards us from the middle of the village. Again the walkie talkie:

— “Well who’s there blyat, wheres your Old Man, he coming out”?

—”Theres a fight there”.

— “We know, we see it, but since he isn’t coming out, the hohols are beating him down. Now they are definitely going for the house”.

Yeah, now the hohols were definitely in the house. The hohols were storming the position and now the Old Man was no more. And in a minute, the hohols would be no more, along with the whole house. There wouldn’t be anyone or anything left there because the box was opening fire right on the spot. The box buried everything, turning the house into a trash dump for broken construction material. The walkie talkie hisses:

— “Get ready for extraction, how many of you are there”?

—”Copy”

—”Relocate along the road to House D, three minutes to extraction”.

Ours were pulling back from the edge of the town, that meant tanks and artillery would level everything left behind and then we would re-clear the area. As we left, I looked back, there at the entrance lay Boy’s body. Now he died a second time in this burning and crumbling house. His body would always remain in this ruin. He wouldn’t even go home in a zinc coffin.

A fucked up situation, but we have to run to House D.

The house we need to go around to is next door. We can see it from the entrance. A short sprint and we are in place. But this small distance turns into a difficult and maddening piece of real estate because right on the approach to the house we start taking fire from a two-story building on the other side of the road. Someone falls and someone like me speeds up to cover the distance to the door. We will never work out who shot us but it was probably our own side. Some of us run all the way to the house and throw ourselves inside.

I don’t, I run to the closest brick outhouse and hide there.

The shooting dies down. From a window in the house an unfamiliar guy with a rifle appears. It’s understood that we are friendlies, but all the same we don’t know each other and I’m on someone else’s position. I say where I came from and give my nickname. He asks the guys I came with who made it to the house to confirm my story. Everything checks out but the hohols start working on us with indirect fire. Cassets don’t scare me, but before that they usually drop mines. The first lands far from me but it’s a matter of time before one lands somewhere not so far.

I yell to the house for them to let me in.

The door opens and in three bounds I end up inside. Lots of people are in here, lots of wounded laying and sitting on the floor. From my group, everyone is wounded except me. Everyone is waiting on evacuation. Accordingly, I plan on evacuating with them. My epic in N-ke is coming to an end and its time for me to get out of here and return to my own people. It’s not like this is a simple task in itself, a convincing concise explanation of where I’ve been, what I’ve been doing the past 3 days cut off from my group and why didn’t I leave N-ke earlier needs to be thought up.

Daniel ended up in this battle due to being cut off from his usual team 3 days earlier, an event described at the very beginning of the book. Another Z-Stormer team arrives at the house at the edge of N-ka where Daniel took cover and he stays with them due to the likelihood of being maimed or killed trying to find his way back alone. But everyone in this team he fought with is now dead or wounded, so nobody can confirm his story upon evacuation.

I counted on the local commander confirming that I didn’t desert off into the treeline somewhere and that I was directly on the front the whole time. That I couldn’t leave the town earlier because of heavy fighting which I took direct part in. But here and now it wasn’t clear how this could all be arranged. Whatever. Deal with it later. It’s time to actually get out of here for real first.

The evacuation point is a kilometer south from the town main street and covering that kilometer is no trivial matter.

As soon as the hohols understood that their assault has failed, they start pounding the village with everything they have on hand. The fate of their own troops sitting in the local houses doesn’t worry them in the slightest. They are expendable resources and already written off. This cynical calculation of the Ukrainian command is entirely understandable. Their men are already dead, they were on a one-way trip here. Evacuating them is entirely impossible. It’s only a short matter of time until we re-clear the outskirts and why would the Ukrainian command waste that time? The Ukrainians don’t waste that time.

This is an especially revealing passage about the nature of the fighting in Ukraine. If the attacking side does not dig in in a timely manner, they are dead men. In this battle, the Ukrainians were dispersed and took prohibitive losses on the assault and were accordingly vulnerable to the Russian’s counterattack which would reach them much faster than any support from their own side could. Essentially, a failed attack equals death, because there is no organized retreat in good order possible for the attacker. Now imagine that, very often, especially after the Ukrainians’ failed counter offensive which this book is covering, it has been the Russian side making these absolutely suicidal attacks over and over and over again on heavily defended positions.

Also, remember that the Russian command had no qualms about dropping artillery on the Old Man’s position when it looked like he was surrounded. The cynical attitude Daniel is describing makes sense and it applies to both sides. This is what attrition warfare really looks like — taking as many of the enemy out with you as possible. The Ukrainians started pounding the village outskirts without wasting time because the Russians were still there and there’s no point in giving the enemy an easy time to evacuate their wounded.

Your own men are as good as dead anyway, so why hold back?

The northern outskirts of N-ka are covered by fire from two sides. The house where we are located is covered by our side since the remnants of the enemy’s assault team could try and take cover here and a second line which also includes our house is also covered by the hohols.

Not to insult anyone’s intelligence here, but clarity is king, so let me explain that he means that both sides are firing close to the house. The Russians want to prevent the remnants of the Ukrainian assault team from digging in anywhere and the Ukrainians want to complicate the Russian evacuation by fouling it up so that they either get shelled by their own side or the shelling is called off.

Prisoners we already have, and command doesn’t need any more of them, so orders on that account are very clear. Zero them out [kill all the Ukrainian prisoners].

Sitting on a box against the wall, I listen intently to radio chatter between Azart, the overall Russian commander in N-ke, and our group moving to re-clear the Northern outskirts. It suddenly comes to mind that this is the first time I’ve ever observed the hohols being butchered like this. Usually, it’s always us running away from somewhere, losing comrades and vehicles, failing our tasks. Well, two can play at this game it seems. A prisoner reported that they were all of 18 of them on the assault. How many were in the support group in the tree line he doesn’t know. But this doesn’t interest anyone. They were beaten back already in the morning and most are buried in the Old Man’s house. Now, what is interesting is the 17 who made it into the village and who are dispersed among a few houses.

The whole event now becomes a sort of safari.

The hohols are now divided, blocked and destroyed by Azart’s fire. There is no trace of the kind and hospitable Russian spirit here. The hohols are hounded absolutely without mercy like dangerous animals accompanied by our very un-hypocritical comments. They resist sluggishly without any desperate fatalism. The clever hohol brain doesn’t lose hope in finding a windowpane from which to jump out of and crawl away.

In the most desperate situation he will surrender. Because Russians are kind. They will take you somewhere warm, feed you and give you cigarettes. Sympathize, listen to some sugary verbal vomit and send you somewhere safe in the rear. Then they will exchange you full and healthy for one of our half corpses with crushed testicles and smashed faces [he is referring to the capture and torture on video of hundreds of unprepared Russian soldiers in the early weeks of the SMO]. The clever hohol reasons like this. But today isn’t his day. Not one managed to slither away from N-ka. All the carcasses were tagged by the evening.

Meanwhile we needed to move to the evacuation point.

That someone was pissing on the hohols somewhere on the outskirts is one thing but the heavy fire on our position was another level of problem. A mine landed right in front of the door and shrapnel punches right through the Chinese plastic door and lands a few centimeters from my face, opening up the bicep muscles of the senior enlisted soldier in the house in two places.

Thankfully the bone is untouched. The seniors wound added urgency to the evacuation. Someone applies a tourniquet and injects him with morphine. Three more wounded are selected and sent with the first group. They had just left the house when they came flying back inside. From the two-story building we are again taking fire. We needed to clear up who is shooting at us and why.

With curses and threats into the radio, the situation is resolved. And once more repeated with the evacuation team flying back inside the door.

—”What the fuck! You assholes are fucking shooting us again!”.

—”We aren’t doing shit!” .

— “Who the fuck is shooting?”.

— “Who the fuck knows.”.

It ended up being a group of hohols who had settled on the second floor when the guys we were cursing were on the first floor. For that whole time, nobody even suspected the existence of this group of hohols even though they weren’t even hiding and shot at everything that entered their field of view. Fire which after the morning circus everyone wrote off as coming from friendlies with curses and responded by yelling like idiots at them instead of suppressing it.

Of course accounting for the hohols and destroying them was a matter of time and this group eventually was found and cleared.

We could have just sprinted to the evacuation point under hohol artillery fire but the chaos from the hohols who had made it into the village stubbornly refused to abate. Panting and pale, the troops who play the role of runners from headquarters come gasping up. “Listen guys, behind the wall there.. along the second half of the house there have been two hohols sitting there since the morning the prisoners say”.

Well we are walking around scrambling from the fire from the two-story building and, apparently, the bastards are sitting right next door and could have laid us out at anytime, for example when we ran from house to house. Alright, we send two riflemen and a machine-gunner to sort things out. The rest of us perch by the windows in case the hohols make a dash for the back yard. The guys move out where the squatters are supposed to be and wild shooting pops off. The guys come back.

There was nobody there.

— “Where were you shooting”?

—”We shot up the room in case they were there”.

Ahhh, it all becomes clear. They were hunting for ghosts.

Well at least its all clear that there are no lurking reptiles right under our noses. Now we can finally go. And it would have been all fine, but then a tank starts working on the neighboring house. Not a mortar or artillery, but a tank. A tank is serious, a tank is nerve-wracking. Find a corner sit down and pray while listening to tiles fly off the roof from the approaching explosions. Mixed in with the tank are cassettes. That’s also a classic tactic of the VSU. Suppress the enemies psyche with the tank (and a tank will seriously suppress the psyche, much more efficiently than mortars or artillery) drive him from cover and mow him down with cassettes. And cassettes were ripping up our whole perimeter as well as the neighboring house. I could hear the platoon commander from the neighboring house speaking to Azart on the radio asking for artillery help.

— “There’s apparently a tank working on us, distance one and half to two kilometers, smother it!”.

That is, do something, anything. We couldn’t really take any measures, we hadn’t seen or heard a single exit to the south but meanwhile the tank is energetically and determinedly leveling our house. The neighbor’s house is already missing the roof and ours it seems is about to buckle. In the sky, we have enemy strike drones and mines raining down and if a hole should appear in the roof …

This was a bit hard for me to translate goodly, the salient point that is lost here due to my limited translation abilities is that the tank is apparently shooting from the south which is well within the Russian controlled part of town and nobody saw or heard of a Ukrainian tank breaking in that far. But there are Russian tanks in that part of town.

Azart rasps and hisses through the radio “listen, what kind of vehicles do you have with you over there?”.

Yeah, right in the middle of all this noise and racket let’s figure out what kind of caterpillars are clanking somewhere over by the neighbor’s house, sounds good. From the radio come a nervous, “fuck, where did it come from, north or south?”.

North is Rabotino and the Ukrainian side. The South is ours.

The tank tracks sound closer but it’s still not possible to determine from which direction. We have nothing besides small arms on us. We tossed away all our Satan’s Tubes when we left our house on the outskirts. We didn’t take anything with us. Some kind of tracked vehicle is now rumbling next to the house and Azart is hysterical:

— “where the fuck did it come from, north or south?”.

He calls up the artillery crew: — “Destroy it!”.

I can’t even convey properly my shock at those words. Damn it, you’re the commander! You have comms with headquarters. What are you saying? You don’t know what kind of vehicles are rolling around your own town in broad daylight? And if you don’t know, how can you categorically demand their destruction? I kind of doubt some hohols jumped into a Bradley and drove here from Rabotino in broad daylight. In the morning while it’s dark sure but not at 2 in the afternoon.

Then from the radio sounds the code for an air alert.

Thats a huge rarity, the first time I’ve ever heard it actually. They aren’t supposed to have many helicopters here. Happily the helicopter didn’t show up, maybe it flew off somewhere else. But the tank starts working again. The neighbour’s house can no longer cover their hysteria. “Destroy! That! Beast!”. The beast throws rounds closer and closer. With sadness I think of what a pity it is to live through such a morning just to croak under this ruined house.

I’m in the kitchen now where the only free corner is to be found.

Now I unsuccessfully try to find something to eat. On the other hand I find a nice hat. I have no hat at all and here’s one that is like new. “Whose hat?” I ask the guys around me and they all shrug their shoulders disinterestedly. Everyone is exhausted waiting for the damn tank to level the house. And it will level the house eventually. It seems like they have seriously decided to finish us off. Maybe revenge for the guys they lost in the morning. Or maybe they spotted our prisoners (who are in the neighbor’s house) and want to finish them so they won’t say anything.

But what can they say?

It’s classic mental retardation. I already saw the interrogation filmed on a cell phone. The Ragul [derogatory term for Ukrainian hicks or bumpkins] mumble something, moan something, pretend they don’t understand Russian. In the end they remember after some physical impacts but mumble and groan and cover their noses until the cajoling stops.

From above orders have already arrived to not zero these prisoners out and instead carry them back to the rear. In order to get them to the rear we need to move some of our wounded and arrange a convoy. Someone offers to zero out the prisoners and claim they just died in an accident. Some headquarters mole shoots down the idea, the FSB has personally instructed him to deliver the mumbling Ragul to the rear. So the hohols are spectacularly lucky, our Chekha will never zero them out, that’s for damn sure. [Soldiers believe that the FSB secretly works with the UAF in various ways].

Well, let them live, I guess.

That is, if their brothers in the Leopard don’t bury them with along with us in this house. And to not end up buried, we need to exfil somehow. We try to come up with a plan on how to exfil under this much fire when someone remembers a metal drainage tube covered in asphalt under the main road. We start sprinting there in small groups while the tank is reloading.

Amongst the wounded, we have a blind guy. Moving him requires a lot of fuss and time and we don’t especially have a surplus of time. Cassettes continue raining and drones keep flying and soon the tank will join in shooting with them. We barely finish exfiltration with all the blind twisting and squirming when the tank starts firing. Over there they have already been informed we have moved and the tank starts clearly beating on our culvert. The tube buzzes, bangs and jumps but nothing can touch us here. Not the tank, not the kamikaze drones, not the cassettes. Nervous tension drains from my body and I realize how exhausted I am.

I decide to try to take a nap.

We leave Daniel and his men here, hiding out in a drainage pipe, taking cover from the drones and the tank shelling as they’re desperate to get out of an area that is going to be flattened soon with or without them in it.

*   *   *

Sci-fi fans will no doubt notice parallels between the zek battalions and the Death Korps of Krieg. Many Russian-speakers on the Runet already have, leading to the meme that the unfortunate denizens of the Slavlands are already living in the grimdark Warhammer 40K setting.

Stay tuned for Part II.

https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png 0 0 Rolo Slavski https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/TOO-Full-Logo-660x156-1.png Rolo Slavski2024-08-26 02:11:032024-08-26 02:45:20A Russian Soldier’s View of the Ukraine War. Horrifying.
Page 89 of 506«‹8788899091›»
Subscribeto RSS Feed

Kevin MacDonald on Mark Collett’s show reviewing Culture of Critique

James Edwards at the Counter-Currents Conference, Atlanta, 2022

Watch TOO Video Picks

video archives

DONATE

DONATE TO TOO

Follow us on Facebook

Keep Up To Date By Email

Subscribe to get our latest posts in your inbox twice a week.

Name

Email


Topics

Authors

Monthly Archives

RECENT TRANSLATIONS

All | Czech | Finnish | French | German | Greek | Italian | Polish | Portuguese | Russian | Spanish | Swedish

Blogroll

  • American Free Press
  • American Freedom Party
  • American Mercury
  • American Renaissance
  • Arktos Publishing
  • Candour Magazine
  • Center for Immigration Studies
  • Chronicles Magazine
  • Council of European Canadians
  • Counter-Currents
  • Curiales—Dutch nationalist-conservative website
  • Denmark's Freedom Council
  • Diversity Chronicle
  • Folktrove: Digital Library of the Third Way
  • Human Biodiversity Bibliography
  • Institute for Historical Review
  • Mondoweiss
  • Pat Buchanan
  • Paul Craig Roberts
  • Project Nova Europea
  • Red Ice
  • Richard Lynn
  • Rivers of Blood
  • Sobran's
  • The Occidental Quarterly Online
  • The Political Cesspool
  • The Raven's Call: A Reactionary Perspective
  • The Right Stuff
  • The Unz Review
  • VDare
  • XYZ: Australian Nationalist Site
NEW: Individualism and the Western Liberal Tradition

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Culture of Critique

Also available at Barnes & Noble

Separation and Its Discontents
A People That Shall Dwell Alone
© 2025 The Occidental Observer - powered by Enfold WordPress Theme
  • X
  • Dribbble
Scroll to top

By continuing to browse the site, you are legally agreeing to our use of cookies and general site statistics plugins.

CloseLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only