Jenji Kohan och den judiska hypersexualiseringen av västerländsk kultur

/in /by

Original Article: Jenji Kohan and the Jewish Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture

Sexualisering Som det utförligt redogörs för Kritikkulturen, ansåg Freud och hans anhängare att antisemitism var en universell sjukdom som bottnade i undertryckt sexualitet. Den teoretiska grunden för detta finner man i Freuds Tre essäer om sexualiteten där han kopplade aggression till frustreringen av mänskliga drifter – i synnerhet sexdriften. Kevin MacDonald påpekar att: ”Fastän Freud själv senare utvecklade idén om dödsdriften som förklaring till aggression, har ett återkommande tema i den freudianska kritiken av västerländsk kultur, vilket bl.a. Norman O. Brown, Herbert Marcuse, och Wilhelm Reich exemplifierar, varit att frigörelsen av undertryckt sexualitet skulle leda till minskad aggression och bana väg för en era av universell kärlek.”

Utifrån denna uppfattning anses antisemitism vara en form av aggression, en följd av förnekad sexualitet, och psykoanalysens judiska uppdrag var att göra slut på antisemitismen genom att befria mänskligheten från sina sexuella bortträngningar. Individer som var upptagna av sex ansågs mindre benägna att bry sig om vad judar sysslade med, än mindre att motarbeta dem politiskt. Folk som ägnar större delen av sin tid åt jakt efter sexuell stimulering kommer sannolikt inte anordna pogromer eller hota det rika och mäktiga judiska etablissemanget. I sin, jewishquarterly.org /issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38 [now a hijacked site] ofta citerade essä, från Jewish Quarterly skriver Nathan Abrams att:

Judar i USA har varit sexuella revolutionärer. En stor andel av det som skrevs om sexuell frigörelse författades av judar. De som gick i bräschen för rörelsen som tvingade USA att anta en mer liberal syn på sex var judiska. Judar ingick också i avantgardet för 1960-talets sexuella revolution. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse och Paul Goodman ersatte Marx, Trotskij och Lenin som obligatorisk revolutionär litteratur. Reich var främst inriktad på arbete, kärlek och sex medan Marcuse profeterade att en socialistisk utopi skulle göra människor fria att uppnå sexuell tillfredsställelse. Goodman skrev om de ”vackra kulturella konsekvenserna” som skulle följa med legaliseringen av pornografi: det skulle ”förädla all vår konst” och ”humanisera sexualiteten.”

Hypersexualiseringen av västerländsk kultur (den mest iögonfallande följden av det judiska övertagandet och faktiska monopoliseringen av den västerländska median och underhållningsindustrin) kan därför ses som den praktiska etnopolitiska tillämpningen av psykoanalytisk teori i en traditionell västerländsk kultur som till sin natur ansågs auktoritär, fascistisk och antisemitisk pga sin ”hämmande” sexualmoral. MacDonald påpekar att ”psykoanalys har varit en veritabel guldgruva av idéer för de som avser utveckla radikal kritik av västerländsk kultur” då dessa idéer påverkar tänkandet på många olika områden, ”däribland sociologi, barnuppfostran, kriminologi, antropologi, litteraturkritik, konst, litteratur och populärmedierna. Read more

Paul Singer and the Universality of “Anti-Semitism”

/80 Comments/in , , /by

One of the most fundamental positions for White advocates concerned with Jewish influence must be the conviction that antagonism against Jews lies in Jewish behavior rather than solely the cultural pathology or psychological tendencies of non-Jews. A major testing ground for this position is the necessity for anti-Jewish attitudes to be present among geographically, racially, and culturally diverse peoples, and for the reasons behind this antagonism to be fairly uniform. In Separation and Its Discontents Kevin MacDonald argued that a social identity theory of anti-Semitism is highly compatible with supposing that anti-Semitism will be a very common characteristic of human societies in general. Reasons for this pervasiveness lie in Jewish cultural separatism leading to the perception of the Jewish group as an alien entity; inter-group resource and reproductive competition; and finally, the fact that Jews are, for cultural and genetic reasons, highly adept in resource competition against non-Jews. Additionally, Jews are adept at influencing culture and creating and influencing intellectual and political movements which often run contrary to the interests of the host population. Wherever these behaviors and circumstances are present, they contribute to the arousal of hostility in a host population.

Despite overwhelming evidence in support of our position, the vast majority of Jewish historiography and apologetics continue to argue something quite different. Our opponents have successfully disseminated the view that anti-Semitism is a peculiarly Western phenomenon, rooted more or less in a cocktail of evil Christian theology, the implicit frustrations of capitalist society, the despotic nature of the Western family, and even repressed sexual desires. A key aspect of maintaining this narrative has been to downplay non-Western (mainly Muslim) anti-Semitism, or attempt to give it different features. However, as MacDonald has noted, “the remarkable thing about anti-Semitism is that there is an overwhelming similarity in the complaints made about Jews in different places and over very long periods of historical time.”[1] Of the universal themes noted by MacDonald, the theme of resource competition and economic domination is perhaps foremost. Read more

The Cuckservative Phenomenon

/183 Comments/in , , /by

ActOfLove (1)

The cuckservative meme is suddenly everywhere. It’s brash, it’s witty, and it’s often embedded in visually appealing graphics — a new art form really (see collection here). It’s effective partly because its messages are short and simple. The SPLC, NYTimes, ADL et al. have been using this strategy for decades. Terms like “White supremacist,” “racist,” “anti-Semite,” and “Nazi” have been devastatingly effective, but they are only effective because they are disseminated by our hostile elites. It’s no accident that, Jeet Heer, writing in The New Republic, says that the cuckservative meme originated in “the white supremacist movement.”

When someone makes such a claim, it’s supposed to be the end of the argument. These labels have zero intellectual content, and yet they have been extraordinarily effective in making a great many Whites think that it’s a moral imperative that they become a minority in societies they have dominated for hundreds or thousands of years. You’re not supposed to think when you hear them — just cringe at the thought of  being egregiously immoral as defined by people who have radically different ethnic interests than you do. They are intended to shut off debate before it can start by automatically tarring one side as evil.

Yes, I do think that Whites, like Koreans in Korea and Ethiopians in Ethiopia, should do their best to remain in control of the countries their ancestors fought and died for. I do think races are different, that Whites have interests because they are White, and that if things don’t change dramatically, the entire institutional structure built by Whites will eventually be destroyed and Whites victimized. And, yes, Jews, like any group and especially an elite group with enormous power in the media, politics, and the academic world, should be subjected to rational criticism. These views are profoundly moral points of view.

bush5

But now this same strategy has been bubbling up from the bottom due ultimately to the internet. And it combines  intellectual power with simplicity. Bob Whitaker, who is the presidential candidate for the American Freedom Party, pioneered this strategy with his  mantras — simple statements that, unlike the mantras of the establishment, make devastatingly accurate, intellectually unanswerable points: “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for everybody!”  “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.” I recall during my email debates on the CSU-LB faculty listserv that several times I made versions of the “Asia is for Asians…” argument. Not one response from these SJW’s who populate our departments of social sciences and humanities. Just move on as if the argument didn’t exist. Unlike the labels cooked up by our hostile elites that succeed only through power and relentless propaganda, the argument is compelling because it obviously reflects a basic truth. But, as usual, when the left can’t answer an argument, they ignore it and do their best to get those making it fired. It will be the same with cuckservative. Read more

The Indoctrination Game, Part 2: Jewish media influence as decisive in creating a positive public culture of homosexuality

/77 Comments/in , /by

Part 1

The recent Jewish sanctification of Alan Turing as noble gay victim and Nazi nemesis is the photographic negative of pre-and post-World War II Jewish efforts to smear Hitler and his National Socialist comrades as “sexual perverts.” For decades the supposedly sordid sex lives of Hitler and the Nazi leadership filled tomes. Allegations of homosexuality were often repeated in Social Democratic and Communist newspapers (often Jewish-owned and -controlled) in the years leading up to Hitler becoming German chancellor in 1933.

Jewish attempts to brand Hitler and other National Socialist leaders as sexual perverts have since been largely abandoned with the ascendant cultural Marxist assault on White heterosexual normativity since the 1970s. Two Harvard-educated (non-Jewish) homosexuals, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, authored what can only be described as an incredibly successful blueprint for marketing the radical homosexual agenda in the United States. In their 1990 book entitled After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear & Hatred of Gays in the 90’s, they advocated the demonization of those opposed to homosexuality, painting them as evil as possible until the general public comes to view such people as moral pariahs and avoids them. The authors suggested that Christians and others opposed to homosexuality should be labelled Klansmen, Nazis, racists or unbalanced freaks. Obviously, this approach draws on the long history of the media demonizing and pathologizing Whites who identify as Whites and see pursuing White interests as legitimate, a tradition that has its intellectual roots in the unholy nexus of the Frankfurt School and psychoanalysis.

Although TOO has emphasized that homosexuality should not be condemned by White advocates and that White homosexuals should also realize they have interests as Whites (see, e.g., here), the movement to promote a public culture of homosexuality is injurious for a variety of reasons, and certainly does not further the biological/ethnic interests of White homosexuals. It is deplorable that sexual non-conformists have become a central component of the “culture of the aggrieved” that permeates all Western societies and is a pillar of the political left.

Typical of the left, it has used its power to go beyond vilification to direct infringement on the freedoms of speech and religion of those who disapprove of homosexuality. With “gay marriage” legalized in Canada, Catholic Schools are having a difficult time teaching Catholic precepts on marriage and sexuality and an Ontario statute compels Catholic schools to host “Gay-Straight Alliance” clubs. In the U.S., many individuals and groups are being punished for what amount to thought crimes, such as the couple from Oregon (the same state that allows 15-year old children to have a state-funded sex change operation without parental consent) who were ordered to pay $135,000 for “emotional suffering” to two lesbians when they refused to provide a wedding cake for a gay wedding.  Read more

Cosa leggere, parte 1

/1 Comment/in /by
Homer

Homer

Italian translation of “What to read, Part 1”

Non esiste nessuna cosa come una letteratura di destra contro una letteratura di sinistra. C’è solo una buona letteratura contro una cattiva letteratura, con la definizione della bontà contrapposta alla malvagità che deriva dall’implicito bagaglio culturale e razziale di ognuno. Per più di mezzo secolo, insegnanti e studiosi hanno fatto discorsi pubblici e accademici ben allineati con i dogmi egualitari di odio nei confronti dei bianchi, e hanno letto delle liste ai loro studenti che erano costruite sulle basi di questi dogmi. Importanti romanzieri, (figure) chiave tra gli scienziati sociali, e autori sospettati di scrivere della prosa che andasse contro la corrente delle idee politiche dominanti, sono stati accantonati o rimossi dalla lista di letture.

I loro libri, semmai menzionati, ricevono un’interpretazione critica, incriminante, degradante, o caricaturale. Peggio, se qualcuno di loro oltrepassa i limiti sulla storiografia dati da un’attitudine alla censura autoimposta, come succede nel caso degli storici revisionisti in Europa o negli USA, loro potrebbero perdere il lavoro o andare in prigione.

1 Letteratura: Omero e il tragico

Uno può determinare l’identità di un autore dal suo stile e dalla sua narrativa. All’inizio del suo percorso autodidattico, un giovane studente dovrebbe evitare autori il cui stile e la sintassi sono noiosi, o che la loro tematica principale è difficile da comprendere. Uno studente bianco negli studi umanistici, dovrebbe per prima cosa iniziare con delle facili letture (tra) i classici, come Omero o i testi ugualmente semplici delle favole. I grandi scrittori amano la chiarezza dell’esposizione e non nascondono il loro ego dominante dietro ambigue sentenze e un gergo ermetico. Questo sfortunatamente non è sempre il caso per alcuni eminenti studiosi razzialisti e tradizionalisti, specialmente nel campo della scienza sociale. Molti bravi scienziati sociali spesso non sanno come elaborare le loro idee importanti in un linguaggio semplice. Perciò, per uno studente è necessario leggere per prima cosa i classici. Read more

Moderate Extremism: Fantasy and Reality in Modern British Politics

/47 Comments/in , /by

Let’s play “Spot the Difference.” Here are some beliefs held by dangerous Islamist extremists:

∙ Islam is the one true faith and should tolerate no competition or criticism.
∙ Muslims who abandon their faith should be executed.
∙ Anyone who insults the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) should be executed.
∙ Homosexuality is an abomination and homosexuals should be executed.
∙ Jews are malevolent Islamophobes who want to rule the world.
∙ Men are masters over women and must keep them firmly in their place.
∙ Muslims are superior to non-Muslims and may exploit them as they see fit.

And here are some beliefs held by moderate mainstream Muslims:

∙ Islam is the one true faith and should tolerate no competition or criticism.
∙ Muslims who abandon their faith should be executed.
∙ Anyone who insults the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) should be executed.
∙ Homosexuality is an abomination and homosexuals should be executed.
∙ Jews are malevolent Islamophobes who want to rule the world.
∙ Men are masters over women and must keep them firmly in their place.
∙ Muslims are superior to non-Muslims and may exploit them as they see fit.

Can you spot any differences? Me neither. The beliefs of Islamist extremists look identical to the beliefs of mainstream Muslims. But British politicians have to pretend otherwise. David Cameron has just made a speech about countering the “extremism” that threatens the vibrancy of Brave New Britain. Here he is describing the United Kommunity:

Over generations, we have built something extraordinary in Britain – a successful multi-racial, multi-faith democracy. It’s open, diverse, welcoming – these characteristics are as British as queuing and talking about the weather. It is here in Britain where different people, from different backgrounds, who follow different religions and different customs don’t just rub alongside each other but are relatives and friends; husbands, wives, cousins, neighbours and colleagues. (David Cameron’s speech on counter-extremism, 20th July 2015)

That was the fantasy. Later in the speech Cameron contradicted himself by admitting the reality:

Indeed, there is a danger in some of our communities that you can go your whole life and have little to do with people from other faiths and backgrounds. … It cannot be right, for example, that people can grow up and go to school and hardly ever come into meaningful contact with people from other backgrounds and faiths. That doesn’t foster a sense of shared belonging and understanding – it can drive people apart. … Areas of cities and towns like Bradford or Oldham [heavily enriched with Muslims] continue to be some of the most segregated parts of our country. (David Cameron’s speech)

So first Cameron claims that we’ve built “a successful multi-racial, multi-faith democracy”, then he admits that in some “communities … you can go your whole life and have little to do with people from other faiths and backgrounds.” That’s a funny kind of success, isn’t it? Read more

David Cameron takes on “non-violent extremists”

/59 Comments/in , /by

In a long career filled with achievement, historian David Irving has a new feather in his cap — as a poster boy for the British government’s new campaign against extremism. It is an accolade he shares with internet executioner ‘Jihadi John’.

Prime Minister David Cameron bizarrely chose to single out the revisionist historian as an example of someone beyond the pale in his major speech  on dealing with non-violent extremists who, he complains, manage to sneakily stay on “just the right side of the law”.

It was an outrageous slur: “When David Irving goes to a university to deny the Holocaust — university leaders rightly come out and condemn him. They don’t deny his right to speak but they do challenge what he says. But when an Islamist extremist goes there to promote their poisonous ideology, too often university leaders look the other way.”

So, quite apart from the ludicrousness of Irving ever being allowed to speak on campus, combating him and his books are part of “the struggle of our generation” as Cameron put it. The Irving reference, as with the Charlie Hebdo and internet Jewish conspiracies reference, was really a signal to the Jewish community, that their interests remain closest to his heart. Even the venue for his speech was a nominally Jewish school in Birmingham. Read more