Churchill — When Britain Said No

/106 Comments/in , /by

When it comes to stirring oratory, few speeches have the power to quicken the pulse like Winston Churchill’s “We shall fight on the beaches…”  from  June, 1940. Generations of British schoolchildren have learned how that voice, crackling over the airwaves, helped galvanise the nation to new heights of endurance in the struggle against an all-powerful foe.

Churchill’s grand aristocratic tones summoned up the spirit of British defiance from across the centuries. So British schoolchildren are taught anyway — and you still come across grey-haired veterans of those days who vividly remember where they were when they heard it on the wireless.

Shame then, that it was all a bit of a fraud.  For the recorded version of the speech we are all familiar with, was not made until nine years later at his Chartwell country residence with the old boy rumbling into a microphone while sitting up in his bed. (The original speech in the House of Commons was not recorded — extracts were read out by newsreaders).

That is one of the milder revelations in a bunker-buster of a BBC television program called Churchill: When Britain Said No  which told the story of how the victorious war time premier was overwhelmingly rejected at the 1945 general election.

Predictably, the keepers of the flame are outraged. The Winston Churchill Industry in both the USA and Britain have expressed their disgust that such a program could have been broadcast. A “hatchet job” opined Lee Pollock, director of the Winston Churchill Center in Chicago. In an article in The Spectator  Mr Pollock wrote that “When Britain Said No  is so one-sided and hysterical that it actually does a disservice to the revisionist cause.” Churchill’s family, too, were enraged and condemned the program as “designed to belittle Churchill’s record.”

Read more

Pictures and report from the Nathan Bedford Forrest event!

/4 Comments/in , /by

After witnessing the anti-Southern hysteria that has metastasized throughout the media and government in recent weeks I felt a pressing need to do something proactive. Of course, it’s certainly not as if our societal overseers didn’t hate the South and any symbol of our unique identity before the murders that took place in Charleston occurred, but they have since fully exploited the tragedy in order to launch an attempt to completely eradicate the Confederate flag and any memory of the righteous cause for which it stood. Their efforts have been particularly brutal and bloodthirsty in Memphis, where the local government unanimously passed a resolution to exhume the remains of General Nathan Bedford Forrest and his wife, as well as remove the monument that sits atop their graves. Not that it matters much, but Confederate Soldiers, Sailors and Marines who fought in The War of Northern Aggression were made U.S. Veterans by an act of Congress in 1957, U.S. Public Law 85-425, Sec 410, which was approved on May 23, 1958. This made all Confederate Veterans equal to all U.S. Military Veterans, but I digress.

This shocking display of hatred could not go unanswered. In faithful service to the Confederate cavalry my great-great-great-grandfather rode with Forrest at Shiloh. Upon reading the news about their desire to desecrate the grave of an American hero his spirit reminded me of Forrest’s own admonition to, “Get there first with the most men.” I had organized rallies in Memphis before and was determined to do so again. But, rather than rush in haphazardly I thought it would be most prudent to reach out to other acquaintances with similar interests. As it turns out, a pro-Forrest rally was already being planned by other local activists and instead of having two competing events it just made more sense to join in line with those who had already laid some ground work and use the influence of my radio program to provide auxiliary support and assist them in turning out a much larger crowd. We should always concern ourselves first with providing results rather than getting credit for something. [Continue reading James’ article at The Political Cesspool site; lots of great photos.]

The SS Empire Windrush: The Jewish Origins of Multicultural Britain

/78 Comments/in , , /by

‘Will you find out who is responsible for this extraordinary action?’
Oliver Stanley, M.P., June 1948.

The SS Empire Windrush holds a special place of infamy in the minds of British Nationalists. When the ship arrived at Tilbury docks from Jamaica in June 1948, carrying 417 Black immigrants, it represented more than just a turning point in the history of those ancient isles. In some respects it signalled the beginning of mass, organized non-White immigration into northwest Europe. Back in November, TOO published my research on the role of Jews in limiting free speech and manipulating ‘race relations’ in Britain in order to achieve Jewish goals and protect Jewish interests. I’ve recently been revisiting some of my past essays, delving deeper and expanding each of them in an effort that I hope will result in the publication of a book-length manuscript on aspects of Jewish influence. During this process, I’ve been particularly compelled to research further into the role of Jews in Britain’s immigration and racial questions. What I present in this essay is a survey of some interesting facts, which I hope to document and integrate further as my work on the volume proceeds.

One of the things that struck me most when I began looking into the origins of multicultural Britain was the hazy and confused background to the arrival of that notorious ship. First though, I might point out one of history’s bizarre ironies —  the vessel that would signal the end of racial homogeneity in Britain started life as a Nazi cruise liner. The ship began its career in 1930 as the MV Monte Rosa. Until the outbreak of war it was used as part of the German Kraft durch Freude (‘Strength through Joy’) program. ‘Strength through Joy’ enabled more than 25 million Germans of all classes to enjoy subsidized travel and numerous other leisure pursuits, thereby enhancing the sense of community and racial togetherness. Racial solidarity, rather than class position, was emphasized by drawing lots for the allocation of cabins on vessels like the Monte Rosa, rather than providing superior accommodation only for those who could afford a certain rate. Until the outbreak of war, the vessel was employed in conveying NSDAP members on South American cruises. In 1939 the ship was allocated for military purposes, acting as a troopship for the invasion of Norway in 1940. In 1944, the Monte Rosa served in the Baltic Sea, rescuing Germans trapped in Latvia, East Prussia and Danzig by the advance of the Red Army.

Read more

Ricardo Duchesne: Difesa Intellettuale dell’Occidente

/5 Comments/in /by

Translation of “Ricardo Duchesne’s Intellectual Defense of the West”

[This article is adapted from a longer version that appears in the Fall 2011 issue of The Occidental Quarterly magazine.]

C’è stato un tempo, non molto tempo fa, nel quale l’idea dell’unicità dell’occidente era recepita (come) una saggia (visione) nel mondo accademico. L’occidente era caratterizzato dall’essere fortemente legato alla libertà individuale, ad un governo rappresentativo, alla scienza, e all’esplorazione. L’intenso dinamismo dell’occidente è stato responsabile per aver trascinato il resto del mondo dal suo dormiente e arretrato (passato) radicato nel collettivismo, nella superstizione e ad una tradizione immutabile. Era una visione che coincideva con un periodo nel quale l’ovest aveva un forte senso di sicurezza culturale.

Ma tutto ciò è cambiato con l’avvento del multiculturalismo e con un Establishment accademico che èchiaramente di sinistra. Nel nuovo credo, l’occidente è visto come uno storico acquitrino il cui successo è dovuto interamente alla fortuna -combinato in alcuni casi ad un rapace sfruttamento dei non europei –  piuttosto che ad un qualcosa di unico, molto meno positivo, (è il giudizio) sul suo popolo e sulla sua cultura.

Non è una coincidenza che il declino dell’occidente come un qualcosa che ha a che fare con un’entità etnica è coinciso con il predominio di questa sinistra accademica e alle sue aspre critiche nei confronti dell’ovest motivate (da cause) politiche ed etniche. Con l’avvento del multiculturalismo in tutti i paesi occidentali non è solo la gente occidentale ad essere in grave pericolo di perdere il proprio predominio in zone che ha dominato per centinaia di anni –nel caso specifico dell’Europa, per svariati millenni. (Ma) è anche la cultura dell’occidente ad essere minacciata.

Duchense, un professore di sociologia all’università di New Brunswick, vuole cambiare tutto questo. L’Unicità della civiltà Occidentale è un’opera straordinaria scritta da uno studioso e pensatore eccezionalmente aperto. Read more

Nouvelle Manifestation Anti-Shomrim à Londres

/2 Comments/in /by

Original article: Another Anti-Shomrim demo in London

Article d’origine publié le 7 juillet 2015

“On est en Angleterre, c’est notre terre. On a fini d’avoir peur, car on n’a plus rien à perdre.” C’est avec ces paroles que Jez Turner, l’organisateur du Forum de Londres, a fait face à une foule vociférante de Juifs et d’antifas à la dernière manifestation anti-Shomrim dans le centre de Londres.

Une trentaine de Blancs nationalistes et patriotes issus de diverses organisations s’étaient réunis autour d’une banderole affichant le slogan “Égalité des Droits pour les Indigènes Blancs.” Ils protestaient contre la mise en place d’une unité de police juive dénommée “Shomrim” affectée à la communauté juive et financée par l’argent des contribuables.

Les manifestants étaient bien moins nombreux que la foule juive et antifa, transportée par autobus depuis différents points du pays, et qui s’amassait sur trois côtés du cortège. Mais les deux groupes étaient encore battus en nombre par l’énorme foule de spectateurs.

À mesure que Jez Turner énumérait une litanie “d’exploits” notables réalisés par les Juifs au cours des âges, ses paroles semblaient plonger la foule dans une indignation hystérique agitée de hurlements: “Arrêtez-le !”.

Vu le relatif succès, en avril dernier, de la première manifestation anti-Shomrim, les autorités de Londres étaient clairement décidées à ce que cela ne se reproduise pas. Elles ont largement réussi leur mission.

La deuxième manifestation s’est déroulée dans des conditions difficiles. L’un des organisateurs avait été arrêté la veille. Puis la police a imposé un changement de lieu, vers un coin reculé du quartier administratif de Whitehall. On était bien loin du quartier de Golders Green prévu au départ.

Comme il fallait s’y attendre, l’évènement a été ignoré par les médias à l’exception de Russia Today, qui a diffusé de nombreuses images des manifestants.

En particulier, ces images montraient comment les menaces de violence avaient lieu dans l’impunité.

Advertisement

Les discours sont disponibles ici :

Le grief central de ces interventions était non seulement qu’une communauté bénéficie de privilèges qui sont refusés à la population blanche indigène, mais que les médias passent la question sous silence.

Turner a dit qu’il était honteux que l’argent des contribuables serve à procurer des véhicules, des uniformes et des stages de formation, à la communauté juive.

Peter Rushton, rédacteur en chef adjoint de Heritage & Destiny Magazine, a décrit comment la liberté d’expression avait disparu en Grande-Bretagne. Il a décrit [les contre-manifestants] comme le “visage du terrorisme anti-britannique.”

Parmi les manifestants se trouvait un groupe nationaliste de Pologne qui arborait ses bannières. Après que l’un d’eux ait dit quelques mots en polonais, Jez Turner a scandé: “La Pologne aux Polonais, l’Angleterre aux Anglais, la Palestine aux Palestiniens et l’Europe aux Européens.” Ce fut le signal d’une nouvelle vague d’hystérie juive.

Fait notable, on n’apercevait qu’une poignée de visages sud-asiatiques [NdT: c-à-d pakistanais], ce qui montre que le recrutement de musulmans pour soutenir la cause des privilèges juifs, a étrangement échoué.

Une nouvelle manifestation est prévue pour Finchley [NdT: quartier du Nord de Londres]. Vu la détermination des autorités à neutraliser l’efficacité de telles actions, ce sera sûrement intéressant, d’autant plus que le gouvernement semble sur le point d’introduire un système “d’ordonnances de perturbation” [Disruption Orders] pour empêcher ceux qu’ils appellent les “extrémistes non-violents” de se déplacer librement dans le pays.

S’il faut encore une preuve de la dégénérescence du maintien de l’ordre à Londres, il suffit de regarder cette vidéo à partir de 1:30 lorsqu’un officier supérieur de police exprime son admiration pour le Shomrim, et décrit les retombées du meurtre du fusilier Lee Rigby dans les termes suivants :

Voilà pourquoi ça m’a tant intéressé d’en savoir plus sur le travail de Shomrim et en particulier concernant le travail effectué (…) dans l’arrondissement (…), et donc, le travail effectué suite au meurtre de Lee Rigby, le travail de protection de toutes les communautés de Londres, afin de tendre la main à la communauté musulmane et aux autres communautés, pour leur fournir notre aide et assistance.

Un militaire blanc se fait assassiner dans la rue par des musulmans. Et la police spéciale juive fournit son assistance à la communauté musulmane. Avec les encouragements et l’approbation des responsables blancs de la police.

How it could happen: The candidacy of Donald Trump

/183 Comments/in , , /by

We all rack our brains every day trying how to break through in a system that is completely stacked against us. How could it happen—a political movement that would ignite the imaginations of White America, depose the corrupt donor class in the Republican Party, and begin to really take the country back?

Right now, doing so is a huge uphill battle. The oppressive mainstream media environment is closed to obviously true messages that Whites have interests just like everybody else. Indeed, it is busy tearing down what’s left of traditional American culture. And despite the internet, the mainstream media, including outlets such as Fox News, continues to wield enormous power, and the vast majority of Americans, including educated Americans, accept its legitimacy and moral authority. Despite the First Amendment, we all know that there are a variety of very powerful social sanctions against anyone who contravenes the racial consensus.

Further, it is extremely difficult for a grass roots political process to gain traction in the U.S. where there are two entrenched political parties and winner-take-all elections, with no proportional representation. Political parties need money—big money, billionaire-type money, and they need highly recognizable names — neither of which is typically available to a grass roots movement. Such movements have a hard time getting traction or a sense of legitimacy, and it’s very difficult to get their word out, especially if it contravenes what our media elites want to hear.

But political celebrities have an enormous ability to shape public debate because the media cannot ignore them. The media can and will do all it can to destroy celebrities that err on the side of political incorrectness, but they can’t prevent the message from getting out. Read more

Liberal Cognitive Dissonance on South Africa

/140 Comments/in , /by
A peculiar thing happened while my liberal sister and I were driving near a Black area of Johannesburg on our way back to Pretoria from RO Tambo International airport — Anne expressed a palpable fear of being in proximity to the very people she’d championed less than two decades earlier.
My sister had not been back to South Africa for several years as she’d fled the country immediately after the fall of Apartheid. Like many wealthy liberals, she’d moved to Western Europe the moment the White-ruled government she loathed so much had been removed, and the ANC installed in its place.
I soon followed suit as literally everyone in my family, apart from my uncle, who’s since moved to Ghana for work, returned home to their countries of origin.
Within minutes of seeing predominantly Black faces carousing in the forecourts of the shanty town shebeens dotted along the M57 roadside — the sole toll-free highway connecting Joburg’s airport with Garsfontein, Pretoria, I began to realise my sister wasn’t exactly in her comfort zone.
“Do we have to drive through here?” She asked, as I turned and looked at her.
“It’s the only road to Garsfontein from Joburg airport.” I responded. “How else do you want us to get back to Aunty’s?”
“I don’t know. It just doesn’t seem like the sort of place we should be driving through.” My sister concluded, while nervously fumbling through her purse. (Anne is a staunch proponent of gun control in SA, the UK and US, so I doubted it was a pistol she was looking for.)
At first I wasn’t sure what to make of her request and conspicuous nervousness.

Read more