David Cameron règle le problème des “extrémistes non-violents”

/in /by

Original article: David Cameron takes on “non-violent extremists”

Article d’origine publié le 26 juillet 2015

Poursuivant sa longue carrière très productive, l’historien David Irving vient d’ajouter une nouvelle plume à son chapeau: le gouvernement britannique l’a en effet choisi comme emblème de sa nouvelle campagne contre l’extrémisme, une distinction qu’il partage avec le bourreau d’internet “Jihadi John”.

C’est cet historien révisionniste qui a bizarrement été cité par le Premier ministre David Cameron comme exemple d’individu qui dépasse les bornes. Dans ce discours marquant, Cameron se plaignait des extrémistes non-violents qui se débrouillent sournoisement pour rester “juste du bon côté de la loi”.

Cameron s’est livré à de la basse médisance en déclarant: “Quand David Irving se rend dans une université pour nier l’Holocauste – les responsables de l’université le dénoncent à juste titre. Ils ne contestent pas son droit de parole, mais ils contestent ce qu’il dit. En revanche, quand un extrémiste islamiste s’y rend pour promouvoir son idéologie délétère, les responsables de l’université regardent trop souvent ailleurs.”

Ainsi, sans s’arrêter sur l’idée ridicule qu’Irving puisse être invité un jour à s’exprimer sur un campus, on est censé croire qu’en s’opposant à lui et à ses livres, on participe “au combat de notre génération”, pour citer Cameron. L’allusion à Irving, tout comme les allusions à Charlie Hebdo et aux conspirations juives sur internet, étaient un simple signal donné à la communauté juive, pour leur assurer que leurs intérêts demeurent au plus près de son cœur. Même le lieu de son discours était une école de Birmingham théoriquement juive à l’origine. Read more

Attitudes on Immigration: Compassion for Whites; Ethnic Hardball and Crocodile Tears for Jewish Activists

/59 Comments/in , /by

What’s the population of the United States? About 320 million, you think? No, that statistic is both woefully out-of-date and grossly unjust. The actual, ethical population of the US is seven billion and rising. Funnily enough, that’s also the ethical population of the United Kingdom – and of Canada, France, Sweden and Australia. In fact, all European-majority nations have an ethical population of seven billion. Just ask Stosh Cotler, CEO of “Bend the Arc: A Jewish Partnership for Justice”:

Right now, at least 11 million men, women, and children are living in the United States with the real fear that they could be thrown into a detention center, deported, and torn from their families at any time. These are our neighbors, our friends, and our children’s classmates. Even if we don’t have a personal connection to any of the millions of undocumented people in America, they are people whose innate dignity deserves respect.

Today, upwards of 30,000 people are being held in detention centers across the country, many without any way to contact their families. Every day an average of 1,120 people are put on buses and discarded across the border. This is no way to treat people who have worked hard, paid their taxes, and contributed to the country like the rest of us — they are “different” only because they lack the right papers. (Why Immigration Reform Is A Jewish Issue, NationalJournal.com, 11th April 2014)

The logic is clear: it is nonsensical and unjust to discriminate between people who have the “right papers” for American citizenship and people who don’t. The difference between those two groups is illusory. This leads to a simple conclusion: that all seven billion people on Earth are actually American citizens. It’s just that most of them don’t have the right papers and don’t currently live there. And the same logic applies to Britain, Canada, France, Sweden, Australia and all other Western nations. Legalistic, petty-minded demands that all potential citizens of those nations have the “right papers” are a gross violation of their innate dignity as human beings. Read more

Jenji Kohan och den judiska hypersexualiseringen av västerländsk kultur

/in /by

Original Article: Jenji Kohan and the Jewish Hyper-Sexualization of Western Culture

Sexualisering Som det utförligt redogörs för Kritikkulturen, ansåg Freud och hans anhängare att antisemitism var en universell sjukdom som bottnade i undertryckt sexualitet. Den teoretiska grunden för detta finner man i Freuds Tre essäer om sexualiteten där han kopplade aggression till frustreringen av mänskliga drifter – i synnerhet sexdriften. Kevin MacDonald påpekar att: ”Fastän Freud själv senare utvecklade idén om dödsdriften som förklaring till aggression, har ett återkommande tema i den freudianska kritiken av västerländsk kultur, vilket bl.a. Norman O. Brown, Herbert Marcuse, och Wilhelm Reich exemplifierar, varit att frigörelsen av undertryckt sexualitet skulle leda till minskad aggression och bana väg för en era av universell kärlek.”

Utifrån denna uppfattning anses antisemitism vara en form av aggression, en följd av förnekad sexualitet, och psykoanalysens judiska uppdrag var att göra slut på antisemitismen genom att befria mänskligheten från sina sexuella bortträngningar. Individer som var upptagna av sex ansågs mindre benägna att bry sig om vad judar sysslade med, än mindre att motarbeta dem politiskt. Folk som ägnar större delen av sin tid åt jakt efter sexuell stimulering kommer sannolikt inte anordna pogromer eller hota det rika och mäktiga judiska etablissemanget. I sin, jewishquarterly.org /issuearchive/articled325.html?articleid=38 [now a hijacked site] ofta citerade essä, från Jewish Quarterly skriver Nathan Abrams att:

Judar i USA har varit sexuella revolutionärer. En stor andel av det som skrevs om sexuell frigörelse författades av judar. De som gick i bräschen för rörelsen som tvingade USA att anta en mer liberal syn på sex var judiska. Judar ingick också i avantgardet för 1960-talets sexuella revolution. Wilhelm Reich, Herbert Marcuse och Paul Goodman ersatte Marx, Trotskij och Lenin som obligatorisk revolutionär litteratur. Reich var främst inriktad på arbete, kärlek och sex medan Marcuse profeterade att en socialistisk utopi skulle göra människor fria att uppnå sexuell tillfredsställelse. Goodman skrev om de ”vackra kulturella konsekvenserna” som skulle följa med legaliseringen av pornografi: det skulle ”förädla all vår konst” och ”humanisera sexualiteten.”

Hypersexualiseringen av västerländsk kultur (den mest iögonfallande följden av det judiska övertagandet och faktiska monopoliseringen av den västerländska median och underhållningsindustrin) kan därför ses som den praktiska etnopolitiska tillämpningen av psykoanalytisk teori i en traditionell västerländsk kultur som till sin natur ansågs auktoritär, fascistisk och antisemitisk pga sin ”hämmande” sexualmoral. MacDonald påpekar att ”psykoanalys har varit en veritabel guldgruva av idéer för de som avser utveckla radikal kritik av västerländsk kultur” då dessa idéer påverkar tänkandet på många olika områden, ”däribland sociologi, barnuppfostran, kriminologi, antropologi, litteraturkritik, konst, litteratur och populärmedierna. Read more

Paul Singer and the Universality of “Anti-Semitism”

/80 Comments/in , , /by

One of the most fundamental positions for White advocates concerned with Jewish influence must be the conviction that antagonism against Jews lies in Jewish behavior rather than solely the cultural pathology or psychological tendencies of non-Jews. A major testing ground for this position is the necessity for anti-Jewish attitudes to be present among geographically, racially, and culturally diverse peoples, and for the reasons behind this antagonism to be fairly uniform. In Separation and Its Discontents Kevin MacDonald argued that a social identity theory of anti-Semitism is highly compatible with supposing that anti-Semitism will be a very common characteristic of human societies in general. Reasons for this pervasiveness lie in Jewish cultural separatism leading to the perception of the Jewish group as an alien entity; inter-group resource and reproductive competition; and finally, the fact that Jews are, for cultural and genetic reasons, highly adept in resource competition against non-Jews. Additionally, Jews are adept at influencing culture and creating and influencing intellectual and political movements which often run contrary to the interests of the host population. Wherever these behaviors and circumstances are present, they contribute to the arousal of hostility in a host population.

Despite overwhelming evidence in support of our position, the vast majority of Jewish historiography and apologetics continue to argue something quite different. Our opponents have successfully disseminated the view that anti-Semitism is a peculiarly Western phenomenon, rooted more or less in a cocktail of evil Christian theology, the implicit frustrations of capitalist society, the despotic nature of the Western family, and even repressed sexual desires. A key aspect of maintaining this narrative has been to downplay non-Western (mainly Muslim) anti-Semitism, or attempt to give it different features. However, as MacDonald has noted, “the remarkable thing about anti-Semitism is that there is an overwhelming similarity in the complaints made about Jews in different places and over very long periods of historical time.”[1] Of the universal themes noted by MacDonald, the theme of resource competition and economic domination is perhaps foremost. Read more

The Cuckservative Phenomenon

/183 Comments/in , , /by

ActOfLove (1)

The cuckservative meme is suddenly everywhere. It’s brash, it’s witty, and it’s often embedded in visually appealing graphics — a new art form really (see collection here). It’s effective partly because its messages are short and simple. The SPLC, NYTimes, ADL et al. have been using this strategy for decades. Terms like “White supremacist,” “racist,” “anti-Semite,” and “Nazi” have been devastatingly effective, but they are only effective because they are disseminated by our hostile elites. It’s no accident that, Jeet Heer, writing in The New Republic, says that the cuckservative meme originated in “the white supremacist movement.”

When someone makes such a claim, it’s supposed to be the end of the argument. These labels have zero intellectual content, and yet they have been extraordinarily effective in making a great many Whites think that it’s a moral imperative that they become a minority in societies they have dominated for hundreds or thousands of years. You’re not supposed to think when you hear them — just cringe at the thought of  being egregiously immoral as defined by people who have radically different ethnic interests than you do. They are intended to shut off debate before it can start by automatically tarring one side as evil.

Yes, I do think that Whites, like Koreans in Korea and Ethiopians in Ethiopia, should do their best to remain in control of the countries their ancestors fought and died for. I do think races are different, that Whites have interests because they are White, and that if things don’t change dramatically, the entire institutional structure built by Whites will eventually be destroyed and Whites victimized. And, yes, Jews, like any group and especially an elite group with enormous power in the media, politics, and the academic world, should be subjected to rational criticism. These views are profoundly moral points of view.

bush5

But now this same strategy has been bubbling up from the bottom due ultimately to the internet. And it combines  intellectual power with simplicity. Bob Whitaker, who is the presidential candidate for the American Freedom Party, pioneered this strategy with his  mantras — simple statements that, unlike the mantras of the establishment, make devastatingly accurate, intellectually unanswerable points: “Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for everybody!”  “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.” I recall during my email debates on the CSU-LB faculty listserv that several times I made versions of the “Asia is for Asians…” argument. Not one response from these SJW’s who populate our departments of social sciences and humanities. Just move on as if the argument didn’t exist. Unlike the labels cooked up by our hostile elites that succeed only through power and relentless propaganda, the argument is compelling because it obviously reflects a basic truth. But, as usual, when the left can’t answer an argument, they ignore it and do their best to get those making it fired. It will be the same with cuckservative. Read more

The Indoctrination Game, Part 2: Jewish media influence as decisive in creating a positive public culture of homosexuality

/77 Comments/in , /by

Part 1

The recent Jewish sanctification of Alan Turing as noble gay victim and Nazi nemesis is the photographic negative of pre-and post-World War II Jewish efforts to smear Hitler and his National Socialist comrades as “sexual perverts.” For decades the supposedly sordid sex lives of Hitler and the Nazi leadership filled tomes. Allegations of homosexuality were often repeated in Social Democratic and Communist newspapers (often Jewish-owned and -controlled) in the years leading up to Hitler becoming German chancellor in 1933.

Jewish attempts to brand Hitler and other National Socialist leaders as sexual perverts have since been largely abandoned with the ascendant cultural Marxist assault on White heterosexual normativity since the 1970s. Two Harvard-educated (non-Jewish) homosexuals, Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, authored what can only be described as an incredibly successful blueprint for marketing the radical homosexual agenda in the United States. In their 1990 book entitled After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear & Hatred of Gays in the 90’s, they advocated the demonization of those opposed to homosexuality, painting them as evil as possible until the general public comes to view such people as moral pariahs and avoids them. The authors suggested that Christians and others opposed to homosexuality should be labelled Klansmen, Nazis, racists or unbalanced freaks. Obviously, this approach draws on the long history of the media demonizing and pathologizing Whites who identify as Whites and see pursuing White interests as legitimate, a tradition that has its intellectual roots in the unholy nexus of the Frankfurt School and psychoanalysis.

Although TOO has emphasized that homosexuality should not be condemned by White advocates and that White homosexuals should also realize they have interests as Whites (see, e.g., here), the movement to promote a public culture of homosexuality is injurious for a variety of reasons, and certainly does not further the biological/ethnic interests of White homosexuals. It is deplorable that sexual non-conformists have become a central component of the “culture of the aggrieved” that permeates all Western societies and is a pillar of the political left.

Typical of the left, it has used its power to go beyond vilification to direct infringement on the freedoms of speech and religion of those who disapprove of homosexuality. With “gay marriage” legalized in Canada, Catholic Schools are having a difficult time teaching Catholic precepts on marriage and sexuality and an Ontario statute compels Catholic schools to host “Gay-Straight Alliance” clubs. In the U.S., many individuals and groups are being punished for what amount to thought crimes, such as the couple from Oregon (the same state that allows 15-year old children to have a state-funded sex change operation without parental consent) who were ordered to pay $135,000 for “emotional suffering” to two lesbians when they refused to provide a wedding cake for a gay wedding.  Read more

Cosa leggere, parte 1

/1 Comment/in /by
Homer

Homer

Italian translation of “What to read, Part 1”

Non esiste nessuna cosa come una letteratura di destra contro una letteratura di sinistra. C’è solo una buona letteratura contro una cattiva letteratura, con la definizione della bontà contrapposta alla malvagità che deriva dall’implicito bagaglio culturale e razziale di ognuno. Per più di mezzo secolo, insegnanti e studiosi hanno fatto discorsi pubblici e accademici ben allineati con i dogmi egualitari di odio nei confronti dei bianchi, e hanno letto delle liste ai loro studenti che erano costruite sulle basi di questi dogmi. Importanti romanzieri, (figure) chiave tra gli scienziati sociali, e autori sospettati di scrivere della prosa che andasse contro la corrente delle idee politiche dominanti, sono stati accantonati o rimossi dalla lista di letture.

I loro libri, semmai menzionati, ricevono un’interpretazione critica, incriminante, degradante, o caricaturale. Peggio, se qualcuno di loro oltrepassa i limiti sulla storiografia dati da un’attitudine alla censura autoimposta, come succede nel caso degli storici revisionisti in Europa o negli USA, loro potrebbero perdere il lavoro o andare in prigione.

1 Letteratura: Omero e il tragico

Uno può determinare l’identità di un autore dal suo stile e dalla sua narrativa. All’inizio del suo percorso autodidattico, un giovane studente dovrebbe evitare autori il cui stile e la sintassi sono noiosi, o che la loro tematica principale è difficile da comprendere. Uno studente bianco negli studi umanistici, dovrebbe per prima cosa iniziare con delle facili letture (tra) i classici, come Omero o i testi ugualmente semplici delle favole. I grandi scrittori amano la chiarezza dell’esposizione e non nascondono il loro ego dominante dietro ambigue sentenze e un gergo ermetico. Questo sfortunatamente non è sempre il caso per alcuni eminenti studiosi razzialisti e tradizionalisti, specialmente nel campo della scienza sociale. Molti bravi scienziati sociali spesso non sanno come elaborare le loro idee importanti in un linguaggio semplice. Perciò, per uno studente è necessario leggere per prima cosa i classici. Read more