Hugs Against Hate: Jacinda Ardern Postures for the Camera
Like chutzpah, narcissism comes in different forms for different people. Some are narcissistic about their faces or their physiques. But it would be difficult for the New Zealand prime minister Jacinda Ardern to be narcissistic in that way, because she’s a typically effete left-wing politician. Instead, as the Christchurch massacre confirmed, she’s a psychological narcissist. Like countless other SJWs, she postures and preens before a moral mirror, convinced of her own virtue and goodness.
You must trust the virtuous leftist elite
That’s why Ardern will now impose strict gun-controls on dangerous Whites in New Zealand, so they can’t rebel against the Islamically-enriched multi-racial Utopia being created for them by their moral superiors. I prefer the cynicism and common sense of that old reprobate William S. Burroughs (1914—97), who said: “After a shooting spree, they always want to take the guns away from the people who didn’t do it. I sure as hell wouldn’t want to live in a society where the only people allowed guns are the police and the military.”
Burroughs wasn’t a narcissist and didn’t believe in the benevolence or wisdom of any elite. He wanted ordinary people to be able to defend themselves and protect their freedoms.
I blame Orbán, Salvini and Trump: Judeo-Journo Jonathan Freedland
Burroughs was a stale pale male, of course, but not everyone in the stale pale male community agrees with him. Someone who certainly doesn’t is the propagandist Jonathan Freedland, a Jewish activist with a prominent position in the mainstream media in Britain. He sides with the virtuous Jacinda Ardern, not with the reprobate Burroughs. And when an Australian murders Muslims from the Third World in New Zealand, Freedland knows exactly who is to blame: the prime minister of Hungary, the interior minister of Italy and the president of America. After the Christchurch massacre, he plugged the standard Jewish line on mass immigration and Islamic enrichment. All criticism of these things is evil and has to end:
Consider the message of Viktor Orbán, prime minister of Hungary, who repeatedly casts himself as the defender of a Christian European civilisation under mortal threat from Muslim immigration. Or Matteo Salvini in Italy, who presses the same buttons, winning power last year by arguing, among other things, that: “I don’t want to end up like Great Britain, which has Islamic courts instead of British courts.”
If these men give legitimacy to the narrative of “replacement”, then their ideas are, in turn, legitimated by the populist-in-chief in the White House. White nationalists in Europe and beyond were hugely encouraged by the 2017 speech Donald Trump delivered in Warsaw, depicting a Christendom under siege. “Do we have the desire and the courage to preserve our civilisation in the face of those who would subvert and destroy it?” he asked. (To prevent another Christchurch we must confront the right’s hate preachers, The Guardian, 15th March 2019)
Freedland wants this “ecosystem of hate” cleansed by censorship and tough internet controls. Labour councils in Rotherham, Huddersfield and Telford had — and have — the same attitude to the “narrative” of White girls being raped by Muslim men. It’s a nasty narrative, so they censored it and refused to listen.
White Lives Don’t Matter
The result was decades of rape, child-prostitution and ruined lives. And murder too. One enterprising Muslim child-rapist, Azhar Ali Mehmood, burned three members of a White family to death. According to the Birmingham Mail, the victims were “his girlfriend Lucy Lowe, 16, her sister, Sarah, 17, and her mother, Eileen, 49.” As I’ve pointed out before, Lucy Lowe wasn’t his girlfriend but his concubine, raped from the age of 13 while police and other officials in Birmingham attended diversity courses and sniffed assiduously for thought-crime among Whites.
Freedland and the other leftists wringing their hands about Christchurch don’t care about White girls being raped, prostituted and murdered by non-White Muslims. It’s happening to working-class Whites, whom middle-class Guardianistas see as “racist, resistant to change, homophobic and generally reactionary.” The Labour party, on the other hand, should definitely care. It was founded to champion the White working-class, but it long ago abandoned its founding purpose and began to work for other interests. Denis MacShane, the Labour MP for Rotherham, was rightly called one of the Jewish “community’s greatest champions” when he was jailed for fraud in 2013. He also worked assiduously for globalist causes and the European Union. He saw the White working-class merely as useful dupes whose votes would get him into parliament, where he could work against them on behalf of Jews, non-Whites and big business.
For “Labour” read “Lawyer”
MacShane’s attitudes are mainstream in the Labour party, which served the Jewish minority under Blair and now serves Muslims and other non-White minorities under Corbyn. As I described in “Vote for Us, You Miserable Scum,” the rich middle-class lawyer Emily Thornberry, Labour Shadow Foreign Secretary, views White working-class men with contempt. She publicly sneered at “white van man,” a symbol of the self-employed White builders, plumbers and electricians whom Labour deliberately impoverished with cheap labour from Eastern Europe. The rich non-White lawyer Shami Chakrabarti, the Shadow Attorney General, expressed similar contempt for “Essex man,” a symbol of the White working-class in southern England. Speaking to a Jewish audience at the Labour party conference in 2016, she begged Jews not to abandon the party: “Please don’t go. Don’t leave me here, don’t leave me locked in a room with Essex man. … I don’t want to be left alone with people who lack the vision and views that you and I bring to this party as members of minority groups.”
Chakrabarti is a minority supremacist, believing that minorities are ethically and intellectually superior to the White working-class. Now she has spoken out about the Christchurch massacre, telling us that the internet cannot “continue to be an ungoverned space” and condemning the BBC for allowing “the leader of Generation Identity’s UK branch, Benjamin Jones,” to discuss the massacre. Chakrabarti wants the internet to become a “governed space,” where haters like Jones will be silenced. She and other virtuous leftists will do the governing, of course. This authoritarianism might seem ironic, because Chakrabarti once headed Liberty, a civil rights organization supposedly devoted to protecting free speech and other essential liberal values. It’s not ironic: Chakrabarti never believed in genuine liberalism, but always in cultural Marxism.
Sajid Javid the shabbos goy
Another firm believer in cultural Marxism and censorship is Britain’s Pakistani Home Secretary, Sajid Javid. He’s a millionaire ex-banker who wants to be prime minister and knows which small but highly influential minority he needs on his side. In the United States, he would be grovelling before AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. In Britain, he grovels before the Board of Jewish Deputies and Conservative Friends of Israel (CFI). Javid has spent years slathering Jews with sycophancy and convincing them that, like May, Cameron and Blair before him, he will make Jewish interests his first and only concern.
Jews are, of course, very interested in stamping out free speech. Javid is eager to oblige. His comments on the Christchurch massacre mixed gaseous pro-vibrancy rhetoric with solid promises of more censorship:
It is devastating to think how cruelly and suddenly [the] peace [of Muslim worship] was shattered in Christchurch. By a terrorist atrocity driven by a warped far-right ideology. A hate-fuelled attack on the freedom and values that unite us all. … Muslims are an integral — and hugely valuable — part of our society and I will redouble efforts to keep you safe. … the threat from the extreme right wing is growing. This is proof that terror has no religion. Whether far right or Islamist, terrorist atrocities are about hate, nothing else. … The Government is taking action on many fronts to fight hate. We are bearing down on attacks against those of all faiths and none with our refreshed Hate Crime Action Plan. … Last week I chaired an anti-Muslim hatred roundtable, with the Communities Secretary, with Muslim leaders and pledged to do even more. …
Allowing terrorists to glorify in the bloodshed or spread more extremist views can only lead to more radicalisation and murders. This is the type of illegal behaviour that our new Online Harms White Paper will address. Tech companies who don’t clean up their platforms should be prepared to face the force of the law. … We are hugely proud of our Muslim citizens who contribute so much to every walk of British life. Our diversity is our strength. … Together we are stronger. We must stand side by side against hate. Side by side with all British Muslims. … And above all, send a clear message — terrorism will never be allowed to divide us. (Terror like New Zealand attack must NEVER divide us, says Sajid Javid, The Daily Express, 16th March 2019)
Amid the gaseous rhetoric, Javid is making promises that will be very pleasing to the Board of Deputies and Conservative Friends of Israel. He wants to stop hate-sites like the Occidental Observer from spreading their vile messages and criticizing the “Muslim citizens who contribute so much to every walk of British life.”
Muslims’ many contributions
For example, think of how much Muslim customs like marrying close relatives and mutilating their daughters’ private parts have contributed to medical knowledge in Britain. Doctors have had the chance to study exotic genetic diseases and complicated genital injuries that they might otherwise never have encountered. Thank you, Muslim community! Or rather: Shukran! And think of the spirit of enterprise Muslims have brought to the creation of child-prostitution rings in stale pale conurbations like Rotherham and Oxford. Shukran! And think of the success of Muslim politicians like Lutfur Rahman in bringing “third-world village politics” to staid first-world London. Shukran!
Sajid Javid is sickened by free speech
If Sajid Javid and Shami Chakrabarti have their way, the Occidental Observer won’t be able to thank Muslims for making such enormous contributions to Western life. And we won’t able to point out that Javid is lying when he talks about “the freedom and values that unite us all” in the face of “hate-fuelled attacks.” Three years ago, in March 2016, there was a “hate-fuelled attack” on Asad Shah, a gentle and much-respected Muslim in Glasgow who had used his freedom to broadcast a message of mutual tolerance, understanding and respect between different religions. Shah was stabbed and stamped to death by a fanatical bigot inspired by a hate-filled killer overseas. The killer had assassinated a politician whom he was serving as a bodyguard. And what was the politician’s offence? He had supported a Christian woman sentenced to death for blasphemy after a grotesquely unjust trial.
Muslims hate freedom
The murder of Asad Shah in Glasgow was a perfect opportunity for Britain’s “Muslim citizens” to show their respect for “the freedom and values that unite us all.” Metaphorically speaking, they seized that opportunity with both hands, tore it to pieces, and dropped it contemptuously into the gutter. Asad Shah received no support from mainstream Muslims because he belonged to the Ahmadi sect and, in their eyes, held heretical views. Glasgow Central Mosque refused to attend an “anti-extremism event” held in memory of Shah. Instead, it continued to side with the Pakistani assassin, Mumtaz Qadri, who had inspired Shah’s Pakistani murderer, Tanveer Ahmed. A month before Shah’s murder, an imam at Glasgow Central Mosque expressed his “pain” when Mumtaz Qadri was executed in Pakistan, called him a “true Muslim,” and pronounced a blessing on him. Supporters of Qadri have toured other British mosques and celebrated Qadri’s forthright defence of the Prophet Muhammad. When Sajid Javid spoke of “the freedom and values that unite us all,” he was talking utter and obvious nonsense. Muslims in Britain do not believe in freedom: they believe in Islam, which means “submission.”
That’s why Muslim leaders greeted Asad Shah’s murder with silent approval. The murders in Christchurch, on the other hand, have inspired hundreds of Muslim leaders to call for more censorship in a stern and self-righteous letter to the Guardian:
The massacre of Muslims did not just begin with bullets fired from the barrel of Tarrant’s gun. Rather it was decades in the making: inspired by Islamophobic media reports, hundreds and thousands of column inches of hatred printed in the press, many Muslim-hating politicians and unchecked social-media bigotry. Muslims have been constantly cast as suspect communities, foreigners with barbaric views who are a threat to our society. We are now reaping the awful outcome of systemic and institutionalised Islamophobia woven into many sections of our societies. This racism and xenophobia that has been allowed to fester for far too long — has deadly consequences — presenting one of the most significant challenges to civilised society in contemporary times. (Anti-Muslim bigotry cannot go unchecked, The Guardian, 18th March 2019)
Chutzpah is a Jewish word, but it applies perfectly to that letter. In their own nations, Muslims create tyranny, corruption and intellectual stagnation. When they emigrate to the West, they contribute to “civilised society” with mass murder, gang-rape, child-prostitution, female genital mutilation, consanguineous marriage, vote-rigging, financial fraud, and welfare dependency. Muslims don’t hit the headlines for winning Nobel prizes in the West, but for committing massacres and suicide-bombings, turning European cities into rape-zones, and trying to murder the novelist Salman Rushdie.
And then they demand that critics of their many and glaring flaws be silenced — see above.
Muslims don’t belong in the West
But Jonathan Freedland also wants “Islamophobia” to be silenced and he’s a Jew, not a Muslim. Like the Jewish journalist Bari Weiss in the United States, Freedland sees Jews and Muslims as “friends and political allies” against Western civilization. That’s why he uses the Christchurch massacre to attack Viktor Orbán, the Hungarian prime minister who is trying to defend Western civilization. But in his attack on Orbán, Freedland doesn’t mention one very obvious thing: there are no Muslims being massacred in Hungary.
And no kaffirs are being massacred or gang-raped in Hungary either. This is because Hungary has refused to allow itself to be enriched by Islam. With no Muslims, it has none of the pathologies caused or provoked by Muslims. Viktor Orbán understands the truth: that Muslims don’t belong in the West and that Whites never voted for them to come here. Muslims have their own nations — fifty of them, in fact — and they need to return there as soon as possible.