An Abomination of Immigrants: How Dissent Is Demonized as “Divisive” by the Lying Left

Leftists love lying. That’s one of the great political truths of our time. Ironically enough, it means you can often and easily extract the truth from leftist statements. Simply invert them. What leftists call “bad” must be good. What leftists call “false” must be true. And vice versa. But sometimes you have to be subtler than that. For example, leftists are very fond of calling their opponents “divisive.” But what do they really mean by it? They mean dissenting. If you disagree with leftism, you’re being divisive and should just shut up.

The silence of the shepherds

That’s why we’ve just seen “Divisive!” chanted in chorus by the left in response to a very successful “far-right” march in London. The march was organized by the Zionist shill Tommy “Rubinstein” Robinson, who appears to be running a crypto-currency scam on his deluded supporters. But the march was still a cheering sight for genuine White nationalists. As Nick Griffin has pointed out: “it’s time to go fishing” — there are great opportunities in “the explosive growth of populist protest.” Naturally enough, the Church of England has responded to the march just as their Faith commands. And what is their Faith? It’s not Godliness, but Guardianism. Lying leftism is the unshakeable faith of all senior Anglicans, from archbishops like the Arch-Invertebrate of Contemptible to monarchs like Elizabeth the Evil and Chuck the Cuck, the traitorous secular heads of the Church. Decade after decade, senior Anglicans have remained resolutely silent as White girls have been raped, tortured and murdered by non-White Muslims in towns and cities all over England, from Oxford and Bristol in the south to Rotherham and Carlisle in the north. Anglicans have also remained silent about abominations like these:

∙ The abduction, rape, torture and murder of the White schoolgirl Mary-Ann Leneghan by a Black gang

∙ The abduction, torture and incineration of the White schoolboy Kriss Donald by a Pakistani gang

∙ The rape, murder and dismemberment of the White schoolgirl Charles Downes, whose non-White killers have never been brought to justice

∙ The abduction and incineration of the White mother Tracey Mertens by two Blacks who again have never been brought to justice

∙ The scores or even hundreds of life-shortening rapes and sexual assaults committed by the Black “Windrush Warrior” Delroy Easton Grant against elderly White women (and some men) in London

∙ The murder and rape committed by the Black Windrush Warrior Ryland Headley against elderly White women

∙ The horrible genetic diseases caused in British cities like Bradford by the depraved and disgusting Muslim “custom” of marrying close relatives

Jesus said: “Suffer the little children to come unto me.” Senior Anglicans say: “Suffering children? That’s fine by me!” Jesus also said: “Feed my sheep.” Senior Anglicans say: “Feed God’s sheep to wolves.” That’s why the Church of England has thundered against the march in London. Rape-gangs in Rotherham? Not a problem. Crosses being carried in London? Big problem.

A Battling Bishop

But let’s be fair to the C of E. It put forward a perfect  spokesman to condemn the march: the battling Bishop of Kirkstall in Yorkshire. He’s called Arun Arora, he’s non-White, and he bears a striking example of what I like to call pedo-punim. That’s my Yiddish translation of the more familiar pedo-face, which is the face of someone who looks like a pedophile.[i] Have a look at Bishop Arora and decide for yourself:

The pedo-punim of Arun Arora, the fat, greasy non-White Bishop of Kirkstall (image from The Guardian)

Is that a pedo-punim or what? Yes, it’s definitely a pedo-punim. And here’s how pedo-punim’d Arun Arora harped on the theme of “division” in response to the “racist” march in London:

Bishop calls on Christians to reclaim England flag from ‘toxic tide of racism’

A Church of England bishop has called on Christians to reclaim the flag and their faith from rightwing activists, saying both were being desecrated by people seeking to divide the nation.

The Right Rev Arun Arora, the bishop of Kirkstall and the C of E’s co-lead on racial justice, made his comments in a sermon days after more than 110,000 people marched through London in a rightwing protest, many carrying crosses.

Some held banners and placards displaying verses from the Bible. Protesters chanted “Christ is King”, recited the Lord’s Prayer and were urged to defend “God, faith, family, homeland”.

Speaking at St James church in Manston, Leeds, Arora said Christians should not be “neutral in the face of violence and injustice. As followers of Christ, our duty is clear. To challenge those whose lips drip with vituperation and hate, to refute division and to restore dignity in building the common good”.

Rightwing activists have increasingly invoked “Christian values” and the need to defend a “Judeo-Christian culture” against an Islamic threat. Tommy Robinson, who led last Saturday’s march, reportedly was “led to Christ” while in prison earlier this year.

Before the march, the Right Rev Anderson Jeremiah, the [Indian] bishop of Edmonton, issued a statement saying the march was “inextricably linked to voices and movements that have previously contributed to division and racial intolerance. This is at odds with everything we, and millions of Londoners, stand for”.

Bishops in the diocese of Southwark also issued a statement raising concerns that the march would “cause fear among minority groups. We wish to reject intolerance and we stand in solidarity with [those] celebrating the rich diversity of our communities”.

The Right Rev Rose Hudson-Wilkin, the [Black] bishop of Dover, said: “While we must continue to champion the right to peaceful protest, I also want to affirm our responsibility to ensure that such expressions do not become platforms for intolerance or aggression.”

The language used by Arora in his sermon on Wednesday was significantly stronger than his colleagues’ earlier statements. He said the “rising toxic tide of racism” was being felt all over the country. “Our overriding duty as the church … requires us to stand firm in a faith rooted in the common good.”

Protests outside hotels housing asylum seekers and flag-flying across the country had “barely concealed racist overtones”, he added. “Sentiments that even five years ago would have been considered shameful are now being broadcast at public gatherings, accompanied by cheers and applause. Such sentiments have been accompanied by reckless voices of hate seeking to camouflage themselves in the language of patriotism and faith all the while debasing both.” […] Arora and the Right Rev Rosemarie Mallett, the [Black] bishop of Croydon, were appointed to jointly lead the C of E’s work on racial justice earlier this year. (“Bishop calls on Christians to reclaim England flag from ‘toxic tide of racism’,” The Guardian, 18th September 2025)

Rosemarie Mallett, an anti-White Black Pseudo-Bishop in the Christ-denying Church of England (image from Keep the Faith)

Surprise, surprise! Arun Arora and all the other non-White clerics mentioned in that article are using lying leftist rhetoric — “rich diversity” and so on — to defend the interests of non-Whites like themselves. But they certainly aren’t defending Christianity or the indigenous Whites of Britain. Let’s repeat Arun Arora’s own words: “As followers of Christ, our duty is clear.” He’s right: their duty is clear — crystal clear. But no senior Anglicans currently perform that duty. Instead, they do the complete opposite of their duty. Bishops don’t defend Christ but deny Christ. At the same time, they defend Islam, celebrate Muslim immigration and ignore the abominations created by it. Why have the Arch-Invertebrate of Contemptible and the Battling Bishop of Kirkstall never spoken out against Muslim rape-gangs? Because that would mean criticizing non-Whites and admitting that non-White immigration is bad for Britain. Rather than admit the toxic truth, they prefer to peddle leftist lies.

Pedo-punims on parade: a few of the Muslim child-rapists defended by Arun Arora and other followers of Anti-Christ

In short, they’re followers of anti-Christ, not followers of Christ. Leftism is their true faith, not Christianity. They should ponder these words of the Prophet Isaiah: “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” What Isaiah decried is exactly what leftists like Arora do. That’s why Arora accuses the right of promoting “division.” He is inverting the truth: it’s the pro-migrant left that promotes division, not the anti-migrant right. Is it cohesive to import non-Whites who don’t speak English and don’t practise Christianity, who cut the clitorises off their daughters and consume far more in taxes than they ever contribute? Of course not — it’s divisive. What could be more divisive than flooding a technologically advanced White Christian nation with low-IQ non-White Muslims from lands of savagery like Somalia and Pakistan?

Ilhan Omar, a Somali leftist who uses Jewish lies to attack White America (image from Wikipedia)

Immigration by Somalis and Pakistanis is genuinely divisive. And damaging. And dangerous. Obviously, then, leftists celebrate it and call all objections to it “divisive.”  And leftists in America have given a Somali woman called Ilhan Omar a leading role in their war on Whitey. To be fair again, Omar is far from being a typical Somali. How could she be a typical Somali when she has an IQ in triple figures? But she’s very typical of Somalis in the hate she bears for White America and for the White men who created America. In August 2024 she fiercely condemned the future vice-president, J.D. Vance, for speaking the truth about both her in particular and Somalis in general. For example, Vance accurately said that Omar herself was ungrateful to America and that Somalis have re-created violent, crime-ridden Mogadishu in formerly peaceful, law-abiding Minneapolis. Omar didn’t dispute the truth of what Vance said. She’s a leftist and truth doesn’t interest her. Instead, she fired off leftist rhetoric, including favorite terms like “spew,” “hateful” and (of course) “divisive”:

“The ignorant and xenophobic rhetoric spewed by Mr Vance is not just troubling — it’s dangerous and un-American. I love America fiercely, that’s why I’ve dedicated my life to public service,” she wrote. Omar added: “America deserves better than Vance’s hateful, divisive politics. We are a nation of immigrants, and we will continue to welcome the tired, the poor, the huddled masses yearning to breathe free — no matter how much it terrifies small-minded men like JD Vance.” (“‘Dangerous and un-American’: new recording of JD Vance’s dark vision of women and immigration,” The Guardian, 31st August 2024)

There was inversion in what Omar wrote. There was also irony. If a leftist calls something “un-American,” it is of course the opposite: entirely and authentically American. What is in fact “un-American” was Omar’s own rhetoric about America being “a nation of immigrants” and a haven for “the huddled masses yearning to breathe free.” She wasn’t quoting the Declaration of Independence or any fundamental text of true American history. No, she was quoting Jewish propaganda. The “huddled masses” are celebrated in a poem by the ethnocentric Jew Emma Lazarus that leftists have attached to the Statue of Liberty. Yes, in White America Jews urge goyim to welcome “huddled masses” of non-White outsiders. But in Jewish Israel, Jews rain high explosive on “huddled masses” of non-White Palestinians.

Expel invaders, execute traitors

As for “nation of immigrants” — well, that lie about America has been plugged by Jews since the 1950s. As I’ve pointed out before, it has all the coherence and honesty of “rope of sand” or “chariot of soup.” The accurate and honest term would be “an abomination of immigrants.” A true nation is a bond of blood, of shared history, language, religion and culture. Immigration always weakens nations. At worst, it destroys them. And the immigration favored by leftists is, of course, the worst kind of all. Leftists open the borders most eagerly to those who are most distant in race, religion and culture from White Westerners.

“I’m so glad you’re safe here” — traitorous Chuck the Cuck schmoozes Sudanese Blacks on Holocaust Memorial Day (image from HMD Memorial Trust)

In other words, they flood the First World with the Third World. And Third-World people inevitably carry Third-World pathologies. The lying leftist term for America is “nation of immigrants.” The accurate and honest term would be “abomination of immigrants.” The same goes for Britain and every other enriched Western nation. We are not blessed by Blacks and other non-Whites. No, we are cursed by them. But the curse will be lifted. Non-Whites like Arun Arora and Ilhan Omar will return where they belong. After that, we can deal with traitors like Boris Johnson and Chuck the Cuck, the so-called king who heads the so-called Church of England.

[i]  I prefer pedo-punim to pedo-face because the Yiddish word punim, meaning “face,” is ugly and alliterative, on the one hand, and accurately implies that pedophilia is characteristically Jewish, on the other. And you don’t have to take my word on the Jewishness of pedophilia. No, take the word of a Jewish professor writing in The Jewish Chronicle: “It’s not just Kubrick and Sellers who made Lolita a Jewish film. The story’s theme of an outsider battling against the social order is — despite the troubling subject matter — typically Jewish.”