David Renton is a Jew. And a lawyer. And a veteran anti-fascist. Obviously, then, he’s far too intelligent, dialectically adept and syllogistically skilled to pwn himself in the crass fashion of the fat food-filcher Billy Bunter, one of the greatest comic characters in English literature:
[A]t that moment Nugent opened the cupboard to lift out the cake. There was no cake to be lifted out. Nugent stared at the spot where a cake had been, and where now only a sea of crumbs met the view. …
“Bunter, you podgy pirate!” exclaimed Harry Wharton. … “Where’s that cake?”
“How should I know? I never even looked into the cupboard, and I never saw any cake when I looked in, either—”
“Scrag him!”
“Boot him!”
“I-I-I say, you fellows, it wasn’t me,” yelled Bunter. “I-I expect you put it somewhere else. It wasn’t there when I ate it — I mean, when I didn’t eat it — If you think I scoffed that cake, I can jolly well say — whoooop! Whoooop! Yarooooh!” (Bunter Comes for Christmas, 1959)
“Sneers of cold command”: the Jewish anti-fascists David Renton (left) and Daniel Trilling
“It wasn’t there when I ate it” — the veteran anti-fascist David Renton would never say anything as consummately stupid and crassly self-convicting as that. But he came pretty close in a recent article he wrote about defending vulnerable non-White men from the “racist notions” of local White women in southern England:
At the start of August, I was one of the organisers of the demo outside the Thistle Barbican hotel [in London]. That protest was called by a meeting of 50 people representing around 20 anti-racist groups. We were a counter-protest to an event calling for the hotel to be closed on racist grounds. […] No far-right organisation was backing the anti-hotel protests. The motivation on their side appeared to be a hostility towards single men, which was based on racist notions about the sexuality of foreigners. The key organisers of the campaign were all women, and they had a local base. After the demo was over, activists would still face the problem of having to isolate them. All this would take time, the best the demo could achieve would be a breathing space before the real work began. (“Working with Stand up to Racism — the good, the bad, the deeply annoying,” David Renton’s personal blog, 21st August 2025)
When Billy Bunter said the cake wasn’t there when he ate it, he was convicting himself out of his own mouth. David Renton is doing the same when he admits that the “key organizers” of the “anti-hotel protests” are all local women. That is, they are women with direct experience of the behavior of young non-White men like those in the hotel. Or they have female relatives and friends whose stories they trust. But Renton has to pretend that the motivation of these women is not direct experience but “hostility towards single men, which was based on racist notions about the sexuality of foreigners.”
Censor reality, smear realists
What happened to those two core principles of the left, “Believe Women” and “Trust Women’s Lived Experience”? Well, they had to give way to two even more core principles of the left: “Reality Is Racist” and “Preach Equality, Practise Hierarchy.” When reality contradicts ideology, leftists have a simple solution: censor reality and smear realists as “racist.” Accordingly, while leftists like Renton claim to be deeply concerned about protecting women from male violence, they happily abandon White women and girls seeking protection against non-White men who are higher in the leftist hierarchy of racial privilege. Indeed, leftists go further: as rape-gang redoubts like Rotherham have proved, they will actively assist racially privileged non-White men to commit sex-crimes against racially unprivileged White women and girls.
“Hear and obey, goyim!” Jewish judge David Bean overturns a pro-White injunction (video from Vox Populi)
That is what David Renton and his fellow anti-fascists are trying to do in their “counter demonstration” against local women with “lived experience” of the behavior of the so-called asylum-seekers. The local women and girls are White, the imported men are non-White. Therefore, in leftist eyes, the non-White men should be free to prey as they please on the White women and girls. That’s why a panel of leftist judges acted for the Labour government and overturned an injunction won by a local council in Essex against a hotel housing asylum-seekers, one of whom has now been found guilty of sexual assaults against “two teenagers and a woman.” The injunction said that the hotel had to stop housing asylum-seekers, which would obviously help protect local White women. But leftists don’t want to protect White women: they want to maintain the predatory privilege of non-White men. Accordingly, the Labour government appealed against the injunction and leftist judges duly overturned it, arguing that the rights of foreign non-White men trumped all concerns of local residents. The senior judge who intoned the anti-White ruling was a Jew called David Bean, who “was educated at St Paul’s School, an all-boys private school in Barnes, London.”
Importing sex-criminals
The Jewish lawyer David Renton was educated at an even more exclusive private school called Eton, also the alma mater of the part-Jewish prime ministers Boris Johnson and David Cameron. Renton claims to have “loathed” Eton, which is why he became a revolutionary socialist and joined the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), a Trotskyist sect led by the charismatic Israeli Jew Tony Cliff (aka Yigael Gluckstein). But in fact Renton fully absorbed one aspect of Eton’s elitism. Like his supposed political opponents Johnson and Cameron, he believes that ordinary Whites should have no say over immigration and over who enters their neighborhoods. Johnson and Cameron both promised to drastically reduce immigration; Johnson and Cameron both proceeded to massively increase it.
More vibrant migrants = more sexual violence
Strangely enough, as more and more non-White men have enriched the British Isles, we’ve seen more and more rapes and other sex-crimes. We’ve also seen more and more White women join the “far right” and campaign against non-White migration. Could it be that these women are basing their opposition to non-White migration on their “lived experience” of sexual assault and harassment by non-White men? Not according to David Renton. Here’s part of a mansplaining article he wrote for the Guardian:
When we deal with the far right now, we are facing a movement that is pushing forward a group of female leaders — that feels different from five years ago, let alone 50 years since. In Islington, one of the speeches came from a woman described as running a local nursery (it was read out on her behalf). The contemporary far right is focused on pushing a single narrative about refugees, all based on the same logic — that the people in the hotel are single men, are foreigners, and on both scores are likely to be sexual predators.
This argument wins supporters, and it shields them from accusations that they are extremists. The only way to confront this is to meet it head on, by rejecting any idea that foreign men — or Muslims — are more prone to sexual offences than their British counterparts. The logic of the argument is racist — it relies on the assumption that just because they are migrants, or asylum seekers, or not white (and with no other supportive evidence), they must be more prone to sexual violence than the men who already live here.
And the simplest, one-line refutation of it is to look at the men who were arrested for offences in the various race riots that followed events at Southport last year. Of those men, a staggering 40% have been reported to the police for domestic violence. There is, in other words, probably no single group of people — not in Britain or anywhere else — who are more prone to violence against women than the people now standing outside the hotels denouncing refugees. (“Lessons from an asylum hotel counter-protest: calling our opponents ‘fascist’ doesn’t work,” The Guardian, 29th August 2025)
According to the non-local Jewish man David Renton, local White women in places enriched by “asylum seekers” are not acting on lived experience but on racist “assumptions” about non-White men. But he goes further: he is implicitly arguing that the lived experience of the White women must be that they are in more danger from the White men accompanying them on their protests. In other words, David Renton and his fellow anti-fascists know the women’s lived experience better than the women themselves do. That’s why Renton demands that we “[reject] any idea that foreign men — or Muslims — are more prone to sexual offences than their British counterparts.”
We’ve got to reject that notion because it’s based on repulsive racism against “foreign men” and “Muslims.” That’s according to David Renton in the staunchly anti-racist Guardian. Here’s something else from the staunchly anti-racist Guardian:
Poll ranks India the world’s most dangerous country for women
A survey of global experts puts Afghanistan and Syria in second and third place, with the US the only western nation in the top 10
India is the world’s most dangerous country for women due to the high risk of sexual violence and being forced into slave labour, according to a poll of global experts. Afghanistan and Syria ranked second and third in a Thomson Reuters Foundation survey of 548 experts on women’s issues, followed by Somalia and Saudi Arabia.
The only western nation in the top 10 was the US, which ranked joint third when respondents were asked where women were most at risk of sexual violence, harassment and being coerced into sex. The poll was a repeat of a survey in 2011, in which experts saw Afghanistan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Pakistan, India and Somalia as the most dangerous countries for women.
Experts said India moving to the top position showed not enough was being done to tackle the danger women faced, more than five years after the rape and murder of a student on a Delhi bus made violence against women a national priority. “India has shown utter disregard and disrespect for women … rape, marital rapes, sexual assault and harassment, female infanticide has gone unabated,” said Manjunath Gangadhara, an official at the Karnataka state government. “The (world’s) fastest growing economy and leader in space and technology is shamed for violence committed against women.”
Government data shows reported cases of crimes against women in India rose by 83% between 2007 and 2016, when there were four cases of rape reported every hour. The survey asked respondents which five of the 193 UN member states they thought were most dangerous for women and which country was worst in terms of healthcare, economic resources, cultural or traditional practices, sexual violence and harassment, non-sexual violence and human trafficking.
Respondents also ranked India the most dangerous country for women in terms of human trafficking, including sex and domestic slavery, and for customary practices such as forced marriage, stoning and female infanticide. India’s ministry of women and child development declined to comment. Afghanistan fared worst in four of the seven questions, with concerns over healthcare and conflict-related violence. (“Poll ranks India the world’s most dangerous country for women,” The Guardian, 28th June 2018)
The over-achieving non-White countries in that article — India, Syria, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia — have all supplied large numbers of migrants to Britain. And four of those non-White countries are majority-Muslim. But White-majority Britain itself isn’t one of the over-achievers when it comes to rape and other forms of violence against women. Nor does Britain regularly generate headlines like these in the Guardian:
∙ Third teenage girl is raped and burned alive in India in one week
∙ Rusted screws, metal spikes and plastic rubbish: the horrific sexual violence used against Tigray’s women
∙ Hundreds of women raped and burned to death after Goma prison set on fire
∙ Girls as young as nine gang-raped by paramilitaries in Sudan
∙ The living hell of young girls enslaved in Bangladesh’s brothels
∙ Raped and killed for being a lesbian: South Africa ignores ‘corrective’ attacks
∙ Activists call for state of emergency in Nigeria over gender-based violence
∙ Refugee women and children ‘beaten, raped and starved in Libyan hellholes’
∙ Mona Eltahawy: Egyptian women are sexually harassed at every level of society
So here’s a simple question: Do such articles in the Guardian show that “foreign men — or Muslims — are more prone to sexual offences than their British counterparts”?
Well, only in reality. And leftists believe that racist reality must always give way to anti-racist ideology. In any case, even if non-White men are “more prone to sexual offences” in their homelands, they immediately cease to be so when they’re resident on Western soil, which has special, supernatural qualities capable of transforming all non-Whites into fully authentic Westerners. Yes, leftists like David Renton also believe in “magic dirt,” as the leading hate-thinker Vox Day calls it. That’s why the male outsider Renton knows that local women are acting on racist “assumptions” when they object to the presence of vibrant-but-vulnerable men from countries which, according to “global experts” in the Guardian, perform so well in the competition to be crowned “world’s most dangerous country for women.”
Summarizing Semitic supremacism
Let’s sum up what we now know about the Jewish anti-fascist David Renton. He’s a Marxist materialist who believes in magic. He’s a fierce feminist who believes that White women should shut up and submit to sexual violence by non-White men. And he’s a dedicated defender of the working-class who believes that the White working-class must obey the diktats of an elite that hates them. How can we explain all these contradictions? I think there’s a big clue in the title of one of Renton’s many books. It’s called Labour’s Antisemitism Crisis: What the Left Got Wrong and How to Learn From It (2021).
What’s good for goyim is not good for Jews: Stone Toss on Jewish double standards
I think that, like his fellow Jewish anti-fascist Daniel Trilling, David Renton is interested only in defending what he sees as Jewish interests. He supports non-White migration because he thinks it’s good for Jews. And he was “one of the organisers” of the anti-fascist demonstration because he thinks pro-White activism is bad for Jews. I suggest that no other consideration truly matters to him. And certainly not the welfare of White women and girls. Those women and girls know from direct experience that “foreign men” and “Muslims” are indeed “more prone to sexual offences than their British [i.e., White] counterparts.” But so what? That’s the repulsive racism of reality. And Renton rejects reality because reality isn’t good for Jews.
