Harold Meyerson hates White America

/11 Comments/in /by

It is a cause of some celebration that Harold Meyerson has been dropped as a columnist from The Washington Post. Of course, it wasn’t because of his animosity toward White America — the reason given is that he wasn’t attracting readers. But perhaps the predominantly White WAPO readership tired of him because of a sense that people like Meyerson definitely do not have their interests at heart. Here’s a 2013 column that quotes some of Meyerson’s more egregious anti-White comments. Obviously, it’s a marker of Jewish power that a Jewish person can be so positive about the eclipse of White, Christian America in a very public venue and without any fear that there will be a backlash against him. 

Pat Buchanan asks “Does the South Belong in the  Union?” Like Buchanan, I have noticed a lot of liberal angst that the Supreme Court removed the requirement that any change in voting requirements be approved by the Justice Department. Buchanan points his pen at Harold Myerson, the White-hating columnist of The Washington Post.

Consider Wednesday’s offering by Washington Post columnist Harold Meyerson. The South, he writes, is the home of “so-called right-to-work laws” and hostility to the union shop, undergirded by “the virulent racism of the white Southern establishment,” a place where a “right-wing antipathy toward workers’ rights” is pandemic. …

Were a conservative to use the term “black” as a slur the way Meyerson spits out the word “white,” he would be finished at the Post. Meyerson’s summation:

“If the federal government wants to build a fence that keeps the United States safe from the danger of lower wages and poverty and their attendant ills — and the all-round fruitcakery of the right-wing white South — it should build that fence from Norfolk to Dallas. There is nothing wrong with a fence as long as you put it in the right place.”

Read more

A Breakthrough Year

/57 Comments/in , /by

2015 will go down in the history of the American Racial Right as a banner year: we finally began making good on the advice Alex Kurtagic articulated so well for our movement in his 2011 NPI speech, “Masters of the Universe.” His core message was that status, power and emotion matter more to our success or failure than do facts and reason.

Sure, much of the breakthrough this year has been due to Donald Trump, a man and a force that is implicitly White, not explicitly so. However, it’s vital to understand that very positive signs were developing in 2014 and early 2015 from within our movement, well before Trump’s campaign announcement this June. And even in regard to Trump, to quote a commenter at Chateau Heartiste, “Trump isn’t Trump. He’s Ron Paul too. The truth is trying to come out like a rat gnawing its way out of a snake that tried to eat it, gnawing its way to the light.”

In fact, though the discussion provokes controversy on our side, especially among our Old Guard, the increasing political radicalization of some Game websites like Chateau Heartiste was one of those signs of youthful optimism in the air back in 2014. This New Right intersection on sex-and-race has only begun to receive the extensive examination it deserves, but here I will just note that we are not a movement originating in slave morality, comforting the meek with notions that everyone’s sexual value and potential are equal. In any case, the most powerful message in Game is not fatalistic at all — rather, it’s that any man can improve himself and his relationships by using Game to become less meek. In the recent past, our movement has been absolutely desperate for confident men. To me, it’s a measure of how extreme that desperation became, how stuck we were in our own echo chamber, that spokesmen as radical as the Chateau proprietors are on race, and as inspiring as they are to our bolder young men, should be seen by many as tainted. Read more

Europa ad Rubiconem – Europe awake!

/43 Comments/in , /by

The images of terror which we saw after the heavy attacks in the French capital are absolutely shocking indeed – but the events that took place were not at all a surprise! Nor was it a surprise that in the aftermath of the attacks it was discovered that most of the terrorists were French and Belgian citizens – born and raised in Europe. The existence of a fifth column is – and has been for a long time – ignored by the ruthless kind of politicians who hold power in most European countries, with the notable exception of Hungary. One need not be a prophet to foresee other terrorist attacks which will be quite similar to those of Paris.

At the same time we are shocked by other images: images of hundreds and thousands of so called “refugees” pouring into Germany and into Europe as a whole. A large number of the illegal immigrants don’t even try to lie about why they are here and for how long they are willing to stay: forever! Who would have predicted the terrific speed all this is happening with ten years ago – who would have even five years ago? Everywhere in Germany the indigenous population is peu à peu being replaced by people from the Middle East and Africa right now; everywhere in Germany? Yes, everywhere! That Western German cities such as Bochum, Mannheim, Cologne or Pforzheim had already been half lost to the unarmed invaders called immigrants. It was all obvious for any person not walking blindfolded through the streets. But now we are doomed to witness the conquering and sacking of regions which are so far still mostly populated with Germans: Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern just to name three. Our elites don’t even want us to have reservations in which we can preserve our cultural and biological heritage in peace and security! Read more

Der sehr große (giiigantische) Vorteil eines Sieges des Front National für den Kulturkampf in Frankreich

/2 Comments/in /by

German translation of “The Very Large (Yuuuge) Upside of a Front National Victory for the Cultural Struggle in France” by Guillaume Durocher

(The Occidental Observer December 11, 2015)

Übersetzt von Frederic Dupont

Die Dekadenz einer Nation zeigt sich in der Qualität Ihrer Führerschaft. Die Französische Republik gab uns einst, obwohl sie freimaurerisch und gottlos war, einen Clemenceau oder einen De Gaulle. Heute haben wir einen Francois Hollande, einen Mann,  der, bis hin zu seiner Wackelpudding-ähnlichen Statur Unentschlossenheit und Unvermögen vermittelt (so viel wie Jeb Bush). So endest Du, wenn Du nie eine Chance ergreifst, nie Staub aufwirbelst, nie deine Persönlichkeit durchsetzt – nichts davon auch nur ein einziges Mal. Doch Hollande ist nur die Spitze des Eisberges. Kommen Sie und begleiten Sie mich beim Gang durch die unterhöhlten Korridore der „französischen“ Regierung.

Im Allgemeinen fällt mir auf, daß der Besitz und die Kontrolle über die Medien in Frankreich weniger jüdisch dominiert ist, als in den USA. Natürlich gehört dem Waffenproduzenten Serge Dassault (geborener Bloch) die führende konservative Zeitung Le Figaro, Edouard de Rothschild rettete die angeblich „links-libertäre“ Libération und Bernard-Henri Lévy präsidiert über dem Französisch-Deutschen Kulturkanal Arte (wahrscheinlich nicht ganz zufällig – Arte ist wegen des Sendens von hochgradig degenerierten und sogar pornographischen Inhalten in den vergangenen Jahren bekannt geworden). (1) Die Juden sind natürlich prozentual weit überproportional Journalisten und auch „Intellektuelle im öffentlichen Raum“ (in Frankeich anmaßend „Philosophen“ genannt). Die Juden, welche – wenn überhaupt – nur 1 Prozent der französischen Bevölkerung ausmachen, sind wahrscheinlich nahe an einer absoluten Mehrheit unter den in der mediengeförderten Öffentlichkeit befindlichen Intellektuellen (Schauen Sie sich nur eine französische Talk-Show an), es ist jedoch schwer, belastbare Daten über diese Art Dinge zu bekommen. Read more

Pourquoi tant de haine et de peur de Donald Trump chez certains Juifs ?

/in /by

Original article: Why so much Jewish fear and loathing of Donald Trump?

Article d’origine publié le 29 octobre 2015

Traduction: Blog Blanche Europe

Chez certains Juifs, on constate une angoisse extraordinaire, à la limite du dérangement mental, à propos de la campagne de Donald Trump pour obtenir l’investiture du Parti Républicain. Cette angoisse ne se base sur rien de réel, mais trahit malheureusement leur profonde névrose et leur aliénation vis-à-vis de la nation américaine historique.

Il n’est pas inutile de se demander en quoi Trump diffère du candidat présidentiel idéalement souhaité par les Juifs en général. Ce candidat idéal est (1) systématiquement et fanatiquement pro-Israël ; (2) il est systématiquement à gauche sur les questions sociales, en particulier sur tout ce qui concerne l’immigration et le multiculturalisme ; (3) il dépend pour sa campagne électorale de grosses contributions financières qui dépendent de son empressement à satisfaire les points (1) et (2). Jeb Bush, qui était initialement le favori de Sheldon Adelson et de la Coalition Juive Républicaine, correspondait bien aux critères. Mais il semble maintenant perdre du terrain, alors qu’Adelson se rapproche de Marco Rubio—le même Marco Rubio qui tient exactement le bon discours sur Israël et le Proche Orient, et qui faisait partie de la bande des huit sénateurs derrière le projet de loi de régularisation et d’accélération de l’immigration. Read more

The Assault on Gender and the Family: Jewish Sexology and the Legacy of the Frankfurt School, Part Two

/61 Comments/in , /by
Albert Moll

Albert Moll

Part I.

Albert Moll (1862–1939), who would go on to be “a great influence on Freud,”[1] came from a Polish Jewish merchant family and “belonged to the Jewish religious community.”[2] Typical of his ethno-religious group, Moll frequently utilized his position within the field of medical psychology to form an oppositional bloc against prevailing opinions in nineteenth- and early twentieth-century non-Jewish society. Indeed, large numbers of Jews tactically ambushed several medical disciplines during this period for precisely this reason. Historian Elena Macini writes that “Jews flooded medicine at this time not only for social standing, but also in an era that witnessed the efflorescence of race science, for the opportunity of self-representation. … The presence of Jews in the medical sector in general, and in race science in particular, allowed them to assert Jewish equality and very often moral superiority.”[3] With Berlin as the center of German medicine, and Jews comprising one third of doctors in the city,[4] the domination and re-orientation of entire disciplines was not only feasible but disturbingly easy.

A key aspect of advocating for Jewish equality and moral superiority was the Jewish advocacy of social, racial and religious pluralism. This position often came into conflict with non-Jewish efforts to promote Nationalism, particularly ethnically-based Nationalism, and corresponding efforts to confront social and cultural decay. A universal theme in Albert Moll’s works were arguments against German attempts to reckon with late Imperial and Weimar-era social and biological degeneration via eugenic programs. For example, in his Handbuch der Sexualwissenschaften (1911) Moll expressed the hope that mooted plans for sterilization programs would “not be implemented and that our race-improvers do not get too much influence on our legislation.” When German science in the late 1920s became concerned with degeneration and decline, gravitating even further towards eugenics, Moll preceded Boas in rejecting the findings of behavior genetics, arguing that “the fact we find so many valuable people, despite the hereditary burden, is caused by regeneration in countless cases. …  We can hardly ever say something about the condition of offspring with any certainty at all.” Moll was therefore the quintessential Jewish physician: political and ethnic interests were never far from his dubious practice of medicine. Read more

Cultural Bolsheviks in the Media Manipulate the English Language: Comment on “How America’s dying white supremacist movement is seizing on Donald Trump’s appeal”

/16 Comments/in , /by

Editor’s note: Dr. Tom Sunic sent this letter in reply to “How America’s dying white supremacist movement is seizing on Donald Trump’s appeal” by Peter Holley and Sarah Larimer which appeared in The Washington Post on Dec. 21. One might comment on the wishful thinking apparent in the title (by all accounts we are growing) and its use of the SPLC’s favorite label, “White supremacist,” as a sure-fire to get the juices flowing in its target audience. But the point of the article is once again to link its real target, Donald Trump, with White advocates, thereby associating Trump with ideas that are abhorrent to the ruling class, the Washington Post readership, and Social Justice Warriors everywhere. The comments attributed to me were taken from the TOO annual fundraising note.

Dear Mr. Holley dear Ms. Larimer,

Let me congratulate you on your relatively well written piece on “white supremacists and Donald Trump’s appeal.” At least the quotes by some of my colleagues and friends (Richard Spencer, Dr. Kevin MacDonald, etc.) seem to be embedded in a dispassionate and larger framework of your description of would-be or real Donald Trump supporters.  It would be commendable, indeed, if yourself, or other Washington Post correspondents, could provide an additional piece on lexical manipulation and semantic derivatives of such grandstanding words and expression as “white supremacists,” “racists,” or “white nationalists.” What is the true meaning of these words today?  In fact, these expressions, so common by now in the US, are hardly ever used in the mainstream media in the EU.  Not for freedom of speech sake — far from it — but simply due to their cumbersome, polysyllabic character which does not allow them to be substituted into the standard version of the French or German translations. The expressions “white supremacists,” or “white nationalists,” sound pretty odd in France or Germany — notwithstanding the draconian, repressive, freedom-curbing laws in these two countries respectively.  This may be a good enough reason why Trump is likable to many people, including many self-censored academics and journalists in the USA and EU who, at long last, found a big man voicing aloud their suppressed political feelings.

Aside from being or not being enamored with Trump, it would be commendable to avoid using generic and highly loaded words such as “racists,” and “white supremacists.”  They have become meaningless by now, precisely because of their all too frequent usage.  They all bear striking similarities to the shut-up words  “fascists,”  “anti-Semites”,  “enemies of the people,”  which made up a standard vernacular in the former communist  Eastern Europe. As a young boy in ex-communist Yugoslavia, each time after attending Sunday school I was reprimanded by my teachers of my “deviant,” “clero-fascist,” “Ustashi ” behavior.  Subsequently, those denominations lost their original meaning — only to become a badge of honor for many nationalists in Croatia and Europe today.

Of course, I’d be happy to provide you with a comparative study of communist vs. liberal verbal treasure trove, and how a number of law-abiding White intellectuals and politicians in the USA and EU are being relegated to the realm of demonology. Demons, of course, being no humans, cannot have human rights.

Sincerely,

Tomislav (Tom) Sunic, PhD
www.tomsunic.com
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/author/tomsunic/
http://american3rdposition.com/?cat=1019

Zagreb, Croatia