There is a peculiar species of power broker that Washington has always nurtured but rarely named. He does not appear on the Sunday programs. He does not issue statements. He surfaces, briefly and reluctantly, before Senate committees, and then retreats once more behind the institutions that shelter him. Stephen Andrew Feinberg belongs to this species. He is, in the language of his own trade, a distressed asset turned strategic acquisition, a man who built his reputation on acquiring broken things and extracting maximum value before the walls came down.

He was born in the Bronx in 1960, the son of a steel salesman. When he was eight the family relocated to Spring Valley, a suburb north of the city, where young Feinberg distinguished himself not on athletic fields but across chessboards and tennis courts, ranking nationally in the former while competing fiercely in the latter. He arrived at Princeton and studied politics, producing a 94-page senior thesis titled “The Politics of Prostitution and Drug Legalization,” a topic that suggested a mind drawn to contested economies and irregular markets. He captained the tennis team, briefly joined the Reserve Officers’ Training Corps (ROTC) before departing it, and graduated in 1982 with a degree and very few illusions. His net worth today is approximately $5 billion.

Feinberg did not drift into finance so much as locate its pressure points immediately. After a stint at the now defunct Drexel Burnham Lambert, where junk bonds and legal exposure arrived in equal measure, he moved to Gruntal and Company and then, at 32, made his decisive move. In 1992, with a partner named William Richter and $10 million in seed capital, he founded Cerberus Capital Management. The name was chosen deliberately. In Greek mythology, Cerberus guards the entrance to the underworld, permitting entry but refusing exit. The metaphor, for those paying attention, was not accidental.

What Cerberus became over the following three decades was something the financial press struggled to classify. It was a private equity firm, yes, but one with an unusual appetite for distressed and politically sensitive assets. It acquired National and Alamo rental car, Albertson’s grocery chain, Air Canada, a controlling stake in Chrysler, and GMAC, the financing arm of General Motors. It hired former Vice President Dan Quayle as a chairman in 1999 and former Treasury Secretary John Snow in 2006. It trained soldiers through its military contracting subsidiaries and financed hospitals through its health care acquisitions. By 2024, it managed somewhere between $60 and $70 billion in assets.

Feinberg himself remained almost entirely invisible throughout. In 2007, he reportedly addressed Cerberus shareholders with a warning that has since become something of a founding legend in private equity circles: “If anyone at Cerberus has his picture in the paper and a picture of his apartment, we will do more than fire that person. We will kill him. The jail sentence will be worth it.”

A Career in Acquiring Broken Things

The Cerberus ledger assembles a portrait its founder has spent decades trying to keep out of frame. On December 14, 2012, 20-year-old Adam Lanza used a Bushmaster XM15-E2S semi-automatic rifle to kill 20 children and 6 educators at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. The weapon was manufactured by a Cerberus subsidiary. Four days later, Cerberus announced it would divest. It never found a buyer. Some investment banks refused to help with the sale. In the eleven months following the massacre, sales of the Bushmaster rifle surged as politicians debated restrictions on firearms, and Freedom Group posted $94 million in profits compared to just $500,000 during the same period the previous year. Cerberus profited. The company eventually filed for bankruptcy in 2018, burdened by nearly $1 billion in debt that its private equity owners had loaded onto it.

The pattern repeated itself with Steward Health Care. Cerberus purchased a Massachusetts hospital chain in 2010, extracted more than $800 million in profits over the following decade, including a $484 million dividend in 2016 financed by the sale-leaseback of hospital real estate to Medical Properties Trust, and then exited in 2020. What remained was a 31-hospital system saddled with $9 billion in liabilities owed to more than 100,000 creditors. Steward filed for bankruptcy in May 2024. Investigators later documented supply shortages, bat infestations, a patient death attributable to a repossessed medical device, and thousands of unsafe staffing violations.

Tier 1 Group, a Cerberus subsidiary, trained four members of the Saudi royal security detail that would go on to murder Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in October 2018. The training, conducted under a State Department-approved license from 2014 through at least December 2017, included marksmanship, surveillance, and close-quarters combat. The four men trained by Tier 1 were among a seven-person team drawn from the Rapid Intervention Force, an elite unit that answers exclusively to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. Cerberus’s DynCorp subsidiary, owned from 2010 to 2020, paid a combined $22.5 million to settle two separate Department of Justice fraud actions — $1.5 million over kickbacks paid by Iraqi subcontractors in connection with a Baghdad property lease, and $21 million over inflated subcontractor billing under a State Department contract to train Iraqi police forces.

The Epstein Ledger

Among the documents released by the Department of Justice in the Jeffrey Epstein files, Feinberg’s name appears in at least 20 entries. Cerberus Capital Management appears in approximately 360. According to NBC News, the business documents spanning 2009 to 2018 involve Cerberus and include Feinberg’s name, with some linked to Deutsche Bank, an institution known to have maintained financial dealings with Epstein during the same period. The Project on Government Oversight reported that emails in the Epstein files suggest Epstein maintained an active business relationship with Cerberus Capital Management. The precise character of that relationship has not been established. At a February 2026 congressional hearing, Representative Becca Balint asked Attorney General Pam Bondi whether the Department of Justice had questioned Feinberg about his connections to Epstein. Bondi declined to answer. Cerberus and the Pentagon have declined to comment as well.

The Ascent

Feinberg’s formal entry into Republican political life came with the 2016 election cycle. He served on Trump’s Economic Advisory Council, donated nearly $1.5 million to pro-Trump political action committees, and co-hosted a $50,000-per-person fundraising dinner for Trump and the Republican National Committee. In 2017, Trump tasked him with conducting a review of U.S. intelligence agencies. From 2018 to 2021, he served as Chairman of the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board, a position that placed him at the intersection of Wall Street and the classified world without requiring Senate confirmation or public testimony. In December 2024, Trump nominated him as Deputy Secretary of Defense. In March 2025, the Senate confirmed him 59 to 40. He was sworn in as the 36th Deputy Secretary of Defense shortly thereafter and assumed oversight of day-to-day Pentagon operations.

The Hearing and the Hawk

Feinberg’s Senate confirmation hearing in February 2025 produced the only extended record of his public policy views. What emerged was the portrait of a man who had thought carefully about American power and concluded that it was insufficient.

On China, he was unequivocal: “While the United States has all types of threats today, from North Korea to Russia to Iran, by far our biggest threat and most challenging is China. China is the first nation we have ever competed with that has both a great economy and a great military.” He went further, depicting Chinese industrial capacity as a military instrument without parallel: “China’s entire private sector is fully committed in supporting that military development, and as such, they effectively have unlimited funding.”

Iran: The Primary Theater

On Iran, Feinberg’s written advance policy questions to the Senate Armed Services Committee were considerably more forthcoming. He identified five core U.S. national security interests in the Middle East: counterterrorism, the free flow of trade, enabling regional partners and allies, preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, and ensuring the defense of Israel. The ordering is worth noting. Iran’s nuclear program and Israel’s security appear together as the fourth and fifth priorities in a list of five.

His threat assessment of Iran was stark:

“Iran poses a significant threat to the security of the United States and its Allies and partners. Last year, Iran launched two major missile and drone strikes against Israel from Iranian territory. In addition to Iran’s conventional military, Tehran also leverages proxy forces to launch kinetic attacks and advance their interests across the Middle East.”

On the nuclear question specifically, he wrote:

“Iran also continues to inch closer to gaining a nuclear weapons capability, which is unacceptable. Iranian acquisition of a nuclear weapon would threaten U.S. interests and partner security, provide Iran a shield behind which they could engage in more aggressive proxy activities, and increase the risk of nuclear accidents or miscalculation.”

He pledged to support Trump’s maximum pressure approach fully, describing his role as ensuring the Pentagon stood ready to present the president with military options while simultaneously supporting economic pressure and diplomacy. He also called for increased cooperation with regional and European partners in countering what he termed the Iranian Threat Network, and specifically flagged the significance of Russia’s strategic partnership with Iran as a compounding regional concern.

Golden Dome, Cerberus, and the Self-Dealing Question

Feinberg now oversees the Golden Dome for America missile defense initiative, a $175 billion program modeled on Israel’s Iron Dome system, involving space-based interceptors, ground-based radar arrays, and potentially directed energy technologies. At his confirmation hearing, he described the program with barely restrained urgency: “I adamantly believe that forcing national security systems to vacate these bands would be detrimental to national security. It would degrade our missile defense capabilities when we should be aggressively pursuing an Iron [Dome]…”

A March 2026 ProPublica investigation found that at least four companies awarded contracts for Golden Dome are owned by Cerberus: North Wind, Stratolaunch, Red River Technology, and NetCentrics Corp. Feinberg pledged to divest his holdings upon taking office, but his ethics agreement permits him to continue contracting with Cerberus indefinitely for accounting, tax, and health care services. Ethics experts described the arrangement as an ongoing and structural conflict of interest. Former White House ethics lawyer Richard Painter said Feinberg’s relationship with Cerberus “creates at least a perception of a conflict of interest that could undermine confidence in the fairness of the contracting process.”

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) further raised concerns that Cerberus holds approximately 14 percent of the debt and 24 percent of the preferred stock in Ligado Networks, a firm currently suing the U.S. government for $39 billion. As Deputy Secretary, Feinberg could influence the Department of Defense’s legal posture in that suit. The Pentagon has not addressed the concern formally.

The Operator in Wartime

On February 28, 2026, the United States launched Operation Epic Fury, a military campaign against Iran’s nuclear and missile infrastructure, conducted alongside Israel’s Operation Roaring Lion. Feinberg sits in the chain of command as Deputy Secretary. According to the Wall Street Journal, he held weekly operational calls related to Pentagon logistics as the Iran campaign began drawing down American munitions stockpiles, while the White House moved to press defense contractors to accelerate production.

He has not spoken publicly about the campaign. Public statements have come from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Undersecretary Elbridge Colby. Feinberg, true to form, has remained silent. His firm, meanwhile, produces the weapons.

The arrangement is singular in its audacity: a man whose financial empire has been stained by state-sponsored violence, institutional collapse, and proximity to notorious trafficking networks now occupies the second-highest office in the Department of Defense amidst a widening war with Iran. This paradox is not a malfunction of the system; it is its design. Washington has long depended on Jewish figures like Feinberg—architects of capital who treat state power as another distressed asset to be liquidated for strategic gain.

Yet the current act in this political saga reveals a deeper, more calculated reality. Feinberg serves as the Hidden Hebraic Hand guiding Secretary Pete Hegseth, who functions as the expendable front goy for an uncompromising “Israel First” agenda. Should this conflict falter, the political fallout will be contained to Hegseth, the designated fall guy. Feinberg, meanwhile, remains secure in his position, shielded by his Jewish privilege. This pattern illustrates the inevitable catastrophe of a leadership class that abandons its national mandate to facilitate the designs of a Jewish power bloc whose loyalties and goals are diametrically opposed to the welfare of the American citizenry.

Let me begin by pointing out a few of the most common misconceptions and the truth that they miss:

• The Myth: Jews are the genetic and spiritual descendants of the Old Testament Hebrews/Israelites. The Truth: Neither the Jews’s religion nor their DNA traces cleanly back to the OT Israelites, but rather to the Phoenicians/Carthaginians, who were those Israelites’ spiritual and civilizational enemies.
• The Myth: Christianity teaches that Jews are God’s chosen people. The Truth: Christ, the genetic descendant of the old Hebrews (tracing line lineage back to David, Abraham, etc.) fulfilled OT messianic prophesy and ushered in the New Covenant, negating the Old under which the Hebrews were chosen by God to fulfill a limited role; if the genetic descendants of the Hebrews no longer retain their chosen status, those masquerading as them certainly don’t.
• The Myth: Christianity has long been a means of making Whites subservient to Jews. The Truth: the kind of cucking Christianity that we are now plagued with was only born in the 19th century as a Christian heresy and only really took off in the 20th; it was the secular Enlightenment’s race-neutral and antireligious principles that allowed Jews to go from a group of co-elites (whom the native elites would kick out once the pressure from their peoples became too great) to the overall de facto rulers of our time.

With that as a summary, let me get into the history of Hebrews, Christians, and Jews. First, let’s talk about the spiritual lineage of the Jews, which traces back to ancient Babylon. In the Old Testament we read that sometime after Solomon died, the monarchy ceased being unified and split between the Kingdom of Israel in the north and the Kingdom of Judah in the south. The north was destroyed by the powerful Assyrian Empire and its Hebrews scattered, their fate unknown (the Ten Lost Tribes). The southern kingdom lasted longer but was ultimately conquered by the even more powerful Babylonian Empire which conquered the old Assyrian Empire and large swaths of the Middle East.

Both empires had a policy of large-scale population transfers, based on the logic that if you are plopped down far from your homeland and among other, disparate peoples you are that much less likely to revolt (similar logic compels our tyrannical elites to import disparate peoples, making us strangers in a familiar land, as it were). The intellectual and skilled labor classes were often taken to Babylon itself to serve the empires’ elites. It was there that spiritual corruption entered the picture.

In Babylon, the Hebrew elites discovered pagan mysticism and a religion in which the priestly and prophetic classes were mouthpieces for the state and its ruling classes, in contrast to the way things tended to go in the Hebrew kingdoms, where prophets were likely as not to be killed by mobs and kings for chastising wicked rulers and commoners and demanding that they return to God’s ways. In Babylon they found priests who manipulated their ostensible gods’ words, prophesies, and edicts for their own (and their rulers’) ends—and the more corrupt among them loved what they saw. When they returned, those now-corrupted Hebrew elites began manipulating—in proto-Talmudic form—God’s word, replacing His laws with their own. This became the Tradition of the Elders, which Christ rebuked the scribes and Pharisees for following instead of God in Mark 7:1-8. That was one major source of spiritual corruption that would form the strain that became Talmudic Judaism; but there was another, one directly tied to the Jews’ true genetic lineage. To know that we must focus on a time between the Babylonian Exile and Christ’s time.

By the time of the Punic Wars between Rome and Carthage—which at its climax saw the city of Carthage destroyed in 146 BC—the latter had amassed a mighty (mostly seaborne) empire which spanned the Mediterranean. But in terms of their roots, they traced back to the Phoenician cities of Tyre and Sidon just north of Israel. Genetically and historically, those Phoenicians/Carthaginians are the descendants of the Canaanites that the Hebrews displaced and drove north. We hear in Judges 3:1-4 that the Canaanites were not fully annihilated but permitted to survive so that they could serve to test future Israelites in battle (not only militarily but spiritually, as we’ll later see). So by the time of their wars with Rome, there were about four million of those pagan, child-sacrificing Canaanites living in various cities and settlements around the Mediterranean. When Rome destroyed their empire, their old religion took a hard hit—during the siege of Carthage, they sacrificed hundreds of elite children to Baal but he still didn’t save them (go figure!)—and they were ripe for conversion.

In Matthew 23:15 we hear Christ say of the Pharisees: “Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when you have succeeded, you make them twice as much a child of hell as you are.” It seems the already corrupted Hebrews followed the sea trade routes, making converts of the Carthaginians, their Semitic cousins, who were so devastated by their utter defeat by Rome that they were ready to hear their backwater cousins’ prophesies about a coming messiah who would make their nation great again. How we know this happened: as H. G. Wells and later Ron Unz (inspired by Wells) point out,[i] the point in the historical records at which the Phoenicians suddenly and mysteriously disappear is the very same at which we see large populations of Jews in the cities around the Mediterranean where the Phoenicians had been!

But why “twice as much a child of hell”? Well, because it seems that although the Carthaginians knew their old gods had failed them, they weren’t ready to abandon them entirely, even after conversion. Thus the religion that would evolve into Talmudic Judaism was essentially a corruption of a corruption. This is why during the Crusades, Jews fearing that the Christians were going to try to convert them and their children not only killed their children, but called on their god to accept their blood as a sacrifice to destroy the Christians: an atavistic reversion to the child sacrifice of their pagan days. Or why the Kabbalah tells how the chant “The Lord is one!” is not monotheistic but refers to the sexual union of a male and female deity: the Carthaginians had a chief god (Baal) and goddess (Tanit—equivalent to Ishtar), whose sexual union had cosmic significance.[ii]

So spiritually, not only are those we know as Jews following a corruption of an already corrupted Hebrew religion, but beyond that, what is essentially an anti-Christian religion and has been from its beginnings. The Greek Septuagint version of the Old Testament is the oldest full version of the OT that we have and is used for biblical scholarship since the true original—which was written in Paleo-Hebrew (which uses a script that looks nothing like the Hebrew most know)—is long lost, and the Masoretic Hebrew text was intentionally corrupted by the Talmudic Jews to make it appear that Christ wasn’t the messiah. Jews scorn the OT, with one of their most beloved Rabbis of any age Shimon ben Yohai writing: “He who occupies himself with Scripture [the Old Testament] gains merit that is no merit. . . . He who occupies himself with Mishnah gains merit for which there is a reward. . . . He who occupies himself with Talmud—there is no source of greater merit than this.”[iii] The Rabbis themselves even admit in the Mishnah that their holiest Talmud has only the most tenuous connection to the Old Testament: “The [Talmudic] laws concerning the Sabbath, Festal-offerings and acts of trespass are as mountains hanging by a hair, for they have scant Scriptural basis but many laws.”[iv]

What does the Talmud itself say about Christ?[v] Oh not much . . . beyond his having been a sorcerer who is now boiling in his own excrement for all eternity for trying to lead the Jewish people astray—well, that and his mother Mary was a whore. Their attitudes toward Christians follow directly from this. As the humanist Jew (who seems to have been a genuinely honest and well-meaning man: he wrote against Israel’s brutal treatment of non-Jews long before such things were well known, Israel Shahak shows in Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, religious Jews are literally commanded to oppose Christians in every way:[vi]

• While “the murder of a Jew is a capital offense . . . Jewish religious courts and secular authorities are commanded to punish, even beyond the limits of the ordinary administration of justice, anyone guilty of murdering a Jew.” However, “A Jew who murders a Gentile is guilty only of what talmudic Law calls a sin against the ‘laws of Heaven,’ to be punished by God rather than by man. . . . To cause indirectly the death of a Gentile is no sin at all.”
• ”Since even the minimal interdiction against murdering a Gentile outright applies only to ‘Gentiles with whom we [the Jews] are not at war,’ various rabbinical commentators in the past drew the logical conclusion that in wartime all Gentiles belonging to a hostile population may, or even should be killed.” In  other words, they should be Gazaed.
• “Sexual intercourse between a married Jewish woman and any man other than her husband is a capital offense for both parties, and one of the three most heinous sins. The status of Gentile women is very different. The Halakhah presumes Gentiles to be utterly promiscuous and the verse ‘whose flesh is as the flesh of asses, and whose issue [of semen] is like the issue of horses’ is applied to them. Whether a Gentile woman is married or not makes no difference, since as far as Jews are concerned the very concept of matrimony does not apply to Gentiles (‘There is no matrimony for a heathen’). Therefore, the concept of adultery also does not apply to the intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman; rather, the Talmud equates such intercourse to the sin of bestiality.”
• “This does not imply that sexual intercourse between a Jewish man and a Gentile woman is permitted—quite the contrary. But the main punishment is inflicted on the Gentile woman; she must be executed, even if she was raped by the Jew.” (Explains Epstein’s ilk rather well, huh?)
• “According to the Halakhah, Jews must not (if they can help it) allow a Gentile to be appointed to any position of authority, however small, over Jews.”
• “The Talmud bluntly forbids giving a gift to a Gentile.”

And on and on and on like that.

For well over a thousand years, Jewish communities strongly practiced endogamy (breeding within your race or tribe) even as they lived in the lands of others, and kicked out any who did not conform to their wicked religion (Spinoza[vii] being an example: the Jews wanted to murder him for blasphemy; he was saved only by Christian authorities’ refusal to hand him over). Thus for that long they selectively bred for extreme ethnocentrism and a morality that was bifurcated: one set of moral rules for the in-group, another for the out-group. This is why they scream when you criticize them for killing and raping Palestinians: what we call hypocrisy is their morality—and has been since its being codified in the Babylonian Talmud.

As far as the actual term “Jew” goes, it comes from the Greek term (transliterated) Ioudaios, which in the Bible can mean two very different things. First, it can refer to Judahites—those belonging to the tribe of Judah—and their lineage. They were part of the southern kingdom, the one whose peoples did not disappear into the mists of time, as happened to the members of the northern tribes following the destruction of the Kingdom of Israel at the hands of the Assyrian Empire. Christ is of the line of Judah, that being the reason He uses the phrase intentionally mistranslated as “Salvation is of the Jews,” (John 4:22) which actually reads, “Salvation is of the line of Judah,” i.e., Christ. The ones we refer to as “Jews” are not of any Hebrew line, being Phoenicians. The reason we call them “Jews” is that the second meaning of Ioudaios is one from Judea, a Roman province in Christ’s time: that could mean anyone, regardless of ethnicity—it’s analogous to the term New Yorker, and it is true that many of those converted Carthaginians lived in Jerusalem and Judea at large in Christ’s time—hence they were “Jews” in that sense. Huge trouble has been caused by translating both those from Judea and Judahites as “Jews.”

For most of Christian history there was constant tension if not bloodshed between Christians and Phoenician-derived Jews (with the latter initiating more often than not). Early on these Jews used the pagan emperor Julian the Apostate to try to punish Christians and attempt to rebuild their Temple as a rebuke to Christ—which ended with them giving up after fires kept springing from the ground (that according to the pagan sources, who would have been inclined to use a nonsupernatural explanation if there had been one). When all of Rome became Christian these Jews then began to hate and try to subvert it as well. These Jews readily aided the Persian invasion of the Levant in 614 AD and ransomed captured Christian soldiers for the sole purpose of slaughtering them in the Massacre of Mamilla Pool.[viii]

In the Dark and Middle Ages, the Jews’s power was indirect as they worked with corrupt Christian elites, offering them loans and becoming tax farmers for them—while milking the commoners in every way possible. They became what you might call co-parasites, helping the native elites screw over the population at large. Take the example of England: The Jewish loan sharks granted usurous loans to the minor nobles, accepting their lands as collateral, and then passing the lands of those who defaulted onto the king in lieu of taxes; the king then got to increase his lands without taking them directly. In Eastern Europe they had a monopoly on the alcohol industries (distilleries and taverns) in the rural areas. In the parts of France that bordered Muslim Spain they had a pure monopoly on kidnapping Christian children, castrating them and then selling them as eunuchs across the border (the original Epsteins?). In all areas they had a virtual monopoly on tax farming and usury.

Back then, if their greed and harm to the population got too great, out they went, since unlike now there was no uniparty to keep shifting the blame among, only a king and his Jewish coconspirators: and that former knew that if he didn’t pin the blame on and exile the latter, he’d get blamed and suffer a revolt at best and overthrow (since the Jews were hosing minor nobles as well as peasants) at worst. Back then, the church, while not hostile to Jews for racial reasons, was not about to defend those who rejected Christ if they did too much harm to ordinary Christians. Often it was the king who wanted to defend the Jews and common church officials who wanted to defend the peasantry. The church was especially keen on maintaining the laws that kept Jews from becoming full citizens and prevented their abuses and power from going too far.

It was the Enlightenment that fundamentally altered the dynamic: with its belief in the tabula rasa (blank slate) view of human nature, its secularism and hatred of organized religion in all its parts (unfortunately, the good as well as the bad), and its civic nationalist ideas that uprooted the old laws and allowed the Jews to become full citizens—at which point they started virtually monopolizing the newspapers, taking control of the banking system, bribing government officials, etc. Democracy gave them the opportunity to pay off both sides and keep accumulating their power by using whichever party happened to be in power at the time. They blackmailed Woodrow Wilson with letters to his mistress into making Louis Brandeis a Supreme Court justice, and did something similar to Kennedy to make him take LBJ as his running mate. They used kompromat on the cross-dressing FBI director J. Edgar Hoover to keep the feds from opposing organized crime (which they dominated much more than the Italians). This kind of power would have been unthinkable in the pre-secular age.

The cucking that wasn’t a result of the Enlightenment’s secularism/blank slate ideas was mostly the result of two non-Jews and one Jewish financier. The original godfather of “Christian Zionism” was the dispensationalist John Nelson Darby. Darby appears to have been a Freemason (and possibly Satanist) masquerading as a Christian and making strange, subtle, and often evil alterations to the Bible via translation (e.g., he has Peter address Christ the way only demons do[ix]). He came up with the strange notion of dispensationalism, which has variations but most share these aspects:[x]

• Earthly time (from Adam to the new heavens and new earth) is divided into seven unequal periods of “dispensations,” during which God changes the way He deals with and judges humanity.
• Despite Christ’s admonition in John 14:6 that “No one comes to the father except through me,” Jews have a separate means of salvation despite having crucified and continuing to reject Him.
• The good are raptured to heaven before the seven-year tribulation begins and then return with the Lord seven years later, having skipped all the misery, death, etc. (Yes, this is the part that has otherwise good nominal Christians sitting on their lazy asses or cheering on evil times rather than trying with everything they’ve got to oppose those bringing about those times.)
• In Christ’s triumphant return He will preside over not all the nations as a universal messiah, but “a restored Jewish monarchy,” under which Gentiles will be “lesser human beings.”

Why would anyone other than Jews believe this tripe? Well, the non-Jewish man who originated it was allegedly a Satanist?

But how did it manage to spread as far as it did?

Well, although Darby planted the seeds of our current, genocidal Jews-worshiping madness, it only massively grew thanks to the Jewish Wall Street financier Samuel Untermyer who found a crooked goy conman and general scumbag named Cyrus Scofield—he was in and out of jail for various scams and even abandoned his first wife and kids—and apparently convinced him to use his fake preacher credentials to put his name on a 100% kosher Bible[xi] which offered Zionist-friendly commentary on every page along with the holy text (most real Christian intellectuals who did write commentaries thought it both tacky and semi-blasphemous to put their words so close to God’s). Untermyer and the other Jewish elites got it published by Oxford University Press (Jew-owned) and paid for its widespread distribution around the time of the Balfour Declaration and the beginning of the massive Jewish immigration to Palestine.

The post WWII cucking has much more to do with the churches not wanting to lose their tax-exempt status, Jewish media domination (they controlled all of the major networks and many of the radio stations), and their strategic use of the phony Holocaust legacy than Christian doctrine.

Beyond that, even earlier, around the beginning of the 20th century, communists in general and Jews in particular had made an effort to infiltrate the seminaries in the U.S. to subvert the Christian religion. This was concerted, intentional subversion, not by misguided do-gooders but by the open enemies of Christianity.

And as far as Catholics go, while in 1904 Pope Pius X may have told Theodor Herzl and the other Zionists where to shove it when they tried to get him to back their project to take over Palestine—a decision that made them more determined to make use of Protestants (hence, why Scofield and his phony Bible became even more important)—by the time of WWII the Vatican was cooperating with the OSS (precursor to the CIA) and there was enough internal rot to allow the Jews to rewrite salvation history via Vatican II, which added Catholics to the ranks of the Jews’s cucks: once seen as self-blinded fools who crucified Christ and continue to reject Him, the Jews now became “elder brothers in the faith,” which as I’ve shown earlier is dead wrong for a number of reasons. Vatican II was a textbook case of Jews pulling strings (albeit far less openly than Netanyahu does now): as Lawrence Erickson puts it, “Cardinal Bea, John XXIII’s choice for preparing the new Jewish documents, appears to have mostly outsourced this job to a leading Rabbi of the American Jewish Committee.”[xii] Again, this was the result of power translating into (heretical) doctrine rather than doctrine leading to power, with the power in question being that of the WWII triumvirate of the American deep state, organized crime (by that time dominated not by Italians but by Jews such as Meyer Lansky), and America’s economic oligarchs (who were both heavily Jewish and sporting deep state connections—e.g., General Electric, which had very strong CIA ties).

The cancer of elite world Jewry and their corrupt White coconspirators has continued to metastasize to this day, which is why we now have tens of trillions of debt, crumbling infrastructure, a military that spends 13 billion on ships with toilets that don’t work, etc., yet nobody gets sacked and prosecuted—while Jews enjoy the highest income per capita in the nation and we are forced to go to war for the puny, genocidal state of Israel. Nothing even remotely like this happened in the age when Europe was Christendom; rather, it happened when men abandoned their (always weak and often failing) devotion to Christ as their king and made idols out of “equality,” “Holocaustianity,” money (offshoring, anyone?), etc., and it became forbidden to notice, let alone punish, Jewry’s collective sins. As that misquote of Chesterton goes, when men cease believing in God they do not believe nothing, they believe anything. Transubstantiation might seem farfetched, but it’s got nothing in that regard on the modern sacrament of transgenderism—another mostly Jewish project, as Scott Howard has shown (somewhat unintentionally) in his book The Transgender-Industrial Complex.

Humans have to have faith in something. If not God, it will be something entirely stupid, even insane. The logic of atheism is anathema to long-term (that is, beyond one generation) planning, since no one will live that long and there are no consequences for saying “I’m taking what I can while I can—let someone else pick up the bill.” Rather, we should be pushing for a reformed Christianity dedicated to smashing all false idols (including ideologies such as negrolatry, Jew-worship, etc.) and demanding all earthly things be subjected to the acid test of reason; one that has people making sure their children and grandchildren have a country to grow up in that isn’t hostile to them.

---

[i]Unz, Ron. “American Pravda: Prof. John Beaty and the True Origin of the Jews.” The Unz Review, Ron Unz, 29 Jan. 2024, www.unz.com/runz/prof-john-beaty-and-the-true-origin-of-the-jews/.

[ii]Shahak, Israel. “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.” If Americans Knew: What Every American Needs to Know About Israel-Palestine, Professor Israel Shahak, 2002, ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/shahak.html?v=202602172144.

[iii]Hoffman, Michael. “What Does Rabbinic Judaism Say About What Makes Jews and Gentiles Different? The Unz Review.” The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection, Ron Unz, 21 Sept. 2020, www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/.

[iv]Hoffman, Michael. “What Does Rabbinic Judaism Say About What Makes Jews and Gentiles Different? The Unz Review.” The Unz Review: An Alternative Media Selection, Ron Unz, 21 Sept. 2020, www.unz.com/article/what-does-rabbinic-judaism-say-about-what-makes-jews-and-gentiles-different/.

[v]Shahak, Israel. “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.” If Americans Knew: What Every American Needs to Know About Israel-Palestine, Professor Israel Shahak, 2002, ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/shahak.html?v=202602172144.

[vi]Shahak, Israel. “Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years.” If Americans Knew: What Every American Needs to Know About Israel-Palestine, Professor Israel Shahak, 2002, ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/shahak.html?v=202602172144.

[vii]Joyce, Andrew. “Pariah to Messiah: The Engineered Apotheosis of Baruch Spinoza, Part 1 of 3.” The Occidental Observer, 5 June 2019, www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2019/05/05/pariah-to-messiah-the-engineered-apotheosis-of-baruch-spinoza-part-1-of-3/.

[viii]“Mamilla Pool.” Wikipedia, Wikimedia Foundation, 4 Sept. 2025, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamilla_Pool.

[ix]“John Nelson Darby Version: Doctrinal Changes to the Holy Bible.” Liberty to the Captives, libertytothecaptives.net/darby_doctrinal_changes.html.

[x]“The Folly of Dispensationalism.” The Biblical Worldview Ministries, web.archive.org/web/20190731004215/www.thebiblicalworldview.org:80/folly-of-dispensationalism.

[xi]Perloff, James. “The War on Christianity, Part II: The Abomination and Blasphemy of Christian Zionism.” James Perloff, 31 Aug. 2016, jamesperloff.net/war-on-christianity-part-2/.

[xii]Erickson, Lawrence. “The Smoke of the Synagogue.” The Unz Review, Ron Unz, 20 Mar. 2024, www.unz.com/article/the-smoke-of-the-synagogue/.

 

As we head into the meat of the 2026 midterm election season, things are looking dicey for the Republicans. The news is grim: Trump’s approval rating is at a low point of 36%; among the youth, ages 18–29, it is between 25% and 29%; and “A Third of GOP Voters May Sit Out” if Republicans abandon their usual pro-life policies.  And all this before Iran.

The Israel-Palestine conflict is of notable concern for the GOP.  While they are only 2 percentage points “under water” on this issue among all voters—49% disapprove versus 47% approve—they are in severe trouble with the youth.  It was recently reported that only 29% of American youth side with Israel, and even among Republicans, 41% are more sympathetic to the Palestinian side.

Even Christian fundamentalists are turning against Trump.  Even if they are implicit (or explicit) Christian Zionists, most of them are still, at the same time, “America Firsters.”  It is possible to be both, and yet still put America ahead of Israel or Jewish interests generally—something like “America First, Israel Second.”  This is possible for many.  But not for Trump.  One recent commentator remarked that “the most destructive flaw that has spoiled Trump’s image with his [fundamentalist] base is his unconditional support of Israel’s war on the Palestinian people.”  This slaughter of Gazans, and the simultaneous assault on many Christians and Christian churches, has been ongoing for more than two years now.  Trump’s base “has rightly recognized that Trump is not ‘America First’ but ‘Israel First’.”

And now, of course, with the new war on Iran, what was clear to many is now clear to all:  Trump is an utter stooge, a tool of the Jews and Israelis, and is willing to kill any number of Muslims or Americans to further Jewish/Israeli interests.  This lunatic action against Iran is highly unpopular all across the American political spectrum; in a new poll, just 27% of Americans approved of the attack.  As fuel prices rise and the American death toll creeps upward, we can expect that low level of support to fall even lower.

I would also add here, as an aside, that this criminal action against Iran has wide support in Israel itself.  Despite the many internal disagreements and the broad dislike of Netanyahu, Israeli Jews are almost united in the unprovoked bombing campaign.  A recent headline in the Guardian stated that Israel is “embracing militarism” and that Netanyahu’s war “has few critics” there.  The attack, they add, “was greeted with broad and enthusiastic support…including [Netanyahu’s] bitter rivals.”  Nearly all Israeli Jews, it seems, are happy to unleash an unprecedented assault on a neighboring nation and to kill off its top leadership.  I have yet to see surveys of American Jews, but I would presume a similar widespread acceptance.  So, to those faint-hearted critics who fear blaming “all Jews” for Israel’s murderous belligerence, well, I think we can dismiss such worries from now on.  Yes, my friends, it is, more or less “all Jews” who support these criminal actions; consequently, “all Jews” will have to pay a price.

Worse than Trump being a Jewish stooge is the fact that virtually the entire Congress is beholden to Jewish interests.  We have long known that Republicans get around 25% of all campaign funding from Jewish sources, and Democrats around 50%.  This ensures that Democrats will offer only the meekest of resistance to Trump’s blatantly illegal and monstrously unethical attack on Iran.  They will do nothing of substance because, in the end, their Jewish sponsors like this war, and in fact have been pushing for it for years.  Any Congressman who speaks too harshly against Trump’s crimes against humanity will surely lose his Jewish financial support and face a stiff, well-funded opponent in the next primary.  US Congress: bought, sold, and paid for by the Jewish Lobby.  How’s that working, America?

An Obvious Solution

Trump’s popularity, such as it was, came from those who liked his professed policies:  America First, closed borders, tough on crime (especially immigrant crime), fiscal restraint, ending DEI and absurd politically-correct policies, getting tough with NATO, ending foreign entanglements, and, especially, “no new wars.”  In reality, we got a few tidbits on some of these, but mostly we got dumped on.  We got war on Venezuela, war on Palestine, war on Iran, ongoing proxy war against Russia, and economic war against the whole world.  We got ballooning government spending and concomitant debt: a $1.5 trillion defense budget, and a $2 trillion annual budget deficit, pushing total government debt to $38 trillion.  But hey, the Jews are happy, and that’s all that matters.

If we continue on this track, Republicans will likely get crushed in the midterm elections, when all 435 House seats and 35 Senate seats are on the ballot.  Even with the radical Republican redistricting, if GOP voters are unhappy or unenthusiastic and simply sit it out, Democrats will make substantial gains.  They will spin this victory as a repudiation of all of Trump’s policies, even the good ones, and they will therefore push for a return to “the good ol’ days” of Obama and Biden.  But that would be bad news on multiple fronts.

So, what to do?

All this begs an obvious solution: “MAGA without the Jew.”  In other words, why can’t we have candidates who support all the good things Trumps stood for, without the suicidal attachment to Israel and the Jewish Lobby?  Why can’t we have a Republican candidate—not Black, not Muslim, not Jewish, just White—who endorses (a) strong borders, (b) tough on illegal immigrants, (c) an end to DEI, (d) fiscal conservatism, (e) ending all ongoing wars, and generally, (f) America First?  And that’s it!  Isn’t that good enough to win a crushing victory?

This new movement—call it MAGAWJ—would also take an open and explicit stance: no Jewish campaign funding, no aid to Israel, no wars for the Jews.  After all, perhaps 2% of the American population are Jews, so we clearly have no democratic need to bow down to them, especially when the interests of the other 98% run in the opposite direction.

A good MAGAWJ candidate would continue Trump’s policy on closed borders and would accelerate the removal of illegals.  Simple and obvious actions like (1) strictly enforcing laws against hiring illegals, and (2) making it a serious crime to house an illegal, would have an immediate effect.  Just these two actions would drive thousands of illegals out of the country without having to arrest and detain them.

Our ideal candidate would implement a plan to close down most of America’s 800 or so foreign bases while, at the same time, slashing the military budget in half.  Yes, in half.  Even then, we would still be spending 50% more than the world number two, China.  We would still have the world’s top military, by far.  But we could save $500 billion dollars per year while simultaneously making it much harder for any future presidential tyrant to try to rule the world.

In the present political climate, MAGAWJ is a recipe for certain victory.  The typical Trump voters would jump on board without hesitation, and a large share of independents would happily vote for it.  Even many nominal Democrats, those who consider themselves liberal but are tired of working on behalf of Jewish interests—especially young voters—would switch their votes.  It would be a Republican landslide; it would set the stage for long-term Republican success, long-term national success, and long-term world peace (if we care about that).

MAGAWJ candidates:  We are waiting for you!

Thomas Dalton, PhD, has authored or edited several books and articles on politics, history, and the Jewish Question. All his works are available at www.clemensandblair.com, and at his personal website www.thomasdaltonphd.com.