Lying to ourselves is more deeply ingrained than lying to others.
Fyodor Dostoevsky

As famous Russian mathematician Igor Shafarevich points out in his essay on the Jewish question, Jews like to take credit for just about everything when in fact, they have observably invented or contributed very little throughout modern history and were only able to do what they did using the tools that were handed to them by the host cultures in which they found themselves:

I would like to draw attention to the fact that the Jews are active and often useful in their activities, but they are only able, so to speak, “to work on an already plowed field.” For example, Mendelssohn, Mahler, and Berg were undoubtedly talented musicians. But they were able to express themselves only when Western music was created—by Gabrielli, Schutz, Bach, Haydn, etc. Or, in Russia, Jews were very active in recent centuries (we will not discuss the difficult question of whether it was for good or to the detriment of the natives), but in any case, this became possible only after the country was plowed up and the Russian state was created.[1]

Most of their great men, such as Karl Marx,[2] Sigmund Freud,[3] Franz Boas,[4] Albert Einstein,[5] and Stephen Jay Gould[6] turn out as failures or notorious frauds or plagiarists.[7] And as far as their alleged inventions are concerned, most of them are not theirs to claim. According to academic writer and scholar Karl Radl, the editor and owner of Karl’s substack. Everything about Jews and Judaism, “Jews have a nasty habit of claiming that they created/invented things when they in fact didn’t and then never correcting the claim so that it becomes common place and ‘accepted as fact.’” Here is a partial list of the things they falsely claim to have invented: Nuclear-powered submarine, Wi-Fi, the Weekend, scale electric model train, Prozac, Aciclovir (antiviral drug), instant camera, fax machine, rubber condom, tapered roller bearing, stainless steel, incandescent light bulbs, laser, refrigerated railroad cars, video games, cafeteria, barbie, seven-day week, homeopathy, Scotch guard, helicopter, instant coffee, blue jeans, kidney dialysis and the artificial kidney dialysis machine, walkie-talkie, lipstick, pacemaker, electric motor, colour television, flashlight/torch, biochemistry, operetta, modern orthopedic surgery, Frequency-hopping spread spectrum technology, the bra, chemotherapy, drip irrigation, vitamin C, automobile/car, the term cardiac countershock, stainless steel, microbiology and bacteriology, streptomycin, interferometer, nuclear powered submarines, sewing machines, the high-vacuum electron tube, discount store, geosynchronous satellite, mercury battery, optical fiber cable, hologram, 6-mercaptopurine (leukemia treatment), portable synthesizer, etc.[8]

What about their achievement lists? Can they be trusted? No, says Karl Radl, “Jewish achievement lists” can hardly be held to be valid given that they don’t represent anything other than a rhetorical ploy on the part of the Jews to — as before stated — prove the contention that Jewish persecution has been brought about by so self-congratulatory a reason as simple jealousy about the supposed ‘superiority of the jews’ when compared to the gentiles. […] Thus, we can see that the ‘Jewish achievement lists’ are simply meaningless.[9]

Does this include the disproportionate number of Jewish Nobel prize winners? You couldn’t bluff that. The Nobel prize is a serious affair. They gave one to Bob Dylan, didn’t they? Well, according to the Swedish scientist, Jan C. Biro, Md., Ph.D., this has more to do with Jewish marketing and networking skills than with merit:

Alfred Nobel’s Will (the founding document of the prestigious Nobel Prize) requests “…that in awarding the prizes no consideration be given to the nationality of the candidates, but that the most worthy shall receive the prize …” This expressed wish is largely ignored by the Nobel Foundation, who award excessive numbers of Prizes to Jewish scientists (who traditionally belong to “One Nation” even if they live in different countries around the World), thus creating the large Jewish-Bias (J-bias). They award the Prize 137 times more frequently to Jewish candidates worldwide, and 26 times more frequently to those in America than would be expected from the size of the Jewish population. The proportion of Jewish laureates more than doubled (2.3-fold increase) after the Second World War owing to the explosion of prizes shared between Jews and Gentiles (8.8-fold increase). Higher IQs and preferential choice of science as a profession among Jews do not fully explain this J-bias. It is more likely that extensive and well-organized personal networking of a marketing type among Jewish scientists, together with the egalitarian-liberal, nonchalant attitude of the Swedish representatives of the donor, are responsible for this unfortunate phenomenon. It is suggested that the World’s scientific community persuade the Nobel Foundation to follow the rules of Nobel’s Will in accordance with Swedish Law. [10]

Simply put, as explained in an excellent article by blogger “Academic Agent” called “The Myth of High Jewish IQ”:

Nobel Prizes are not a neutral institution; they are not selected in an open manner, but tightly controlled through a committee. They demonstrate nothing beyond what power selects. The claim that prizes from this body is an objective measure of anything, therefore, must be discarded.”^[11]

But aren’t the Jews in Israel smarter than most people? It takes brains to transform a desert into an oasis, right? Yes, it does, and there are indeed very smart people in Israel who belong to the Ashkenazim section of the population (average IQ 111), but they are now a minority at 35% because of the lower-IQ middle eastern, Sephardic, and the ever-increasing orthodox and ultra-orthodox sections of the population. According to a study by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, the average IQ of Jews in Israel is now 95.[12]  So, if brains did contribute to the prosperity of Israel, it was not the only factor. Money and outside help had a decisive impact on the development of the country. As Lenni Brenner says, the Jewish author of the book Zionism in the Age of Dictators, without Hitler’s help, in the thirties, it is highly likely that Israel would not exist.[13] And without massive financial and technical help from the White American and White German taxpayers, the Jewish cuckoo that laid its hegemonic ambitions in the nest of the Palestinians could not survive for very long.

How can that be? Most people think that Jews are really smart and that Jewish doctors are the best in the world. In fact, Jews who think of themselves as God’s preferred people believe they are superior in everything they do because of that.[14] Charles Murray, for example, the famous co-author of The Bell Curve. Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, in an article called “Jewish genius in 2007” attributes Jewish superior intelligence to the “happy irrefutable” fact that Jews are “God’s chosen people.” Is this why they are admitted in such high numbers to the best schools of the country?

“No,” says Ron Unz, the Jewish owner and editor in chief of one of America’s most influential conservative websites, The Unz Review, “given the poor performance of Jewish students on admissions tests, it is totally absurd and ridiculous that they are admitted in such large numbers to America’s elite universities. […] They are apparently admitted at a rate 1000% higher than equally intellectually deserving white students.”[15] How is this possible, with White students outnumbering them by 30-40 to 1?

It seems according to Ron Unz that Jews have lost the drive that characterized early immigrant generations and are now much more average. Their admission is no longer explained by brains alone. Nepotism has nothing to do with it, but “it’s not entirely clear,” writes Ron Unz, “and I don’t think it is,”[16] even though most of the deans of these venerable institutions are Jewish, as are a disproportionate number of administrators and faculty members. Unz leans more towards pressure from the American media, which is all Jewish-controlled. Thus, at the slightest drop in Jewish enrollment, the tribal watchdogs are quick to cry “antisemitism,” resulting in a subsequent increase in Jewish students. Admission officers, who are poorly paid and susceptible to bribery by the wealthy parents of Jewish applicants, are also believed to be responsible for this systematic bias. But according to Ron Unz, most of this favouritism is due to the Holocaust. It would be enough for Jewish applicants to play the card of the grandmother gassed in Auschwitz to be admitted, to the great displeasure of White students, who view this unbearable anti-White racism with much disgust but are forbidden to fight back publicly on pain of being branded as antisemites.[17]

That being said, let’s not forget the fact that beginning in the twenties, there were quotas on Jewish admissions to the universities. The cream of the cream—the high IQ Ashkenazim—that was admitted went on to play a significant role in the upward mobility of Jews in Western societies. The more average Jews could not get into Ivy League schools because they just weren’t smart enough as reflected by their poor performance on the SAT tests. That all changed, when in the early fifties, a clever Jew from Brooklyn named Stanley Kaplan found a way to subvert the system. It was a rather simple scheme. After each class that graduated from his test-prep school, Kaplan invited to a party every student that took the test on the condition that he would tell Kaplan one question he remembered from taking the test. By the time he sold his business in the 70s, he could tell his students with increasing accuracy, the answers to most of the questions on the test. As a result, Jewish scores on the SATS skyrocketed, as did Jewish admissions to the best schools of the country.[18]

Ironically, the type of people that the test was supposed to exclude because they were not intelligent enough, “ended up using the test to take over America’s elite universities. Once that happened, it was only a matter of time before they took over American culture as well, something that occurred in the mid-‘70s, just as opposition to the SATs was reaching a fever pitch,” notes journalist Sean Tite.[19]  And “Once a sufficient number of Jews became professors at the Ivy League schools,” asserts J. Tite, “they started showing extreme preference for other Jews in the hiring and admissions processes — to the point that the ‘elite’ schools today have become not much more than Jewish Shivas.”[20] Fortunately, the scheme that allowed Jews to cheat the system was ended in 1977 when David Halperin, a Jewish senator from Brooklyn, who had himself cheated the system, introduced the truth-in-testing bill which made the SAT questions public. In doing so, no one after that could use that scheme to cheat the system.[21]

The above cheating schemes raise a number of questions: Is nepotism at Harvard more important than Ron Unz thinks? If it was so common during the Kaplan years, why would it be different today? Do the Jews who now occupy leading positions in our universities, media, government, and institutions deserve to be there on merit or because of ethnic nepotism? In the end, are their fake celebrities, their fake invention claims, their fake achievement lists, their fake Noble Prize numbers, their fake antisemite accusations, and their holocaust victimization weaponized to legitimate and facilitate their domination over Western countries? Would control of the money and the media on top of it, be the perfect recipe for their success? Is this “group evolutionary survival strategy,” as Kevin MacDonald would put it, what allowed them to prevail, up until now, over more gifted and meritorious races? Did the Jewish race in general find in the Mossad’s motto, “By way of deception thou shall do war,” a biological niche that allowed them to succeed?

The Great Destroyers

According to Jewish author Maurice Samuels, Jews are unusually good at destroying and building back nearer to their heart’s desire, as the Fabians would say[22]:

We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build.[23]

You can see in Gaza, live, 24/7, on most social media, how Jews like to destroy and rebuild back nearer to their heart’s desire. They seem to have a strong predisposition for absolute destruction of their enemies—starvation, violence, cruelty, phosphorus bombs, and murder of children, women, and the elderly. The scale of civilian suffering and the images and videos coming from Gaza are devastating.

Just ask the Russians. Many of them remember well what the Jewish-led Bolsheviks did to them during the Red Terror. They murdered, starved, tortured to death, and sent to the gulags, to die a slow death, every individual that stopped them from building back nearer to their heart’s desire. Thirty million dead is their legacy just in Russia.[24]^{, [25],} It’s more like a 100 million if you count the number of casualties of communism in general. [26]

That’s what they did in Germany also. They were not the only ones involved, but Churchill’s mentor, Professor Fredrick Lindemann[27] and his Jewish colleagues, Professors Solly Zuckerman and Desmond Bernal played a significant role in the design and planning of the wartime carpet bombing of German cities that was advocated to break the spirit of the population.[28] Hundreds of thousands of civilians, women, children, and the elderly, were burned alive by incendiary phosphorus bombs.[29] Dresden first comes to mind, but hundreds of cities and villages were destroyed in that matter. The infrastructure of the country was destroyed, overpopulated concentration camps full of refugees fleeing the Soviets in the East, were no longer supplied with food, water, and medicines, inmates died by the thousands from hunger and disease. When the allies liberated these camps, they found piles of emaciated cadavers all over the place, but it’s questionable whether they were killed by the Germans as the allies were quick to claim for propaganda reasons; many were killed indirectly by the accusers themselves.

The atomic bomb itself, the destroyer of all destroyers, was mostly a Jewish invention.[30] It was in fact called the ‘Jewish bomb.” Jacob Beser, the individual who detonated both of the atom bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki, at an altitude that was calculated to cause the greatest possible destruction, was Jewish. Although this bombing was most likely unnecessary to win the war as Japan was ready to surrender, Beser never expressed any regret of having probably killed for nothing roughly 200 000 thousand civilians. In fact, his only regret is that he could not do the same thing to Germany.[31]

Only one conclusion is possible: Jews were the greatest criminals of the 20^th century. A fact vindicated by Ron Unz, the Jewish editor in chief and owner of one of America’s leading conservative websites, The Unz Review:

[…] per capita, Jews were the greatest mass murderers of the 20th century. And by a huge margin, with no other nationality even remotely close. And yet, through the astonishing alchemy of Hollywood, the greatest killers of the last hundred years have been magically transformed into the greatest victims, a transformation so seemingly implausible that future generations will surely be left speechless.[32]

Cultural Marxism

But there’s more than one way of destroying to rebuild back nearer to the heart’s desire. Besides the bombs, the tortures, the famines, and the gulags, Jews devised more subtle ways to destroy what they don’t like. The following is a short reminder for those who are not familiar with this subject and for those who lost track of its methods and implications.

When the Jews realized that the Communist Revolution they were advocating in order to achieve world governance was not igniting the Western proletariat as expected, they devised an alternative plan that was milder, but much more effective in its subtlety. The plan which has many similarities with the controversial Protocols of the Elders of Zion was to destroy Western society from within.[33] Here are some of their goals and the means to achieve them:

– Penalize racism by Whites in order to promote Third-World immigration and race mixing;

– Provoke continual change in order to create confusion and to keep children from developing a strong sense of values or a feeling of historical continuity;

– Promote pornography, transgenderism, and teach children about sex and homosexuality at a very young age in order to destroy the traditional model of family and marriage;

– Undermine the authority of schools and teachers in order to promote a laissez-faire culture;

– Promote mass immigration and miscegenation in order to destroy racial and ethnic identity;

– Promote excessive alcohol and drug use to dumb people down and prevent them from asserting their rights and defending themselves;

– Empty the churches, without morals and spirituality, people are defenseless;

– Institute a justice system biased in favour of the criminals to the detriment of the victims in order to demoralize the population and create confusion;

– Create dependency on social benefits to prevent dissent;

– Control and dumb down the media and journalists for propaganda purposes;

– Encourage the breakdown of the family by promoting feminism, contraception, divorce on demand, abortion, “furry babies,” among other things.

In his book The Dispossessed Majority, American racialist Wilmot Robertson brilliantly describes the disastrous effect of this wholesale cultural destruction on the American white majority.[34]

Frankfurt School

One of the main objectives of the Jewish Frankfurt School was to exploit Sigmund Freud’s Jewish doctrine of pansexualism,[35] according to which every act could be explained by an unconscious sexual motivation. Prominent authors such as William Reich, Herbert Marcuse, and Theodore W. Adorno were convinced that antisemitism is a symptom of sexual frustration that can be cured by liberating the Gentile’s libido. To that effect, they advocated the pursuit of pleasure, unfettered enjoyment, the exploitation of gender differences, the reversal of traditional gender relations, and especially feminism.[36]

Why is feminism so important? A Jewish-dominated liberal democracy cannot happen without feminism, a movement that was largely pioneered, influenced, and led by Jewish women.[37] Feminism removes family structures and traditions, and creates individualistic populations that are easy to manipulate and control. Without a strong family to support it, society loses its cohesion and capacity to resist and fight back. This is why the CIA promotes feminism in Muslim countries.[38]

Here are some of the strategies they used:

– To undermine the authority of the father, reject the specific roles assigned to the father and the mother and wrest from parents their inalienable rights to the education of their children;

– Abolish the difference in education between girls and boys;

– Abolish all forms of male domination;

– Declare without justification that women are an oppressed class and men are oppressors.

One of the Frankfurt School’s most influential propagandists, Willi Münzenberg (not a Jew), summed up the long-term goal of this school of Globo-Zionist subversion as follows: “The West we are going to create will be corrupt to the point of stinking.”[39] Indeed, that’s exactly what happened. After WW2, Jews imbibed with cultural Marxist and Frankfurt School notions, flooded American and European universities, and were given “honorary degrees” in the 10s of thousands! This Frankfurt School invasion laid the seeds to the sex, drugs, and rock and roll revolution of the sixties which destroyed the traditional way of life of all Western countries. Right up until now, it had a considerable impact not only on the youth, but also on the general populations of all these countries. We only have to look around us to see the extent to which the Western White majority has been dispossessed and dragged through the mud.

In the end, instead of wanting to destroy the world to better suit their needs and demands, Jews should follow the advice of one of their most distinguished scholars, Harvard historian, Richard Pipes. He finishes his book, Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime, by asking: “does anyone have the right to remake human beings and refashion society without the mandate of the people and even against its will in the spirit of the early communist slogan, ‘we will drive mankind to happiness by force?’” Modern society concludes Professor Pipes, “is a complicated structure difficult to grasp, so one should never impose on it patterns of conduct. […] It is best to let people be. The tragic and sordid story of communism teaches that political authority must never be employed for ideological reasons.”[40]

---

[1] Igor Shafarevich, “Postscript to The Three-Thousand-Year-Old Enigma,” The Occidental Observer, October 11, 2022. See also Roll Slavisky, “The Elusive ‘Jewish Solution.’ Thoughts on Igor Shafarevich’s ’Postscript to ‘The Three-Thousand-Year-Old Enigma,’” The Unz Review, October 20, 2022.

[2] Chris Christensen, “Popper on Marx on History,” Philosophy Now, 2019.

[3] Michel Onfrey, Le crépuscule d’une idole. L’affabulation freudienne, Bernard Grasset, 2010.

[4] Sam Francis, “Franz Boas – Liberal Icon, Scientific Fraud,” Dare, October 14, 2002.

[5] Larry Romanoff, “A Few Historical Frauds. Einstein, Bell & Edison, Coca-Cola and the Wright Brothers,” The Unz Review, July 11, 2020.

[6] Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique. An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political movements, Kindle, 2021.

[7] Hervé Ryssen, Planetarian Hopes, Omnia Veritas Ltd, 2023.

[8] Do a search with “Jewish Invention Myths,” Karl’s Substack. Everything about Jews and Judaism.

[9] Karl Radl, “Why ‘Jewish Achievement’ Lists are Meaningless,” Karl’s Substack. Everything about Jews and Judaism, Dec 22 2023.

[10] Jan C. Biro Md., Ph.D, The Jewish Bias of the Nobel Prize

[11] Academic Agent, “The Myth of Jewish High IQ,” The Forbidden Texts, November 26, 2023.

[12] Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen, IQ and the Wealth of Nations, Praeger/Greenwood, 2002.

[13] Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of Dictators, Croom Helm Ltd, 2014.

[14] Laurent Guyénot, Our God is Your god too, but He has chosen us. Essays on Jewish Power, AFNIL, 2020.

[15] Ron Unz, “Racial Discrimination at Harvard,” The Unz Review, 2016.

[16] Ibid.

[17] Ibid.

[18] Nicholas Lemann, “Behind the SAT,” Newsweek, June 9, 1999, Vol. 134 Issue 10, p52, 6p, 1c, 4bw.

[19] Sean Tite, Jews Cheat to Infiltrate Academia via SAT Scam, March 6, 2017, archive.today

[20] Ibid.

[21] Ibid.

[22] Zygmund Dobbs, Keynes at Harvard. Economic Deception as a Political Credo, Veritas Foundation, 1960.

[23] Maurice Samuels, You Gentiles, Internet Archive, p. n.76.

[24] Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century, Princeton University Press, 2004.

[25] Alexandre Soljenitsyne, Deux siècles ensemble, 1795-1995, tome 1 : Juifs et Russes avant la révolution, Fayard, 2002 ; Deux siècles ensemble, 1917-1972, tome 2 : Juifs et Russes pendant la période soviétique, Fayard, 2003. An English translation can now be found on the web.

[26] Jacques Courtois et al, The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression, Harvard University Press, October 15, 1999.

[27] Although this issue is far from settled, if Lindemann was not Jewish by blood, as some Jewish influencers claim, he is undoubtedly a “synthetic” jew, or a Jew at heart, someone who espouses Jewish values and objectives like Donald Trump, Joe Biden, and most politicians in the US, who as soon as they are elected pledge allegiance to Israel. How else can Lindemann’s extreme hatred of Germans and Whites be explained?

[28] Frederick Lindemann, 1st Viscount Cherwell. Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia.

[29] Benton Bradberry, The Myth of Jewish Villainy, Money Tree Publishing, 2023, Second revised and augmented edition, p.385.

[30] The Secret Jewish History of the Atomic Bomb.

 [31] The Jew who Bombed both Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

[32] Ron Unz, “Racial Discrimination at Harvard,” The Unz Review, 2016.

[33] Benjamin Garland, , 2017.

[34] Wilmot Robertson, The Dispossessed Majority, H. Allen, 1981.

[35] Wikipedia. The Free Encyclopedia: Pansexuality is sexual, romantic, or emotional attraction towards people of all genders, or regardless of their sex or gender identity. Pansexual people might refer to themselves as gender-blind, asserting that gender and sex are not determining factors in their romantic or sexual attraction.

[36] Benjamin Garland, work cited.

[37] Ibid., “Part VII-Second Wave Feminism,” p. 56 to 69.

[38] Suzanne Thompson, Planting Seeds in Afghanistan, Economica. Women and the Global Economy, International Museum of Women.

[39] Willi Münzenberg, Spartacus Educational.

[40] Richard Pipes, Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime, Vintage Books, 1995, p. 512.

A patriot, according to customary definition, is someone who vigorously supports their nation and is prepared to defend it at all costs. A patriot is also someone who believes in the essential goodness or rightness of their country, particularly when it is at war. Americans are generally known to be a deeply patriotic people and a soft nationalism largely permeates much of the country. We’re inclined to think that our elected leaders in Washington, though perhaps flawed, are basically good folks who genuinely have the best interests of the people they represent.

This might be less so today because a growing number of Americans have started to realize just how corrupt our current government is, including of course the president and almost the entirety of Congress which is deeply influenced and controlled by the Israel Lobby, military contractor corporations, and other special interest groups.

I confess that I was once such a patriot. This was the sort of mindset I carried for many years. America, right or wrong, I was proud to call it my home and to defend its honor before its many detractors. I believed, for instance, that the North was on the right side of history when it sought to overthrow the South’s rebellion during the Civil War — a war justified because it supposedly sought to free negro slaves. I was persuaded that whatever reasons lie behind America’s entry into WW1, it was justified. The same may be said when I considered the events of WW2. I implicitly trusted America’s court historians to tell me the truth. The wars that came after, such as the Korean conflict, Vietnam, The Gulf War, and the ensuing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were all necessary and grounded in vital American interests (or so I thought).

When people questioned and challenged the official version of the events of 9-11, I dismissed them as kooks and conspiracists. I was certain that our government wouldn’t lie about something as obvious as the events of that early September morning in 2001. It wasn’t until years later that I realized how little I knew of America’s dark history, its persistent habit of creating conflicts and political coups throughout much of the world.

I was historically and politically naïve, to say the least. To arrive at where I am today has been a fascinating journey which I have neither the time nor space to explain in this brief article. Suffice it to say, decades earlier there were a plethora of reasons to seriously challenge one’s patriotic commitment to America, its foreign policies, its authoritarian statism, and the circus that Washington has morphed into which suffocates the life of anyone foolish enough to get caught within its web. The American people, then, have every right to distrust and to even despise their government. The government has given us every reason to do so.

Thus, at this time in history, there’s no excuse for not seeing clearly the rot of Washington and eschewing everything about it, including the 535 members that currently comprise Congress. The information is abundant and readily available if one is willing to search. In short, the federal government has proven to be the enemy of us all.

The level of betrayal and outright treason by both congressional Democrats and Republicans staggers the mind when one stops to consider what evils they have vomited on the American people. The following is only a small sampling of what our government has perpetrated on the world and its own citizens.

A $95 Billion Aid Package for Everyone But Americans

If hatred for Congress hadn’t gripped you years earlier, then the most recent events should certainly seal the deal as when Congress authorized 95 billion in war aid to Israel, Ukraine and Taiwan. All this while massive numbers of Americans are homeless and poverty-stricken, unable to afford their mortgages or medical insurance, including an infrastructure that is largely neglected and dilapidated. Mind you, this was after the U.S. had already given $107 billion worth of aid to Ukraine!

Additionally, “The U.S. government has purchased seeds and fertilizer for Ukrainian farmers. America is covering the salaries of Ukraine’s first responders, all 57,000 of them. The U.S. funds divers who clear unexploded ammunition from the country’s rivers to make them safe again for swimming and fishing” (‘In Ukraine, U.S. Tax Dollars are Funding More Than Just Military Aid,’ CBS News, by Aliza Chasan, 9/24/2023).

Does anyone really think that such astronomical taxpayer funds given to Ukraine (or any country for that matter) will receive the level of fiscal oversight it deserves? Congress has rejected oversight on Ukraine funding for years, and Ukraine has gained a well-deserved international reputation for being rife with corruption at its highest levels. Why, then, would any sane nation trust billions in taxpayer dollars to Ukraine knowing full-well the level of corruption that exists there? Whether this is a ginormous money-laundering scheme or something far more sinister, this is precisely what our Congress has chosen to do with little concern for what is best for the American people. How can we expect there to be any serious oversight and accountability in Ukraine when there is little of it here in the states?

According to an article in Responsible Statecraft, “The Pentagon failed its sixth audit in a row last month. And “failed” is putting it generously . . . But semantics aside, one major reason the Pentagon keeps failing its audits is because it can’t keep track of its property. Last year, the Pentagon couldn’t properly account for a whopping 61% of its 3.5 trillion in assets” (‘Pentagon Can’t Account for 63% of Nearly 4 Trillion in Assets,’ by Julia Gledhill, 12/4/2023).

The U.S. Complicit in the War Crimes of Israel

Congress has also given billions to support Israel’s war efforts against Hamas and the Palestinian people. Congressional Republicans are even pushing for military aid and monetary benefits for any American who possesses dual citizenship (Israeli/American) and is called to serve in the IDF. Our congressional traitors seem to have no qualms about such exorbitant spending sprees distributed on behalf of foreign nations rather than the people they were elected to serve. How is such excessive spending justified when the national debt registers at over $34 trillion?

And what ‘vital interests’ does the U.S. have in supporting Israel’s genocide against the Palestinians? Thousands of women and children have been killed as result of Israel’s bombing raids. In fact, according to a press release published by the United Nations Human Rights Commission, it was noted that “women, girls and children overall are among those most exposed to danger in this conflict, and that as of 29 April 2024, of 34,488 Palestinians killed in Gaza, 14,500 have been children and 9,500 women” (‘Onslaught of Violence Against Women and Children in Gaza Unacceptable: UN Experts,’ 5/6/2024).

Such atrocities and bloodshed committed against civilians by the Israeli government is not something widely supported by the American people. Yet both Democrats and Republicans have united to lend both moral support and huge sums of taxpayer funds to help Israel. Does any of this sound like a government that harkens to the will of its people? How many nations does our government have to internally disrupt and bomb before we realize what an evil and grotesque institution we have unleashed on the world?

“BRICS” and its Move Away from the American Dollar

The U.S. federal government has caused so much misery and ruin overseas, that an alliance has formed among a growing number of nations (“BRICS”) to move away from the U.S. dollar’s reserve currency status. The times have changed, and the nations of the world are fed up with America as a bully who goes about seeking to impose its “democracy” and degenerate western values on every country. They have tired of the persistent efforts of American neocons to uproot countries and erect puppet governments throughout the world that they can exploit. They have tired of the CIA’s long track record of destabilizing South American and Middle Eastern countries and in creating color revolutions that run counter to the will of the people. Does anyone think that the federal government’s efforts at causing unrest and conflict throughout much of the world will work out well for the average American citizen? There is no reason to think so.

Illegal Immigration

The U.S. federal government has for many decades turned a blind eye to illegal immigration. More often it has pretended to ‘get tough’ on those who have illegally crossed onto American soil while doing nothing to stamp it out permanently. Some presidential administrations, granted, have been more diligent in trying to secure the border than others. Yet the problem persists.

Now, under the Biden administration, not only are America’s borders wide open, but the federal government actively encourages and incentivizes millions of illegals to enter our country. Efforts to stop crossings at the Rio-Grande, including the use of barbed wired to keep out hordes of newly arrived immigrants has been opposed by the Biden administration, almost all of it favored by federal courts. Whether incentivized illegal immigration is for the purpose of replacing its majority demographic (Whites) or for mass recruitment into our military since a large percentage of the invaders are males of military age, there can be little doubt that none of it will fare well for our citizenry.

What kind of nation is this that allows millions of non-assimilable immigrants from Third-World countries to enter unchecked? How could this not have disastrous effects on our economy? Why should White Americans have to compete with illegal immigrants for the few remaining jobs available? How will any of this reduce the already existing racial troubles that America is known for? The Biden administration has concocted a recipe for the fall of America and the complete displacement of Whites within their own country.

The Government Has Turned Against its Founding Stock

The U.S. federal government has for many years supported the rising tide of anti-White sentiments and propaganda. It has given aid, taxpayer funds and various resources to groups and political organizations that stridently work to racially and culturally displace Whites as the majority demographic in the U.S. Aside from federal Affirmative Action policies which explicitly discriminates against Whites, the federal government promotes DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) which in a host of practical ways works against the White majority. It is meant to demoralize Whites, to villainize them, and to weaken any efforts at solidarity among them.

What kind of government is this that seeks to dispossess the founding stock of its own nation? I know of no other government in the world that works as fervently as the U.S. federal government to create hardships, policies that mandate reverse discrimination against Whites, and the eventual displacement of those whose ancestors created the nation. Is this the mark of a benevolent government seeking what is best for its people, or one that is deeply adversarial toward its founding stock? The answer should be obvious.

Americans Are Excessively Taxed

The U.S. federal government excessively taxes the American people. Everyone knows this, and yet Congress does nothing of substance to relieve this burden. Our nation’s tax code is so complicated and convoluted that it requires highly educated tax ‘experts’ to make sense of it all. Everything we own or possess is taxed, re-taxed, and then taxed again on both federal and state levels. We are, seemingly, allowed to make barely enough to stay economically afloat, and a growing number of Americans aren’t even able to do that. Almost everything has become unaffordable for the average American, particularly housing and food.

What kind of government is this that allows its own people to wallow in poverty and homelessness, especially when it possesses the resources needed to improve their condition? Does this sound like a government that places the welfare and health of its citizens as top priority?

The Government Complicit in the Covid Scam

During the Covid pandemic, the U.S. federal government worked tirelessly to make sure every American got the vaccine. As it turned out, those same vaccines caused enormous amounts of harm and medical complications (e.g., blood clots, myocarditis, immune suppression, and a plethora of vaccine injuries). Has the U.S. federal government ever apologized? Has it conceded its role in causing enormous harm to the American people? Has it sought to make amends in any meaningful way? Of course not, and I doubt it ever will. Perhaps the greatest deception ever foisted upon Americans was performed by our own federal government, and never forget that both Democrats and Republicans allowed it to occur.

The Government Seeks War with Russia

And now, our continually warmongering federal government is doing all in its power to instigate a war with Russia. We are literally on the precipice of WW3, and yet our congress does nothing to put a stop to it. Where are the voices of reason within our government? Where are all the anti-war peace activists that were seemingly everywhere during the Bush era? Apparently, they only take to the streets when it’s a republican president in the Oval Office.

What kind of government seeks a military conflict with another nation that is not only nuclear capable, but possesses even more nuclear warheads than we do? They may have their reasons for such aggression toward Russia (e.g., to salvage the American dollar, to retain American and Western hegemony, to obtain Russia’s vast resources, to secure forever the liberal international order of the West, etc.), but how can they not see that their efforts at poking the Bear will inevitably bring about the deaths of millions of Americans, including Russians?

To demonstrate just how fast events have escalated, the Biden administration recently gave authorization for Ukrainian forces to employ U.S. manufactured missiles against Russia’s interior. While it may be Ukrainian soldiers launching the missiles, Russia knows well that they have been provided to Ukraine by the U.S. When viewed in this light, it’s obviously no different than our own U.S. military directly launching them.

Is it any wonder why Russia speaks openly of the possibility of a nuclear exchange with NATO?  In a statement given to Reuters, Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Sergei Lavrov, said the following: “We do not rule out additional steps in the sphere of nuclear deterrence, because our command centers and the locations of our nuclear forces will be in range of American forward-based missiles” (5/30/2024).

I cannot think of any other time in our nation’s history where we have been this close to nuclear war, except perhaps during the Cuba missile crisis in October of 1962. Unlike our dementia-ridden president currently in office, both Nikita Khrushchev and John Kennedy were of sound mind and body and, thankfully, cooler heads prevailed at the time. Yet both houses of Congress refuse to step in and put an end to this insanity! Continuing in its warmongering trajectory, the U.S. and Britain recently bombed Sanaa, Yemen’s capital, in a retaliatory effort against the Houthis who have launched attacks at shipping vessels in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden.

Thus, while engaged in covert military operations in Ukraine against Russia that has brought us to the brink of WW3, the Biden administration is also engaged in warfare against Israel’s neighboring countries. In truth, neocons within the federal government for over twenty years have created so much destabilization and destruction within the Middle East that we now find ourselves at war with multiple countries.

A Military Draft Seems Inevitable

And because of it, the U.S. federal government is now considering the possibility of a military draft. The American people are largely war-fatigued after having to endure a host of seemingly endless wars beginning in 2001 when we waged war against Afghanistan and later when we invaded Iraq in 2003. Most young adults have little interest in fighting foreign wars in countries they couldn’t even begin to find on a map. The government’s solution, then, is not to ramp down its fiery rhetoric nor to cease its aggression toward Russia. Rather, it is to conscript huge numbers of American males and females for the upcoming meat grinder!

While the government and its complicit media currently denies any intention of creating a military draft, there is little doubt that conscription would be the only reasonable avenue for a warmongering government like ours. Our current all-voluntary force is barely able to meet its current obligations and challenges, and rather than reducing its operations throughout the world, we seem hell-bent on expanding them into every region. This will require a significantly greater number of trained troops. The wars we waged in Afghanistan and Iraq were largely fought against insurgents with limited arsenal and resources. This will not be the case if the U.S. were to find itself in a full-scale war against Russia, China or Iran.

In an article published in The Atlantic, military analysts Jason Dempsey and Gil Barndollar noted that a “major conflict would break” the voluntary military, and that such realities are “an open secret in defense circles” (‘The All-Voluntary Force is in Crisis,’ 7/3/2023). The government and media deny the inevitability of a military draft because it would alarm too many Americans. It would provoke a fury of public challenges as to why it was needed and whether such a war would even be necessary. It would create a panic, and many Americans would find creative ways to not comply. It seems more likely that our government will announce a draft after it has already committed itself to some kind of overseas conflict, and then use it to justify the draft.

The prevailing U.S. military philosophy for the past few decades has been to rely on high-tech war systems, precision strikes, and fewer troops. But having fewer troops will likely prove disadvantageous when fighting large-scaled armies that both the Chinese and Russian militaries possess. Thus, waging wars against countries that have technologies on par or close to us — especially if they have large standing armies, naval ships, and equivalent air power — would seem to require a draft if we intend on meeting such perceived threats.

Yet, when one considers how vile the federal government has been toward the American people for the past 60 or so years, including its many unnecessary wars which has only created chaos and destruction for much of the planet, why would any American seriously consider enlisting? Were the U.S. to find itself in a war with China, Russia or Iran, the number of returning body bags would be unprecedented! The scale of it would likely be greater than the deaths registered during WW2 due to the sheer power and accuracy of modern weapons. What sane parent would be willing to send their children to such a miserable death for a cause that makes little sense?

Consider also the character of those who serve as our elected officials in Washington. Do any of them even begin to inspire confidence and loyalty? Are these the caliber of people you’d be willing to sacrifice your children on behalf of? Do you seriously think any of them will send their children to the meat grinder?

Naturally, there are going to be patriot-types who possess little discernment and who haven’t learned a thing about America’s long history of warmongering who will gladly show up at the military recruitment center. The U.S. is filled with this kind and, unfortunately, the greater number of them come from among White Americans. Like a battered wife who keeps returning to the husband who constantly disrespects and beats her, so also young White males will eagerly sacrifice their lives for a government that despises them.

Whites who are considering joining the military might want to also consider what kind of military they are joining. This is not the military of your father’s or grandfather’s era, but a military marked by open acceptance of homosexuality and Transgenderism. Today’s military leadership is led by persons who are openly homosexual, lesbians, and men pretending to be women. While not every higher ranked military official may be this way, every enlisted person is expected to go along with it and to never oppose it in any fashion.

Every branch of the U.S. military is committed to DEI (diversity, equity, inclusion) which amounts to acceptance or ‘tolerance’ of any and every deviancy one can imagine. This is our military’s version of the rainbow flag. Recruitment has been so low that our armed forces have been compelled to lower its standards and, essentially, accept anyone no matter how odd or unacceptable they are to customary standards of military life. In a Department of Defense article, Bishop Garrison, the senior advisor to the Secretary of Defense for human capital and DEI, has said that “the need for diversity, equity, and inclusion to be a consideration or a part of all decisions in the military” (‘Diversity, Equity, Inclusion Are Necessities in U.S. Military,’ by Jim Garamone, U.S. Department of Defense, 2/9/2022).

Beginning in 1993, homosexuals in the U.S. military during the Clinton administration were urged to follow a policy of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” This officially ended in 2011, and now openly homosexual, bisexual and Transgender persons are not only allowed to join the military, but they are not barred or reprimanded for making known their sexual proclivities. If one cares to see just how in-your-face they are about it, YouTube and TikTok are filled with videos and ‘shorts’ featuring military personnel parading about in their drag regalia.

Any White heterosexual male seeking a career in the U.S. military, then, will have to endure every stripe of deviant, freak, and oddity known to society. This is the freak parade that the federal government has allowed its military to morph into, and which the American people have largely accepted.

The American People Have Been Complicit

It would be convenient to simply blame all of this on the federal government as if none of it were the fault of the American people themselves. Yet I’m not inclined to see it that way. I think the American people have largely been complicit in it all (some more than others). Whether due to ignorance, apathy, preoccupation with fruitless and mind-numbing endeavors (e.g., sports, Hollywood entertainment, fashion), we have been asleep at the wheel while our government has engaged for decades in endless wars, tyranny against its own citizens, and corruption at the highest levels.

Whatever one may think of abortion, the greater number of Americans did nothing to stop the slaughter of millions of babies in the womb. They still did nothing when partial-birth and even after-birth abortions were legally permitted. Is it the mark of a sane nation that allows its most innocent persons to be butchered because the developing baby is considered inconvenient? What kind of people have we become?

When millions of Third-World illegals invaded our soil, most Americans either didn’t care or thought it was a good thing. Little consideration was given to the long-term effects of mass immigration, especially from people who share neither our race, our culture, our worldview, our religion or values. And now Whites are becoming minorities in their own country. How’s that racial ‘diversity’ propaganda you’ve been fed your entire lives working for you?

When the federal government, including local governments, taxed many of us into poverty, did the American people unite and revolt? No, we are much too fractured.

We have no one to blame but ourselves. In the end, we get the kind of leaders we deserve.

Will the American people wake up? It would be nice to think so, but I suspect they will do so only after they have lost all their modern comforts, pensions, 401k savings, their homes, and are driven into extreme poverty. Hardship and adversity have a way of sobering us up. They will awaken from their slumber only when it’s too late. Even though the signs of national decline were evident many years prior, most Americans are unable to discern that the U.S. is a dying empire and will reach its end as all empires throughout history have done.