The Heresiarchs

9095 words

Everybody, deep in their hearts, is waiting for the end of the world to come
Haruki Murakami, ‘1Q84’

‘Don’t Look Now’[1]: Psycho-Historical Antecedents

For Western Europe, this current unhappy year 2025, not only marks the 80th anniversary of its Anglo-Saxon occupation, but also the 50th anniversary of the release of Pasolini’s 120 Days of Sodom (Salò o le 120 giornate di Sodoma). Undoubtedly, ‘Salò’ constitutes the most shocking cinematographic evidence of the cultural ‘reorientation’ of Eurasia’s Atlantic Rim, after the final victory of the Anglo-Saxon ‘Crusade against Europe’ ended its independence in that even unhappier ‘Zero Year’, 1945.[2] Although the film’s utterly depraved pornographic content and its deliberately antinomian director decisively preclude their inclusion in the canons of Western high art (the post-1945 sum total of which is remarkably meagre in any case), they still hold great diagnostic value for those few historians still inclined to study the current putrefaction stage of the ‘Decline of the West’. Even the outer circumstances of the film’s release, which took place some weeks after the death of its director, are heavy with appropriate symbolism: in a remarkable example of ‘life imitating art’, the gruesome details of Pasolini’s murder are seamlessly aligned with the psycho-dramatic program proposed in his final script, radically inverting and, of course, purposefully perverting what is commonly accepted as the West’s greatest literary creation: Dante’s Divine Comedy.[3] With the benefit of two generations of hindsight, its content may now be profitably projected on the course of recent Western psycho-history:

(1) Il girone delle manie ‘the circle of manias’ of 1970-1995, for which the prerequisite cultural tabula rasa of Stunde Null and economic consumer paradise of les trente glorieuses had been created by, respectively, the Greatest and Silent Generations (cohorts born 1890-1915 and 1915-1940). This ‘circle’ is realized by the Boomer Generation (cohort born 1940-1965), whose rise was heralded by the LARP-revolutions of ‘1968’, making Western Europe’s civilizational regression irreversible by the mid-1980s. Elsewhere, the author has suggested that, after the Boomers’ ‘march through the institutions’, the ‘ABBA’ years 1978-1980 mark the actual civilizational ‘point of no return’,[4] but the neoliberal scorched earth policies of the Reagan-Thatcher-Lubbers regime took some time to take full effect. The loss of techno-idealistic drive and basic geopolitical realism in Western civilization as a whole are most dramatically illustrated by two collapses on the Western frontiers: the Challenger disaster of 1986, effectively replacing the ‘Space Age’ exploration with ‘Star Wars’ megalomania, and the assassination of Rabin in 1995, effectively ending the decolonization era outside the West and marking the start of an all-out Anglo-Zionist crusade for global hegemony.

(2) Il girone della merda ‘the circle of excrement’ of 1995-2020, during which the now-maniacal Boomers, having descended into collective narcissism and unbridled consumerism and having abandoned the religious and ethical precepts of the Western Tradition, rule without checks and balances.[5] Beyond a shadow of a doubt, they have proven Kierkegaard’s words: remove the anguished conscience, and you may as well close the churches and turn them into dance halls. Rejecting Western Tradition, the Boomers have adopted a structurally inverted Weltanschauung, hence radically antinomian and overtly nihilistic, with all classical hallmarks of a (self-)destructive cult: behavioral and personality changes, loss of personal identity, cessation of scholastic activities, estrangement from family, disinterest in society and pronounced mental control and enslavement by cult leaders.[6] This internal ‘cultic’ condition has its counterpart in an aggressively proselytizing external ‘mission’ (exporting ‘values’ such as ‘liberal democracy’, ‘DEI’, ‘LGBTQ rights’, the ‘free market’, the ‘Rules Based Order’), resorting to forced conversion wherever necessary (ranging from soft-power ‘colour revolutions’ in the post-Soviet space to the ‘humanitarian interventions’ in the former Yugoslavia and the ‘Arab Spring’ bloodbath in the Middle East).

Under the Boomer regime, the West’s Weltanschauung, which may defined as cultural nihilism applied internally and satano-globalism applied externally, is also characterized by distinctly millenarian overtones: slogans such as Bush’s ‘New World Order’ and Fukuyama’s ‘End of History’ point to the ‘doomsday cult’ aspect of regime now ruling the ‘Collective West’. With the Boomers safely ensconced in privileged safety ‘bubbles’ (‘uniparty cartels’, ‘tenured positions’, ‘trust funds’, ‘gated communities’), the soul-crushing internal manifestations of this cultic regime, including neo-Victorian labour and housing conditions (‘deregulation’, ‘privatization), wholesale ethnic replacement (‘asylum seekers’, ‘labour migrants’) and the perversion of law and order (‘affirmative action’, ‘hate speech legislation’), are primarily borne by the Boomers’ children and grandchildren (Generation X, cohort 1965-1990, and the Millennials, cohort 1990-2015). The even more horrifying external manifestations, including IMF/World Bank-imposed debt slavery across the Global South (‘privatization’, ‘austerity’), mass human trafficking into the West (‘smuggler’ networks, ‘NGO’ facilities) and systematic violence to subdue anti-hegemonic resistance anywhere (engineered ‘extremist terrorism’, tailored ‘forever wars’), are primarily borne by the masses of the ‘s**thole countries’ of the Global South, whose psychological dehumanization precedes their necropolitical decimation. During this quarter of a century, which more or less equals the ‘Unipolar Moment’ in international politics, the internal and external victims of the Boomer elite’s New World Order found themselves caught drowning in this deliberately created ‘circle of excrement’.

(3) Il girone del sangue ‘the circle of blood’, starting in 2020, represents the final ‘Age of Consequences’ in Western psycho-history: with the ‘Covid Scamdemic’ and the follow-up ‘Vaccinocaust’, obviously aimed at tearing down the pillars of Western socio-economic life and culling the Western population, the once Boomer-based and West-centred New World Order project has crossed a historical threshold. Elsewhere, the author has pointed out that the ‘Ten Months That Shook the World’, between the ‘Covid’ lockdown of March 2020, through the ‘BLM’ summer and the ‘Biden’ coup autumn of the same year, and the ‘January 6th’ episode of 2021, effectively mark the final Fall of the West.[7] From that point onwards, the West is effectively defunct as a historically distinct Kulturkreis, leaving its remnant peoples and remnant institutions ‘captured’ (in older words: ‘possessed’) by unmitigated satano-globalism, creating a state of ‘zombification’ in which the name ‘Western’ is reduced to a highly deceptive place-holder term bereft of the cultural and civilization content and continuity that it once covered.[8] With the fading out of its carrier cohort, the Boomer Generation, the satano-globalist New World Order project itself is now undergoing a radical transformation, characterized by demographic metastasis as well as eschatological acceleration. Demographically, its predominantly White, late-stage paternalist and ‘culturally Christian’ demographic carrier is now replaced by a new rabidly anti-White, fiercely (f)emocratic and militantly anti-religious successor generation of hand-picked, ‘Manchurian Candidate’-type Young Global Leaders and a host of DEI minions, preferably proudly incompetent, unabashedly narcissistic and openly hostile to the interests of the ‘mass formation’-shaped slave populations that they are to rule.

Thus, ‘Europe’ is now ruled by the ‘power women’ likes of Finland’s ‘rainbow family’/‘topless office’ Sanna Marin, Estonia’s ‘war at any price’/‘hate Russia but not rubles’ Kaja Kallas and Germany’s ‘trying everything’/‘phizergate’ Ursula von der Leyen. Ideologically, the Boomers’ New World Order project is now rapidly shifting towards its only logically consistent end-state, which combines a techno-totalitarian surveillance state (abolition of civil rights) with a bio-leninist caste system (inversion of meritocracy) and a transhumanist agenda (bio-technical control) and which, given its pursuit of the ‘immanentization of the eschaton’, is perhaps best described by the term ‘satano-globalism’. Its necessary corollary in the domain of domestic and international Realpolitik is the normalization of what Achille Mbembe has aptly termed ‘necropolitics’, i.e. the state-sponsored condemnation to various (physical, psychological, cultural) forms of death and existential liminality of specific, greater or smaller, target populations in the pursuit of biopolitical aims. The most logically consistent application of necropolitics equals the ultimate application of transhumanism, i.e., the (technological) supersession of the whole of humanity, which in turn equals the aim of satanism, completing the ‘circle of blood’.

The sacred scriptures of the world’s great religions record several instances of whole nations caught up in vicious cycles of psycho-historical decay. Thus, on the boundary of recorded history, there is the dismal record of the days of Noah, when few heeded the gathering clouds. But there is no need to look back further than the more recent record of the days of Lot, when the first Sodom and Gomorrah went up in smoke:

Then the Awful Cry overtook them at the sunrise
And We utterly confounded them, and We rained upon them stones of heated clay
Lo! therein verily are portents for those who read the signs
– Quran 15:73-5

Sycorax’ Hour[9]: Necropolitical Preliminaries

Moving into the final phase of the three-circle trajectory, Western Europe now finds itself shorn of its existential essence, effectively bereft of the civilization, the culture and the identity that once defined it as the heartland of the West: it has now entered a post-Western existential state. During the first circle ‘mania’ phase, which corresponds to the Boomers’ 1970-1995 heyday, Western Europe abandoned its culture, inverting its Nomos archetype by adopting anti-ethics and anti-aesthetics. Moving through the second circle ‘excrement’ phase, which corresponds to the Boomers’ 1995-2020 decadence, Western Europe abandoned its civilization, inverting its Evangelion archetype through the coercive and violent pursuit of globalist-nihilist hegemony (geopolitical ‘Unipolarity’). Now entering the third circle ‘blood’ phase, starting with the Annus Horribilis of 2020 (the Covid-BLM-Biden operations resulting in the Fall of the West), Western Europe faces the inversion of its Techne archetype, as evidenced by the redirection of its φαρμακεία from life-saving medicine to transhumanist sorcery and by its redirection of its οἰκονομία from ploughshares to swords. The direct physical violence attendant on the inversion of the Techne archetype, rapidly expanding internally (‘gender surgery’, ‘vaccine damage’) as well as externally (‘Ukraine’, ‘Gaza’) and increasingly depersonalized through new technologies (‘drone warfare’, ‘AI targeting’), is compounded by novel forms of non-physical violence, particular to a new age of ‘hybrid’ and ‘multi-dimensional’ war and to a new reality of a ‘technologically framed’ world in which most of humanity is already (partially) absorbed in a matrix of multiple ‘alternative realities’ (‘virtual workspaces’, ‘digital communities’, ‘online dating’), such as ‘deplatforming’, ‘geofencing’ and ‘algorithmic censorship’. Rapid advances in information technology, nano-technology and bio technology, allowing for an unparallelled degree of real-time surveillance, subconscious manipulation and custom-made intervention in the lives of entire nations by nebulous forces entirely beyond the control of obsolete institutional ‘checks and balances’, are even now giving rise to a techno-totalitarianism of unprecedented scope and depth — the preparation of this ‘System of the Beast’, complete with a Palantir panopticon and a CBDC dungeon, is now approaching its final stage. At a whim, these techno-totalitarian forces can impose pandemics, create wars or disrupt supply-lines, unleashing the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse of plague, war, hunger and hell on a global scale, by simply choosing some convenient ‘narrative’, ‘locking down’ the economy, imposing ‘mass formation’ conditions, ‘deplatforming’ critical voices and, where necessary, moving dissenters ‘off the grid’. The Covid-BLM-Biden-vaccine narratives of 2020-21 were a successful test of how easily the population of the (ex-)West can be manipulated into self-destructive behaviour by these means and the Ukraine-Gaza narratives of 2022-23 showed how they can also be used to ‘weaponize’ whole nations against any designated external enemy, be it the greatest military power in the world (Russia) or a defenceless refugee population on a strip of desert land (Gaza). As a result, millions have already died without as much as a dent in the infernal mechanisms perpetuating the ‘circle of blood’.

As things stand now, it looks like the West’s psycho-historical trajectory will have to run its full course, with the lazy passivity and shameful apathy of the (ex-)Western masses gradually giving way to enthusiastic support and undisguised sadism, much like the exhaustion of the Roman Republic gave way to the cruelty of the Roman Empire. This psycho-historical devolution, by which the (ex-)West is now descending into a state of neo-atavism, is guided and exploited by those advocating it and profiting from it, but, once set in motion, it also has an autonomous, self-reinforcing dynamic: the systematic projection of collectively held complexes onto convenient scapegoat populations is a basic psychological mechanism that finds its ‘natural’ (viz. non-anagogically corrected) outlet in bloody sacrifice and ritual sadism (damnatio ad bestias, malleus maleficarum). Thus, it is not surprising that the neo-Christian, tradition-respecting, martially minded and nationally cohesive Russian people are maligned and assaulted by the nihilistic, anti-traditional, decadent and identity-less masses of the West. Similarly, it is not surprising that religiously open, ethnically open, history-immersed and spiritually minded Palestinians are despised and massacred by the religiously closed, ethnically closed, history-falsifying and materially oriented Zionist colonists who came to the Holy Land on an ‘inverted crusade’ mission from the West.

The start of the second Trump presidency, in January 2025, likely marks the point at which the last restraints on the rising blood lust of the West are removed in the international arena: the last remnants of the ‘rules based order’ (OSCE, ICC) and the ‘international institutions’ (WHO, UNWRA), already long obsolete, irretrievably biased and deeply corrupted in any case, are being relegated to the dustbin of history and the last pretences at professional diplomacy and balanced journalism are being discarded as superfluous relicts of an irrelevant past. Within the West, these are not, however, being replaced by the known — and safely predictable — modalities of earlier ages, such as hard-headed realism and brazen self-interest. At the inter-state level, neither imperial Realpolitik nor mercantilist calculus have staged a comeback in Western international politics: instead, chaos reigns supreme. A tipping point has been reached: after decades of deliberate miseducation, constant media propaganda, systemic corruption and anti-meritocratic programming, the inner decay of Western societies, thus far hidden by generational delay and institutional prestige, is finally starting to show on the outside, cracking the thus-far shallow but smooth outer façade in the international arena. Shamelessly, Tinder-quality ‘power women’, ‘openly gay’ golden boys, ‘affirmative action’ non-Westerners and ‘double-citizenship’ Zionists now claim to ‘represent’ ex-Western nations — without any thought for the most basic interests, or even survival, of the states that they claim to ‘lead’.

The leaders of the Eurasianist East and the Global South would make a grave mistake in assuming that these Western ‘leaders’ are seeking the peace, prosperity and well-being of the Western nations and states, or even that they are pursuing rational goals and calculated profits. On the contrary, pursuing sub-rational ‘emotions’ and pursuing non-calculable ‘experiences’, both exclusively related to narrowly narcissistic egos and exclusively derived from specific psychopathologies, these malignantly diseased predators, much like the vampires and zombies of literary and cinematographic fiction, should be assessed according to the mortal danger they pose to their prey, the latter category comprising all still authentically human individuals within the (ex-)West as well as all still authentically human societies across the rest of the world. These vampiric and zombified creatures may incidentally serve certain specific political agendas and certain specific economic interests, most transparently those of the ‘big banking’, ‘big business’, ‘big pharma’ and ‘big tech’ sectors which unleashed them on the world in pursuit of certain short-term projects, but they can and do run amuck, much like the monster created by Dr. Frankenstein. The world’s Witching Hour has begun.

Tis now the very witching time of night
When churchyards yawne and hell it selfe breakes out contagion to this world
– Shakespeare, Hamlet

‘15 Minutes’[10]: Demonological Perspectives

Unfortunately, the vampiric and zombified nature of the Western ‘leadership’ does reflects, to varying degrees across various areas of the West (less so in the still-Catholic and Orthodox part of the EU than in its ex-Protestant part and the overseas Anglosphere), the ‘katagogic’ metamorphosis that a significant part of the populace has undergone since the 1960s. These ‘lost soul’ masses, suffering staggering rates of obesity, body dysphoria, drug addiction, mental disease and ‘vaccine’ damage, provide a limited but dependable electoral base for the West’s vampiric and zombified ‘leadership’: thus, the intensely psychopathic[11] and increasingly grotesque characters currently representing the ‘Collective West’ do externally reflect the true inner state of the West. To the extent that other, less affected sections of the Western electorate still vaguely recognize the diseased nature of their society, however, they tend to vote for ‘controlled opposition’ figures that are only marginally less diseased than the fully vampiric and zombified ‘mainstream’ candidates and that have been carefully screened for their ability ‘compromise’ when the time is right.

Thus, all across the West, a whole host of ‘populist’ and ‘civic-nationalist’ false prophets are biding their time in the opposition benches, waiting in the wings of institutional power and standing by to take their turn at ‘leadership’. The moment their turn has come, however, they fall in line with the ‘establishment’, nudged by ample rewards and co-opted by the ‘powers that be’: their essential role is to serve as ‘lightning rods’ for societal discontent and to ‘put on a good show’. Since the early 2000s and all across the West, this mechanism has proven its efficiency, time and again, with ‘populists’ coming to power and nothing ever changing. Obscene income disparities, chronic housing shortages, generational income insecurity, wholesale ethnic replacement, intermittent terror waves, rampant grooming gangs, imploding family structures, collapsing education systems, woke-weaponized judiciaries, maliciously micromanaging bureaucracy, ubiquitous social media pornification, staggering addiction rates, unchecked transgender cultism — all these things are only getting worse. Over time, the accumulating weight of injustice, decadence and ugliness is creating a wave of suffering, disgust and despair that not many can bear. As the social, legal and political order dissolves under the combined aegis of kleptocracy (the banksters’ elite), pornocracy (the women’s rights’ elite), ochlocracy (the consumer mob) and idiocracy (the whore-nalysts of the media class and the mid-wits of the academic class) and as the number of ‘lost souls’ increases, daily life itself becomes surreally perverted until finally a tipping point is reached: the point beyond which reality itself breaks down, giving way to collective madness.

Forglobalists, leftists and run of the mill psychopaths, free will means the ability to choose not to believe in archetypes, or morality or even objective truth. They choose nihilism, but this is only part of the problem. The defiance of truth goes beyond some misguided attempt to be free from societal judgment. Instead, [these] people define freedom without responsibility as the ultimate state of being. In other words, they view the capacity to inflict suffering and destruction without regard as an evolutionary advantage. They think their lack of humanity makes them superhuman. It’s no mistake that leftists and woke activists are obsessed with power dynamics; their new religion ensures that they cannot see the world any other way. For woke ideologues everything revolves around which groups hold power and how they can take that power for themselves. Thus, questions of right and wrong never enter into the equation. Power is the end that justifies all means. They see moral order as an artificial construct that oppresses them, because they want to do evil without consequence. Moral relativism at its core requires the victimization of others as a form of rebellion against order.

Of course, the injustice of this mentality is hard to dismiss but leftists have a way around that. There’s no shortage of woke activists who have displayed a contempt for the law and for morals when they’re being judged, but they will joyfully embrace morals and the law when they think these things can be used against their enemies. Hypocritically, leftists like the idea of rules, but only for other people. Rules are a shield to prevent retribution from the people they victimize. That’s the only purpose rules serve for the woke. To summarize, leftists are total relativists. The rules do not apply to them. The law does not apply to them. Morality does not apply to them. Conscience is non-existent for them or it exists but they have trained their minds to ignore it. Biological reality does not apply to them. They think they are special and that boundaries should only exist for the people they don’t like. This is pure evil. There’s no other rational way to look at it.[12]

Thus, within the West, the second Trump presidency, following the ‘Biden Era’ socio-economic and legal-moral bankruptcy of its system of governance and reflecting the post-‘9/11’, post-‘Covid’, post-‘QAnon’ implosion of its public trust, may be said to mark a perceptual tipping point: this is point at which the boundary between reality and fiction breaks down and at which the audience and the actors merge. The line dividing the carefully choreographed LARPs of the Washington spin-doctors and the Hollywood mind-benders from real-life psychopathy and kinetic violence has been crossed. Ironically but appropriately, this emerging ‘alternative reality’ is ushered in by former reality show and talk radio host Donald Trump, now appointed Entertainer-in-Chief. At the sounding of this second ‘trump’, in the twinkling of an eye, all is changed: nightmarish forces, including demonic entities and ghoulish dispositions long ago cast out into the outer dark by Christian morality, are now pouring back into waking reality through the crumbling ‘walls of the world’. Taking possession of the ‘lost souls’ of the West, they will inflict their ‘15 minutes’ of triumph on an unsuspecting humanity: ab occidente tenebrae.

Hell is empty and all the devils are here
– Shakespeare, The Tempest

Operation Pandemonium: Kakistocratic Mechanisms

Outside the West, it is now widely recognized that the deliberate promotion of degeneracy and the targeted application of terror have been key strategies in imposing globalist-nihilist hegemony over the Eurasian East and the Global South ever since the end of World War II. The twin strategies of ‘hearts and minds’ and ‘shock and awe’ to demoralize and destroy non-compliant populations and enemy states may be nothing new as imperialist tools, but the globalist-nihilist versions of both are characterized by two significant innovations: the scientific mass-application of social engineering and the ‘inverse engineering’ of societal structures and state institutions to achieve an antinomian end-state. Inside the West, these same twin strategies have also been applied, but with greater sophistication and in different dosages: whereas the wholesale slaughter of tens of thousands of civilian enemies was required outside the West (e.g. the Phoenix Program in Indochina and Operation Condor in Latin America), the surgical removal of the occasional high-profile (semi-)dissident sufficed in Europe and North America (e.g., Malcolm X in America in 1965, Veronica Guerin in Ireland in 1996, Pim Fortuyn in the Netherlands in 2002, Udo Ulfkotte in Germany in 2017). The submission to globalist-nihilist-dominion of indigenous Western populations, posing a potential but permanent political threat to the hostile elite within its geographic home-base territory, was primarily achieved through subterfuge – at least till the point that these populations were sufficiently reduced in relative demographic weight vis-à-vis the Third World colonists that they ultimately were to be replaced with (a process formally begun with the Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965). Thus, side by side with the policies of anti-natalism (‘women’s rights’, ‘sexual liberation’, ‘birth control’) and mass-immigration (‘guest labour’, ‘asylum seekers’, ‘family unification’), an unprecedented program of miseducation, disinformation and gaslighting was gradually put in place, based on psycho-social deprogramming, socio-economic conditioning and culture distortion. The result is a multi-layered system of institutionalized deception, reaching from collective longue durée culture (foundational mythology, archetypal identity, deep history) to individual day-to-day experience (news cycle, bureaucratic status, financial security).

Arguably, the important mechanism underpinning this full spectrum deception is the manipulation of language because truth has to be spoken to power and the most efficient way to repress the truth is by controlling speech itself: if a man cannot say what he means, he will never mean what he says. The long-term effect of systematic Orwell-type linguistic manipulation, exploiting basic cognitive mechanisms such as psychological bias, confirmation bias, reflexive thinking and apophenia and enhanced by sophisticated marketing strategies such as demographic targeting and subliminal messaging, is to reduce the meaning of words to highly exploitable placeholder variables, resulting in highly manipulable collective states of cognitive dissonance and paranoia.

The deliberate weaponization of various forms of modern art is an important element in this process of language manipulation: art shapes language and perception by creating association shortcuts and artfully crafted propaganda can perform a very efficient ‘thought crime stop’ function. Properly ‘marketed’ and artfully crafted, propaganda can induce collective states of irrationality and infantilization, creating a buffer of ‘protective stupidity’ between the rulers and the ruled, eliminating the individual reasoning and maturity on which collective rationality and civic responsibility depend. Deliberately blurred, the boundary between reality and fiction can thus be ‘artistically’ adjusted in either direction: prime examples of how such adjustments on the sliding scale from ‘historical fact’ to ‘conspiracy theory’ are taking place over time are the many Hollywood-Pentagon co-production ‘files’, ‘disclosures’ and ‘investigations’ covering the ‘controversial’ subjects of JFK, UFOs and 9/11 — all incomplete in terms of information given to the public. But such boundary adjustments do not only take place retroactively, as in ‘rewriting the past’, but also proactively, as in ‘shaping the future’, through a clever combination of artistic precognition and cultic protocol: prime examples of this ‘predictive programming’ are Hollywood-Pentagon co-produced movies such as ‘Contagion’ (2011, ‘pandemic preparedness’), ‘Transcendence’ (2014, ‘transhumanism preparedness’), ‘Finch’ (2021, ‘climate change preparedness’), ‘Leave the World Behind’ (2023, ‘hybrid war preparedness’), ‘Civil War’ (2024, ‘Trump preparedness’) and ‘Zero Day’ (2025, ‘deep state take-over preparedness’). These retroactive and proactive manipulations of language and art, in which virtual and alternative realities are created, must be understood as essential elements of the information warfare, now broadening to cognitive warfare by which the Western hostile elite is seeking to maintain and enhance its power: cognitive warfare degrades the capacity to know, produce or thwart knowledge.[13] As the Western hostile elite shifting into ‘flight forward’ mode both at home and abroad, its use of tricks, pranks and fakes to achieve ‘full spectrum dominance’ is becoming increasingly obvious: the ‘news’ and ‘analyses’ put out by the Western legacy media are now so transparently biased and absurd that the West’s cognitive bubble can now be properly described as an ‘Empire of Lies’. This output is also starting to show remarkable similarity, in reality-bending technique if not anagogic intent, to the propaganda output of the Third Reich, including straight-forward Nazi-era parodies such presenting NATO as fighting the barbaric hordes on a new Eastern Front for Lebensraum (read: raw material and real estate collateral for Black Rock and Vanguard) and European civilization (read: the sacrosanct rights to have gay discos and transgender surgeries), and the EU as promoting media Gleichschaltung for the protection of values. [A] wave of repression [is] sweeping the major Western states.It is a structural movement in government of the worst kind. It can only be compared to the wave of fascism that swept much of Europe in the 1930s.The now-threadbare mantle of public intellectual in the West has passed to lightweight figures like Jordan Peterson and populist Islamophobes like Douglas Murray.[14]

The effect of full spectrum deception is to induce a state of highly manipulable ‘fluidity’ at all levels of human existence, a ‘we will never know the truth’ state at the collective and at the individual level, befitting the ‘Age of Aquarius’ spirit permeating the Western public sphere at the time when the techniques underpinning it were perfected in various ‘MKUltra’-type experimentation programs. This state of fluidity, in which all collective forms of identity (religion, ethnicity, caste, lineage, gender) were first ‘critiqued’ and then ‘deconstructed’ in all experiential domains, gradually caused the atomization of the collective and the alienation of the individual. As the traditional concepts of the church, the nation and the family as collective reference points were demolished and as the natural hierarchies of age, gender and ability were denied, community gave way to ‘society’, culture was replaced by ‘entertainment’, vocation was exchanged for ‘career’, artisanship shifted to ‘production’, aesthetic values were superseded by ‘consumer choices’, knowledge was reduced to ‘opinion’ and private morality abdicated to ‘public opinion’. As this process reached its logical conclusion, a collective state of malignant narcissism came to reflect the individual state of counterfeit identity adopted by the rootless masses of the ‘collective West’, as reflected in the ‘modernized’ public institutions catering to their new need. Thus, ‘modernized’ churches turned anti-transcendental, reflecting the exclusively here-and-now ‘life style choices’ of their ‘liberated’ members (hence their feminist and woke-oriented personnel, their vernacular and sentimentalized services and their politicized and activist messaging), ‘modernized’ academia turned anti-meritocratic, reflecting their new ‘equal opportunity’ clientele (calculating tinder girls preparing for post-age 30 sinecures, ambitious metrosexual soy-boys pursuing laptop-career bubble lives, and resentful BIPOCs bent on ethnic vengeance), and ‘modernized’ state institutions turned anti-justice, reflecting the narrow interests of the West’s bankster elite, which seeks to nullify all political and legal checks and balances on its power to exploit the masses domestically and the non-West internationally. The latter inversion of state power, which meant that state institutions abandoned the Katechon principle (protection of the weak and encouragement of virtue), effectively resulted in politicide and kakistocracy, shielding the predatory and parasitic globalist hostile elite from political repercussions and legal accountability.

By 2020, after four decades of West-led liberal neo-imperialism (the post-WWII bipolar era) and three decades of West-based globalist hegemony (the post-Cold War unipolar moment), the twin strategies to achieve globalist-nihilist hegemony, i.e., the full spectrum promotion of counterfeit values and ideas and the necropolitical application of war and terror, had resulted in the de facto end of effective resistance inside the West as well as the de facto submission of most states outside the West. Domestically, real dissident voices had been silenced and replaced by controlled opposition LARPs. Internationally, sovereign state power outside the West-led ‘rules-based order’ had been significantly reduced: a few minor anomalies (Serbia, Syria, Cuba, Venezuela) aside, only the military molochs the Eurasia (Russia, China, Iran, North Korea) and some of their direct neighbours (Belarus, the -stans, Vietnam, Laos) retained any trace of true sovereignty. At this point, however, the West’s ruling elite fell victim to the great bane of all would-be rulers of the world: hubris. About its the decision to ‘go for broke’, the why question may, up to a point, be argued: perhaps the ruling elite’s ‘flight forward’ was triggered by a ‘Nature Bats Last’-style calculus of looming ecological collapse, or by a ‘Georgia Guidestones’-style calculus at global population billions reaching the magic number 8, or by the approaching biological expiry date of the boomer core of the hostile elite, or simply by the need to conquer the immense resources of Eurasia to provide additional collateral for the banksters to be able to continue the global financial Ponzi Scheme — it does not matter.

The how question, however, is beyond dispute: in March 2020, the globalist elite decided to impose fully fledged techno-feudalism within the West (the ‘Covid’ psyop, enabling socio-economic lockdown and massive wealth transfers to the top, the ‘Biden’ coup, ending residual free speech and residual legal recourse, the ‘vaccine’ roll-out, culling the masses and paving the way to transhumanism) and, in April 2022, it decided to take down Russia, the most powerful remaining sovereign state remaining outside the West, through a combination of military pressure (Project Ukraine), political subversion (terror campaign and black propaganda), economic starvation (sanctions and blockade). Once again, both of these agendas were pursued by the twin strategies of counterfeit concepts and necropolitical violence. The domestic agenda combined an artificial narrative (‘Covid’), a counterfeit crisis (‘lockdown’) and a convenient scapegoat (‘unvaccinated’) with unabridged democide, viz., the Vaccinocaust.

Similarly, the international agenda combined an invented nationality (removing the sub-category ‘Ukrainian’ from the overall category ‘Russian’), an artificial state (claiming rule over the Bolshevik SSR territory for the Majdan regime) and a fictitious narrative (projecting imperialist design and aggressive intent to the Moscow government) with prolonged, large-scale military conflict, viz., the Ukraine War. In the Western masses, both agendas induced a permanent state of ‘mass formation’, achieving a level of collective psychosis and hallucination unprecedented in recorded history but entirely compatible with their preceding decades of scientifically engineered conditioning. In such a society, characterized by institutionalized cognitive dissonance, where sexual perversion substitutes biological gender, administrative citizenship overrides birth nationality and individual grievances prevail over the common good, literally anything is possible — including the unopposed rule of undisguised evil. After the completion of Operation Mockingbird, which achieved the cultic ‘deprogramming’ of the Western masses, and Operation Mindf**k, which achieved their cultic ‘immunity’ to reason, the globalist-nihilist ruling elite is now free to unleash its final offensive to conquer the world: Operation Pandemonium.

Exploiting the NBICs (Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Sciences), the globalist West’s ability to wage cognitive war has been exponentially enhanced, approaching the point at which a shift from artificial intelligence to artificial identity and from trans-humanism to anti-humanism can and will be made. As the cognitive-domain global arms race heats up, the Eurasian East will be forced to speed up its counter-measure response time as well as reinvent its innovation cycle – this is the era of dromocracy.[15] Operation Pandemonium is about to commence.

Now I lay me down to sleep
Pray the Lord my soul to keep
If I die before I wake
Pray the Lord my soul to take
Hush, little baby
Don’t say a word
Never mind that noise you heard
It’s just the beasts under your bed
In your closet, in your head
Exit light, enter night
Take my hand
We’re off to never-never land
– ‘Enter Sandman’, Metallica

The Cainite Strain: Antinomian Continuities

The previous paragraphs sketched the psycho-historical, necropolitical, demonological and kakistocractic trajectories of the Crisis of the Modern West, which is now obviously closing in on its dénouement. At this point, an attempt should be made to address the question as to its probable outcome. After all, even if the West itself is assumed to be irrevocably lost, the Rest still will have to face considerable (geopolitical, macro-economic) fall-out and would have to deal with significant (material, human) debris. As Western civilization approaches its ‘event horizon’, to be either utterly destroyed or fundamentally transformed, its overall historical arc is becoming increasingly clear and an educated guess as to its final destiny becomes feasible. Preliminary to providing ‘guestimate’, this paragraph serves to more precisely sketch out the historical arc to be followed.

If the Christian Tradition that has essentially shaped Western civilization is taken as its ‘factory settings’ reference point and if the Crisis of the Modern West is analysed according to the ‘thesis-antithesis’ dialectic method, then many of the structural inversions characterizing that crisis appear as entirely logical — even predictable. The overall historical trajectory becomes clear: as its original Christian world vision and its Christian mission statement are structurally inverted, the West comes to adopt a diametrically opposed world vision and mission statement. Thus, the West does not merely become post-Christian or non-Christian: it becomes anti-Christian, espousing values and aims that are antithetical to those of the Christian Tradition. The Church’s negative anthropology (‘original sin’) is replaced by a positive anthropology (‘human rights’), its prescription for individual world-overcoming (time-independent transcendence) is replaced by a push towards collective world-absorption (history-bound materialism) and its anagogic socio-cultural structures (disciplined hierarchies promoting good works) are replaced by anti-meritocratic anarcho-tyranny (hedonist atavism inhibiting good works). Essentially, the Christianity-shaped archetypal idea(l) of the Nomos, once guiding the West in the abstract (religious conscience) and the concrete (worldly law), is replaced by its logical counterpart: antinomianism.

Throughout its history, Christianity has always faced antinomian challenges, either embedded within ‘non-own’ (old, external) religious forms or within ‘home-grown’ (new, internal) heresies, but the greatest of these challenges came with the eighteenth-century rise of the ‘Enlightenment’ in the West. Although the founders, thinkers and adherents of the ‘Enlightenment’, which caused and includes all of nineteenth- and twentieth-century historical-materialism (liberalism, anarchism, socialism, communism), claim that they stand aside from religion, their ideas and movements all necessarily take the form of heresies of Christianity: they originate in, are shaped by and relate to an entirely Christian society. This is implicitly and sufficiently shown in their stand for ‘secularity’ (i.e., an antithetical position vis-à-vis religion), ‘science’ (i.e., an antithetical position vis-à-vis revelation) and ‘humanism’ (i.e., an antithetical position prioritizing creation over the Creator). But the discursive power of the ‘Enlightenment’ heresies is precisely located in their (apparent) lack of engagement with Christian doctrine — or any other religious doctrine. Neither the older ‘Gnostic’ heresies besetting early Christianity (e.g., the Nicolaitans, Borborites and Carpocratians) nor the newer ‘doctrinal’ heresies plaguing institutional Christianity (e.g. the Pelasgians, Almaricians and Dulcinians) ever came close to the success of these ‘Enlightenment’ heresies. From a Traditionalist perspective, the success of these ‘Enlightenment’ heresies can be explained by their radical rejection of the most basic foundations of all religious life, which are the quest for transcendence, the experience of the numinous, and the knowledge of the Sacred: this rejection befits the current state of the human world, now entering the Kali Yuga, which is the final phase of the Great Cycle of the Ages. The current physical, intellectual and spiritual state of humanity is so much degraded that now, for the average person, even the simplest requirements of traditional religion are too great a burden, numinous experiences are beyond the range of perception and transcendence is impossible, if not inconceivable.

This is not to say that the many heresies besetting Christianity, past and present, small and great, do not also possess a time- and place-independent common dominator, which can be deduced from their effect, which is antinomianism, i.e., their incompatibility with the wellbeing and continuance of humanity. Because, in the final analysis, antinomian practice, taken to its logical conclusion, does not merely serve ritual ‘deprogramming’ (as in child abuse grooming), ceremonial ‘counter-initiation’ (as in masonic degree transition) and cultic ‘dehumanization’ (as in adenochrome harvesting), but also the realization of a larger, long-term aim: human extinction. The promotion of anti-natalism, trans-sexualism and trans-humanism, which are among the final practical outcomes of ‘Enlightenment’ heresies irrespective of their initial theoretical precepts, is a recurrent feature in all antinomian movements. As an adjunct to trans-humanism, there may also be noticed the promotion of sub-humanism, through the idolization of theriomorphy, in which humans abandon the human state and are transformed, voluntarily or involuntarily, into chimaeras, such as vampires, werewolves and zombies. In 2021, the mere propagandistic promotion of this sub-humanization agenda was augmented by the imposition of coercive laws, prompting large sections of the Western masses to accept mRNA injections and submit to altering their genetic codes. Another, more obvious sign that physical alterations to the human form, preliminary to the eventual elimination of humanity as a whole, are gaining ‘mainstream’ acceptance throughout the West is the exponential rise in the visibility of body-altering tattoos, piercings, plastic surgery and transgender operations.

Consistently, antinomianist movements set out to ‘free’ women from the ‘curses’ of marriage, childbearing and motherhood, and the method of ‘freeing’ them is to flatter them by ‘equality’ (i.e., ignoring female weaknesses), to talk them into ‘emancipation’ (i.e. eliminating male protectors) and to make them aspire to the status of ‘hierodule’ (i.e., separating the sexual and procreative functions). It should be noted that, within such movements, women tend to have very prominent leadership roles: leaving aside the mythological record of female archons, such as Adam and Eve’s forgotten daughter Norea, who tried to set fire to Noah’s ark, there were as many female heresiarchs in pre-modern times (Marcellina, Helena, Philomena, Flora, etc.) as there are in modern times (Fatemeh Baraghani, Helena Blavatsky, Simone de Beauvoir, Germaine Greer, etc.). From this perspective, it is no surprise that, in the increasingly antinomian West, a strikingly high number of women have recently come to occupy the (at least formally) highest positions of political leadership. There is no need to repeat the short list of female political ‘luminaries’ given in the first paragraph: this femocratic role call is part of emo-history rather than psycho-history. In short: modern Western matriarchy in its counter-cultural and neo-atavistic manifestations, including exogamic ‘open borders’ in politics, home impulse-driven ‘conspicuous consumerism’ in the economy, all-pervasive pornocracy in the social media, all-levelling idiocracy in education, ‘virtue-signalling’ taboos in the public square and ‘open relations’ in the private sphere, are predictable side-effects of the victory of antinomian heresy in the West. Thus, the ‘Enlightenment’ has plunged the West into a new Dark Age.

For convenience, the antinomian common denominator of the host of heresies faced by Christianity over the centuries may be referred to as the Cainite Strain, after those — supposedly fictitious — followers of humanity’s first assassin. Such reference has the advantage of allowing the sacred scripture of the Abrahamic religions to shed light upon the obscure origins and the hidden continuities of antinomian heresy. Over the 19th and 20th centuries, the gradual spread of ‘Enlightenment’ heresy across the Christian world, disguised as socialism, communism and liberalism, triggered substantive investigations into canonical and apocryphal scripture to discover the nature of the Mark of Cain and the identity of the Serpent Seed. Undoubtedly, some of these investigations led to over-simplified conclusions and race-determinist distractions (including the ‘update’ from the Calvinist predestination doctrine to the contemporary ‘reptile class’s’ conspiracy theory), but, as a collective endeavour, they had the advantage of raising public awareness that the ancient curse of antinomian heresy had returned to the Christian world and its ultimate origins had to be properly understood before it could be effectively combatted. In this matter, the mythopoeic nature and psychosocial functionality of the specific origin myths and cultic customs adhered to by various antinomian heretical groups should not be allowed to distract from the very real effectiveness of the resulting ‘constructed identities’ in gaining political and economic powers for these groups. Because, hidden in the shades of the secularist and scientific ‘Enlightenment’ heresies of socialism, communism and liberalism, very real political and economic power was being accumulated by a loose conglomerate of cultic groups adhering to non-secular and non-scientific myths and customs, from eighteenth-century Free Masonry and nineeenth-century-century Anglo-Saxon Israelism to twentieth-century Zionism and twentieth-first-century nihilist globalism.[16] Important common features shared between these various iterations of this cultic conglomerate are the recurring themes of unchallenged global hegemony to be ruled by a Chosen People, the re-establishment of an Ancient Covenant, the building of a New World Order and the rebuilding of a Temple. The increasingly open messaging of this of this ethnic-cultic conglomerate, which has recently begun exiting its self-spun shade and is about to take centre-stage in world affairs, now allows for a realistic estimate of its progress along its collective Nigra Peregrinatio — and its final destination:

Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves
That ye are the children of them which killed the prophets
Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers
Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?
– Matthew 23:31-3

Nigra Peregrinatio: Holocaustological Horizons

The Crisis of the Modern West proper may be said to have started at roughly the same time in the geopolitical as well as the numino-political realm: the U.S.-U.S.S.R. military occupation of the European heartland was completed in May 1945 and the discovery of the ancient heretical texts at Nag Hammadi took place in December 1945. In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the fatal weakening of its worldly and spiritual Katechon forces meant that Europe no longer had any defence against the spread of antinomian heresy: gradually, its political, economic and social system became distorted, until a point of no return was reached in all domains of life. At the same time, another, ‘cultic’ war was waged on Europe aimed at the inversion of its religious identity and values, by the rewriting and overwriting of the history and doctrine of its identity-shaping Christian Tradition. Synchronized with the discovery of the Nag Hammadi and Qumran heretical texts (1945, 1947), the New Israel identity of old Christian Europe was eliminated through the establishment of the Zionist ‘State of Israel’ and the Holocaust Claims Conference (1948, 1951). Thus, ex-Christian Europe, which had once sent out mighty crusader armies to conquer the Holy Land and colonize the Near East, found itself militarily and psychologically conquered by the same cabal of the largely Anglosphere-based Cainite heresiarchs that ran the Zionist colony in Palestine.

Claiming to represent the ancient ‘Israelites’, either by ‘Jewish’ birth descent or by ‘Judeo-Christian’ ideological allegiance (both categories representing historical frauds according to authoritative historians), these Cainite heresiarchs then proceeded to claim a ‘blank cheque’ from history based on a holocaustological narrative custom-designed to fit the collective Post-Traumatic Stress Syndrome of the European peoples after World War II. Soon enough, the European peoples found themselves in the role of willing ‘Stockholm Syndrome’ accomplices to all crimes perpetrated by their heresiarchical hostile elite. These include not only the crimes committed overseas against the peoples of the Middle East (Naqba, Arab Spring, Gazacaust)[17] and the Global South (‘austerity program’ neo-colonialism, ‘shock-therapy’ disaster capitalism, ‘humanitarian intervention’ war), but also those committed at home against the peoples of the West themselves (ethnic replacement through mass immigration, family breakdown through social engineering, debt slavery through neo-liberal usury). Within the West, the now decades-old holocaustological narrative, perpetuated by educational dogma, media censorship and lawfare blackmail, has resulted in a mass cult of ‘judeolatry’ impervious to historical fact, rational argument and legal procedure. Its cultic symbols pervade the entire West, from ubiquitous Stolpersteine and Noahide rainbow flags in the street to endlessly repeating holocaust-themed films and talk shows in the mass media.

The very first Stolperstein, set on 16 December 1992 in front of Cologne City Hall, with Heinrich Himmler‘s order for the initiation of deportations

Here it should be explicitly and emphatically stated that, from a Traditionalist perspective, the self-identification of the heresiarchs ruling the West with any authentic Tradition or any authentic religious or ethnic identity, as it attempts vis-à-vis ‘Judaism’ and the ‘Jews’, represents nothing but a shallow counterfeit — an abomination short and simple.[18] The fact that the consistent attempt by the heresiarchs ruling the West to associate themselves (either directly or indirectly) with the Mosaic religion (i.e., Judaism, a remnant form of earlier Abrahamic religions) and the Jewish ethnicity (i.e., the Israelites, a polygenic population formerly defined by Mosaic religious practice but now lacking any such delineation) is a transparent fraud, as shown by the fact that they do not adhere to any religious Tradition and do not practice any citizenship allegiance except to that of the ‘State of Israel’, i.e., their own self-invented and entirely artificial Zionist colony in Palestine. Judaism, a religious Tradition only still authentically adhered to by small remnant groups such as Neturei Karta, is so entirely hostile to any collective project of worldly dominion and any personal indulgence of antinomian freedom as to be entirely incompatible with the heresiarchs’ globalist-nihilist project. To the contrary, it may very well be argued that within authentic Judaism, just as in any other authentic religious Tradition, lies the key to the redemption of the Mark of Cain assumed by the heresiarchs. Specific to Judaism is the concept of the ba’al tshuva, or ‘master of the return’, referring to the personal redemption of sin by the acknowledgement of guilt (‘atonement of shortcoming’), and its pre-emption by conscientious orthopraxy (‘walking in righteousness’). Without a doubt, Judaism is the most Nomos-detailing of all of the Abrahamic religions: as such, it is diametrically opposed to the antinomianism practiced and propagated by the heresiarchs now ruling the West. In that sense, Judaism invites those heresiarchs claiming ‘Jewish’ heritage to repentance — now and here, before it is too late.

It is usually said that Judaism is the standpoint of the law. However, this could also be expressed by saying that Judaism lies in anxiety. But here the nothing of anxiety signifies something other than fate. It is in this sphere that the phraseto be anxious-nothing’ appears most paradoxical, for guilt is indeed something. Nevertheless, it is true that as long as guilt is the object of anxiety, it is nothing. The ambiguity lies in the relation, for as soon as guilt is posited, anxiety is gone, and repentance is there. The relation, as always with the relation of anxiety, is sympathetic and antipathetic. This in turn seems paradoxical, yet such is not the case, because while anxiety fears, it maintains a subtle communication with its object, cannot look away from it, indeed will not, for if the individual wills it, repentance is there.

That someone or other will find this statement difficult is something I cannot help. He who has the required firmness to be, if I dare say so, a divine prosecutor, not in relation to others but in relation to himself, will not find it difficult. Furthermore, life offers sufficient phenomena in which the individual in anxiety gazes almost desirously at guilt and yet fears it. Guilt has for the eye of the spirit the fascinating power of the serpent’s glance. The truth in the view of attaining perfection through sin lies at this point. It has its truth in the moment of decision when the immediate spirit posits itself as spirit by spirit. Contrariwise, it is blasphemy to hold that this view is to be realized in concreto. It is precisely by the anxiety of guilt that Judaism is further advanced than Greek culture, and the sympathetic factor in its anxiety-relation to guilt may be recognized by the fact that it would not at any price forego this relation in order to acquire the more rash expressions of Greek culture: fate, fortune, misfortune. Kierkegaard

As outlined in the first paragraph, the West crossed the psycho-historical threshold of the ‘circle of blood’ in 2020. Their ‘culture distortion’ program having run its course, the antinomian heresiarchs have now effectively made the Western masses complicit in their crimes, including those crimes perpetrated against themselves. The sado-masochistic shift from victim to perpetrator has been completed and the Western masses now identify with their rulers, to the extent that antinomian heresy has become the norm and even open genocide has become accepted practice whenever deemed necessary to uphold the cultic narrative, as in Gaza. As befitting antinomian heresy, that cultic narrative, however, is as flexible in content and form as the heresiarchical elite itself: both the narrative and the elite can and do shape-shift with amazing alacrity, ditching used-up stories and people and absorbing new stories and people to suit the final aim of the movement. The recent ‘radicalization’ of the narrative and leadership throughout the West proves the point: the media shift to the justification of ethnic cleansing and open genocide in the Holy Land and the policy shift to ‘Israel First’ governance in the United States and Germany indicate the rapid Zionization and Israelization[19] of the West.[20] The absence of any substantial resistance to these developments proves that the West, as a whole, has fallen into unapologetic evil, encouraging the ruling heresiarchs to hasten their ‘inverse crusade’ against those still resisting their Griff nach der Weltmacht across the Eurasian East and the Global South. They may very well overreach as they resort to this Flucht nach Vorn, but those opposing it, whether still resisting their rule inside West or fighting it in the Eurasian East and Global South, should never forget that, ultimately, they are merely representatives of a much older and much more dangerous, viz. non-human enemy. They should also remember that the program the West-based heresiarchs are ultimately working for is not at all concerned with human power – or any human purpose. Rather, this program is essential inhuman and anti-human: it is to immanentize the eschaton and realize the rule of the antichrist. In that sense, the heresiarchs should not only be fought by worldly means: they should also be fought by spiritual means. First, they should be called upon to repent and turn away from their pilgrimage to Chorazin. Finally, those still refusing should be exorcised, by all possible means, and cast into the Outer Darkness.

Errare humanum est, perseverare diabolicum

Coda: Occidentalist Epilogue

Because the author hails from the fallen West and because his fate is linked to its fate, it is appropriate that this epilogue should serve the edification of his fellow Westerners. The question, however, arises as to what is still worth saying.

The handful of colleagues and comrades who, over the last years, tried but failed to prevent and remedy the Fall of the West do not need words of solace and support — they ‘know the score’ and have, accordingly, either made themselves scarce or resigned themselves to the approaching final judgement. The rest of the Dissident Right, now effectively defunct but until recently the only movement conceivably capable of altering the political trajectory of the West, has either betrayed or abandoned the cause. Most of its ‘White Nationalists’, now amply subsidized by NATOstan agencies, have aligned themselves with the most psychopathic Russophobe elements of the Kiev regime. Most of its ‘Civnat Conservatives’, now comfortably co-opted by the new ‘right-wing’ governments of the West, have resorted to the richer pickings of militant Zionism and populist islamophobia.[21] Most of its ‘intellectual leaders’, already compromised by their failure to stand up and be counted on the Great Reset issues of ‘Covid’, ‘vaccines’, ‘Ukraine’ and ‘Gaza’, have been deceived and discredited by the trompe-l’œil of the Trump Moment.

On the Western masses, now hopelessly mired in irredeemable decadence and wilful ignorance, no more words should be wasted. Unworthy of their ancestors, they flounder.

Entartet Geschlecht, unwert der Ahnen! Wohin, Mutter, vergabst du die Macht über Meer und Sturm zu gebieten? O zahme Kunst der Zauberin, die nur Balsamtränke noch braut! Erwache mir wieder, kühne Gewalt, herauf aus dem Busen wo du dich bargst! Hört meinen Willen, zagende Winde! Heran zu Kampf und Wettergetös! Zu tobender Stürme, wütendem Wirbel, treibt aus dem Schlaf dies träumende Meer! Weckt aus dem Grund seine grollende Gier! Zeigt ihm die Beute die ich ihm biete! Zerschlag es dies trotzige Schiff, des zerschellten Trümmer verschlings! Und was auf ihm lebt, den wehenden Atem, den lass ich euch Winden zum Lohn!

‘Degenerate race, unworthy of your ancestors! How, o mother, did you dispose of the power of ruling sea and tempest? O feeble art of the sorceress, now only cooking up curative potions! Raise up in me once again, bold power, rise up from my breast where you have lain concealed! Give ear to my will, half-hearted winds! Off to battle and storm! Into the raging tempest and furious vortex, raise from her slumber this somnolent sea! Awaken from her depth her malevolent greed! Show her the prize that I have to offer! Let her smash this insolent ship, let her gorge on her shattered wreckage! And whatever has life on her, that faint breath. I leave as reward for you winds!’ – Wagner, Tristan und Isolde


Notes

[1] Title of an occult-themed thriller film (Nicholas Roeg, 1973), artistically depicting the effects of clairvoyance and precognition – appropriate to the Biblical record of the fate of Lot’s wife Ado, who was turned into a pillar of salt when she turned during her family’s flight from Sodom.

[2] Skewed reference to the wartime memoir Crusade in Europe by Dwight Eisenhower,  former Supreme Commander Allied Expeditionary Force, published in 1948.

[3] For the author’s short-hand ‘top five’ of European high literature, cf. Alexander Wolfheze, Globus Horribilis, Twelve Futuro-Fundamentalist Essays (Arktos: London, 2024) 572-81.

[4] Cf. Wolfheze, Globus Horribilis, 21-7.

[5] The author’s aetiology of the Crisis of the Modern West, cf. Alexander Wolfheze, Alba Rosa. Ten Traditionalist Essays about the Crisis in the Modern West (Arktos: London, 2019).

[6] Florence Kaslow and Marvin Sussman, Cults and the Family (Haworth, 1982).

[7] For the author’s full analysis of the Annus Horribilis events of 2020, cf. Wolfheze, Globus Horribilis, 35-118.

[8] For the author’s sphere impressions of the direct aftermath of the Fall of the West, cf. Wolfheze, Globus Horribilis, 119-45.

[9] Reference to the sea witch Sycorax, the ‘Scythian Raven’, mentioned in Shakespeare’s play The Tempest as the mother of the mooncalf creature Caliban, both inhabitants of some unspecified ‘cannibal isle’ in the Atlantic – appropriate to the black arts-practicing Neo-Atlanticist heresiarchs ruling the West.

[10] Title of a thriller film (John Herzfeld, 2001), artistically depicting the effects of ‘applied antinomianism’ in the context of a collectively narcissist society, set in NYC, the West’s ‘heart of darkness’. The title itself refers to Andy Warhol’s quotation ‘in the future, everybody will be world-famous for 15 minutes’, accurately capturing the narcissist megalomania characteristic of the West’s ‘Century of the Self’.

[11] Bert Oliver, ‘When “Psychopathic” is No Exaggeration’, Brownstone.org 22 January 2024.

[12] Brandon Smith, ‘The NWO Religion: How the Woke Postmodern “Faith” Glorifies Evil’, Alt-Market.us 17 April 2025.

[13] François du Cluzel, ‘Cognitive Warfare’, Innovationhub-actorg 2020, p. 5.

[14] Craig Murray, ‘This Hell’, The Unz Review 9 April 2025.

[15] Aleksandr Dugin, ‘Dromocracy. Speed as Power’, Geopolitika.ru 18 October 2022.

[16] For the author’s cultural-historical analysis of the occult origins of Western Modernity, cf. Alexander Wolfheze, The Sunset of Tradition and the Origin of the Great War (Cambridge Scholars: Newcastle upon Tyne, 2018) 88-126.

[17] For the author’s eschatological analysis of the Gazacaust, cf. Wolfheze, Globus Horribilis, 554-70.

[18] For the author’s take on the ‘Jewish Question’, cf. Alexander Wolfheze, Rupes Nigra. An Archaeo-Futurist Countdown in Twelve Essays (Arktos: London, 2021) 247-78.

[19] Humaira Ahad, ‘Dark Abyss: How Israeli Settler Society Became a Sanctuary for Rapist, Pedophiles’, Presstv.ir 14 April 2025.

[20] For the author’s assessment of these phenomena, cf. podcast ‘Alexander Wolfheze on the Amsterdam Psy-Op’, Truth Jihad / Kevin Barrett, Unz.com 19 November 2024.

[21] For the author’s take on the ‘Islam Question’, cf. Wolfheze, Rupes Nigra, 373-88 and 431-44.

The Supreme Court Denies Balogh Certiorari Petition

By Glen Allen, Esq.

As I mentioned in my February 20, 2025 article on the Free Expression Foundation website, in February 2025 Fred Kelly and I filed a certiorari petition with the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Warren Balogh in the Balogh v. City of Charlottesville, et al. case.  Warren and Gregory Conte, as you will recall, had filed a pro se complaint in the federal court for the Western District of Virginia seeking redress for injuries the City of Charlottesville and its police department inflicted on them during the Unite the Right rally in August 2017.   Fred, Warren, and I filed the petition because we believed – and still believe – not only that the defendants’ conduct had been unconstitutionally partisan but that the case raised critically important issues regarding the proper role of the police to protect unpopular speech.  We knew the odds the Supreme Court would grant the petition were against us (the Court grants only about 1% of petitions) but we believed our odds were better than most petitions because of the important issues our case presented.  Above all, seeking Supreme Court review was the right and honorable step to take.

On April 7,  2025, the Supreme Court denied our petition.  The Court’s decision, although not surprising, is regrettable. The Court missed an opportunity to advance the cause of First Amendment protection for unpopular speech and to admonish the City of Charlottesville for taking sides against Warren and the other pro-monument protestors. The Court’s denial of our petition, however, has not altered FEF’s determination to uphold First Amendment principles even in the face of daunting challenges .

Warren Balogh wrote an eloquent substack article (Warren’s Substack, April 27, 2025) about his case.  He has given me permission to quote from it, and I do so below:

Mainstream media reporting on my lawsuit has mischaracterized it as me charging that the police failed to protect us from counter-demonstrators on August the 12th. This is not true. Everyone who attended the UTR rally knows we could have, and did, protect ourselves from violent anti-White extremists. In spite of the fact that the ranks of the counter-demonstrators included professional agitators, violent career criminals, armed thugs and activists with detailed plans to commit criminal mayhem and violence against UTR attendees, the fact is that even with police “standing down” to let them attack us, the vast majority of our people made it into the permitted rally area unharmed.

If police hadn’t intervened, we would’ve been able to hear the speakers and carry out our demonstration during the time permitted, and we likely all would’ve been able to leave the park in an orderly fashion and make it back to our vehicles without anyone getting killed or seriously injured. The problem with Charlottesville, and the reason for my lawsuit, was not principally that police failed to protect our side from the other side, but that police attacked our side and drove us into the other side. They dispersed our rally while failing to disperse the Antifa and BLM counter-demonstrators. In fact, the only place the dispersal order was enforced was inside the tiny confines of the park where we held the permit. Leftist counter-demonstrators were given the run of the streets by city authorities!

As I pointed out to [District Court] Judge Moon in one hearing, if the dispersal order had been enforced as “content and viewpoint neutral” (which is a very serious constitutional legal requirement), then why were hundreds of Antifa still marching around the streets in triumph nearly two hours later, when a frightened young man named James Fields—after plugging in GPS directions to take him back home to his mother in Ohio—accidentally turned down a street and found his vehicle under attack by an armed mob?

Moon’s dismissal of our suit, which was later upheld by the Fourth Circuit Court and reaffirmed by SCOTUS’s declining to review my petition, was based on some very specious interpretation and legal reasoning: that police and officials could not be held liable for acts while carrying out their duties (which doesn’t apply in constitutional matters), that we didn’t include enough particulars about certain defendants (more evidence would’ve come out in discovery, or became known after the complaint was filed). Normally, at the dismissal phase, plaintiffs are to be assumed to have the facts on their side, and this is doubly true in a case of such constitutional import and public interest.

Incredibly, Moon’s court even asserted that peaceful, permitted rally-goers have no right to police protection from violent counter-demonstrators. In my appeal to the Fourth Circuit, one federal judge even asked defendants’ attorneys to clarify their argument that I would’ve had no right to expect police protection even if there was no violence from our side, and all the violence came from the other side. And yes, defendants’ attorneys affirmed it, that was their argument!

During my hearing with Judge Moon, I asked that if their position was that peaceful, non-violent, legal permit-holding demonstrators have no right to police protection from violent thugs who come to shut them down, then how are we supposed to exercise our First Amendment right to free speech and freedom of assembly? Neither Judge Moon, nor defendants’ attorneys, nor the three judges of the Fourth Circuit court, nor the SCOTUS were able to answer that question.

All I wanted is a blueprint on how we can exercise our rights.

If the burden is on us to defend ourselves, then so be it, but let the courts affirm we have the right to defend ourselves. This right was explicitly denied to us by the aftermath of UTR, however. As with James Fields, or the half-dozen or so men who went to prison for defending themselves in the anarchic clashes after the police broke up our rally, we are told we have no right to police protection—but also that we have no right to protect ourselves.

That this makes certain types of protest de facto illegal in the United States should be obvious to everyone. . . .

I am very proud to have waged this legal battle for as long as I could. I’m proud that all my filings and the permanent legal record will stand for all time as documents setting out a factual account of what happened. I’m proud that my children and hopefully my grandchildren and great-grandchildren will one day be able to see how I took the right side in the most important fight of our lives. I’m proud that I was able to wage this battle with a minimum of resources and that I was able to tie up countless enemy attorneys and many, many times the resources I spent in making these corrupt, rotten people defend themselves and their actions. I’m proud my name will be forever associated with this fight.

We should always fight for our rights. As I’ve often said, we need to either force this democracy to work, or make them shut democracy down so hard, it will be obvious to all that it’s an illegitimate sham. . . .

I want to thank Glen Allen and Fred Kelly of the Free Expression Foundation. The original complaint was filed pro se, but I never could’ve appealed it to the Fourth Circuit or petitioned the Supreme Court without their help. They are some of the last honest attorneys in America, and some of the only ones who have any courage. I also want to thank Greg Conte, my original co-plaintiff, and Augustus Invictus, who helped prepare the original draft of the complaint . . . .

I want to thank all those who donated and privately chipped in with legal costs. I never wanted this lawsuit to take away funds from those who were waging their own very critical defensive battles against the Sines v. Kessler suits, or trying to stay out of prison, but thanks to the volunteer work of many men we were able to keep going for a tiny fraction of what a suit like this would normally cost. In this country founded “by lawyers, for lawyers,” the process is often the punishment, the rich and powerful have a decisive advantage and openly brag about using so-called lawfare against their political enemies. But this lawsuit shows how a committed and honest group of men can crowdsource a legal battle that is truly David vs Goliath in proportions.

Lastly I would like to thank every last man and woman who attended the Unite the Right rally on August 11-12th, 2017. This lawsuit was a symbolic fight for all the young men who sacrificed more at Charlottesville than I did: all those who spent years in prison, who had their careers or reputations destroyed, who ended their own lives, who still have the threat of imprisonment hanging over their heads. For all their sakes, it was worth it.

Ukrainian identity and the coming Khokholodomor

An English couple, an American couple and a Ukrainian couple were dining in a high-end restaurant. The Englishman asks his wife: “Could you pass me the honey, honey?” A little later, the American asks his wife: “Could you pass me the sugar, sugar?” Upon seeing this, the Ukrainian says to his wife: “Pass me the bacon, you pig.”

The above joke is recited by the Ukrainians themselves, in jestful awareness of east-meets-west stereotypes. This essay is a short and unauthorized biography of the modern Ukrainian people, their mentality and some of their divergent traits. As such, it should be a corroborating conclusion to my earlier pieces on the history and ethnomorphosis of the early Slavs to Kievan-Rus and the Ukrainian state. As is often said in the East: Доверяй, но проверяй [Trust, but verify].

This contemporary foray into Ukrainian identity begins in the place that I think will provide readers with a relatable context — the Ukrainian diaspora in the United States. This population has contributed to America’s intellectual and social elite in quite remarkable proportions. Roughly 1.4 million Americans have Ukrainian ancestry compared with 2.5 million of Russian ancestry, though you wouldn’t know it from their respective share of eminent individuals. Perhaps the best explanation for this is that the Stalinist purges, forced collectivization and NKVD terror disproportionately befell Ukrainians post-World War II, rendering these surviving emigres the residue of a significant fitness filter.

Two prominent American Jewish intellectuals have Ukrainian roots — Noam Chomsky is fairly well known in this regard but the posthumously influential Milton Friedman is less so (on account of his Ashkenazi surname). Chomsky’s tempered analysis of the Ukraine war now sees even him branded a Putin Apologist. Chomsky was a college freshman during World War II, born before Martin Luther King Jr., but is still around to provide his awful recommendations of Yugoslav socialism and covid-19 police-statism.

The Biden administration had a tryzub of Jewish-Ukrainian appointees to prominent cabinet positions — Antony Blinken, Merrick Garland and Janet Yellen — though on the Hill there’s no shortage of those who might require yellow-and-blue-badging. Senator minority leader Chuck Schumer’s ancestors hailed from Western Ukraine while fellow anti-Trump Democrats Alexander and Eugene Vindman were born in Soviet Ukraine. The late Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s Jewish-Ukrainian roots managed to counterbalance Elena Kagan’s Russian-Jewish roots on the Supreme Court, whereas, contrary to popular belief, the war-hawk and vulture Victoria Nuland has no ties to Ukraine.

Pop culture and the arts are where the Ukrainian diaspora has reached prodigious levels of overrepresentation. A number of comedians who got their start in the Borscht belt of Jewish resorts in upstate New York ended up becoming Hollywood royalty like Mel Brooks, Jerry Lewis, Sid Caesar and Don Rickles. Jewish-Ukrainian-Americans also led the more conventional path to the silver screen, from method-acting pioneer Lee Strasberg to the classically trained Walter Matthau. It’s a tradition that never really ceased, considering the industry’s modern heavyweights like William Shatner, Dustin Hoffman, Adam Sandler, Steven Seagal, Peggy Segal, David Duchovny, Mila Kunis, Liev Schreiber and Seth Rogan. The somewhat camouflaged origins of director Steven Spielberg lie not in his namesake town in Austria, but in Western Ukraine. Even among Jews, the Ukrainians are overrepresented.

Among entertainers of varying levels of Ukrainian-Jewish admixture one finds Bob Dylan, David Copperfield, Alex Trebek, Barbara Streisand, Sylvester Stallone, John Stewart, Michael Bolton, Bruno Mars, Chris Jericho and Winona Ryder. Famous voice-actor from the Simpsons, Hank Azaria, is perhaps worth mentioning on account of being Sephardic Jewish while possessing a surname that signifies Khazarian-Jewish roots.

Andy Warhol, considered the most important American artist of the twentieth century on account of his revolutionary obscenity and pop art industrialization, belonged to the obscure minority group called Rusyns or Ruthenians whose language and culture are not recognized by Ukraine as separate. Michael Smerconish also descends from this semi-ethnicity, as did the paleoconservative virtuoso Joseph Sobran. Since the abode of the Rusyn highlanders left them straddled at the confluence of several Carpathian states, they are in a way the borderland of the borderland, and, frankly speaking, seem to have elevated levels of borderline personality disorder.

In the course of researching the general character of career engagements and civil entanglements of the Ukrainian diaspora, one facet that becomes almost immediately salient is the profusion of eccentricity, weirdness and even antisocial disposition. Libertarian and former candidate for president Gary Johnson (maternally Ukrainian) is on the milder side of this spectrum, while at the extreme end one finds the late Anton LaVey, who founded the Church of Satan in spite of having Jewish Ukrainian roots (Levey).

Some neural divergence may be an asset for artistic pursuits; alas for the Ukrainians it seems to bleed lymphatically into their craft and in their casting appointments. Author Chuck Palahniuk, famous for Fight Club, is a homosexual like Warhol who went on to publish highly questionable adult material under the pretense of being avant-garde.

In addition to Shatner, the cast of Star Trek included Leonard Nimoy as the iconically strange and detached Spock. Both of his parents came from Western Ukraine. Actor Marty Feldman was providentially cast as Igor in Young Frankenstein on account of his famously misaligned eyes, and only by chance did his Jewish-Ukrainian heritage match the character’s. Mary Shelly never included such a character in the original story. However later adaptations were inspired by the notoriety of Soviet scientific experimentation. The irony of such an operating theatre in current times is that Switzerland is where the living go to die and Ukraine is the failed experiment. As it happens, the man most responsible for the death of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachov, was originally from Ukraine and his surname means hunch-backed.

My own experience in dealing with Ukrainians and Russians is that tempers can be fickle, and there is a general elevation in cynicism and irritability. Relations can be warm and breezy until such a time that contact is suddenly severed, not because you have wronged them but because of a difference of opinion, at which point they no longer wish to breathe the same air as you.

In anticipation that such anecdotal observations might produce a strong allergenic reaction among the gallery of commentators, I checked what little empirical research is available. A 2007 study published in the Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology included Ukraine among 56 countries surveyed for the Big Five Personality Traits. Scores were abnormal for three of the five. They were very low on Openness, with only Japan and Hong Kong lower. They were among the most introverted in Europe (France and Belgium scored lower but this was likely a language issue). Most tellingly, they ranked dead last on Agreeableness.

Suspecting more closeted divergences than data were readily available for, I then happened upon some interesting anecdotal evidence from historical accounts of masochism in the Slavic lands. The Russian Primary Chronicle, penned in Kiev in the 12th century, relates a much older account of the Apostle Andrew’s visitation to the Novgorod Slavs:

I noticed their wooden bathhouses. They warm them to extreme heat, then undress, and after anointing themselves with an acid liquid, they take young branches and lash their bodies. They actually lash themselves so violently that they barely escape alive. Then they drench themselves with cold water, and thus are revived. They think nothing of doing this every day, and though tormented by none, they actually inflict such voluntary torture upon themselves. — Russian Primary Chronicle

It may not be such a coincidence that the term masochism actually derives from the name of a half-Ukrainian half-Austrian writer: Leopold von Sacher-Masoch. Born in Lemberg [Lviv] in 1836, Sacher-Masoch was somewhat traumatized as a child, having witnessed police brutality and interrogation at the station his father was chief of. The Ukrainian mammy who raised him also had a profound influence. Though he moved to Austria as a teenager, his political works made it clear that he hated both the German language and German society, preferring the French language and the quaint Galician homeland that he was nostalgic for. His fictional works, inspired from his private life, revealed that he enjoyed humiliation and intense physical pain administered by his mistress. For these reasons psychiatrist Richard von Krafft-Ebing coined the term masochist, to Sacher-Masoch’s vocal opposition, but possibly also his secret indulgence.

Notwithstanding the heightened artistic and creativity apparent in Ukrainian cognition, natives excel in the rational and computational fields. According to IQ data, Ukraine ranks near the lower end of Europe (90), more than six points below Russia, however these figures may require adjustment. The country is an IT powerhouse—ranking highly in coding competitions, hosting R&D centers of tech giants, and developing startups like GitLab, Grammarly and cryptocurrency services.

Over the last ten chess Olympiads, Ukraine has outperformed Russia, a long-time superpower in the sport. One of the veterans of the game is Vasyl Ivanchuk, a top player for decades and fan favorite on account of his authentic aloofness. In a recent event he burst into tears after a tough loss. The second strangest character on tour is fellow Ukrainian Anton Korobov, whose unique look and unfiltered way of communicating charms fans.

After Ukrainians and Russians, one can scarcely find people as direct in their apprehensions and laconic in their exchanges. This has its benefits and drawbacks, but in times of war gets to be harrowing. A year into the conflict and with large numbers of casualties mounting, prime-time Russian propagandist Vladimir Solovyov told viewers “life is highly overrated” anyway. More recently, a commander was filmed giving new soldiers a motivational speech in which he told them they were “all going to die” but that “flowers would be brought to all of their headstones for centuries.”

Ukrainian culture is considerably less Spartan, albeit in some ways more mafia-like, considering the recruitment of soldiers-by-abduction drive, the death (liquidation?) of writer Gonzalo Lira, seen as pro-Russian, and the extensive weaponry racketeering. Moreover, Ukraine has embarked on the kind of nationalist extremism and ethnic chauvinism that Russia could never afford to do given its plethora of minorities and semi-autonomous regions. I recall seeing this intolerance indoctrinated into children even on the national stage. Around 2012, a now deleted clip from Ukraine’s Got Talent showed six-year-old Diana Kozakevich reciting poetry and speaking on the need to linguistically de-Russify certain segments of the population. There can be little doubt as to which side disrupted the country’s homeostasis with a foolhardy attempt at cultural hegemony.

In addition to a certain cultural immodesty, one of the divergent traits of the Eastern Slavs appears to be a reduced ability at coping with excess and addiction, related to low-trust behaviors like kleptomania and megalomania. Reading Dostoevsky’s Brothers Karamazov, I was surprised just how much of the story reverberated around vice. It does, however, provide a backdrop to the grotesque materialism of some modern Russians and Ukrainians—the women often being worse—be it in London, Tel Aviv or Dubai. President Putin hasn’t exactly helped in this regard, saying in 2017 that “our [Russian prostitutes] are undoubtedly the best in the world.”

One need only look at the sight of the Russian president, solo at an immensely long table, to know that this is a man addicted to power. The Zelenskys, by contrast, have a coffee-table significantly more cluttered, but whatever the vice there is as always an ironic analogue from the pages of history. The man whose name both presidents carry, Volodymyr the Great, was one of the most vice-filled men of all time. The German chronicler Thietmar of Merseburg appointed him the Latin epithet “fornicator immensis” prior his miraculous conversion to Christianity and subsequent canonization:

He had three hundred concubines at Vyshgorod, three hundred at Belgorod, and two hundred at Berestovo. He was insatiable in vice. He even seduced married women and violated young girls, for he was a libertine like Solomon. —Russian Primary Chronicle

“It’s good to be the king,” as Mel Brooks famously said. Centuries later Christian mystic Rasputin found another way to live the lifestyle and follow in the footsteps of Saint Volodymyr, barefooted as was his style. Older and more conservative Russians no doubt look to the church-going Putin as a force for traditional mores and necessary authoritarian rule, protecting them from their own ancestral weaknesses, be they from pagan times or the recent communist-atheist epoch.

Ukrainians who moved to Russia decades ago complain of not being able to recognize their home country anymore, such has the profusion of American values altered the behavior and attitudes of the people. Therefore the ongoing conflict is understood as a culture war in addition to a geopolitical one. Among some of the harbingers is the influx of diversity and mixed marriages. One of the first Afro-Ukrainian marriages was personally blessed by then president of Ukraine Viktor Yushchenko, although the couple separated after their first child. The country’s current top female athlete, Elina Svitolina, is wedded to Caribbean-French tennis player Gaël Monfils.

Though most wouldn’t know it, American celebrity Kendra Wilkinson is half-Ukrainian—not that it had anything to do with being pimped by the polite society of Hugh Hefner’s Playboy brand. There is little doubt as to why she was heavily promoted with her own cable TV spin-off after her engagement to NFL star Hank Baskett. In her youth, Wilkinson wanted to be a marine biologist, but instead ended up a self-pitying “mud shark” as the racialists would say—an epithet that has completely changed meaning since Frank Zappa’s 1971 song of the same name.

The argument that Ukraine, a socially tolerant country, harbors a resurgent Nazi movement beyond football hooligans and army-patch enthusiasts is a silly notion but the Russians are sticking to it since the global propaganda economy is silly enough to buy it. Both Ukrainians and Russians effectively practice the proposition nation, as these respective identities are more about language and culture, thus making them available to anyone who wants them from the many and growing gradations of Eurasian pedigrees. The resolution of race in the East is quite different from that of the United States, where racial clustering involved large degrees of separation. Similarly, Western Europeans historically understood nation as a subtaxon of race. My own take is that it’s somewhat inverted in Eastern Europe, where national identities are monoethnic syntheses of multiracial components.

An onomastic analysis of Ukrainian surnames reveals the predominance of classic Slavic suffixes like -—enko and —ich, however there is also a large minority (perhaps 20%) who have the —ak or —uk suffix of Turkic grammar. This was a hallmark of titular names like Cossack, Kulak, Hayduk and Mamluk, as well as of personal names of the Huns (Mundiuk, Ernak, Dengezikh); Bolgars (Asparuk, Omurtak) and Cuman Khans (Atrok, Tegak, Konchak). Since tribes and nations acquired their names through a similar process, the majority of Turkic ethnonyms follow this rule: Uzbek, Kazakh, Tajik, Kalmyk, Kipchak, Patzinak (Pecheneg) and the ancient Türük (Turk). Modern surnames often have the suffix hidden in the middle because assimilation at some point truncated them with Slavic suffixes (cf. Yanukovych, Kubrakov, Karjakin, Nabokov).

Slavic contact with the Turks occurred so long ago that the linguistic appendage in question is common to all Slavic tongues and only weakly correlated with Turkic familial lineage. Among the Western Slavs, it was adopted as a diminutive early on and underwent a vowel shift, giving us such names as that of economist Friedrich Hayek and philosopher Slavoj Žižek. However, Slovenia in the previous decade had a most peculiar succession of presidents when, in 2012, incumbent Danilo Türk was followed by Borut Pahor—whose name is indeed a local variant of Borat. Other first names of Turkic provenance that Eastern Europeans continue to dispense in general ignorance include Boris, Denis, Taras, Boyan and Damir [Temur].

One of the standouts of the distribution of Ukrainian surnames is the high frequency of color anthroponyms, in particular for the color black: Chernenko, Chorniy, Chervan, Chervinsky, Cernovich, Korobov, Khara, etc. What this shows is that black-haired and swarthy phenotypes were exotic to the region, such that the pre-existing majority named dark traits as new and distinguishing features. The writers of antiquity only mentioned fair-haired nations inhabiting Pontic-Caspian region, though my earlier summary of these sources could have also mentioned the Albani, a white-haired race, described by Isigonus of Nicaea (1st century BC), Gaius Solinus (3rd century) and Isidor of Seville (6th century).

The incursion of black phenotypes can therefore be attributed to three main groups: Greeks, Gypsies and Turco-Mongols. If the alleles for black hair were amplified in a heterogeneous setting, it was because of sexual selection. Professor Edward Dutton explains that in a sibling group darker hair is associated with higher testosterone, elevating apparent physical fitness, although women are unable to decouple this from race. It’s probably not down to chance that most of the Soviet Union’s arch villains had black hair: Trotsky, Stalin, Yagoda, Beria, Yezhov and the “Black Tornado’ Lazar Kaganovich.

The only other aspect of East Slavic HBD perhaps worth noting is the range of body builds and craniometrics. The tall and gracile type is most common, which is why Ukrainian athletes dominate disciplines like high jump and pole vault, while at the other end a profusion of extremely thick-set ectomorphs is present. For this reason Eastern Europeans have dominated weightlifting—combining the Caucusoid qualities of strength and stature with the Altaic traits of burliness and lower center of gravity. Large torsos and short legs were ideal for horse warfare. As to the bulbous, pumpkin-like crania of Eurasian provenance, I can only imagine that that’s what Jordanes referred to in the 6th century when describing the heads of the Huns as “a sort of shapeless lump.” We now understand that ancestries tracing back to the Turco-Mongoloid homeland of Siberia naturally evolved skulls of minimal profile and maximum volume to surface area ratio so as to better conserve heat in extreme cold.

Omeljan Pritsak (1919–2006): Ukrainian-born Harvard Professor of Slavistics and Oriental Studies

My own experience travelling to Western Ukraine last year is that the population is virtually indistinguishable from that of Prague or Ljubljana, and not much like the ambiguous types I had seen profiled by Western media outlets during coverage of the war. It then dawned on me that the individuals included in those reports were fleeing the Eastern regions of Ukraine where the frontline is. It’s reasonable to assume that in Ukraine there is a West to East cline in Eurasian physiognomy, with the Dnieper historically functioning as a significant barrier to gene flow. Some media bias isn’t out of the question, but for the most part the Eastern part of the country appears to host a fantastic array of combinatory phenotypes that one is unlikely to see anywhere else.


Eastern Ukrainians featured by the BBC

From the city of Donetsk hails one particular individual who has a gleaming aura about him that accompanies his status as Ukraine’s richest man and one of the richest in Europe. There cannot be many blond-haired blue-eyed Muslim Tatars around but Rinat Akhmetov is one of them. That seems to be the extent of his Europeanness, because everything else from his mafia-enforcer past to shady business dealings are very much of the Eastern tradition. Akhmetov entered politics in 2006 but didn’t show up for 529 out of 530 parliamentary sessions. Readers can rest assured that he is indeed for helping the common man: he managed to get his former chauffeur elected to parliament alongside himself.

The number one reason to continue backing Ukraine, we are constantly told, is that this is “a war between autocracies and democracies.” But Ukraine isn’t a good advertisement for democracy. Per capita GDP of $5,500 and unemployment at 9.4 percent ranks much worse than Russia, while even “Europe’s last dictatorship” Belarus was ranked as less corrupt than Ukraine over the last decade. Transparency International, which runs the Corruption Perceptions Index, flipped the two country’s ranks only last year. For Ukrainians to be inspired by their sense of Western values rather than anti-Russian fervor will make for a sobering realization in their postbellum reflections.

In my lifetime, all that Ukraine has been known for is Chernobyl, parliamentary brawls, and the place that David Duke got his doctorate from. The stigma of war will saddle whatever rump state remains for decades to come—but who wants an identity mired in victimhood and potentially guilty victimhood? Even in staunch ally Poland, sentiments are changing. My own sympathies have changed too, after being reminded that 73 percent of Ukrainian voters chose Zelensky. But the people also vote with their feet, and a quarter of the population has left—including 3 million to Russia. Ukraine is now sustained by the charity of Western interests, while internally this democracy is considering drafting women and 18-year-olds. Perhaps Ukrainians are starting to realize that they’re not mere victims simply “fighting against aggression,” but that their side was the aggression—geopolitically (on behalf of NATO) and culturally (clamping down on language rights and Orthodox churches). All this for a European Union that meddles in foreign elections, and will one day request that Ukraine elevate the minority rights of gays, and trans, while inundating them with Muslims and Africans. The 16thcentury prophesy of Moscow as the third and final Rome doesn’t look so obscure now, but what is often forgotten about Rome’s founding myth is that Romulus killed his twin-brother Remus. So it has come to pass with Moskal and Khokhol.

Biden’s Senility and His Fully Deep-State Presidency

Sometimes I have to pinch myself to accept that what happened in the United States — in the nation that leads the free world — between 2020 and today actually occurred. It is clear from the new book — Original Sin: President Biden’s Decline, Its Cover Up and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again — that even the authors of this seminal analysis of the period cannot quite accept what took place. As the authors themselves admit, the cognitive dissonance is simply too strong.

If you are a Democrat, you want to believe that the Democrats are morally good. You want to believe that you are intelligent that you and cannot be easily manipulated or tricked. You want to believe that the U.S. is a genuine democracy and that its president — your Democrat president — is a good and competent man. You want to believe that people in high office will “do the right thing” and abide by the U.S. Constitution.

This book proves that, in relation to Joe Biden, none of these beliefs were ever justified. Democrats had clear evidence that Biden was senile and incapable of being president but they were gas-lit into thinking otherwise or they forced themselves to believe otherwise in order to cope with the cognitive dissonance. And in some cases, they knew the truth but didn’t care. In 2021, in the first year of his administration, Biden did not take a cognitive examination, patently because his aids knew what the result would be. The book quotes an anonymous source in this regard, who tries to justify the deceit: “He just had to win and then he could disappear for four years — he’d only have to show proof of life once in a while.” Apparently, “His aides could pick up the slack.” It’s as though they’re Soviet apparatchiks after the death of Brezhnev. “We’re in serious trouble,” they think. “We need a decrepit old man whom we can control. Interestingly, the authors refer to Biden’s court as the “politburo.” Hence it’s no accident that Biden’s presidency has been called “The First Fully Deep-State Presidency.” So when it comes to assessing blame for the Biden Administration’s open-borders policy, it should fall squarely on Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas, not Biden.

Shockingly, even the authors of this book cannot accept the reasonable conclusion that can be drawn from the evidence they’ve presented; that Biden had dementia all along. They write: “Readers who are convinced that Joe Biden was little more than a husk from the very beginning of his presidency, barely capable of stringing two sentences together, will not find support for that view here,” while they add that the book will not satisfy those who wish to believe that rumours of Biden’s deterioration was simple “right-wing propaganda.”

However, the first position is a straw man version of what many people actually think. Of course, Biden’s dementia worsened between 2020 and June 2024, when his disastrous debate performance with Trump led to Biden being eventually pressured to pull out of the race. But the point is that he was already senile, and thus incapable of taking the oath of office, let alone actually functioning as president, when he was elected in 2020.

In 2007, when Biden wasn’t yet vice-president, the signs of the beginnings of senility — forgetting words, getting mixed up — were already there, with Biden hilariously referring to Obama as “the first mainstream African American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy.” Ten years later, in 2017, when Biden commissioned a ghost writer to pen his autobiography, his conversations were taped. These tapes reveal that “He grasped to remember things, he sometimes had difficulty speaking, and he frequently lost his train of thought.” When the authorities looked into prosecuting Biden for mishandling classified documents, they effectively realised that the jury would likely conclude that he was a senile old man who didn’t mean to do anything wrong.

Accordingly, the conclusion that this book daren’t quite reach is that the Democrats, knowing that Biden was senile but thinking that they might be able to convincingly cover it up, did indeed put “Sleepy Joe” up as a “husk” candidate whom they could control, in a way that they obviously couldn’t with someone mentally competent such as Bernie Sanders. However, the Democrat machine did not anticipate just how quickly Biden’s mental acuity would completely collapse nor how difficult it would be to conceal this.

At the presidential debate with Trump in June 2024, no amount of nonsense about Biden having an “off-day” could obscure what everybody witnessed, so the old man had to go. Even then they couldn’t publically admit that he was senile; there were merely euphemisms about his age. But the lying gets worse. This book was published on May 20, 2025. On the same day it was revealed that Biden is suffering from advanced prostate cancer. This is a man who, as president, would have been having regular medical checks. It seems almost conceivable, therefore, that Biden’s aids didn’t know he had prostate cancer. But they covered it up.

The book points out that there have been many cover-ups with regard to the health of senior U.S. politicians, including presidents: Woodrow Wilson had a stroke in 1919 which left him incapacitated until 1921; John F. Kennedy simply lied about his Addison’s disease, and there is suspicious absence of photos of President Roosevelt dancing. However, the Biden cover-up occurred in the age of mass media and the internet. It involved not just lying to but gas-lighting people; attempting to make them think that their own eyes were deceiving them. Moreover, it clearly took place for nakedly partisan reasons: to have a marionette presidential candidate via whom Machiavellian manipulators could get Trump out of the White House.

There are many fascinating asides in this book. There is evidence that emotional trauma, such as losing your spouse, can speed up dementia. In this regard, the book notes that the death of Beau, Joe Biden’s son, in 2015 may have exacerbated symptoms that were already beginning. The stress caused by the behaviour of Beau’s prodigal brother Hunter would have further contributed to Biden’s decline. Biden’s wife Jill comes across as attention-seeking, devious and, gradually, increasingly the power behind her husband’s throne. At first she is reluctant to be in the limelight but she obviously learns to enjoy it and then finds that she can’t give it up. She is an American Lady Macbeth, ruthlessly ensuring that her husband — in this case, her sick and unsuitable-for-the-job husband — retains the presidency. And, of course, the book is replete with anecdotes about the extent of Biden’s senility while in office.

But it is not just in the U.S. where this kind of cover-up and gas-lighting is occurring, in a context in which it is easier than ever to obtain information. At the time of writing, the rumours about U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer being a homosexual — that he has a “lavender marriage” with a “beard” — are being further evidenced to be true by.

The British media dare not connect the dots. Prince Harry has essentially revealed that the King has terminal cancer, yet the pliant media says nothing, acting just like Pravda. Putting a senile and dying man into the highest office is what they were doing shortly before the Soviet Union collapsed. It really does make one muse over the future of the Woke Deep State.

 

Review: Bombshell patriotic documentary makes waves

Review in The Noticer: Bombshell patriotic documentary makes waves

Reposted here with permission

Earlier this year a group of patriots peacefully marched in Adelaide singing Waltzing Matilda on Australia Day – only to be shut down and arrested by the police. On the same day, there was an anti-Australia, antiwhite rally being held with chants of “Death to Australia” deemed perfectly legal.

The march made national news but the media was very dishonest about what happened and framed the peaceful Australian nationalists as terrorists, while those who were openly enemies of this nation were protected and celebrated.

Now the nationalists involved have released a documentary that tells their side of the story and contains some bombshell new revelations.

Watch the full documentary here:

Historically, nationalist and alternative media has always been very hit and miss on a technical level. Whether that be live streams with bad audio, or roughly edited documentaries often crudely cobbled together from archival material. So, we really didn’t know what to expect with this one.

Immediately, the film opens up with confident cutting and use of counterpunctal music. This wasn’t going to be framed as a depressing pity-party, but rather a jovial celebration of what it means to stand up and fight for one’s nation. Young men are dragged to the ground by police to an up-beat acoustic guitar melody. A montage of physical action and plot points express a uniquely Australian sense of humour.

How are men able to be so unfazed after such violence and injustice from the police and legal system? The documentary is structured in such a way to explain this. Thomas Sewell, who humorously describes himself to the camera as “the self appointed leader of White Australia” sends his boys on a ten kilometre run, only to then be followed by a mixed martial arts tournament on the same day. So this is a hardened group of young men ready to take on anything. An action-packed sequence of kickboxing peaks the first act before the film’s heroic mission begins.

From here we follow the group as they assemble on Australia Day, intercut with South Australia Police at a press conference expressing their intent to use the full force of the law and shut down any celebration of Australia Day that the patriots had in mind. The boys then assemble around a war memorial, singing Waltzing Matilda, which is intercut with historical footage of Australian troops marching and singing the same song in WW2, followed by Sewell attempting to give a speech before the police intervene and drag him away into a white van.

This is quite significant because of what is revealed in the closing credits of the film. After Sewell was taken into custody, a microphone he had been wearing picked up two officers talking about shooting the nationalist activists. From The Noticer:

In the recording, one officer appears to check whether his colleague’s bodycam was operating by asking “are you rolling?” and replies “okay good” after the second officer says “no”.

“I’m happy to shoot them,” the first cop then says.

“Happy to?” the second asks.

“I’m happy to shoot them,” the first officer repeats as voices can be heard singing Waltzing Matilda in the background.

“I wanna hammer these cunts. These guys… just need to be shot.”

It’s a revelation that puts everything in context. The regime is anti-Australian and the destruction of Australia is not some mistake or mismanagement – it’s by design and on-target.

We all remember the violence of tyrannical police during the Covid lockdowns. Police forces now have labour shortages that they struggle to fill because to be a policeman is to be a traitor to your own people. The nation was founded and built on the White Australia Policy and therefore the current power structure is opposed to the nation’s heritage, foundation and what it truly means to be Australian. It’s also funny that this film has bigger newsworthy bombshells than an entire 45-minute hit-piece attempt from earlier this year by ABC’s Four Corners.

The film is very well put together. Even with some haphazardly shot footage, it has a very refined edit that pushes this material to its full potential. There are various stylistic flourishes that keep it engaging. Joel Davis makes a rousing speech that is edited with electronic music and clever use of jump cutting to make it a rhythmic sequence. This incorporates meme-video language into a more traditional documentary, which I think was very effective and forward-thinking.

The film is obviously a propaganda piece for this nationalist group and it does a good job at showing the scope of the organisation. They were able to stage seminars with various speakers, physical marathons and kickboxing tournaments, followed by dominating the new cycle with an effective protest that exposed the anti-White regime that runs this country.

Arguments about optics and self-censorship are destroyed by Joel Davis’s seminar talk. He explains how leftists don’t run to the centre ground but keep marching left, which drags the centre of acceptable discourse with them. Joel argues it’s time to march in the other direction and drag the country right. This means being unapologetically right-wing and no more compromises. And when packaged in such a well-made documentary, which doesn’t pull its own punches, it’s hard to argue with Joel’s strategy.

The main thing I want to express about the filmmaking is how tight this edit is. Normally when watching something like this, I would expect to write down notes for edit changes and suggestions, but I really have none to give. This is as tight as a bow. It goes from deeply felt, back to humorous relief, to insight, to revelation without ever getting bogged down. Intuitive musical choices progress its narrative and emotion. Stylistic editing techniques create variation between the different sequences. Multiple elements are interwoven and cross-cut to create juxtaposition and a third entity.

Looking at this film, I believe they would have been editing from shortly after Australia Day right up until its premiere. And some credit should be given to the camera work. They had very good coverage, I’m sure some of this would have been shot on phones but that gave it dynamism and freshness. You can’t edit what you haven’t shot. The lack of sit-down interviews gave this a tactile, ever-moving quality that transcends the stagnation of Four Corners’ bigger budgeted yet inferior film.

The structure is great, with an amazing series of emotional crescendos culminating in a message from a WW2 widow who expresses pride in the men and donates $9,000 to assist political prisoner Stephen Wells. In fact, the combination of this and revelations that police openly expressed a desire to shoot these men may have led to Friday’s dropping of false charges and release of Wells, who was held in solitary confinement for four months. Wells was slapped with phony politically motivated charges of “fail to cease loiter”, and “display Nazi symbol” for a patch on his sleeve. But rather than sign bail conditions that would prevent him communicating with his comrades, he stood by his principles and in the process exposed the justice system as corrupt. His suffering was not in vain.

My only real criticism with the documentary is the title of the film. I understand it’s kind of staunch to just call it “Summer Nationals”, which I assume is in reference to the name of the event they are attending, like how the Scouts might have a “Winter Jamboree”, but something more targeted and attention grabbing would have served the film better.

There are various nationalist activist groups in the West who have produced their own media. I think it’s fair to say this documentary is a bit of a milestone and inspiration going forward in terms of video production. At its heart, this is an incredibly Australian film and made for a domestic audience that shares its sense of humour and cultural understanding. But international audiences will still get plenty from the patriotic spirit and bravery depicted in the film.

This is something every Australian should see. Not just every nationalist or patriot – but every Australian including radical leftists and foreigners. They will at least gain a better understanding of Australian nationalism and how the police treat political enemies. The left has had a pretty free-run with their protests for years, but the recent crack-down on anti-war and anti-Zionist rallies regarding genocide in Gaza has made a film like this more relevant to everyone. Many leftists are waking up not just to Zionism but global Jewish plutocracy and the penny is dropping. The simplistic days of left/right are over. The patriots shown in this film are arguably more socialist than the Greens. They just want things done in the national interest.

From Red Diaper to Red State: The Political Odyssey of David Horowitz

David Horowitz’s death on April 29, 2025 closes the chapter on a figure who embodied the neoconservative phenomenon: a Jewish intellectual who, like many of his generation, abandoned the Left when he perceived its ideals as incompatible with Jewish interests and American security.

Horowitz was born on January 10, 1939, in Forest Hills, Queens, New York, to Phil and Blanche Horowitz, both Jewish high school teachers and committed members of the Communist Party USA. His father taught English, and his mother taught stenography. Horowitz’s family background deeply shaped his early political outlook — his mother’s family had emigrated from Imperial Russia in the mid-19th century, while his father’s family fled Russia in 1905 during pogroms. In 1940, the family moved to the Long Island City section of Queens.

Growing up in a staunchly communist household, Horowitz was the quintessential “red diaper baby.” He attended Columbia University, where he earned his Bachelor of Arts degree in 1959, and later received a master’s degree in English literature from the University of California, Berkeley.

After completing his graduate studies, Horowitz moved to London in the mid-1960s to work for the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation. There, he became involved in anti-war activism, helping to form the Vietnam Solidarity Campaign in 1966 alongside members of the Trotskyist International Marxist Group. During this period, he wrote The Free World Colossus: A Critique of American Foreign Policy in the Cold War, establishing himself as a voice in the New Left movement.

Horowitz returned to the United States in January 1968 and became co-editor of Ramparts magazine, an influential publication of the New Left based in California. During the early 1970s, he developed a close friendship with Huey P. Newton, founder of the Black Panther Party. Horowitz assisted the Panthers with their community initiatives, including raising funds for a school for “disadvantaged” children in Oakland.

The turning point in Horowitz’s political journey came in December 1974, when Betty Van Patter, a bookkeeper whom Horowitz had recommended to work for the Black Panthers, was found murdered in San Francisco Bay. Her body had been severely beaten, and Horowitz became convinced that members of the Black Panther Party were responsible for her death.

This tragedy profoundly traumatized Horowitz. According to Hugh Pearson, author of Shadow of the Panther: Huey Newton and the Price of Black Power in America, Horowitz “totally went berserk with regard to the left-liberal community” following Van Patter’s murder. The incident shattered his belief in the moral righteousness of the radical left and catalyzed his political transformation.

Increasingly disillusioned with left-wing politics through the late 1970s and early 1980s, Horowitz underwent a gradual but decisive shift to the right. In 1985, he publicly announced that he had voted for Ronald Reagan in the previous year’s presidential election. Along with his writing partner Peter Collier, Horowitz published an essay in The Washington Post titled “Lefties for Reagan,” formally declaring their break with the left. They wrote that voting for Reagan was “way of finally saying goodbye to all that… to the self-aggrandizing romance with corrupt Third Worldism; to the casual indulgence of Soviet totalitarianism; to the hypocritical and self-dramatizing anti- Americanism which is the New Left’s bequest to mainstream politics.”

Following his political conversion, Horowitz dedicated himself to challenging what he saw as the dangerous influence of the left in American culture and politics. In 1988, he founded the Center for the Study of Popular Culture (CSPC) in Los Angeles, which aimed to “establish a conservative presence in Hollywood and show how popular culture had become a political battleground.” The organization was later renamed the David Horowitz Freedom Center (DHFC) in 2006.

Horowitz chronicled his ideological journey in his 1996 memoir Radical Son: A Generational Odyssey, which became one of his most significant works. This deeply personal account detailed his disillusionment with the left and his embrace of conservative principles. It was quoted by Kevin MacDonald in Chapter 3 of The Culture of Critique illustrating the point that leftist Jews remained committed, ethnocentric Jews despite their declared internationalism:

David Horowitz (1997, 42) describes the world of his parents who had joined a “shul” run by the CPUSA in which Jewish holidays were given a political interpretation. Psychologically these people might as well have been in eighteenth-century Poland:

What my parents had done in joining the Communist Party and moving to Sunnyside was to return to the ghetto. There was the same shared private language, the same hermetically sealed universe, the same dual posturing revealing one face to the outer world and another to the tribe. More importantly, there was the same conviction of being marked for persecution and specially ordained, the sense of moral superiority toward the stronger and more numerous goyim outside. And there was the same fear of expulsion for heretical thoughts, which was the fear that riveted the chosen to the faith.

One of Horowitz’s primary focuses as a conservative activist was challenging what he perceived as liberal bias in American universities. He published The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America in 2006, criticizing professors he believed were engaging in indoctrination rather than education. He also created the “Academic Bill of Rights,” aimed at eliminating political bias in university hiring and grading practices.

Horowitz organized numerous campaigns on college campuses, including “Islamofascism Awareness Week” in 2007, which sought to alert students about what he viewed as the threat posed by radical Islam. These events often generated controversy and resistance from students and faculty.

After the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, Horowitz’s activism took on a new dimension. He became increasingly focused on what he called “the efforts of the radical left and its Islamist allies to destroy American values.” Horowitz pushed the envelope by advocating for racial and ethnic profiling of “potential terrorists-and that does mean Islamic and Palestinian terrorists.” He likely would have loved The Heritage Foundation’s Project Esther.

Horowitz, much like many of his peers in the largely Jewish neoconservative movement, was deeply affected by the 1967 Six-Day War and unsettled by the anti-Israeli rhetoric of Black nationalist groups in the 1960s and 1970s, steering him toward a strong pro-Israeli position. Though Horowitz publicly maintained that he was not a hardcore Zionist, his tendency to defend Israel at every opportunity suggests a deep alignment. In fact, he once argued, “If the Arabs disarm there will be peace, if the Jews disarm there will be a massacre,” contradicting his statement about being a lukewarm Zionist.

His stance on Israel became particularly pronounced after 9/11, as he increasingly claimed to view criticism of Israel as part of a broader anti-Western agenda. Horowitz became a fierce critic of Democrats who he claimed “empowered” Israel’s enemies, including “Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah, ISIS and Hamas.” In 2016, he published a controversial essay in Breitbart News accusing conservative Jewish writer William Kristol and other “Never Trumpers” of trying “to weaken the only party that stands between the Jews and their annihilation, and between America and the forces intent on destroying her.” Kevin MacDonald in VDARE (2016):

One of the more spectacular examples of an MSM frenzy over supposed anti-Semitism: the reaction to the attack by David Horowitz against his fellow Jew Bill Kristolleader of a campaign to destroy Donald Trump [Bill Kristol: Republican Spoiler, Renegade JewMay 15, 2016] The headline, written by Horowitz, alluded to Kristol being Jewish.

As Jonathan S. Tobin [Email him] notes in Commentary,

[T]he real offense here is … his attempt to wrap him in the Star of David and to somehow brand his opponents as traitors to the pro-Israel cause. …

[H]is invocation of “America First” and the use of a term like “renegade Jew” in the headline (though not in the text of the article) seems to echo the smears of the pro-Trump alt right racists who have attacked conservative critics of the candidate with an avalanche of anti-Semitic invective.

[Breitbart’s ‘Renegade Jew’ DisgraceMay 16, 2016]

Horowitz’s offense was not simply criticizing Kristol’s campaign against Trump. Lots of people have done that without incurring the wrath of Commentary. And even saying that Kristol’s views are not good for Jews and Israel is commonplace:  MondoweissJ Street, and Mearsheimer and Walt in The Israel Lobby argue that neoconservatives and the Israel Lobby have a tragically mistaken view of Jewish and Israeli interests—also discussed in Charles Bloch’s and Steve Sailer’s VDARE posts.

The unforgivable offense: implying Kristol’s being a Jew had something to do with his opposition to Trump. After all, there would have been exactly zero upset if instead the headline was “Bill Kristol: Republican Spoiler, Renegade Republican.”

But putting ‘Jew’ in the headline was guaranteed to bring out immediate charges of anti-Semitism by the likes of Michelle Goldberg [Email her] in Slate :

To define someone as a ‘Renegade Jew’ in a column about scheming elites written for an audience full of white nationalists is to signal to the sewers. … A narrative is taking shape, an American Dolchstoßlegende that will blame a potential Trump loss on conniving Semites.

[Breitbart Calls Trump Foe “Renegade Jew.” This Is How Anti-Semitism Goes MainstreamMay 16, 2016]

Of course, we are supposed to engage in the fiction that the opinions of Bill Kristol et al. have nothing to do with being Jewish or what is good for Israel, but everything to do with their perception of what is good for America.

David Horowitz’s life trajectory from dedicated Marxist to conservative firebrand encapsulates much of the ideological turbulence of the latter half of the twentieth century and early twenty-first century. His dramatic political conversion, sparked by personal trauma and disillusionment, led him to become one of the most vocal critics of the movement he once championed.

However, Horowitz’s political career should not be viewed through an ideologically reductionist lens.  Mike Peinovich of The Right Stuff aptly observed that Horowitz was first and foremost a Jewish ethnic strategist with a history of changing his political positions to align with what he perceived as Jewish interests. And Jared Taylor pointed out Horowitz’s hypocrisy on identity politics:

Mr. Horowitz is simply wrong when he writes of “going back to the good old American ideal” of multi-racialism. I am certain that if all the prominent Americans I have quoted could rise from their graves, they would endorse the American Renaissance view of race and nation, and would be shocked at the idea of a multi-hued America in which we are to pretend race can be made not to matter. It is American Renaissance that is faithful to the original vision of America. Walt Whitman perhaps put it most succinctly when he wrote, “[I]s not America for the Whites? And is it not better so?” Yes, it is.

Mr. Horowitz deplores the idea that “we are all prisoners of identity politics,” implying that race and ethnicity are trivial matters we must work to overcome. But if that is so, why does the home page of FrontPageMag carry a perpetual appeal for contributions to “David’s Defense of Israel Campaign”? Why Israel rather than, say, Kurdistan or Tibet or Euskadi or Chechnya? Because Mr. Horowitz is Jewish. His commitment to Israel is an expression of precisely the kind of particularist identity he would deny to me and to other racially-conscious whites. He passionately supports a self-consciously Jewish state but calls it “surrendering to the multicultural miasma” when I work to return to a self-consciously white America. He supports an explicitly ethnic identity for Israel but says American must not be allowed to have one.

Not long before he was assassinated, Yitzhak Rabin told U.S. News and World Report that as Prime Minister of Israel he had worked to achieve many things, but what he cared about most was that Israel remain at least 90 percent Jewish. He recognized that the character of Israel would change in fundamental-and to him unacceptable-ways if the non-Jewish population increased beyond a small minority. Equally obviously, the character of the United States is changing as non-whites arrive in large numbers.

Throughout most of its history, white Americans took the Rabin view: that their country had a distinctly racial and ethnic core that was to be preserved at all costs. When Mr. Horowitz writes about the “good old American ideal,” that is what he should have in mind, not a historically inaccurate view that drapes a radical new course with trappings of false tradition.

Horowitz was a foundational figure in neoconservatism, but not as a defender of Western Civilization as some of his supporters like Turning Point founder Charlie Kirk have made him out to be. At the end of the day, Horowitz was an opportunist who shifted political stripes to serve Jewish and Israeli interests.
The way conservatives now praise him is unsettling, but it reveals a harsh truth: their movement owes its current form to him and his cadre of ex-Trotskyist Jews, who effectively turned American conservatism into a vehicle for Zionism. Horowitz’s lifework reveals that any nationalist movement lacking strong gatekeeping against Jewish influence is vulnerable to being co-opted and redirected to serve the interests of world Jewry much to the detriment of White interests.

E. Michael Jones on Identity

There seems no reason to question E. Michael Jones’ sincerity. By current standards, he is brave, courteous, and he is willing to debate anyone. Few commentators have such a comprehensive understanding of the threats posed by Jewish supremacism, and fewer still discuss the issues in such an articulate and engaging way.

The problem arises with his understanding of identity as a means of resisting and eventually reforming Jewish-dominated power structures. To begin with, identity is a slippery concept. Identity can be imposed externally or constructed from within, and it can be based on immutable human traits, ideology, behavior, and any number of other factors. Identity can also be fleeting. Catholics can become atheists and vice versa. It should also be noted that people need not be schizophrenic to simultaneously hold multiple, and even conflicting identities.

It might be easier to simply discard the notion of identity when discussing solutions to Jewish supremacism. This would be a bad idea for the following reason. Jews have steadily increased their international dominance precisely because they identify as Jews. Jewish identity cannot be defined according to language spoken, religious practices observed, or even physical characteristics. Yet Jews create networks and collaborate based largely on identity. It follows that any movement that is to successfully counter Jewish power will need to develop its own identity or form some sort of coalition of existing identities. Given Jewish skillfulness at infiltration and divide-and-conquer strategies, one or two unified identities may achieve greater success in resisting Jewish power than a smattering of well-informed interest groups.

Jones argues that Catholicism is the only identity suited to this endeavor. His arguments in favor of Catholicism and against White identity are that 1) Whiteness is an artificially constructed identity; 2) individuals must decide upon whether they identify as White or Catholic because they can’t be both; 3) Catholicism affords critics of Jewish behavior a layer of protection against Jewish persecution.

Jones argues that Whiteness was imposed as an identity upon European indentured servants who provided labor in the Virginia colonies. The term ‘White’ was assigned to the European workers as a divide-and-conquer tactic, giving them a relatively higher status than the African slaves next to whom they toiled. Although this initial White identity may have been artificial, it has little bearing on current day Americans and, for example, Australians whose ancestors came from Europe.

Jones describes himself as bi-racial, meaning that he is German and Irish. This description may have resonated with denizens of American White ethnic neighborhoods prior to the ethnic cleansing of those neighborhoods in the 1960s. At present, however, most Americans who appear White have ancestors whose origins lie in disparate parts of Europe. It is therefore natural that, if they identify themselves according to race, they might say that they’re White rather than providing a (possibly inaccurate) list of the regions from which their ancestors came. This, incidentally, applies both to Whites who are proud of having European heritage and those who are ashamed of it. Perhaps if America were a White only country, no one would identify as White. If it were White only but still dominated by a tiny Jewish minority, its citizens might identify as gentiles. We have no way of knowing. What is important is that Whiteness is not a ‘category of the mind’ as Jones would have us believe. It is a category of reality simply because White people know who they are and can recognize each other—and because it is rooted in the evolutionary trajectory of the European peoples. To the extent that it is important, non-Whites can also recognize us as White, usually not as Irish or German or Italian, but as White. It is therefore irrelevant whether Whiteness is only 500 years old—as Jones asserts—or more than 20,000 years old.

There is little doubt that language and culture play an important role in identity, but languages, cultural practices, and cultural perspectives can be learned. Jones may describe himself as half German, but he acquired his knowledge of the German language and culture because he lived in Germany as an adult. He was not born German, but he was born White.

Jones claims that White identity is a trap set by Jewish interests and that Americans (and presumably other Whites) who identify as White are internalizing the commands of their oppressors. On this point, he is partially correct. Among some White nationalists, there is a tendency to view all non-Whites with disdain or hostility. Naturally, this might hamper universal efforts to combat Jewish supremacism. Whites are not the only adversely affected group. Arguably, meaningful change will not happen without the type of multi-cultural coalition that is incompatible with ardent White identitarianism.

But at some point, the issue of whether Whites are internalizing the commands of their oppressors becomes irrelevant. Prior to arriving on American shores, Blacks would have identified themselves as Fulani or Mandingo or any number of other ethnicities. None of these identities would have been useful to the American Black Power Movement of the 1960s, however. People can argue about the movement’s propriety, but there can be little doubt that it resulted in an increase in Black power. In the long run, Whites may have no choice but to identify as White, particularly in areas where they are outnumbered by hostile non-Whites and have no option to relocate. If, on the other hand, White identity can be normalized sooner rather than later, Jewish efforts at ethnic cleansing will become less successful and most Whites can look forward to a more secure future.

Before the Modern Period, most Western people’s identity was fixed at birth. These identities encompassed religion, sex, locale, language, vocation, social status, and so on. Urbanization and its concomitant social and geographic mobility have left a vacuum and people in industrialized countries, if they even contemplate identity, construct their own identities. In part due in part to Jewish denigration of Whiteness, many White Americans manufacture for themselves frivolous identities determined by their sexual practices, or the brand of motorcycle they favor, or the music they listen to. Jones argues that Catholic identity affords some protection against persecution by Jews. Certainly, in the past the Church often effectively prohibited predatory Jewish practices like usury. But with the rise of the nation-state and globalism, the Church has neither the power nor the will to dismantle Jewish power networks. If every White American were to convert to Catholicism tomorrow, there would still be a staggering amount of consciousness raising to do. A direct development of White identity based on recognition of collective White interests, and a shared understanding of how these interests are threatened, seems the most effective approach.

This is not to say that the Catholic Church and other churches have no role to play. Networks of White advocacy should build strength and legitimacy in all institutions. Jones’ assertion, however, that Catholicism is incompatible with White identity makes little sense. Scholars universally accept that people hold multiple and often conflicting identities. The issue of whether Catholic Church doctrine discourages White identity can be left to the Magisterium, but surely White identitarians won’t be excommunicated based on thought crime.

Many Whites now recognize and resent the ethnic cleansing, wealth extraction, denigration in academia and the popular culture, perversion of history, and other assaults their people have been subjected to. They also understand the source of these assaults. Jones may be correct that the Catholic Church provides protection. Moving forward, however, we shouldn’t need protection when we point out lying, cheating and stealing. It has yet to happen, but the time must come when the perpetrators are shamed for their behavior rather than truthtellers shamed for antisemitism.