Eine Rezension von „Warum die Deutschen? Warum die Juden?” — Teil 1

/1 Comment/in /by

A Review of “Why the Germans? Why the Jews?” — Part 1, originally published on January 19, 2016.

Eine Rezension von „Warum die Deutschen? Warum die Juden?”
von Götz Aly

  1. Januar 2016

Die Kultur des Holocaust ist dabei, Deutschland zu zerstören. Von Intellektuellen und Medienelite über Jahrzehnte immer und immer wieder bekräftigt, hat das Konzept, dass Deutsche und ihre Nachkommen verantwortlich sind für „ein einzigartiges Verbrechen in der Geschichte der Menschheit“ einen derart demoralisierenden Effekt gehabt, dass Millionen voll und ganz Angela Merkels gegenwärtigen Versuch unterstützen, die ethnische Basis ihrer Nation zu zerstören. Überall im Westen wurde die Kultur des Holocaust mit verheerenden Folgen dafür genutzt, jede Opposition gegen die von der jüdischen Diaspora verfolgte Strategie einer massiven nicht-weißen Einwanderung und des Multikulturalismus zu unterdrücken. „Der Holocaust” ist der Dreh- und Angelpunkt der Agenda zur Verdrängung der Weißen, wobei jeder Hinweis auf rassische oder ethnische Identifikation oder Solidarität in Europa in den Hirnen von Millionen – wahrscheinlich Milliarden – Menschen sofort mit Auschwitz und dessen vermeintlichem Grauen in Verbindung gebracht wird. Read more

Black and Hispanic Democrats versus White, Liberal Democrats

/101 Comments/in /by
Lots of White faces at a Bernie rally

Lots of White faces at a Bernie rally

With all the attention on Donald Trump, there has been little discussion of the astonishing rift between Black and Hispanic Democrats on one hand and White liberal Democrats on the other.

Hillary Clinton has shut Bernie Sanders out of the Black and Brown voters. She is their candidate. She is catering to them to an astonishing degree. She has endorsed all the fantasies and lies about White cops killing Black males. She has hauled the mother of Travon Martin around, putting her on the stage to endorse her candidacy, and talking about how Lil’ Travon was murdered by George Zimmerman but there was no justice. She has extolled the Gentle Giant. She made statements about a breaking story about three Black coeds who claimed they were attacked by Whites on a bus who called them “nigger.” When a surveillance video from the bus revealed that the whole story was concocted, Hillary refused to retract her statements or to apologize for joining in false accusations against innocent people.

There is no limit in race-betrayal that Clinton will not go to. Read more

Could It Happen Here?

/108 Comments/in , , /by

This essay is based on a speech given at NPI’s 2016 winter conference, Identity Politics; first posted at Radix.

The Donald Trump phenomenon is amazing. I’ve never seen such enthusiasm for a politician—ever. His rallies are overflowing with emotion. This scares a lot of people because it conjures up images of populism, and even fascism. There’s something about crowds of cheering White people that terrifies America’s elites, especially when the speaker is criticizing their long-standing immigration policies.

We have become inured to an arrangement in which major party candidates are vetted by the media and the donor class before being put up for election. It’s a top-down system that more resembles an oligarchy than a democracy. Donald Trump has not been vetted.

Trump has said some incredible things—things I never thought I would hear from a politician with a real chance to win it all: birthright citizenship, Mexican criminality, a moratorium on admitting Muslims, an immigration policy that meets the needs of Americans, to name but a few. Without Trump in the GOP field, we’d be choosing between candidates’ methods of balancing the budget.

For years, the system has been stacked against our movement, to put it mildly. We have been doing our best to figure out how to get our issues before the public—issues like immigration and the demographic transformation of the United States. We ask: How could it happen? How could a political movement arise that would ignite the imaginations of White America, depose the corrupt donor class in the Republican Party and the corrupt politicians in Congress, and generate a populist uprising among those Peter Brimelow calls the “historic American nation”?

Read more

Commentaire sur “La Culture de Critique” dans Fédération de Québécois Souche

/in /by

From:  Fédération de Québécois Souche

Nous ne croyons pas exagérer en qualifiant l’ouvrage The Culture of critique le livre à l’impact potentiel le plus grand publié ces dernières années, peut-être même de notre vivant. Le monde occidental a changé durant le 20ème siècle de façon dramatique et accélérée avec les années 60, où s’accomplit une révolution culturelle qui a complètement inversé les valeurs traditionnelles occidentales. Ce qui est devenu la norme aujourd’hui était inacceptable dans les années 50 et inversement, ce que nombre de politiciens disaient à cette époque serait aujourd’hui passible d’anathème et même d’emprisonnement dans ces pays dotés de lois contre le discours haineux. Que s’est-il donc passé ? C’est ce dont traite The Culture of critique.

L’auteur, le Professeur Kevin MacDonald, est chercheur en psychologie à l’Université d’État de Californie, à Long Beach. Il s’intéresse aux principaux mouvements subversifs du siècle dernier et décrit comment des Juifs ont toujours été l’élément nécessaire à leur existence et comment ils agirent en poursuivant des objectifs importants dans l’intérêt réel ou perçu de leur peuple. Le sens général de cet intérêt peut être résumé ainsi: le judaïsme constitue la religion d’un peuple uni par une grande stratégie de survie, qui consiste à vivre parmi les autres tout en demeurant génétiquement séparés. Pour éviter le rejet naturel des groupes humains basés sur la proximité génétique envers les éléments étrangers présents sur leur territoire, les Juifs tendent à favoriser l’effritement de la solidarité communautaire des nations hôtes dans lesquelles ils s’installent, mais tout en favorisant pour eux-mêmes une intense solidarité communautaire.

 

Read more

Jewish Influence and Ethnic Networking in France: In Their Own Words . . .

/31 Comments/in , , /by

It is often difficult for ordinary people to understand how small groups can achieve such a preponderant influence in the life of a country. But such influence should not be surprising: Modern societies have a highly complex division of labor leading to enormous power asymmetries, with huge amounts of power being concentrated in the hands of the tiny elites making up the media, top oligarchs, and the political class—as the Donald Trump candidacy in the United States is bringing into stark relief.

This is a world of chummy networks and mutual back-scratching, one where even small ethnocentric elite networks can have a decisive impact. And, concerning Jewish ethnic networks, I have documented extensively (e.g., here) that they are massively overrepresented among French elites, that they are completely intolerant of criticism of Jewish power and ethnocentrism, and are equally intolerant of French ethno-nationalism. As further evidence, I present in this article a number of interesting statements, mostly from Jews, taken from Paul-Éric Blanrue’s books on Jewish power networks.

Even sympathetic observers have commented upon Jewish power even during the earliest years of the Fifth Republic in the 1960s. The famous Jewish anthropologist Claude Lévi-Strauss denounced in private the fact that Jewish media influence and bias were distorting coverage of the Israeli-Arab conflict. Lévy-Strauss went so far as to defend and repeat President Charles de Gaulle’s comments following the Six Day War that Jews were “an elite people, self-confident and dominating.”[1] Lévi-Strauss wrote to the Jewish liberal intellectual Raymond Aron on April 9, 1968:

Certain Jewish elements in France, taking advantage of their control over print or audiovisual media and of acquired positions, and arrogating to themselves the right to speak in the name of all the others, showed themselves to be “self-confident and dominating” [. . .]. From the first hour, we witnessed a systematic attempt to manipulate public opinion in this country. Remember France-Soir headlining on the entire page: “The Egyptians Attacked,” and this continued long after the Six Day War. [2]

Read more