Rhonda Garelick and the Jewish Hatred of Aryan Beauty

Rhonda Garelick, an English professor at the University of Nebraska, has a comment on John Galliano’s outburst in a Paris bar (“High Fascism“; NYtimes,  3-7-2011). Garelick can’t resist finding Galliano’s behavior symptomatic of fascist/Aryan tendencies deeply rooted in French culture—despite the fact that Galliano was fired and now faces persecution for uttering a racial insult. (Of course, one might argue that these recent events simply indicate the triumph of the culture of critique in post-WWII Europe.) The French are evil because during the German occupation, French women continued to dress fashionably:

“Every woman in Paris is a living propaganda poster, the universal function of the Frenchwoman is to remain chic,” wrote one fashion journalist in the early 1940s. “Frenchwomen are the repositories of chic, because this inheritance is inscribed in their race,” wrote another.

That’s not the worst of it:

And as Vichy continued to toe the Nazi line about Aryan physical fitness, more French fashion magazines began focusing on exercise and diet for women.

Ah, the horrors of National Socialism, encouraging women to eat well and be physically fit. Read more

Judith Coplon–and why the Venona Project was stopped

A generation of adults has now arisen which never experienced the dreadful certainty felt by those just a few years ahead of them (especially if they grew up in Europe): that ultimately Communism would win the Cold War.

Consequently they do not perhaps fully comprehend the iniquity of some of the actors in this drama. Such a one was Judith Coplon (Socolov) who died on February 26th.

Coplon was revealed by the Venona Project to be spying for the Russians. Because the authorities wanted to keep secret the fact they were able to read Russian cable traffic, her two convictions were able to be overturned on grounds of flawed procedure. She was never punished. The facts are well recounted here. Read more

Erasmus on Judaism and Islam

The Dutch monk Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam (1466-1536) is considered one of the greatest philosophers in Europe. He was a renowned scholar and was entrusted with the education of Charles V, the future German Emperor, King of Spain and Sicily, and Lord of the Low Countries. There are numerous respectable institutions named after him, like the University in Rotterdam, and he is hailed for his supposed ‘cosmopolitism’ and ‘tolerance’ in an age of religious conflict. Looking closer at his writings, there appears another Erasmus, which is neither multicultural nor tolerant.

Contra Johannes Reuchlin

Was Erasmus really an ardent defender of religious freedom and civil rights for all? In the beginning of the 16th century the dissident theologian Johannes Reuchlin was the light bearer advocating equal civil rights for Jews. Erasmus was not in favour of this: “I am no Reuchlinist… never have supported him, he would not even have wanted that” (Jonathan I. Israel, The Dutch Republiek 1477 – 1806, p.50).

It has been suggested by the Erasmus Center for Early Modern Studies that Erasmus’ aversion of Jews was caused by personal disputes against people he disliked: “Several anti-Jewish statements of Erasmus are known. Invariably, these are aimed at specific persons whom he disliked in particular. There is absolutely no evidence of any systematic or political-ideological hatred of the Jews — which we might, then, anachronistically term anti-semitism.” Read more

The Failures of Enoch Powell

The BBC documentary on Enoch Powell’s 1968 “rivers of blood” speech in Birmingham, currently featured on The Occidental Observer, reminds us of how White loyalism has been systematically defeated since the Second World War throughout the West (though with some recent exceptions in Switzerland, Denmark, Sweden, and even Britain). It also reminds us of the tragic failure of our elites to respond to prophetic, principled voices such as Powell’s.

Nevertheless I think Enoch Powell is an inappropriate role model for White activists. Read more

Yegor Gaidar: An Alternative Obituary

When Yegor Gaidar, who with Chubais administered the economic “shock treatment” to the Russian people, died a few months ago, American, Russian, and Jewish financial leaders all expressed their sincere regrets. The official obituaries were all laudatory of the man and his accomplishments, abiding by the traditional sentiment de mortuis nil nisi bonum. The following does not. The distain of the Russian people for Gaidar’s economic and financial policies in the 1990s and a preference for the sentiment veritas omnia vincit compelled alternate obituaries as, for example, the following:

Officially, Yegor Gaidar died unexpectedly on 16 December 2009 of pulmonary edema, provoked by myocardial isochemia, while writing a children’s book in his Moscow home. In November 2006 Gaidar had been found unconscious of an undetermined ailment in County Kildare, Ireland, where he was promoting his new book on economics. He claimed that opponents of the Russian government had poisoned him. Both President Medvedev and Prime Minister Putin honored the man and his works.

Unofficially, an alternate obituary, representing large segments of the opposition, states that Yegor Timurovich Gaidar died of acute alcoholism. The Russian people did not honor him; they loathed him. Under the tutelage of a team of bright young men from Harvard University, Gaidar in partnership with Anatoly Chubais (Director General of the Russian Corporation of Nanotechnologies – Rosnano) administered Jeffrey Sachs’ economic “shock therapy” to the people of the erstwhile Soviet Union. Government officials and bankers (almost all of whom were Jewish) became oligarchs overnight. Ordinary Russians lost whatever meager savings they had managed to accumulate under the Communist regime.

Yegor Gaidar’s acute alcoholism was not a secret to his colleagues, the alternate obituary reports. Boris Nemtsov, for example, once said that Gaidar downed a bottle of whiskey a day. He was drunk most of the time, alienated from his wife and his work. His uncontrolled drinking probably caused his collapse in Ireland. His colleagues in Russia and the West dutifully covered for him, hinting at a sinister poisoning. Another business associate, Petr Aven, President of the Alfa Bank, said that Gaidar began to show symptoms of decline long before his first visit to Ireland.

Nemtsov, this source reveals, half jokingly and half cynically suggested another approach to improve Yegor’s image among the people. He proposed that Yegor appear on Russian TV drinking heavily and munching on a hunk of dark bread so that the people could identify with him and perhaps grow to like him. After all, the Russian people are heavy drinkers and heavy drinking never discredited Boris Yeltsin and Winston Churchill. During the British intervention in 1918 Churchill preferred Armenian cognac. Both remain heroes to the Western democracies.

Chubais, Gaidar’s closest friend, hoped to divert attention from his friend’s alleged poisoning by proposing him for a Nobel Prize for having been a “savior of the motherland.” The idea was not entirely inappropriate, the alternate obit jokes, in that Gaidar’s policies probably did not result in as many deaths as did Nobel’s dynamite. Also, Chubais was concerned that Gaidar’s death might be linked to the injuries and deaths of Aleksandr Litvinenko, Viktor Yushchenko, and Anna Politkovskaya.

Historian Sergei V. Naumov (who is associated with the Don Cassocks All-Russian Orthodox Patriotic Organization “Black Hundred” whose program aims to revitalize Orthodoxy in Russia) suggests that Gaidar’s alcoholism was most probably hereditary by briefly tracing Yegor’s family history:

Yegor Gaidar’s grandmother, Rachel Lazarevna Solomyanskaya, who was married to Arkady Golikov (who wrote under the nom de plume Gaidar) already had a son Timur by an unknown father. Arkady Golikov adopted Timur, but he and Rachel did not live together for long because Golikov, who was mentally unstable and an alcoholic, used to chase Rachel around the apartment with his sabre in a kind of family pogrom. Rachel quickly dropped her famous writer husband and pogromist Arkady (Gaidar) Golikov and left Moscow with her son for far-off Archangel. They never saw each other again, but when Solomyanskaya was arrested in 1938, Arkady, being by then a famous author of children’s books arranged to free her.

Years later Arkady died in the war under unknown circumstances and son Timur eventually graduated from the Nakhimov School. The intelligent Jewish boy knew that with the obscure family name of Solomyansky it would be difficult to make a career. He chose not to take his mother’s name with which he had lived so long, or the family name of his natural father, or the name of his stepfather, but rather in a bold case of chutzpa took his stepfather’s nom de plume — Gaidar.

This bit of cleverness paid off. The son of Rachel Lazarevna was eventually made a rear admiral in the Soviet Navy without ever having commanded a ship. His naval service was spent as an editor on the Red Star newspaper. In the same way he became a member of the Union of Soviet Writers without ever having written a single artistic work. His son Yegor, the recently deceased Gaidar, therefore was born into the highest ranks of the Communist Party nomenclature. He dutifully worked in the offices of Pravda and the magazine Kommunist, on the pages of which he angrily exposed the evils of capitalist market economies. He was not then considered an economist.

When the Communist Party of the Soviet Union began to disintegrate, Yegor Timurovich Solomyansky-Golikov-Gaidar quickly reversed course and became an ardent apologist for all the evils of capitalism that he himself had earlier publicized. In his private life he remained a patriot of his people, marrying Maria, the daughter of the renowned Jewish writer Arkady Strugatsky. The offspring of this felicitous marriage, the liberal Masha, is the founder of the My (We), an anti-Putin “orange” movement.”

Thus, to clarify the genealogy: the beloved author of children’s stories was actually Arkady Golikov, a Russian, who assumed the nom de plume Arkady Gaidar. He married Rachel Solomyanskaya, a Jewish lady, and adopted her son Timur from a previous relationship. His real name should have been Timur Solomyanski, but he took the pen name Gaidar from his stepfather to enhance his career. It worked and Timur Gaidar eventually rose from being a Communist propagandist to become a rear admiral in the Soviet Navy. Consequently, Timur’s son Yegor Gaidar is not a blood relative of Arkady the famed author of children’s books. Yegor’s story shows in microcosm how so many non-Russians, through identity theft and name changing, have been passed off as Russian.

The life story of Yegor Gaidar may be seen as that of a typical present-day dissident Russian Jew. He was born into the comfortable higher ranks of the Communist Nomenklatura by virtue of his father having taken the famous name of Gaidar and parlaying it into the rank of admiral in the Soviet Navy. Both Yegor and his father routinely wrote for Communist newspapers and periodicals during the Soviet era, criticizing the capitalist world and glorifying the communists. Today his co-ethnics refer to him as the “savior of the motherland.” Oy vey!

Caveat: Dissidents must always be listened to, but care must be taken to ascertain whether dissidence is truly justified or simply a euphemism for political or personal gain.

Jewish Dissidents Target Putin

Yegor Gaidar

A recent article, A Hidden History of Evil, by Neocon writer Claire Berlinski in the reputable City Journal asserts that — for reasons unknown — the West has deliberately ignored revelations of crimes committed in the Russian Federation since Putin assumed power. Berlinski mentions especially two dissidents currently exiled in England, Pavel Stroilov and Vladimir Bukovsky. Bukovsky is well known for his exposé of the Soviet use of psychiatric hospitals to silence critics of the Communist regime, he himself having been so victimized for years before being exiled to England. Stroilov, on the other hand, belongs to the post-Soviet era and claims to be in possession of documents that put Putin and Gorbachev in a very unflattering, even despicable, light, but cannot elicit any interest in them on the part of Anglo-American government agencies. Both gentlemen are part of a far larger “Putin Must Go” movement with vocal supporters in Russia itself as well as in England and the United States. Read more

The (Corrupt) Multicultural Left Is Totally In Charge of the University

Typical day at the university. On the faculty email list for the entire College of Liberal Arts, an activist says we absolutely must petition the President for an LGBT Advisory Council (Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual, and Transgendered; I wasn’t sure what that last one meant, so here’s Wikipedia’s take for those unaccustomed to leftspeak). Campus liberals quickly indicate their public support by responding positively on the list, thereby earning their stripes with their colleagues and ensuring they will get tenure if they don’t have it and get to go to good parties if they do.  In addition to a great many individual faculty members, seven department chairs and two entire departments joined in the effort. No one was so bereft of all human feeling as to oppose such an initiative. So the President agreed to it and the Dean announced the decision on the list.

Victory!! What were the odds that something so deeply controversial in a contemporary university environment would be approved? Read more