If one wants to see what a huge segment of the American people have morphed into, look no farther than the ‘People of Walmart’ website. It features the obscenely unbecoming clothes that people wear while shopping at Walmart. The site is both hysterical and depressing at the same time. Though it pokes fun at sloppy Walmart shoppers, the truth is that vast numbers of Americans dress like this at any place they patronize. It’s often difficult at times to distinguish between a sloppy but employed person and a homeless bum. Some have called it “hobo-chic.”

It has become common in America to see someone wearing a hoodie, backward baseball cap, torn jeans, a ‘wife-beater,’ or their baggy pajamas to the grocery store, the DMV, or to the movies. Most people probably don’t even notice it anymore because it has become a regular feature of what Americans wear. A large sign had to be posted at the local courthouse where I live to remind visitors to wear shoes and that tank-tops are not allowed. Americans, it seems, are quite content in attiring themselves like complete slobs. They can’t be bothered to wear appropriate and form-fitting clothes. Comedian Bill Mahr was right when he said on his Real Time show in 2013 that Americans won’t be happy until they can go shopping in a diaper!

Mind you, I’m not against wearing casual clothing. But there is a time and place for everything. Few Americans seem to understand this. Some have surmised that the origins of our sloppy dressing habits began when companies started implementing “casual Friday’s” which turned into casual Monday-thru-Friday.

Turning to our women, far too many of them are not just frumpy in appearance, but they often dress in the most unbecoming ways – such as spandex so tight you can see the entirety of their butt cracks, the shape of their labia majora, including jiggling cellulite for all to behold. Every basic rule of fashion and clothing coordination is violated.

Many of them dress this way even though they are morbidly obese. You’d think they would naturally want to conceal their girth and draw as little attention to their rolls of fat as possible. But no, they persist in wearing clothes that only serve to accentuate it. Many of them, in fact, are quite proud of their rotund bodies. They’d go ballistic if anyone dared to “fat shame” them. We’re expected to not notice and consider it perfectly acceptable.

Look also how much makeup is caked onto their faces, especially among our younger women. There seems to be little understanding that sometimes less is more. Makeup, as I understand it, is supposed to enhance a woman’s natural beauty rather than make her look like someone completely different when she takes it off. Those guys who have been shocked to see their girlfriend without makeup know exactly what I’m referring to. The current trend among young women to affix enormous fake eyelashes has reached absurd levels.

Have you noticed also how sexual and provocative our young women dress? They leave nothing to the imagination. They tattoo themselves like an old bar whore, pierce their noses and other bodily parts, and then complain when men look at them or act too forward toward them. They attire themselves in ways that narcissistically scream “Hey everyone, look at me!” — and then self-righteously condemn anyone who dares to notice. There is nothing modest or graceful about these gals either. They’re loud, abrasive, and seemingly possess just as much testosterone as the average male they look down upon. They have no self-awareness. They think the world of themselves, but they have little reason to do so.

Much of this, I suspect, is due to our national decline which is reflective in how people attire themselves. But some of it must be due to the fault of their own mothers who failed to teach and model before them on how to conduct themselves in public, especially how to dress appropriately for each occasion. Just as so many American fathers have abdicated their role as leaders in the family, so also mothers have failed to instruct and guide their daughters on what it means to be a woman. The days when our women were known for being feminine, soft-spoken, and polite are over. The entire notion of behaving “classy” and “dignified” seems to have been kicked to the curb.

Whites Have Succumbed to the Degrading Fashion Trends of Blacks

What I find to be especially disturbing is how many of our young White men and women follow the fashion trends of Blacks. White males wearing their hat backwards might seem like a petty thing to complain about. Perhaps, but even in something as seemingly insignificant as this, it shows the degree of influence that Black ‘culture’ has had on our way of life.

White males didn’t do this sort of thing until around the late 80s or early 90s when Black ‘rap’ music took hold of the nation. It’s been downhill ever since. The backwards baseball cap thing popular among Black males is, in my view, indicative of them as a people. Everything they do is backwards. They are largely unwilling to assimilate to the norms of White civilization, and it shows in their attitudes, including at times in the smallest of ways. These are subtle acts of defiance by Blacks, a sort of “Fuck you!” to the White man and a declaration that “we’re different than you!” And, indeed, they are, but not quite in the superior way they imagine.

White males who allow their pants to “sag” like ghetto thugs reveal just how much White Americans have come under the power and influence of Blacks as amplified and promoted by our liberal-left media. I expect young Black males to wear their pants “saggin” because it’s indicative of their lower intelligence levels. Black communities in America, in fact, must create public “anti-saggin” campaigns to urge their young Black males to stop wearing their pants so low. What other racial group on this planet other than Blacks must erect large billboards and public service announcements to tell its young men to pull up their pants?

Few Whites are aware that the pants “sagging” fashion originated in America’s prisons in which Black males receptive to anal sex from other prisoners would allow their pants to sag below their buttocks. It serves as just one more gauge revealing how utterly dysfunctional Blacks in America are. Thus, when young White males emulate the same gutter fashion as young Black males, it’s a clear indication of how far Whites in America have fallen.

Our young White women, likewise, mimic the tribal dancing of Blacks which is overtly sexual in nature (“twerking”). The current trend among ghetto-influenced White gals of trying to grow gargantuan-sized buttocks (ala Kim Kardashian) in order to attract young Black bucks shows just how low our people have sunk.

Prior Generations of Whites Had Greater Self-Dignity

What a stark contrast all of this is to prior generations of White Americans. Consider the 1950s when America, according to some observers, was at its pinnacle in terms of national unity, civility, and morality. People used to dress up when they went shopping or even to the grocery store as strange as that may sound to our ears. It wasn’t rare to see men in the stands at a professional baseball game wearing suits and women wearing dresses. These were public events, and they dressed accordingly.

This wasn’t because they were snobs and thought themselves better than others. Rather, it was because they had respect for themselves as well as those around them. They lived in a high-trust, homogeneous society. There was a common consensus among most Americans on right and wrong, a love for their country and countrymen, and they maintained this national unity in everything they did. They were far from perfect, no doubt, but they had a level of civility and self-respect largely missing from today’s generation.

Few Americans in our time seem able to relate to this. We are a deeply divided nation (if we can even be called a “nation”?) and there is almost no consensus on anything. We have become individualistic to the core and care only what is best for me and mine. The racial and cultural changes that emerged during the 1960s — orchestrated and funded in large part by revolutionary Jews who felt no attachment to heritage Americans — ensured that the next generation and those after would be marked by racial division, the decline of the family, total demoralization of the White majority, and increasing instability.

Making matters worse, Americans have been badly influenced by Nihilism and Cultural Marxism which attacks the very foundations of tradition and beauty. Is it any wonder why our young people who come under the spell of Leftist thought, including the more recent ‘woke’ movement, are soon transformed into the most visually repugnant persons? It’s a sickness of the mind and soul, and it manifests itself in how they outwardly present themselves to the world.

The Inanity of Tattoos

Consider also the popularity of tattoos among Americans which has reached epic proportions. In the name of “art,” huge numbers of Americans tattoo the entirety of their arms (“sleeves”), tattoo the entirety of their necks and faces, and any body part that’s exposed. All of it, we’re told, is an expression of one’s individuality and uniqueness. It sets them apart from others.

In reality, it only serves to show how all of these folks are compliant sheep with little real individuality among them. They’re enslaved to mind-numbing trends even though they like to think of themselves as standing apart from the crowd. Seriously, how original is a “Tribal band” tattoo when almost every other person has one? I’m sure if they thought that wearing a watermelon rind on the top of their heads was popular and would give them attention, they’d do that too.

It would be one thing if the tattoos were something earned as a result of bravery and survival. But most of the tattoos that Americans graffiti themselves with have little meaning or significance. They do it because it looks “cool” and will get them noticed by others which is really their underlying purpose.

Whenever you see a young woman fully “tatted” out, know well that she’s practically guaranteed to be the proverbial “attention whore.” No one intentionally does this sort of thing unless they want people to notice and gawk at them. Any man who has an ounce of intelligence is advised to turn and run from these kinds of women.

The following analogy may help us to see the utter mindlessness of our women tatting themselves like Bantu tribesmen. Have you even seen a Ferrari or Lamborghini sports car plastered with bumper stickers? Of course not! That’s because these finely tuned cars are by themselves beautiful works of art. Nothing more is needed to make them beautiful or to stand out more. To attach anything like a bumper sticker to them would cheapen them immensely. It would be completely inappropriate to do so.

On the other hand, one might not mind attaching bumper stickers to their Toyota Celica sedan or their Ram diesel truck because these are not works of art and the quality of these vehicles are not on par with a Ferrari or Lamborghini. This isn’t to say that Toyota and Ram vehicles aren’t good vehicles, but only that their quality is vastly inferior compared to such finely tuned and expensive sports cars as a Ferrari Testarossa, Porsche Carrera GT, or a Lamborghini Veneno.

It seems from this commonsense analogy that the greater number of our American women view themselves as merely Toyotas (or worse!) which explains why they are so eager to mark up and graffiti their bodies. In other words, the woman who tattoos herself in the ways I have described probably has very low self-esteem. Sure, she might make highfalutin claims about herself (they always do), but I suspect that most of these women have “daddy issues” and an array of psychological disorders.

What is so disturbing is that White women are seen by much of the world as the standard of beauty. Why, then, would so many of them go out of their way to intentionally make themselves much less attractive? I can only attribute it to one thing — they have come under the spell of a poisonous and self-hating Leftist ideology. When a woman intentionally cuts off most of her God-given long hair, colors that same hair in bright neon colors, defaces herself with multiple inane tattoos, pierces her nose, and attires herself in the trashiest manner one can imagine, it’s a clear indication that her mind and soul are not well.

Is it any wonder why so many American men are turning to the much more feminine, trim, and less abrasive Asian and Russian women? I don’t necessarily support this kind of thing because I want Whites to marry and create families among their own kind (Russians are fine). But I understand why it’s occurring. American women have slowly driven themselves from the dating marketplace by their attitudes, conduct, obesity, and caustic nature. They have allowed themselves to be so badly duped by ultra-feminist  and trans rhetoric that they’ve become insufferable.        

Humans Are Wired to Make Judgments

Some are offended at these kinds of personal judgments of others. We’re supposed to be a polite society that doesn’t judge, right? Wrong! All of us judge, and most of us make them quickly upon meeting other people for the first time. Anyone who tells you that they don’t judge others is a liar and is virtue signaling.

The truth is, we’ve been hard wired to judge others. It’s simply a matter of recognizing patterns, learning from past mistakes, and having reality-based discernment which we are supposed to get better at as we get older. Many people don’t, and they’re just as gullible at 72 years of age as they were at 22. This is the value of having many experiences, both good and bad, in life. It makes us wiser and more cautious in all that we do – or at least it’s supposed to.

How Understanding Criminal Profiling Helps Us to Read People

When I was cop, it was drilled into us to not “racially profile.” This is right because we really don’t want cops stopping people on the roadway for no other reason than the color of their skin. But this doesn’t necessarily prevent cops from recognizing and finding a legitimate vehicle code violation in order to stop criminal gangsters on the roadway. It shouldn’t stop the beat cop who recognizes suspicious activity even if the persons are minorities. Why is that? It’s because cops are engaging in criminal profiling which is perfectly legal. This is quite different than racial profiling. Most people don’t understand this, and they wrongly view criminal profiling as no different than racial profiling.

Criminal profiling is based on repeated and observable patterns. In other words, when gangsters or other criminal types wear certain kinds of clothing, particularly colors such as blue and red, it fits a certain criminal profile that alerts the officer. It conveys important information to the officer. Based on this, the officer may find probable cause or reasonable suspicion to stop and contact the driver. This often leads to apprehending criminals who have warrants issued for their arrest, including probation violations which sends them immediately to jail.

Criminal profiling is based upon the millions of contacts officers throughout the country have had with gang members and hardened criminal types over the past many decades. As many people know, this was originally developed by the FBI years prior. They provided a framework in which to better understand the criminal mind, including distinctive patterns that help us to identify them. Some of these indicators are seen in how criminals attire themselves.

Yet, more than that, the patterns I refer to are innate within humans. They are part of our internal defense system that helps us to survive. Many people, unfortunately, ignore the signals our body gives us or refuse to develop and sharpen their skills at pattern recognition.

Hispanic gang members (“cholos”) as well as Black gang members (“crips” and “bloods”) dress a certain way that stands out from the rest of society. These are clear markers or indicators that this person is more than likely a criminal thug that an officer would be wise to pay attention to or find probable cause that would justify a stop or even a consensual encounter. Again, it’s a matter of recognizing repeatable patterns, and then making a judgment about the gathered information.

Part of understanding all of this is recognizing that no one puts on their daily clothes without thinking about it. None of it is accidental. Yes, there are persons who give little thought as to what they wear, but that doesn’t mean they wouldn’t care if they dressed up like a clown or a disheveled hobo. Most of us attire ourselves a certain way because this is how we want to portray ourselves to others. Our clothes, then, serve as a reflection of ourselves and what we want others to think of us. Thus, when a gang member attires himself in a thuggish way or anyone else for that matter, they are sending a message. They are signaling to others. They are portraying themselves, as well as messaging their values and worldview (however slight it may be).

Most people don’t think about it much, but this is what is occurring. A corporate professional for a large city bank, for example, would not think of wearing cowboy boots and a cowboy hat to work. He wouldn’t wear pajamas to the office either. He knows he has an image he wants to project, one that comports with his vocation and the policies of his company.

Thus, when Americans dress like slobs it’s a peek inside their little world. It tells us something about them (though not everything, of course). It may only be suggestive, but it still provides some insight into the person. It may tell us that he or she is lazy or economically poor. It might also reflect the downward spiral of the society they are a part of. It may be an indicator of their narcissism. It might suggest there’s been an erosion of decency in that society, a national decline of sorts.

All of these are possible, although I am inclined toward the view that overall it’s indicative of America’s fall. Would you want these people in our military? Running a corporation? How—on such a large scale—can it be otherwise when one compares the current generation with prior generations? None of this happened in a vacuum. None of it was accidental. There is good reason to believe it was planned despite how conspiratorial it may sound to some people.

After decades of daily and intense liberal-left indoctrination from the media and almost every government entity, how could it not impact the way we dress and carry ourselves? Beginning in elementary school, American children are incrementally propagandized to think and act a certain way. Their entire worldview is manipulated to interpret the world around them in ways that agree with a Leftist and corrosive mindset. This continues when our children enter high school. The final process of indoctrination occurs when they enter college. Like the compliant and childish ‘Eloi’ in The Time Machine (1960), they naively drink from the poisonous well of liberal and Marxist rhetoric they’re taught by their professors. They’re quite content with it. They don’t challenge it in the least. It isn’t long before these same young White students begin to hate their race, their country, as well as mock all that’s good and beautiful. And this, in turn, expresses itself in how they dress and present themselves to others. Contemporary Leftism, then, destroys and makes ugly all that’s in its path. It can do no other because this is the nature of the Beast.

We can be certain, too, that the more depraved our society becomes, the more absurd and insane will be our fashion trends. What young White woman in the 1950s would want to dress the way our women do today? What young White man in the 1950s would want to emulate the lowest fashions and degrading practices of Blacks? I suspect there would have been very few, if any.

Times have changed, and that not for the better. We have been feeling for decades the effects of the disastrous social and political changes that occurred beginning in the 1960s. One can see the downward progression by simply observing the clothing standards of each new decade. Current trends, sadly, indicate that it will only get worse.

A visual of what America has become

 

 

 

 

“Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”
-Interview with Theodore Dalrymple by Jamie Glazov, FrontPageMagazine.com, August 31, 2005

Ever since I saw this quote a few years ago, soon after the covid phenomenon began in 2020, it has haunted my perception of the Government/Media/Academia (GMA) Complex (if there exists a Military/Industrial Complex, there exists others, and GMA is one. They all join together in one Meta-Complex we might call the New World Order or Great Reset). This quote is troubling to consider, because it reveals that we in the U.S. live under a Communist GMA mind tyranny. Too few people understand this, believing Communist influence faded in the U.S. after WWII and especially after the “McCarthy Era” ending in the mid-50s.

No. Communism of course only expanded its influence and power after the National Socialists and Fascists lost to Communism in WWII (European Civil War 8B). The U.S. and Britain fought on the Communist side, having been infiltrated by Communists, many of them Jews. Communism expanded further after one of the only checks and limits on Communism in the U.S., Senator Joseph McCarthy through the Senate Sub-Committee on Permanent Investigations (not the House Un-American Activities Committee), was defamed and deposed.

This has led directly to our Neo-Communist domination today, and Dalrymple’s quote reveals it. It is a tremendous struggle for many Americans today to consider that we suffer under a Communist propaganda onslaught. So perhaps it helps to label it Neo-Communism, since it has morphed beyond class warfare into many other divisions, and has incorporated new oppressive technologies (both should be essays of their own). I have studied Communist strategies and influences in a number of books, such as Behind Communism by Frank L. Britton and The Naked Communist by W. Cleon Skousen. Many other sources can be cited addressing Communist propaganda as a culture weapon, but here we will examine Dalyrmple’s for its insights.

First we must examine Dalyrmple. He is half-Jewish through his mother, and his father was a “Communist businessman.” That is a significant tautology! His real name is Anthony Malcolm Daniels. Beware of Jews with Communist businessman fathers who change their names. Daniels/Dalrymple was a prison doctor and psychiatrist, and became a “conservative English cultural critic,” of all things. He is the author of at least 20 books between 2001 and 2015, and is the Dietrich Weismann Fellow at the Manhattan Institute.” (At least two of three “recent content” articles featured at the Manhattan Institute appear to be authored by Jews: Shapiro, and Goldberg & Kaufmann. In an apparent synchronicity, as I wrote this Professor MacDonald posted “Twitter feed from E.P. Kaufmann showing the effectiveness of propaganda on children,” on the very same day, referencing the same essay I saw on the Manhattan Institute site.)

Dietrich Weismann was a “Chairman for the Board of Trustees in the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research,” deceased 2015. Mission statement: “The Manhattan Institute is a think tank whose mission is to develop and disseminate new ideas that foster greater economic choice and individual responsibility.” The Board of Trustees is loaded with high-power Jews, such as Chairman Paul Singer (billionaire vulture fund manager, LGBT philanthropist, etc.), Maurice Greenberg (former executive at bankrupt AIG, friend of Henry Kissinger, former vice chairman of Council on Foreign Relations, member of Rockefeller Trilateral Commission, critic of Iranian President Ahmadinejad’s “holocaust denial,” etc.), Robert Rosenkranz (Chairman Delphi Capital Management, member CFR, etc.), and many other high-power Jews.

Dalrymple’s quote appears to warn us about the dangers of Communist propaganda, but we must consider that it may be part of the strategy of managing both sides of the mainstream political spectrum (like the rest of mainstream conservatives (including all the talking heads at FoxNews) the Manhattan Institute would never stand up for White interests or deal with the role of Jews in our dispossession); or it may be an example of the indoctrination/familiarization influence, what Michael Hoffman calls The Revelation of the Method (pp. 35–6). The latter is a dangerous stage of Communist propaganda where the techniques used against us are shown to us, when we have little power to resist. It instills deeper demoralization and subservience to Communist rule for us to know yet remain impotent. It shows their almost total confidence in their power over us. Orwell’s 1984 should be considered not a cautionary tale or a warning of a near-future Communist dystopia, but perhaps a Revelation of the Method, indoctrinating us to being more likely to passively accept having read Orwell. He was after all embedded in a Trotskyite unit fighting on the Communist side of the Spanish Civil War.

Dalrymple may be the same. He says, “the purpose of Communist propaganda was … to humiliate. … The less it corresponded to reality, the better.” We have many examples to consider today, such as Critical Race Theory demonizing Whites in a campaign of “anti-racism,” “diversity is our strength” as migrant violent crime decimates the White population, gender reassignment surgery for children declared “gender affirming care,” and closing schools, bankrupting businesses, denying right to assemble, and mass injection (often under extreme pressure of loss of employment) of an under-tested experimental high-tech substance that does not meet the legal or medical definition of traditional vaccines will rescue public health and help us “build back better.” Dalrymple’s quote explains a great deal in our society that would be otherwise not just baffling, but maddening.

Jews play an overwhelming role in afflicting this humiliating propaganda upon the U.S. population, just as Jews played an overwhelming role in Communism historically. And they use their very prominent position in the GMA Complex power to impose brutal punishment through public defamation, demonetization, ostracism, prison and even death on any who speak out against these obvious lies.

Disbelievers “are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves.” Drastic psychological damage is inflicted when people know something is false, but are inhibited by fear from saying so, or even pressured into mouthing the lies themselves, and even believing them; “they lose once and for all their sense of probity.” The lies are advertised as nothing but aspirations to the highest ideals—integrity and honesty to self and others. This is deeply demoralizing. The goal of neo-communist propaganda is suppression of dissent against it, and forced compliance with it. “To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself.” Neo-Communist Jews in the U.S. today impose their own evil—Jews and Their Lies—upon the goyim, in a process of projection-conversion. When we merely assent to silence, we participate in the evil. We are Judaized.

They say in their own causes: “Silence is violence,” and “See something, say something.” Those who break that silence and say something are rewarded. Yet they make saying something against their propaganda dreadfully costly and even painful. This is why free speech is now very expensive.

Daniels/Dalrymple summarizes: “A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.” Presumably he means “emasculated” as a lack of courage to speak truth to power. We become liars even to ourselves by failing to assert our own truths in the face of such obvious lies. In the Communist societies Dalyrmple and I have studied, everyone knew the official state propaganda was lies. Astonishingly, a significant percentage of people on both sides of the politically bi-partisan lies actually believes them, no matter how deliberately and intentionally it failed to correspond to reality. “Obvious lies,” are adopted as true by many Americans. And passionately. Interpreting Dalrymple, our neo-communist overlords would prefer we know it is all lies, and so they present their blatant absurdities in escalating extremism—but still gullible Americans believe. Ignorance is bliss, and perhaps they paradoxically escape the worst damage suffered among those who see the lies but dare not refute them.

It has been said by Solzhenitsyn that Americans are weak because we have not suffered under Communist domination, to gain perspective and make us strong. We are suffering now under Neo-Communist propaganda evil, and while many succumb to it—they can fool some of the people all of the time, and some of the people part of the time, but they can’t fool all of the people all the time. But the disbelievers  are far too often the ones forced to toe the lies and demoralize themselves, to renounce their probity.

Many have already defied this and spoken truth about power and to power. That is why we speak Taboo Truth. That is why the Occidental Observer presents the great body of knowledge it commands. Many other outlets of lie-busting and truth telling are here and growing. We retain our probity and undermine evil in the culture war for the Good Society founded on Truth. Truth leads to the Good Society. Neo-Communist lies now forced upon the U.S. population lead to ruin, chaos, enslavement and death, a tyranny of Neo-Communist overlords upon the “society of emasculated liars.”

Truth is our weapon in this culture war. Probity is our shield. They are trying to disarm us. Hold fast to the weapon of Truth and defend with the shield of probity. Daniels/Dalrymple as the son of a Jewess and a “Communist businessman” and a Fellow at the very Jewish Manhattan Institute may be showing us his strategy to deepen our demoralization. This should backfire. The more who know, the more we grow. Popular blowback is a growing tide that no Neo-Commie lies can stop. Power will always rise strong among a people of re-masculated truth-tellers.

Giftzwerg is a wonderful little German word. It’s pronounced “gift-tsvairk” and it literally means “poison-dwarf.” German-speakers use it of someone who is small but spiteful, especially when that person is spiteful because they’re small. But it was the Anglophone Charles Dickens who created perhaps the greatest Giftzwerg of all time in Daniel Quilp, the evil and cunning dwarf who spies, plots, and ruins lives in The Old Curiosity Shop (1841).

Small in size, big in evil

I argued in my article “Minority Malice” that Dickens intended Quilp to be a Jewish villain, symbolizing the malice and cunning of Jews as a minority among gentiles. Despite being a dwarf, Quilp has an outsized influence for ill on everyone around him, just as Jews, despite being a small minority, have had an outsized influence for ill on the world. For example, Jews were central to the conversion of the imperfect but reforming Tsarist empire into the mass-murdering tyranny of the Soviet Union, just as Jews have been central to the flooding of Western nations with tax-eating and criminally inclined non-Whites from the corrupt, violent and diseased Third World. Jews have also been central to the lunacies and lies of the transgender cult, which demands that mentally ill or sexually perverted men be accepted as full and authentic women simply because they claim to be women.

Fake woman and fake American: the Jewish transwoman and trans-American Richard Levine (aka Rachel Levine)

But the Jewish Giftzwergvolk — Poison-Dwarf-Tribe — has always needed gentile accomplices in its war on the greatness and the gigantic achievements of the White West. And it’s always been able to find them. In the great White nation of Scotland, the Giftzwergvolk found a literal Giftzwerg to do its dirty work. Nicola Sturgeon, the leader of the Scottish National Party (SNP), is small in size but has been big in evil during her time as First Minister of Scotland. Like the so-called nationalists of Plaid Cymru in Wales, the SNP want independence for their nation not because they want to benefit its true White citizens, but because they think it isn’t being destroyed fast enough as part of the United Kingdom. Both the SNP and Plaid Cymru want to flood their proud and ancient White nations with non-Whites from the Third World, then grant those non-Whites power and privilege over ordinary Whites. In the process, they would weaken and ultimately destroy all that is unique and precious about Scotland and Wales, especially those jewels in the crown of nationhood, the languages of Scots Gaelic and Welsh.

Wedge of Darkness

Like leftists throughout the White West, these parties want to use non-Whites as a kind of wedge of darkness hammered into the foundations of national identity. As the wedge gets deeper, the splits get wider and final destruction gets nearer. When a White Christian nation begins to accept non-Whites and non-Christians as full and authentic citizens, it has begun to abolish itself. And the abolition of Scotland and Wales is what the SNP and Plaid Cymru are working tirelessly to achieve. They’re typically leftist in seeking to destroy what they claim to most care about. For example, they also claim to care about women’s rights and women’s safety, but Nicola Sturgeon headed a campaign to undermine both by allowing male prisoners in Scotland to self-identify as women and then be transferred to female prisons. She dismissed the concerns of trans-skeptics like J.K. Rowling as “not valid.”

Glowering Giftzwerg: the troubled transphile Nicola Sturgeon

Alas for Sturgeon, those concerns proved to be very valid, because even as Sturgeon was taking her beloved Gender Recognition Bill through the Scottish parliament at Holyrood, a male rapist called Adam Graham was driving a wedge into the bill’s foundations. Graham announced during his trial that he was in fact a woman called Isla Bryson and ended up in a female prison. When the news came out, accompanied by photographs of Graham in a badly fitting blonde wig, there was a popular outcry and the SNP had to reverse its policy of allowing all transwomen to serve their sentences in female prisons. But it wasn’t only the SNP’s legislation that was split asunder by the scandal: it was also the lunacies and lies of transgenderism. This is a transcript of Nicola Sturgeon trying to defend her policies to a quick-witted male reporter:

Reporter: My question is: are all transgender women [in fact] women? You haven’t answered that question.

Sturgeon: Well, that’s not the point that we’re dealing with here.

Reporter: That’s the question I’m asking.

Sturgeon: Look, transwomen are women but in the prison context there is no automatic right for a transwoman–

Reporter: So there are contexts where a transwoman is not a woman?

Sturgeon: No, there is [laughs uncomfortably], there is circumstances in which a transwoman will be housed in the male prison estate.

Reporter: Is there any context in which a woman born as a woman will be housed in the male [prison] estate?

Sturgeon: Look, we’re talking here about transwomen.

Reporter: And I’m now asking about women born as women.

Sturgeon: Er, I don’t think there are circumstances there, but–

Reporter: So it’s different for transwomen?

Sturgeon: Well, yes, and I’m not–

Reporter: So they’re not equal?

Sturgeon: That is not — there is a risk-assessment process done for transwomen that takes account of the nature of the crime. Clearly, significant concern arises out of sexual crime and whether it’s appropriate for them to be in a female prison or a male prison. (Interview with Nicola Sturgeon about transgenderism)

Sturgeon could not give a coherent defence of her pro-tranny campaign because transgenderism is not a coherent cult. From the black looks she flashed at the reporter as he asked his impertinent questions, it was once again clear that she is an intolerant ideologue who hates being challenged. She has invested enormous prestige and will-to-power in her pro-tranny campaign and its derailment proved too much for her to bear. After the scandal, she announced her resignation from the posts of First Minister and leader of the SNP. The Giftzwerg will soon be gone from Scottish politics. That’s good in itself and also good as a possible portent for leftism as a whole. It isn’t only Nicola Sturgeon who has invested enormous prestige and will-to-power in the transgender cult. It’s mainstream leftists right across the West. If transgenderism is exposed and overturned for its lunacies and lies, this will be a huge defeat for leftism and may prove, ironically enough, the thin end of the wedge that destroys leftist domination of Western politics and culture.

Trans-Westernism dwarfs transgenderism

That’s because the lies and lunacies of transgenderism are also the lies and lunacies of what you might call trans-Westernism. Transgenderism is based on the lie that men can become full and authentic women; trans-Westernism is based on the lie that non-Whites can become full and authentic citizens of Western nations. As I pointed out in a previous article, racial differences aren’t as absolute and easily defined as the anatomical differences between men and women, but there are strong parallels between transgenderism and trans-Westernism. In a literal sense, men can’t give birth to children; in a metaphorical sense, non-Whites can’t give birth to Western civilization. On the contrary, they are capable only of aborting Western civilization.

And trans-Westernism is a much greater threat to women’s safety and female rights than transgenderism. I vehemently oppose transgenderism, but how many transgender “women” — that is, deluded or perverted men — have actually raped or otherwise harmed real women after being granted access to supposedly female-only spaces? Rapes and assaults by trannies have happened (see here, for example), but they’re rare. Now ask this: How many trans-Western men — that is, non-White men with Western citizenship or residence — have raped or otherwise harmed White women? Huge numbers. Rapes of White women by trans-Westerners must now be in the millions. In other words, trans-Western non-White men pose a far greater risk to women than men who claim to be women do. But trans-skeptics like J.K. Rowling never point this out, because Rowling and her allies are still leftist. In other words, they’re not standing up for Truth, Beauty and Goodness: they’re arguing only about status in the leftist war on the West. TERFs, or Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists, think that transwomen are still men and are therefore lower than real women in the great leftist hierarchy of virtue and villainy. Yes, I admire J.K. Rowling for speaking out because the SNP approves of unlimited male migration into female-only spaces. That takes moral courage and has exposed her to countless threats of rape and violence from transgender cultists.

Pakistanis can never be Scottish

But I would admire Rowling far more if she spoke out because the SNP approves of unlimited non-White migration into Scotland as a whole. The SNP are causing huge harm to Scottish women by importing and privileging male-supremacist rapists and misogynists from the Third World. However, because non-White men are higher in the leftist hierarchy than White women, leftist feminists like Rowling don’t protest against non-White immigration. Indeed, Rowling and her leftist allies will undoubtedly celebrate if Scotland acquires a trans-Western leader in the form of Hamza Yousuf, the authoritarian and anti-White Pakistani who wants to succeed Sturgeon as the leader of the SNP. If Yousuf wins the leadership contest, Rowling will say something like: “I disagree with the SNP’s transgender policies, but isn’t it wonderful that the party is now led by the descendant of Pakistani migrants to Scotland?”

Fake Scot: the anti-White Pakistani Muslim Hamza Yousaf, the trans-Westerner who wants to be First Minister of Scotland

Fake Briton: the geeky Indian Hindu Rishi Sunak, trans-Western prime minister of Britain

In fact, no, it wouldn’t be wonderful: it would be a further sign of Scotland’s dissolution as a true nation. The wedge of darkness would have been hammered deeper into the still-living roots of Scottish identity. That’s what Rishi Sunak’s appointment as prime minister in 2022 did to the roots of British identity. The geeky Hindu Indian Sunak is trans-British, not genuinely British. He has no roots in Britain and, as the British prime minister, he has no loyalty to or concern for the true White nations of England, Scotland, Ireland, and Wales. Instead, his loyalty is to himself and to the rich and powerful Jews who control British politics.

Jews can never be American

Jews were in fact the first trans-Westerners. They acquired that fake identity when they began to be accepted as true citizens of Western nations in the nineteenth century. Those early trans-Western Jews were a wedge of darkness in another sense: a wedge of evil and malice, small in size but strong in cohesion and will-to-power. Jews began to split Western identity with anti-White and anti-Christian activism, then succeeded in overturning bans on non-White immigration throughout the West. After their success with that wedge hammered into Western identity, they created transgenderism, another wedge for hammering into sexual identity. That’s why the Jew Richard Levine, a minister for health in Joe Biden’s Jew-heavy administration, is such a perfect symbol of Western dissolution. Levine is both transgender and trans-American, claiming to be both female and American. In both cases, he’s lying. As a male, he can’t be female; as a Jew, he can’t be American. And just as transwomen harm the interests of real women, so trans-Americans like Levine harm the interests of real Americans. The sinister trans-American Jew Alejandro Mayorkas, so-called Secretary for Homeland Security, is hammering the wedge of darkness even harder into America’s White roots by massively increasing already disastrous levels of non-White immigration. The even more sinister trans-American Jew Merrick Garland, US Attorney General, is waging war on “white supremacy,” which is the Judeo-leftist code for “white nationhood.”

Pernicious punims on implacable enemies of the White West: the Jewish trans-Americans Merrick Garland and Alejandro Mayorkas

More pernicious punims on more implacable enemies of White America: the Jewish trans-Americans Chuck Schumer and Jerry Nadler

These trans-American Jews are proof that the harm done by transgenderism is dwarfed by the harm done by trans-Westernism. Indeed, while Nicola Sturgeon can be called a Giftzwerg, a “poison-dwarf,” trans-Western Jews like Karl Marx, Sigmund Freud and Franz Boas can be called Giftriesen, or “poison-giants.” The lunacies and lies of these long-dead Jewish ideologues still power the war on the West. But my hope is that leftist defeat over transgenderism will forerun leftist defeat over trans-Westernism. Leftists are lying when they say that men can become women. They’re also lying when they say that non-Whites can become Westerners. Female identity belongs only to women and Western identity belongs only to Whites. Not to Pakistanis or Somalis. And certainly not to Jews.