INDIVIDUALISMO E TRADIZIONE PROGRESSISTA OCCIDENTALE: APPENDICE AL CAPITOLO 8: IL RECENTE DETERIORAMENTO CULTURALE: ALCUNE CORRELAZIONI CULTURALI   RIGUARDO ALL’ASCESA DI UNA NUOVA ÉLITE.

/in /by

INDIVIDUALISMO E
TRADIZIONE PROGRESSISTA OCCIDENTALE.
Origini evolutive, storia e prospettive future.
traduzione italiana di Marco Marchett

APPENDICE AL CAPITOLO 8:

IL RECENTE DETERIORAMENTO CULTURALE: ALCUNE CORRELAZIONI CULTURALI  

RIGUARDO ALL’ASCESA DI UNA NUOVA ÉLITE.

 

 

E’ stato osservato come la Guerra Civile inglese abbia rappresentato un punto di rottura fondamentale nella storia dell’Occidente. Un’altra epoca spartiacque furono gli anni Sessanta del Novecento. Il risultato della Guerra Civile Inglese fu la graduale ascesa di una nuova élite; il successo della rivoluzione controculturale degli anni Sessanta ha avuto anch’esso come risultato l’ascesa di una nuova élite, che ha rapidamente cambiato il paese [gli Stati Uniti, n. d. t.]. L’eclissi della vecchia élite americana dominata dai WASP è descritta nel libro di Eric Kaufmann The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America [L’ascesa e la caduta dell’AngloAmerica, n. d. t.] (si veda il capitolo 6)1; l’ascesa della nuova élite a dominanza ebraica è descritta nel mio libro The Culture of Critique [La cultura della critica, n. d. t.]. Se, in ultima analisi, il perdente della Guerra Civile Inglese fu l’aristocrazia, quello della controrivoluzione culturale degli anni Sessanta fu la popolazione bianca degli Stati Uniti (e in definitiva l’intero Occidente) ma soprattutto la classe lavoratrice bianca.

Se la più importante conseguenza della controrivoluzione culturale degli anni Sessanta è stata la colonizzazione dell’Occidente da parte di milioni di non-europei (al punto che, se tale situazione non si inverte, la popolazione europea tradizionale sarà destinata a divenire una minoranza entro il presente secolo) sono altresì avvenuti profondi cambiamenti nella cultura occidentale. Questa Appendice prende in esame gli effetti di questa rivoluzione culturale sulla famiglia e sul recente aumento della mortalità che riguarda in particolare la classe lavoratrice bianca.

 

Il generale declino culturale in America a partire dagli anni Sessanta.

 

Un tema de La cultura della critica è che l’élite ebraica egemone ha avuto un ruolo fondamentale nel successo della controrivoluzione culturale degli anni Sessanta, sia come guida dei radicali nelle università sia come promotrice della rivoluzione sessuale2. Riguardo a quest’ultima, gli individui con un maggiore quoziente di intelligenza [d’ora in avanti q. d. i., n. d. t.] patiscono meno l’erosione dei sostegni culturali alla genitorialità ad elevato investimento e il declino delle credenze religiose tradizionali (in particolare le credenze cristiane relative al comportamento sessuale) di quanto avvenga per gli individui con un q. d. i. inferiore. Questo è stato in particolare uno dei temi del capitolo dedicato alla psicanalisi, che si è concentrato sugli effetti della rivoluzione sessuale3.

Sebbene l’Occidente abbia prodotto una cultura decisamente individualista, ha mantenuto forti controlli sociali su certi aspetti del comportamento individuale, e in particolare sul comportamento sessuale. Questi controlli sociali sono stati rafforzati dalla pervasività delle credenze religiose cristiane. Per quanto vi siano certamente stati periodi in cui il controllo sul comportamento sessuale era maggiore e altri in cui era minore, in generale e almeno a partire dal Medioevo la cultura occidentale è stata caratterizzata dal matrimonio monogamico, dalla genitorialità ad elevato investimento e da un tasso di divorzi molto basso, con pratiche sessuali non monogamiche relegate al mondo clandestino della prostituzione.

In generale, gli individui con un q. d. i. inferiore traggono maggior beneficio dai sostegni sociali tradizionali incorporati nella cultura occidentale, e in particolare da quelli che riguardano il matrimonio e i costumi atti a prevenire le gravidanze extramatrimoniali. Nel corso del precedente periodo della mia vita, nel quale ho insegnato psicologia dello sviluppo, il capitolo del libro di testo che trattava la famiglia aveva dei diagrammi che mostravano come a partire dagli anni 1960 si sia verificato un sensibile aumento delle nascite extramatrimoniali e dei divorzi, col risultato che molti più bambini sono stati allevati senza un padre. Questo fatto ha aperto nuovi orizzonti nella psicologia infantile, nella misura in cui gli psicologi hanno indagato gli effetti sui bambini di questi cambiamenti culturali. I risultati appaiono chiari: divorzi, famiglie monogenitoriali e nascite al di fuori del matrimonio rappresentano forti fattori di rischio per un’ampia gamma di problemi dei minori, come la delinquenza, la criminalità, gli scarsi risultati scolastici, le carenze nella salute fisica ed emotiva, la mortalità precoce4.

Uno dei temi principali del libro di Richard Herrnstein e Charles Murray, The Bell Curve [La curva a campana, n. d. t.] è che il divorzio e le altre forme di disfunzionalità familiare siano più frequenti tra gli individui che si collocano all’estremo inferiore della curva di distribuzione del q. d. i.5. La sola ragione per cui faccio uso del q. d. .i. è che questo parametro è stato studiato molto di più e può essere misurato con molta precisione; tuttavia utilizzando il controllo degli impulsi si possono ottenere risultati simili. Gli individui con q. d. i. più basso sono anche quelli che hanno maggiori difficoltà a controllare i loro impulsi, che tendono maggiormente alla gratificazione immediata piuttosto che ad una pianificazione a lungo termine e che probabilmente sono più inclini alla dipendenza da droghe6. Di conseguenza essi soffrono maggiormente a causa dell’erosione dei sostegni culturali alla genitorialità ad elevato investimento (che implicano rimandare nel tempo i rapporti sessuali, non rimanere incinta prima del matrimonio, ecc.). Nella scuola superiore che ho frequentato (una scuola cattolica nella quale l’ideologia tradizionale in materia sessuale era saldamente vigente) praticamente nessun alunno aveva rapporti sessuali. Ma ciò avveniva tra la fine degli anni 1950 e l’inizio degli anni 1960; dopo quel periodo, quella cultura ha subito un attacco che ha conseguito un notevole successo.

Il cristianesimo tradizionale era una delle componenti principali di quei sostegni culturali. Citando da La cultura della critica:

 

Come osserva [Norman] Podhoretz, «si dà il caso, infatti, che gli intellettuali ebrei, le organizzazioni ebraiche come l’American Jewish Congress ed altre organizzazioni a dominanza ebraica come la ACLU […] abbiano messo in ridicolo le credenze religiose cristiane, abbiano cercato di privare il cristianesimo del sostegno del pubblico e abbiano guidato la campagna per eliminare ogni restrizione alla pornografia7». Il fatto è che la psicanalisi, in quanto movimento intellettuale a dominanza ebraica, rappresenta una componente centrale di questa guerra contro i sostegni culturali alla genitorialità ad elevato investimento […]

Sebbene siano indubbiamente coinvolti altri fattori, è degno di nota il fatto che la crescente tendenza, negli

Stati Uniti, verso una genitorialità a basso investimento coincida ampiamente col trionfo delle critiche mosse

dalla psicanalisi e dai radicali alla cultura americana, trionfo rappresentato dal successo politico e culturale del movimento della controcultura degli anni Sessanta8.

 

Queste tendenze si sono manifestate in tutte le razze, ma interesano più i negri dei bianchi perché i negri, in media, si collocano all’incirca una deviazione standard più in basso sulla curva di distribuzione del q. d. i. rispetto ai bianchi e, come si è osservato nel capitolo 8, hanno un minore controllo degli impulsi (coscienziosità). I negri hanno sempre mostrato un’elevata percentuale di nascite extramatrimoniali, ma il divario è aumentato a partire dagli anni Sessanta.

Questi dati concordano con la classifica delle differenze evolutive razziali proposta da J. Philippe Rushton9. I comportamenti sessuali sono ereditari (ossia influenzati geneticamente): uno studio ha mostrato che prima della rivoluzione sessuale l’età del primo rapporto sessuale non era sostanzialmente influenzata dalle differenze genetiche, perché esistevano forti norme sociali contrarie al sesso prematrimoniale; se non c’è variazione, allora, per definizione, non può esserci neppure una variazione influenzata dalla genetica; ne consegue pertanto che l’età del primo rapporto sessuale non era ereditaria in misura significativa10. Nella scuola superiore da me frequentata dunque, dato che nessuno aveva rapporti sessuali, l’età del primo rapporto non era un aspetto ereditario. Essa tuttavia lo divenne dopo la rivoluzione sessuale; gli individui inclini ad un modello lento di storia di vita e ad un elevato controllo degli impulsi rimasero in ogni caso più inclini a procrastinare l’inizio della vita sessuale, ad evitare gravidanze extramatrimoniali e a restare uniti nel matrimonio. Come ci si può aspettare sulla base della teoria di Rushton, la rivoluzione sessuale si è invece dimostrata un disastro per la maggior parte dei negri. Nel 1965 il 24% dei bambini negri e il 3.1% dei bambini bianchi erano figli di ragazze madri, quote che oggi valgono rispettivamente il 72% e il 29% circa11. Nel suo libro Coming Apart [Dissoluzione / Disgregazione, n. d. t.] Charles Murray nota che tra i bianchi, a partire dagli anni Sessanta, si è osservato un aumento del crimine e una diminuzione della religiosità, dell’etica del lavoro e dei matrimoni12. Tra il 1960 e il 2000, nella classe medio-alta la quota di matrimoni è scesa dal 94% all’84%, ma per la classe lavoratrice bianca tale diminuzione è stata dall’82% al 48%. In quest’ultima classe il numero delle persone che non si sono mai sposate è aumentato dal 10% al 25%, fenomeno al quale i lavoratori di basso livello hanno fornito un considerevole contributo. Murray attribuisce tutto ciò a una perdita di “virtù”, ma non esamina le forze che stanno dietro a questo massiccio mutamento culturale.

E frequente, tra i critici di Murray, sostenere che tali cambiamenti siano il risultato delle condizioni economiche piuttosto che della cultura in senso più ampio. Sotto questo aspetto, nell’America dei primi anni Sessanta un diplomato di scuola superiore poteva aspettarsi di trovare un lavoro che gli avrebbe permesso di sposarsi, consentendo a sua moglie di restare a casa e di allevare i figli. Avrebbe potuto acquistare una casa e un’automobile e anche permettersi di portare in vacanza la famiglia, d’estate, per due settimane.

Il problema, dunque, è che le nuove tendenze riguardanti il matrimonio e la famiglia hanno cominciato a manifestarsi negli anni Sessanta, quando la classe lavoratrice bianca stava bene, per raggiungere il culmine nei primi anni Settanta e, successivamente, ristagnare13. La rapida impennata nelle nuove tendenze nell’ambito della famiglia e in altri aspetti disfunzionali della società ha avuto inizio intorno al 1960 e ha continuato fino al 1990 circa, quando ha subito un temporaneo arretramento prima di raggiungere nuovi picchi. Nel 1970, quando la classe lavoratrice bianca aveva raggiunto la massima prosperità economica, il numero delle nascite extramatrimoniali era già triplicato rispetto al 1960.

Non c’è dubbio sul fatto che il periodo compreso tra il 1948 e i primi anni Settanta sia stato l’età d’oro della classe lavoratrice (lavoratori senza mansioni di controllo) con la presenza di sindacati forti e senza il problema dell’esternalizzazione del lavoro. A partire dal 1973 il reddito di questo gruppo è aumentato, in termini reali, di circa il 9%14: molto meno che per i laureati, e tuttavia più un fenomeno di stagnazione che un disastro, che di per sé non avrebbe dovuto provocare un aumento della disfunzionalità familiare.

Né avrebbe dovuto provocare un aumento della mortalità, visti i progressi compiuti dalla medicina nella cura delle malattie cardiache e dei tumori. Angus Case e Anne Deaton fanno notare che qualsiasi spiegazione di tipo economico deve rendere conto del perché una stagnazione dei redditi provochi una mortalità precoce tra i bianchi americani, ma non tra i negri o in Europa. «Anche risalendo fino ai tardi anni Sessanta si osserva come i redditi familiari medi fossero simili per bianchi, negri e ispanici; questo fatto non può pertanto fornire alcuna base per spiegare le forti differenze nella mortalità tra questi gruppi dopo il 1998»15. Ciò esclude anche [dalle possibili cause, n. d. t.] l’aumento delle diseguaglianze di reddito (“il tuo reddito cresce più rapidamente del mio”) come pure un calo della “virtù” propiziato da un generoso sistema assistenziale e di sostegno ai disabili (anche l’Europa ha robusti programmi assistenziali).

In generale, stando a Case e Deaton, l’aumento della mortalità nella classe lavoratrice bianca comincia negli anni Novanta. Il primo gruppo nel quale il fenomeno è apparso chiaramente è quello degli individui nati nel 1950 (e che nel 1990 avevano 40 anni) che è stato anche la prima generazione e sperimentare, in età adolescenziale, la rivoluzione sessuale. Per ciascun gruppo di età successivo l’incremento di mortalità dovuto a droghe, malattie del fegato, alcol e suicidi inizia più precocemente ed è più ripido, ossia raggiunge più velocemente livelli più alti. Queste tendenze sono più pronunciate per gli uomini che per le donne e variano in funzione del livello di istruzione, dove i dati di gran lunga peggiori sono quelli dei bianchi che hanno un diploma di scuola superiore o un titolo inferiore.

Gina Kolata e Sarah Cohen hanno elaborato queste scoperte sulla base dell’esame di 60 milioni di certificati di morte datati tra il 1990 e il 2014, ma quanto alle cause puntano il dito sugli oppioidi e non sull’alcol o sui suicidi16:

Nel 2014 il tasso di mortalità per overdose da droghe legali e illegali tra i bianchi nella fascia d’età compresa tra i 25 e i 34 anni era quintuplicato rispetto al 1999, mentre quello per la fascia d’età tra i 35 e i 44 anni era triplicato nello stesso periodo […] Mentre il tasso di mortalità dei giovani bianchi è cresciuto per ogni gruppo d’età nel corso dei cinque anni precedenti il 2014, esso è aumentato più velocemente, sotto ogni aspetto, per quelli meno istruiti, e cioè del 24% per coloro che non hanno un’istruzione di scuola superiore rispetto al solo 4% di quelli che hanno un diploma universitario o un titolo più elevato.

Un altro studio ha rilevato come l’incremento di mortalità non fosse attribuibile all’alcolismo, bensì all’epidemia dell’abuso di oppioidi. Gli autori osservano che il tasso di mortalità «ha cominciato ad aumentare intorno all’epoca in cui le prescrizioni di oppioidi sono divenute facilmente ottenibili e da allora ha continuato a salire costantemente»17.

Dato che un analogo aumento di mortalità non si è verificato in Europa, il mutamento culturale introdotto dalla psicanalisi non rappresenta l’unica causa18. Il generale declino culturale è scollegato dall’incremento della mortalità; il fatto che le relazioni familiari siano disfunzionali non implica, da solo, un tale incremento. Tuttavia ho il sospetto che i due fattori interagiscano tra loro, nel senso che se i sostegni culturali che esistevano fino agli anni 1950 fossero rimasti integri, la classe lavoratrice bianca non sarebbe caduta vittima dell’epidemia degli oppioidi.

Ancora una volta, gli individui con un profilo di storia di vita più veloce sono i meno capaci a controllare i loro impulsi e pertanto sono i più inclini ad un comportamento maladattivo in un ambiente culturale permissivo inondato dalle droghe nel quale i vincoli al comportamento di tipo religioso e culturale si sono indeboliti. L’effetto combinato di questi due fattori (il mutamento culturale portato dal trionfo della rivoluzione controculturale e l’eccesso di droghe) è stato un disastro per la classe lavoratrice bianca19. Sotto questo aspetto è interessante notare che la prima generazione che ha mostrato un aumento di mortalità è stata quella che è entrata nell’adolescenza negli anni Sessanta.

Come si legge ne La cultura della critica, il movimento che ha promosso l’uso degli oppioidi ha avuto origine tra le élite e si è basato in ultima analisi su dottrine pseudoscientifiche prodotte ai massimi livelli del sistema medico universitario e motivate dal tornaconto economico di una schiera di soggetti che va dai professori delle facoltà di medicina fino ai rappresentanti delle aziende produttrici e ai medici di base.

Un problema fondamentale nel trattare questo argomento, oggi, sta nel fatto che la tendenza all’incremento della mortalità messa in moto dai processi di cui si è detto è destinata a persistere, a prescindere da quanto facciano in governi in materia di prescrizione degli oppioidi. L’introduzione di nuove restrizioni ha semplicemente l’effetto di spingere i tossicodipendenti verso l’eroina ed altre droghe illegali. Infatti, mentre nel 2002 i casi di morte provocati dalla prescrizione di oppioidi erano molto più numerosi rispetto alla somma di quelli dovuti all’eroina e alle droghe sintetiche, nel 2017 i casi di morte per questa seconda causa sono stati 43000 contro i soli 17000 dovuti alla prescrizione di oppioidi20.

Il fenomeno degli oppioidi riflette la cultura americana posteriore agli anni Sessanta. E’ il prodotto della culture dell’élite, dotata di mezzi finanziari cospicui e con accesso alle più prestigiose istituzioni della società. Grazie a questo prestigio, essa è stata in grado di presentare informazioni sostanzialmente false come dati scientifici e di farle accettare dalla classe dirigente medica. Analogamente, nel caso della campagna per l’attuazione della legge sull’immigrazione del 1965, i comitati pro-immigrazione sono stati finanziati da soggetti facoltosi, sono stati prodotti studi accademici fraudolenti in favore dell’immigrazione, sono apparsi nei mezzi di informazione articoli che davano dell’immigrazione un’immagine positiva, sono stati pagati dei lobbisti e reclutate persone di spicco. Un buon esempio di quest’ultimo aspetto è dato da John F. Kennedy (che era destinato a diventare presidente) reclutato per figurare come autore di un libro intitolato A Nation of Immigrants [Una nazione di immigrati, n. d. t.] scritto in realtà da Meyer Feldman e pubblicato dalla Anti Defamation League21.

Troviamo un’analogia anche nell’infrastruttura del movimento neoconservatore, con gruppi di esperti ben finanziati, portavoce illustri presso università prestigiose e una presenza nei media molto forte. I neocon possono essere certi che qualora dovessero perdere il loro lavoro presso il Dipartimento di Stato o quello della Difesa troverebbero ancora molte possibilità di impiego nel mondo universitario, nei centri di studio o nei gruppi lobbistici. Malgrado abbiano sostenuto politiche disastrose, come la guerra in Iraq, essi rappresentano ancora una componente molto potente del gruppo che gestisce la politica estera statunitense22.

Conclusione: l’effetto trasformativo della rivoluzione controculturale degli anni Sessanta.

La rivoluzione controculturale degli anni Sessanta ha avuto un effetto trasformativo sulla società americana altrettanto drammatico quanto quello prodotto dall’eclissi dell’aristocrazia e del modello indoeuropeo della cultura occidentale che ebbe inizio nel XVII secolo. Questa nuova cultura si basa fondamentalmente sull’importazione di non-occidentali con funzione di clienti della sinistra, fattore vitale per la permanenza della sua egemonia, come già si è visto in stati come la California, dove i conservatori anche moderati sono esclusi dal processo politico; tale fattore è anche considerato, da molti dei suoi sostenitori più convinti, come una garanzia contro l’ascesa dei movimenti identitari bianchi che si oppongono con forza agli interessi dei gruppi minoritari.

Se questo processo di trasformazione non verrà invertito, esso comporterà sostanzialmente la fine del nucleo etnico della civiltà occidentale e, molto probabilmente, di tutto l’insieme delle strutture culturali create dall’Occidente. E a causa dell’incremento delle politiche volte a tutelare le identità non-bianche, significherà probabilmente la fine dell’individualismo, nella misura in cui i bianchi si raccoglieranno in gruppi coesi in grado di affermare i loro interessi nel nuovo contesto multiculturale.

Note.

 

  • Eric P. KAUFMANN, The Rise and Fall of Anglo-America, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 2004.
  • Kevin MACDONALD, The Culture of Critique: An Evolutionary Analysis of Jewish Involvement in

Twentieth-Century Intellectual and Political Movements, Bloomington, IN, AuthorHouse, 2002 (ed. orig.

Westport, CT, Praeger, 1998), cap. 3.

  • Ibid., cap. 4.
  • Questi risultati sono posti in evidenza da Anne CASE e Angus DEATON nel loro influente articolo Mortality and Morbidity in the 21st Century, “Brookings Papers on Economic Activity”, marzo 2017; https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/6_casedeaton.pdf
  • Richard J. HERRNSTEIN, Charles MURRAY, The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life, New York, Free Press, 1994.
  • FIGUEREDO et al., The Psychometric Assessment of Human Life History Strategy.
  • Norman PODHORETZ, In the Matter of Pat Robertson, “Commentary”, agosto 1995: 28-32, 30.
  • MACDONALD, The Culture of Critique.
  • , J. Philippe RUSHTON, Race, Evolution and Behavior: A Life History Perspective, Nwe Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Publishers, 1994.
  • Michael Patrick DUNNE, Nicholas G. MARTIN, Andrew C. HEATH, Genetic and Environmental

Contributions to Variance in Age at First Sexual Intercourse, “Psychological Science”, 8, n. 3, gennaio

1997: 211-216; https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00414.x

  • Sara MCLANAHAN, Christopher JENCKS, Was Moynihan Right?, “Education Next”, 15, n. 2, primavera 2015.
  • Charles MURRAY, Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960-2010, New York, Crown Forum, 2012.
  • CASE, DEATON, Mortality and Morbidity in the 21st Century.
  • Lawrence MISHEL, Elise GOULD, Josh BIVENS, Wage Stagnation in Nine Charts, “Economic Policy Institute”, 6 gennaio 2015; https://www.epi.org/publication/charting-wage-stagnation/
  • CASE, DEATON, Mortality and Morbidity in the 21st Century. Come osserviamo più avanti, studi basati su dati più recenti rilevano un brusco incremento della mortalità tra i negri e gli ispanici provocato dagli oppioidi.
  • Gina KOLATA e Sarah COHEN, Drug Overdoses Propel Rise in Mortality Rates of Young Whites, “The New York Times”, 16 gennaio 2016; https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/science/drug-overdoses-propelrise-in-mortality-rates-of-young-whites.html?_r=0
  • Opioids and Obesity, Not “Despair Deaths”, Raising Mortality Rates for White Americans, “Science Daily”, 20 luglio 2017:

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/07/170720142334.htm

  • Mente gli studi precedenti avevano rilevato una mortalità più alta tra i bianchi, in particolare tra quelli appartenenti alla classe lavoratrice delle zone rurali, studi più recenti hanno osservato un aumento della mortalità nella popolazione negra e ispanica e nelle aree urbane; si veda ad esempio Marisa PEÑALOZA, The Opioid Crisis Is Surging in the Black, Urban Communities, “NPR”, 8 marzo 2018:

https://www.npr.org/2018/03/08/579193399/the-opioid-crisis-frightening-jump-to-black-urban-areas [19] Kevin MACDONALD, Opioids and the Crisis of The White Working Class, “The Occidental Quarterly”, 18, n. 1, primavera 2018: 41-56.

  • Sources and Burden of Opioids, National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation, dicembre 2018. Lo studio si basa su dati aggiornati al 2017: https://www.nihcm.org/categories/sources-and-burden-of-opioid-deaths
  • Jerry KAMMER, The Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965, Center for Immigration Studies, 30 settembre 2015; https://cis.org/Report/HartCeller-Immigration-Act-1965 [22] MACDONALD, Neoconservatism as a Jewish Movement.

 

 

Triumph of the (Well-Funded) Shrill: Exposing the Funding Networks of the Left

/49 Comments/in /by

Months of sheltering-in-place have gone down the drain—along with tens of millions of jobs[1]—when rioters torched parts of dozens of American cities in response to media-generated outrage over the questionable killings of two black men (and one legitimate police phone call in Central Park). 1,288 public health professionals, infectious diseases professionals, and community stakeholders signed the following excerpted open letter showing at once that there are no adults in the room and where the real priorities lie:

A public health response to these demonstrations is also warranted, but this message must be wholly different from the response to White protestors resisting stay-home orders. Infectious disease and public health narratives adjacent to demonstrations against racism must be consciously anti-racist, and infectious disease experts must be clear and consistent in prioritizing an anti-racist message.

Right, because “racism” somehow has something to do with an artificially-generated global pandemic that could’ve easily been stopped in China. At the onset, it was apparently racist to prevent flights from infected areas, until the coronavirus reached Europe that is, as it had something to do with anti-Asian bias or some such vagary pushed by the media. Now not only is the virus itself “racist,” but it is somehow bound up in White supremacy. As the letter “educates” us:

White supremacy is a lethal public health issue that predates and contributes to COVID-19 (note: no evidence provided, obviously)…COVID-19 among Black patients is yet another lethal manifestation of white supremacy [note: notice how Black is capitalized but White is not]… In addressing demonstrations against White supremacy, our first statement must be one of unwavering support for those who would dismantle, uproot, or reform racist institutions…However, as public health advocates, we do not condemn these gatherings as risky for COVID-19 transmission. We support them as vital to the national public health and to the threatened health specifically of Black people in the United States.

This is out-of-control, completely irresponsible, and dangerously stupid, and yet medical professionals and supposed experts from places like Harvard Medical School, Cornell University, UCLA, USC, the University of Chicago, Columbia University, Northwestern University, and others co-signed this letter. Incidentally, all of those schools are part of the advancement of the transgender agenda, but that is a topic for another time. This is sadly totally expected at this point. We have “progressed” right off a cliff.

Regarding these “demonstrations,” it is worth looking into who has jumped to the aid of the looters and agitators. The Minnesota Freedom Fund was able to raise around $20 million over four days or so of unrest to free incarcerated rioters by paying their bail and pledging to cover subsequent legal fees. This is a prime example of what has been called the “Every Single Time” phenomenon, or also called Déjà Jew by Spencer Quinn, who writes: “For example, when someone with odd-sounding name goes on an unhinged liberal rant on the news or on social media, the tired, bitter cynic in you thinks, ‘Jew.’ Then you look him up to verify and discover, once again, that you are right.” In a similar vein, given the resources marshaled and the speed with which this was accomplished and for what purposes, I took it upon myself to look into the organization, and lo and behold names like Michael Friedman and Greg Lewin jumped right off the page! Unsurprisingly, Jewish celebrities such as Seth Rogen were very public about making donations to this organization.

Liberal ideology has been readily embraced by Jews for many reasons, but particularly germane here is that if it is racist or anti-Semitic or what have you to make group-level evaluative judgements or even simple statements of fact—unless it’s a negative directed toward Whites of course—understanding that obviously not every single person in that group fits that description, then it makes it virtually impossible for many Whites to accurately observe let alone voice that on a population level, Jews are congenitally subversive and harbor very clear anti-White animus. Europeans understood this for centuries, but only the relatively recent embrace of liberalism has cast past self-preservation methods distinctly in the “problematic” category. What is especially disconcerting is that the European Union has come to believe that its “values”—which are identical to those of the Anglosphere at present—supersede the right of each European ethnicity to have a homeland unencumbered by the world’s wretched refuse and by Jewish capitalists and various other denizens of the Island of Misfit Toys. In fact, the right of Europeans to exist at all is now “problematic.” The invocation of these esoteric and ever-shifting “values” recalls the 2017 policy paper authored by Helen Dempster and Karen Hargrave under the auspices of Chatham House and the Overseas Development Institute (ODI)’s Forum on Refugee and Migration Policy initiative: “Emotive and value-driven arguments may have more traction than facts and evidence. Successful strategies might highlight the manageability of the situation, while emphasising shared values.” Cue coronavirus advertisement that “we’re all in this together.” Right. They are all in this together, although I suppose in a way we—meaning European peoples—are, too, earmarked for destruction as we are.

The Ford Foundation has invested in the Black-Led Movement Fund (BLMF) and Soros’s Open Society Foundations provided funding to the Campaign for Black Male Achievement, which in turn supports BMAfunders. Both George Soros and Michael Bloomberg have been astroturfing these “grassroots” kinds of organizations for years, with just one instance being the $30 million each “for black and Latino men in New York City” in 2011. In 2007, after the Ford Foundation published “Why We Can’t Wait,” ABFE (“A Philanthropic Partnership for Black Communities”), Casey Family Programs, Ford, and the Open Society Foundations hosted a National Funders’ Dialogue on Black Males in Seattle to “discuss grantmaking for black males.” The following year, the Open Society Foundations launched the Campaign for Black Male Achievement and the Kirwan Institute for the Study of Race and Ethnicity published a report funded by the WK Kellogg Foundation “designed to expand scholarship on black males.” In 2010, the American Values Institute, the Knight Foundation, and the Open Society Foundations hosted the Black Male Re-Imagined conference to “change media portrayals of black males.” In 2012, Open Society and its partners launched the Leadership and Sustainability Institute to “support nonprofit organizations working with black males” and the Open Society Foundations also hosted the Black Male Achievement Innovation & Impact Forum for foundation, government, business, and nonprofit leaders to “build on momentum in the field.” According to POLITICO, in late 2015:

Some of the biggest donors on the left plan to meet behind closed doors…with leaders of the Black Lives Matter movement and their allies. The meetings are taking place at the annual winter gathering of the Democracy Alliance major liberal donor club, which runs from Tuesday evening through Saturday morning and is expected to draw Democratic financial heavyweights, including Tom Steyer and Paul Egerman… The DA, as the club is known in Democratic circles, is recommending its donors step up check writing to a handful of endorsed groups that have supported the Black Lives Matter movement… The Democracy Alliance was created in 2005 by a handful of major donors, including billionaire financier George Soros and Taco Bell heir Rob McKay…Endorsed beneficiaries include the Center for American Progress think tank, the liberal attack dog Media Matters and the Democratic data firm Catalist, though members also give heavily to Democratic politicians and super PACs that are not part of the DA’s core portfolio…The Democracy Alliance last year voted to endorse a handful of groups focused on engaging African-Americans in politics ― some of which have helped facilitate the Black Lives movement.[2]

Black Lives Matter, Inc., “a global organization in the US, UK, and Canada, whose mission is to eradicate White supremacy” and which “affirm[s] the lives of Black queer and trans folks, disabled folks, undocumented folks, folks with records, women, and all Black lives along the gender spectrum” is underwritten by an NGO called Thousand Currents, whose major donors include: the MacArthur Foundation, Apple Computer Inc., International Planned Parenthood Federation, Zephyr Real Estate, Chevron Matching Gift Program, the JP Morgan Chase Foundation, the NoVo Foundation, Oracle Corporation, the Mills Family Foundation, the Horizons Foundation, the Clif Bar Family Foundation, the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, the WK Kellogg Foundation, Rita Brandeis Memorial Fund at the Tides Foundation, and the Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust.

Pilar Weiss, the director of Community Justice Exchange, which runs a directory of bail funds around the country called the National Bail Fund Network, spoke positively about the donations to free rioters and criminals in the midst of the post-George Floyd “unrest”; it will not surprise the reader to learn that Community Justice Exchange is bankrolled by the Left-wing organization the Tides Center. Another similar organization, the Brooklyn Community Bail Fund, which is “a radical intervention in a system that treats people differently based on wealth, skin color, immigration status and influence” (which is true, but not in the way they’re claiming), was initially helmed by Peter Goldberg, and focuses on bailing out “ethnic” criminals and illegal aliens held in detention. Some of its primary funders include the Ford Foundation, the Jewish JM Kaplan Fund, FJC – A Foundation of Philanthropic Funds (run by the Jewish Leonard Glickman), Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation Open Philanthropy Project Fund.

The Bail Project is yet another; its “advisors” include Danny Glover, Richard Branson, and John Legend. Incidentally, Legend’s wife Chrissy Teigen donated $200,000 to bail funds across the country in the midst of the civil unrest. The Bail Project’s CEO is Robin Steinberg and its Board members include people like Lili Lynton, member of the Advisory Council of The Hamilton Project, which promotes Third World immigrants to feed the furnace of neo-liberal economics organizations (covered in The Way Life Should Be?). Some of The Bail Project’s partners include TED (of TED Talks fame), the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, UCLA Law School, the University of Louisville’s Anne Braden Institute for Social Justice Research, and the EBONY Foundation. The Peoples City Council Freedom Fund (Los Angeles) posted the following on June 1st, 2020 (typos corrected):

People’s City Council Will Distribute Hundreds Of Thousands Of Dollars To Black Lives Matter LA And The National Lawyers Guild To Support Those Involved With The Ongoing Rebellion In Los Angeles…We are immediately transferring $300,000 to Black Lives Matter, Los Angeles (BLMLA), who of course have been one of the main organizations leading this struggle, not just this past weekend, but for years. We are also immediately transferring $300,000 to the National Lawyers Guild of Los Angeles (NLG-LA). NLG has defended the civil liberties of the most radical activists and demonstrators for nearly a century, and the LA chapter already has an army of volunteers working around the clock to do all they can to provide support for those arrested and detained in Los Angeles. In addition, at least $150,000 is currently being set aside strictly for bail; we are working with organizers from the Bail Project here in Los Angeles on this (though the Bail Project as an organization is not involved).

Vogue provided an extensive list of these groups to donate to, including:

  • Restoring Justice (Houston), which partners with the Houston Texans Social Justice Fund, the Baylor University Diana R. Garland School of Social Work, and Black Lives Matter Houston, among others;
  • the Richmond Community Bail Fund;
  • the Colorado Freedom Fund (Denver);
  • the Vegas Freedom Fund.

Many of these and similar groups receive support from the 501(c)(3) “charity” Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights, of which Danny Glover is a trustee; its Board members include:

  • Jewish lesbian Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers;
  • Marvin S. Rosen of Greenberg Traurig LLP (“advises private equity firms, hedge funds, activist and distressed investors on special strategies”);
  • Martin Sheen;
  • Kenneth Goldman, former CFO of Yahoo! and President of Hillspire;
  • Cara Kennedy-Cuomo (“Associate at 17 Asset Management, a global firm that designs and manages investments aligned with the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). She is also a partner at Sahar Global Summits, where she leads the group’s diversity and inclusion division. Cara has also worked for Jeffrey Sachs on international development efforts.”);
  • Massachusetts Congressman Joe Kennedy III;
  • Harry Belafonte;
  • Claudio Grossman (“One of the top 25 most influential people in legal education. He has also received numerous awards for his work with human rights and international law, including the Harry LeRoy Jones Award from the Washington Foreign Law Society and the René Cassin Award from B’nai B’rith International in Chile”);
  • Michael Posner, former Obama administration official and Jerome Kohlberg professor of ethics and finance at NYU Stern School of Business; Posner is also Co-Director of the Center of Business and Human Rights at NYU;
  • Niclas Kjellström-Matseke, Founding Partner and Head of Europe & Africa for 17 Asset Management and former “Advisory Board Member of The Elders Foundation, which was set up by Nelson Mandela with the aim of getting global leaders to work together for peace and human rights”;
  • Betty Liu (“Chief Experience Officer at Intercontinental Exchange (NYSE: ICE) and Executive Vice Chairman for NYSE Group, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Exchange… Prior to joining the NYSE in 2018, Liu was an award-winning business journalist. She most recently anchored the Bloomberg Television ‘Daybreak Asia’ program.”);
  • Peter Edelman, former Counselor to HHS Secretary Donna Shalala (“I’ve been a friend of Israel for a long time”), former Law Clerk to Arthur J. Goldberg, Board member of the Center for American Progress Action Fund, and Board President Emeritus of the New Israel Fund.

The Philadelphia Community Bail Fund, “governed and driven by a group of volunteer Core Organizers who are mostly Black, women, queer and gender nonconforming folk including formerly incarcerated people bailed out by PCBF,” is financially-backed by organizations such as the Eagles Social Justice Fund (funded by the Philadelphia Eagles professional football franchise, owned by the Jewish Jeffrey Lurie[3]) and the Samuel S. Fels Fund, named after “the son of Jewish refugees who fled Bavaria, Germany in 1848 to escape the Revolutionary uprisings.” Fels, per the Foundation website:

helped found the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS-PA) in 1884 when Philadelphia was a major port of entry for Eastern European Jews fleeing persecution. Though a major funder and founder of Jewish organizations, Samuel believed in serving all, regardless of race or religion, wanting to build community and shared prosperity. In 1912, he began contributing to NAACP and in 1916, sent them funds to support their campaign opposing “Birth of a Nation.”

The Emergency Release Fund is a “mutual aid fund dedicated to getting LGBTQ+ and medically vulnerable individuals out of Rikers Island and ICE detention,” backed by people like Josh Goldfein; their would-be martyr, the preposterously-named Layleen Xtravaganza-Polanco, “a Black trans woman who died at Rikers Island during Pride month in 2019…illustrates a key tension within prisoner rights movements. Centering the experiences of transgender prisoners can motivate reform that fits within a broader fight for prison abolition.”

Prison. Abolition. We are talking about the inability of the government to incarcerate or detain any individuals from these protected classes because of “racism,” “transphobia,” and the familiar Cultural Marxist glossary. It all serves the purposes of the ruling class, uniform in its condemnation of “systemic racism” and tacit—sometimes explicit—support for globalized civil unrest. In a totally organic phenomenon that was in no way, shape, or form coordinated, not long after the riots kicked off in the US, reports came in of the same in the UK, France, New Zealand, and elsewhere, demonstrating against racism or something.

Naturally the coverage lauded the “protestors”—consider for example the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), which is funded by the likes of the Ford Foundation, the Open Society Foundations, the Swedish Postcode Foundation, the Dutch National Postcode Lottery, the Adessium Foundation, the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad), the Streisand Foundation, and the Omidyar Network, and from their website: “ICIJ is also a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.” Its media partners include:

  • SVT (Sweden)
  • Süddeutsche Zeitung (Germany)
  • Tempo (Indonesia)
  • The Asahi Shimbun (Japan)
  • The Australian Financial Review (Australia)
  • The Irish Times (Ireland)
  • The Malta Independent (Malta)
  • The Miami Herald (United States)
  • The Namibian (Namibia)
  • The New York Times (United States)
  • The Washington Post (United States)
  • ABC (Australia)
  • BBC Panorama (United Kingdom)
  • Fusion (USA)
  • Gazeta Wyborcza (Poland)
  • Guardian (United Kingdom)
  • Haaretz (Israel)
  • L’Espresso (Italy)
  • Le Monde (France)
  • TVNZ (New Zealand)
  • Univisión (United States)

Pretty comprehensive.

Further evidencing that the system is designed to oppress Black people, as Tim Dams wrote in Variety:

U.K. TV channels and radio stations are changing their programmes to mark “Blackout Tuesday”, following George Floyd’s death in police custody. Channel 4-owned 4 Music said it will pause its output once an hour throughout the day, and cease activity on its other platforms. “This a day to pause business as usual, take the time to reflect on recent events, and start a meaningful conversation around how to actively support and achieve progress for the whole black community,” said 4Music on Twitter today. ITV daytime show “This Morning” briefly went dark today, showing a black screen with the words “Black Lives Matter”. Host Phillip Schofield read out the message: “ITV say ‘We stand in solidarity with our black colleagues, storytellers and viewers around the world because #BlackLivesMatter #BlackOutTuesday.’” Meanwhile, ViacomCBS’s UK services MTV, BET, Comedy Central and Paramount Network will go dark across their platforms, including linear broadcast, at 7pm BST on Wednesday for 8 minutes and 46 seconds – the length of time it took for George Floyd to die.[4]

Speaking of which, the doctor hired by the family of George Floyd, the Jewish Michael Baden, did in fact conclude that his death was homicide; the medical examiner’s findings were that Floyd had fentanyl in his system and showed recent signs of methamphetamine usage when he died of a heart attack. That notwithstanding, how does this poor, voiceless, disadvantaged family get the money to hire Baden, who observed Jeffrey Epstein’s autopsy on his lawyers’ behalf, hosted an HBO show, testified for OJ Simpson’s defense, and contributed to examinations of John F. Kennedy, Martin Luther King, Jr., and John Belushi?

[1] Although predictably Congress was able to find billions of dollars to send to Israel, as Alison Weir reported for Mint Press on May 22nd, 2020: “The Senate Foreign Relations Committee quietly passed a bill…to give Israel a minimum of $38 billion over the next ten years despite the ongoing devastation to the U.S. economy caused by the coronavirus. The bill [S.3176] was passed by the committee under two unusual circumstances and with almost no public awareness. First, Senate Committee Chairman Jim Risch (R-Idaho) refused to allow a live stream of the meeting, despite the fact that the Senate Rules panel had recommended that extra efforts be taken to ensure public transparency while the Capitol is closed to the public and the presence of reporters is severely limited. The Senate’s Press Gallery Standing Committee of Correspondents had objected strongly to Risch’s decision. Second, the bill was passed without being named, debated, or even discussed, even though it would set into law the largest such aid package in U.S. history. There has been no mention of the bill by most media in the United States. The massive package is particularly noteworthy in light of the current devastation to the American taxpayers who will be footing the bill – over $10 million per day. In recent months approximately 30 million Americans have lost jobs, 100,000 small businesses have already closed forever, and over seven million are at risk of doing so. The bill was voted on as part of a package of 15 bills that were voted on “en bloc” (all together)…Neither did any Democrats on the committee object to requiring American taxpayers to give Israel what amounts to over $7,000 per minute when many Americans are suffering catastrophic financial difficulties.” Bipartisanship in action, folks!

[2] Vogel, Kenneth and Sarah Wheaton, “Major donors consider funding Black Lives Matter,” November 13, 2015. POLITICO.

[3] According to the January 2019 Atlanta Jewish Times article “Who’s in the Box? Jews!”: “Ten of 32 NFL owners have some publicly known Jewish heritage.”

[4] Dams, Tim, “UK Channels ITV, 4Music, MTV and Comedy Central Mark ‘Blackout Tuesday,’” June 2, 2020. Variety.

The ADL’s Queer Deer Is Censoring Speech at Twitch

/37 Comments/in /by

Many things can be said about Jews. However, it is rare to find a Jew that is so blatantly stereotypical for people clued in on the Jewish character, yet is just considered mentally ill by those ignorant of the Jewish question. Enter Steph Loehr, also known as Ferocious Steph, a transgender Jew who identifies as a deer. Steph Loehr is also a new administrator on the gaming platform Twitch. Loehr was hired as a Twitch moderator to be a part of their “Safety Advisory Council,” which in essence is Jews shutting down free speech. Not surprisingly, “they” or whatever his pronoun-of-choice is, is listed as a “Professional Community Leader” with the ADL where she is described as “Transgender, and an advocate for authenticity, challenging herself and others to find and express truth through vulnerability.” Shocker, I know.

TWITCH APPOINTS ADL-LINKED ‘TRANS DEER-GIRL’ TO SAFETY ADVISORY COUNCIL

Amazon-owned live-streaming site Twitch has reportedly appointed a transgender “deer-girl” with links to the ADL to its “Safety Advisory Council.” The streamer, known as “FerociouslySteph” on the site, argues that voice chat in video games is a tool of oppression and that “a lot of you gamers are actually white supremacists.” …

Twitch’s Safety Advisory Council described Loehr as an individual whose “fight for inclusivity includes creating a competitive team composed entirely of marginalized gamers, and vehemently opposing non-inclusive mechanics such as voice chat.”

Loehr has argued that voice chat mechanics in games negatively affect people from “marginalized groups” as they do not have a typical “cis white male” voice, making them a target for harassment.

“The concept that voice chat requires people to reveal their linguistic profile, which can contain a lot of identity information people can target you for harassment or judgment in game,” Loehr told Newsweek. “When using your voice provides a competitive advantage, marginalized gamers are placed in a lose/lose situation.” …

[In a video clip], Loehr states “I’m just not cool with white supremacy y’all…it’s really not that…I think a lot of you gamers are actually white supremacists, sorry, just a fact…of how I feel…which is my opinion.”

Loehr has spoken to Newsweek about his experience joining the council, stating: “I am getting harassed because I represent a lot of things people hate about diversity and acceptance.” Loehr added that the cause of the harassment is because “I am different and twitch has platformed me.”

Loehr continued to tell Newsweek: “People believe me to be mentally ill for being different. People believe I am a threat to their video game mechanics. People also don’t like me for my pride, and they don’t like that they have so little power over me.”

Twitch told Newsweek on Friday: “It is unfortunate to see a member of the advisory council targeted for harassment. The safety of our council members is our top priority and we’ve taken preventative measures to help ensure their safety and well-being. We are in close communication with each of the members and are working diligently to provide them with whatever support they may need.”

When I first read about this special deer, I couldn’t help but snicker. But it’s actually no cause for humor. Steph is neurotic, sexually deviant, and power hungry, all rolled into one dangerous package.  Loehr even stated, “In my spare time, I go outside to my yard, and I prance around, and I eat grass. And I just munch it, because it makes me in tune with my deer self” — all while pretending to eat grass on a live stream.

It has been scientifically proven that Jews are more likely to have schizophrenia than any other ethnic group.[1] After all, these are the people that spawned psychoanalysis, gender theory and radical feminism. Today, low-level Jews find all kinds of ways to infiltrate, gaming administration being one niche. Steph Loehr displays these traits of power lust when she proclaims on a live stream, “I’m not going anywhere. I have power. They can’t take it away for me. And honestly, you know, there are some people that should be afraid of me. And they are, because I represent moderation, diversity,” and “I’m going to come for harmful people If you’re a really shitty person, I’m going to stand up against you. Period. And Twitch has endorsed me to do that.”

This has the potential to be a second GamerGate scandal, and it doesn’t look pretty. Steph Loehr is very neurotic and very Jewish—obviously a very strongly identified Jew. And the fact that the ADL can get someone like that appointed to be a censor of online speech is chilling indeed.

[1] Efrati, Ido, IE, 10.04.2018, Scientists discovers gene that predisposed Ashkenazi Jews to schizophrenia

A Modest Proposal to End Systemic Racism

/69 Comments/in /by

“It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.”
― Jonathan Swift

It is truly a melancholy sight to walk through the great cities and towns of the West today and observe the countless corpses of Black scientists, engineers, and philosophers left behind by the brutal White officers of the law. In the long illustrious history of the African, replete as it is with towering artistic and architectural genius, and the most humane social advancements, we see him now at his lowest and most persecuted ebb. This is our bitter and enduring shame. We have, of course, always attempted to render this noble people completely unable to employ their myriad talents. For more than a century we’ve stopped them from working in the higher echelons of our society by requiring of them something entirely invented and fictitious (so-called “aptitudes”), and we have exerted our fiercest efforts in preventing them from gaining footholds in maths and physics. Even when they engaged in a race-wide conspiracy to consistently fake their test scores in order to come out lowest of all groups, we weren’t fooled by their attempt to sneak to the top of our society. Although stubborn in the past, we must confess now that we have blocked their progress at every turn, and we did this for the selfish reason that we always wanted a large, welfare-dependent class into which to dump our vast unwanted excess tax revenue.

Quite why the apex of our White fanaticism distilled in the police force remains, for now, a mystery. I think it is agreed by all parties, and attested by the celebrated African Studies pioneer (and, some say, a 17th-generation Holocaust survivor) Herschel Hertzberg, that the first Christ-like Black fell under a hail of malicious bullets sometime in the early 18th century, when the LAPD launched a daring and brutal raid for slaves among the skyscrapers and opera houses of placid Togo and Sierra Leone. It is a barely suppressed secret that these slaves and their technological prowess were later put to work designing and constructing every building in America. It is a sad fact, however, that even though Africans built America, from that first sorry moment in West Africa to the present, history has witnessed a steady progression of unwarranted and unnecessary police violence against this most peaceful and prosperous population. In fact, all current social problems in our deplorable civilisation can be attributed to this one pernicious reality. Gender bigotry, pay gaps, and even diabetes all have their origins in the fact our police forces have become obsessed with preventing Black people from breathing.

This sordid and murderous fixation among the police is the major question of our time, and since it strikes me that whoever could find out a fair, cheap, and easy method of solving this matter of unceasing systemic police racism would receive much public acclaim, I now venture my own modest proposal. I do so having turned my thoughts for many years upon this important subject, and maturely weighed the proposed schemes of our esteemed experts — all of which I have found lacking. Most important of all, I have carefully examined the apparent aims of Black civil unrest to determine precisely what it is that this oppressed people really desires. I believe my proposal will satisfy all parties and finally bring peace.

1. Reject Equality Under the Law

The foremost aspect of my scheme, and one of its great advantages, is that it finally aims to release the African from the bigotry of equality. It was one of the greatest tricks of the sneaky European to convince the African that being equal under the law was a good thing. Being “equal” was the bait, but the law was quite obviously the hook. The roots of our historical racial conflict are unquestionably that Blacks are unfairly placed under a system of laws in which they are asked to adhere to the same behavioral standards as other groups. This same system craftily paves the way for Blacks to become regarded as “criminals” when they innocently stumble into such commonplace situations as rape, robbery, and murder. The bigoted subjection of the gifted African-Americans (and their counterparts in Canada, Europe, and Australia) to equality under European-derived law has led to such injustices as disproportionate incarceration, and the spreading of fantastical stereotypes of Blacks as prone to violent and impulsive behavior. Only knowledgable observers, aware of the peace, prosperity and innovation that has come to be the byword for modern Africa, can discern that there is something horribly amiss in this situation.

The Black population has cried out, and I alone seem to have listened. The first step of my proposal is therefore to remove the burden of law from the Black population. The immediate benefits are obvious. The phenomenon of malicious “Karens” calling the police when they feel intimidated by loitering or advancing Blacks will disappear into history where it belongs. These bigoted women can call the police all they want, but upon receiving an elementary description of the stalker, the police would be forced to hang up. The law will simply not apply to those of African origin. It should be obvious that no harm will come from such a simple and beautiful measure, and only benefits can abound. Under the existing system, Black men who corner and verbally or physically intimidate White women can be made to feel vulnerable and alienated when that woman calls the police in sheer terror. This dynamic is obviously a major driver of Black emotional damage, and other forms of social injustice. Under the new arrangement, however, Black stalkers would be spared such indignities, and the woman would be secure in the knowledge that no matter what happens to her thereafter, at least no crime will be committed.

White female fear must be ignored if social justice is to prevail

 2. Adequate Compensation

A potential problem might arise in the event that a police officer accidentally but fatally harms an African-American during the course of his duties policing the uncontrollable behavior of Whites. In this regard, my careful analysis of recent Black demands leads me to suggest a scheme of social and material compensation for Black lives. Black Lives Matter — we know this, but how much do they matter? Only once the current phase of peaceful protest comes to a conclusion will we know the true tally, but rough guidelines can be discerned in the compensation thus far acquired for the life of St. George of Floyd. Using a combination of estimates and confirmed city figures, the average African-American death at the hands of a White amounts to around 1,569 pairs of athletic shoes, 2,962 gallons of alcoholic beverages, approximately 865 high-end phones and tablets, around $2 million in designer label clothing, between 30–50 badly beaten Whites, the entire contents of several low-cost supermarkets, and somewhere in the region of 100 fully incinerated buildings.

London Riots, 2011: Sports footwear has long demonstrated emotional healing properties for the African

Under my proposal, and for the sake of future social justice and harmony, a reserve of compensatory items must be held in the care of every city government, where they can be dispensed in the event of an accidental Black fatality. A suitable area within the city, comprising roughly of six or seven blocks, should be set aside in such fashion that emotionally-attacked Africans can, at a moment’s notice, assuage their mental anguish by, for example, breaking into a pre-prepared warehouse full of well-displayed sports footwear, and launching cathartic raids on faux Target supermarkets replete with actors portraying fleeing staff. Local shooting ranges might also be converted to offer the therapeutic breaking of glass to Black citizens. Through their use of such edifying provisions, Black people can not only display their maturity and ancient wisdom, but also set a stellar example to other groups about how people should react when they feel aggrieved. 

3. Symbolic Change

Simply freeing Blacks from the law and providing them with the healing tools of chaos is, of course, far from sufficient to redress the many thousands of years of oppression that we have brought upon these children of the sun. It should be obvious to any sane observer that the best way to heal racial divisions is to encourage, and even force, one of the opposing parties to kiss the feet of the other. Only by such open displays of subservience and submission can we achieve true parity in social relations. A recent, and related, heartwarming development has been the removal of statues throughout the country, especially those of the notorious police officer Robert E. Lee. Along with righteously purloined Gucci accessories, this will go some way towards further soothing Black pain, but the question remains as to what might occupy the newly vacant plinths. My suggestion? That in the name of ending systemic racism, every plinth formerly used to commemorate White race-terrorists should be home now to a giant sculpture of a black foot. This black foot can then be ceremonially kneeled before, and White citizens of especially high standing can be made to approach and kiss the foot in an act of solemn racial reconciliation. This ceremony could be performed on one of the many days and months now dedicated to the Black population, especially on St. George Floyd Day which should surely now be instituted without delay.

An artist’s impression of what might soon be called the “Joycean Method” for social harmony

4. End of all Physical Contact Policing 

This aspect of my modest proposal isn’t directly linked to ending systemic racism, but it is an essential step in improving the social environment and making it safer for White allies to protest on behalf of Black victims. Social media has recently been awash with horrific footage of police officers touching, holding, and even moving or pushing peaceful protesters. These unprovoked assaults normally occurred in the midst of efforts at Black emotional healing, such as arson, looting, mass vandalism, and attempts to breach Secret Service barricades and encroach on the White House. While the measures proposed here would remove Black people from the burden of laws, White allies may still find themselves being physically touched by police while in the course of peaceful allyship. This can no longer be tolerated in a sane and just society. Moves must urgently be taken to end all unwanted physical contact between police officers and suspected “criminals,” with interaction between parties now based on one of the key precepts of our times: consent. Police officers can and should ask all suspects if they have permission to touch, hold, or restrain them, and they must be instructed during training that “No means No.”

5. Confront Capitalism

All progress on the proposals outlined above will, of course, depend on a successful confrontation  with capitalism. Thankfully, Blacks as revolutionary subjects of the class struggle have thus far been supported by the power of labor, in the form of Amazon, Apple, Coca-Cola, Ford, Facebook, LEGO, Sony, Microsoft, Citigroup, Nike, YouTube, most banks, the entertainment industry, and the overwhelming majority of the political establishment. Only by enlisting the support of brave allies like these can we ever hope to overcome The Man and topple the power structure. We obviously can’t ignore the equally vital contribution of our friends in Antifa, who innovated some of the early strategies that will undoubtedly lead to the collapse of the status quo. Consider, for example, the effectiveness of destroying the few examples of Black-built economic infrastructure in many towns and cities, along with the major stores that provided low-skill employment to the Black demographic. Sure, the major companies will have adequate insurance for all their liabilities, and probably won’t be harmed at all. But they may well decide that these areas are now too high-risk to attempt a re-opening, and so they’ll take their filthy capitalist jobs and facilities elsewhere, leaving Blacks to bask at last in freedom from local services, retail stores, and gainful employment. This was quite the stroke of genius from Antifa, and is one of the main reasons they’ve been applauded and supported by the groups listed above. They are simply indispensable to the cause of social harmony and the overthrow of capitalism. 

6. Clarity of Message

A particular concern of mine in recent days has been the lack of clarity surrounding the name “Black Lives Matter.” Africans have long been renowned for their high regard for the sanctity of the lives of their neighbors, something attested to by the famously low homicide rates within their communities. We see this also in the parasitical phenomenon of “White flight,” whereby Whites constantly seek to move to Black-dominant areas to share in the quietude and safety offered by those locations. Some doubts remain, however, as to the clarity and reach of the message of Black Lives Matter among Whites.

Is this clear enough? Unfortunately not.

Although streets in Washington D.C. have been renamed “Black Lives Matter,” and then literally covered with the slogan, it’s clear that someone, somewhere doesn’t understand that Black lives matter. They may not have heard the slogan. We know this because Black people continue to die in homicides, and the only explanation is that White people, and especially the police, haven’t received the message and therefore don’t value Black lives. It really shouldn’t need to be repeated here, but even when an African-American is peacefully protesting against the systemic racism of a police officer by passively rushing him and attempting to take his gun, the first thought in that officer’s head should always be: “Black Lives Matter.” It urgently needs to be made the first principle in all law enforcement training, and all self-defense methodologies at police academies should be adapted to include the “take the knee” posture. Only by total acquiescence to the physical assaults of so-called Black “criminals” can our communities find peace and security. To this end I’ve developed and copyrighted a short mantra that could be repeated by anxious police officers confronted by extremely peaceful protesters:

Forget the guns, Forget the knives,
What matters most are
Black Lives!©

Some law enforcement volunteers enjoying a mantra rehearsal session

 7. Dump Trump

This is one of the more controversial aspects of my proposal, but please bear with me. First, we have to acknowledge the fact that President Trump has single-handedly lowered Black unemployment since taking office by creating beautiful jobs, often in marketing the peaceful and much-loved State of Israel.

Towards Meaningful Black Employment: Marketing the Diverse, African-Loving Sate of Israel

Trump also recently took the unprecedented step of proclaiming June to be African-American Music Appreciation Month. Trump’s message: Black Music Matters. In the middle of a worldwide health scare, an economic crisis, and escalating systemic racism, we should concede that Trump offered thanks to Sam Cooke, Little Richard, Ray Charles and others for their “classic guitar riffs, memorable hymns and uplifting beats.” We also can’t forget the recent justice system reforms that released many Black “criminals” from prisons.

Trump, however, is not a friend of African-Americans. He repeatedly called for the National Guard to be deployed against peaceful African-American protests throughout the country, and expressed horror and disgust at the perfectly natural need for Blacks to find solace in Smart TVs and several new pairs of shoes. This should never be forgotten, and it has proven what Jewish and Antifa allies have often asserted: Orange Man Bad. We should, of course, always have known this. We can’t plead innocence now. All the hallmarks of Fascism were there to see:

  • Open opposition to intermarriage with Jews, especially in his own family
  • Repeated hostility toward Israel, our greatest in the Middle East and a beacon of human rights
  • Unwavering hostility toward LGBT+ dogma around the world
  • The launching of a worldwide campaign to promote anti-Semitism
  • Total suppression of Antifa, our greatest friends in the war against capitalism
  • Open support of pro-White activity
  • Repeated public opposition to multiculturalism and diversity
  • Opposition to all forms of immigration including hundreds of thousands of “skilled” foreign workers

We sleepwalked into the second coming of Hitler. We desperately need to get this man out of office.

8. Jewish Exemption 

It should be universally acknowledged that Jews aren’t White and should therefore be exempt from the obligations suggested for the White community. Jews have a long and storied history as friends of the Black community, from their ancient texts that lovingly jested that Blacks were cursed, to their attempts to bring huge numbers of their African entrepreneurial trade partners to the New World (under the guise of “slaves” to dupe the White oppressors). Even today these bonds remain strong. Where would Black people be today if it were not for the Jewish landlords, store owners, and pawn brokers that shape the very best of the world they live in. Even in Israel, African needs are met without even a request needing to be made. Just consider, for a moment, the thoughtfulness of an Israeli government that took the initiative to inject Ethiopian immigrants with birth control without troubling to ask. No other government would take such concern in the reproductive health of its Black population. And during the peaceful protests of the last week, we can be sure that Jewish allies were strongly represented among the Antifa peace brokers, urging Blacks again and again to take their rightful share from the bigoted Whites.

Natural Allies

9. Segregation of Problematic Whites 

This is probably the harshest and most radical of my proposals, and the one most likely to be fiercely contested by racists. It seems clear to me that some elements of the White population will simply never accept the proposals made here, and wish to irrationally remain in their bigotry. They will never agree to do their part to end systemic racism. At a certain point, I argue, we will have to accept that, and leave them to wallow in the decrepitude that their civilization is certain to decline to. One only needs to look at the European past to see the degraded state of the European without African influence.

Chaotic and disorderly scenes in a primitive medieval European shanty town

If Black lives don’t matter to these people then we will be forced to say that their lives don’t matter to us. They should be apportioned a vast tract of land in which they would be forced to live with one another, attempting in the inevitable chaos to build their own infrastructure — this time without Blacks building their entire country. You can already imagine their horror at the news that they would be condemned to an existence without the beneficent hand of multiculturalism. It will be a Hell on earth, but they will deserve it. For the rest of us, the end of systemic racism will usher in an age of beauty and peace, harmony and good will.

More on a Recent Article About COVID-19

/37 Comments/in /by

In late March, I wrote an article, posted here, on the public response to the COVID-19 virus called “Thoughts from a Leather Couch on Covid-19.”   My focus was on the U.S., as it will be in this writing.  I saw COVID, as I will call the article, as being about a breaking news story and felt pressed to get it out quickly, and I wrote it in a day.  I’m prone to be in-a-stew regretful about everything I write—“Why’d I say that?” “Why’d I leave that out?”  “What a piss-poor sentence that was”—and this rush job resulted in more than the usual number of laments.  But re-reading it now to put this article together, I’m OK with it, or sort of.

My surface impulse for writing COVID was to report what was going on with me sitting on my leather couch in my living room where I spend most all of my time in retirement with my laptop when I’m not trying to get some sleep and failing at it.  Enjoy your youth, because I’m here to tell you that if I’m typical, insomnia is a bitch in old age.  I was getting from politicians and big media that there is this giant menace threatening to wipe out millions of people if we didn’t stop everything we were doing and hide out in our basements.  Businesses were shut down, and the schools, and don’t you dare go to the beach, and the stock market had gone south.  I read The New York Times every morning over breakfast even though I know it’s a sophomoric propaganda rag.  I can’t shake the idea I grew up with that it’s the newspaper of record, and I like some of its non-front-page features like the movie reviews and, especially, the obituaries, which at my advanced age are the first things I read.  It’s sobering to get to where not only are you older than the president, you’re older than just about everybody that’s dying.  The Times was coming on about the virus like we had been invaded by Martians.

In my geriatric-and-counting long life, I’ve never experienced hysteria like the reaction to COVID-19.  I referred in COVID to the swine flu outbreak in 2009 and to the seasonal flu that kills tens of thousands every year, and made a brief allusion to a polio epidemic in my childhood—no lockdown with any of those.  I could have also referred to other virus outbreaks, including the Asian flu in the 1950s, and SARS and MERS and Ebola in recent years—no lockdowns there either.   Even the Spanish Flu in 1918, which killed millions, no lockdown.  I had assumed you quarantine sick people, but this time everybody was getting quarantined.   Really something else.

I Googled around on my laptop and it appeared to me that the numbers of deaths from COVID-19 didn’t support the gigantically-over-the-top response to it.  It looked as if the people dying were primarily old with serious pre-existing health conditions—in nursing homes, a lot of them—and even with them, I was wondering if most of them hadn’t died with COVID-19 rather than from it.  As far as I could tell, virtually nobody under forty—or was fifty, or sixty?—was dying from this virus.  Yet I went to the supermarket and everybody was wearing a mask and the toilet paper was sold out.  It looked like a movie set; I half-expected Tom Cruise to come around the corner.

Nine weeks later, I’m still mightily intrigued by the COVID-19 phenomenon—which is starting to wind down some–but I’m clear now that what most propelled me to write COVID was to get into authoritarianism and statism.  Both of them rub me the wrong way, and they’ve been concerns of mine for a long time.  This writing expands on my basic impulse for writing COVID.

By authoritarianism, I refer to the unquestioned obedience to authority; somebody “higher up” calling the shots at the cost of someone’s personal freedom and self-determination, and that person going along with it.  Statism gets at government overreach in its control of social and economic affairs.  It especially grates on me when the government is just a few people, or even one, making decisions and dictating to people, and when it is distant from everyday life in the home, the neighborhood, and the community.

With both authoritarianism and statism, there’s invariably someone one-up on you in worth.   He (or she) is more informed than you, or smarter, or wiser, or on a higher moral plane, or something, and knows how you should think and conduct your life better than you do.  With COVID-19, Dr. Anthony Fauci, who is on the news way more than you or I are, steadily made pronouncements on COVID-19.  I remember Dr. Fauci from way back—he had dark hair then—saying that AIDS was a heterosexual disease.  I’m serious, I went straight to my doctor and blurted, “I have AIDS!”  He replied, “Ah, go home.”

Sometimes they don’t even pretend to be worthy.  They have simply gotten themselves into a slot in the social machinery that makes them think they are a big deal and can play God.  “I’m Governor Cuomo.  Look at me when I’m talking to you.  Quit checking to see if I have nipple piercings.  Shut up and do what I tell you!”   As Aristotle once said, what is, is.   Bernie Sanders may be my senator here in Vermont, but I knew him back when he was on welfare and trying to get a job as a carpenter.  Even though Bernie has filing-card-shouted his way to a successful political career, it’s still him, he’s not fooling me, and I not deferring to him.

A feature of authoritarianism and statism is intimidation.    Don’t get the idea that what’s coming at you is merely a suggestion. You’d better do whatever it is or else, with the “or else” ranging from disapproval and condemnation and exclusion (which includes “Clean out your office and hand over your keys, you’re gone”) to jail time.

COVID dealt a lot with authoritarianism and statism.   I used the metaphor of people becoming race horses with blinders, only looking straight ahead of them as they are driven in the direction their jockeys (politicians, the media) want them to go.  There was the example of the horrific and barbaric firebombing of civilians in Tokyo by killer supreme, General Curtis LeMay, during WWII because Franklin Roosevelt “knew” that kind of atrocity was our only recourse.  In 1950, Harry Truman decided (where was Congress? where were the American people?) to give American young men no choice but to travel 6,000 miles in order to kill and die in 25 below zero weather in North Korea.  54,000 Americans just starting out in their lives were slaughtered in Viet Nam because super-intelligent Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara thought it was good idea.

In COVID, I said I was getting a distinct déjà vu feeling with this COVID-19 response.  Judging from historical precedent, standing aside and letting the “smart guys” and “top guys” order people around might just get you unemployed and standing in a bread line and me trying to figure out how to pay for my daughter’s college education with my retirement account reduced to a dollar-and-a-half.

During the COVID-19 mania, state governors have had a good time—I think they get off on it—playing dictator.   Besides New York, I’m thinking particularly of the governors of New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Washington. As I write this, the governor of Pennsylvania is in a total snit because a professional football player for the Pittsburgh team in the National Football League, Ben Roethlisberger, got a haircut without his permission.   A couple days ago, it was, “Close that beauty salon down this minute or I’ll castigate you and put you behind bars!”  What is it about hair care that especially energizes them?   Something all these governors have in common is that they are Democrats (as were FDR, Truman, and Lyndon Johnson during Viet Nam).   Lately, I’ve noted some voices of protest to what is going on and it’s been heartening.

Speaking of Democrats, in recent days as I have been putting this article together, the death in Minneapolis of a black man after a white police officer knelt on his neck to hold him down when he allegedly resisted arrest has resulted in massive rioting and looting in multiple cities across America.  I was sickened and angered by the first impulse of the Democratic mayor of Minneapolis and the Democratic governor of Minnesota to stand aside and let rioters burn and steal what others had created, and for the national Democratic Party leadership to cheer them on.  When will whites get that modern-day Democrats disparage and diminish and, when things get tough, abandon them?   I’d like think that this latest tragic racially-charged episode in American life will prompt whites to wake up to reality.

If nothing else, the COVID-19 crisis has surfaced the dream come true of the left: East Germany before the fall of the Berlin Wall.  Check out the 2006 German film “The Lives of Others,” which is set in East Germany.  There it is: the same smug, self-congratulatory, authoritarianism and statism.   And I’m not just referring to electoral politics.  What’s gone on over the past few months in my daughter’s public high school is an illustration of what happens when you unleash NPR listeners and Obama fans (that’s who school people are).  As I reported in COVID:

With this health crisis, it has been a series of edicts from the school administrators and teachers in my daughter’s school; no explanations, no rationales.  No more classes until, first, March 23rd, and then April 27th, and, now, June 19th.  No teaching the regular curriculum until April 20th, which will then be taught on a remote basis.  Why, you ask?   None of your business.  Don’t contact us.  We’re working on it; we’ll get back to you.   

I ended COVID with a quote from a journalist from the ‘1920s and ‘30s, H.L. Menken.   “The urge to save humanity,” Mencken pointed out, “is almost always a false-face for the urge to rule it.”  I would modify Mencken’s quote to bring it up to date: “The left’s professed aim of saving humanity is a thinly disguised effort to rule it, and in the process, bring white people to their knees.”

A Fish Called Wakanda, Part 3: The Riots, the Virus, and BlackRock

/30 Comments/in /by

Go to Part 1.
Go to Part 2.

While everyone is parsing the details of these incidents at face value, the Jewish capitalist class has quietly consolidated its control of the country in a process that has been a long time in the making, since at least 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve. The American military and its client states and proxies have subsequently been used to erode national sovereignty and opposition to the new world order with intermittent aggression in the century-plus since, the country having tragically been coopted and colonized, the body doing the bidding of the parasite-riddled brain, sometimes even causing significant self-harm. God forbid Whites try to defend themselves while Blacks and other non-Whites are goaded into racially-motivated violence, either—the judicial branch will throw the book at the Whites! A terrified and cowed native populace is beneficial to the ruling class in all sorts of ways, from the economic to the population control and demoralization aspect.

In the midst of all of this manufactured racial tension, lawmakers have actually advanced the idea that Whites’ calling the police on non-Whites can be scaled-up into a hate crime, meaning we would literally have no defense against these people in any official capacity. We would be the ones punished for being attacked and far from even defending ourselves, requesting law enforcement’s intervention! Granted the punishment would be for if “bias is involved…[in] the charge of fabricating a criminal report,” but given what we’ve seen regarding the flexible definitions (and very often fabrications in their own right) of bias, and the coercive methods of law enforcement in treating White victims of non-White crime, this is a potentially massive land mine. Even if nothing happens, you’re now on the radar as a thought criminal for daring to inform the police of threat to your person by one of the protected individuals who also cherish self-governance, the Constitution, family values, and free market capitalism by way of Steve Sailer’s Magic Dirt. It’s a pretty remarkable thing. We must be able to defend ourselves, and the increasingly totalitarian government is trying to make that as difficult as possible, especially through the restriction of firearms.

These further “hate crime” proposals following the incident between Amy Cooper and the individual The Washington Post characterizes as “a birdwatcher”—a lie so preposterously egregious it nearly rivals that of the jogging enthusiast Ahmaud Arbery—are the definition of anarcho-tyranny, but Jewish Director of something-it-sounds-like-the-ADL-created at Cal State-San Bernardino called the Center for Study of Hate and Extremism Brian Levin believes that, “A close, if uncomfortable, examination of racism’s prevalence might be more fruitful.” Indeed, fruitful for further control of the White population. Those who “hate hate” have, per The Washington Post, proposed:

Legislation that would criminalize calling police as an act of racial prejudice… New York State Assemblyman Felix W. Ortiz (D-Brooklyn) on Wednesday revived a bill he first proposed in 2018 to add a hate-crime enhancement to the charge of fabricating a criminal report if bias is involved…Four states — New Jersey, Minnesota, Oregon and Washington — have recently considered bills that would criminalize calling the police when crimes haven’t occurred, some specifying calls that “unlawfully discriminate” or target “protected classes.”…Lawmakers wrote in the bill that false reporting has been “weaponized” and often against “protected classes.”[1]

So there you have it, straight from the horse’s mouth: Blacks and Browns are, in fact, protected classes, jockeying for position with homosexuals as favored, but always below Jews in the pecking order.

All of this while the usurious usurpers privatize what they can and dictate terms to a government that is bought and sold. Contemporary tensions stoked to the boiling point whenever it serves the ruling class, in the midst of inevitable race riots and media-generated hysteria directing eyeballs away from the seismic shifts behind the scenes as “money managers” like BlackRock become, to quote William Birdthistle, “a fourth branch of government.” BlackRock, Vanguard Group Inc., and State Street are called the Big Three because they hold roughly 80% of all indexed money. Graham Steele, formerly of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, says, “They are so intertwined in the market and government that it’s a really interesting tangle of conflicts. In the advocacy community there’s an opinion that asset managers, and this one in particular, need greater oversight.” With corona collapse imminent, as Annie Massa and Caleb Melby write, the government went back to the same polluted well as in 2008:

When the Federal Reserve needed Wall Street’s help with its pandemic rescue mission, it went straight to Larry Fink. The BlackRock Inc. co-founder, chairman, and chief executive officer has become one of the industry’s most important government whisperers…Fink possesses a power that’s more technocratic. BlackRock, the world’s largest money manager, can do the things governments need right now. The company’s new assignment is a much bigger version of one it took on after the 2008 financial crisis, when the Federal Reserve enlisted it to dispose of toxic mortgage securities from Bear Stearns & Co. and American International Group Inc. This time it will help the Fed prop up the entire corporate bond market by purchasing, on the central bank’s behalf, what could become a $750 billion portfolio of debt… BlackRock…was handed three Fed assignments without any competitive process—though the Fed plans to rebid the contracts once the programs are in full swing. BlackRock will manage portfolios of corporate bonds and debt ETFs. It will do the same for newly issued bonds—sometimes acting as the sole buyer—and for up to 25% of bank-syndicated loans. And it will purchase commercial mortgage-backed securities from quasi-government agencies such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac…[BlackRock] scooped up Barclays Global Investors, including its iShares ETF division, in the fallout from the 2008 crisis. That gave BlackRock a stronghold in low-cost index funds, transforming it into the world’s largest asset manager almost overnight—and supercharging more than a decade of growth..[2]

So BlackRock exploded in profitability while the average American’s net worth sharply declined, followed shortly after by their life expectancy thanks to the same group pushing opioids on the White population. And while the media incessantly pumps race war porn and the population is sufficiently distracted—and nearly just as usefully divided—the Judeo-capitalists are able to further tighten control:

[BlackRock] is ubiquitous in markets for everything from passive, index-linked products to hands-on mutual funds, with $6.5 trillion in assets under management…Beyond money management, BlackRock’s software platform, Aladdin, appealed to the Fed…Bloomberg LP, the parent company of Bloomberg News, sells financial software that competes with Aladdin…One arm of BlackRock knows what the Fed is buying, while other parts of the business participating in credit markets could benefit from that knowledge…BlackRock’s contract with the Fed also acknowledges that senior executives “may sit atop of the information barrier” and “have access to confidential information on one side of a wall while carrying out duties on the other side.”[3]

There’s your free market at work! Further exposing the sham of any real Democrat-Republican divide, Massa and Melby continue:

The money manager built a powerful advocacy arm. Its sphere of influence reaches beyond the central bank to lawmakers, presidents, and government agency heads from both political parties, though its hiring leans Democratic. Bloomberg found only a handful of current BlackRock executives who came out of the George W. Bush administration, but more than a dozen Barack Obama alumni. These include Obama’s national security adviser, senior adviser for climate policy, the former Federal Reserve vice chairman he appointed, and numerous White House, Treasury, and Fed economists.[4]

Oh yeah, and this sphere of influence now encompasses most of the Western world:

The Bank of Canada tapped BlackRock in March as an adviser for its purchases of commercial paper, the short-term debt that companies use to fund day-to-day expenses such as payroll. Last month [April 2020] the European Union hired the money manager to advise it on how to incorporate environmental, social, and governance practices into the way EU banks manage risk.[5]

On top of all of this, or more appropriately tying into all of this, the coronavirus continued to rage, with its spread used as a pretense to funnel more money to migrants who very possibly doubled as carriers of the disease! In late March, NGOs Islamic Relief, Save the Children, and Catholic Relief Services ensured through the Start Fund that 7,000 Roma and “new migrants from Greece” in Albania received cash payments ostensibly as a response to the coronavirus. The Start Fund is collectively owned and managed by the Start Network’s members; these include in addition to the aforementioned three organizations World Jewish Relief, ActionAid, CARE, Muslim Aid, Oxfam, several Caritas branches, War Child, and the International Rescue Committee (IRC), among others. Its primary donors are: the Rockefeller Foundation, Dutch Aid, UK Aid, the IKEA Foundation, Irish Aid, the German Federal Foreign Office, Jersey Overseas Aid, the Government of Belgium, the Republic of Estonia, and the European Union Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO). There is also the Migration Emergency Response Fund (MERF), “a rapid response context-specific contingency fund operated and managed by the Start Network, its members, and in collaboration with its donor, UK’s Department for International Development (DFID)…and is delivered as part of a consortium project with the Danish Refugee Council (DRC) and the International Rescue Committee (IRC)…The objective of the MERF is to rapidly respond to acute and emerging gaps and changes in needs along [the] migration route.”

As I’ve said before and I’ll say again: the population replacement project stops for no pandemic. Clearly the same goes for media-fomented race riots and the machinations of the plutocracy.

[1] Sacchetti, Maria, Shayna Jacobs, and Abigail Hauslohner, “Public outrage, legislation follow calls to police about black people,” May 27, 2020. The Washington Post.

[2] Massa, Annie and Caleb Melby, “In Fink We Trust: BlackRock Is Now ‘Fourth Branch of Government,’” May 21, 2020. Bloomberg.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Ibid.

A Fish Called Wakanda, Part 2: The Pervasiveness of Neo-Liberalism

/11 Comments/in /by

Go to Part 1.

So the Chamber of Commerce Republican talking points have even infected the Eastern Bloc. Even Italy has announced a pathway to legal residency for tens of thousands of “undocumented migrants” through work permit applications in the agricultural sector and for “domestic helpers.” Most agricultural production of seasonal fruits and vegetables in the EU Mediterranean region relies on migrant labor. In 2015, just under half of the workforce employed in agriculture was comprised of foreign nationals; 430,000 workers—over half—did not have an official contract.

It is not my intention here to demoralize the reader, but simply to illustrate how pervasive neo-liberalism has become, and how it poses an existential threat to the survival of Occidental Man. It is so dangerous because it is a total system encompassing ideological and economic aspects, much like communism but more insidious because it is less obvious and does not call attention to itself as revolutionary, though its beneficiaries are the same. It works in inversion and “soft power,” and whether it be the laissez-faire religion of the faux-Right that “necessitates” Jamaican apple-pickers in Massachusetts and North African strawberry-pickers in Spain or the re-distributionist and “global uplift” siren song of the Left, they inevitably converge in the tight grip of the ruling class.

Migrant labor, especially, has proven extremely useful to the ruling class for a variety of reasons:

In the mid-twentieth century, guest-worker programs were popular in both the United States and Western Europe, where labor shortages frustrated seasonal labor recruitment. Such programs came to an end in the 1960s and 1970s as political opposition grew and economic crises deepened on both sides of the Atlantic (Martin, 2003; Castles, 2006). But talk of guest workers resurfaced when the agri-food industry reorganized in the 1980s. By the 1990s, countries like Germany and Spain were reinventing guest-worker programs for twenty-first century economic needs and political realities (Castles, 2006)…The contemporary appeal of guest workers is more or less the same as it was mid-century. Employers can access a steady supply of low wage workers, control workers through the terms of the contract, adjust the size of their work-force with ease, dismiss guest workers as they see fit, mitigate anti-immigrant sentiment in the local community, and avoid some of the social anxieties that surround undocumented migration. The advantages of guest workers are perhaps all the more critical in an era of ‘lean’ agri-food production, since securing a flexible, low-wage work-force is central to employers’ ability to provide quality, low cost products to the market-place (Rogaly, 2008). Guest workers may also prove critical to new immigrant destinations, where the presence of immigrants has become politically and socially contentious.[1]

This strategy of doing an end-around people’s concerns regarding immigration while still serving both the ideological impetus and the Chamber of Commerce interests is central to neo-conservatism; in essence, one gets the “deep concern” voiced over immigration, and maybe token resistance on that front, but the numbers still come, just in a different form. Thus the totally useless distinction of legal versus illegal immigration, for example, especially in the U.S. where powerful forces are acting to erase the distinction (drivers’ licenses, medical care, etc.). In a demographic war, and with a totally illegitimate system, who cares if the invading force is arriving via “legal” means if the legality itself is questionable at best?

What’s more, in an anarcho-tyrannical system, one where the favored population groups are given carte blanche to assail the native populace with impunity, the act of defending oneself finds them in the grips of this illegitimate system where judicial warfare has become yet another open front to attack Whites. The judicial branch has become not just subject to politicization and agenda advancement— “lived experience” a substitute for knowledge, expertise, capability, and objectivity (e.g., Sonia Sotomayor) becoming more prevalent, more pronounced, and more nakedly partisan—but when the constitutionally-enshrined protections of our society are no longer respected, when the laws no longer apply to certain people and justice is no longer blind, when the system itself can be perverted to create a privileged class—that system has been corrupted and is fundamentally rotten.

Furthermore, the laws themselves are meaningless in such an environment. How can you respect the ever-changing code of a system that exists to destroy you? It’s hard to feel anything but contempt when the same higher-ups of “law enforcement” who ensure that our people are thrown in jail for being in the wrong place at the wrong time with the wrong skin color is drawn into open conflict with the combatants the ruling class has imported and/or catered to and encouraged with their rhetoric. It is especially difficult to feel anything but contempt when the Jewish mayor of Minneapolis Jacob Frey claims that the rioters torching police headquarters are morally justified. My only sympathies lie with the regular people caught in the crossfire, and this includes some of the rank-and-file police put in the impossible position of their sworn duty to serve and protect, and what they’re being demanded to do (or not do, as the case may be in standing down). They never asked for this and they do not deserve it.

James Mason wrote about the first stages of open war over thirty years ago with the Vibrants as Richard Houck calls them in his excellent Liberalism Unmasked, acting out their hostilities against the system’s other phalanx of soldiers. What we need to do at this juncture is very simple: get out of their way, consolidate, and fortify ourselves. Get yourself into a position where you are near family and friends in defensible locales, away from the blast radius of “diversity,” and become as self-reliant as humanly possible. The system is doomed to fail, and you do not want to be dragged down with it. It’s only a matter of time, and whatever we can do to hasten the process, the better, for the collateral damage will be extensive and will only get worse the more time goes on. I am not saying we should be moved to violence—this is foolish for a host of reasons. What I am saying is that we must continue to expose the system for the sham it is, and make people see the illegitimacy of the arrogant ruling cabal who barrage us with trash about being “all in this together.”

The US government itself is financing the migrant invasion the tough-talking Donald Trump was elected to stop! The State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) spends over $3.2 billion annually to help fund mass migration projects—and even in this endeavor, Israel finds a way to get a slice of the pie, as in $7.5 million in fiscal year 2018 for the Humanitarian Migrants to Israel (HMI) Program, which “provides financial resources for the resettlement of humanitarian migrants from the Former Soviet Union (FSU), Eastern Europe, Africa, the Near East and other countries of distress [read: Jews] in Israel.” The grant is implemented by the United Israel Appeal (UIA) through Jewish Agency for Israel (JAFI) who manage a network of absorption centers throughout the country.” Almost $1.6 billion went to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and nearly $188.5 million went to the International Organization for Migration (IOM) in FY2018.

From the “philanthropic” side, the MacArthur Foundation has given several grants to the UN for the Global Forum on Migration and Development as well as sponsoring workshops and seminars on “international migration law” and for the United Nations University’s Institute for Environment and Human Security (UNU-EHS), in collaboration with CARE International, to “undertake a special outreach effort for its Guatemala case study on the impact of climate change on migration in the region.” As we will see shortly, it is the US government and the World Bank, not climate change, that is facilitating Guatemalans’ migration north. CARE received nearly $12 million from the PRM in fiscal year 2018. CARE International’s multilateral funding partners are:

  • European Union (EU) through the European Commission Humanitarian Office (ECHO)
    and Directorate General for Development and Co-operation (DG DEVCO).
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO)
  • International Labour Organisation (ILO)
  • International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD)
  • United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)
  • United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM)
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)
  • United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)
  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT)
  • United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR)
  • Steering Committee for Humanitarian Response (SCHR)
  • The World Bank (WB)
  • World Health Organization (WHO)
  • World Food Programme (WFP)

Their bilateral partners are:

As one example of a CARE project, the NGO in partnership with the UK Department for International Development runs a cash transfer project for women in rural Zimbabwe, where each month, households receive a cash payment into a virtual wallet on their mobile phone. That’s it.

The State Department’s PRM also disburse funds to several of the major NGO enablers of migrants into Europe, such as the Norwegian Refugee Council (nearly $11.9 million), Caritas Switzerland (nearly $1.5 million), Première Urgence Internationale in France ($4 million), and the Danish Refugee Council (nearly $9.2 million), and other major NGOs facilitating mass migration into the West such as the International Rescue Committee ($40.7 million), Catholic Relief Services ($10.2 million), the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS—over $8.1 million),[2] and the Pan American Development Foundation ($6.65 million).

Another US State Department PRM funding priority is the Refugee Solidarity Network (over $1.6 million in FY2018): “Since 2014 RSN and sister organization Refugee Rights Turkey have benefitted greatly from PRM support, with the goal of assisting Turkey implement its new migration and asylum framework.” Also partnering are Naripokkho and the Center for Legal Aid Bulgaria, whose mission, per their website’s description:

Is to promote the rights of migrants, refugees and asylum seekers on the territory of Bulgaria, through legal aid and advocacy. Since 2009, the CLA has promoted progressive legislative reform and raised awareness on asylum, migration and integration. CLA provides pro bono legal consultations to asylum seekers, refugees and migrants, as well as legal representation in administrative and judicial proceedings on the national and European levels. CLA also engages in research and monitoring, to support their advocacy initiatives, and participate in national, regional and Europe-wide networks.

RSN is a member of:

  • International Detention Coalition (IDC): “A unique global network. Of over 400 civil society organizations and individuals in more than 90 countries, that advocate for, research and provide direct services to refugees, asylum-seekers and migrants affected by immigration detention.”
  • International Council of Voluntary Agencies (ICVA): “A platform for increased collaboration and coordination between NGOs and other humanitarian actors, which is crucial to improving the lives of communities affected by humanitarian crisis.”
  • The Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network (APRRN): “An open and growing network consisting of more than 340 civil society organizations and individuals from 28 countries committed to advancing the rights of refugees in the Asia Pacific region. APRRN aims to advance the rights of refugees and other people in need of protection through joint advocacy, capacity strengthening, resource sharing and outreach.”

They have also received support from: Google, as “RSN benefits from the support of Google Ad Grants for Non-profits, which supports RSN’s outreach, information dissemination, and fundraising activities”; BannerBuzz, which “supports RSN with marketing and communications needs”; the Tent Foundation, “The grant provided an opportunity to further develop programming at RSN’s sister organization Refugee Rights Turkey, and make connections with advocates working on child protection in neighboring Greece and Bulgaria”; and the Open Society Foundation Justice Initiative: “Since 2018, OSJI has worked with and supported RSN on efforts to respond to the Rohingya refugee crisis affecting South and Southeast Asia. OSJI and RSN are carrying out research and capacity development with civil society actors in the region.”

In Central America, the US government and the World Bank have been very active in subsidizing migration north into America. As Kevin Sieff reports:

The winding roads into the valley of Nebaj are lined with advertisements for cheap loans. Banks and cooperatives and microfinance operations make their pitches… here in the Guatemala Highlands, the epicenter of the country’s migrant exodus, those loans often fund a different activity, the region’s most profitable: smuggling migrants north to the United States…What enables those payments is a vast system of credit that includes financial institutions set up and supported by the United States and the World Bank, part of the global boom in microfinance over the past two decades. The U.S. government and the World Bank have each extended tens of millions of dollars in funding and loan guarantees, money that helped create what is now Guatemala’s biggest microfinance organization, Fundación Génesis Empresarial, and backed one of its largest banks, Banrural…The International Finance Corporation, an arm of the World Bank, lent the foundation $10 million last year [2018] to “broaden access to finance for micro and small businesses.”…Compartamos, a Mexican bank…  also received a flurry of USAID grants. It later stirred controversy for imposing interest rates of roughly 100 percent per year… Throughout the 1980s and 1990s, development organizations devoted growing resources to what advocates called “access to credit” or “financial inclusion.” In 2006, the Bangladeshi economist Muhammad Yunus, one of the forefathers of microfinance, won the Nobel Peace Prize for his “efforts to create economic and social development from below.”[3]

So this is what “financial inclusion” looks like. Once again we see the ideology of liberalism and the realities of neo-liberal economics working hand-in-glove to advance the interests—with interest!—of the ruling class.

Speaking of interest, just as with the Great Recession, instead of genuine conversations occurring in the mainstream about the detonation of the standard of living in favor of an almost-unfathomably wealthy plutocratic class and a Ponzi scheme masquerading as an economy, Americans were treated to various manufactured “incidents,” such as the one involving a man with a variety of pre-existing conditions who somehow was able to say “I can’t breathe” a chemist’s dozen times; and then there are the “hands-up-don’t-shoot” and “honest conversations” about the “difficulties of race in America”—destructive nonsense that masked trillions of dollars being funneled into the hands of the private equity magnates scrapping the country for parts.

With Ahmaud Arbery and George Floyd, plus the Amy Cooper Central Park dog-pile, the media created massive outcry against “systemic racism” and stoked anti-White hatred as perfect outlets for the frustration felt by so many with a system that is in fact using and exploiting them, but in ways that are clearly not understood. In buying into the media narrative and acting out their grievances in a typically violent fashion, the ruling class’s favored voting blocs/hyper-consumers/foot soldiers unwittingly do their bidding, acting out not against the system that is exploiting them, but the extant population the ruling class is trying to replace! Adding insult to injury, virtually all of these would-be martyrs are felons and general low-lifes. Their biographies sufficiently sanitized, these aspiring rappers or whatever the media says rather than their actual “professions,” the Democratic establishment shamelessly panders to the “demands” of the mob without ever meeting them, their “concerns” given frustration through looting and wanton violence. This rioting is often also encouraged by Black political figures in a weird kind of infantilizing where they must be given “space to vent their frustrations” or some such thing, although the torching of their own environs does in fact resemble a lethal version of a toddler’s temper tantrum. Interestingly enough, the mob’s concerns over “systemic racism” always seem to involve looting stores for televisions and such.

Said concerns are favored even by the champagne socialists’ Messiah the Jewish carpenter Bernie Sanders, who despite being a buffoon, once addressed genuine working-class concerns and raised important questions about wealth inequality and the practices of Wall Street; he now seems to have been co-opted and before meekly conceding his presidential bid yet again was running a campaign around the same manufactured social issues as the rest of the Democratic field. This noise obscures real issues caused primarily by global capital, and, for what it’s worth, Sanders’s particular ethno-religious identity—despite it not appearing to inform much of his self-perceived identity—awarded him far greater latitude than if I was in the same position. In-group differences are generally dealt with much differently than genuine threats to the status quo, and Sanders’s inherent meekness and sound and fury signifying nothing were never a genuine threat.

The public-private debate is another false dilemma. Real nations with racial and ethnic identities, traditions, and values have become nothing but GDP farms; screaming about privilege and various inequalities—easily explained by biological differences between the races and sexes—masks the real inequalities generated by a society predicated on nothing but corporate tax cuts and investment banking. Brown people are being exploited, but not in the way the establishment spins it. White people are being exploited, too, and Blacks, and Yellows, and Browns…If there is a commonality between the races, it’s this: we’re all being screwed by the same people.

The difference is, in Western nations, indigenous Whites are being targeted for oblivion, and the government bestows special privileges in hiring and college admissions and Whites’ largess via taxes, sweat, and blood on—and a dual legal system that grants special latitude to—non-Whites. For now. In their own countries, however, self-determination is not allowed. Any nation that tries to wander off the neo-liberal plantation is either destroyed or quickly brought to heel, or else feels the combined weight of the globalist establishment in the form of economic sanctions, media vilification, espionage, et cetera. Remember when Bolivia’s former President Evo Morales cut ties with Israel and recognized Palestine as a sovereign state? Well, one of the first moves of the “new government” after the American-, Brazilian-, and Israeli-backed coup was successful in November 2019 was to “normalize” relations with Israel; the reader may recall concurrent “unrest” in Venezuela fomented by the globalist axis as well the presence of IDF forces on Brazilian soil in January 2019 under the pretense of a “search-and-rescue” mission. (Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro is extremely close with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.) If you believe these events are all happening independent of each other then I have a Joe Rogan podcast for you to listen to!

The ultimate goal is the erasure of all distinct groups of people into a global mélange of deracinated serfs, minus one group of course. They bemoan terrorism in the country they stole, yet facilitate it abroad! In addition to the Jewish role in transformative immigration across the West, their use of the Western military apparatus to wreck and Balkanize every non-compliant country in the Middle East and increasingly South America has generated millions of real refugees who have to go somewhere right? And those numbers are then of course swollen by multiples with subsidized economic migrants.

Go to Part 3.

[1] Mannon, Susan E., et al., “Keeping Them in Their Place: Migrant Women Workers in Spain’s Strawberry Industry,” September 2, 2011, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture & Food, Vol. 19, No. 1, p. 84.

[2] According to HIAS, “In 1891, Jewish residents of Moscow, St. Petersburg and Kiev were expelled and many came to America. Ellis Island was the place of entry for these new arrivals. The Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society was there to facilitate legal entry, reception and immediate care for them.” According to their Wikipedia entry, “Working with the U.S. government, the government of Israel, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, and a host of non-governmental organizations, HIAS assists refugees with U.S. resettlement and follows through with immigrant integration and citizenship programs…In the United States, HIAS helps resettle refugees from around the world through a national affiliate network of Jewish agencies. It coordinates resettlement services, provides extensive integration and citizenship programs for Russian speaking refugees and immigrants, and gives scholarships to refugees. HIAS also advocates for immigration laws with a network of Jewish, interfaith, and other partners in Washington, DC and nationwide. Additionally, HIAS promotes educational initiatives that encourage Jewish communities to engage in refugee aid and services…In Latin America, HIAS provides full-service counseling, legal services, and humanitarian assistance for Colombian refugees fleeing to Ecuador and Venezuela. It also facilitates the resettlement and integration of refugees in Argentina and Uruguay. HIAS opened its newest Latin American office in Costa Rica, in February 2017… In Vienna and Kyiv, HIAS helps Jews and others from 43 countries receive protection and seek asylum or resettlement. In 2016 HIAS opened an office on the Greek island of Lesvos to provide legal services for refugees arriving by sea, predominantly from Syria.”

[3] Sieff, Kevin, “The migrant debt cycle,” November 4, 2019. The Washington Post.