Carry On Raping: How Leftists Are Ideal Folk to Tackle the Pathologies Created and Sustained by Leftism

/4 Comments/in , , /by

Here’s an important question with an obvious answer. Who is best-placed to tackle war-crimes committed against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip? Clearly, it’s the Israel Defense Forces or IDF. The IDF have all the necessary local knowledge and experience, having been focused on the Gaza Strip for many months now, extending outreach daily to the local inhabitants, and conducting extensive remodelling of local architecture and infrastructure.

Creating a rape-gang epidemic

Next, what about crime and corruption on the island of Sicily? Who’s best-placed to tackle that? Clearly it’s the veteran civic association known as the Mafia. Again, they have all the local knowledge and experience. No-one knows more about crime and corruption on Sicily than the Mafia, as all experts are agreed. Finally, what about vampirism in the Romanian province of Transylvania? Who’s best-placed to tackle that? Clearly, it’s the respected local leader Count Dracula. His personal experience of vampirism in Transylvania stretches back many centuries, as not even his most stubborn critics will deny. Owing to a rare medical condition, the Count can’t, alas, be active by daylight, but he more than makes up for that with his energy and enterprise in the hours of darkness.

So the principle is clear. Those best-placed to tackle crimes are those responsible for or complicit in the crimes. And it’s this clear principle that has guided Britain’s Labour party in its response to the Pakistani Muslim rape-gangs that have been hard at work for decades in British towns and cities controlled by the Labour party. After Elon Musk led an outcry about the rape-gangs at the beginning of 2025, the Labour government refused to commission a national enquiry, but promised that there would be “five local enquiries.” Labour were lying, of course. They were merely buying time as they plotted to shield both themselves and their ethnic pets from further scrutiny. As I’ve pointed out in article after article at the Occidental Observer, Labour and its leftism created the rape-gangs, have sustained and protected the rape-gangs, and have absolutely no intention of stopping the rape-gangs. If the current Labour government were honest about that, it would admit that its policy on the rape-gangs can be summed up in three simple words: “Carry On Raping.”

The Grift Report extends its congratulations to fiercely feminist Labour minister Jess Phillips

But Labour isn’t honest about its policy on the Pakistani Muslim rape-gangs, of course. Leftism is an ideology of lies and evasion, so the veteran Labour politician Jess Phillips was intent on lying and weaseling throughout the speech she made to parliament about “Tackling child sexual abuse and exploitation” on 8th April 2025. That date was carefully chosen, because parliament was about to shut down for the Easter Recess and the House of Commons was almost empty. Phillips has the Orwellian title of “Minister for Safeguarding Women and Girls,” which means that she is dedicated to harming women and girls. In particular, she’s dedicated to harming women and girls from the White working-class, whom the Labour party was founded to champion but now works tirelessly to destroy. In a pathological sense, here’s one of the most interesting parts of her speech:

We are developing a new best practice framework to support local authorities which want to undertake victim-centred local inquiries, or related work, drawing on the lessons from local independent inquiries like Telford, Rotherham and Greater Manchester. We will publish the details next month.

Alongside this we will set out the process through which local authorities can access the £5 million national fund to support locally-led work on grooming gangs. Following feedback from local authorities, the fund will adopt a flexible approach to support both full independent local inquiries and more bespoke work, including local victims’ panels or locally led audits into the handling of historic cases. (“Tackling child sexual abuse and exploitation,” speech by Jess Phillips, 8th April 2025)

It’s hard to know where to begin responding to even that short section of Phillips’ lying and weaseling speech, but I’ll begin by noting the “£5 million national fund.” Three days after the speech, the Labour government announced that it was sending an additional £450 million in military aid to Ukraine. So Labour can devote another huge sum to a futile war in a distant foreign land infamous for official corruption and theft, but can find only a paltry sum for “locally-led work” on a pathology afflicting its own traditional supporters in Britain. Res ipsa loquitur, as we say oop north. Next, note how often Phillips used the word “local” and its variants. In every case, it could be replaced by “Labour” or “leftist.” For example, what does “locally-led work” really mean? It means “leftist-led work.” That is, the “local authorities” — the Labour authorities — responsible for the pathology of Pakistani rape-gangs will be leading the response to it.

Leftist-led audits

There has been “feedback from local authorities,” you see. That is, leftists in rape-gang redoubts have sent “feedback” to leftists in London about how local leftists can be best supported by their leftist government in “tackling” pathologies created by leftism. It’s like the IDF in the Gaza Strip sending “feedback” to Tel Aviv about “tackling” war-crimes in the Gaza Strip. Or the Mafia in Sicily sending “feedback” to Rome about “tackling” crime and corruption in Sicily. Or Count Dracula in Transylvania sending “feedback” to Bucharest about “tackling” vampirism in Transylvania. We can be sure that the IDF, the Mafia, and the Count would all be firmly in favor of “a flexible approach” and “locally led audits,” that is, audits led by themselves and therefore guaranteed to reach the right conclusions. And recall this richly resonant phrase used by Phillips: “more bespoke work.” Again, the IDF, the Mafia and the Count would most certainly want that. After all, who would be “bespeaking” about the best way to “tackle” war-crimes in the Gaza Strip, crime in Sicily, and vampirism in Transylvania? You won’t need any guesses.

Loathsome leftists in Britain: Jess Phillips and Angela Rayner

Yes, that speech by Jess Phillips was a master-class in leftist lying and weasel-words. Watching her make the speech, I was reminded once again of how well a book published in 1949 describes the psychology and behavior of leftists like Phillips in 2025. I’m talking about Orwell’s classic Nineteen Eighty-Four, of course. Jess Phillips is the Minister for Safeguarding Women and Girls. Orwell captures all the truth and sincerity of that title when he describes how, in his darkly comic dystopia, “The Ministry of Peace concerns itself with war, the Ministry of Truth with lies, the Ministry of Love with torture and the Ministry of Plenty with starvation.” But there’s also a classic from 1886 that describes leftists in 2025. I’m reminded of it every time I see Jess Phillips and her Labour colleague Angela Rayner. The classic is Robert Louis Stevenson’s Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. Here’s a highly relevant quote from it:

Mr. Hyde was pale and dwarfish, he gave an impression of deformity without any nameable malformation, he had a displeasing smile, he had borne himself to the lawyer with a sort of murderous mixture of timidity and boldness, and he spoke with a husky, whispering and somewhat broken voice; all these were points against him, but not all of these together could explain the hitherto unknown disgust, loathing, and fear with which Mr. Utterson regarded him. “There must be something else,” said the perplexed gentleman. “There is something more, if I could find a name for it. God bless me, the man seems hardly human! Something troglodytic, shall we say? or can it be the old story of Dr. Fell? or is it the mere radiance of a foul soul that thus transpires through, and transfigures, its clay continent?” (Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, Robert Louis Stevenson, 1886)

Loathsome leftists in America: Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton

Like Chuck Schumer and Hillary Clinton in America, Jess Phillips and Angela Rayner aren’t “pale and dwarvish.” But all four of those leftists strike me as “hardly human” and fill me with “disgust and loathing.” And in each case I attribute that to the “radiance of a foul soul that thus transpires through, and transfigures, its clay continent.” When Jess Phillips made that speech about “Tackling child sexual abuse and exploitation,” I witnessed once again the “radiance” of her “foul soul.” And after she’d made the speech, I witnessed more radiance from the foul soul of another female leftist. But this time it was a leftist I’d never heard of: one Tessa Munt (born 1959), an MP for the Liberal Democrats (this is another Orwellian title: it really means the Illiberal Anti-Democrats). Ms Munt had been enraged by the response of a quick-thinking Conservative to Phillips’ speech. The Shadow Home Secretary Katie Lam pointed out that the Pakistani rape-gangs were clearly motivated by racial hatred of Whites and quoted one of Labour’s ethnic pets to that effect: “We’re here to fuck all the white girls.”

Tessa Munt spits out the phrase “white men” as she addresses her fellow goyim in parliament

Ms Munt wasn’t standing for that incitement to racial hatred. Or rather, she was standing for it. Quivering with indignation, she rose to her feet from the famous green benches of the House of Commons and proclaimed: “My blood is boiling as I listen to this stuff from the Conservative benches.” She then reminded the racist Tories of “people just like me, white girls who’ve suffered at the hands of white men.” The venom with which she spat out the phrase “white men” was a sight (and sound) to behold. Well, as I said, I’d never heard of Tessa Munt before, but a little research told me that I’d just witnessed this “white girl” supply a classic M.F.G. moment. In other words, Ms Munt was addressing “My Fellow Goyim.” Wikipedia, as lovingly “curated” by leftists, says that Munt’s “mother was raised within the Church of Scotland, but her family had mainly Jewish roots.”

Accordingly, Ms Munt reminds me of Denis MacShane, the slug-like leftist and bon viveur who long and devotedly served as Labour MP for Rotherham. Unfortunately, Denis was badly let down by the local police, who failed to notify him that, decade in, decade out, Pakistani Muslims had been brazenly raping, torturing, prostituting, and murdering White working-class girls in what he called his “wonderful constituency.” That is, Denis says he didn’t act because the police failed to notify him, but his credibility was sadly tarnished when he was jailed for fraud in 2013. His downfall was lamented by the Jewish Chronicle, which saluted him as “one of the [Jewish] community’s greatest champions.” The Chronicle was perfectly correct in that description. But MacShane wasn’t elected to champion rich Jews in far-off London. He was elected to champion the White working-class in Rotherham. He didn’t do that. Instead, he utterly betrayed the White working-class, just like his “beloved Labour party” as a whole.

The Judeo-leftist war on Whites and the West

In short, the Labour party doesn’t merely hate the White workers it was found to champion, but imports and incites non-White savages to rape, torture, prostitute, and murder the daughters of White workers. It then condemns anyone who notices its criminal conspiracy as “racist” and “Islamophobic.” Modern Britain is like a giant Carry On movie based on Nineteen Eighty-Four but scripted by the Marquis de Sade and directed by Jeffrey Epstein. It would, of course, be called Carry on Raping. If you don’t know the Carry On movies — Carry On Cruising from 1962, Carry On Camping from 1969, and so on — they’re classics of no-brow British comedy, cheaply made, crammed with crude innuendo, and endlessly repeated on nostalgia channels.

Trigger warning needed! Leftists are deeply concerned not by non-White rape-gangs in 2025, but by sexism in movies from 1969

But nowadays they have to be preceded by solemn “trigger warnings” about their racism, sexism and homophobia. Leftists in modern Britain are determined to tackle the harmful effects of words in decades-old movies, you see. At the same time, leftists are determined not to tackle the rape, torture, prostituting, and murder of White working-class girls by non-White men in towns and cities all over Britain. After all, the non-White men are vital footsoldiers in the Judeo-leftist war on Whites and the West. Jess Phillips, Tessa Munt and Denis MacShane would, of course, all deny that they and their fellow leftists want the non-Whites to carry on raping. But leftist deeds speak far louder than leftist words.

Profiling Palantir — the tech firm beloved by the WEF and founded by Peter Thiel and Zionist zealot, Alex Karp — that is watching every last move you make.

/9 Comments/in /by

 

Good Friends Alex Karp and Volodymyr Zelenskyy

Palantir Technologies — its name derived from the “seeing-stones” of deception (Palantir) that allow their holder to see across great distances to track friends and foes, in JRR Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings — has been called the “most evil company on the planet” by critics (footnote 1) — on both the traditional Left and Right.

Although few people have heard of Palantir, it’s as important as any firm in existence, an existential threat to our personal liberty and global peace, and as dangerous as some of the more infamous firms like Black Rock or Vanguard.

Headquartered in Denver, Palantir was founded by Stanford University dormmates, Peter Thiel and Alex Karp in 2003. Strident Zionist, Karp, brought in Stephen Cohen and others later.

Since then, Palantir has grown into a $200 billion juggernaut with contracts with dozens of governmental bodies globally.

TOO‘s Scott Howard mentioned Palantir a few years ago in passing, when discussing Thiel, writing that Thiel founded Palantir, which was integral to the COVID-19 “vaccine” allocation aspect of Operation Warp Speed (under Trump), among many other aspects of the globalist-transhumanist agendas. And he noted that Thiel shares a similar obsession and ideologies with a “great many of the “elites” behind the Great Reset and the other spokes of the globalist agenda.

Alex Karp, Thiel’s partner, is first and foremost, an anti-White Zionist and Leftist whose contempt for humanity and dissent knows no bounds.

Karp, who cites Israel, the Frankfurt School and his parent’s Judaism as the foundations of his ethos, has described himself as an “activist” and “socialist at heart”. He referred to his parents as Jewish hippies, saying that “they often took him to labour rights demonstrations and anti-Reagan protests when he was young. Even as recently as 2018, during a Wall Street Journal interview, Karp referred to himself as a “proud self-described socialist.” (footnote 2)

Like David Milliband (former British Foreign Secretary to PM Gordon Brown), current British Prime Minister, Kier Starmer — who is married to a Zionist Jew and raising his children as practicing Jews, and has predictably come down as hard on Left wing pro-Palestinian activists as he has on right wing British patriots protesting Islamism — Karp’s self-described penchant for “humanitarian activism” only reaches as far as his tribal allegiance.

In a conversation between Karp and Jacob Helberg — the Zionist economist and writer nominated Under Secretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment by President Donald Trump — Karp discussed the importance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in defending both Ukraine and Israel, saying that AI “must be used to stop Russia and Hamas”.

During the chat, Karp, a self-described strident Leftist, had no problem attacking predominantly left-wing anti-Israel protests at Columbia University, saying “Look at Columbia. There is literally no way to explain the investment in our elite schools, and the output is a pagan religion — a pagan religion of mediocrity and discrimination and intolerance, and violence against Jews.”

My guess is Karp has no problem with leftists that attack Whites and Christians.

Karp is so ardent a Zionist that Palantir held its first board meeting of 2025 in Tel Aviv, where he openly expressed his desire to see US military drone technology used against his political enemies and enemies of Israel and the “West”.

Although he felt doing so might land him in trouble, he felt as Jew he had an obligation to do so. He openly stated that he wished he could use his software and military drones to target his enemies and enemies of Jewry. Although he sometimes intentionally calls his enemies, “enemies of the collective West”, it’s fair to say that he is about as much a Western chauvinist as Noel Igantiev and Meir Kahane — Jews with seemingly diametrically opposing ideologies that assail us and revile us with every last fiber of their beings.

In a CNBC Money Movers interview with NBC’s Alex Kollers, Karp stated that he is unashamed of his political positions, that he is proud to stand with both Ukraine and Israel, and that he does not care if it offends anyone.

And why should he worry what any decent people think?

His positions are the official policy of the U.S. Deep State and collective West and have made Karp a billionaire almost 10 times over.

NBC’s Alex Koller wrote:

Palantir, known for its government contract work in defense and intelligence, has provided its technology to support the Ukrainian and Israeli militaries in their respective wars. Israel has vowed to defeat Hamas following the Palestinian militant group’s rampage on Oct. 7 in Southern Israel that killed nearly 1,200 people.

Palantir held its first board meeting of the year in Tel Aviv, Israel, in January, after which the company agreed to a “strategic partnership” with the Israeli Ministry of Defense to supply the country with technology for its military efforts. In November, Karp asserted the company’s support of the U.S. government and Israel, declaring on an earnings call that “Palantir only supplies its products to Western allies.”

In Wednesday’s interview, Karp reaffirmed his extremist pro-Israel views. Eisen referenced the company’s decision in October to take out a full-page ad in The New York Times, stating it “stands with Israel.”

“From my perspective, it’s not just about Israel,” Karp, who started the firm with Conservative Peter Thiel, told CNBC. “It’s like, ‘Do you believe in the West? Do you believe the West has created a superior way of living?’” (footnote 3)

The “West”?

The West, which for all intents and purposes is modern Christendom and the home of the indigenous Europeans — in spite of what our treasonous leaders tell us — and Israel — the modern illegally occupied squat of the Jewish people — should never be equated.

Karp’s allegiance has nothing to do with the West. Palantir is a tool used by a Zionist zealot and self-described socialist, masquerading as a Western chauvinist, to target his enemies and the enemies of his tribe.

And as deep as Thiel’s involvement in Palantir is, Palantir at this point is this dangerously demented Jewish man’s baby.

Alex Karp (right), Israeli president Isaac Herzog (middle), Peter Thiel (left) at a meeting in Tel Aviv

Palantir’s website describes Palantir Technologies Inc. as an “American publicly traded company that specializes in software platforms and Artificial Intelligence for big data analytics.”

Wikipedia:

The company has four main projects: Palantir Gotham, Palantir Foundry, Palantir Apollo, and Palantir AIP. Palantir Gotham is an intelligence and defence tool used by militaries and counter-terrorism analysts. Its customers included the United States Intelligence Community (USIC) and United States Department of Defense. Their software as a service (SaaS) is one of five offerings authorized for Mission Critical National Security Systems by the U.S. Department of Defense. Palantir Foundry is used for data integration and analysis by corporate clients such as Morgan Stanley, Merck KGaA, Airbus, Wejo, Lilium, PG&E and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles.

So, why I do feel that it is absolutely necessary to talk about Palantir today?

The American firm initially rekindled my attention a few years back during the latter stages of the Trump Administration, after it had won a $91-million U.S. military contract to oversee the development of an artificial intelligence and machine learning mechanism for the US Army Research Laboratory.

In October of 2020 Artificial Intelligence News announced that:

Defense start-up Palantir Technologies will develop artificial intelligence and machine learning capabilities for the US Army Research Laboratory, in a contract worth $91 million over two years. The deal will include the company’s Foundry and Gotham products, to “accelerate and enhance” the Army’s research work.” (footnote 4)

Again, keep in mind, that this was during the last quarter of the first Trump administration, when most of us believed President Trump had moved away from supporting the security state. Palantir is exponentially more dangerous than USAID’s funding of transgender “affirming care” in mice.

It piqued my attention, and troubled me, as I was aware that Karp had been highly critical of Trump and openly supported Democrats like Hilary Clinton.

But it shouldn’t have surprised me because Palantir, like other big companies, has high-level friends in both parties.

Current US Vice President, JD Vance — as much as I do like him — is in fact very close to both Peter Thiel and Alex Karp. Sadly, as smart as the man is, I honestly believe that he thinks that the universally accepted oxymoron, “Judeo-Christian values”, is an actual thing.

The firm had already made a killing — literally (I’ll explain later) — by “working with” the CIA and were now taking their services to the military as well as deeper into the private sector, first going public on the NYSE, and later signing lucrative deals with JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, dozens of US Police departments and a wide variety of Big Pharma companies, in addition to the array of NGOs and agencies attached to the US Federal government it was already working with.

Ironically, under President Biden, although Palantir appeared to have kept its contracts, it wasn’t as front and center as it is with Peter Thiel’s friends — Donald Trump and JD Vance in the White House. While I am a supporter of President Trump on many issues, his support of Israel, seemingly unwavering support for Jewish causes — many of which are pro-war anti-White and anti-Christian — and his current insane position on Iran should be cause for great concern for our people.

And make no mistake, … Karp is as dangerous as it gets.

Palantir sparked my attention again this past January, while watching YouTube vlogs covering The World Economic Forum’s annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, I noticed what looked to be a Palantir office set up adjacent to one of the pavilions hosting the forum. I did a little digging and it appears that Palantir actually has a massive lavish office in the town.

Making it stand out farther was the timing. This was mere days before Donald Trump’s inauguration. A firm trying to lie low, in fear of perhaps losing funding from the incoming U.S. federal government under a new administration promising to cut bloat, wouldn’t be as bold.

Although founder, Alex Karp — who admittedly voted for Hillary Clinton and was recorded during a Palantir company meeting saying that he turned down an invitation from President Trump for dinner, proclaiming “I respect nothing about the dude” — he continues to work hand-in-hand with the likes of Marco Rubio and the openly pro-Zionist Trump administration.

It is my opinion, as unpopular as it may be with supporters of Mr. Trump, that Trump’s reliance on men like Mike Waltz, Jacob Helberg, Marco Rubio, Stephen Miller and even Pete Hesgeth — with his misguided obsession with Islam and support of our true adversary — is a deterrent to genuine global peace and White and gentile rights worldwide.

Due to how close the Trump Administration is to Israel, I fear that Palantir will have an even greater impact on global affairs during Trump’s second term than it did in his first or even Biden’s.

As recently as last week, while watching old YouTube videos from Davos discussing the WEF’s role in the liberal “elite’s” push for what is referred to as “global transgenderism”, I saw another Palantir sign in the city.

The LGBT and transgender activists, surrounded by Davos security, were standing directly in front of yet another Palantir sign, in a shot that made me sit up and immediately shake my head with concern. I asked myself why a firm that handles information technology, Artificial Intelligence and surveillance — a firm that largely works “behind the scenes” — needs such a PUBLIC display in Davos?

And why was Karp literally seemingly everywhere that week and since?

He has been on CNBC multiple times, the focus of several interviews regarding Israel and protests against the Apartheid State on U.S. College campuses, antisemitism, the “importance” of Ukraine, as well as interviewed by Bloomberg and a multitude of other mainstream media channels since the run up to Trump’s inauguration — as if he is taking a larger role in our lives and he wants us to know it.

Just how much of a threat to our freedom is Palantir?

To understand the role Palantir plays I think it is important to understand its role in both the public and private sectors and most importantly, what it does.

Firstly, make no mistake, Palantir and its ardently pro-Zionist founder is the go-to firm our governments use to spy on us. In the United States, police departments from southern California to Boston use Palantir to track all sorts of people. Left wing activists in San Leandro California like Michael Katz-Lacabe, a California-based privacy rights activist and the founder of the Center for Human Rights and Privacy, has written for almost a decade about the dangers of Palantir domestically.

In 2010 Katz-Lacabe, a native of Oakland, California, learned that his San Leandro Police Department’s automatic license plate readers — designed to photograph and track the movements of every car in the city, every minute of every day — had been tracking him.

He filed a public records and freedom of information request for any videos and images that included either of his two cars. The police shockingly sent back 112 photos. Lacabe found several that had his children and their faces in the video.

Although I personally don’t have an issue with this, and Leftists like Katz-Lacabe are looking to profiteer from litigation against firms like Oracle and Palantir as well as against police departments who use such data when tracking actual violent criminals, he did make several valid points when discussing Palantir’s technology in an op-ed for his website, Oakland Privacy.

Who knows how many other people’s kids are captured in these images? With this technology you can wind back the clock and see where everyone is, if they were parked at the house of someone other than their wife, a medical marijuana clinic, a Planned Parenthood center, a protest.

From the FOI request Katz-Lacabe found that the millions of pictures collected by San Leandro’s license plate cameras are now passed on to the Northern California Regional Intelligence Center (NCRIC), one of 72 federally-run intelligence fusion organizations set up after 9/11. These photos are analysed using software built by San Francisco based Palantir.

Katz-Lacabe wrote:

In the business proposal that Palantir sent NCRIC, it offered customer references that included the Los Angeles and New York police departments, boasting that it enabled searches of the NYPD’s 500 million plate photos in less than five seconds. Katz-Lacabe contacted Palantir about his privacy concerns, and the company responded by inviting him to its headquarters for a sit-down meeting. When he arrived at the Shire, a pair of employees gave him an hour-long presentation on Palantir’s vaunted safeguards: its access controls, immutable logs and the internal Batphone.

Karp has said that he wants his technology to be used for “good”. But does he have the same moral compass as we do?

Although Katz-Lacabe focused on his fears that Palantir software and surveillance technology would be used to spy on people who work for left-wing organisations like Planned Parenthood (as if….) that I am quite sure are fully supported by Karp, he failed to mention the sort of people it actually targets.

And Palantir is not just active in the United States.

There’s a great deal of consternation in the UK over the use of CCTV and speed cameras. Though these technologies have tracked down murderers like Wayne Couzens, the monstrous cop who kidnapped, raped and killed Sarah Everard, it’s fair to say that the government primarily use these to make money from people going 32 in a 30 mph zone, and have installed Palantir’s tech to track, monitor and watch their enemies first and foremost.

We have seen Kier Starmer in Britain for all intents and purposes designate the right-leaning British White patriot as the island nation’s greatest threat and pathogen. A close second are people that oppose Israel, typically White liberals and their non-White plantation pets on the Left.

Who’s to say that the British government won’t use the sort of technology Starmer is pursuing at Palantir to track his enemies so that he can wage lawfare against them “pre-emptively”?

Over the past year Palantir has also been working directly with the Israeli military on their campaign of so-called “targeted killings”. Palantir has been using social media information from Meta and other firms, as well as mobile phone data to track people, so that the IDF can target them for assassination.

Watchdogs estimate these murders have resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of people.

A prominent left-leaning anti-Zionist Substack publication, the Political Economist, claimed that “over 150 Palestinian journalists have been killed in Gaza and in numerous cases they appear to have been directly targeted [using Palantir tech].” writing that “Using social media information to murder journalists using drone strikes is already dystopic, but this is likely to just be the beginning of the evil Palantir will facilitate.”

And it’s not solely Karp’s support of Israel that has shaped company policy, nor is it a recent phenomenon.

As far back as 2011, e-mails demonstrated that a Palantir engineer had collaborated on a proposal to silence what they termed a “WikiLeaks threat” to spill documents they had on the Bank of America were leaked to the press.

Wikileaks were not specifically a threat to Israel. In fact, I think it is fair to say that Wikileaks set their sights on the U.S. Deep State and Democrat Party in particular.

The Palantir staffer, with no evidence that they conspired with the firm’s Zionist founder, had eagerly agreed to use company software to both track and identify members of the Wikileaks team, as well as its donors — track their physical and web-based movements. Several other Palantir staff also supported the idea of using the software’s power to launch cyberattacks on WikiLeaks’ infrastructure and even threaten its donors, supporters, and “sympathizers”.

When the scandal demonstrating that Palantir was already being used to harm actual truth tellers broke, Karp reacted by placing the team member on leave. He immediately issued a statement profusely apologizing for his staffer’s “indiscretion” and pledged to adhere to the company’s support for “progressive values and causes.”

And here I thought Wikileaks work exposing government surveillance and war crimes, was progressive in nature.

To Karp and his ilk, the term ‘progressive’ obviously has a very different connotation than it does to genuine liberals who typically oppose Israel and the surveillance state, as well as even the far-left loons and grifters of the left wing — women like AOC — of the Democratic Party. To men like Karp though, the term appears to refer to work that protects the agendas of the Neo-Liberal establishment and global elite, and of course — and certainly most importantly — Israel. Although Karp vowed changes would be made, due to concerns his engineers were working with the state to stifle free speech and target dissent (Wikileaks) within months of the scandal, the offending engineer was rehired, and nothing of consequence happened.

It was as if Palantir’s tech was being weaponised by the surveillance state to protect the Deep State. Who could have seen that coming!

Just as Meta intentionally censored the “Hunter Biden laptop story” and Jack Dorsey’s Twitter literally banned the sitting President of the United States so that he couldn’t broadcast his views during his campaign for president, Palantir was doing the bidding of the Deep State, the Neo-Liberal elite and Democrat Party.

Who could have seen that coming??!!

The technology used in 2011 and this past year in Israel to target Palestinian journalists, is now being widely used across the United States and by regimes around the world.

Unsurprisingly, Palantir’s technology has widespread support from both sides of the aisle in the United States and Britain, and is sought after by any government that can afford it.

Palantir, whose past advisors include Condoleezza Rice and former CIA director George Tenet, also continues to create surveillance technology for NSA, the FBI, the CIA, IDF, MI5 among other firms and government agencies at home and abroad, in both the public and private sectors.

So far, it has remained in the hands of massive wealthy governments like the United States and even China as it isn’t cheap. However, it is already being used by smaller vassal States like Ukraine (with U.S. funding) — in its proxy war against Russia — as well as by the likes of Israel.

In fact, Palantir — even in its earliest days — was closely linked to both the CIA and more importantly, the Jewish state of Israel. Some say it was in fact directly funded by both during its start-up phase.

It is also at the forefront of the military artificial intelligence sector. …

As predicted in the Tom Cruise sci-film, Minority Report, Palantir has created programs that literally locate, monitor, track and perhaps even groom and entrap people before they perpetrate crimes. The software application is used by the State to watch their targets until the moment they are incinerated by one of our drones or taken out by an operative.

Some of the people targeted are, no doubt, well-deserving of being turned into dust, but in other cases, Palantir targets dissidents, people working on behalf of genuine causes and enemies of the State.

And it shouldn’t really come as a surprise, as Karp has never shied away from his interest in targeting people just like you and me, student groups protesting Israel, and dissenters he feels are a threat to the sort of society he wants to live in.

Over the past decade, Palantir has become the go-to company for what the intel industry refers to as “mining,” collating and analysing data and digital information for American and Israeli intelligence and law enforcement agencies. It has even been used by Beijing when tracking their own people. The same hypocritical western politicians bloviating about democracy and human rights — the ones who that tell us that the naughty Chinese are our enemy because they are bad to their own citizens and others like the Uyghurs— have absolutely no problem whatsoever funding a firm that enables the Communist Chinese government to spy on and kill its own people. Not to mention innocent Palestinian civilians trapped in an open-air prison in Gaza.

And from what I have ascertained, access to Palantir’s surveillance and AI software is far more useful than any state-sanctioned security clearance. Why would you need access to days and weeks old pre-collated intelligence that is sometimes weeks and months old, when you can track specific enemies in real-time?

Even if someone has had his security clearances taken away — as Trump has supposedly done to Biden, Clinton and Obama — anyone with credentials to access Palantir’s data and machinery has all that they need to track their enemies and dispose of them.

Does anyone for a moment think that Hilary Clinton needs U.S. security clearance to target her enemies?

Palantir’s software indubitably enables swamp creatures like Condy Rice and John Brennan unlimited access to the firm’s software interface linked to satellites, global CCTV networks, and to Palantir’s team of de-coders — to literally watch anyone they want, even while they are no longer in power.

Though I have seen no specific intel to support this, I am certain that their friends like Dick and Liz Cheney also have access to this information. Palantir — using AI and both federal and private social media databases — also compiles data, targets movement patterns and converts disconnected piles of information into maps, histograms, live-action updates and charts that give its users the ability to monitor, predict the movement of and “tail” whomever they want. It is also believed that it can shut down your computerised car while you are driving it, cancel your Visa, Mastercard and bank cards, and empty your bank account anywhere in the Western world. Yet another reason to hold onto a bit of cash and emergency necessities.

Unless you are living underground outside Tyumen in the Siberian Tundra, be confident that the people in charge of all our lives can see you, your domicile, front and rear door, know where your kids sleep and track your movements. I am not saying that they are actively watching every one of us, just that they can if we become too much of a nuisance.

Remember during Trump’s first term, during negotiations with the Taliban, he even threatened Afghan leaders with this. Trump specifically made mention of the software that knows where their kids sleep. Bill Maher, the wretched Liberal who gets far too much airtime with right-wing pundits, recently said he found himself respecting Trump because of this specific incident.

This is the power of Palantir.

Whether it’s monitoring “terrorists” in the Hindu Kush, evaluating disaster response in South Carolina, watching human trafficking happening in Tijuana in real-time or monitoring dissidents at Columbia University — Palantir’s software is linked to incredibly powerful surveillance satellites as well as CCTV around the globe. It’s like in the four “Bourne” movies where the American CIA types in Washington monitor the movements of Jason Bourne running around the streets of Europe, using local German CCTV.

It has that much reach.

According to information I have compiled from Palantir and other sources — among those using Palantir’s systems are:

  • The US Marines who have deployed its tools in Afghanistan for forensic analysis of roadside bombs and predicting insurgent attacks;
  • ICE agents watching cartels and coyotes along the Rio Grande;
  • It is also used to monitor customer workings in high finance. According to a former JPMorgan Chase big-shot, the firm, which acquired access to Palantir technology, saved hundreds of millions of dollars by using the software to tackle issues from cyber-fraud to bad (i.e., overextended and fraudulent) mortgages.

A Palantir user at, let’s say, Citibank can, in a matter of moments, see connections between a Nigerian Internet service provider and protocol address, a proxy server hidden somewhere within the U.S., and a million-dollar payment leaving from a hijacked home equity line of credit or loan.

Sounds good, but have you noticed how it is only accessible to the people in charge and to protect their interests?

Palantir, known in security circles as the “killer app,” can also take much of the credit for the location and ultimately the killing of Osama bin Laden (or whoever it was).

These are, no doubt, perhaps some of its more positive applications.

Now to a few more negatives:

  • January 6 protesters were tracked before and after they left the Capitol using the software. They were identified and their travels tracked as well.
  • Under the Obama administration, Palantir was used extensively to spy on the administration’s political enemies, including Donald Trump, Dinesh DeSouza and scores, perhaps hundreds of others.
  • The same software and interface that says it can predict ambushes in an Iraqi far-off desert before they occur, is now being used by pharmaceutical firms to compile and analyse drug data, outcomes of using the drugs, and providing recommendations prior to lawsuits being filed.

I haven’t seen evidence to support the following assertion: perhaps Palantir tech was involved with taking out the Assad government in Syria, as it was in the killing of thousands of dissidents in Palestine as mentioned above. That coup has resulted in the murder of thousands of Syrian Christians and Alawites. I’m sure no Israelis have been harmed.

It is rumoured in Russian circles that Dasha Dugina and her father, Alexander, were targeted for assassination using intel and Palantir software made available to the Ukrainians.

This was, regardless of your stance on the conflict, an illegal act of terror perpetrated against a civilian writer and journalist. Dugina, whose only crime was being the daughter of a widely read academic and pundit who supported his country, was undoubtedly the target. They’d have seen Ms Dugina before she entered the car. I believe they targeted her to punish him.

Though there is no evidence that Palantir software was used in the hit, but it would be naïve to think that Palantir tech was not used in many of Ukraine’s attacks against civilian targets and infrastructure in Russia.

The reason Trump specifically mentioned taking out the Taliban’s kids when threatening them, and Ms Dugina was killed instead of her father — the supposed target — is simple: This is how you impact perceived “strongmen” in non-Western nations and cultures. You harm their blood relatives.

This is why the Israelis target the family members of Palestinian dissidents as much as they target the actual dissident.

And it is not just overseas.

Libertarians and civil rights activists on both the right and genuine left rightfully worry the software is now being used domestically — to keep the rich and powerful on top, and take out enemies of the Deep State, the Party in power, and to punish effective and legal dissent.

“They’re in a scary business,” Electronic Frontier Foundation attorney Lee Tien told people at a recent conference he gave on the surveillance state. “Palantir is a true totalitarian nightmare that monitors the comings and goings as well as the daily activities of innocent Americans on a mass scale.”

My final thought on the matter:

As powerful as Palantir is, it seems to have been pretty shoddy at spotting hundreds of Palestinian fighters entering Israel, by car, foot, and paraglider on October 7. For technology that can supposedly track an Afghan child playing in a cave nestled twenty thousand feet above sea level in the Baba Mountain Range, it sure seems to have pretty spotty coverage along the fortified wall separating Gaza and Israel. Very odd.

Additional notes:

Although Karp has no regard for our privacy, he appears to value his. His office — decorated with cardboard effigies of himself built adoringly (perhaps so he won’t ask the Feds to strike their homes 🙂 by Palantir staff and a symbolic Lego fortress on a coffee table — overlooks Palo Alto’s Alma Street through two-way mirrors, that are said to be bullet proof.

No one can look into his office or the building and if you dare to try and take a photo of the place, you will get arrested. There are tales across the net of the lengths this man will go to protect his anonymity and privacy. Being responsible for the deaths of thousands of fighters globally will put a target on your back.

Each pane of his mirrored fortress is also fitted with an electronic device resembling a space-aged white hockey puck. These gadgets, known as acoustic transducers, imperceptibly send a vibratory signal to the glass that creates a veritable force field of white noise. (These are similar to the sort of thing we would see in cartoons we grew up with.) This mechanism prevents modern laser-driven eavesdropping techniques — laser technology his team and rival firms have also produced — that are able to record conversation.

The term “regime” shouldn’t only be used for leaders we are told not to like, like Vladimir Putin, Robert Fico, the Saudi leadership, Kim Jong Un, Basha Al-Assad or Saddam Hussein. Last time I checked, none of these men have sought to harm me, my kith and kin or anyone I care about in any way. The regimes across the West have.

Footnotes

  1. The Political Economist, Substack — The World’s Most Evil Company, https://politicaleconomist.substack.com/p/palantir-the-worlds-most-evil-company, Feb 6, 2025
  2. Avery Hartmans, Business Insider — The career rise of billionaire Alex Karp, Palantir’s outspoken CEO, https://www.businessinsider.com/alex-karp-bio-palantir-ceo, Dec 17, 2024
  3. Alex Koller, CNBC — Palantir CEO says his outspoken pro-Israel views have caused employees to leave company https://www.cnbc.com/2024/03/13/palantir-ceo-says-outspoken-pro-israel-views-led-employees-to-leave-.html,Mar 13, 2024
  4. Chuck Martin, AI Business News — Palantir wins US Army AI contract worth $91 million, https://aibusiness.com/nlp/palantir-wins-us-army-ai-contract-worth-91-million, Oct 8, 2020

Guatemala’s Strange Love Affair with Israel

/3 Comments/in /by

Strange things are happening in Guatemala.

In February 2025, Guatemalan authorities arrested Yoel Alter, a senior leader of the Ultra-Orthodox Jewish cult Lev Tahor, outside a government childcare facility in Guatemala City.

Alter is wanted in Guatemala and Mexico in connection to human trafficking allegations. He had recently been organizing protests as a direct response to the Guatemala government’s crackdown in November that separated 148 children from their parents within the sect’s compound near Oratorio, Guatemala. The protests sought to challenge the Guatemalan government’s custody of minors rescued during raids that uncovered systemic abuse, including forced marriages, child rape, and malnutrition.

Lev Tahor “Pure Heart” was founded in 1988 in Jerusalem by Rabbi Shlomo Helbrans. The group adheres to an extreme interpretation of Judaism, enforcing strict dietary laws, extended prayer sessions, and requiring women and girls to wear full-body coverings.

The Jewish cult relocated to Guatemala around 2013 after fleeing investigations in other countries, such as Canada and the United States, for a series of sex-related crimes. They established a compound near Oratorio, close to the border with El Salvador. The move was part of their pattern of seeking refuge in countries with less stringent oversight on matters concerning human trafficking.

The broader Jewish communities in these Latin American countries tactically distanced themselves from Lev Tahor and supported recent investigations into the sect, likely as a way to divert attention away from organized Jewry’s long-standing connections to human trafficking.

What could have possibly made Guatemala a spot for the most depraved elements of Jewish society to carry out their heinous crimes? A closer look at its recent history reveals the rise of a sizable evangelical movement—one that has made Guatemala Latin America’s most staunchly pro-Zionist state.

This growth of evangelicalism in Guatemala has been over a century in the making. In 1882, Justo Barrios, a liberal president with anti-Catholic views, invited an American Presbyterian minister to Guatemala to encourage the growth of Protestantism. Later, in the late 1890s and early 1900s, Protestant missionaries from organizations like the Central American Mission, Quakers, Primitive Methodists, and Nazarenes began arriving. Pentecostal missionaries associated with the United and Free Gospel Society joined them in 1916.

Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein, founder of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews (IFCJ), perceptively remarked in an interview Christianity Today in 2017 that wherever Pentecostal traditions have spread across the globe, so has Christian Zionism. Research has confirmed Eckstein’s observation, which has found a correlation between the growth of these traditions and support for Israel. “Just as Pentecostals and Charismatics experienced remarkable success spreading their movement around the globe, exuberant expressions of Christian Zionism proliferated alongside these preexisting Pentecostal networks as well,” wrote Joseph Williams, a religious scholar at Rutgers University. This trend toward evangelical confessions held true in Guatemala throughout the 20th century.

After World War II, the Central American nation played a crucial role in the establishment of Israel’s statehood, being one of the first countries to vote in favor of UN Resolution 181 in 1947. This resolution called for the partition of Palestine and the creation of a Jewish state. In 1948, Guatemala became one of 21 countries in the United Nations to recognize the state of Israel.

Guatemala’s support for Israel’s creation in 1948 laid the foundation for deep military collaboration between the two nations. As one of the first nations to recognize Israel, Guatemala positioned itself as a key ally during the Cold War, particularly as Guatemala faced international isolation for its role in suppressing indigenous guerillas during a brutal civil war from 1960 to 1996 —  a conflict that claimed over 200,000 lives.

Under Guatemalan President Carlos Arana Osorio (1970–1974), Israel began supplying arms and counterinsurgency expertise, which intensified after the United States restricted military aid to Guatemala in 1977 over human rights abuses. Israeli advisers gradually introduced tactics modeled on Israel’s own occupation strategies in Palestine. Among these were scorched-earth operations that Guatemalan forces emulated in their campaigns to destroy more than 600 villages.

Israeli influence also extended to military infrastructure, with Guatemalan troops adopting Israeli-designed field camps, communication systems, and weaponry such as Galil assault rifles and Uzi submachine guns. Additionally, Israel’s Nahal program — fusing military training with agricultural settlement — served as a blueprint for Guatemala’s “Beans and Bullets” strategy, aimed at pacifying rural populations through the provision of basic services such as health care, education, and other benefits to Indigenous communities who cooperated with the government, while meting out harsh punishments against communities suspected of supporting guerrillas.

The Israeli-Guatemalan collaboration continued swimmingly under the regime of General Efraín Ríos Montt, who ruled from 1982 to 1983. In addition to being backed by the United States, his government received crucial military support from Israel, including Arava transport planes and armored vehicles, fueling one of the bloodiest chapters in Guatemala’s history.

While Israel helped Guatemala wage a brutal civil war, many Guatemalans sought solace in religion. Evangelical churches provided a sense of community and hope amidst widespread suffering. The Guatemalan earthquake of 1976, which killed over 22,000 people. was another key moment in the spread of evangelicalism in Guatemala. It devastated many communities, and evangelical organizations, particularly from the United States, saw this as an opportunity to provide extensive humanitarian aid and grow their influence. These groups filled gaps left by the government, offering food, shelter, and emotional support. Their efforts gained them significant numbers of converts as they presented both material and spiritual solutions during a time of crisis.

In this process, General Ríos Montt would become Guatemala’s first evangelical Christian president during his brief time in office. His government promoted evangelicalism as part of its agenda, allying with the U.S.-based evangelical groups and figures such as Pat Robertson. Ríos Montt’s government actively supported evangelical churches while marginalizing Catholicism by accusing it of being linked to liberation theology and leftist movements during the Central American country’s civil war. This political backing helped solidify evangelical influence in the country.

Though Ríos Montt’s tenure was brief, evangelicalism endured as a potent force in Guatemalan politics, with later presidents like Jorge Serrano Elías (1990–1993) and Jimmy Morales (2016-2020) openly embracing the faith as a defining feature of their public identities. The latter, who is an evangelical entertainer with a Baptist seminary degree, was particularly zealous about his pro-evangelical credentials and his devotion to the Jewish state.

As Guatemala’s third evangelical president, Morales prioritized Israel since his election in 2015. His first official visit outside of the Americas was Israel itself. “Guatemala has a special relationship with Israel, and we know we can continue to work together in partnership and hand in hand,” Morales said to then-Israeli President Reuven Rivlin in Jerusalem during a diplomatic visit he made to Israel in 2016.

In 2018, the United States broke a major diplomatic taboo by moving its embassy in Tel Aviv to Jerusalem — a move that unraveled seven decades of global consensus, Jerusalem’s status as a contested capital traces back to the aforementioned UN Resolution 181, which designated the city as a corpus separatum under international administration. The plan was rejected by Arab states, leading to the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and the division of Jerusalem into Israeli-controlled West Jerusalem and Jordanian-held East Jerusalem.

Israel’s capture of East Jerusalem during the 1967 Six-Day War further complicated the city’s status, with Israel asserting sovereignty over the entire municipality—a claim unrecognized by the United Nations and most nations. The international community, including the United States until 2018, maintained embassies in Tel Aviv to avoid influencing the outcome of final-status negotiations.

However, when Donald Trump took the White House in 2016, Israel’s political fortunes took a fortuitous turn. As a public figure with deep connections to organized Jewry that span multiple decades, Trump could be counted on to carry out Israel’s bidding. Moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem was one of Trump’s most notable pro-Israeli gestures.

As both a vassal state of the United States and a loyal friend of Israel, Guatemala would shortly follow Uncle Sam in moving its embassy to Jerusalem. Morales described the move as a continuation of Guatemala’s pro-Zionist legacy, stressing “love, peace, and fraternity” with Israel.

In Guatemala, Israel has a reliable toady. The Guatemalan parliament regularly celebrates Israel’s anniversaries and has established a Guatemala-Israel Parliamentary Friendship League with over 80 deputies. Guatemala and Israel also bolstered trade ties by signing a free trade agreement in March 2024.

As the United States renews its focus on Latin America, its diplomatic posture is increasingly likely to hinge on each country’s stance toward Israel — effectively sorting allies and adversaries along that axis. Being a polity run by and for the benefit of Jews creates such a strange dynamic. For its warm relationship with Israel, Guatemala appears to have received a get-out-of-jail-free card.

It’s an open secret that Mexico has the largest population of illegal aliens in the United States at roughly 5 million per DHS figures — a conservative estimate if we’re being honest. In second place, Guatemala has 750,000 illegal aliens living in the United States. Additionally, there are close to 2 million Hispanics of Guatemalan origin living in the United States.

Like most diasporas from the Global South, Guatemala is largely dependent on remittances. Remittances to Guatemala reached a record $21.5 billion in 2024 — constituting nearly 20 percent of the country’s GDP.

Despite having such a large number of migrants sullying the United States’ venerable soil, Guatemala receives mild criticism from the United States. Contrast that to Colombia, whose president Gustavo Petro has offended the DC foreign policy consensus by criticizing Israel’s genocide in Gaza and cozying up to China. Indeed, Colombia has a sizable illegal alien population of 240,000, but it still trails considerably behind Guatemala’s.

Regardless, at the start of the second Trump administration, Colombia received massive tariff threats and a nasty tongue lashing from the Trump administration. Michael Oren, the former United States ambassador to Israel, praised Trump for his tariff threats against Colombia, saying, “I applaud President Trump’s resolve in confronting Colombia’s openly anti-American government. Let this be a message to the world’s terror-supporting regimes: America is back.”

Remarkably, Oren previously praised Guatemala for its recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital on December 24, 2017. He exclaimed, “Viva Guatemala! It takes courage for a superpower to stand up for justice and recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s eternal capital. But it takes even more —immense guts—for a small nation to do that. People of Guatemala, the people of Israel will never forget your support and bravery.”

One thing is clear: A credible anti-Zionist threat is not coming out of Guatemala anytime soon.

As of 2023, evangelical Christians comprise an estimated 44.2 to 45.6 percent of Guatemala’s population, making evangelicalism the country’s largest religious affiliation—surpassing Catholicism, which now accounts for approximately 42.4 percent. This marks a profound transformation in the nation’s religious landscape, driven in part by vigorous proselytizing and the movement’s resonance during periods of political upheaval and natural disaster. In turn, it has helped establish a lasting pro-Zionist sentiment within the Guatemalan populace.

In the wake of Oct. 7, 2023 attacks, the Jewish state has had to walk a delicate public relations tight rope. The Israel Defense Force’s punitive campaign against the population of Gaza, often resembling an industrial scale child ritual murder act that would make an extremist Hasidic cult blush, has horrified large swatches of the globe.

While Israel enjoys the special privilege of being supported by the world’s pre-imminent superpower in the United States, no country’s super power status is permanent. It is for that reason, as I’ve detailed previously, Israel has courted nations such as India as part of a plan to have backup options in a world where the United States can no longer be counted to be the unipolar power.

In such a multipolar environment, the Jewish state will be looking to recruit all manner of allies big and small. Guatemala, as backwards and geopolitically irrelevant as it may be, will be one of the few nations who will back Israel unconditionally, no matter what skullduggery Israel is involved in.

However, with Javier Milei as President of Argentina, Guatemala could have stiff competition in being Israel’s most loyal house slave in the Spanish-speaking world.

Not exactly something to be proud of.

The Boundless Power of Black Privilege: It Rescues Rapists, Elevates Incompetents and Is Building the Blacklash

/3 Comments/in /by

Here’s a fascinating new concept: the one-off rape. It’s a rape committed in a moment of aberration by a special kind of man who is otherwise entirely respectable and worthy. Obviously, then, the man doesn’t need to be seriously punished or censured for the rape, because he has never raped before and he’s never going to rape again. And how do we know that? Well, because it’s a one-off rape. One-off, see?

Trained in Nigeria

Now, you’ll no doubt be wondering what kind of man gets to commit a one-off rape. Not a man like me, that’s for sure. And not men like the vast majority of those who read the Occidental Observer and Unz Review. I’m not special and they’re not special. If I or one of them ever commit a single rape, it will merit harsh punishment and life-long labelling as “rapist.” No, the special kind of man who gets to commit a one-off rape is described here:

Doctor not struck off by panel over ‘one-off’ rape

A doctor found by a tribunal to have raped a young woman at his home avoided being struck off over what the panel described as a “one-off” attack. Dr Aloaye Foy-Yamah, then a consultant at Blackpool Victoria Hospital, instead had his medical licence suspended for 12 months for attacking the woman.

Police investigated but did not charge Dr Foy-Yamah, but the Medical Tribunal Practitioners Service (MPTS) concluded on the balance of probabilities that he had raped the woman — which he denies. The panel, which emphasised the incident had not taken place at work, has been accused of “victim-blaming” and failing to properly assess Dr Foy-Yamah’s risk given that it found he had raped someone. […] The General Medical Council (GMC), which regulates the register of doctors licensed to practice in the UK, had asked an independent panel run by the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) to permanently erase Dr Foy-Yamah’s licence.

However the panel stopped short, stating that Dr Foy-Yamah had not “abused his position of trust as a doctor” because the victim was not a patient, and noted a series of glowing testimonials from colleagues. The legally qualified chair of the panel, Angus Macpherson, wrote: “The Tribunal considered that this was a one-off event in Dr Foy-Yamah’s personal life. It did not involve patient safety concerns. The Tribunal has found it will not be repeated.” (“Doctor not struck off by panel over ‘one-off’ rape,” BBC News, 29th March 2025)

You need to know only one thing to understand why the tribunal was so lenient with Dr Aloaye Foy-Yamah, despite finding that he had in fact committed rape. The tribunal was lenient because Dr Foy-Yamah is Black. The BBC doesn’t reveal that he “trained at the University of Benin in Nigeria in 1995 before moving to the UK.” This move means that he now benefits from Black privilege, the systemic bias in favor of Blacks that exists across the West.

Black privilege is a sub-set of non-White privilege, which has protected rapists in a much worse way for a much longer time in towns like Rotherham. Pakistani Muslim rape-gangs have been preying on White girls there for decades with the complicity — and sometimes active assistance — of the so-called Labour party, which was founded to champion the White working-class but now works tirelessly to harm the White working-class. However, here’s a curious fact about Labour. Although it loudly professes to be an anti-racist and anti-sexist party, its leaders have always, without exception, been stale pale males, from Keir Hardie in 1906 to Keir Starmer in 2025.

Gloriously non-White leaders

But Labour’s supposed political rivals, the Conservative party, have had four female leaders and two gloriously non-White leaders. But that isn’t six un-pale-stale-male leaders in total, because the current leader is both Black and female. She’s the Nigerian Kemi Badenoch and succeeded the Indian Rishi Sunak. When Sunak became prime minister in 2022, some leftists and cuckservatives celebrated the fact that four regions of the British Isles had had non-White leaders in the twenty-first century. There was the Indian Rishi Sunak in England, the Pakistani Humza Yousuf in Scotland, the Indian Leo Varadkar in Ireland, and the Black Vaughan Gething in Wales.

Duds, not dynamos: the non-White leaders celebrated by leftists and cuckservatives

What a wonderful time for the British Isles! That’s what some leftists and cuckservatives said. But they’ve now gone quiet about the Fantastic Four, because all of those non-White leaders have proved to be duds, not dynamos. Most glaringly of all, Sunak steered the Conservative party to its worst ever election defeat in 2024. Now the Tories are trying again with another non-White, Kemi Badenoch, who was widely hailed as a Black reincarnation of Margaret Thatcher, as an anti-woke dynamo who would ram home the devastating message that Labour are the real racists. But alas for the Tories, Badenoch is also proving to be a dud, not a dynamo. It’s becoming increasingly apparent that she too has benefited from Black privilege. It unjustly rescued a rape-accused Nigerian called Aloaye Foy-Yamah and it’s unfairly elevated an incompetent Nigerian called Olukemi Adegoke.

Bending the knee to Jewish power

That was Kemi Badenoch’s maiden name, before she married a rich White banker and began the essential work to become Tory leader and prime minister of Britain. And what is that essential work? Is it being highly competent and boundlessly energetic in one’s jobs both before and after entering politics? No, not at all. If the very credible rumors are true, Badenoch has been lazy and useless in every job she’s ever had, from the few months she spent as “Digital Director” at the Spectator to her role as Minister for Women and Equalities in the Conservative government. No, the essential work for any ambitious politician in Britain consists not of being competent and energetic, but of strenuously sucking up to Jews and endlessly adulating Israel.

Bending the knee at Holocaust Central: Kemi Badenoch at Yad Vashem in 2023

In short, to succeed in British politics you have to perform the goy-grovel and prove that you’ll be a devoted shabbos goy or shabbos shiksa. And Badenoch has certainly proved herself to be a devoted shabbos shiksa. In 2023, for example, she bent the knee at Yad Vashem, the central shrine of Holocaustianity in Israel. Throughout the Gaza war, she has firmly backed Israel’s massacre-machine. So has the Labour prime minister Keir Starmer, of course. He too knew that he’d never get to the top without proving himself as a shabbos goy. That’s why he’s married to a Jew and has always firmly backed Israel. Robert Jenrick, Kemi Badenoch’s chief rival in the Tory leadership election, is also married to a Jew. And Jenrick’s Semito-sycophancy has soared even beyond Badenoch’s. He is funded by the Israeli billionaire Idan Ofer and has said that “the Star of David should be displayed at every point of entry to the UK to show” that “we stand with Israel.”

Diversity Hire vs Israel Cuck: Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick competing to be Tory leader

But Jenrick is a stale pale male, not a vibrant Black female like Badenoch. He doesn’t have Black privilege and he lost the final round of the leadership election to Badenoch. But he’s not given up hope of succeeding her, because he thinks that Badenoch’s incompetence and laziness will sooner or later outweigh her Black privilege. That’s when she’ll be removed and Jenrick can take over as chief Tory shabbos-goy. Working towards that happy day, he’s been very active on social media and in parliament. He’s trying to show that, unlike her, he works hard and is competent. But the demonic crime-thinker Dominic Cummings thinks that the Tories will not learn any lessons from useless Black Kemi Badenoch. He’s predicted that when she’s forced out as leader, they’ll replace her with useless Black James Cleverly, whom Cummings describes as an “NPC extraordinaire.” This is what Cummings has said about Badenoch at his Substack:

Kemi is lazy, brittle and delusional. In her previous jobs she was useless but learned to blame others. She doesn’t have any of the things needed for a serious leader. The people who like her are a) people who’ve swallowed Insider spin or b) a subset of Insider characters whose preferences and tastes are very far from the median voter. From all parts of the ideological spectrum I hear identical lines: ‘She won’t listen to anybody, she picks fights with everybody, she meets a businessman who made a fortune in X then explains why they’re wrong about X, she’s lazy and won’t read, she sits in her office playing computer games on her iPad, she sees stuff on Twitter and blurts it out, I can’t see her developing in the job’. Most spads [special political advisors] and donors who created her did not work on her leadership contest because they got so disillusioned. People inside her inner circle are already telling friends ‘I can’t see this working’. (“TSP #5: What comes in 2025-6 as both parties & Whitehall fail? What can be done?,” Dominic Cummings Substack, as updated from 13th February 2025 [TSP = The Start-Up Party, which is Cummings’ name for a proposed new party to replace the Conservatives and Labour])

Cummings is always careful not to give his enemies grounds to call him “racist,” so he doesn’t discuss how someone as useless as Badenoch became Tory leader. That is, he doesn’t discuss Black privilege or Semito-sycophancy. And when he describes a shadowy figure called Henry Newman as a “Kemi handler” who works on behalf of translunacy, he doesn’t note that Newman is Jewish. But Cummings still delivers a devastating indictment of the “Black Thatcher,” as he mockingly calls her. Badenoch isn’t the Black Thatcher — she’s the British Barack. Like Barack Obama, she’s an over-promoted Black narcissist and intellectual nullity. When Obama became president, it was the apotheosis of AA in the USA, of Affirmative Action in America. If Badenoch ever becomes prime minister, it will be the apotheosis of AA in the Yoo-Kay. I don’t think she will become prime minister, but she’s certainly fulfilled all the stereotypes of the Black diversity hire, from laziness and lateness to the way her work was done for her by a White colleague.

High-testosterone and high-narcissism: useless Black Kemi Badenoch, current leader of the Conservative party (image from Wikipedia)

Or so the rumors run. And those rumors are getting louder all the time. It seems as though she won’t last much longer as Tory leader and one anonymous insider has already proclaimed that “Badenoch must go,” arguing that  the “hapless Conservative leader is consigning the party to complete irrelevance.” Nevertheless, Kemi Badenoch is doing a good job at one thing. It’s the same thing as Sunak, Yousuf, Varadkar and Gething were good at: proving that non-White leaders are bad for the native Whites of the British Isles. As another of her disillusioned colleagues has said of Badenoch: “All the things we thought she’d be good at, she’s not. And all the things we thought she’d be bad at, she is.” If Black James Cleverly replaces Black Kemi Badenoch as Tory leader, we can confidently expect that he will do the same good job at being useless and helping to build the Blacklash, namely, the growing White revolt against the worship of Blacks and other non-Whites.

Black shabbos goy James Cleverly, “NPC extraordinaire,” meets Jewish crook Volodymyr Zelensky

And what about the stale pale male Robert Jenrick? Well, if he succeeds either Badenoch or Cleverly, his Semito-sycophancy will further expose Jewish control of British politics. At Neo-Krat, Colin Liddell has compared Jenrick to the French president Emmanuel Macron, who has long been rumored to be gay, like Blair and Obama before him, and whose wife is much older than he is. Wikipedia notes that Jenrick’s wife, Michal Berkner, “is nine years older than [him], and is the grandchild of Holocaust survivors. She is an Israeli-born and US-educated corporate lawyer who practises mainly in London. Together, they have three daughters, whom they are bringing up in the Jewish faith.” As Liddell himself sardonically concludes: “Nice to know that Jewish concerns will have a prominent place at the breakfast table should Mr Jenrick proceed further in his career!”

Liddell is right: it is nice to know that. And it will be even nicer if Jenrick topples Badenoch and she responds by accusing the Tory party of racism. She would look ridiculous to do that after all her anti-woke posturing, but her narcissistic rage may prove stronger than her reason. Her Black privilege has taken her to the top of the Tory party and she will be very angry when her Black pathologies force her White colleagues to depose her.

The Lesser of Two Evils: Responding to Joel Davis and Keith Woods

/13 Comments/in , , /by

1559 Words

Before a hot war begins, when the bullets start flying and the bombs start exploding, political warfare rages. We witness political warfare these days almost every time politicians open their mouths. Before political warfare, however, we have cultural warfare, which is where metapolitics becomes important. This kind of warfare consists of various historical, ideological, or religious narratives which shape the worldview of ordinary (read: non-political) people. These narratives compete to the point where politicians become champions for the dominant narratives of the people who elect them. And if such narratives become anti-White in nature, so be it. In fact, anti-White politics have become the norm among most non-White politicians in America these days (as well among quite a few White ones).

My job as a pro-White dissident writer is to frame or re-frame narratives which will assist ordinary Whites in combating such anti-White narratives. Metapolitics, basically. In metapolitics it is not necessary to surpass or deny a narrative. It is necessary only to match it with a counter-narrative. Victory in such conflicts depends as much upon the spirit of the interlocuters as it does on logic, evidence, and clarity. A side could be dead wrong in the face of the facts, but if they possess greater spirit than their opponents, then they will have greater influence in steering the dominant culture into the future. This is what we see with narratives that favor both Black and Jewish history.

I was reminded of this while reading about the recent debate between Joel Davis and Keith Woods. Davis, an Australian nationalist, finds that rehabilitating Adolf Hitler and National Socialism is crucial for today’s White Nationalism, while Woods, who is from Ireland, feels that the various stripes of White Nationalism do not need either to thrive. It was a fascinating and civil metapolitical exchange, and it greatly benefited the Right. In effect, the men differ on how to counter the prevailing Jewish narrative which claims that A) Hitler and the Nazis were a uniquely odious evil, and B) anyone who professes beliefs even remotely close to Hitler’s is potentially genocidal and should be suppressed.

In basic terms, Davis attempts to surpass the Jewish narrative with a unabashedly pro-Nazi one, while Woods attempts to go around it by not emphasizing Nazism at all. Both sides of the debate possess profound elements of truth and deserve respect from the Dissident Right. Yet, I find both sides a bit wanting. I also think that both men are working too hard, thereby requiring their followers to work too hard as well. For example, ascribing to Davis’ position 85 years after the fall of Nazism would require a lot of reading and documentary viewing as well as the ability to discern good sources from bad. By the same token, ascribing to Woods’ position would require some fairly deft mental gymnastics to articulate a rightist position that does not evoke the Nazis in the minds of a disinterested audience. The bar for entry here is a little too high.

There is a third way, however, one that combines the strengths of both sides of the debate and, in its simplicity and directness, promises the substantial metapolitical victory that has been eluding White people since the end of World War II.

But first, why are both sides wanting? Because Davis’s approach entails too much risk to be successful, and Woods’ approach ultimately leaves the Jewish narrative uncontested. Since in metapolitics truth often plays second fiddle to spirit, it doesn’t really matter how correct either side is, how well-researched or watertight their arguments are, or how persuasive their advocates are. What matters is how well either side can galvanize the spirit—or enthusiasm—of their followers. Unfortunately, neither Davis nor Woods make the most of Rightist spirit. Anyone goosestepping in Davis’ pro-Nazi direction would have to wade into the teeth of the globalist Left, which means giving up on the idea of having a career and children, and accepting a life of constant struggle and danger. For ordinary people, this is a spirit killer. On the other hand, side-stepping along with Woods offers no defense to the Nazi/genocide charge coming from the proponents of the uncontested Jewish narrative. By attempting to go around the narrative rather than face it head on, Woods appears to tacitly concede the truth behind it. He can invoke Irish or Slavic nationalists all he likes, but in the eyes of a disinterested audience, this will come across as a bit of a dodge. This is also a spirit killer.

While neither approach is without merit, each gets us closer to our ultimate goal of White ethnostates only by baby steps—steps which may or may not keep up with the vagaries of history.

The third way I’m promoting entails meeting—but not defeating—the Jewish metapolitical Nazi narrative. This has the advantage of being less risky than Davis’ approach yet more direct than Woods’. It’s also easier to swallow than either counter-narrative, and no less true. Basically, we need to look at Nazism as a defensive wartime ideology, which was preferrable to its alternative: Bolshevism. At its worst, it was evil, sure. But it was the lesser of two evils.

This is it. This is all one needs to rouse the spirit of the Right and stem the odious tide of the Left. For one, it widens the tent to include both Davis and Woods. People in both camps can agree that the swastika, for all its merits and demerits, was morally superior to and less destructive than the hammer and sickle. This history is undeniable. Secondly, by keeping the reasoning so basic and simple, most White people will not need to read lengthy essays or watch obscure documentaries to climb on board. All they need to know is that the Bolsheviks killed more people than the Nazis did, and for less reason. The Nazis at least had the decency to wait until England and France had declared war on them before kicking their atrocities into high gear. The Soviets, on the other hand, had no such qualms and put to death tens of millions between 1924 and 1939, when they were at war with no one. We should also note that England and France had been egged on the entire time by US president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who had a clear anti-Nazi bias. How do we know this? Because the Allies had declared war on Germany for invading Poland, but not on the Soviet Union, which had done the exact same thing. Again, very simple. If the Allies were really on the side of good in 1939, why didn’t they attack the Soviets who had over an order of magnitude more deaths on their heads than the Nazis did? It’s a fair question, and one that the defenders of the prevailing narrative would have a hard time answering without resorting to blatant Jewish chauvinism.

We should also remember this passage from Hitler’s Reichstag speech of January 1939, as channeled through notorious Hitler hater William Shirer in his Rise and Fall of the Third Reich:

If the international Jewish financiers . . . should again succeed in plunging the nations into a world war, the result will be . . . the annihilation of the Jewish race throughout Europe.

See that? Hitler was actually being comparatively nice here by warning the Jews what would happen to them if they instigated another world war (which they did, they totally did). Did Stalin offer such consideration before murdering 15 million in the Holodomor and untold millions more in the Great Terror and the Gulag Archipelago during the 1920s and 1930s? Of course not. Hence the Nazis were the lesser of two evils. Does this seem like a weaker claim than what either Joel Davis or Keith Woods is offering? That’s because it is, and that is a good thing. I call it the Weak Claim Paradox.

There’s another reason for this as well. I personally am not a Nazi. However, gun to head, if I had to choose sides during Ragnarök, I would plop for the Nazis over the Bolsheviks. Why? Because as a White, straight, conservative male who is not consumed with guilt and self-hatred, the Nazis are much less likely to shoot me. This is an excellent reason. And given how prone the disproportionately Jewish Soviets were to shooting White people, Whites today should realize that Jews were not the only ones who suffered during the 20th century—nor were they absent among the people inflicting the suffering. In fact, it could be argued that they did more of the latter than the former.

None of this means that Joel Davis or Keith Woods should change their beliefs. Davis should continue praising the Nazis, and Woods should continue eschewing them. There is truth on both sides, and it is good they balance themselves out in pro-White circles. However, it couldn’t hurt if both men and their followers were to employ the Weak Claim Paradox from time to time when reaching out to normies. Believe what you want about the Nazis, but they were and still are objectively better than the alternative. And what we’re getting today with unfettered globalism, immigration, crime, and degeneracy is the alternative.

And if anyone hits back with the Nazi smear, simply respond, “At least we’re not Bolsheviks. They were worse.”

Tuukka Kuru interviews Dr. Tom Sunic

/2 Comments/in /by
  1. Greetings, Tom! How are you and your family doing?

We are exercising the art of psychic survival amidst our troubled times. Having survived the fraud of communism, there is no reason we cannot survive the deception of liberalism.

  1. You have actively followed Trump’s second term and carefully assessed its impact on global politics. Was Trump’s re-election just an isolated event, or a sign of a larger cultural shift?

With or without Trump, the cultural-political shift was already in motion long before Trump’s arrival at the White House. President Trump’s contribution lies in his unintentional effort to preserve the Liberal System through illiberal policies that challenge the international order established by the United States and the Soviet Union in 1945. Though few are willing to acknowledge it, the liberal capitalist system has exhausted its potential and has become dysfunctional. Trump’s protectionist measures align with what sociologists call the paradox of unintended consequences, where actions yield unexpected and often contrary results.

  1. The rift between the United States and the EU is a situation that nationalists did not foresee. How do you see this rift changes the EU’s ideology in the near future? Will the European Union become a more authoritarian actor?

The European Union is not, has never been, and will never be a political actor. It was designed solely as a monetary transfer mechanism and a tariff-free zone. Its existence owes much to American post-World War II influence in Europe, embodied by figures like Maurice Schumann and Jean Monnet. The EU’s original purpose was twofold: to serve as a bulwark against the Soviet Union and to prevent Germany from emerging as a unifying force for other European nations. This presents an intriguing paradox where President Trump deserves recognition—he correctly sees that propping up this fragile, artificial construct is no longer worth the trouble. Despite the witch hunts against free thinkers, orchestrated or tolerated by zealous EU commissioners and local prosecutors in member states, the dream to transform the EU into an authoritarian surveillance state remains unfeasible. There is no such thing as a ”European nation,” just as there are no true ”European nationalists.” Too many dissenting voices fracture the Brussels-based oligarchy, while rifts persist among the more than thirty nationalist parties and movements across Europe—often at odds with one another. The EU’s engagement in Ukraine exemplifies this discord, revealing divisions both among Brussels elites and between nationalists in individual member states.

  1. The reduction of the United States’ military presence and the ongoing war in Ukraine have increased the need for Europe’s independent defense. However, the rearmament of many European states has proven to be extremely challenging. Could Europe ever become a credible military superpower?

Europe has never been a credible, unified military power. This follows up on your earlier questions and my previous response. Let’s abandon the self-deluding myth of a common European homeland. For over three millennia, Europeans have waged civil wars —from the mythical  Trojan War to the thirty years-long Peloponnesian War, from the Thirty Years’ War in the 17th-century to the catastrophic thirty year stretch from the First to the Second World War. Name a single European nation-state that hasn’t clashed with its neighbor. Take Finland, locked historically in recurring struggles with Russia, or the brutal recent conflict between Serbs and Croats. Today, we see Russia and Ukraine—two European nations—tearing each other apart. It’s time we stop fooling ourselves with the notion of “common European homeland”.

  1. International cooperation has always been a tough pill for nationalist movements to swallow. How should European states organize themselves – as a centralized “Fortress Europe” or as independent nation-states with minimal interaction with each other?

With over 40 million non-Europeans residing in the EU, the notion of a “Fortress Europe” sounds bizarre. Furthermore, the era of the nation-state is over, as European nationalists across the board have consistently demonstrated a drive  for self-destruction. What is needed now is a revival of the concept of empire, or the Reich. In hindsight, the Holy Roman Empire (often referred to as the Reich) and the Habsburg Empire appear to have possessed greater durability—and thus legitimacy—than the current EU construct. A case could be made for resurrecting the decentralized model of the Holy Roman Empire, which stood in stark contrast to the centralized, proto-Jacobin structure of France or the sprawling overseas empire of Britain. Today, the British and French are grappling with ugly consequences of their earlier globalist and messianic ambitions, which uprooted their societies in pursuit of multiracial  and universalist goals.

  1. You wrote the book Homo Americanus, in which you sharply analyze the American psyche. Are the European and American ways of understanding the world fundamentally irreconcilable? What are the biggest differences between these worldviews?

Homo americanus emerged as the American mirror image of  the Soviet Homo sovieticus. Both sprang from the same ideological root: an egalitarian, progress-driven vision of the glorious future. Yet, by the late 1980s, Homo sovieticus disappeared precisely because its twin brother, Homo americanus, proved to be more adept at realizing those same Soviet communist principles in America and Western Europe. Over the past half-century, utopian ideals, such as multiculturalism, DEI, wokeness contained the messages already well tested in former communist Eastern Europe and Russia, where they had yielded catastrophic results. President Trump recognizes that these communistic policies, championed by Homo americanus, threaten to hasten America’s decline. This awareness drives his shifting course: he rejects these liberal, quasi-communist agendas while simultaneously trying to preserve the broader Liberal System.

  1. The war in Ukraine has been ongoing for over three years, with hundreds of thousands of men fallen on both sides of the front. A war between two states with very low fertility rates is a historical anomaly. How do you think these warring nations will recover after a potential peace?

The origins of the war Russian-Ukrainian war remain underexplored in the Western mainstream media. The role of U.S. neoconservatives in the former Obama and Biden administrations deserves scrutiny, particularly their interest in leveraging Ukraine as a strategic foothold to undermine the Russian Federation. Even if a peace treaty between Russia and Ukraine were signed tomorrow, the conflict’s aftermath would be far from resolved. Deep-seated resentments between the two sides will prove challenging to mend, ensuring a lingering bitterness.

  1. Currently, more children are annually born in Nigeria alone than in all of Europe combined. How do you think Europe’s fertility rates will develop in the future – will the current era of low fertility be a historical misstep, or become a permanent state? Is the racial extinction of Europeans a real threat?

Since 1945, Europe has embraced the politics of multiracialism, often cloaked under the euphemism of multiculturalism. One of the liberal-communist strategies to subdue and pacify European populations was the importation of cheap labor from Africa and Asia. This policy has given rise to a consumerist mindset of  ”dictatorship of well-being”—a misguided belief among many Europeans that history can have its conclusion, and that by refusing to identify an external enemy, perpetual peace will automatically  emerge. This flawed, unpolitical notion of politics will have dire consequences for all Europeans.

  1. The worldviews of young men and women have sharply diverged — surveys in Finland, for example, show that the so-called “woke” phenomenon is highly genderized, with its values rarely gaining support among young men. What do you think is causing this gender divide, where did it originate, and how could these increasingly estranged young men and women be brought back together?

The woke phenomenon and the rise of academic self-censorship align fully with my earlier statements and my numerous writings on the communist roots of transgenderism, multiracialism, and their various crypto-communist derivatives we are observing now in Europe. The much-touted mystique of liberalism and democracy is unraveling because it defies the laws of nature. The modern Liberal System built on freedom and nation-suppressing edicts is nearing its collapse. Just as the communist experiment, in order to survive, morphed into its liberal Double, this very same liberal ”Double” is now facing its own demise.

  1. The theme of our upcoming conference is “The Rising Tide of Color.” Last time, you gave an interesting speech about the coercive measures applied by the liberal system. What will be the topic of your upcoming presentation?

The upcoming conference takes its title from Lothrop Stoddard’s book. Likewise, a century ago, German historian Oswald Spengler also foresaw ”the revolution of the colored people” (Die Revolution der Farbigen). In my presentation, I will survey  the process of racial decline in ancient Greece and Rome, with a focus on the hereditary curse among some mythical and historical figures. As modern behavioral geneticists have argued, addressing future challenges requires integrating the social sciences with the natural sciences.

www.tomsunic.com

Avatar photo

Tuukka Kuru

Olen vuonna 1990 syntynyt rovaniemeläislähtöinen koneinsinööri, joka tunnetaan erityisesti Awakening-konferenssista, 612-marsseista ja Monokulttuuri FM-nettiradiosta.

To burn or not to burn, Part 3: Reflections on Ireland’s refugee lunacy

/9 Comments/in /by

Only two foreigner-related burnings in the last six months, two buildings destroyed by masked men with hand tools, the end of a Brother War and a battle that never happened.

Some good news: Two refugee centres have been stopped, without the need to burn them.

In Athlone, the 1,000-man camp caused repeated marches. Even local government politicians got the Council to take legal action. The court has ruled that the development is illegal, and it seems it will be closed, though this is quite possibly just a ruse. There are a few dozen refugees in the camp already.

While the court case was ongoing, there were repeated protest marches through the town to the camp. It is possible, that if there were no marches, the court would have quietly decided that the refugee camp was perfectly legal. Even the most peaceful crowd  in the world is a statement of power, and a warning to the judge: We are many, you are few!

Once, with only a few hundred people, they got around the police lines. A few young lads got into the camp itself and ran around for few minutes roaring peaceful invitations to the refugees to remigrate themselves as soon as possible.

The refugees described themselves as terrified by this. They also complain that in local shops, the staff tell them: You’re not from around here. Get the fuck out of the shop! They complain that the locals “think we are not human beings”. It seems like the three decades of multicultural propaganda we’ve had here is starting to wear off…

The second refugee centre to be stopped was in Schull, County Cork. After “long discussions” between the owners of a proposed refugee hotel and various people including local independent TD Michael Collins, the owners decided not to bother with the refugees after all. As simple as that!

It seems that the best and simplest way to stop a refugee camp popping up in your area is to have long, repeated eyeball-to-eyeball discussions with whoever has the contract for the refugees. They will probably not want to have those conversations with you, so you will have to find creative ways to enable the conversations.

The construction of many, many, many other refugee camps is continuing, despite mostly peaceful protests. Thornton Hall and Coolock in north Dublin, Clonmel and four other camps in County Tipperary and Ballina and Knock in Mayo, to list just a few. In preparation for our November election, many refugee camp projects were paused, so as to reduce the impact on the election. Now the election is over, they have resumed construction.

It seems that the pace of mass immigration has increased.

The official Catholic Church here has promoted mass migration. But the Trad Catholics are stirring. The tiny pilgrimage village of Knock is due to be enriched by hundreds of refugees. There is not as much money in Marian apparitions as there used to be, and some pilgrim hotel owners want to pivot to the billion euro refugee business. A crowd of a hundred gathered across the road from the Basilica. Speakers criticised the priest at the Basilica for preaching a nonsense sermon saying we must welcome the — obviously fake — refugees.

It must be embarrassing for the priest at Ireland’s top Marian shrine to be publicly ridiculed outside his own church by elected Kildare town councillor, Tom McDonnell.

After the speeches, the crowd walked through the village to the refugee hotel, reciting prayers. Four men carried a table with a small statue of Mary.  The Gardai were there, but they kept a very long way from us. Definitely the most restrained Garda presence on a Remigration protest. Banners with pictures of Mary, Jesus and some saint killing a dragon added beauty and drama.

Two golden brown-skinned people were in our group, and clearly enjoyed the Remigration message. At a guess, they were St Thomas Christians from Kerala, India. Anecdotally, it seems that Kerala Christians are much more honest and less violent than other Indian/Pakistani immigrants to Ireland. When the time comes to deport their Hindu and Muslim compatriots, the men from Kerala will be happy to help us…

In Belfast, Irish and British ethno-nationalists held a small, mostly peaceful Remigration demo (23.3.25). There was a pro-migration counter demo. This is the second time in a year that the Irish tricolour and the British union jack have been carried in brotherly harmony at Remigration events in Ulster. The Catholic/Protestant split in Ireland has been used to manipulate us for four centuries. The presence of the two flags in peaceful cooperation in the Great Remigration project is a sign that this particular Brother war is over.  The MSM were very careful not to mention that this protest took place.

The non-Battle of Ballaghdereen.

There was a complaint (1.11.24) made by an ethnic Irish teenage boy that he had been raped by some foreign males. The police are supposedly looking for the men, but won’t release descriptions, except to say that the rapists were “children”, not refugees and were here legally. Sounds like a UK-based Pakistani rape gang on their “Rape a Leprechaun” Emerald Isle tour, but that’s just a educated guess, not a stereotype or misinformation..

This would just be another sad story, soon to be forgotten, except for one detail: The ethnic Irish boy who was raped, was also an ethnic Irish Traveller. Travellers have a reputation for fierce fighting and long running blood feuds.

There was a huge peaceful demonstration in the small town. Candles, prayers, calls for peace and safety. Councillor Michael Frain addressed the crowd and condemned a Remigration activist present for stirring up hate around the country. Unkind commentators posted photos, supposedly of Frain, showing him as possessor of a huge curved nose and alleging he has some Jewish ancestry.

The next day, there was a smaller peaceful demo in the town. Only fifty or sixty. All completely masked and carrying various heavy hand tools. They peacefully did serious damage to one house and did minor damage to another house.

The local Gardai prudently decided to wait until the men had left before going to investigate the damage. To arrest fifty Travellers, you will need a minimum of a hundred cops, and it would take a long time to get a hundred cops to Ballaghdereen. Much simpler just to wait until the Travellers have made their point and left.

This is hugely symbolic. This is the Gardai surrendering to Remigration protestors. If we outnumber the available Garda ten to one, we all have masks on and stout sticks and tools in our hands, give the impression that we are not to be trifled with and hint that we have some Traveller genetics … they won’t come near us.

They used the riot squad in Newtown Mount Kennedy and elsewhere. But they knew the protest was coming, they knew they were facing unarmed women and children and they had time to send the riot squad down.  The masked protest in Ballaghdereeen was totally unannounced and it was “men only”.

A few weeks later, an empty pub in Ballaghdereen went on fire. Badly damaged. If it is connected to the refugee or the Perfectly Legal Pakistani teen rapist business, nobody is saying anything. Perhaps it’s just good old “Jewish lightning” — insurance fraud?

Irish Travellers were nicer, back in the day. Sure, they might steal a chicken or take some quality tools from the shed you foolishly left unlocked  or seduce the wife that you foolishly left unsupervised. But they could sing and dance, they had lovely caravans, great style, worked with horses and made and fixed tin pots. That’s why we used to have the lovely word “tinkers”. They worked the harvests. They were useful, and not particularly violent or dangerous. That was then.

Then modernisation, the welfare state, and drugs and TV. Now they are much more violent, heavily into fraud, drugs and intimidation. There were even a few ethnic Irish traveller lads convicted of keeping homeless people as slaves in England! They do dirty jobs for rich men: evictions, property development scams, security and they even are making money from the billion euro refugee accommodation business.

It’s possible the Rape of Ballaghdereen will be the start of a blood feud between Irish Travellers and Pakistanis. If this happens, this will be good for the Travellers, good for the rest of us Irish and even good for the Pakistanis. Traveller men will stop committing suicide and overdosing: you can’t be at that when there’s a blood feud going on. They’ll stop behaving badly to us Irish and start behaving badly to the Pakistanis. The Pakistanis will get bored of Traveller harassment and peacefully remigrate back to the sunshine and mangoes of dear old Pakistan.

Readers who want comedy updates on Ireland-UK migration madness should check out Derek Domino‘s online channel. Some accuse him of Freemason membership, based on his display of the number 33 at the start of his videos, but this is flimsy evidence to hang the guy. He tells us how grim things are, which might be construed as a black pill. But he also makes fun of our Naked Emperors, shows how easy Remigration is and inspires us to take action appropriate to our station in life. His skit “Remigration, Irish style” is top class comedy